![Page 1: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Global Water PartnershipRegional Days - 2012Results-based planning, monitoring and evaluating
Focus Area 3
Stockholm22-24 August 2012
![Page 2: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Objective: progress in focus area 3:
• to simplify and integrate the many inputs and report requests in the GWP work programme management cycle
• to rationalise the Outcome Mapping aspects so they are easier to understand and apply
looking again at the more familiar concepts and approaches underlying RBM and
LFAs• to enable effective programme implementation
demonstrate value for money
![Page 3: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
New documents:
1. Annual Progress Review for 2011 – May 2012
a new “report”
2. Annual Work Programme Management Manual – August 2012 a new “manual”
![Page 4: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
• A succinct yet analytical overview of activities undertaken and outcomes achieved
• To complement “GWP in Action”• Based on available M&E data and information:
• GWPO Secretariat• Technical Committee• Global thematic priorities• Regional programmes
Annual Progress Review 2011
![Page 5: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Work Programme Management Cycle:Intentional Design:
PlanningVision and MissionBoundary Actors
Desired OutcomesProgress Markers
Implementation
ActivitiesOutputs
Monitoring
1) Progress Markers - through outcome journals
2) Implementation of activities
Evaluation
LearningReporting
![Page 6: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
1. IWRM Outcomes
2. Influencing change – outcome mapping progress markers
3. Activities and outputs
Overall Progress in Implementing the Strategy:
![Page 7: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
IWRM Outcomes:ref. www.gwptoolbox.org
A. The enabling environment (policies, legal frameworks and financing and incentives)
B. The institutions and required capacity; and
C. The management instruments for sharing data/information, assessing, planning, negotiating, cooperating, regulating and financing management and development
7
![Page 8: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
IWRM Outcomes:
Outcome level governance toolsclustered by GWP ToolBox classification
2009-2011 Strategy
Total since 1998
A Enabling Environment 26 58
B Institutional Roles and Required Capacity 15 69
C Management Instruments 48 95
Total: 89 222
• Steady progress during this Strategy and since 1998• Higher incidences during programme implementation• Difficult to assess value and links to “benefits”
![Page 9: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Influencing Change:
2010 2011
Goal 1
48
36
30
65
/
+
++
No Info
Goal 1
36
6139
43
/
+
++
No Info
Goal 2
28
24
13
64
/
+
++
No Info
Goal 2
34
3718
40
/
+
++
No Info
Goal 328
40
10
67
/
+
++
No Info
Goal 3
35
51
16
43
/
+
++
No Info
Goal 4
28
25
17
49
/
+
++
No Info
Goal 4
30
37
22
30
/
+
++
No Info
• plausible linkages between outputs and outcomes
• based on monitoring and reporting on the influence on the boundary actors with whom GWP is working to effect behavioural change
![Page 10: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Influencing Change:• Steady progress in influencing change as
monitored by progress markers – plausible linkages are there!
• We will not fully address all outcome challenges during present strategy…
• Focus on outcomes and plausible linkages has had a positive impact in reporting and mind-set in the organisation… e.g. “GWP in Action”
• We are not there yet when it comes to clear links with benefits and value for money
![Page 11: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Activities and Outputs:
![Page 12: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Activities and Outputs:• Pattern of activities and the emphasis given to
the strategic areas is similar in 2011 as compared to the previous years.
• Types of activities under thematic areas vary, also from region-to-region reflecting regional priorities and varying levels of maturity and capacity.
![Page 13: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Activities and Outputs:
SE 1.5 Facilitating transboundary cooperation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60process
capacity
awareness
productsoperational
meetings
part. others
SE 2.1 Climate change
0
10
20
30
40
50
60process
capacity
awareness
productsoperational
meetings
part. others
![Page 14: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Network Challenges in 2011:• Mid-term Strategy Review:
8 focus areas – to conclude the present strategy
• Making the ”knowledge chain” work: Strengthening links between global, regional and country activities, and with knowledge partners
• The GWP Network – maintaining and increasing relevance as a global action networkAdvocacy and increasingly Implementing IWRM
• Financial Management: 2011 a year of austerity • Gender and youth strategy – new initiative
![Page 15: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Priority thematic highlights:
• Objective for 5 priority thematic areas:• a coherent “operational strategy”
describing opportunities building on Network strengths
• Effective links in the “knowledge chain” from Technical Committee to Regions and Countries facilitated by GWPO
![Page 16: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
1. Financing Water Management:
• Good links to EUWI Finance Working Group
• Continuing challenge to connect to national, regional, and global initiatives
![Page 17: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
2. Transboundary Cooperation:
• Strengths: TEC and new NO position• Various initiatives underway globally (e.g.
GWP Dundee scholarship programme) and regionally
• Coherent “operational strategy” under development
![Page 18: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
3. Adapting to Climate Change:• Well-developed operational strategy under
implementation through WACDEP in Africa
Good e.g. of “implementing IWRM”• Global influence increasing• Regional programmes conceptualised –
awaiting funding - DFID• Challenge: scaling-up in similar
programme in other regions
![Page 19: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
4. Food Security:
• Progress: 2 regional/global workshops in 2011
• Challenges:• still to flesh-out a coherent “operational
strategy”• provide global leadership
![Page 20: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
5. Tackling Urbanisation:
• Progress: Good TEC leadership with publications on Integrated Urban Water Management
• Many diverse activities throughout the network
• Lack of coherent operational strategy – linked to NO vacancies
![Page 21: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Regional highlights:
• In depth reviews for all 13 regions• Comparing planned vs actual progress• Analysis of issues: strengths, weaknesses,
challenges, etc.
![Page 22: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Response to the May draft:• Positive response from the SC and FPG• But we can do better:
• Analysis - enabling discussion of successes, opportunities, challenges and recommendations
• What do you think?• Will this report enable us to improve our
performance?• Regionally, Globally, Technical Committee
• Is it helpful?
![Page 23: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
• to simplify and integrate the many inputs and report requests in the GWP work programme management cycle
• All requests for report by:• Network operations• Communications• Finance
Annual Work Programme Management Manual – August 2012
![Page 24: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
• 3 annual reports, one annual workplan and one monthly newsletter:
A. GWP Annual Progress Review
B. Annual Workplan
C. Annual Report – GWP in Action
D. Monthly e-newsletter NewsFlow
E. Annual Financial Report – based on quarterly reports
GWPO reports
![Page 25: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Annual SequenceWorkplans and Reports:
![Page 26: Using a results-based planning, monitoring and evaluation approach by J.Metzger](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052412/5582f11fd8b42a21168b4a53/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Report / Workplan Request date Deadline:
Request A:Input to Annual Progress Review reportsee section 2.1
1 October 1 November
Request B:Annual Workplansee section 2.2
1 October 1 November
Request C:Inputs for Annual Report - “GWP in Action”see section 2.3
15 December 15 January
Request D:Monthly Narrative Reportssee section 2.4
Monthlybeginning of each
month
Request E:Quarterly Financial Reportssee section 2.5
Quarterly20th day each of April,
July, October and January
Reporting schedule: