ISSN (Print): 2328-3734, ISSN (Online): 2328-3696, ISSN (CD-ROM): 2328-3688
American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
AIJRHASS 13-212; © 2013, AIJRHASS All Rights Reserved Page 50
AIJRHASS is a refereed, indexed, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary and open access journal published by International Association of Scientific Innovation and Research (IASIR), USA
(An Association Unifying the Sciences, Engineering, and Applied Research)
Available online at http://www.iasir.net
UNOFFICIAL DIPLOMACY AT WORK: A SAARC
PERSPECTIVE
Prof. Rajender Gupta1 and Neelam Choudhary2 1Deptt. Of Economics,
University of Jammu 2Assistant Professor of Economics,
DDE, University of Jammu, J & K, INDIA.
I. Introduction
When one thing stops working, we shop around for alternatives. In the realm of regionalism, initially only state
was lent credibility, while non-state actors remained underrated. But now, with the achievements of this
burgeoning group, this view point has got the chuck. The literature is jam-packed with success stories of this
heterogeneous group. As true of many other such organizations, the SAARC officials have not succeeded much
in sowing the seeds of peace and prosperity for the people. The onus of completing the unfinished task of
enabling SAARC reach the crescendo of performance now lies also with unofficial SAARC. For almost two
decades now i.e. since 1990s, unofficial dialogues have got a sporting chance of proving and sustaining
themselves. To what extent have they remained insulated from the ‗wheels within wheels‘ situation
characterizing SAARC and whether its (Unofficial SAARC‘ s) staggering achievement (Or the absence of it)
has made a difference? For answering this question beggaring description, I intend to dig as much evidence
out of the ground of well established studies, as my digger (my ability to analyse, time constraint, relevance etc.)
allows. With this background, this paper assesses unofficial diplomacy in SAARC. To understand the
contribution of different tracks to regional cooperation, Institute of Multitrack Diplomacy‘s (IMTD‘s) Multi
Track Diplomacy (MTD) model has been relied upon.
II. Multi Track Diplomacy: The System
In order to understand the system by which international peacemaking occurs the parable of the blind man and
the elephant might be considered (Diamond and McDonald, 1996: 1)11: Like the blind man, if we feel only the
trunk or the tusk or the tail of the peace pachyderm, we will misperceive the true nature of this lively creature.
Likewise, if we consider the animal as a whole but don‘t know the parts and how they each contribute, we lose
the value of acquaintance with a richly complex being. Multi-Track Diplomacy is a conceptual way to view the
process of peacemaking as a complete elephant, a living system which needs the combination of all its body
1 Cited in Siver 2006.
Abstract: When one thing stops working, we shop around for alternatives. In the realm of regionalism,
initially only state was lent credibility, while non-state actors remained underrated. But now, with the
achievements of this burgeoning group, this view point has got the chuck. The literature is jam-packed with
success stories of this heterogeneous group. Many proven studies on hand show that the official actors
in SAARC diplomacy have been snowed under with certain questions/ disputes/ conflicts they are not well
versed in handling and solving. As true of many other such organizations, the SAARC officials have not
succeeded much in sowing the seeds of peace and prosperity for the people. The onus of completing the
unfinished task of enabling SAARC reach the crescendo of performance now lies also with unofficial
SAARC. For almost two decades now i.e. since 1990s, unofficial dialogues have got a sporting chance of
proving and sustaining themselves. To what extent have they remained insulated from the ‘wheels within
wheels’ situation characterizing SAARC and whether its (Unofficial SAARC’ s) staggering achievement (Or
the absence of it) has made a difference? With this question, this paper intends to analyse unofficial
diplomacy in SAARC and concludes that the way these non-state actors have stood by the cause of regional
cooperation and beyond that i.e. their contribution in spawning a general support for one ‘South Asia’
speak well for themselves, given that it was not of yore that the first unofficial dialogue got itself
recognized.
R. Gupta et al., American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(1), June-August, 2013, pp. 50-
65
AIJRHASS 13-212; © 2013, AIJRHASS All Rights Reserved Page 51
parts to function. Diamond and McDonald (1996), Chigas (2003), Montville and Davidson (1981), and Nan
(2003) all support the theory that different levels of Track diplomacy exist as the ‗body parts‘ which, when
combined, can function most effectively as the complete elephant. So as to fully capture the complexity of Track
II diplomacy, one must understand that it is comprised of separate sub-tracks. The Multi-Track theory reflects
the values of the different Tracks, which, when combined, contribute most effectively to a peace process. Multi-
Track theory recognizes that in modern, complex society peacemaking cannot be left solely to either
governmental interaction or the responsibility of the state. (Carvalho 2010 )
These nine sub-tracks are:
Government or Peacemaking through Diplomacy,
Nongovernmental / Professional or Peacemaking through Conflict Resolution,
Business orPeacemaking through Commerce,
Private Citizen or Peacemaking through Personal Involvement,
Research/ Training and Education or Peacemaking through Learning,
Activism or Peacemaking through Advocacy,
Religion or Peacemaking through Faith in Action,
Funding or Peacemaking through Providing Resources, and
Communications and the Media, or Peacemaking through Information.
Each sub-track contains a system within itself with regards to membership, activities, philosophy, and purpose,
which often overlap. They mostly complement each other‘s values and activities when combined as the living
system of modern peacemaking. Therefore, the Multi-Track approach is the interrelatedness and coordination of
these nine sub-tracks. 2 2
Compass Interaction Model,
The compass Interaction model best describes the Multi-Track approach and in theory proves the most
appropriate model because it demonstrates the correlation of all the sub-tracks as having equal val3ue but
different functions. 3
Figure : Multi-Track Diplomacy (Compass interaction model) 44
Overview of non-state actors in South Asia (SAARC)
2 Carvalho 2010
3 Ibid
4 Siver 2005
R. Gupta et al., American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(1), June-August, 2013, pp. 50-
65
AIJRHASS 13-212; © 2013, AIJRHASS All Rights Reserved Page 52
There is an urgent need to expand South Asian cooperation and connectivity beyond the realm of the state.
There has been increased activity and cooperation among South Asia‘s non-state actors – the corporate sector,
professional associations, civil society, media, cultural groups, and Track II processes……(Gujral) 5. The forces
of globalization, increasing economic interdependence,….. and especially post-September 2001
terrorism….have all triggered new common efforts among states in South Asia as elsewhere…….(Bailes etal
2007 ).The post-cold war order has made governance polycentric…..With the transfer of sovereignty from the
mono-centric governance of the past to disparate groups of citizens ….. the responsibilities of socializing
tendency of heterogeneous civil societies have increased in policy making, advocacy, mediation of power and
the management of distributional conflicts. Presently, the state no longer monopolizes the security function……
(Wagner, 2006:110) 6 5….New issues such as ecology… have broadened the concept of security…….. Modern
politics is couched in the language of rights (Tuck, 1999:1).7 678Participation rules have also marked a shift
from top-down elite to a bottom-up stakeholders' participatory process…... ( Dahal ).The inability of the
governments led the civil society in South Asia to take the lead during the second phase in the 1990s. This
period spawned a wide range of non-official dialogues ……( Behera, 2009 ).
It has been talked about non-state actors in Asia that cooperation and inclusiveness is leading to ―interregional
regime-building‖(FES 2007).A revealing facet of this new phenomenon is the induction of a novel bottom up
forms of regionalism initiated by the civil society (Lama ). Here, the concept of alternative regionalism fits
well. 8
History of unofficial dialogues in SAARC
According to a senior State Department official the idea of a non-official Indo-Pak dialogue was under
consideration during the last years of the Reagan Administration, but it materialized in the aftermath of the 1990
crisis when the Gates Mission was dispatched to Islamabad and New Delhi ( Shah 1997 ).
Different tracks of unofficial diplomacy in SAARC
Let us now discuss the unofficial tracks (2-9) in accordance with the multitrack diplomacy.This paper includes
the unofficial steps taken in a multilateral framework i.e. under the aegis of SAARC. The bilateral dialogues
have been excluded.
Track 2
Track 2, according to Santos and Esq. refers to unofficial, informal peacemaking by conflict resolution
professionals and NGOs, usually nongovernmental and unofficial groups and individuals, often parallel to and
in support of Track 1. In literature on multi-track or multi-actor diplomacy, Track 2 is delimited for government
officials operating unofficially.The activities of Track Two peace workers vary from organizing problem-
solving workshops, acting as messengers and go-betweens to ….organizing seminars and conferences and
private one-on-one diplomacy behind the scenes. …Track Two Diplomacy can make a difference. In
Somaliland, for instance, the so-called Boroma process…culminated in a meeting of elders of all clans of
Somaliland who in a remarkable display of participatory democracy elected a government and a president.9
Kaye (2007:8) 9defines track two as unofficial policy dialogues, focused on problem solving, in which the
participants have some form of access to official policymaking circles. Evans refers to those Track 2 activities
which involves meetings of academics, journalists, politicians and also…govt. officials ….attending in their
private capacities as ‗blended dialogues‘ (1994c:125) 10 10
Professional (conflict resolution) in SAARC
It has been estimated that in 1998-99 alone there were over 38 track-II channels working in South Asia (Naik
2001), which is indicative of the involvement of civil society actors. Thus, unofficial SAARC is fast emerging
in domestic and regional peace constituencies (Lama ) .11 11
Some track two activities in SAARC 12
12
5 Cited in Dahal
6 Ibid
7 The concept is discussed in Keet 2007 and Chandra 2009
8 Cited in Introduction to People Building Peace
9 Cited in Acharya 2011
10 Cited in Muthiah Algappa ed. (2003) Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features (Stanford:
Stanford University Press):247
11 Cited in Ahmed and Bhatnagar 2008
12 Sources for PSCR, IRS, MCPR, ICPI &SFG, IPCS, WISCOMP: Elbinger 2007
R. Gupta et al., American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(1), June-August, 2013, pp. 50-
65
AIJRHASS 13-212; © 2013, AIJRHASS All Rights Reserved Page 53
The Program on Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution (PSCR) at the University of Karachi , The Institute of
Regional Studies (IRS) in Islamabad, Pakistan, The Malaviya Centre for Peace Research (MCPR) at Banaras
Hindu University,The International Centre for Peace Initiatives (ICPI) and Strategic Foresight Group (SFG)
( twin think tanks based in Mumbai; While SFG engages in research on future security issues, ICPI is involved
in conflict resolution in South Asia), The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) and Women in Security,
Conflict Management and Peace (WISCOMP) are some institutes having efficiently fretted the rope of mistrust
and distrust with the saw of papers, books, seminars, workshops, dialogues etc. Since 1994,Harvard University‘s
Program on International Conflict Analysis and Resolution (PICAR) has been working to foster problem-
solving dialogue in an unofficial effort to contribute to peace in Sri Lanka..( Hicks and Weisberg ). Some other
track two initiatives include Neemrana process 1313, Balusa Group,14 14Kashmir Study Group (KSG), Shanghai
Process 1515, Stimson Center Dialogues,16 16CSIS Meetings on Nuclear Risk Reduction Centres (NRRCs), 17 17 18 Cooperative Monitoring Center, Sandia National Laboratories, 18 19 20 Maritime Activities: The
Confidence and Cooperation in South Asian Waters Project,192122 Worldnet dialogues 20 23and IGSAC 21 24.
These are some gems, the shining example of which studs them well into the crown of SAARC‘s multitrack
diplomacy. The achievements are too many to be discussed in one paper. In the next paragraph, they have been
touched upon.
While discussing the Track Two dialogues in South Asia with a focus on policy-oriented and problem-solving
activities, Faiz argues that track two dialogues in South Asia are mostly semi-official in nature, dominated by a
few retired government officials. ―This leads to a ‗lack of cross-fertilization of ideas‘ as new and innovative
approaches to problems are not generated.‖
Despite the criticism faced by some of these, in particular, Neemrana for engaging the same people year after
year, these track two initiatives have a lot to show.They have been able to keep the negativity of the Political
Economy in check or at least neutralise it.They have granted flexibility to the not so supple mind of the official
actors. For example, relaxation in travel restrictions between India and Pakistan by the two governments has
been partly attributed to the efforts of the Neemrana process. One of the proposals made by the Balusa Group
was the establishment of effective military-to-military hotlines between India and Pakistan, increasing
interaction between the intelligence agencies of India and Pakistan, nuclear confidence building and greater
education of Indian and Pakistan leaders concerning the responsibility of leading nuclear weapon states.
According to two South Asia observers, the KSG ―has achieved a reputation for nonpartisan objectivity that has
earned it a hearing in New Delhi and Islamabad, and a measure of confidence among Kashmiri leaders‖
(Schaffer and Schaffer, 2005, p. 313).22 25 … Stimson organizers also believe that their workshops and
publications on nuclear terrorism have raised considerable consciousness of this problem in official circles,
particularly since the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States. The CSIS group recommended the
creation of NRRCs in India and Pakistan to improve communications and reduce the risks for miscalculations
leading to nuclear conflict. IGSAC recommended the establishment of a Poverty Alleviation Commission 23
SAARC’s Track 1.5 (Track one and a half)
Mapendere has elaborated on the concept of track one and a half diplomacy, which was originally brought
forward by Susan A. Naan, describing a mode in between track one, comprised of official actors, and track two
diplomacy. He defines track 1.5 diplomacy as ―peace making activities undertaken by non-political third parties
between high political representatives of warring groups, or governments‖ (Mapendre 2000: 66). 24 Track 1.5
diplomacy is supposed to combine the positive aspects which both track one and track two diplomacy have to
13 For details of Neemrana, see Faiz, Waslekar (1995), Kaye (2007)
14 Balusa group has been discussed by Faiz, Kaye, Dixit (2005), Durrani (2001).
15 Kaye 2007
16 Ibid
17 Ibid
18 Ibid
19 Ibid
20 Faiz
21 Waslekar 1995
22 Cited in Kaye 2007
23 Supra No. 21
24 Cited in Heiling 2007
R. Gupta et al., American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(1), June-August, 2013, pp. 50-
65
AIJRHASS 13-212; © 2013, AIJRHASS All Rights Reserved Page 54
offer. …..However, beside Mapendre‘s definition, others see track1.5 diplomacy as a process that distinguishes
itself from track one diplomacy merely by its informal character, not by the type of mediator ( Berghof
Foundation for Peace Support2007). 25 26…. Track two is thus a form of semiofficial interaction; the degree of
official involvement and influence here is far greater here than in epistemic communities. ….. ( Acharaya 2011 )
Bulk of the literature on SAARC counts the apex bodies as track 1.5. But in some studies all the professional
bodies (including recognized) form track 1.5.There is a rapid growth in the number of SAARC apex bodies that
specialize in different spheres. These include South Asia Chambers of Commerce and Industry (SCCI), South
Asia Free Media Association (SAFMA), SAARC Law, South Asian Federation of Accountants (SAFA) and
Foundation of SAARC Writers and Literature (FOSWAL). Characterized as Track One-and-Half, these are
autonomous organisations and some also receive financial support from the SAARC Secretariat and directly
service the official SAARC process.26 ……The three apex bodies of SAARC, SAFA, SAARC Law and CCI,
actively promote the objectives and development goals including the UN Millennium Development Goals of the
South Asian region. ( Perera 2008) …The affiliation provides them information, visibility, linkage, access and
recognition…. complement the official willingness to foster people-to-people relations and build regionalism
from bottom-up (Behera, 2008:2).27 2728 Apart from these professional bodies of track 1.5, SAARC also
recognizes ISACPA (Independent South Asian Commission for poverty alleviation), SAARC Research
Network, SAARC FINANCE etc., where there is considerable degree of autonomy from the official SAARC
process but the SAARC secretariat gets involved in feeding the final output to the official process. These
professional bodies (apex and recognized) have certainly facilitated professional interactions but have not
contributed much towards improving economic connectivity ( Kelegama: 3913).
SAARC has seen some recent developments in this regard. Suba Chandran has suggested the establishment of
an Indo-Pak Nuclear Commission on the model of the Indus Water Commission (IWC) between the two
countries. ―….The technical aspect of the Nuclear Commission could work alongside a track-1.5 initiative, to
avoid a major shortcoming of the Indus Water Commission.‖ ( Chandran 2010). Saman Kelegama, while
speaking at the 4th SAARC business leaders conclave on key issues of SAARC, stated among other things …
that the link between track 1 and 2 should be made more formal. In this regard, he appreciated the formation of
SAF.( Kelegama 2011). Touted as a Track 1.5 initiative, the South Asia Forum brings together government
functionaries businessmen, media and academics to generate "out of box ideas" for facilitating greater regional
economic integration and people-to-people contact in the region……… (IANS, 2011)
Private sector (Business organizations): Track 3
Although Diamond and McDonald assert that most businesses do not view themselves as having anything to do
with peace, the fact is that negotiations concerning money, resources, and labor always require diplomacy, and
so the diplomatic efforts of international businesses as they open new ventures are de facto peace
negotiations.(Cuthbert 2005) The Private Sector…encompasses a wide range of actors, mainly involved in for-
profit pursuits in commercial, trading, contracting, farming, mining, and other areas. ….. (Ulimwengu).
Private sector in SAARC
The private sector is emerging as an important stakeholder for regional economic integration. …..SAARC is
increasingly facing pressure from the private sector to remove barriers to allow market integration. 28 29 In an
issue paper, prepared by Asian Development Bank (ADB) and Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce
and Industry (FICCI), useful insight has been given for improving the business environment for private sector
led integration in South Asia. The paper was the result of a conference convened in New Delhi on 17‐18
November 2009 …..In the concluding Technical Session: ―Building Brand ‗SAARC‘, participants discussed
ways to make the SAARC ―brand‖ more visible …..Participants agreed that strengthening the SAARC ―brand‖
is critical to boosting regional integration in South Asia. (ADB and FICCI, 2010)
In a Regional Conference on SAARC (2006), in his paper "Private Sector and Conflict Management" Gautam
Ghosh highlighted the role of the private sector in the national economies and their ability to deal with issues
more efficiently. (Ghosh 2006). The Punjab, Haryana and Delhi (PHD) Chamber of Commerce and Industry
and other business organizations have played significant role in the regional cooperation in SAARC. PHD India-
Pakistan Desk have attempted to promote bilateral trade between the two countries since its inception in 1982…..
An extremely important initiative… is the formation of the India–Pakistan Chamber of Commerce and
Industry …in May 2005. This joint forum …intends to bring the two countries closer by enhancing the level of
trade…. … Other such initiatives include .. formation of Joint Business Councils (JBC) composed of
25 Ibid
26 Behera 2009
27 Cited in Dahal
28 Supra no.26
R. Gupta et al., American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(1), June-August, 2013, pp. 50-
65
AIJRHASS 13-212; © 2013, AIJRHASS All Rights Reserved Page 55
representatives of South Asia‘s business federations. ….By all accounts, South Asia is witnessing the rise of the
business community as the vanguard of regional cooperation and interdependence. In fact, it can ultimately
prove to be the biggest catalyst for peace in the region.29 30
As commented by Rosario (2008)3031,business forums have reportedly been accorded privileged status in these
sub regional institutional arrangements, where their views and inputs are closely regarded by high-level
officials . The same is true in South Asia. SAARC in 1992 granted formal ―apex body‖ status to a South
Asian business network—the SAARC Chambers of Commerce and Industry (SAARC-CCI)—and in 2000,
chose to extend that status for a further 15 years without the need for a biennial review as initially
planned…..(Nesadurai 2010). It is officially recognized by all the governments as well as the SAARC
Secretariat. 31 32
The literature supports the fact that private sector could not reach its limits in this region. In SAARC, it has got
a cold response from policy makers in important decisions. ―While the market is an important driver pushing for
regional economic integration, it is not in the driver‘s seat. ….They were conspicuously absent in the formal
negotiations over SAFTA. .They are yet to be accorded a seat on the negotiating table.32 33 One reason for lack
of effectiveness of private sector in SAARC can be its nature. Diversity leads to lack of consensus among
players in the private sector.
Track 4: Private Citizen or Peacemaking through Personal Involvement
‗Citizen diplomacy‘ is defined as people-to-people diplomacy undertaken by both individuals and
NGOs. ….Proponents of citizen diplomacy claim that …these dialogues are based on perspectives which
criticize the official policies by questioning the priorities and assumptions of the official decision making
circles. ..The ultimate objective …is the promotion of social transformation. Indeed, the history of engagement
of citizens‘ groups …predates the rise of Track 2.33 34 While discussing the appropriateness of this track, Davies
and Kaufman stress that it has developed in response to the profound challenges that ….complex conflicts
present to all those working to build a sustainable and just peace…….citizen diplomacy empowers those most
impacted to participate in the search for peace (Davies and Kaufman 2002 :2)
Citizen diplomacy in SAARC Many influential citizens have proved that they can make the difference so far
as promoting regional cooperation or conflict resolution is concerned. Some track four actors of SAARC 34 35
include H.T. Parekh, Dinesh Singh, Dr. Ponna Wignaraja, O.P. Shah, Bose and Hasan ,Rajive 35 Ganguli; few
names in the list of people known for their supernumerary performance in promoting people to people contacts
in South Asia.
Youth
The role of younger generation was stressed in Inaugral address of a conference (SAARC 2015 organised by
FES) by Sh. I.K. Gujral. ―A new generation of the professionals, policy makers and actors and agencies are fast
taking over the entire operations in the region. This generation has no baggage of mistrust, suspicions and low
confidence. They are what our Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh calls ―the people who think out of the box‖. 36 36 Keeping in account the potential hidden in youth for peace building, many dialogues have been aimed at
them. Says Faiz, ―The Summer school is one such initiative which attempted to engage the younger generation
of South Asia in dialogues and communications. Prior to this, unofficial dialogues had a ‗generational
vacuum‘. …The Regional Center for Strategic Studies (RCSS) also started a parallel process of workshops and
dialogues involving the younger generation of South Asian scholars and opinion makers. Outside South Asia,
the Henry L. Stimson Center in Washington and the Program in Arms Control, Disarmament and International
Security at the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign have also been the venues for young South Asians to
engage in dialogue and research on issues relating to regional stability and security….‖
29 Supra no.20
30 Cited in Nesadurai 2010
31 Supra no.28
32 Ibid
33 Supra no 29
34 Sources of Parekh, Singh,Wignaraja,Shah & Bose and Hasan (Waslekar 1995)
35 Elbinger 2007
36 FES 2007
R. Gupta et al., American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(1), June-August, 2013, pp. 50-
65
AIJRHASS 13-212; © 2013, AIJRHASS All Rights Reserved Page 56
As observed by Manjari Sewak (Sewak 2006) 37 37, third generation Indians and Pakistanis (in the age group of
22-40 years) are beginning to bridge the divide of deep hostility and distrust that separated their parents and
grandparents…
Beena Sarwar (1997)38 38lists technological advances that break down the barriers between
antagonists such as television, the internet and email as important factors in the creation of cultural
understanding. …..―Thank God for email," Sarwar quotes a journalist participating at an Indo-Pak forum held in
Lahore in November 1995. ….It is precisely the sort of collaboration described by Sewak and the cross-border
communication documented by Sarwar that is needed to counteract and heal the wounds of Partition.39
39.Ahmed and Das show the significance of an informed public to change the cold war mind-set in India and
Pakistan. (Ahmed and Das 1998 )
That the cross border citizen dialogues between India and Pakistan have succeeded in doing what official and
semi-official dialogues couldn‘t, finds mention in a detailed analysis of these dialogues by Faiz. It deals with
these initiatives since independence. Some of these initiatives are India–Pakistan Friendship Society, Pakistan
India People‘s Forum for Peace and Democracy (PIPFPD),Expatriate Indians and Pakistanis, The India-Pakistan
Soldier‘s Initiative for Peace (IPSI), Anti-nuclear initiatives: Pakistan Peace Coalition (PPC), Movement
Against Nuclear Weapons (MANW), Movement in India for Nuclear Disarmament (MIND),(CNDP), lndian
Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW), The Indian Doctors for Peace and Development (IDPD)
and the Pakistani Doctors for Peace and Development (PDPD)…. Apart from this, some other initiatives include
Doon School Old Boys‘ Society and The Pakistan-India People's Solidarity Conference.(Behera 2002)
Official steps towards people to people contacts
Indo-Pakistan ….. dialogues on strategic issues contributed to build confidence among key actors of both the
countries. The Indo-Pakistan Bus diplomacy…. has become an emblem of the hope for peace and friendship
between two countries …40 40
Speech by Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh on the launch of Amritsar – Nankana Sahib Bus Service,
Amritsar (2006): “ I hope this bus service opens yet another chapter in improving the relations between our two
countries. …As an ancient saying goes, a road is made by walking. I am happy that we are moving forward and
creating a road, one step after another, even though many hurdles have come up along the way…...‖ 41 41
In an attempt to remove barriers to people to people interaction,recently (Feb. 2011),SAARC countries approved
a proposal to exempt 19 categories of people from visa requirement and agreed on a liberalised scheme …..(The
Hindu, Feb. 2011 )…..If one were to look at connectivity with Pakistan, some of the important steps have been
implementing the NDA government‘s idea of increasing connectivity between Rajasthan and Sind, the two
Kashmirs and the two Punjabs. Connectivity with Bangladesh and Bhutan has also gone up by road.( Yhome
and Maini 2011)
Official obstacles
Shahid Kardar argues that the biggest factor standing in the way of people-to-people contact in South Asia is the
negative perceptions about each other rooted in history……He categorises these obstacles to people to people
contact as perceptual, legislative and procedural.( Kardar (2000): 87-116 ). A critical evaluation of citizen
diplomacy is being done by Navnita Behera who argues that the most ironic fact is the inability of people to
influence the policy-making agenda. …In this regard, Behera calls for the exploration of a ‗post-modernist
agenda‘, ‗a bottom-up approach‘ in which civil society plays a more significant role…..42 42 In a related study,
Timsina argues: ―It is unfortunate that the rulers of countries of this region have kept the people apart through
the creation of walls of suspicion, hostility, intolerance, dis- and misinformation and the prevention of
interaction amongst the people in order to maintain control over their societies‖…..(Timsina 2010). These
official barriers to people to-people contact, (in particular visa regime) have been severely criticised. ―As a
result, succeeding generations of Indians and Pakistanis have little or no first-hand knowledge of each other,
which perpetuates images based on hostility and suspicion. ……‖ 43 43
Diaspora
37 Cited in Elbinger 2007
38 Ibid
39 Supra No. 35
40Dahal
41Cited in Salik 2006
42 Cited in Faiz
43 Ahmed and Das 1998
R. Gupta et al., American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(1), June-August, 2013, pp. 50-
65
AIJRHASS 13-212; © 2013, AIJRHASS All Rights Reserved Page 57
When we talk of citizen diplomacy, the diasporas are not to be ignored. ….When we talk about the South Asian
diaspora, we mean people of South Asian descent who are not living in their original homeland….( South Asian
Concern 2010).The Diaspora …could be more constructively engaged, for example, as a Diaspora think tank
( Reychler). The South Asian diasporas are at an important crossroad. They are no longer made up of low skill
workers …Some of the newer diasporas from South Asia were formed by professionals …The per capita
incomes of these people are much more than that of the local populations. (Burki 2011 ).The South Asian
Diasporas and workers have become life-blood for the economic resilience of the region. 4444
As is now well-documented, the Sikh separatist movement in Punjab has received much institutional and
financial support from Sikh militants in the United States…….( Lal 1999:42-48). RajaSingam (2011) discusses
the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora‘s role in Tamil nationalism. Similarly, Kashmiri diaspora has been said to have
helped keep the issue alive internationally. (ICG Asia Report N°79 p.27)
Track five: Research, training and education
It is perhaps unique among the tracks of diplomacy that even when states are in deep conflict …exchange of
scholars to enable mutual learning often continues. ……Because of this, scholars have had what amounts to a
‗diplomatic immunity‘ in carrying out scholarly exchange. (Cuthbert 2005). Think tanks have existed since the
early part of the last century when the Brookings Institution, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,
Chatham House and the Kiel Institute for the World Economy were established to bring knowledge to bear on
government decision making.(McGann 2009). To quote Diamond and McDonald: ―This is a particularly vibrant
component of the Multi-Track Diplomacy community. …from which much of the conflict resolution theory and
practice is coming;45 45
The main think tanks of South Asia 46 include South Asia Network of Economic Research Institutes (SANEI),
Regional Centre for Strategic Studies (RCSS) , Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS ) The Centre for
South Asian Studies (CSAS), Coalition for Action on South Asian Cooperation (CASAC), CPR. India
Bangladesh Dialogue, The South Asia Centre for Policy Studies (SACEPS), South Asian Policy Analysis
(SAPANA), The Consortium of South Asian Think Tanks (COSATT), AMDISA and Panos South Asia . Some
of these think tanks, through research, advocacy and useful inputs to different summits and other facets of
official diplomacy have shouldered their way through the crowd of failures confronting the organisation. The
Pugwash conference on Kashmir (Dec. 2004) is creditable to IPCS.47.SAPANA‘s being the first ―virtual‖
institution is its distinguishing feature.48.Each such institute has a distinct identity, thus adding credibility to its
existence.
Track Six Diplomacy: Activism
Diamond and McDonald relate that ―The primary task of the activist community is to change institutions,
attitudes, and policies through political action.‖….. 4946
Civil society and peace building
Civil society plays an important role in encouraging the cessation of armed conflict, and constitutes a vital force
in post-conflict recovery. The role played by civil society in war and post-war contexts is increasingly
acknowledged internationally…. In post-conflict recovery, civil society actors have considerable potential. A
main element in Afghanistan‘s post-9/11 agenda, for example, is to provide cash grants to traditional village
councils (shuras), while insisting - contrary to tradition – that shura members are elected by secret ballot (Berg
and Kjellman 2004 )…..The functional approach to Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) states seven civil
society peacebuilding functions. These are : Protection, Monitoring/early warning, Advocacy/ public
communication, Socialization, Social cohesion, Intermediation/ facilitation and Service provision (World
Bank 2006)
On the other hand, the civil society may sometimes jeopardize the situation instead of improving it.
―….The relationship between civil society and peacebuilding is complex, and working with civil society groups
in peacetime is quite different than during or following armed conflict…..Conflict disrupts the relationship
between civil society, the state, and the market…. In many cases, there will develop an economic sector that
44 Supra no.40
45 Cited in Cuthbert 2005
46 (Source: Home pages of different think tanks, accessed March 2011)
47 Baba 2005
48 Alam 2006
49 Supra No. 46
R. Gupta et al., American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(1), June-August, 2013, pp. 50-
65
AIJRHASS 13-212; © 2013, AIJRHASS All Rights Reserved Page 58
operates parallel to the legal financial market (Strand et al 2003).5047…Notions of civil society thus need to be
tempered by the reality that they contain the potential for socalled ―spoilers.‖ …Well-meaning policy that does
not incorporate an understanding of the roles civil society can play runs the risk of strengthening its uncivil
rather than civil components (Maley & Saikal 2002) 514849.
Non-governmental organisations (NGOs)
NGOs are a factor in some international negotiations…They attempt to reach government delegates wherever
they may be accessible… Some NGO representatives are even occasionally invited to make presentations in the
course of the official proceedings. (Feilleux 2009 )…..There are big international NGOs (BINGOs), national
NGOs (NNGOs), and local NGOs (LNGOs) .GONGOs, or government organized NGOs, often refers to NGOs
in the former Soviet bloc or China today but are different from QUANGOS, or the quasi-nongovernmental
organizations that describe Canadian or Western European NGOs… DONGOs, or donor organized NGOs, are
those established, but not necessarily controlled, by public or private donor organizations (Martens 2005: 31). 5250…..Given the heterogeneity of NGOs in terms of size and organizational character, this can be thought of as a
hybrid of Track II and Track III diplomacy. (Crow and Singh 2008 ) NGOs are often excellent sources of
information on situations and developments on the ground in early warning ..(Bakker).
NGOs in South Asia
……South Asia has a vibrant civil society movement and large number of active Non-Government
Organizations (NGOs), often with a sense of mission and commitment to justice and service to the
community. ….. …. Recently, some NGOs have focused towards conflict resolution. The NGO-government
relationship is less confrontational and more complementary. ….. The NGO movement across South Asia has
significant difference in characteristics such as numbers of NGOs, their distribution across each country, their
coverage in terms of local, national, regional and global issues, their capacity to deliver services, advocacy role
and national and international impacts of their activities.The representation of South Asian NGOs is poor at the
global level in many respects. ….There has been beginning of regional or national NGO networks such as
Climate Action Network South Asia for Climate Change issues, but the voices are disproportionately small for
the need of proper representation. … However there are some key research NGOs who are widely respected in
the global community. These include BCAS, BRAC, Grameen Bank in Dhaka, Development Alternative (DA),
Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), Tata Energy Research Institute (TERI) in Delhi, Cuts in Kolkata,
Swaminathan Foundation in Chennai, Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) and IUCN in Pakistan,
Environmental Law Foundation in SriLanka, ICIMOD in Kathmundu, to mention a few. ….(Rahman 2002 )
In some of the conflictual situations, the NGOs have very vital role both in its management and resolution. In
other cases, they have acted as major agents in preventive diplomacy. Many of these non-state actors advocate
and advance regionalism for varied reasons. They exert a lot of pressure on official institutions at different
levels..(Lama)
Advocacy
With Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Keck and Sikkink1998)53 51,
Margaret Keck and Kathryn Sikkink established a new field of interdisciplinary research on the significance and
challenges of principled transnational organizing. ………The core resource of advocacy networks is information,
which is usually collected on the local level, transmitted to allies abroad, and then published in reports and
testimonies in order to mobilize moral outrage against human rights violations. …. Finally, advocacy networks
hold governments directly accountable ….( Schmitz ). They …. classify and formulate the tactics those groups
utilize: ―information politics,‖ ―symbolic politics,‖ ―leverage politics,‖ and ―accountability politics.‖ (Cakmak ).
A significant example of advocacy is the pressure by the civil society on their respective governments to
evolve legal provisions to curb the menace of trafficking of the girl child and women in South Asia. It was this
networking among civil society organizations and activists which resulted in pressurizing the SAARC leaders to
sign a Convention to fight this critical problem in the eleventh SAARC summit held in Kathmandu in early
2002 (Ahmed and Bhatnagar 2008 ).
50 Cited in Berg and Kjellman 2004
51 Ibid
52 Cited in Mc Mahon
53 Cited by Schmitz
R. Gupta et al., American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(1), June-August, 2013, pp. 50-
65
AIJRHASS 13-212; © 2013, AIJRHASS All Rights Reserved Page 59
Some track six actors in South Asia include SAP-I 54 52 ( known for parallel summitry), People‘s SAARC,
Sangat 55 , Simorgh 5653 and Shirkat Gah .The first People‘s SAARC meeting had taken place in New Delhi in
July of 1995, as a parallel event to the 8th official SAARC summit (Pyakurel 2010 ). In Pakistan Shirkat Gah
was given the task of monitoring the implementation of the SAARC Social Charter (initiated by SACEPS).…
(Mumtaz and Abdullah 2006 ). Much has been done with regard to peace activism in which various labour
organisations among others have hit the road to success. The Action Aid Pakistan is making a valuable
contribution to the peace movement by sponsoring numerous people-to-people dialogues. (5754) Among peace
initiatives, recently, a Peace moot was organized by Sindh Sufi Institute. (Nangiana 2011). In human rights
activism and lobbying,Forum-Asia(Deuja 2010), SAFHR (5855), SAARC people‘s forum (5956) and SAHRDC 6057 have successfully got rid of some of the ineradicable ills of the society. South Asian Watch on Trade,
Economy and Environment (SAWTEE), PANOS-South Asia, Consumer Unity and Trust Society of India
(CUTS), Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SPDI), etc continue to organize significant dialogues and
publications to raise environmental consciousness ….61 58
Track Seven Diplomacy: Religion
Religious diplomacy, or ―faith in action‖, is an effort by the worldwide religious community of many
denominations to teach (or remind) people of the world that religion and belief systems are founded on peace
and love rather than violence and war….. Practitioners of religious diplomacy must walk a fine line at times.62
59 Track Seven successes are …the success stories of person-to-person interaction that brings goodwill and
understanding to the parties involved. 6360 One could say that religion has always played a significant role in
public life …While this is no doubt true, it is also the case that religion has taken a back seat politically ever
since the secular values of the European Enlightenment were imposed on Western societies in the eighteenth
century ….(Masuzawa 2005)64 61
A study of Iraq and Afghanistan demonstrates that military chaplains, as
clergy and officers, occupy a unique space that blends a secular status and a religious one, making them well
suited to serve as intermediaries between military and religious leaders in areas of conflict and post conflict
stabilization……. ( Adams 2006 )
Reigious organizations are a rich source of peace services…. Religions contribute to peace-building …(Life and
Peace Report, 1990) 65 62.. ……… Efforts could be of a traditional diplomatic nature or be categorized as Track
II or Field diplomacy ( Reychler). ‗ Faith-Based Diplomacy‘, a seminar for the Kashmir peace process resulted
in many fruitful discussions…. ( Philpott and Cox 2006 ). In a conference ‗Anatomy of Religious Conflict in
South and Southeast Asia‘(2005) ,the religious conflicts of South and South East Asia were widely discussed.
In general, if we sit musing on the history of conflicts anywhere in the world, it has a lot to do with religious
fundamentalism. In an essay, using the Punjab conflict as a case study, Thomas provides a theoretical model of
dispute resolution and crisis management for conflicts in which one major actor can be described as religiously
fundamentalist..…….( Thomas 1999). A study carried out by Cooperation for Peace and Unity (CPAU) on ‗the
role and functions of religious civil society in Afghanistan: case studies from sayedabad & kunduz‘, shows: ―In
Afghanistan, relations between the government and religious actors and religious actors with other civil society
players, are complex. Throughout the history, governments have sought its approval, and even existence, from
religious authorities. In return religious actors function as advisors to the government. ….‖ (CPAU 2007). In
the South Asian Journal conference ―Envisioning South Asia‖, in April 2006 in Islamabad, the ‗Group on
Religious Extremism and Minorities‘ argued that both minority persecution and ghettoisation have to be
countered. 66 63 In this regard, Chandran (2009) while examplifying Baba Chamliyal Mela along the
international border suggests that more such regional festivals and border melas could be organized …all along
the LoC. Inter-religious dialogues and peace movements of civil societies in South Asia have a manifest desire
54 Source: Ahmed and Bhatnagar 2008
55 Home page accessed
56 Waslekar 1995
57Faiz
58 Ibid
59 Nesadurai 2010
60 Supra no.57
61 Supra no.44
62 Cuthbert 2005
63 Ibid
64 Cited in Global Civil Society Year Book 2006-07 (chapter 6)
65 Cited in Reychler
66 Supra no.48
R. Gupta et al., American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(1), June-August, 2013, pp. 50-
65
AIJRHASS 13-212; © 2013, AIJRHASS All Rights Reserved Page 60
to end insurgency and counter-insurgency operations in the region. …to turn the region into a peaceful
community. ….6764 One instance of religion having bound relations between two neighbours, India and
Pakistan has been the Kartarpur Marg – Peace Corridor of sikh community of the two neighbours.. …..(IMTD
2010 )
Track Eight Diplomacy: Funding
Track Eight Overview
Track Eight diplomats are the philanthropists of the world. Often these are private individuals or foundations,
but also included are such agencies as the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the U.S. Agency for
International Development, and like chartered organizations. ….6865
Funding agencies in South Asia IMTD69, ADB ( e.g.The SASEC Information Highway Project 70, RETA 6417 (SANIE), USIS and some US
foundations, 7166
FES72,7367 and The Henry L. Stimson Center 74 in Washington, DC. The centre has extensive
experience in the promotion of Confidence Building Measures (CBMs) for the purpose of reducing regional
tension. 7568
So, as the literature suggests, much of the funding of nonofficial dialogues continues to originate outside the
region ….Some dialogues have simply died after the foreign funding ceased. South Asia Dialogues is a case in
point. A counterexample is that of the Neemrana Dialogue….. 7669
Track Nine Diplomacy: Communications and the Media
Overview
Diamond and McDonald state that ―The primary task of the communications field is to use print, visual, and
electronic media to inform and engage the public on issues relating to peace, conflict resolution, and
international relations.‖ ….77 70 The media‚ as it exists today is a vast and complex organism that means
different things to different people. ..it is looked at as a platform for self-expression.(Muralidharan )
The literature is replete with Television journalism during terror attacks (Mogensen 2008), the agenda-setting
role of the mass media in the shaping of public opinion (McCombs ), Media and conflict transformation
{ (Jager & Link 1993; Van Dijk 1997).78 71I (Terzis 2000) 79 72. (Botes 1996). 8073}, Media broker diplomacy
(Gilboa 2005 ) and of late, Social Media as a new Track of MTD (Gamaghelyan 2011 ). The news media‘s role
in diplomacy has been discussed in Indian context by Rai. (2003). (Joshi 2001 ) deals with the Agra Summit,
having got extraordinary media attention. The NGO Search for Common Ground, through its Radio Soap
Operas has contributed to tolerance education 81. But media has not been able to gear itself up for meeting the
challenges faced by the civil society in South Asia. This has been discussed by Bhasin (2011). Mass Media in
South Asia is nation-based and primarily state-linked or state-biased ( Gunasekera 2002 ). The youth have been
the major victims of this biased ness of the media. Argues Shah (1997): ―…Curricula act as instrumental tools
of state policy for shaping the minds of future generations. …Hierarchical decisions take precedence over
personal ones. These colonial organizations have an exclusive corporate mind-set that defines the value system
of their personnel.‖ As is generally observed, one of the problems related to this field is that the media has a
preference for 'bad news' above 'good news'( IMTD 2011 ). To undo it, radio can prove to be an effective means
of communication, when it comes to reaching the hearts of the grass roots..(Islam 2011)
67 Supra no.61
68 Supra no.63
69 Source: IMTD 2008
70 Source: Asian Development Bank 2007 (Cited in Pradhan and Liyanage)
71 Source: Waslekar 1995
72 Waslekar 1995 discusses its role in CASAC
73 Its useful inputs to 14th summit find mention in FES (2007)
74 Krepon and Haider 2004
75 Supra No. 39
76 Behera 2002
77 Cited in Cuthbert 2005
78 Cited in Melone et al, 2002
79 Ibid.
80 Ibid
81 Burgess and Burgess 2010.
R. Gupta et al., American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(1), June-August, 2013, pp. 50-
65
AIJRHASS 13-212; © 2013, AIJRHASS All Rights Reserved Page 61
Although track nine is the innermost circle, joining all other tracks, it has different roles to play in the different
tracks. It is often surrounded by the controversial issue of whether the mumbo-jumbo of official diplomacy
should be done with or without media. As Kappereler puts it, ―from confidential diplomacy is becoming public.‖
Whatever approach is taken to the media, everyone involved in a process—including the media—should clearly
understand what can be publicized and what cannot, and why. If the media understand the importance of
keeping some issues private, they will be more likely …to respect that privacy. 82 The print and electronic media
are often the best partners in any good advocacy campaign…. Quality and reliable information is the life-blood
of advocacy campaigns. 83 74.
Some track nine actors of South Asia having spared no pains (to ensure that the hatred for the ‗other‘ is undone
root and branch) include: Some one time regional conferences on strategic issues by Time Magazine and the
Frontier Post, (Lahore) 8475, Aman Ki Asha85, The Centre for Media and Cultural Studies (CMCS),86 South
Asia Free Media Association (SAFMA), South Asia Media Commission (SAMC)87 and The Media South Asia
Project. 88 Some unofficial … activities have attempted to bridge the information gap between the independent
Pakistani and Indian press media…. 8976 The information deficit in the region was addressed In the South Asian
Journal conference ―Envisioning South Asia‖, facilitated by SAFMA, on 29-30 April 2006 in Islamabad. Given
the rising numbers of South Asian Cyber citizenry, there is an urgent need to upgrade, integrate and facilitate
cyber connectivity and accessibility. 90 77. When it comes to the joint initiatives with regard to media, one of the
success stories is SAFMA, 91 78 having a lot to its credit.. Besides, Panos South Asia and Himal Southasian
have been bringing together top media editors from India, Pakistan and Afghanistan for an open, informal and
informed sharing of experience and information. (Himal 2011).
Recently the public opinion of the Kashmir peace process was sought in Jammu..…..Academician Radha Kumar,
one of the three interlocutors, told that the "biggest commonality that has been found across the state is that the
people want a permanent and irreversible solution to the Kashmir crisis".
(Pargal 2011 )
Additional tracks:
People Building Peace recognizes Women, Arts, Sports as additional tracks .
Women and peacebuilding
Be it reconciliation, and reconstruction.(Marshall 2000), Bonn negotiations(Governance and Social
Development Resource Centre 2009 ), or the issue of being given a voice at the negotiating table (Women &
War: Power and Protection in the 21st Century) or supporting networks of women peacebuilders (Marshall et al
2011), women have started being recognized as peacebuilders. South Asia is no exception. ….Over the years,
irrespective of political upheavals, women have persistently engaged in dialogue and communication across the
border. (Faiz). Their role in peace building and post conflict reconstruction in Afghanistan, Sri Lanka and
Nepal has been stressed upon by Rita Manchanda(2005).
Women‘s Initiative for Peace in South Asia (WIPSA),92 79Women‘s Action Forum (WAF),93 Women in
Security, Conflict Management and Peace (WISCOMP),94 80Feminist writers,95 81 and Foundation of SAARC
Writers and Literature (FOSWAL)96, 97 82 are some peacebuilders of this track in South Asia.
Arts and Culture/ cultural diplomacy
82 Ibid
83 Rahman 2002
84 Supra no.71
85 The News International, Feb. 2010
86 Home page, accessed April 2011
87 SAFMA publication
88 Home page, accessed July 2011
89 Supra No. 43
90 Supra No.66
91 A detailed analysis of its achievements is done by Faiz
92 Peace bus and other initiatives (Faiz)
93 Ibid
94 WISCOMP Update 2005
95 Supra no.93
96 Ibid
97 FOSWAL has a diversified role.Its establishment is creditable to Mrs. Ajeet Kour .
R. Gupta et al., American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(1), June-August, 2013, pp. 50-
65
AIJRHASS 13-212; © 2013, AIJRHASS All Rights Reserved Page 62
If properly introduced, …culture helps remove the feeling of formality that often blankets diplomatic
gatherings…. A growing number of states acknowledge that culture is a high priority in diplomatic
relations.‖(livemint.com, Aug.15, 2011) Culture is the subliminal third leg of international diplomacy, the first
two being politics and economics.(Ghose 2010 ) ―Cultural diplomacy has become important as we seek to
strengthen and reinforce people to people contact transcending political barriers,‖ said Mukherjee.(Express
News Service, June 2008 ).
The artist community of India and Pakistan has been in the vanguard of citizen peace diplomacy. As in other
regions of the world, music, dance, the visual and performing arts have been able to reach out across the
region…. Through their performances, these groups have …emphasized the need to resolve conflicts so as to
divert energies towards the welfare of the people.98 83. In this regard, the ‗First SAARC cultural festival,99
Indian Council of World Affairs (ICWA ),100 ,Tehrik-e-Niswan of Pakistan,101 84 and Ajoka Theatre Group10285
have brought off the tasks left unfinished by the official actors. In recent years, the Peace conferences103,104 are
success stories in themselves .
Sports
In Sports, the generally talked about issue is that of cricket diplomacy between the two biggest members of
SAARC. Comments like ‗cricket-inspired diplomatic thaw‘(The Hindustan Times, The Express Tribune, April
24th, 2011) are quite common. Cricket diplomacy may prove to be an effective tool to lever the crates of
friendship and cooperation open. As comments Mehta (2011): ―When India and Pakistan can play cricket, why
can‘t they undertake trade?‖
III. Conclusion
This paper was centred on the the eight sub tracks of unofficial diplomacy ( as provided by the multitrack
diplomacy model) and some additional tracks like track one and a half, women, arts and sports. It has been tried
to take a long look at the situation in general and in particular in SAARC. This is a new facet of SAARC, a
SAARC by the people (youth, women, artists, writers, citizens, think tanks, NGOs, media, religious bodies and
all that jazz). The way these non-state actors have stood by the cause of regional cooperation and beyond that
i.e. their contribution in spawning a general support for one ‗South Asia‘ speak well for themselves, given that
it was not of yore that the first unofficial dialogue got itself recognized.
References
Acharya, Amitav (2011) ―Engagement or Entrapment? Scholarship and Policymaking on Asian Regionalism‖, International
Studies Review 13, 12-17.
Adams, George. (2006) ―Chaplains as Liaisons with Religious Leaders :Lessons from Iraq and Afghanistan‖, USIP Peaceworks
No. 56.
Ahmed, Samina and Suranjan Das (1998) ― Movements of People, Ideas, Trade, and Technology: Toward a Peaceful
Coexistence of India and Pakistan‖, SAND98-0505/3
Alam, Imtiaz ed. (2006) ed. SAPANA South Asian Studies VolumeV: Energy Cooperation in South Asia, June.
Algappa, Muthiah ed.(2003)Asian Security Order :Institutional and normative features (Stanford :Stanford University Press)
247.(limited preview available online)
―Anatomy of Religious Conflict in South and Southeast Asia,‖ (2005) Conference organised by Institute of Defence and
Strategic Studies (IDSS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 3-4 May.
‗An assembly towards a union of South Asian peoples (21-23 April 2010, Delhi ): Hundreds of South Asians attend Peoples
SAARC conference‘. (Home Page, Sangat).
Asian Development Bank (ADB) and Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) (2010) ―Key Proposals
for Harnessing Business Opportunities in South Asia‖,3 March .
Asian Development Bank. (2007) ― South Asia Sub regional Economic Cooperation Information Highway Project‖ Retrieved
15 April 2008 (by the author).
Baba, Noor Ahmad (2005) ―Pugwash conference on Kashmir :some reflections‖, IPCS# 1620, 2Jan.
Background paper ―Active role of Non-State Actors‖ (2006)in Regional Conference on ‗expansion of SAARC :challenges and
opportunities‘, organised by the Institute of Foreign Affairs (IFA) and FES, 29-30 June, Lalitpur.
Bailes, John Gooneratne, Mavara Inayat, Jamshed Ayaz Khan and Swaran Singh (2007) ―Regionalism and Security building:
Regionalism in South Asian Diplomacy‖, SIPRI Policy Paper No. 15, 2007 Stockholm International Peace Research Institute,
Sweden.
98 Supra No. 96
99 SAARC bands festival 2007
100 Suhrawardy
101 Supra No. 98
102 Ibid
103 Sufism for peace, India International Centre, 2006.
104 Budhism for peace, India International Centre, 2009.
R. Gupta et al., American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(1), June-August, 2013, pp. 50-
65
AIJRHASS 13-212; © 2013, AIJRHASS All Rights Reserved Page 63
Bakker, Edwin ―Early Warning by NGOs in conflict areas‖.
Behera, Navnita Chadha (2002) ― Forging New Solidarities: Nonofficial Dialogues‖ in Searching for Peace in Central and South
Asia .
Behera, Navnita Chadha (2009) ―SAARC Beyond Civil Society and Regional Integration in South Asia‖, SACEPS Paper No. 19
(supported by the Asian Development Bank under (RETA 6417): Supporting Network of Research Institutes and Think Tanks in
South Asia Phase II South Asia Centre for Policy Studies (SACEPS)), Kathmandu, Nepal, September.
Behera, Navnita Chadha. (2008) ― SAARC and Beyond :Civil Society and Regional Integration in South Asia‖ ,SACEPS Paper
No. 8, Kathmandu.
Berghof Foundation for Peace Support (2007) ― Track 1.5 Approaches to Conflict Management :Assessing Good Practice and
Areas for Improvement. ‗Lessons Learned‘ Retreat‖, Schloss Hueningen, March 4-6.
Bhasin, Madhavi (2011) ―Digital neighbourhood‖ Himal March.
Botes, J. (1996), ―Journalism and Conflict Resolution‖, Media Development, 43( 4) 6-10.
Bulwaka, Michael (2009) ―Diaspora Diplomacy: A Case Study Of Uganda‖, a dissertation presented to the Faculty of Arts in the
University of Malta for the degree of Master in Contemporary Diplomacy, July.
Burgess, Heidi and Guy Burgess (2010) ― Conducting Track II Peacemaking‖ The Peacemakers Toolkit Series ,United States
Institute of Peace, Washington, D.C.
Burki ,Shahid Javed (2011) ― South Asian Diasporas: Agents of Change in a Poorly Integrated Region‖ ISAS Special report No.
03,19July.
Cakmak, Cenap ―Civil Society Actors In International Law And World Politics: definition, Conceptual Framework, Problems‖.
Carvalho, Vanessa Roque de (2010) ―A Critical Descriptive Analysis Of The Role Of Track I And Track II Diplomatic
Interventions: The Case Of The Democratic Republic Of Congo (1998-2002)‖, Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the
requirements for the degree of Master in International Studies at Stellenbosch University, March.
Chandran, D Suba (2010) ―Indo-Pak Nuclear Commission :A SWOT Analysis‖ IPCS #3279, 11 November.
Chandran, D. Suba (2009) ― Expanding Cross-LoC Interactions : Perspectives from India,‖ IPCS Issue Brief 131, September.
Chigas, D. 2003. Track II (Citizen) Diplomacy. [Online]
Available:<http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/track2_diplomacy/>. [27 March 2009]. UC-900, March , Cooperative
Monitoring Center Occasional Paper/3.
Cooperation for Peace and Unity (CPAU) (2007) ―The Role And Functions Of Religious Civil Society In Afghanistan : Case
Studies From Sayedabad & Kunduz‖, July.
Crow, Ben and Nirvikar Singh (2008) ―The management of inter-state rivers as demands grow and supplies tighten: India, China,
Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh‖, University of California, Santa Cruz, MPRA Paper No. 12433.
Cuthbert, Randall (2005), ― North Korea: The Potential Application of Multi-Track Diplomacy to Conflict Resolution and Peace
Building‖, IMTD Occasional Paper Number 16, April.
Dahal,Dev Raj ―Track II Diplomacy in South Asia :Limits and Possibilities for Regional Cooperation‖.
Davies, John L. and Edward Kaufman ed.(2002)Second Track/ Citizens Diplomacy :Concepts and Techniques for Conflict
Transformation (USA: Rowman and Littlefield publishers) 2. (limited preview available online)
Deuja, Surya (2010) ―Establishing a Robust Regional Human Rights Mechanism in South Asia‖ Asian Human Rights Defender
Main Feature :A regional human rights mechanism for South Asia 6( 1 ) 4-7.
Dixit, Kanak Mani, (2005) ―Within Grasp : Persian Gas for the South Asian Engine‖, Himal, July-August .
Durrani, Mahmud Ali ed. (2001) India and Pakistan: The Cost of Conflict and the Benefits of Peace Oxford : Oxford University
Press.
Elbinger,Lewis K. (2007) ―The United States Of South Asia :healing The Wounds Of Partition‖ A Research Report Submitted to
the Faculty In Partial Fulfillment of the Graduation Requirements, Air War College, Air University FS-01, U.S. Department of
State, February.
Evans, Paul (ed.), Studying Asia Pacific Security Toronto: University of Toronto, York University Joint Centre for Asia Pacific
Studies, 1994.
Excerpts from the 9th Panos- Himal Roundtable ―Challenges and opportunities for lasting peace in-India, Pakistan and
Afghanistan‖ held on 2-3 October 2010, Belgium Himal January 2011.
Express News Service (2008) ―Cultural diplomacy important for people-to-people contact‖Posted Jun 02.
Faiz, Asma-Ul-Husna ―India Pakistan Dialogue: Bringing the Society in‖, RCSS Policy Studies 39.
FES(2007): ―SAARC: Slow Progress and Uncertain Prospects‖, Background paper 3 of the Conference on ‗SAARC 2015:
Expanding Horizons and forging Cooperation in a Resurgent Asia‘, FES, New Delhi, February.
Gamaghelyan, Phil (2011) ―Social Media :A New Track of Multi-Track Diplomacy‖ July 1,Caucasus edition, Journal of
Conflict transformation .
Ghose, Anindita (2010), ― The govt realizes the value of cultural diplomacy: Singh on ICCR‘s rapid expansion under his tenure
and the organization‘s conscious Look East strategy‖, Hindustan Times Posted Sat, Nov 13
Ghosh, Gautam (2006) ―Private sector and conflict management‖ in Regional Conference on ‗expansion of SAARC :challenges
and opportunities‘, organised by the Institute of Foreign Affairs (IFA) and FES, 29-3June, Lalitpur.
Gilboa, Eytan (2005) ―Media-Broker Diplomacy: When Journalists Become Mediators‖, Critical Studies in Media
Communication 22( 2): 99-120.
Gunasekera, Laxman (2002) (a speaker) in ‗Second South Asian People Summit Inaugural Public Meeting‘ January 3, Nepal .
Harpviken, Kristian Berg and Kjell Erling Kjellman (2004) ― Beyond Blue prints: Civil Society and peace building‖, concept
paper commissioned by the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD) Aug.
Heiling, Robert M.(2007) ― Conflict Resolution in Aceh in Light of Track One and a Half Diplomacy‖ ASEAS 1 (2) (Retrieved
Nov 02, 2008, from http://www.berghof-peacesupport.org/publications/)
Hicks, Donna and William Weisberg ― PICAR Sri Lanka Problem-Solving Project‖, chapter 5 in David Smock ed. Private
Peacemaking USIP-Assisted Peacemaking Projects of Nonprofit Organizations.
Hindustan Times (2011) ―Cricket-diplomacy-back-channel-diplomacy-initiated-months-ago‖, April 24.
IMTD Annual Report 2008
―India/Pakistan Relations and Kashmir :Steps Toward Peace‖, ICG Asia Report N0 79, 24 June 2004.
Islam, Sheikh Mohammad Shafiul (2011) ―Role of Radio in Peace Building Process in South Asia‖, Association for Progressive
Communications (APC).
Joshi, Hemant (2001) ― Media and Summit Diplomacy‖ suite 101.com 27Jul .
R. Gupta et al., American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(1), June-August, 2013, pp. 50-
65
AIJRHASS 13-212; © 2013, AIJRHASS All Rights Reserved Page 64
Kardar, Shahid (2000) ―People to People Contact in South Asia :Scope and Constraints‖ in Behera, Navnita Chadha ., Victor
Gunawardena, Shahid Kardar and Raisul Awal Mahmood ed. People to People Contact in South Asia (New Delhi : Manohar
Publishers)
Kaye, Dalia Dassa. (2007) ―Talking to the Enemy: Track Two Diplomacy in the Middle East and South Asia,‖ Arlington, VA:
RAND Corporation.
Keck, M.E., and Sikkink, K. ed.(1998) Activists beyond Borders :Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca :Cornell
University Press.
Keet, Dot (2007) ―Alternative Regionalisms :Why and How?‖, Global Social Policy 2007; 7; 255.
Kelegama, Saman (2007) ― Towards Greater Economic Connectivity in South Asia‖, EPW, September 29.
Kelegama, Saman (2011) ―SAARC needs a major shake up‖ The Island, P.5, 27th September.
Lal, Vinay (1999) ― Establishing Roots, Engendering Awareness :A Political History of Asian Indians in the United States‖ in
Leela Prasad ed. Live Like the Banyan Tree :Images of the Indian American Experience (Philadelphia :Balch Institute for Ethnic
Studies) 42-48.
Lama (2006) in Regional Conference on expansion of SAARC :challenges and opportunities, organised by the Institute of
Foreign Affairs (IFA) and FES, 29-30 June, Lalitpur.
Lama, Mahendra P ―SAARC: Dynamics of Emerging New Regionalism‖.
Maley, William, and Amin Saikal. (2002) ―Civil Society and Reconstruction :Some Reflections‖ Afghanistan Info 7-8.
Manchanda, Rita (2005) Draft Version of Paper ―Women‘s Agency in peace Building and Gender relations in Post Conflict
Reconstrucion with attention to Afghanistan, Sri Lanka and Nepal‖, UNIFEM Working Paper 8.
Mapendere, J. (2000). ―Track One and a Half Diplomacy and the Complementarity of Tracks‖, Culture of Peace Online Journal,
2(1), 66-81. Retrieved May 29, 2008, from http://www.copoj.ca/pdfs/Jeffrey.pdfwww.copoj.ca/pdfs/Jeffrey.pdf.
Marshall , Katherine., Susan Hayward, Claudia Zambra, Esther Breger, and Sarah Jacksont (2011), ―Women in religious
Peacebuilding‖, USIP Peaceworks No. 71.
Marshall, Donna Ramsey (2000) ― Women in War and Peace: Grassroots Peacebuilding‖ USIP Peaceworks No. 34.
Martens, K., (2005) NGOs and the United Nations :Institutionalization, professionalization and adaptation New York: Palgrave.
Masuzawa,Tomoko(2005) The inventions of World religions or How European Universalism was preserved in the language of
pluralism , Chicago, University of Chicago press.
McCombs, Maxwell ed. (2004) The Agenda-Setting Role of the Mass Media in the Shaping of Public Opinion University of
Texas at Austin.
McDonald, J. W. (1996). Multi-Track Diplomacy, A Systems Approach to Peace. Sterling, VA. Kumarian Press.
McGann, James G., (2009) ― European Think Tanks: Regional And Trans-Atlantic Trends‖, The Think Tanks And Civil
Societies Program, September.
McMahon, Patrice ―NGOs and Peacebuilding: Challenges and choices for future research‖.
Mehta, Pradeep S. (2011) ―Building Peace through Trade :The Future of Indo-Pak Relations‖ Consumer Unity Trust Society
(CUTS), Jaipur.
Melone, Sandra D. Georgious Terzis and Ozsel Beleli (2002) ―Using the media for conflict transformation :the common ground
experience‖, Berghof Handbook for Conflict transformation, March.
Mogensen, Kirsten (2008) ―Media, War and Conflict: Television journalism during terror attacks‖ Sage (Los Angeles, London,
New Delhi and Singapore) Vol. 1(1)31-49.
Montville, J. V., Davidson, W. D. (1981) ―Foreign Policy According to Freud‖, Foreign Policy, Winter 1981-82, 145-157.(cited
pwks, conf.)
Mumtaz ,Khawar and Tahira Abdullah (2006) ― Monitoring Implementation of the SAARC Social Charter in Pakistan‖,
SACEPS Paper No. 12 (Submitted to South Asia Centre for Policy Studies (SACEPS) For Shirkhat Gah, Pakistan), September .
Muralidharan, Sukumar ― Media And Conflict: Introductory Note Part I- Media Fundamentals‖.
Naik, Niaz(2001), ―Confidence building in South Asia :problems and prospects‖, paper presented in International seminar on
South Asian Economic Cooperation, problems and prospects, organised by the Institute of policy Studies (IPS) , Colombo.
Nan, S.A.( 2003) ― Track I Diplomacy‖ in Burgess, G and Burgess, H. (eds.) Beyond Intractability.
Nangiana, Umer (2011) Discussion : ―No to bombs and violence,‖ The Express Tribune, Feb.4.
Nesadurai, Helen E.S. (2010) ―Labor and Grassroots Civic Interests In Regional Institutions‖, ADB Working Paper Series on
Regional Economic Integration No. 63, November.
Pargal, Sanjeev (2011) ―Consensus on dialogue; violence, militancy have failed: interlocutors‖ Daily Excelsior, July 13.
Patil, Sameer Suryakant., Aparajita Mazumdar and Kamala Kanta Dash (2008) ―SAARC towards Greater Connectivity,‖
Conference Report, Institute Of Peace And Conflict Studies, Konrad Adenauer Foundation & India International Centre.
Perera, Quintus (2008) ― CIMA partners SAARC Apex Bodies on Governance and Social Responsibility‖ Asian Tribune July,
29.
Philpott, Daniel and Brian Cox (2006) ―What faith based diplomacy can offer in Kashmir?‖in David R. Smock ed. Religious
Contributions to Peacemaking: When Religion Brings Peace, Not War, USIP Peaceworks No. 55: 5-8.
Pradhan, Kishor and Harsha Liyanage Document 39, IDRC.
―Private Professionals for Peace‖ in Introduction to People Building Peace Eurpoean platform for conflict prevention and
transformation.
Project summary of the project ‗SAARC Bands Festival‘ held from 30November - 2 December, 2007 in Delhi.
Pyakurelpp, Sushil (2010) ―National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in South Asia: Cooperation needed to challenge
regional impunity‖ Asian Human Rights Defender Main Feature :A regional human rights mechanism for South Asia 6( 1 ) 13-
15
Rahman, A Atiq (2002) ―Policy Livelihood Relationship in South Asia, Role of NGOs in Advocacy: Lessons Learnt from
Bangladesh and South Asian Countries‖, Bangladesh Centre For Advanced Studies.
Rai, Ajai K.(2003) ― Diplomacy and the News Media : A Comment on the Indian Experience‖ Strategic Analysis, 27( 1) Jan-
Mar.
-Rajasingam, Nirmala (2011) ― The simulated politics of diaspora‖ Himal January.
Report No. 36445-GLB (2006) ―Civil Society and Peacebuilding :Potential, Limitations and Critical Factors‖, Social
Development Department, Sustainable Development Network Document of the World Bank, Dec. 20.
RETA 6417 ―Supporting Network of Research Institutes and Think Tanks in South Asia: Phase II - Selection of the Next Set of
Research Proposals ,Supplementary Technical Assistance for TA 6189-REG‖.
R. Gupta et al., American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 3(1), June-August, 2013, pp. 50-
65
AIJRHASS 13-212; © 2013, AIJRHASS All Rights Reserved Page 65
Reychler, Luc ―Field Diplomacy Initiatives In Burundi And Cameroon‖.
Rosario, T..Cruz-del. (2008) ― Regionalism, Governance and the ADB :A Foucauldian Perspective,‖ Centre on Asia and
Globalization Working Paper Series. No. 3. Singapore Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore.
SACEPS Recommendations to The Sixteenth SAARC Summit, (Thimpu, April 2010).
Salik, Naeem (2006) ―Minimum Deterrence and India Pakistan Nuclear Dialogue :Case Study on Pakistan‖ , LNCV
Publications, March.
Santos, Soliman M. and JR. Esq. ― The Role of Civil Society in Peace Processes in the South and South East Asian Regions‖,
Background Paper 4d.
Sarwar, Beena (1997) ―Indo-Pakistan Cross Fertilisation,‖ Himal South Asian, June.
Schaffer, Howard B., and Teresita Schaffer (2005) ― Kashmir: Fifty Years of Running in Place‖, in Chester A. Crocker, Fen
Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall ed. Grasping the Nettle :Analyzing Cases of Intractable Conflict Washington, D.C:United
States Institute of Peace, pp. 295-318.
Schmitz, Hans Peter ―Transnational Human Rights Networks :Significance and Challenges‖, Syracuse University.
Sewak,
Manjri (2006) ―Indo-Pak conflict: 'Ripe' enough to resolve?‖ The Financial Express, September 07.
Shah, Aqil S. (1997) ― Non-Official Dialogue between India and Pakistan: Prospects and Problems‖ ACDIS Occasional Paper.
Sibal (2011) ―Connect universities, hospitals of South Asia‖ IANS l September 10.
Siver, Stanford (2005) ―A Process Oriented View of Conflict Resolution‖.
Siver, Stanford (2006) ―Process Work and the Facilitation of Conflict‖, Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for
the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a concentration in Psychology and specialization in the Psychology of Conflict, June
6.
Srinivasan, Anupama (2009) ―A Survey of Civil Society Peace Education Programmes in South Asia‖,Educational Policy
Research Series Volume I Number 2 August .
Strand, Arne, Hege Toje, Alf Morten Jerve, and Ingrid Samset.( 2003) ―Community Driven Development in Contexts of
Conflict‖ Bergen :Chr. Michelsen Institute.
―Sufism For Peace‖ (2006) in the three-day international Conference on 'Sufism Sufi Traditions, Poetry and Philosophy' held at
India International Centre, New Delhi, on March 18, 19, 20, 2006.
Suhrawardy, Nilofar Muslim Media News Service (MMNS)
.Terzis, G. (2000) ―Empathizing with the Enemy: How the Greek Media Coverage of the Earthquake in Turkey Moved the Two
Peoples Closer‖, paper presented at 3rd International Crossroads in Cultural Studies Conference, 21-25 June, Birmingham.
―The Cultural Dimension in Contemporary International Relations‖ livemint.com, the wall street journal , Aug. 15, 2011.
The Hindu (2011) ― SAARC revisits Visa Exemption Scheme‖ , February 9.
The Institute for Multi -Track Diplomacy (IMTD) (2010) ―Kartarpur Marg: A Peace Corridor for India and Pakistan‖ Peace -
Building through Collaboration Project Report June.
The News International (2010) ―Aman Ki Asha termed the noblest cause‖ Feb. 5.
Thomas, C William.(1999) ― Gurus and Guerrillas :Religious Fundamentalism and Dispute Resolution‖, International Corner
Spring.
Timsina, Netra Prasad (2010) ―South Asian People‘s Assembly or People‘s SAARC: Enhancing inter-people linkages towards
alternative regionalization‖, Asian Human rights Defender Vol.6 no.1,June.
Tuck, Richard.ed. (1999) The Rights of War and Peace :Political Thought and the International Order from Grotious to Kant
Oxford :Oxford University Press.
USIP (2011) Women & War Book Launch and Symposium May 5-6 , Washington.
Wagner, Christian. (2006) ― Religion, States and Conflict in South Asia,‖ in Muflesh R. Osmany and Saheen Afroze eds.,
Religion, Military and Security in South Asia, Dhaka: Academic Press and Publishers Library.
Waslekar, Sundeep (1995) ― Track-Two Diplomacy in South Asia‖, ACDIS Occasional Paper, International Center for Peace
Initiatives Bombay, India, October.
What does 'South Asian diaspora' mean? South Asian Concern 2010
WISCOMP Update (2005) Vol. 6 No. 2, December, Foundation for Universal Responsibility of HH The Dalai Lama.
Yhome, K and Tridivesh Singh Maini (2011) ― Keep the SAARC borders soft and irrelevant‖, Academy of the Punjab in North
America, tehalka.com May 4.