ii
University of Reading
Department of Applied Linguistics
School of Languages
and
European Studies
Part 1 Module Handbook:
LS1ELU ENGLISH LANGUAGE IN USE
2008/9
Contents
Page
Introduction iii
General Structure of Part 1 v
Timetable vii-ix
LS1ELU Module Description xi
Schedule of Lectures and Seminars xiv
The Assignments xvi
Language in the Individual - Lectures 1-57
Language in the Individual - Seminars 58-68
Language as a Social Phenomenon- Lectures 69-126
Language as a Social Phenomenon – Seminars 127-135
iii
Version/Date
September 2008
Disclaimer
This is an informal guide for the convenience of students and staff. Formal Ordinances and
Regulations are given in the University Calendar (http://www.reading.ac.uk/calendar/) and in the
Programme Specification; should there be, or appear to be, any conflict between statements in this
handbook and the full Ordinances, Regulations and Programme Specifications, the latter shall
prevail.
Although the information in this Handbook is accurate at the time of publication, aspects of the
programme and of School practice may be subject to modification and revision. Information
provided by the School in the course of the year should be regarded, where appropriate, as
superseding the information contained in the handbook.
Please keep this handbook in a safe place as you will need to refer to it throughout your programme.
iv
INTRODUCTION
Welcome …
… to the School of Languages & European Studies, and particularly to the Part 1 course.
This handbook contains some general information about the Part 1 modules in the Department of
Applied Linguistics. Most importantly, it contains everything you need for following one particular
module, LS1ELU English Language in Use.
You should bring this handbook with you to each and every lecture and seminar session for the
module – it contains essential material for your satisfactory attendance at the module.
For those of you registered for the BA in Applied English Language Studies and associated
programmes, the School of Languages and European Studies General Handbook contains all
essential information and documentation regarding your programme. Please read this through now,
and keep it for reference throughout the year.
The members of staff who are most concerned with Part 1 in the School are:
The Senior Tutor, Applied Linguistics: Dr. Jane Setter
Part 1 Coordinator, Applied Linguistics : Dr. Lisa Atalianis
Module Teaching Staff
LS1SG Sounds, Grammar & Meaning: Dr. Jane Setter (Autumn term)
Dr. Jacqueline Laws (Spring term)
LS1ELS English Language and Society: Dr. Dominka Baran (Autumn term)
Dr. Judith Baxter ( Spring term)
LS1ELU English Language in Use Dr. Lisa Atalianis (Autumn & Spring terms)
If you have any queries at any time, please contact any of these members of staff, or speak in the
first instance to the Secretary, Mrs Lesley Owen (see The School General Handbook for details of
their offices and email addresses).
Module textbooks: we advise you to buy the following book, which is essential for the module
described in this handbook. The price is approximate.
Cook, G. (2003) Applied Linguistics. OUP, £8.95
We also strongly recommend:
Bloomer, A., Griffiths, P. & Merrison, A. J. (2005) Introducing language in use: a
coursebook. Routledge, £16.99
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R. & Hyams, N. M. (2002). An introduction to language. Thomson
Learning (7th
edition). £21.95
Trask, R. L. (1999). Language: the basics. Routledge (3rd
edition). £10.99
Yule, G. (2005). The study of language. Cambridge (3rd
edition). £14.99
v
The main School website is at: http://www.reading.ac.uk/languages.
The website for the Department of Applied Linguistics can be found at
http://www.reading.ac.uk/internal/appling/
From here, click on the link 'For Current Students'. The Part 1 Blackboard site can be accessed by
clicking on the 'Blackboard' link on the left-hand side.
This contains information about the material covered in the Part 1modules and helpful suggestions
about academic writing. The site is always being updated, so you should consult it regularly.
v
GENERAL STRUCTURE OF PART 1
The following is a summary of the Programme Specification for Part 1 of the BA Applied English
Language Studies (BA AELS) by full time study:
Part 1 (three terms) Certificate Level Credits Level
Students are required to take 120 credits at Part 1, of which at least 40 must be made up from the compulsory
modules below. The remaining credits may be made up of any combination of 10- and 20-credit modules offered in
the university, subject to the requirement for Part 1 examination.
Compulsory modules
Autumn, Spring and Summer terms:
LS1SG Sounds, Grammar and Meaning 20 C
LS1ELS English Language in Society 20 C
Optional modules
Autumn, Spring and Summer terms:
LS1ELU English Language in Use 20 C
Additionally, for students who wish to follow FT2TVA TV Drama at Part 2, it will be necessary for them to
select the following two modules as prerequisites:
FT1TFC Introduction to TV Studies 20 C
FT1CPT Introduction to Critical Practice in Television 20 C
and for students who wish to follow EN2LCT Literary Criticism and Theory at Part 2, it will be necessary to
select the following as prerequisite, and have at least a C in A-level English Literature or Language and
Literature:
EN1LL Languages of Literature 20 C
The examination of these modules will take place in weeks 5-7 of the Summer term, save that assessed
coursework will be undertaken either during term time or in the Christmas and Easter vacation.
For students who are not registered for the BA AELS or related programmes, each of the three
modules LS1SG, LS1ELS, LS1ELU may taken as a subsidiary subject at Part 1, but please note that
you must be taking both LS1SG and LS1ELS to be able to take LS1ELU.
Your Remaining Part 1 Modules outside the Department
If you are registered for the BA AELS as a single subject degree, this will leave you with up to 80
credits to find which may be made up of any combination of 10- and 20-credit modules offered in the
University for the Part 1 examination.
For students following BA AELS with a Modern Foreign Language, 40 credits will be made up as
follows: In French Studies
either
FR101 Advanced French Language 20 C
or
FR102 Intermediate French Language 20 C
and one of the following:
FR103 Contemporary France: Politics and Literature 20 C
FR104 French Cinema 20 C
In German Studies
GM1ICI Icons of Modern Germany 20 C
For those with ‘A’ or ‘AS’ Level German:
GM1AGL Advanced German Language 20 C
For those with GCSE German:
LA1PG4 German Language Level 4 20 C
vi
In Italian Studies
For those with ‘A’ Level Italian
IT1001 Advanced Italian Language I 20 C
IT1002 Twentieth Century Italian Culture 20 C
For those without ‘A’ Level Italian
IT1003 Italian Language (Elementary) and Culture 40 C
If you are registered on the BA in English Language and Literature, 60 of your remaining credits
will be made up as follows:
EN1LL The Languages of Literature 20 C
EN1RS Revisioning Shakespeare 20 C
EN1WKT What Kind of Text is This? 20 C
You will receive more information on these modules from the Departments offering them.
Please note the additional modules listed on page v above, which serve as prerequisites for choices at
Part 2 of the BA AELS as a single subject degree. If you are in any doubt, please speak to your
personal tutor.
Our Approach Taken together, Part 1 modules in The Department of Applied Linguistics will seek to motivate the
study of language by raising a number of language-related issues, including those of human
communication, linguistic description and social organisation. The modules offer a wide range of
topics, including grammar, phonetics, language development, language pathology and
sociolinguistics, as well as the applied areas of English language studies.
Teaching Teaching is carried out by a series of lectures, which will cover the issues and materials as they are
presented in this Handbook. The Handbook is therefore an indispensable aid to your following the
module. Small-group seminars are used to expand on and follow up points of interest; the seminars
are largely centred on specific tasks, for which the materials are presented in this Handbook, and it
will be essential for you to bring the Handbook to the seminars.
Attendance Attendance is required in all lectures and seminar sessions. If you attend fewer than 75% of classes
without good cause, this may be taken into account in borderline pass/fail cases.
Have you got all the right handbooks? If you are registered on our BA degree programmes please ensure that you also receive:
• The School General Handbook
• The Module Handbook for LS1SG Sounds, Grammar & Meaning
• The Module Handbook for LS1ELS English Language & Society
vii
The Part 1 Timetable in the Department of
Applied Linguistics
This is set out in tabular form on the following pages.
Each entry contains the Module code, Room, and Teaching staff (initials – see below).
Key to Abbreviations:
DB: Dr. Dominka Baran (LS1ELS English Language & Society, Autumn term)
JB: Dr. Judith Baxter (LS1ELS English Language and Society, Spring term)
JL: Dr. Jackie Laws (LS1SG Sounds, Grammar & Meaning, Spring term)
JS: Dr. Jane Setter (LS1SG Sounds, Grammar & Meanin, Autumn term)
LA: Dr. Lisa Atalianis (LS1ELU English Language in Use, Autumn and Spring terms)
Autumn term, 2008
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
9 LS1SG
Large Lecture Theatre
Urban & Regional
Studies Building
10
11 Academic Writing:
week 1 only
Van Emden Lecture
Theatre, HumSS
Seminar (alternative)
LS1SG/LS1ELS *
12 Seminar LS1ELU
1
2 LS1ELS
Room 109, Palmer
Building
DB
3 LS1ELU
Room 109 Palmer
Building
LA
4 Seminar (alternative)
LS1SG/LS1ELS *
* Seminars for LS1SG/ELS (Thursday 11 or 4): You will be allocated to one of four parallel small
groups in either the morning or the afternoon. Seminar group details will be posed on Blackboard
during the first week of term.
Please note the plenary session on Academic Writing in the first week of the Autumn term.
viii
Spring term, 2009
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
9 LS1SG
Van Emden Lecture
Theatre, HumSS
JL
10
11 Seminar (alternative)
LS1SG/LS1ELS *
12 Seminar, LS1ELU
1
2 LS1ELS
Room 109, Palmer
Building
JB
3 LS1ELU
Room 2S21 Urban
and Regional
Studies Building
LA
4 Seminar (alternative)
LS1SG/LS1ELS *
ix
Summer term, 2009
The Summer term is divided into pre-exam, exam and post-exam periods.
The pre-exam period is weeks 1-4: revision lectures and seminars will be held as set out below.
The exam period is weeks 5-7: a separate timetable will be sent to you by the University
Examinations Office.
The post-exam period is weeks 8-10: a separate timetable of lectures, seminars and tutorial
appointments will be held as set out below.
NB attendance at all the summer term timetabled sessions is compulsory.
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
9 Grammar Sessions
Week 8, JL
LS1SG
Wks 1 & 2
Nike Lecture
Theatre,
Agriculture
JS/JL
Grammar Sessions,
Week 8, JL
10 Grammar Sessions
Week, JL
Grammar Sessions
Week 8, JL
11 Study Skills
Week 8,
Seminar
(alternative)
LS1SG/LS1ELS *
Wks 1-4
Study Skills
Week 8
12 Study Skills
Week 8
Seminar, LS1ELU
Wks 1-2
Study Skills
Week 8
1
2 LS1ELS
Wks 1 & 2
URS Large Lecture
Theatre, DB/JB
3 LS1ELU
Wks 1 & 2
Room 1L08,
Agriculture, LA
4 Seminar
(alternative)
LS1SG/LS1ELS *
Wks 1-4
x
Assessment
For LS1ELU, assessment is carried out in two forms, by coursework and by final examination.
Coursework assessment consists of two written assignments for this module.
Final examination consists of a written paper requiring answers to two essay questions, one from
each term’s content area.
We would like here to draw your attention to the details of the length, timing and weighting of these
assessments, and the penalties for late submission, in the Module Description in the next section.
Details of the assignments are set out in the next section.
Progression requirements
To proceed to Part 2, a student must (a) obtain an average of at least 40% in each of the compulsory
modules, LS1SG and LS1ELS, and (b) achieve an overall average of at least 40% in 120 credits
taken in the examination, with a mark of no less than 30% in any one module.
xi
LS1ELU
ENGLISH LANGUAGE IN USE
Module Description
We provide in this section the module description, and the schedule of teaching, relating just to the
Part 1 Module LS1ELU English Language in Use.
As you will see from the General Structure section (above), Part 1 modules LS1SG Sounds,
Grammar & Meaning and LS1ELS English Language and Society are compulsory for the BA
programme in Applied English Language Studies, and LS1ELU English Language in Use is an
optional module available to those taking both LS1SG and LS1ELS.
Each of these modules has a separate handbook which you will receive as you sign up for the
modules. These handbooks contain the detailed information relating to the lecture course, and the
associated back up seminars that is essential for you to be in the right places at the right times, to
follow these modules to your and our satisfaction. You must bring the right handbook with you
to each and every module lecture, and seminar.
Students proceeding to Part 2 of the BA programme in Applied English Language Studies and
related programmes will receive a separate handbook for that Part at the appropriate time.
xii
Module title: English Language in Use
Module code: LS1ELU Providing Department: SLES
Part/Level: Part 1/Certificate Number of credits: 20
Terms in which taught: Autumn, Spring, Summer Module convenor: Lisa Atalianis
Pre-requisites: Co-requisites: LS1SG, LS1ELS
Modules excluded: none Current from: 2007-2008
Aims:
This module aims to provide students with an understanding of how English-speaking individuals
acquire and use their language abilities, both in the context of the individual’s biological capacities
and in terms of the language user’s context individually, in larger social groups and across
communication types. It also aims to provide a general appreciation of the different modalities of
spoken and written human language.
Intended learning outcomes:
Assessable outcomes By the end of the module it is expected that the student will be able to:
• identify and explain the features that distinguish and relate individual and social aspects of
English language use
• locate and assemble information on individual and social aspects of English language behaviour
• appraise the evidence for theories of language performance and use across a variety of text and
context types
• organise their knowledge and articulate their arguments effectively in writing, in assessed
essays
Additional outcomes The module also aims to encourage the development of academic writing abilities and note-taking
skills and to reinforce what is learned in large lecture groups by facilitating students’ involvement
in small group seminars that support the main lectures. Students will also develop their
bibliographic and IT skills by use of indicated resources.
Outline content:
The content is organised around two main themes, the English language user as an individual, and
as a member of larger social groups. An appreciation of these aspects of language behaviour is
important for many applied areas of linguistic science such as child language acquisition,
psycholinguistics, language pathology, dialectology, sociolinguistics and language variation.
The study of language in the individual begins by looking at the characteristics of
communication systems, and introduces the proposed ‘design features’ for comparison of human
language with different types of animal communication. This leads to consideration of the design
features of the language user, taking in neurological, physiological and anatomical aspects.
Particular attention is given to documented evidence of sign language abilities in chimpanzees. We
then consider three phases of language behaviour in the individual: pre-school child language
development, giving detailed attention to grammar, vocabulary and sound system development;
real-time language processes in the adult language user, from hesitation phenomena and speech
xiii
errors to comprehension strategies and parsing; and finally how mature language abilities may be
compromised as a result of brain injury.
The complementary theme of language as a social phenomenon explores the ways in which
we use language as members of different social groups. We examine how spoken, written and
multi-modal interactions are governed by a range of codes and conventions that become formalised,
and sometimes ritualised in different private and public contexts. We also consider the skills that are
needed to communicate effectively in different social contexts such as public speaking,
interviewing and engaging with others. Touching on a range of theories to analyse stretches of
discourse (such as Conversation Analysis and Critical Discourse Analysis), we look at language in
such varying settings as: relationships, the family, the workplace, the media, play, teaching and
learning, and politics.
Brief description of teaching and learning methods:
Lectures with back-up seminar groups based on prepared practical work and reading and involving
structured group discussion.
Contact hours
Autumn Spring Summer
Lectures 10 10 2
Tutorials/seminars 4 4 2
Practicals n/a n/a n/a
Total hours 14 14 4
Number of essays or
assignments
1 1 n/a
Other (e.g. major
seminar paper)
n/a n/a n/a
Assessment:
Coursework
Two 1,500 word essays. Each essay will be set in the 7th
week of term, and must be submitted by
the last Wednesday of the term in which they are set.
Relative percentage of coursework: 33%
Penalties for late submission: 10% of the total marks available will be deducted where the piece of
work is submitted up to one calendar week after the original deadline (or any formally agreed
extension to the deadline). Once this period has elapsed, a mark of zero will be recorded.
Examinations: One 2-hour paper requiring answers to two essay questions, one from Section A (‘The English
language user as an individual’) and one from Section B (‘The English Language user as a member
of a social group’). The paper will be taken at the same time as the Part 1 examinations.
Requirements for a pass: A mark of 40% overall.
Reassessment arrangements: Re-examination in September. Coursework will be carried forward, if
it bears a mark of 40% or more overall. Otherwise it must be submitted by 1st September.
xiv
The schedule of lectures and seminars
Optional module LS1ELU English Language in Use 20 lectures, 8 practicals, 4 revision sessions = 32 sessions
Weeks Staff Lectures – Monday 3pm
Seminars -
Thursday 12 noon
Autumn
1 LA 1 The Origin of Language & the Human
Communication System
(Academic writing – Plenary lecture,
11am, Van Emden LT, HumSS)
2 LA 2 Animal Communication
3 LA 3 Child Language Acquisition –
Theoretical Accounts
“Chimp Talk”
Harborne Lecture Theatre, Plant
Sciences Building
4 LA 4 Child Language Acquisition – the
Development of the Sound System
5 LA 5 Child Language Acquisition –
Vocabulary Development
Child Phonology
6 LA 6 Child Language Acquisition –
Grammatical Development
7 LA 7 Adult Language: Planning &
Production
1st Assignment set
Speech Errors
8 LA 8 Language & the Brain: Language
Areas & Broca’s Aphasia
9 LA 9 Language & the Brain: ‘Atypical’ &
‘Typical’ Populations
Aphasic Speech
10 LA 10 Language & the Brain III
1st Assignment submitted,
Wednesday, Week 10
Spring Lectures – Monday 3pm
Seminars -
Thursday 12 noon
1 LA 11 Language & the Family: the
Development of Early Conversation
2 LA 12 Language and Education
3 LA 13 Language use in Bilingual Contexts Language and Education
4 LA 14 Language use in special minorities:
the case of the Deaf community in the
UK
5 LA 15 Language and the Media Language and the Media
6 LA 16 ‘Silent Children New Language’
7 LA 17 Language Play
2nd
Assignment set
Language Play
8 LA 18 Gender Differences in Conversation
9 LA 19 Language Planning Language Standardisation
10 LA 20 Language and the Workplace
2nd
Assignment submitted,
Wednesday, Week 10
xv
Summer
1 JS Revision (Individual) Revision (Individual)
2 LA Revision (Social Phenomenon) Revision (Social Phenomenon)
xvi
The Assignments
The two assignments which follow are formally ‘set’ in the 7th
week of the appropriate term; by this
we mean that at that stage you will have covered enough ground to make a start on them, and to
discuss them with your seminar tutors. This does not prevent you from preparing them earlier.
Assignments should be word-processed using the font Times New Roman 12 point, and double
line-spaced. Appropriate referencing conventions must be used.
Assignments should be submitted to Lesley Owen in HSS 178 by 5pm on the last Wednesday of the
term in which they are set. You should submit one copy of each assignment with two copies of the
coversheet (see below), and also submit the assignment digitally via the Digital Drop Box on the
Blackboard course for this module.
Assignment 1 (Language in the Individual):
Write 1500 words on ONE of the following topics:
1. Chimpanzees can use signs, but do they have language?
2. The period of the first 50 words is the first significant landmark in the child’s acquisition
of language.
3. Provide an account of Broca’s Aphasia. Detail how this syndrome was first identified
and detail its neurological and linguistic characteristics.
You should refer to at least THREE different sources (i.e. books or journal articles) in your
assignment. Wikipedia should not be used.
Length: 1500 words. Work more than 10% under or more than 10% over the stated word limit will
be penalised.
Assignment 2 (Language as a Social Phenomenon):
Write 1500 words on ONE of the following topics:
1. Taking as a source a TV programme, radio drama or book, investigate how female and
male speech is portrayed. Ensure you provide relevant excerpts of dialogue/monologue
to support your discussion (these extracts will not be included in the final word count).
What characterises the speech of each and what differentiates it?
2. Educational disadvantage may emerge from an inability to acquire/learn a ‘standard’
language. Discuss this in relation to a minority group discussed in lectures/seminars or
reported in the literature.
3. Select three newspaper or magazine articles targeting different audiences (e.g. The
Times, Guardian, The Sun). Comment on linguistic differences in their construction of
the same event/story. Include the articles with your essay submission.
You should refer to at least THREE different sources (i.e. books or journal articles) in your
assignment. Wikipedia should not be used.
Length: 1500 words. Work more than 10% under or more than 10% over the stated word limit will
be penalised.
xvii
Supposing you need an extension or statement
of Extenuating Circumstances?
Occasionally, domestic, health or other issues arise which make it reasonable for a student to
request an extension to the deadline for coursework or a statement of Extenuating Circumstances
for non-submission of work.
Such requests are only granted where there is good reason. This is for the benefit of both staff
and students.
Request for an extension for submission of coursework
Requests for an extension must:
1) be made prior to the deadline for a piece of work;
2) be submitted on an extension request form;
3) be accompanied by suitable documentation, typically a doctor’s certificate, or support
from your personal tutor in instances where there are strong reasons due to academic
work pressures.
Good reasons include illness or bereavement affecting a student or a student’s close family member,
or an unforeseen large number of assignments due on the same date owing to the demands of
departments outside our own.
Extensions are not granted for reasons such as lack of organisation, or because you did not allow
time to compete the work by the deadline, a computer is not available or its printer is broken.
Extenuating Circumstances
If you have already missed a deadline or been unable to attend an examination due to domestic or
health issues, or wish any other serious circumstances to be taken into account, you may fill in an
Extenuating Circumstances form.
Requests for consideration due to Extenuating Circumstances must:
1) be submitted on an Extenuating Circumstances Form; and
2) be accompanied by suitable documentation, typically a doctor’s certificate or support
from your personal tutor in instances where there are strong reasons due to academic
work pressures. Good reasons include illness or bereavement affecting a student or a student’s close family member.
Extenuating Circumstances do not include reasons such as lack of organisation, or because you did
not allow time to compete the work by the deadline, a computer is not available or its printer is
broken.
Reasons for the above policy include:
• Students do not like to feel, if they have submitted their work on time, that other students are
allowed to have extra time for trivial reasons.
• Students who submit work late are failing to keep to their deadlines, which is an important skill
in the undergraduate programme and also in life.
• Staff find it inconvenient to have extra assignments coming in after they have marked the ones
that were submitted on time.
xviii
Having said that, if you have a good reason for requesting an extension or wish to be considered as
having Extenuating Circumstances, you must contact your personal tutor to discuss the matter.
Your case will then be referred to the Senior Tutor, who is Dr Jane Setter. Her office is Room 177
in the Humanities and Social Sciences Building. Her email is [email protected]. You should
submit your extension request form or Extenuating Circumstances form to her, with
supporting documentation. You should try to do so as soon as you feel there might be a problem
with your meeting the deadline, and not leave it till the last minute, unless it is a case of emergency.
Both the extension request form and the Extenuating Circumstances form can be downloaded from
the Information for Current Students webpage, http://www.reading.ac.uk/internal/appling/info.htm .
Assignment Cover Sheets
On the following pages (un-numbered) you will find the assignment marking criteria, and two cover
sheets for each assignment. You should fill in each one and attach them both to each of your
assignments when you submit. Note that one of them has the space for your name blanked out – this
is to ensure anonymous marking.
Don’t submit any assignment without both cover sheets!
1
LSELU
ENGLISH LANGUAGE IN USE
AAuuttuummnn TTeerrmm
Language & the Individual
2
ELU: LANGUAGE & THE INDIVIDUAL
Lecture 1: The Origin of Language & the Human Communication System
Readings:
Fromkin, Rodman & Hyams, Chapter 2
Trask, Chapters 1 & 7
Yule, Chapters 1 & 13
Crystal encyclopaedia, Sections 45-46 and 49
For Hockett (1963), see Aitchison’s The Articulate Mammal (various editions), Chapter 2.
Concepts
Theories of language origin:
divine origin of language;
proto-language;
natural invention versus convention;
innate ability;
species specificity.
Proto-language/mono-genesis theory.
Multi-origin.
Hockett’s Design Features.
1.Aims of the lecture
i. Consideration of how language originated and theoretical propositions.
ii. Discussion of the evolution of linguistic ability in humans.
iii. Consideration of the ‘design features’ of the human language communication system.
3
2. Language Origin
• Early theories arose as a result of curiosity in man’s origins
• Origin of man variously dated – anthropologists/archeologists - man has existed for at least 1-5/6 million years.
500K years ago – late homo erectus (fire, tools)
250K years ago – early homo sapiens
70K-35K years ago – homo sapiens (Neanderthal) – underdeveloped vocal tract
35K-now – current homo sapiens – most likely to possess speech
written records are only 6,000 years old (Sumerians of 4,000 B.C.)
2.1 Theories of language origin
• divine origin of language
• proto-language
• natural invention versus convention
• innate ability
• species specificity
2.1.1 Divine Origin
• - Judeo-Christians - Adam named all things - Babylonians - language giver- god NabÛ - Egyptians - god Thoth
• Belief in divine origin of language is connected to the ‘magical’ properties man has given to language.
• Specific language use for religious and spiritual events/rituals.
• Language without thought? A divine gift?
4
2.1.2 Proto-language
• Primitive natural language: - Egyptian Pharaoh Psammetichus (664-610 B.C.) - James IV of Scotland (1473-1513) - Becanus (1518-1572)
- Webster
• Proto-language Mono-genetic theory Genesis ‘the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.’
Multi-origin
5
Multi-origin + extinction
2.1.3 Naturalists versus Conventionalists
• Plato’s ‘Cratylus’
• Naturalists versus conventionalists
• ‘Oral-gestural theory’ (Paget)
• ‘Motor theory of speech perception’
• Rhythmic grunts of men at work (Luria)
2.1.4 Innate Ability/Species specificity
Johann Herder (1769)
• innateness theory
• universality of language
• language is not invented nor given as a gift
Captive Children
• 1920s - 2 feral children - Amala & Kamala were found in India - reared with wolves 1970 - Genie – 18 months-14 years in isolation
• 2008 – children held captive in Austria
6
3 Hockett’s Design Features
• Interchangeability
• Feedback
• Specialisation
• Semanticity
• Arbitrariness
• Discreteness
• Displacement
• Productivity
• Duality of patterning
• Tradition
• Prevarication
• Learnability
• Reflexiveness
4.Language & Evolution Biological specialisation
5. The Communication Chain: neurological, physiological & anatomical structures
5.1 The Communication Chain 5.1.1 Encoding:
7
• Neurological encoding – the message is encoded in signals which are sent through the nervous system.
• These are translated into physiological signals, controlling the movement of muscles involved in the communication process (in hands/arms/vocal organs).
• Anatomical movement of the articulators.
5.1.2 Decoding:
• Anatomically – reception via ear/eye;
• Physiologically – translation of these signals into mechanical movements controlled by the muscles underlying these organs;
• Neurologically – movement are turned into nerve impulses which ultimately reach the brain.
6. Summary
• Many theories have been proposed concerning the origin of language – some more plausible than others.
• Language ability has been argued throughout time to be part of an innate cognitive faculty.
• Hockett has identified 13 characteristics which set human communication apart from other forms.
• Researchers have argued for an evolutionary biological basis for the development of neurological/anatomical & physiological mechanisms responsible for linguistic expression and understanding.
8
ELU: LANGUAGE & THE INDIVIDUAL
Lecture 2: Animal Communication
Readings:
Fromkin, Rodman & Hyams, Chapter 8
Trask, Chapter 8
Yule, Chapter 2
Bloomer et al Chapter 10
Crystal encyclopaedia, section 42
For more on chimps and sign language, see Aitchison’s The Articulate Mammal (various editions), Chapter 2. Concepts
Acquisition/innate/learned
Communication
Language
Speech
Types of sign: iconic/index/symbolic/mixed
Sign structure: graded/discrete
Various forms of animal communication
1.Aims of the Lecture i. To define‘communication’‘language’ and ‘speech’.
ii. To determine whether language is unique to humans.
iii. To consider the communication systems of other species.
9
2. Define:
Communication……………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………………..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Language……………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………………...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Speech…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
3. Non-vocal communication
• Body posture
• Colour
• Electricity
• Facial expressions
• Gesture
• Light
• Scent
4. Communicative structure
4.1 Signs i) signifier - word/scent/gesture etc. ii) signified - real-world object + conceptual content e.g. objects, emotions, concepts.
• Sign = meaning individual signs = token - ‘The elephant is the largest creature in the zoo’ (7:9)
• Semiotics - study of signs
10
• Signified part of sign = real world object or concept (REFERENT/EXTENSION) & evokes an INTENSION (conceptualisation)
4.2 Types of signs:
4.2.1 Iconic - sign resembles referent
----- -----/---- -----------
4.2.2 Index - signifier is directly associated with the referent in a mechanical or physical way
4.2.3 Symbolic -signifier and referent are connected arbitrarily
4.2.4 Mixed -mix of some or all of the above
4.3 Sign structure:
4.3.1 Graded signs
4.3.2 Discrete signs
5. Animal Communication
• Iconic/symptomatic/arbitrary/deliberate?
• Without learning or experience?
• Conscious and intended or stimulus-bound? ‘No matter how eloquently your dog may bark, it cannot tell you that its parents were poor but not honest’ Bertrand Russell.
• Communicative structure?
11
• Limited in communicative creativity?
• Similar to human communication?
5.1 Birds
• Parrot (Pepperberg 1987,1993) - claimed to have cognitive abilities similar to humans.
• Bird vocalisations: - call - brief outbursts/simple patterns of notes; - song - more complex lengthy patterning of pitched notes.
• Dialects - varieties of song
5.1.2 Birds & Humans
• Acquisition - innate / learned
• Innate - calls/simplistic songs; brain lateralisation
• Learned - complete song pattern; critical period
5.2 Bees
• Information conveyed by the bee dance: - distance; direction; quality.
• 3 dances: round; sickle (as shown below)
• tail-wagging
12
5.3 Dophins/whales
• Brain constitution
• Sonar detection sounds - help locate objects
• Other sounds and whistles - distress/mating calls
• Experiments - results suggest conditioned responses not a desire to communicate
• Evidence of stimulus-bound messages not creative communication
• Herman et al (1984;1993) – teaching dolphins spoken and sign languages to determine: a. if they could learn a human-created language b. discover more about cognitive (thinking/reasoning) abilities of dolphins
• Learned to carry out commands of 2/3/4/5 word sequences – e.g. ‘Window tail touch' - to be interpreted as 'Touch a window with your tail'. - basic sentence structure - Subject-Object-Verb variety.
• Dolphins correctly responded to ‘semantically reversible sentences’.
'pipe hoop fetch' (Take the hoop to the pipe) v 'hoop pipe fetch' (Take the pipe to the hoop).
• Could correctly respond to questions and imperatives
5.4 Non-human Primates
• Why investigate primate communication?
• Experimentation settings.
• Functions of non-human primate communication: - demarcate territory - socialise - warn group members of danger - attract & keep contact with mate
5.4.1 Monkeys
• Communication system - genetically determined + a consequence of exposure to a mature system
13
• Evidence of symptomatic + symbolic signals
• Example communication systems as used by the: - South Asian Bonnet Macaque – 25 basic patterns of communication – e.g. alarm calls/foraging/greeting - East African Vervet monkey – 3 distinct arbitrary calls in response to threat of eagle/snakes/large mammals - South American Goeldi’s monkey
5.4.2 Gibbons, Orangutans, Chimpanzees
• Gibbons - evidence of duetting
• Orangutans - male calls help to demarcate territorial borders; - those from different ranks approach or avoid the locus of the calls.
• Chimpanzees - evidence of a number of learned calls in response to specific referents.
5.4.3 Experiments on Non-Human Primate Linguistic Ability
• Earliest experiment - Viki (1948)
• Failure - chimpanzees are physiologically unsuited to speak: - neurological pathways between the brain & vocal folds are less developed than humans; - vocal folds are fatty; - epiglottis not well positioned for speech sounds; - larynx-tongue connection also imposes limitations on speech sound production.
• Signing and non-signing experimentation SIGNING Washoe - 1965-1972 (Gardner & Gardner 1966) & Nim Chimsky
NON-SIGNING
Lana - computer-controlled experimentation
Sarah - arbitrary symbols
• Do apes have linguistic ability?
support - broad definition of language - socialisation + communication
critics - ‘linguistic autonomy hypothesis’
are non-human primates creative signers? - Washoe - ‘water bird’ - Kanzi (Rumbaugh & Savage-Rumbaugh 1980-present) - signs that connect two actions
14
evidence of syntactic output?
6. Human Communication compared to Animals
6.1 What criteria can we use to determine if human communication is unique compared to animals?
Hockett’s Design Features:
Interchangeability
Feedback
Specialisation
Semanticity
Arbitrariness
Discreteness
Displacement
Productivity
Duality of patterning
Tradition
Prevarication
Learnability
Reflexiveness
6.1.1 COMPARISON BETWEEN PRIMATES & HUMANS
DESIGN FEATURE PRIMATES HUMANS
Interchangeability
Feedback
Specialisation
Semanticity
Arbitrariness
15
Discreteness
Displacement
Productivity
Duality of patterning
Tradition
Prevarication
Learnability
Reflexiveness
7. Summary
• Communication can be described with ref. to a sign = signifier + signified
• Tokens - iconic/symbolic/indexical
• Symptomatic + symbolic signs
• Innate versus learned behaviour
• Similarities in design features
• Pro-intelligence theorists v innatist
16
ELU: LANGUAGE & THE INDIVIDUAL
Lecture 3: Child Language Acquisition – Theoretical Accounts
Readings:
Fromkin, Rodman & Hyams, Chapter 8
Trask, Chapter 8
Yule, Chapter 14
Bloomer et al Chapter 10
Crystal encyclopaedia, section 42
O’Grady, W. (2005) How Children Learn Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Concepts
Imitation
Innateness Hypothesis
Language Acquisition Device
Motherese/parentese
Poverty of the stimulus
Recasts
Reinforcement
The ‘Interpretability Requirement’
1.Aim of the Lecture To consider theories of language acquisition including: - Imitation
- Teaching & reinforcement
- Innate capacity for language
17
2. Introduction
• Children do not have to be taught their first language but construct rules that allow them to use language creatively. “We are designed to walk…That we are taught to walk is impossible. And pretty much the same is true of language. Nobody is taught language. In fact you can’t prevent the child from learning it.” Noam Chomsky (1994)
• Theories of mechanisms underlying acquisition
- First proposals concerning the psychological mechanisms underlying the acquisition of language emerged in the 1950s
– founded in the behaviourist school – focussed on behaviour rather then mental systems.
3. Adam 2;8
1. Mother: Do you know what this is?
2. Adam: What this is # car.
3. M: No # that’s not a car.
4. A: Pin.
5. M: Pin?
6. A: Yeah # Mommy # pin.
7. M: What kind of pen?
8. A: Car.
9. M: Car?
10. A: Yeah.
11. M: What kind of car?
12. A: Red car.
13. M: Red car?
14. A: Yellow car
15. M: Yellow car?
18
16. M: What do you do with it?
17. A: [inaudible] watch.
18. A: Where horses go?
19. M: Where what go?
20. A: Where horses?
21: M: Horse?
22. A: Horse # go yes Mommy.
23. M: Did he go to the corral?
24. A: Did he?
25. A: There he is # Mommy.
26. A: Corral corral.
27. A: Baby horses.
28. A: Horses.
29. A: Baby horses …………….. (O’Grady 2005:166)
4 Imitation
• Probably involved in certain aspects of language acquisition e.g. naming, greetings, formulaic utterances; but not others e.g. development of morphosyntax (*felled over; *ringed, sentential constructions)
• 3 facts confirm that imitation does not completely explain acquisition: i. children are not good at imitating sentences containing unfamiliar words & structures ii. they rarely imitate iii. studies of children who have neurological/physiological disorders suggest they understand the language spoken to them + if they overcome the disorder they can immediately speak the language
5. Teaching & Reinforcement
• Few adults are aware of the complexities of language structure - unable to formally ‘teach’ the language
19
• Studies (e.g. Brown & Hanlon) demonstrate that parents pay little attention to HOW children say things but concentrate rather on ‘truth’ aspects.
• Children don’t react well to reinforcement when it occurs and are frequently unable to make corrections even when pointed out by adults
Examples
Child: Nobody don’t like me. Mother: No, say “nobody likes me” C: Nobody don’t like me [8 repetitions of this dialogue] M: No, now listen carefully; say “nobody likes me”. C: Oh! Nobody don’t likes me. (McNeill 1966:68)
Child: My teacher holded the baby rabbits and we patted them. Adult: Did you say your teacher held the baby rabbits? C: Yes. A: What did you say she did? C: She holded the baby rabbits and we patted them. A: Did you say she held them tightly? C: No, she holded them loosely. (Gleason, cited by Cazden 1972:92)
5. Learning by Example
c. …by example e.g. C: I runned really fastly Mummy A: You ran really quickly?
Recasts by Eve’s mother (Eve – aged between 18-27 months)
Eve: Eve’s mother:
It fall It FELL
I don’t read no books I know you’re not going to read ANY books
A butter You want SOME butter
Have two cracker How many CRACKERS?
Man up there THERE’S a man up there
Up wall ON THE WALL, yeah
Papa buy some Papa BOUGHT some for us (Moerk 1991)
20
• Recast rates for mothers of 2 year olds (Hirsch-Pasek et al 1984:86)
“bad” sentences “good” sentences
% of time repeated in whole or part 26.3 13.7
% of time not repeated 73.7 86.3
Saxton (1997)
4-5 yr olds – taught nonsense verbs, e.g. pold
METHOD: Initially child heard –ing form (present tns) and not past tns
Verbs constructed by researchers to be irregular
2 strategies used for teaching past tns: a. allow children to make mistake and then recast b. present correct form initially
RESULTS: strategy a – achieved a 30% success rate strategy b – 0%
CONCLUSION
Children are sensitive to recasts when provided as an immediate contrast to their own utterance
• II Longer term study
10 sessions over 5 weeks – by end of 5th week children had a success rate of 100% when exposed to recasts; compared to 40% when not.
CONCLUSION: recasts are helpful at certain pts in acquisition – e.g. Eve – most sensitive to recasts when using the correct form 50% of the time. Recasts do not help children learn but can reinforce forms (evidence – cultures found that do not recast)
6. Characteristics of ‘motherese’/’parentese’
6.1 Pronunciation
o Slow speech/sign with longer pauses between utts and after content words
o Higher pitch and greater pitch range
21
o Exaggerated stress and intonation/larger sign movements
o Fewer words/signs per utterance & minute
6.2 Vocabulary
o Limited
o Extensive paraphrasing
o Reference to events/objects in the present/current experiences
6.3 Sentences
o Shorter utterances (50% single words/signs or short statements)
o >carefully produced – well-formed and intelligible
o >commands and questions in spoken language data (approx. 60% of total)
o >repetitions (esp. in sign language)
6.4 Is it necessary for acquisition? – not necessarily e.g. Afro-American community in Trackton (Heath 1970s).
7. The ‘Interpretability Requirement’ (O’Grady 1997)
o Children must be exposed to language that they can understand without knowing a lot about the language they are exposed to.
o A large % of speech to children is about what they can see or hear/what they want to know about/what they have just experienced or will experience – therefore easily interpretable.
8. UG & the ‘Innateness Hypothesis’
o Language acquisition is a creative process
o Children from diverse social & cultural settings acquire language in similar stages – led some to postulate that children are genetically endowed with a blueprint for language – a Universal Grammar (UG).
o ‘Poverty of the stimulus’
22
o Evidence for genetic inheritance
8.1 The Acquisition Device
o The acquisition device is language specific devoted to acquisition. Consists of an inborn grammar (UG) i.e. grammatical categories & principles common to all languages (advocate of this view e.g. Chomsky).
Q: ‘That child is misbehaving’ – how does the child figure out that ‘child’ is a N and ‘misbehaving’ a V.
Answer...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
o The acquisition device is NOT just specialised for language (advocate, e.g. Bloom 2002) e.g. learning names of things is just an example of a general sort of reasoning Expt by Disendruck & Markson (cited in Bloom 2002) – illustrating reasoning.
WHICH THEORY IS RIGHT?
9. Learning strategies
o Regardless of the nature of the acquisition device there is still a lot to be learned – how do children do this?
o Generalisations – with in-built restrictions & control ‘Principle of contrast’ (O’Grady 2005)
Repeated exposure (with the help of recasts) needed for adult form to take shape in child’s speech.
10. Summary
o Children do not have to be taught their first language but construct rules that allow them to use language creatively.
o Various theories of mechanisms underlying acquisition have been proposed but to date researchers believe that children are genetically endowed with a blueprint for language – a Universal Grammar (UG).
23
o Although there is general agreement that there is a ‘language acquisition device’ there is still controversy surrounding the nature of it.
o Regardless of the nature of the acquisition device there are a number of learning strategies enacted by children in the acquisition of language.
24
ELU: LANGUAGE & THE INDIVIDUAL
Lecture 4: Child Language Acquisition – Development of the Sound System
Readings
Fromkin, Rodman & Hyams, Chapter 8
Trask, Chapter 8
Yule, Chapter 14
Bloomer et al Chapter 10
Crystal encyclopaedia, section 42
O’Grady, W. (2005) How Children Learn Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Concepts
Babbling
Canonical stage
Deletion
Minimal pairs
Reduplication
Reflexive sounds
Syllabic structure
Substitution
Variegated stage
25
1.Aim of the Lecture
To discuss:
• Early vocalisations
• Perception of speech
• Babbling
• Development of discernable speech sounds – vowels & consonants
• Adjusting to the adult model
2. Perception of speech sounds: prenatal & post-natal
2.1 Pre-natal recognition of consonants & vowels
• Speech is heard in the womb – salient characteristics – rhythm & intonation.
• Evidence: - infants turn heads to recognisable sounds; - suck more vigorously on pacifiers when listening to familiar voices; - story recitation before & after birth
2.2 Post-natal recognition of consonants & vowels
• Measures of sucking & heart rate
• Contrasting [b] & [p]
• Each sound played for several minutes – change of sound coincided with increased heart & sucking rates
• By 6 months – children hear the difference between vowel sounds
• Recognising sounds in a sequence: Minimal pairs
• The ‘fis’ phenomenon
3. Vocalisation to production
• 2-4 months: the “cooing” stage
26
• Develops alongside crying
• Child begins to respond to caregiver’s smiles and speech
• Quieter, lower in pitch and more musical than crying
• Often consonant + vowel (CV) syllabic structures– [ga] [gu]
• End of this stage – laughter begins to emerge
3.1 4-6 months
• 4-6 months: “vocal play”
• Much steadier and longer than cooing
• Sequences of CV syllables [ga ga ga]
• Seems to be a strong element of practice
• Parents often hear words which are not there … [ma ma ma]
3.2 ‘The Canonical Stage’
• Sounds become recognisably like the adult model.
• Consist of syllabic reduplications e.g. CV [bababa] or CVC [panpanpan]
• Similar structure of babbling – found in all languages studied – even deaf children babble with their hands!
• However from 6 months – infants from different language communities begin to babble distinctively (difference in intonation is marked).
• Babbling increases in frequency and complexity until the age of about 12 months.
• Babbling doesn’t seem to be crucial for the later development of real speech.
Common & uncommon sounds during the babbling phase – see slide in lecture. (O’Grady 2005:150)
27
3.3 ‘The Variegated Stage’
• Consonants and vowels change [badu]
• By 10 months the sounds have settled to a recognisable L1 range
• By 13-14 months children start to produce recognisable words – although these may be realised differently
• Early vowels & consonants
• 5 vowel sounds typically acquired early: [i:] “ee” [a:] “ah” [u:] “oo” [ u] (‘oh’) [u] “uh”
• Most common consonants in word-initial position are “b”, “d”, “m”, “n” and “h”.
• Consonants are acquired in a front-to-back order, (where 'front' and 'back' refer to the origin of the articulation of the sound).
Thus [t k f b ɡ ŋ j d s … before … l r ʃ tʃ dʒ v ʒ ð θ]
• Vowels seem to be acquired in a back-to-front order, with “or” (ball) and “e” (tell) preceding “ee” (meet) and “u” (mud).
• It appears that two variables dominate this process: visibility of articulators and ease of articulation
4.Child Articulations
What happens when a child can’t pronounce an adult target form/sound? - delete it/- substitute it
4.1 Deletion
dog > dah; cat > ca; foot > foo CVC CV
28
cat > ca CV consonants are favoured internationally.
4.1.1 Deletion: consonant clusters
• When a consonant at the beginning of the word is followed by ‘l’ or ‘r’ – drop the ‘l’ or ‘r’ e.g. .................
• When a nasal consonant (‘m’, ‘n’, ‘ng’) is followed by ‘p’, ‘t’ or ‘k’ at the end of the word, delete the nasal e.g. ....................
• When ‘s’ is followed by another consonant, drop the ‘s’ e.g. .....................
4.2 Substitution: 1. The stopping process
• The stopping process: replace a consonant that is produced with a continuous flow of air (e.g. ‘s’, ‘z’, ‘sh’) by one that stops air flow (e.g. ‘t’, ‘d’):..........
• The gliding process - replace ‘l’ or ‘r’ with ‘y’ or ‘w’......
• The denasalisation process - replace a nasal sound (‘n’, ‘m’, ng’) with a non-nasal sound (‘b’, ‘d’)
• The fronting process: replace a sound with one made towards the front of the mouth.
• Assimilation
• Reduplication (see lecture slide)
5.Brief overview
• Children tend to produce sounds at the beginnings of syllables first - and front consonants and back vowels first
• They avoid consonant clusters
• Unstressed syllables are dropped
• Consonants “harmonise” with each other
29
• [w] and [j] are used instead of [l]
• Fricative sounds are “stopped”
6. Summary
• When born children can recognise the speech of their parents and can discriminate amongst speakers.
• Age 2 – they recognise and are acquiring the sounds of their language.
• Difficulties in pronunciation are dealt with systematically by: substitution, deletion and reduplication.
30
ELU: LANGUAGE & THE INDIVIDUAL
Lecture 5: Child Language Acquisition –Development of Vocabulary
Readings
Fromkin, Rodman & Hyams, Chapter 8
Trask, Chapter 8
Yule, Chapter 14
Bloomer et al, Chapter 10
Crystal encyclopaedia, section 42
O’Grady, W. (2005) How Children Learn Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Concepts
Bootstrapping
Extension (over/under)
Holophrastic utterances
Semantic categories: Internal states;
Context-bound; Object/activity;
Recurrence/disappearance; Location;
Attributes; Social-Pragmatic
Type/token ratio
Vocabulary spurt
1.Aims of the lecture
• Focus – development of vocabulary
31
• 12 months – first teeth; eating solids; ready to walk; following adult gaze & pointing; first words.
• 15 months – average = 10 words 18-19 months – average = 50 words
• Typically first words learned = ‘mama’/’dada’/’papa’
2.What constitutes a word?
Children can be said to have learned their first word when:
(a) they are able to utter a recognizable speech form, and
(b) this is done in conjunction with some object or event in the environment.
2.1 First words
• Reported in children as young as 4 months – average = 10-12 months.
• Why? .....................................
2.2 The Vocabulary Spurt – see graph on lecture slide
2.3 Word learning from 18 months – 18 years (O’Grady 2005:8)
18 months 6 years 18 years
---|10 words per day__|_up to 20 words per day_______|------
50 words 14,000 words 60,000 words
2.4 Holophrastic utterances
• Nouns are usually first to be acquired
32
• Young child can express a variety of semantic functions and ideas through single words – or combinations of single words, e.g. ‘peach, Daddy, spoon’ (Bloom 1973) or ‘car go bus’ (Scollon, 1976)
• Low incidence of function words e.g. modal verbs; inflections
• Evidence that word order is acquired quite early – e.g. realisation of such utterances as ‘my ball’ not ‘ball my’
• Semantic categories: Internal states; Context-bound; Object/activity; Recurrence/disappearance; Location; Attributes; Social-Pragmatic
• Preference for nouns
Why?
Mothers use >nouns than any other lexical category;
Nouns mother’s use are easier for children to learn than the verbs used;
Children’s perceptual system is programmed to notice objects that satisfy the following 4 conditions: - Cohesion – objects which consist as whole entities e.g. a ball (versus ‘a head’ – this belongs to a larger object); - Continuity – objects that permanently exist in child’s field of vision; - Solidity – solid objects not permeable objects; - Contact – preferred objects (unless animate) that do not move.
3. Expression of Meaning
3.1 Over-extension, e.g. ......
• Appears for a limited amount of time – up to 2-2.5 years.
• Approx 30% of children’s utterances between 1-2.5 consist of over-extensions.
3.2 Under-extension, e.g.
- not realising ‘castle’, ‘office block’ is a building. >difficult to spot
33
3.3 Home language - innovate own vocabulary, e.g. ‘dunk’ – refer to coat
4. Word categories
• Words often come in semantic sets
E.g., a child will acquire bird, and then types of bird (robin, sparrow, blackbird, owl …)
The meaning of words will be reanalysed
• Nominals: Specific nominal (names, roles); General nominal (other nouns); Personal-social (emotional, interactional); Action
• Learning verbs…First verbs are those used in parental speech: 2 types: 1) denote activities: e.g. do, get, go
2) accomplishments: e.g. fell; found (it); broken Very young children associate the past tense of a verb with a completed act.
5.‘Bootstrapping’
• Making a guess about its meaning based on the syntactic frame = ‘syntactic bootstrapping’.
5.1 Prepositions
Location: Sit on the sofa
Origin: My husband’s from Cyprus
Direction: Let’s walk down the hill
Accompaniment: Come with me
Benefit: Could it pick it up for him
Instrument/means: Cut with the knife; carry by hand
Possession/belonging: House of mine
34
• Look back over Daniel & Sarah’s first words – what type of prepositions did they first use?
• Errors – of omission and commission Omission: e.g. Open it keys (open it WITH the keys) Mummy hit bag (Mummy was hit BY the bag) Commission: When a wrong preposition is used, e.g. Sam gave it FOR me (to)
6. Production & comprehension
• Children acquire words very quickly.
• Can understand more words than they can produce.
• Vocabulary includes comprehension and production.
• Comprehension spurt typically starts just after age 1.
• Production spurt typically starts a little later and is less quick.
6.1 Type/token measures
6.2 Specificity & range of descriptors
7. Summary
• Children are able to identify and produce words with increasing speed from 18 months.
• Nouns constitute majority of holophrastic utterances initially.
• Although patterns and strategies of acquisition are the similar across all children, the types of words acquired differ from child to child.
• Comprehension precedes production.
• Vocabulary development is a life-long process.
35
ELU: LANGUAGE & THE INDIVIDUAL
Lecture 6: Child Language Acquisition – Grammatical Development
Readings
Fromkin, Rodman & Hyams, chapter 8
Trask, chapter 8
Yule, chapter 14
Bloomer et al Ch 10
Crystal encyclopaedia, section 42
O’Grady, W. (2005) How Children Learn Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steinberg, D. & Sciarini, D. (2006) An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. Edinburgh: Pearson Longman.
Concepts
Mean Length of Utterance
Pivotal words
Processing bottleneck
Psychological Learning Principles
Telegraphic speech
Wh-questions
‘Wug’ test
1.Aims of the lecture
Focus:
36
Young children’s grammatical development:
2 phases: a) approx 18 months – 2-3 word utterances
b) aged approx. 24 months – rapid grammatical development – appearance of complex constructions.
2. Building Sentences
2.1 Pivotal words Child: Gregory (O’Grady 2005:86)
2.2 Analysis of 2-word utterances (SP 1999)
Agent + action e.g. _______________
Action + affected e.g. _______________
Agent + affected
e.g. _______________
Action + location e.g. _______________
Entity + location e.g. _______________
Possessor + possession e.g. _______________
Entity + attribute e.g. _______________
Nomination e.g. _______________
Recurrence e.g. _______________
37
Negation
e.g. _______________
Common two-word phrases involve “no” + item and “more” + item “No” perseveres as negation in the three-word stage Combination of negation + type of utterance
No + sit chair
2.3 Constructional ambiguity due to telegraphic nature of utterances
• Often a verb is missing
• Does “no daddy chair” mean: Daddy is not sitting in a chair OR Daddy mustn’t sit down OR That’s not daddy’s chair OR Something else ..?
• Context is therefore important
• Gesture also plays a part
3.MLU
• MLU = Mean length of utterance
Calculation = average number of meaningful elements (morphemes) in a child’s utterances. E.g. play cars= play + car + s (plural) = 3
Adam, Eve & Sarah’s MLU x age
4.Learning from ‘frames’
You can PUSH the car 1 2
I’ll GIVE the ball to Tim
1 2 3
38
5.Sentence construction
Subject + verb + direct object The boy hit the cat
• Children have little difficulty with this word order – 95% success rate (even in earliest utterances).
• Exception – verb-subject word order (without a direct object), e.g. broken the toy; fall down cup
• Telegraphic speech: Missing subjects & direct objects
Adam (%) Eve (%) Sarah (%)
Subjects 57 61 43
Objects 8 7 15
Processing bottleneck: I want want sweets sweets
6. Morpheme acquisition - why this order?
6.1 Brown (1973): - frequency of occurrence – x - increasing order of semantic or grammatical complexity
6.2 Steinberg (1982, 1993, 2001) – ‘psychological learning principles’: (1) Ease of observability of referent (2) Meaningfulness of referent (3) Distinctiveness of the sound signal that indicates the referent
6.3 When has acquisition taken place? Brown suggests must appear correctly in 90% of utterances.
39
6.4 Acquisition of morpheme ‘s
• Most plurals in English are regular
• Regular plurals are formed depending on the final consonant
• So if there is more than one “wug” it should end with ..?
• The Wug Test: % of correct responses on ‘wug’ test
Who, what, where, why, when?????
Order of acquisition:- where (approx 26 months); what (26 months); who (28 months); how (33 months); why (35 months); which/whose/when (after 36 months)
Function of wh-words
Subject wh-question Q: Who is playing outside A: Alice is playing outside
Direct object wh-question Q: Who is Alice playing with? A: Alice is playing with Chris
‘Someone is pushing the pig, and Pooh knows who. Can you ask him who? (Naoka Yoshinaga 1996)
‘The monkey is pushing someone, and Pooh knows who. Can you ask him?’
• Results of the experiment
7. Summary
• Young children’s grammatical development:
2 phases: a) approx 18 months – 2-3 word utterances b) aged approx. 24 months – rapid grammatical development – appearance of complex constructions.
40
• Utterances are constructed by combining words into frames and patterns – however some constructions are more difficult and take longer to acquire (e.g. wh-words).
• We can measure children’s grammatical development via MLU.
• Research has shown that children acquire English morphemes in a particular order – if over different time periods.
41
ELU: LANGUAGE & THE INDIVIDUAL
Lecture 7: Adult language: Planning and Production
Readings
Fromkin, Rodman & Hyams, chapter 8
Trask, chapter 8
Yule, chapter 14
Bloomer et al Ch 10
Crystal encyclopaedia, section 42
O’Grady, W. (2005) How Children Learn Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steinberg, D. & Sciarini, D. (2006) An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. Edinburgh: Pearson
Longman.
Concepts
Assemblage errors
Fluency cycles
Pauses
Tone group
Selection errors
Slips of the tongue
Spreading activation
Typical/atypical subjects
1. Aims of the lecture
Focus:
i. Language planning – formulating a message
ii. Language production – articulating the message
iii. Methods used to study this.
42
2. Indirect Naturalistic Evidence
2.1 Pauses in spontaneous speech – identify points at which pauses occur – may give
clues as to the planning of syntactic structure
2.2 Speech errors:
‘typical’ subjects – slips of the tongue (e.g. wee-freel – rather than free wheel)
‘atypical’ subjects – aphasic data e.g. ‘Name David’ rather than ‘My name is David’
2.2.3 Types of slips
• Wrong selection of item,
e.g. How are we getting to the chair? (Did you mean Church?)
• Something wrong with the selection process,
The indection was in his arm (‘injection’)
• Selection Errors:
i. Semantic errors (meaning errors)
e.g. ________________;
ii. Malapropisms (similar sound errors)
e.g. _______________;
iii. Both meaning + sound errors:
e.g. ________________
iv. Blends
e.g. ________________
2.2.4 Assemblage Errors: affect sounds, syllables & words
a) Transpositions - e.g. Sounds (‘spoonerisms’); Syllables;Words
b) Anticipations (sound anticipations = common assemblage error)
c) Repetitions (perseverations):
Common selection & assemblage errors – selection errors = semantic errors +
43
malapropisms; assemblage errors = transpositions + anticipations.
Linguistic units most effected = words + phonemes
i) single sound errors – anticipation; exchange, e.g. __________
ii) cluster errors – exchange, e.g. ___________
Words – exchange e.g. _____________; shift e.g. ____________
substitution e.g. _________; stranding ______________
blend e.g. _____________
Phrases/complex errors – blend e.g.___________________;
complex e.g. ________________
2.2.4 Speech errors tend to occur in predictable ways - Known as the lawful nature of speech errors, e.g., sound substitutions do not violate English phonology
2.2.5 What can we learn from these errors?
Decipher the units of planning – the size of linguistic material prepared in
advance of utterance; process of word selection; suggest how words & syntax are
planned & assembled.
3. Unit of Planning
3.1 Appears to be a ‘tone group’ = a phonemic clause (short utterance consisting of a single
intonation contour), e.g. What’s your name?;
I ate fish.
Evidence:
slips of the tongue occur within a single tone unit,
word selection – ‘tip of the tongue’ experiment and phenomena:
semantically – words of similar meaning are associated in our mental lexicon;
phonetically – seem to activate similar sounding words before narrowing down our
selection.
44
3.1.1 Mechanism of selection
• Begin with an idea of a word & then find the phonetic form.
• ‘Spreading activation’ – similar words would be activated – this would spread
from word to word e.g. trying to say ‘blue’ might activate all other colours + words
beginning with ‘bl’ ‘black’ ‘blame’ etc.
Speaker has to select word + suppress words not targetted – sometimes this goes wrong!
3.2 Planning & Assemblage
- Outline planning – choosing key words; syntactic frames; intonation pattern
- Detailed planning – fitting it all together
3.2.1 Outline planning: key words, syntax & intonation to tone group are
established
S
NP VP
V NP
run
[concept]
3.2.2 Detailed planning
S
NP VP
V NP
The boy ran home
45
4. Summary
• It is very difficult to access speaker’s brains to work out how language is produced.
• Indirect naturalistic data (pauses and speech errors) and experiments (e.g. TOT) provide a
window to the complexity of language planning and production.
• Observations and experiments have helped psycholinguistics to determine: the units of
planning (the size of linguistic material prepared in advance of speaking) and how
phonemes, words & syntax are planned & assembled.
46
ELU: LANGUAGE & THE INDIVIDUAL
Lecture 7: Language & the Brain I. Language Areas & Broca’s Aphasia
Readings
Fromkin, Rodman & Hyams, chapter 9
Trask, chapter 7
Yule, chapter 13
Bloomer et al, chapter 11
Crystal encyclopaedia, section 46
Obler, L. & Gjerlow, K. (2005) Language & the Brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Concepts
Brain hemispheres
Broca’s aphasia/agrammatism
Brodmann’s area
Cerebral dominance
Connectionism/Holistic school
Contra-lateral responsibility
Corpus callosum
Lobes of the brain: Frontal; Occipital; Parietal & Temporal.
Localisation
Nervous system: central/peripheral
Rolandic fissure
1.Aims of the Lecture
i. Explore the structure & function of the brain:
- the linguistic & neurolinguistic underpinnings of language skills;
ii. consider how language skills can systematically break down in individuals who have
47
experienced brain damage – APHASICS.
2. Neurolinguistics/Psycholinguistics
• The study of how language structures are instantiated in the brain:
- psycholinguists – study language processing in ‘normal’/typical individuals and
populations & neuropsychologists/linguists – study the breakdown of cognitive
(memory/attention) and linguistic abilities due to brain damage.
• As yet no single unified theory about language localisation/storage/processing – but
subtheories (e.g. sentence processing models) are available.
3. The Brain: Brain Hemispheres
3.1 Lobes
We can distinguish 4 lobes:
Frontal lobe (blue); Occipital lobe (pink); Parietal lobe (yellow); Temporal lobe (green)
The Rolandic fissure separates the frontal lobes from the parietal lobes (posterior lobes).
Although the cortex (grey matter) is most crucial for language, subcortical areas also
participate.
3.2 Cerebral dominance
• The phenomenon of one hemisphere being the controlling one is known as
DOMINANCE. This is CONGENITAL.
• Most people are right-dominant (left-hemisphere dominant) - >% men are left-
48
handed cf women.
• Only approx. 30% of left-handers are right-hemisphere dominant.
- Believed to be a factor contributing to language disorders and to various reading
and writing dysfunctions, such as stuttering and dyslexia.
Why? Two hemispheres are vying with each other for dominance.
• Sound preferences: Speech sounds are differentiated from other sounds e.g.
music; sounds of nature .
• True right-handers – believed speech is mainly processed in the left hemisphere –
while music etc is processed in the left hemisphere.
3.3 Cortical areas important for language
• The Brodmann’s area – lies at the back of the frontal lobe just in front of the
Rolandic fissure - responsible for generating movement.
This motor cortex exists in both hemispheres of the cerebral cortex and when
stimulating a cortical area in one hemisphere makes the muscles on the opposite
side of the body move – known as the ‘contralateral side’.
• Within the occipital lobe – the ‘somatosensory’ areas, e.g. the primary area for the
reception of visual stimuli (important for reading/sign languages/interpretation of
gestures).
• The temporal lobe contains Heschel’s gyrus – a structure particularly important
for the reception of auditory stimuli (environmental noise/music/language)
– behind Heschel’s gyrus is Wernicke’s area - necessary for interpreting auditory
speech.
• Broca’s area – involved in motor planning and syntactic processing specific to
speech production.
4. Lateralised brain functioning. Populations: insights into brain structure & function.
49
• Aphasic subjects – those experiencing language disorders due to brain damage.
• Alzheimer’s & demented patients – consideration of the ways language performance &
abilities interact with other cognitive abilities.
• Individuals with disturbances of reading (dyslexia) and writing (dysgraphia) or spelling –
the abstract components necessary for processing written language in normals and way visual
language systems are organised in the brain.
• Bilinguals and polyglots – how their various languages/dialects can break down and
recover after brain damage –how ‘modular’/independent the organisation is of similar materials
to be processed in the brain; how specific languages may be differently organised relative to each
other in the brain;
• Smaller populations – e.g. ‘split brain’ patients.
• Signers – those who use visual-gestural systems & polyglot savants (formerly known as
‘idiot savants’).
5. Approaches to Neurolinguistic Study
2 dominant schools of thought: Localisation & Connectionism (Holistic School)
5.1 Localisation
• the central parts of the outer surface more crucially linked to language;
• as different patterns of aphasia were observed, areas within the left-hemisphere cortical
language area were identified by localisationists – e.g. areas for the production and
comprehension of language (cf Broca’s & Wernicke’s areas).
• In recent years – cortical stimulation has permitted us to map areas of the hemisphere
responsible for language processing.E.g. PET scans (positron emission tomography) permits
observation of brain operation less invasively.
Different areas of activation can be seen for different language tasks. (Discuss next lecture)
5.2 Holistic School:
50
argue that localisation is a false compartmentalisation of linguistic abilities - these are
supported by large areas of the brain and these areas are interconnected. Focus – on
how the areas of the brain are interconnected + ways in which language is dependent
on cognitive abilities (memory, abstract thinking, attention etc).
6. Aphasia
6.1 Causes – closed (e.g. stroke/tumour) & open (wounds) head injuries.
6.2 Types
- GLOBAL – (damage to large areas of the brain) ltd productive capacity; poor
understanding
- BROCA’S - ‘non-fluent’ – speech is slow, deliberate and effortful; omission of
grammatical markers.
Comprehension is spared.
6.2.3 Broca’s Area
‘Classic Broca’s Aphasia’
‘Non-fluent’/agrammatic - speech is slow, deliberate and effortful, often with
omission of grammatical markers – tense; agreement; determiners etc. i.e. ‘closed
class/function words’ & affixes = telegraphic speech (dependence on nominal
lexical forms – uninflected N, V, A, P.
Difficulty controlling the articulators of speech: the tongue, lips, jaws, soft palate,
vocal cords etc.
Comprehension is spared.
The Cookie Theft Picture
L.M (Goodglass & Kaplan 1972)
‘The Cookie Theft Picture’
51
Kid…kk..can…candy…cookie…caandy…well don’t know but it’s writ…easy does
it…slam…early…fall…men…many no…girl. Dishes…soap…water…falling pah
that’s all…dish…that’s all.
cookies…can…candy…cookies cookies…he…down…That’s all. Girl…slipping
water…water…and it hurts…much to do…Her…clean up…Dishes…up there…I
think that’s doing it.
To be continued next week…..
52
ELU: LANGUAGE & THE INDIVIDUAL
Lecture 9: Language & the Brain II. ‘Atypical’ & ‘typical’ populations
Readings
Fromkin, Rodman & Hyams, Chapter 9
Trask, Chapter 7
Yule, Chapter 13
Bloomer et al, Chapter 11
Crystal encyclopaedia, section 46
Obler, L. & Gjerlow, K. (2005) Language & the Brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Concepts
Dichotic listening tests
Direct cortical mapping
EEG or rCBF investigations
Language specialisation
Neural pathways
Paragrammatism
Tachistoscopic presentation
Typical/atypical populations
The Wada test
Wernicke’s aphasia
1. Aim of the Lecture
1. Last week – examined brain structure + started to consider evidence from atypical,
aphasic subjects – Broca’s aphasics
2. Today – emphasis on one other type of aphasia: ‘Wernicke’s’ + other methods of
53
investigating brain structure & function in ‘normal’/’typical’ subjects.
2.Wernicke’s Aphasia
• Discovered by Carl Wernicke (1874) – German neuropsychiatrist.
• Patients presented with:
- difficulty in comprehending speech (misdiagnosed as deaf);
spoke fluently but made no sense to listeners (sounded like jargon)
• Presenting Disorder: Paragrammatism. Speech is fluent.
Affected elements of speech: organisation; selection of words and phrases
meaning; nouns (especially concrete); not affected = production
Sample Extract
P: They’re XX you know, boom? (makes hand gesture)
T: What’s this? (copies gesture)
P: You know the – these – under right there – er – end of the football
T: End of the football?
P: Yes. Is it – it it – influence of football right here – it /k k/ cause it to comes in, see?
T: Yeah
P: The end of it, see? Oh we a lot of XX see.
T: I don’t understand.
P: Well. It’s er. Well it’s XX XX XX XX see. You don’t understand it but it but it …
3.Comparison of Broca’s & Wernicke’s Aphasia - Neural pathways involved in processing
spoken language
3.1 Speech production:
->basic structure of utterance is produced in Wernicke’s area, sent to
-> Broca’s area for morphosyntactic/motor encoding,
-> motor programme passed on to motor area responsible for directing articulatory organs
54
3.2 Speech comprehension:
->Signals are sent from the ear to the auditory cortex; � these are transferred to the
Wernicke’s area for interpretation
4.Other techniques used to study brain organisation
4.1 Tests involving medical intervention:
o The Wada test
o Direct cortical mapping
o EEG or rCBF investigations
o Other tests:
o Tachistoscopic presentation
o Dichotic listening tests
4.1.1 The Wada Test
o Alternatively: “intracarotid sodium amobarbital procedure”
o Devised by Canadian neuropsychologist Juhn Wada
o Often used prior to surgery for epilepsy, in which the corpus callosum is
severed
o Disassociates one side of the brain from the other
o Results confirm statistics of incidence of aphasia after brain injury:
4.1.2 Direct Cortical Mapping (Penfield 1959). Involves electrical stimulation
of the brain.
Modern aphasiologists are still not entirely in agreement as to which
specific language functions are subserved by specific brain areas.
4.1.3 Electroencephalographic (EEG) or Regional Cerebral Blood-flow (rCBF)
investigations
4.1.4 Tachistoscopic presentation uses visual stimuli
4.1.5 Dichotic presentation - uses auditory stimuli.
55
- Signals from the ears are processed on opposite sides of the brain
- Then sent to the left hemisphere for linguistic recognition
5. Right Hemisphere Responsibility
o Non-linguistic environmental sounds
o Recognising visually-presented words
o Especially concrete nouns
o Matching objects to auditory or visual naming / description
o Spelling auditorily presented words
o Reading logographs (writing systems)
o Holistic
o Picture pattern
o Processing intonation patterns, tone of voice
o Making inferences and understanding jokes
6. Language Specialisation
o Brain specialises in early years (approx aged 5)– language predominantly in the
left hemisphere.
o Critical period of acquisition – extends to puberty – after that time language
learning is more difficult (cf acquisition v learning).
o Example of Genie – evidence that some language acquisition can take place after
puberty however not to adult target forms.
7. Summary
o Language production and comprehension data derived from typical and atypical
populations provides a window to the localisation and processing of language in
the brain.
o In most individuals major language centres are located in the left hemisphere
however there is increasing evidence that there is a complex network of
56
interconnections and individual difference.
57
ELU: LANGUAGE & THE INDIVIDUAL
Lecture 10: Language & the Brain II: DVD presentation & discussion
This lecture will illustrate and further extend our discussion of ‘language and the brain’. The DVD will illustrate many experimental procedures, tests and syndromes discussed in Lectures 8 & 9, in addition to providing accounts from brain surgeons and patients suffering from head trauma. It will also discuss issues alluded to at the beginning of course with reference to the ‘unique’ qualities of the human brain and linguistic system.
We will have an opportunity to discuss the accounts provided in the lecture and on ‘Discussion Board’.
Please take notes whilst watching the DVD here. Please use other paper if needed.
58
LS1ELU
ENGLISH LANGUAGE IN USE
AAuuttuummnn TTeerrmm
Language & the Individual
Seminars
59
LANGUAGE IN THE INDIVIDUAL
SEMINAR 1: “CHIMP TALK”
Seminar 1 is a video presentation to support the second lecture topic. You will watch the BBC Horizon programme Chimp Talk, broadcast on 21st June 1993, and are then invited to make your comments on the discussion board on Blackboard.
60
LANGUAGE IN THE INDIVIDUAL
SEMINAR 2
Child Language Acquisition: Phonology
This seminar will address the acquisition of English phonology. We will discuss four different
processes occurring in child speech.
1. Briefly review the phonetic alphabet with your tutor (see charts of the ‘International Phonetic
Alphabet’ Lecture 3 of LS1SG Sounds, Grammar & Meaning).
2. Here are some representative samples of a child’s early words and the adult targets at which
she is aiming. How would you characterise the way her pronunciations differ from the adult
versions?
Adult target Child’s version
(who) /hu�/ [hu�]
(cat) /kæt/ [ka]
(bib) /b b/ [b ]
(toy) /t� / [t� ]
(noise) /n� z/ [n� ]
(back) /bæk/ [ba]
(loo) /lu�/ [lu�]
61
3. Can you explain what is happening in these examples?
Adult target Child’s version
(ask) /ɑ�sk/ [ɑ�k]
(glue) /�lu�/ [�u�]
(plastic) /�plæst k/ [�pat k]
(strap) /stræp/ [tap]
4. Now look at the following data. What’s going on here?
Adult target Child’s version
(egg) /e�/ [�e�ə]
(pig) /p �/ [�p �ə]
(blue) /blu�/ [bə�lu�]
(button) /�b�tn�/ [�b�tə]
(apple) /�æpl �/ [�apo]
62
4. Here we return to some of the words we’ve already looked at. See if you can describe them in
terms of consonants and vowels; e.g., cat is CVC. What do you discover?
Adult target Structure
Child’s version Structure
1. (blue) /blu�/ ______________
[bə�lu�] ______________
2. (glue) /�lu�/ ______________
[�u�] ______________
3. (pig) /p �/ ______________
[�p �ə] ______________
4. (bib) /b b/ ______________
[b ] ______________
So far we have looked at consonant realisations only. In the following task, we look at the
syllable level.
5. Can we make any generalisations about the sounds this child is deleting?
Adult target Child’s version Age
(behind) /b �ha nd/ [ha nd] 2;5
(supposed) /sə�pəʊzd/ [poʊzd] 2;7
(tomato) /tə�mɑ�təʊ/ [�mɑ�toʊ] 2;8
(without) /w �ðaʊt/ [aʊt] 2;7
(difficult) /�d f kʊlt/ [�d fkʊlt] 3;4
Think about “baby” words for everyday objects, like items of clothing or food items. Do they display any of the features of the words we have seen above?
63
Exercises are taken or modified from:
Stilwell Peccei, J. (1999). Child Language. 2nd edition. Abingdon, Oxon and New York, NY: Routledge, Ch. 9.
64
LANGUAGE IN THE INDIVIDUAL
SEMINAR 3
Naturally-occurring Speech Errors in Adult Speech
1 Attempt to classify the following errors, in terms of the discussion provided in the lecture.
a they want to enlicit your support
b he had a load of cooken chicked
c he could at weast – at least get them here
d a clear pliece of evidence
e I got into this guy with a discussion
f what’s your bate of dirth?
g today, we’ll look at nasals, lides and gliquids
h she really likes lining it on the lay
i thirth and fourth
j you forgot to add the list to the butter
k who did you think else would come?
l automatic transmission (intended: orthographic transcription; speaker had been thinking about cars instead of the topic of discussion!)
m you have to do learn that
n how many of there are you?
o tell – ask me whether...
p it waits to pay
q you go wash – brush your hair this minute!
65
r it makes the warm breather to air
2 What sorts of units are involved here? What might we learn about language production processes from this sort of evidence?
Units/
Types
Subs
Antic Persev Exch Shift Strand Blend Comp
Single
sound
Cluster
Syllable
Word
Phrase
66
LANGUAGE IN THE INDIVIDUAL
SEMINAR 4
Language & the Brain – Aphasic Speech
TThhee ttaasskk The seminar is based on two aphasics’ attempts to describe this picture; one, referred to as H.W., produces a good deal of speech, while the other, B.L., manages much less. Apart from the quantitative difference, what can you say about the characteristics of the language abilities that these two aphasic speakers deploy?
Suggestions:
A Content analysis
Consider what you, as a normal speaker, would naturally include in response to the clinicians’ request to ‘Look at this picture, and tell me what you see’. Using a brief (no more than ten items) checklist of such ‘content units’, compare the two aphasic speakers’ attempts to convey the same information, both with each other, and with your own version.
B Grammatical organisation
What range of word classes and affixes can these two speakers deploy? What sorts of syntactic structures can they use?
C Communicative effectiveness
Given H.W.’s greater use of language forms, can you say why this sample, as represented on the page here, is not communicatively more effective?
67
The Cookie theft picture
(Assessing aphasia: the ‘Cookie theft’ picture. This comes as part of a well-known standardised aphasia test battery (The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination), but is also often used alone.)
Notes on transcription: as in the original published data, with assumptions about sentence units, capital letters, intonation, punctuation marks etc. preserved. Longer pauses indicated by dots ... .
68
Aphasic B.L.
B.L. Wife is dry dishes. Water down! Oh boy! Okay. Awright. Okay. ... Cookie is down ... fall, and girl, okay, girl ... boy ... um ...
Examiner What is the boy doing?
B.L. Cookie is ... um ... catch
Examiner Who is getting the cookies?
B.L. Girl, girl
Examiner Who is about to fall down?
B.L. Boy ... fall down!
Aphasic H.W.
H.W. First of all, this is falling down, just about, and is gonna fall down and they’re both getting something to eat ... but the trouble is this is gonna let go and they’re both gonna fall down ... but already then ... I can’t see well enough but I believe that either she or will have some food that’s not good for you and she’s to get some for her, too ... and that you get it and you shouldn’t get it there because they shouldn’t go up there and get it unless you tell them that they could have it. And so this is falling down and for sure there’s one they're going to have for food, and didn’t come out right, the uh, the stuff that’s uh, good for, it’s not good for you but it, but you love it, um mum mum [smacks lips] ... and that so they’ve ... see that, I can’t see whether it’s in there or not.
69
LSELU
ENGLISH LANGUAGE IN USE
SSpprriinngg TTeerrmm
Language as a Social Phenomenon
70
ELU: LANGUAGE AS A SOCIAL PHENOMENON
Lecture 11: Language & the Family: The Development of Early Conversation
Recommended Introductory Texts
**Holmes, J. 2001 Introduction to Sociolinguistics . 2nd Edition. London: Longman. *Spolsky, B. (1998) Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. *Trudgill, P. (2000) Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society. London: Penguin Books. ***Wardhaugh, R. (2005) An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. (4th Edition). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. * Very introductory; ** Introductory; ***More challenging
Readings (this lecture)
Anderson, E. (1990) Speaking with Style: The Sociolinguistic Skills of Children. London: Routledge.
Cook-Gumperz, J. & Kyratzis, A. (2005) Child Discourse in D. Schriffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (eds), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Garvey, C, & Beringer, G. (1981) Timing and turn-taking in children’s conversations. Discourse Processes, 4, 27-57.
Ten Have, Paul (1999):Doing Conversation Analysis. A Practical Guide, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Hoyle, S. & Adger, C. (eds) (1998) Language Practices of Older Children. New York: Oxford University Press.
McTear, M. (1985) Children’s Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Wootton, A. (1997) Language and the Development of Mind: A Study of Children’s Conversation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Concepts
Adjacency pairs
Communicative competence
Conversation analysis
Discourse content
71
Exchange structure
Joint text construction
Language socialisation
Pre-sequences
Proto-conversation
Repair
Turn-taking: - turn construction/turn allocation component
Turn transition
1.Aims of the Lecture
• Extend notion of ‘competence’ – grammatical + communicative
• Communicative competence: - term first coined by Dell Hymes (1966) - encompasses: i. grammatical knowledge (broad sense); ii. sociolinguistic knowledge (appropriacy); iii. discourse knowledge (e.g. coherence & cohesion).
2. Language Socialisation
• 1970s – interest in researching ‘communicative competence’ and contextually-situated learning.
• Ethnographic approach – focus on how language learners become participating members of a social group via learning of social and linguistic skills = LANGUAGE SOCIALISATION.
‘Children require both broad cultural knowledge but also an understanding of the social identities that define their position in their social world.’ (Cook-Gumperz & Kyratzis 2005:591)
3. Focus of Child Discourse Research
• The social & psychological impact of increasing linguistic competence over a child’s social environment;
72
• Sociolinguistic practices and events e.g. Play routines; games; teasing rituals;
• How children acquire sociocultural & linguistic knowledge;
• How children develop their social worlds through play & conversation as active agents.
4. The Family
• Family unit – development of early patterns of socialisation.
• How to set up a conversation e.g. structure/roles of interactants;
• How we influence interpersonal relationships – persuade; conceal intentions;
• How to behave in different contexts – mealtimes; ceremonial occasions.
5. Conversational Skills
• Conversation Analysis – Researchers: Sacks, Schegloff & Jefferson (US); Wootton, Drew, Heritage (UK)
• Conversation Analysis (CA) – involves study of talk in interaction
• What is conversation? What characterises a conversation? Prompts: - How is this different from a monologue? - How is this different from communication using other media?
6. Conversational structure
6.1Turn-taking
• Turn-construction component basic structure of the turn e.g. Lexical/phrasal/sentential
• Turn-allocation component – a. Current speaker selects next speaker; b. Next speaker self-selects; c. Current speaker continues.
• Adjacency pairs – some turns invite responses e.g. A: hello, how are you? B: I’m fine thanks
73
6.2 Special Features of Conversation
• Presequences – help to set up the conversation e.g. A: You know the game yesterday? B: Yeh A: well.....
• Repairs – remedial device to enable conversation to flow, e.g. Due to word-finding difficulties; clarification
• Discourse content – speakers relate their turns topically & use links within & between turns e.g. – use of anaphoric reference; connectives. - sequence events logically e.g. temporally; giving new information first
CUES FOR TURN TRANSITION
How do we know when it is appropriate for us to enter a conversation? What cues do we pick up on?
_1._____________________
_2.____________________
_3.____________________
_4.____________________
7. Early management of conversation
• Assymetric conversations – parent is skilled conversationalist; baby not yet developed language
• Fundamental parameter – INTENTION to communicate (first appears approx 9 months)
• Early interactions NOT considered conversations but appear like them e.g. Turn-taking with minimal overlap; one participant initiates, the other responds. = PROTO-CONVERSATIONS (Bateson 1975).
7.1 PROTO-CONVERSATION (3 months)
Baby: (smiles)
74
Mother: oh what a nice little smile yes, isn’t that nice? ...
Baby: (Burps)
Mother: oh what a nice little wind as well
yes that’s better isn’t it
...
Baby: (vocalises)
Mother: there’s a nice noise (Snow 1977:12, cited in McTear 1985:65)
7.2 One-word utterances (18 months)
Baby: (blowing noises)
Mother: that’s a bit rude
Baby: mouth
Mother: mouth, that’s right
Baby: face
Mother: face, yes, mouth is in your face what else have you got in your face?
Baby: face (closing eyes)
Mother: you’re making a face, aren’t you?
Basic exchange structure
7.3 Joint text construction
• Parents/care-givers develop dialogue/keep conversation going at later stages of development also.
• Initiating conversational device: summons-answer sequence.
• Established obligation for a third-part sequence.
• Adults remedy take-up of 3rd turn
75
8. Recap
• Elementary level : i. children learn to initiate & respond in conversation;
ii. Conversations consist of 2-pair parts (IR)
• More advanced level (approx 3 years): i. 3-part exchanges = beginnings of early dialogue e.g. Child: Will you play with me? Adult: In a moment Child: I need to get my aminals out from under the Christmas tree 3rd part takes account of adult response (turn 2)
9. Further development 9.1 Cohesion between utterances
• Exophoric reference – items/locations that exist in the context e.g. ‘red one’, ‘here’.
• Anaphoric reference – ‘it’ – links back to ‘the red one’
9.2 Repair
Approx 4; 6 years – precision timing in turn-taking (evidenced in conversational repair).
E.g. Self-initiated, other repair
9.3 Rules of conversational turn-taking: giving up the floor
10. Summary
Examined the development of conversation in young children: i. Rudiments of conversation occur very early in a child’s life – right from birth mothers often interpret early child movements/vocalisations as 1st pair parts/initiations; ii. Pre-school children take turns in an orderly fashion; iii. By school-age – they follow similar processes to adults in dyadic conversation; iv. Conversational repair – demonstrates – young children can monitor own & other’s conversations – can locate, diagnose & correct conversational breakdown.
76
ACTIVITY Lecture 11
Take a look at these extracts and decide if they constitute:
a. Self-initiated, self repairs b. Self-initiated, other repairs c. Other-initiated, self repairs d. Other-initiated, other repairs
1. A: My nom is Mary B: My nom? A: My nam...name is Mary
2. A: I want to go to the ... B: fair A: shops
3. S: what does twenty five makes then? H: pardon? S: what does twenty five makes then? H: twenty fives . makes? S: twenty fives makes? ............................................................... H: I think twenty fives is a hundred (McTear p.179)
77
ELU: LANGUAGE AS A SOCIAL PHENOMENON
Lecture 12: Language & Education
Readings:
Mesthrie, R., Swann, Deumert, A. & Leap, W. (2000) Introducing Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Philips, S. (2007) A Comparison of Indian and Anglo Communicative Behaviour in Classroom Interaction. In S. Kiesling & C. Bratt Paulston (eds) Intercultural Discourse and Communication. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Temple, Adger, C. (2005) Discourse in Educational Settings. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. Hamilton (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Concepts
AAVE/Ebonics
Additive/Subtractive bilingualism
Compensatory education
Educational sociolinguistics
Elaborated/restricted code
Interdependence hypothesis
IRE sequence
Register
1.Aims of the Lecture
• To introduce the field of ‘Educational Sociolinguistics’
• To discuss the effects of disparity between home/community language and classroom
78
2. Education & Schooling
• Education – teaching & learning activities providing access to knowledge & skills.
• Western society = CHILD SOCIALISATION; ADULT LEARNING. Tribal societies – training/observation/imitation.
3. Extracts
3.1 Extract 1: Leap 1993:219 (slightly adapted from Mesthrie et al 2000:356ff)
EXTRACT ONE
Teacher: What is 9 x 9?Frank: 90
Teacher: No, that is too big. We know that 9 x 9 is 81. What is 9 x 9?
Frank: 81
Teacher: 81. You know that 9 x 9 is 81. Can you get a 9 out of here? (Motions to the 90 on the board)
Frank: Yes
Teacher: OK, if we take 9 out of here, what do we have?
Frank: 81
Teacher: What about 83 divided by 9?
Frank: (Without hesitation) 10
Teacher: (With irritation) 10?
3.2 Extract 2: Dorr-Bremme 1984, as reported in Cazden 1988:16, (cited in Mesthrie et al 2000: 357)
Nancy: I went to Old Ironsides at the Ocean. [She explains that Old Ironsides is an a boat and that it’s old] We also spent our dollars and we went to another big shop. Teacher: Mm. ‘N what did you learn about Old Ironsides? Nancy: [Brief description of the furnishings and the guides’ costumes] I also went to a fancy restaurant. Teacher: Haha. Very good. Nancy: And I had a hamburger, french fries, lettuce and a _ Teacher: [interrupts] OK. All right what’s – Arthur has been waiting and then Paula, OK?
79
3.3 Extract 3: Solomon 1995:58-9, cited in Mesthrie et al 2000: 357-8
Teacher: OK now here’s the problem. This letter goes back to [the pen-pal] right? If you answer the questions here – like you put ‘No dog’ or ‘yes’, she won’t know the answer to this question because its not on this letter. You need to answer her letter. Do you understand? OK. So what we need to do is we need to change these into sentences so she’ll know the answers to these questions. {Several minutes later}
Teacher: [looking over Roberto’s letter] Good OK, and what do you put at the end of your sentence? ‘Do you have pets at home?’ And you wrote what?
Roberto: Yes a *
Teacher: Yes
Roberto: A monkey
Teacher: OK why don’t you explain that to her?
Roberto: I said, ‘Yes, a *’
Teacher: So what sentences are you going to write?
Roberto: ‘Yes I do.’
Teacher: ‘I do’ what?
Roberto: ‘I do have…’
Teacher: ‘Have…’ have what?
Roberto: ‘A dog’
Teacher: ….All right the important thing is that you understand that when you’re writing back to your pen pal you have to answer the questions in your letter, right.
4. Conclusions
• Classroom-based teaching & learning depends on LANGUAGE.
• Language is strictly regulated & managed: - teacher is dominant – turns at talk; assigning turns; determining length of apportionment of time & topics; - teacher’s idiolect is primary/dominant register
80
5. ‘The IRE Sequence’ (Mehan 1979)
Initiation – by teacher Response – by pupil Evaluation – of reply by teacher + request for further information or initiation of next IRE sequence
E.g. Extract 1:
6. Warm Springs Reservations 6.1 Cultural regulation of turn-taking: i. speaker address is general; ii. immediate response unnecessary; iii. Indian speakers control termination of turn (no interruptions)
6.2 Performance of Indian children (Philips 2007)
• Made little effort to gain conversational floor/did not compete for teacher attention;
• Did not demonstrate concentration on class discussion (e.g. no back-channels);
• Generally did not respond to teacher questions;
• Slow to learn rules for turn-taking & regulation of talk in classroom;
• Rarely talked out of turn (no interruptions);
• Never dominated classroom talk.
Adjustments
• Stopped ‘show & tell’;
• Worked 1:1
• Group project work involving only Indian children (Philips 2007:303)
7. Bernstein (1961)
• Elaborated code: rich vocabulary; complex grammatical constructions; elaborate semantic choices.
81
• Restricted code: repetitive & ltd vocabulary; incomplete syntactic constructions; ‘empty speech’ e.g. fillers.
• ‘Compensatory education’
8. Labov 1969, cited in Mesthrie et al (2000: 366)
American Vernacular English (AAVE) Permissable deletion of the copula in sentences: NP She ____ the first one started us off Predicate ADJ He ______fast in everything he do Locative You ______out the tape Negative But everybody ______ not black Participle He just feel like he _____ getting cripple up from arthritis
Sentences in AAVE in which deletion is not permitted: SAE Final position in a sentence: *He’s as nice as he says he’s
AAVE *He’s as nice as he says he ______ An unstressed following word: SAE: *Who’s it? AAVE: *Who __ it?
African American Vernacular English: The Debate
9. Immigrant communities
• Additive bilingualism (James Cummins) e.g. successful immersion programmes
• Subtractive bilingualism – loss of one variety
• Interdependence hypothesis – second language acquisition dependent on development of first language = crucial for educational success
10. Summary
• Contribution of linguists & the relationship between language and education.
• Classroom talk – specialised register + has a specific discourse structure.
82
• Pupils from different socio-cultural backgrounds employ different communicative & learning strategies.
• Bilingual settings – the importance of a strong linguistic foundation in L1.
• AAVE – sociolinguistic research can influence policy but can it bring about long-term change?
11. Post-class discussion/reading
• Who does have the right to choose the variety most suited to educate children from different sociocultural backgrounds?
www.cal.org/topics/dialects/aae/resources.html ‘Centre for Applied Linguistics’ Download papers about Ebonics controversy & visit webpage of John Rickford.
83
ELU: LANGUAGE AS A SOCIAL PHENOMENON
Lecture 13: Bilingualism
Readings/references
Baker, C. (1996) Foundations of Bilingual Education & Bilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Dorian, N. (1981) Language Death: The Life Cycle of a Scottish Gaelic Dialect. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Gal, S. (1979) Language Shift: Social Determinants of Linguistic Change in Bilingual Austria. New York: Academic Press.
Gardner-Chloros, P., McEntee-Atalianis, L.J., & Finnis, K. ‘Language Attitudes and Use in a Transplanted Setting: Greek Cypriots in London’. International Journal of Multilingualism. Vol. 2:1, 52-80.
Komondouros, M. & McEntee-Atalianis L.J. (2007) 'Shifting Patterns of Language Use in the Greek Orthodox Community of Istanbul.' Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development.
Concepts
Balanced bilingualism
Bilingual/ism
Death
Diglossia
Functionality
Maintenance
Proficiency (& measures)
Shift
84
1. QUICK QUIZ
• How many multilingual nations are there?
• How many languages are there in the world?
• What is/are the official language(s) of the UK?
• Define bilingualism? – Are you bilingual?
2. Define bilingualism? – Are you bilingual?
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
3. Bilingualism
• Societial bilingualism
• Individual bilingualism
3.1 Measures
Rate the competence of your own language(s) in each of the four macro skills: 1(weak) 2 3 4 5 (strong) Listening Reading Speaking Writing
Measures e.g. Mackey (1968)
Skills Phonological/Grammatical Lexical Semantic Stylistic Graphic A/B A/B A/B A/B A/B
Listening
85
Reading
Speaking
Writing Continuum of bilingualism:
>proficiency in A----------------balanced--------------->proficiency in B
3.2 Functional Bilingualism
• Who is the speaker?
• Who is the listener/s (target audience)?
• What is the context (e.g. educational/social/religious)
• What is the topic of conversation?
• What is the purpose of the conversation/speech event?
3.2 Decision tree (Baker 1996:13)
4. Concepts
• Diglossia
• Language shift
• Language maintenance
• Language death
4.1 Diglossia: Ferguson (1959)
Narrow definition: Diglossic communities: Arabic (Standard/Colloquial); Haitian (Standard French/Creole Haitian); Swiss German (Standard German/Swiss German)
86
5. Global Sociolinguistic Settings
• Individual bilingualism & diglossia e.g. Paraguay, Cyprus
• Diglossia without bilingualism, e.g. Switzerland
• Bilingualism without diglossia, e.g. bilingual immigrant communities
• Neither bilingualism nor diglossia, e.g. Rums of Istanbul
6. Language shift/maintenance/death
• Shift – changes in: population of speakers; domains of use; levels of proficiency.
• Death – final stages of language shift.
• Maintenance – number & distribution of speakers; domains of use & proficiency levels.
Some factors encouraging maintenance:
A. Political, social & demographic factors ............
B: Cultural factors ..................
C: Linguistic Factors ...........................
Some factors leading to loss:
A. Political, social & demographic factors
B: Cultural factors
C: Linguistic factors
Examples
Li Wei (1994, ongoing) –
3 generation shift: NE Chinese community
87
Paulston (1994) – Pittsburgh, USA 3-generation shift – Italians 4-generation shift – Greeks
Gardner-Chloros, McEntee-Atalianis, Finnis (2005) 4-generation shift – Greek-Cypriots (London)
Language Death: Oberwart (Gal 1979)
Hypothesis: – language choice dependent on: a) values associated with the language b) age c) sex d) social network – peasant/non-peasants
IMPLICATIONAL SCALE – choice of H or G by women
Language choice x age x social network
1. > peasants in one’s network, > likely to use H 2. older informants use >H 3. young people interacting with workers use >G 4. older people interacting with workers use >H compared to young people
5. Gender: Men i. steady increase in use of G across generations; ii. > increase if social network = non-peasant Women i. older generation – only peasant contacts;
88
ii. middle aged – pattern similarly to men; iii. younger generation - >German than men of same age – rejecting peasant life
7. Summary
• Definition of bilingualism
• Diglossia
• Language maintenance & shift
8. Post-class
Investigate another reported case of language shift. What factors appear to have determined the demise of the language involved? Discuss your findings on ‘Discussion Board’.
Possible studies – Dorian (1981) – Scots Gaelic Komondouros & McEntee-Atalianis (2007) – Greek-Orthodox Community in Istanbul
89
ELU: LANGUAGE AS A SOCIAL PHENOMENON
Lecture 14: The Deaf Community & Sign Language
Readings/References
Aldersson, R & McEntee-Atalianis, L.J. (2007) ‘A Lexical Comparison of Icelandic and Danish Sign Language. Birkbeck Studies in Applied Linguistics 2:41-67.
Kyle, J.G. & Woll, B. (1991) Sign Language: The study of deaf people and their language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ladd, P. (2004) Understanding Deaf Culture: In Search of Deafhood. Clevedon: Multilingual Matter.
Mesthrie, R., Swann, Deumert, A. & Leap, W. (2000) Introducing Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Sutton-Spence, R. & Woll, B. (1999) The Linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Concepts
Artificial sign systems
Deaf education
Deaf identity, culture & status
Finger-spelling
Manual features
Non-manual features
Sign contact
Sign language structure
Political correctness: socially acceptable/unacceptable signs
Spatial grammar
90
1.Aims of the Lecture
• To discuss the fundamental characteristics of sign language and the Deaf community.
• To discuss Sociolinguistic issues in relation to sign language, e.g. language contact & change; socially unacceptable signs.
2. Fundamentals
• Sign language = visual/gestural system; - used as the primary means of communication by the Deaf
• Only relatively recent study: - 1st study: Stokoe´s (1960) Sign Language Structure – (American Sign Language ASL)
• Common Myths Dispelled: Autonomous; naturally occurring; complex systems of communication i. internationally - not mutually intelligible – some universal characteristics; ii. nationally SL = mutually unintelligible from national spoken language; iii. acquisition – development follows similar stages to spoken language
3. Structure
3.1 Components of signs: 1. location of the sign in space; 2. handshape used to make the sign; 3. type of movement made by the hand; 4. the orientation of the palms of the hands.
TALK/MAKE (BSL - Kyle & Woll 1985:91)
91
Location: same - both in front of the chest Handshape: different – finger extended from closed fist vs closed fist Movement: same – right hand taps left Orientation: same – palm facing signer
3.2 Non-Manual Features - mark morphological & grammatical information e.g. eye brows/eyes – e.g. question-marking; cheeks – intensity; size; orientation & movement of head & body - mark grammatical person; lip movements – intensity; size; borrowing
3.3 Spatial Grammar
SLs – characterised by 3-dimensional grammar (spatial grammar) to encode grammatical relations between subject & object e.g. Nominal referent/pronouns – assigned positions in signing space e.g. I = touch chest, you = in front of chest, he/she = slightly to the right
Subject/Object encoding: ´The woman hit the man´ in BSL (Kyle & Woll 1985:141)
92
3.4 Finger-Spelling + Artificial Sign Systems
4. ´The Deaf Community´
5. Average age of SL acquisition
6. History of Deaf Education
18th Century – ´manualists´ (begun in Paris by l´Epee) - oral approach – (Germany - Heinicke) 19th Century - ´International Congress on the Education of the Deaf in Milan´ (1880)
1960s – illiteracy >30% among Deaf adults 2003 – UK – official recognition of BSL
7. Language Contact
• Loans from English
phonological – FINISH (adds English mouth pattern)
93
morphological – LONG-TIME (using English-derived structure)
• Calques (loan translations)
– name signs e.g. ICELAND; - English idioms or ´quotes´ e.g. DRINK PETROL;
- signs created from acronyms e.g. –b-b-c- (BBC)
8. Lexical Comparison: Icelandic & Danish SL Aldersson, R. & McEntee-Atalianis (2007,
2008)
9. Socially Unacceptable Signs (Sutton-Spence & Woll:241)
• Insults - e.g. x ORAL-SIGNER
• Expletives – i. create a continuum of expletives - mild>strong e.g. SHAME/DRAT - facial expression + speed of articulation + size of sign can make it stronger ii. * = xF____ YOU MY xF____ CAR BEEN STEAL (grammatically inflexible cf English)
• Euphemisms
- less visually explicit,
e.g. making movement smaller/facial expression ‘neutral’ or finger-spelling
94
e.g. xSEX > -s-e-x-; Xtoilet > -t-t-
10. Other Sociolinguistic Issues
• Gender variation – e.g. Dublin Ireland – different sign vocabularies; attendance at separate schools; gay signs
• Ethnicity – examples of variation e.g. Black & White Americans
11. Summary
• Sign language & Deaf communities - unique culture for sociolinguists to investigate universally.
• Subject to similar socio-linguistic influences as spoken languages: e.g. - power & solidarity - language standardisation & contact - variation according to socio-economic/demographic variables.
• Comparatively new field - rich source of data.
12. Post-class
Access: Aldersson, R & McEntee-Atalianis, L.J. (2007) ‘A Lexical Comparison of Icelandic and Danish Sign Language. Birkbeck Studies in Applied Linguistics 2:41-67. Discuss on discussion board.
http://bisal.bbk.ac.uk/
95
ELU: LANGUAGE AS A SOCIAL PHENOMENON
Lecture 15: Language and the Media
Readings/references
Fairclough, N. (1995) Media Discourse. London: Arnold.
Gauntlet, D. (2002) Media, Gender and Identity: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
Litoselliti, L. (2006) Gender and Language: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Hodder Arnold.
MacDonald, M. (2003) Exploring Media Discourse. London: Arnold.
Concepts
binary representation
cognitive dissonance
competition
centralization
globalization
‘info-tainment’
subject positions
synthetic personalisation
‘tabloidization’
1.Aims of Lecture
i. Introduction to media representations
ii. Focus today:
- ‘How are women and men represented in media texts and images (e.g. as passive or active, and in specific roles and domains)?
- What femininities and masculinities, and what gender relations, are constructed for women and men in the texts?
96
- Who is the ideal reader and what representations are available in the texts?
- What power relations, particularly unequal power relations, are created through certain inclusions/exclusions?’ (Litosseliti 2006:92)
2. Changes in Media Markets
• Consequence of: - competition; centralization; globalization; and tabloidization (Thompson, 1998)
• Media Representations: The media have signifying power, i.e., the power to represent things in particular ways largely (but not only) a matter of language use.
• The media are not simply representational, - sites for the discursive construction, and contestation, of knowledge, beliefs, values, social relations, and social identities.
• Media discourse works ideologically: the meanings produced serve a system of power relations, - representation involve decisions about what to include/exclude/ what to foreground/background.
• Media discourse assumes/creates subject positions for an ideal reader, viewer, or listener; actual readers, viewers, or listeners have to negotiate a relationship with the positions offered.
(Fairclough, 1989, 1995 – in Litosseliti 2006:92)
• Caution in the reading & analysis of media discourse
3. Active readers
• Engage positively with perspective
• Challenge/reject perspective – ‘COGNITIVE DISSONANCE’
97
4. An example: Changes to the representation of men and women in discourse but
continued concerns......
• Research has shown, (e.g. McCracken, 1993; Macdonald, 1995) predominant portrayal of: - women: physical attributes (beauty/sexuality) & gender role determined by relationships to others (supportive/passive roles e.g. as mother/wife); - men – physical attributes (strength/active); independent.
• Recent years – changing to depict > varied identities – e.g. encompassing homosexual identities/’the new man’
• Concern of language and gender theorists – in constructing ‘an ideal listener/reader’ certain subject positions are established as the ‘norm’ and therefore help to construct and reinforce a certain gender ideology impacting on public attitudes and behaviour.
4.1 Magazines
The world of the magazine is one in which men and women are eternally in opposition, always in struggle, but always in pursuit of each other. (Ballaster et al., 1996: 87 in Litoselliti op. cit.)
Targeting their audience: use of personal pronouns - such simulated solidarity – referred to as synthetic personalization (Fairclough, 1989: 62) / synthetic sisterhood (Talbot, 1995)
1) consumers continuously engaged in feminizing practices; 2) as universally heterosexual: - sexual role is multiply represented however – as passive/confident/manipulative, but women are featured as primarily being responsible for relationships. (Litosseliti 2006:100)
3) ‘New lad’
‘New lad’ – ‘reversion to traditional masculinity’ – < sensitive to feminism; express interest in sport/sex/male bonding
98
Discourse – construction/representation of the ‘new lad’ in opposition to other gender and social categories
4) New forms of sexism/hidden ‘agender’
Read the ‘Corby Press Advert’
Who is the ideal reader for each advert?
How are men and women ‘constructed’ in these adverts – what is/are their status/roles etc.
Are certain power relations assumed or established here?
How do you react to the representations of men and women in these adverts?
5. Summary
• Changes in media markets have led to changes in the discourse of the media (‘infotainment’; ‘conversationalisation’ etc).
• The media target an ideal reader/viewer/listener & audience is treated as a unified and uniform community.
• Personalisation is a key feature of women’s magazines and adverts.
• Focus in female magazines – feminising practices; sexuality; male magazines – male sexual drive; issues of interest to the ‘new lad/man’.
• Women and men are often portrayed in binary, stereotypical and superficial roles.
6. Post-class
Review adverts or articles in the magazines & newspapers that you usually read, or consider the adverts on TV. How are men and women represented?
99
Can you find alternative representations? If so what are these and how are they constructed?
100
ELU: LANGUAGE AS A SOCIAL PHENOMENON
Lecture 16: DVD & discussion (to be announced)
Please write notes here.................................................................................................................
101
ELU: LANGUAGE AS A SOCIAL PHENOMENON
Lecture 17: Language Play
Readings/references Beard, R. (ed) Rhymes, reading and writing. London: Hodder & Stroughton.
Britton, J. (1970) Language & Learning. London: Allen Press.
Cook, G. (2000) Language play, Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crystal, D. (1998) Language Play. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Opie, I & Opie, P. The Language of Lore and Schoolchildren. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Concepts
Alliteration
Ambigram
Enjambement
Graphology
Intertextuality
Metalinguistic awareness
Onomatapoeia
Parallelism
Puns: homophony; homography; homonymy; polysemy
Repetition
Riddles
Ritual
Rhymes
Spiels
102
1.Aims of Lecture/Focus
i. Why is language play important? ii. How is language manipulated by both children and adults for playful effect? iii. Why is it important for child language acquisition? iv. How & why advertisers and journalists use it in their work?
2. Time to play.............. Car number plates (Crystal 1998:6)
IOPER8 ---------------
4CAST ---------------
EIEIO ---------------
2THDR ---------------
YRUILL ---------------
IC2020 ---------------
ORTHDR --------------
_________
Riddles
Almost everyone sees me without noticing me, But what is beyond is reachable by all. What am I?
I come in darkness but fill the mind with light. I bring enlightenment to some, while gripping others with fear. What I will show you will often be unreachable. Journey with me and what I show you may haunt you or bring great pleasure. What am I?
3. Baby-hood
• ‘Baby-talk’/affective language
103
• Baby-talk characterised by: alterations in adult forms – often simplification; reduplication of phonetic/lexical/phrasal/sentential forms. e.g. choo choo; moo moo.
4. First Year
• 6 months of age – most children have heard several rhymes and have developed favourites.
• >90% of vocalisations in first 12 months are ‘fun’.
• Towards end of first year – new > complex vocal-tactile & visual-tactile games introduced.
5. Year Two
See examples in lecture
6. School-age
• Function of playground rhymes (Opie & Opie 1959)
• Regulate activities in a game, e.g. skipping/counting: I like coffee, I like tea, I like radio, I like TV Eeny meany, miney moe
• Demarcate a style of narrative
In a dark, dark wood, there was a dark, dark house,
And in that dark, dark house, there was a dark, dark room,
And in that dark, dark room, there was a dark, dark cupboard,
And in that dark, dark cupboard, there was a dark, dark shelf,
And in that dark, dark shelf, there was a dark, dark box,
And in that dark, dark box, there was a GHOST!!!
• Distancing device and unfriendly play A: What’s the time B: Hang your knickers on the line
104
• Humorous effect
7. What is the importance of language play in childhood?
• ‘Helps you to learn language’, supports development of: phonetic/phonology; morphosyntax; semantics; pragmatics.
• Contributes to the development of ‘metalinguistic awareness’.
• Contributes to literacy.
8. Dig, Dig, Digging
How does this text deviate from the norms of conventional language use?: - phonologically; lexically; grammatically; graphologically?
9. Puns
A word/phrase which exploits confusion between similar sounding/spelling words/phrases: - homophony e.g. ‘are you trying to be punny’ - homography – reading/Reading - homonymy – bear (animal); bear (carry) - polysemy – fell (down/stock-market/mountain)
10. Graphic Language Play
105
11. Inter-textuality
‘Heinekin refreshes the parts other beers can’t reach’ ‘Heinekin refreshes the pirates other beers can’t reach’ ‘Heinekin refreshes the poets other beers can’t reach’
12. Ritual and Language Use
• Formal patterning – of sound and structure - these involve – key words; repetitive constructions (words/phrases); grammatical parallelism; incantatory/singsong rhythm, rhyme and metre.
• Semantic patterning: - creation of imaginary and spiritual existence – representation of alternative worlds
• Pragmatic patterning: use of contest/humour/social positioning i.e. play and ritual involve ‘performance’; taking roles; taking sides; performing an act.
13. Summary
• Language play is at the heart of parent-child interaction & >90% of vocalisations in a child’s first year are ‘fun’.
• It is fundamental to language learning; development of ‘metalinguistic awareness’ and contributes to literacy.
• Language play extends into our adult lives – puns/riddles/newspaper headlines – it serves as an important source of entertainment & a income for some!
14. Post-class
I can be created by humans, but they cannot control me. I suck on wood, plastic and skin alike. I demand time and energy. What am I?
Ten apples hanging on a tree. Ten children passing by. Each took an apple and left nine on the tree. How could this be?
106
Add your own examples of language
107
ELU: LANGUAGE AS A SOCIAL PHENOMENON
Lecture 18: Gender differences in conversation
Readings/references
Coates, J. (2003) Men Talk. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Coates, J. (2004) Women, Men and Language. Edinburgh: Pearson Educational Publishing.
Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (2006) Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holmes, J. (1995) Women, men and politeness. London: Longman.
Holmes, J. (2006) Gendered Talk at Work. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Litoselliti, L. (2006) Gender and Language: Theory and Practice. London: Hodder Arnold.
Mills, S. (2003) Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swann, J. (1992) Girls, boys and language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Concepts
Commands
Definition of ‘sex’ & ‘gender’
Difference/dominance approaches
Directives
Hedges
Minimal responses
Politeness
Taboo words & swearing
Tag questions
Topic initiations
108
1.Aim of Lecture/Focus
i. Extend the discussion of the ‘difference’ approach (ELS) – extend consideration to other discourse features. ii. Discuss another perspective – the ‘dominance approach’.
2. Extracts
2.1 Extract 1: (Holmes 2006:85)
Speaker 1: Archive security’s ( ) isn’t it?
Speaker 2: I’m not sure.
Speaker 1: my gosh what do you mean you’re not sure?
Speaker 2: well Gar- Gary and Robert are the ones that are involved with sending off tapes and bringing them back so
Speaker 1: well if they weren’t here what would you do?
Speaker 2: I would most probably find their notes that don’t exist.
Speaker 1: okay that’s quite surprising you don’t know that + it’s quite a critical one don’t you think?
Speaker 2: yeah
2.2 Extract 2 (Holmes 2006:81)
Speaker 1: um I’m not sure ....just trying to think + I’ll have a wee think there’s probably some decent things to read about that actually [I’ll take a look for you]
Speaker 2: oh okay that would be useful [ thank you ]
Characteristic features of Extracts 1 & 2
Provocative; supportive; challenging; hedging; contestive; hesitant; colloquial (<formal); explicit
109
Widely cited features of feminine & masculine interaction (Holmes 2006:6)
Extract 1 Extract 2
3. Dominance approach
• e.g. Dale Spender (1980) ‘Man-made language’– disparity between male and female speech due to male dominance which subordinates women.
• ‘Man-made’
Think of similar ‘sex-marked’ generic expressions:
-
-
-
4. Difference Approach
• Difference approach – men & women speak differently due to different socialisation experiences.
• 1970’s Trudgill – casual v formal styles in conversation in speakers of Norwich.
• Tannen (1990)‘You Just Don’t Understand’ /Maltz & Borker (1998)
5. Discourse Features
1. Minimal responses & topic initiation ‘Research on the use of minimal responses is unanimous in showing that women use them more than men, and at appropriate moments […i.e. ] at points in conversation which indicate the listener’s support for the current speaker.’…(Coates 2004:87)
110
2. Hedges e.g. ‘I think, I’m sure, you know, sort of, perhaps’ Do hedges always express unassertiveness & uncertainty?
“The Labour Government are out, you know.”
“It was a really bad day, you know.”*
3. Tag questions
4. Commands & directives
5. Taboo words & swearing
6. Politeness
5.1 Hedges 5.1.1*Holmes (1987:64) ‘ Functions served by hedges’
‘You know’:
1. expresses speaker’s confidence/certainty
‘and so you’ve got to call him, you know’
2. expresses uncertainty (indicated by rising intonation)
‘I felt really exploited, you know’
Interpretation:
- Hedge is multifunctional.
- Hedge is a linguistic marker ‘Linguistic marker’ = linguistic item that is related to a social variable.
- Challenge Lakoff’s generalisation – women use hedges to express confidence.
5.1.2 ‘Like’: Irwin (2002:171)
4 girls in conversation whilst taking a break at their drama group:
111
Anna: Josephine used to come here and I was her like really good friends with her she was like my best friend
Cassie: if it’s one of those boys who kind of like you meet somewhere and you’re kind of going out with them and they’re like (.) they’re like twenty-one or something
5.1.3.Positioning of Speaker
Carolyn Houghton (1995, 123-124) Client: You know how that is when you just want to have a baby, just something that is yours and belongs to you…
Therapist: No Mirna, we don’t know what it is like. Please tell us, but don’t say “you”. It is your experience, not ours, so you need to say “I” instead of “you”. That is how “I” feel….
Client: Okay. I.
5.2 Tag Questions
- e.g. Dubois & Crouch (1975) 1-day conference. A) formal tag questions e.g. ‘Probably Industrial too, isn’t it?’ B) Informal tag questions e.g. ‘It’s glass, right’, ‘OK, lets move on’.
- 17 formal; 16 informal – all produced by men.
- In contrast Preisler (1986) - tag questions were used significantly > by women.
- Distribution of tag questions according to speaker’s gender + function of tag in discourse (based on Holmes 1984:54, in Coates 2004:91)
- Tag questions in unequal encounters (Cameron, McAlinden & O’Leary 1989:89)
112
5.3 Commands & Directives
- Girls used MITIGATED directives;
- In contrast boys used EXPLICIT commands. Goodwin (1980, 1990, 1998)
-
5.4 Taboo words & swearing
- e.g. Gomm (1981) recorded 14 conversations between young British speakers: 5 conversations – all female; 5 conversations – all male; 4 – mixed sex
- Coates (2004:98) suggests swearing is ‘an integral part of contemporary masculinity’.
- De Klerk (1997: 147) states ‘expletives…have become associated with power and masculinity in Western culture’ = taboo language assoc. with masculinity
5.5 Politeness
Brown and Levinson (’78, ’87) : 1. the need not to be imposed on – NEGATIVE FACE e.g. ‘I’m sorry to trouble you but do you mind if I just take that book from the shelf’ 2. the need to be liked and admired – POSITIVE FACE e.g. ‘your necklace is nice’
Meyan community, Mexico (Brown, 1998)
Tzeltal - strengthening or weakening adverbs: Strengtheners: “I sincerely/really/promise/demand” weakeners, e.g. “I perhaps/request/tentatively…”.
Brown tested 3 hypotheses: 1. women use more strengthening particles when speaking to women (i.e. pay a lot of attention to women’s positive face needs) 2. women use more weakening particles when speaking to men (i.e. pay a lot of attention to men’s negative face needs)
113
3. > particles are used in all female conversation.
Holmes (1995), Mills (2004)
Holmes - confirms Brown’s - male and female politeness forms in New Zealand.
… women are ‘more orientated to affective, interpersonal meanings than men’ p.193
Sara Mills ‘Gender & Politeness’ (2004) - challenges research which suggests that women are necessarily more polite than men.
6.Conclusions
Do men and women speak differently?
Do men dominate in conversation?
Are we asking the right questions?
7. Post-class
- Spend some time listening to friends/family in single and mixed sex conversations. See if you notice any differences in particular discourse features, e.g. - who initiates topics; - who provides more minimal responses? etc
- To what extent do you think this is a consequence of their gender and to what extent does it depend on other variables e.g. context; subject matter; power relation between interlocutors etc.
114
ELU: LANGUAGE AS A SOCIAL PHENOMENON
Lecture 19: Language Planning
Readings/references
Ager, D. (1996) Language Policy in Britain and Franec: the processes of policy. London: Cassell.
Barbour, S & Carmichael, C. (eds.) Language and nationalism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mesthrie, R et al (2000) Introducing Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Spolsky, B. (2004) Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wardhaugh, R. (2002) An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Concepts
Cost-benefit analysis
Language planning
Language policy
Linguistic assimilation/pluralism/vernacularisation
Process of language planning: selection/codification/implementation/elaboration
Rational choice model
Social engineering
Standardisation – levels of
Types of planning: corpus; status; prestige; acquisition
1.Aims of Lecture:
Introduction to:
115
i. types and process of language planning;
ii. concept of language policy;
iii. language standardisation;
iv. the rational choice model;
v. ideologies influencing planning;
vi. an account of one case study – Norway.
2. What do these have in common?
‘You just said ‘Can I have a ticket...’ instead of ‘May I have’ – that’s very American’
‘There are falling standards in the use of English by youths today’
‘You should refer to ‘herstory’ not just ‘history’’
2003 – BSL officially another language in the UK
3. Language Planning
• Term attributed to Haugen (1987) ‘..is a Government authorised, longterm, sustained, and conscious effort to alter a language’s function in a society for the purpose of solving communication problems. ‘ Weinstein (1980:56 - cited in Wardhaugh:347) or is it????
4. Language Policy
• Not synonymous with language planning.
• Refers to linguistic, social and political goals underpinning the language planning process.
• +/- of language planning
116
+ -
5. Modern nation building
Increase in European languages: AD 950 - 6 national languages (Anglo-Saxon, Arabic, Church Slavonic, Greek, Hebrew, Latin) 1250 - 17 national languages 1800s - 30 1937 - 53 2001 - ?>
(Deutsch 1968 cited in Wardhaugh:347)
6. Types of Planning
• Corpus planning – focuses on the internal structure of the language e.g. Spelling reforms; devising a writing system for a spoken language; writing grammar books.
• Status planning – efforts to change the use and function of a language (or variety) within a given society. E.g. Introduction of BSL as an official language in UK; introduction of Hebrew in 19th C
7. Levels of Standardisation (Cobarrubias 1983:43-4)
• Unstandardised oral language: no writing system e.g. Gallah (Ethiopia).
• Partly standardised: predominantly in the domain of primary education; unstandardised writing system e.g. American Indian languages.
• Young standard language: prevalent in administration & education up to & including secondary level but not considered sophisticated enough for tertiary level & beyond, e.g. Xhosa (S.Africa); Basque (France/Spain).
117
• Archaic standard language: not applied to modern concerns e.g. classical Greek/Hebrew, Latin.
• Mature modern standard language: apparent in most functions e.g. German, Finnish, Swedish, English ….
8. Function of language
Function
9. Types of Planning (cont’d)
• Prestige planning: creating a favourable psychological framework for the language/variety.
• Acquisition planning – efforts to encourage people to learn a language e.g. Work of cultural institutions such - British Council; Goethe Institute
10. Process of Language Planning (Haugen 1966, 1987, in Mesthrie et al 388)
SELECTION
CODIFICATION (graphisation; grammaticisation; lexicalisation)
IMPLEMENTATION
118
ELABORATION
(May not be in sequence)
Elaboration: Strategies for the Lexical Modernisation of Hausa
1. Borrowing from: English -- > Government > gwamnati Arabic � alqali (to judge) > alkaalii
2. Extension of meaning of a native term: ambassador -> jakaadaa (important palace messenger)
(McIntyre 1991, in Mesthrie et al:393)
3. Creation of new terms (neologisms): helicopter -> jirgin sma mai saukar ungulu (literally: vehicle-of above with landing-of vulture)
United Nations -> Majalisar Dikin Duuniyaa (literally: council-of sewing (up)-of world)
11. What type of language planning does this refer to?
‘Posters with the (Hebrew) injunction ‘Hebrew [person] speak Hebrew appeared in Palestine in the early part of the twentieth century, long before the establishment of the state. The Academy of Hebrew Language publishes and distributes lists of approved terms for various specialised fields. For many years the Israeli radio broadcast a one-minute skit, twice daily, in which one speaker criticised another for using a given expression ...and then provided ..an alternative’ (Cooper 1989: 63 in Mesthrie et al:392)
119
12. Rational Choice Model
1. ID of problem via research - e.g. sociolinguistic surveys or census details (determining no. of speakers; extent of biling.; overall lang.choice + attitudes in a specific society)
2. Development of language policy (goals specified) 3. Decision-making stage - possible solutions; cost-benefit analysis & selection of one alternative 4. Implementation of solution decided in (3) 5. Evaluation of (3) - comparison of predicted + actual outcome
Cost-benefit analysis
Cost Output Consequences
13. Ideologies influencing planning
13.1 LINGUISTIC ASSIMILATION - every community member should have command of the dominant language. Consequences - cultural, ethnic, social assimilation - leading to economic saving & national progress. E.g. ?
13.2 LINGUISTIC PLURALISM- encouragement + conditions permitting maintenance of different languages & rights of different language groups e.g. ? 13.3 VERNACULARISATION - restoration of an indigenous variety as an official language/main language for communication e.g. ?
13.4 INTERNATIONALISATION - selection of a non-indigenous variety as a language of broader communication - as an official language or language of education e.g. ?
14. An example: Norway
• Official languages - Aasen – Landsmal (Language of the country) > Nynorsk (New Norwegian)
Knudsen – Dansk-Norsk (Dano-Norwegian)/Riksmal (Language of the State) > Bokmal (Book language) 1885 – both languages recognised
• Amalgamation of 2 varieties (1917-81) > Samnorsk ‘United Norwegian’ - failed
‘She takes the book out herself’
120
Bokmal Hun/ho tar fram/frem boka/boken selv/sjol Nynorsk Ho tek/tar fram boka/boki sjolv She takes out book-the herself
Bokmal Hun tar frem boken selv Nynorsk Ho tek frem boki sjolv
15. Summary
• Language planning and language policy are crucial to modern nation states.
• There are different types of planning (corpus/status/prestige/acquisition) and forms of standard languages.
• The process of language planning involves: selection + codification + implementation + elaboration.
• There nature of language planning means it is not just a linguistic enterprise but also of concern to historians, politicians and social scientists.
16. Post-class
Consult:
Lord Dearing ‘The Language Review’
http://www.dfes.gov.uk/consultations/conResults.cfm?consultationId=1452
and
The British Academy’s response to the Lord Dearing report:
http://www.britac.ac.uk/reports/dearing-2006/response-02-07.html and discuss on Discussion Board.
121
ELU: LANGUAGE AS A SOCIAL PHENOMENON
Lecture 20: Language & the Workplace
Readings/references
Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (1992) Talk at Work Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Holmes, J. (2006) Gendered Talk at Work. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Koester, A. (2006) Investigating Workplace Discourse. London: Routledge.
Concepts
Adjacency pairs
Conversation Analysis
Cultural allusions
Goal orientation
Idioms
Inferential frameworks
Markers of solidarity/subjective stance
Modals: Deontic/epistemic
Procedural discourse
Relational talk
Transactional talk
1.Aims of Lecture
i. To discuss naturally occurring conversation in the workplace; ii. to consider its structure and function; iii. Focus on transactional and relational talk.
2. What is workplace discourse?
How does it differ to everyday conversation?
122
1.
2.
3.
4.
WHY?
3. Extracts
3.1 Excerpt 1 (Koester2006:1ff)
Dave: [...] Basically I’ve used their o:ld price list,
Val: Right,
Dave: And...I’ve made a few changes.
Val: Yeah,
Dave: An then there’s the cover.
Val: Right
.....
3.2 Excerpt 2
Chris: Um I’m – I’m going white water rafting next – next weekend.
Joe: Really!
Chris: [So hopefully if I don’t die, I’ll be back...the Monday after that
Joe: [hahaha] .........
3.3 Excerpt 3
123
Carol: Be nice if there was some place where you could print it out and the date would show up every time....But anyway....
Beth: Oh it’s right here Carol. Revised, Seven, one, ninety-seven.
Carol: Oh ....
Carol: Right Okay...Boy it’s tiny up there,
Beth: I know, hehehe. You need a magnifying glass [chuckles]
4. Transactional & relational talk
• Transactional = discourse focussed on work-related tasks.
• Relational = focus on establishing and maintaining professional/social relationships. (‘Phatic communion’ Malinowski 1923)
5. Characteristics of Institutional Discourse (Drew & Heritage 1992:22)
• Goal orientation: ‘an orientation by at least one of the participants to some core goal, task or identity...conventionally associated with the institution.’
• ‘Special and particular constraints on what one or both of the participants will treat as allowable contributions to the business at hand.’
• ‘Inferential frameworks and procedures that are particular to specific institutional contexts.’
5.1 Goal-orientation
‘Can we discuss the briefing next week.....’
‘I just wanted to talk to you about the ‘Fisher’ case.’
5.2 Special constraints e.g. Turn-taking; structure and framework of conversation (e.g.IRF) - lexical choice – technical jargon; institutional euphemisms
124
5.3 Inferential frameworks
Adjacency pairs e.g. Chris: Haven’t seen much in the way of sales the last half of the week. Joe: .hh Well, A lot of the media, the – the orders have been very difficult getting out. Stuff is – is jammed. (Koester 2006:5)
6. Institutional roles & identities
• Institutional talk – often asymmetrical:- differences in rights and obligations.
• Interactants take on specific institutional roles.
• Roles & identities are not FIXED but NEGOTIATED through talk.
7. Focus
1. How do work colleagues negotiate politeness and solidarity in work place encounters? (i) role of politeness strategies in softening potentially face-threatening acts; (ii) the useful role idioms play in negotiating difficult situations; (iii) strategies used by workers to build and maintain solidarity despite differences in status.
2. Conflict in collaborative talk: (i) How is disagreement formulated and structured? (ii) How is consensus negotiated?
8. Idioms etc.
‘Lost Order’ (Koester: 110)
See extract.
Cultural allusions 18 Paul: don’t know do yous
125
19 Mark: you don’t know 28: Paul: can’t win ‘em all 32: Paul: Win some you lose some
Metaphorical expressions
10 Paul: That’s a bit of a pain
26 Paul: It’s a pain isn’t it
‘Self-abasement’
Sorry – I screwed up on that one
I completely spaced out
9. Procedural discourse – see extracts in lecture
10. Some conclusions
• Whether people giving instructions or directives are inferior or superior from one another markers of solidarity are important – ‘relationship’ work is crucial in most workplace encounters.
• Power relationships between speakers can influence linguistic choice – superiors have the power to use more direct forms to assert authority.
• Markers expressing subjective stance
• Deontic modals – modal verbs that express obligation, necessity or involves notions of permission e.g. have to/should ‘You must go now’
• Epistemic modals – expressing how certain the factual status of a proposition is, e.g. must, surely, obviously, e.g. ‘You must be the Editor’
• Intensifiers e.g. Very; extremely
• Expletives/exclamations
• Idioms/metaphors (fixed expressions)
126
• Evaluative lexis e.g. ‘problem’; ‘difficult’
• Metalanguage e.g. I’m just saying
• Limited hedges/vague language/ambiguous utterances
11. Conflict discourse
• Disagreements become preferred response.
• Interruptions are frequent.
• Speakers use emphatic markers of subjective stance: modals expressing strong commitment or obligation; evaluative devices (e.g. adjectives); metaphors. versus
Decreased use of interpersonal markers – indirectness; vague language; hedges; modals of possibility, permission etc.
12. Summary
• Transactional goals interact with relational goals in the work place.
• A number of factors influence language choice: - the discursive relationship related to the overall goal of any conversation: - the institutional relationships/roles & the identities of the speakers.
• Discursive identities are not fixed but negotiated through talk.
13. POST-CLASS
Observe conversations at the University. Determine what makes them predominantly transactional or relational. Consider the linguistic markers which are used to express solidarity or a subjective stance. Discuss on Discussion Board.
127
LS1ELU
ENGLISH LANGUAGE IN USE
SSpprriinngg TTeerrmm
LLaanngguuaaggee aass aa SSoocciiaall PPhheennoommeennoonn
SSeemmiinnaarrss
128
LANGUAGE AS A SOCIAL PHENOMENON
SEMINAR 1
Language & Education
BACKGROUND
In Lecture Twelve we discussed studies investigating the disparity between a child’s
home/community language and that of the School. Most of these studies were in the USA. Today
we’re going to consider a study closer to home, in the UK.
Viv Edwards’ paper (in Coupland, N. & Jaworski, A. (1997) Sociolinguistics: A Reader and
Coursebook. London: MacMillan Press) is one of the seminal papers in ‘Language, Education
& Disadvantage’. She discusses the use of Patois (Creole speech) used by Afro-Caribbean
children in English schools in the City of Birmingham in the UK. She discusses interactional
contexts and the consequences of using Patois, in addition to the user’s perceptions about its use
and value.
One of the main themes of this paper is the need to confront the stereotype held in Britain that
Patois speakers are ‘young, disaffected, academically underachieving’(p.410) individuals and
that the variety is a ‘plantation English which is socially unacceptable and inadequate for
communication.’(p.409)
i. Discuss with fellow students the key issues and findings of this study and note them down.
ii. Also consider the following questions for discussion as a group.
(This might be useful for revision purposes so keep your notes!).
1. What factors appear to determine Black pupil’s shifting between Patois and the local dialect
of English?
2. What is meant by the assertion ‘that for any given situation there will be marked and
129
unmarked language choices?’ (p.410).
3. How is the use of Patois interpreted by the teacher/educational authorities and what are the
consequences?
4. To what extent do you think educational authorities and Governments should accommodate to
the needs of the minority – at least to ‘help them on their way’ to learning the standard? What
cultural/social/political/economic considerations have to come into play? Can you think of any
other minority groups in the UK for whom accommodation is necessary?
5. Can Bernstein’s Model of Elaborated and Restricted Code (as discussed in the lecture) inform
our interpretation of some of the views raised in this paper? What are the limitations of this
model and how might we interpret the use of Patois?
6. How does this compare with the situation of AAVE in the USA?
7. Beyond informing policy, in studying educational disadvantage, sociolinguists are also
interested in examining culture-bound perceptions and attitudes towards one’s own and other
groups’ linguistic and socio-cultural status? How might we investigate this as linguists?
130
LANGUAGE AS A SOCIAL PHENOMENON
SEMINAR 2
Language and the Media
Preface:
This seminar serves to extend and apply information provided in the language and media
lecture in ELS last term. We’re going to be considering the differences between tabloid and
broadsheet representation of ‘stories’ – both from a micro-linguistic perspective – looking at
the lexical and grammatical choices made by the journalists working for the different papers
but also from a discourse perspective – thinking about target audiences for these pieces and
how the actors/people in the stories are represented and how polarized perspectives are
generated.
1. Which of these articles do you think is from a tabloid and which from a broadsheet based on linguistic content alone?
You might like to think about the presence/absence of the following linguistic features:
TABLOIDS (are typically characterized by the use of) :
a) first names or nicknames;
b) idioms/clichés & slang;
c) contractions of grammar e.g. don’t
d) short, incomplete sentences; sentences without verbs; sentences beginning with a conjunction
(may also appear in broadsheets too however);
e) modal verbs used to insinuate things – ‘it might have been because’;
f) quotations – or typeface emphasis – e.g. use of bold or CAPS;
g) collocations – e.g. innocent victim; tragic accident
BROADSHEETS -
a) longer >complex sentences – e.g. use of relative clauses;
b) complex NPs;
c) nominalization;
c) passivisation;
d) quotations from authorities; official sources.
131
2. How do you engage with the articles – which do you feel most comfortable with - why? Who is the ideal reader for these articles? – consider the cultural and social/professional status of the readers. 3. In what ways are the various actors (the people mentioned) in the report represented (positioned) in each extract. Consider what identities are constructed (consider social status; professional; gender). Are certain actors more prominent than others.
4. How do the articles construct polarized positions and how does that impact on our interpretation of subject positions and events? e.g. Male versus female; innocence v guilt.
See articles on accompanying pages.
132
LANGUAGE AS A SOCIAL PHENOMENON
SEMINAR 3
Language Standardisation
1. Read the following extract (taken from Graddol et al 2007:108), it comes from The Arte
of Englishe Poesie, first published in 1589. You are not expected to understand every word. The extract discusses the variety of English to be used by poets (or ‘makers’ as they are also referred to in the text).
133
Just focussing on spelling conventions, what differences do you find in this extract compared to standardised English today?
2. What other differences did you find?
3. What are the main points that Puttenham is making?
4. Historians have argued that this document is evidence for the existence of a Standard English at the time it was written. What evidence, if any, can you find to support this claim?
5. Considering this as a planning document – would this be an example of corpus or status planning?
6. How is this document similar to contemporary documents/discussions you read/hear in
the media or in academic writing, in relation to concerns about the ‘preservation’ of a standard language in the UK?
134
LANGUAGE AS A SOCIAL PHENOMENON
SEMINAR 4
Language Play
Initially review these concepts which were described and illustrated in the lecture:
Repetition
Parallelism
Alliteration
Assonance
Onomatopoeia
Enjambement
Grammatical representations – e.g. Short sentences and phrases
Graphologically
1. The text ‘We’re going on a bear hunt’ is an example of language play in children’s literature. How does this text deviate from the norms of conventional language use? - phonologically; - lexically; - grammatically; - graphologically.
Discuss (see points above).
2. What is the effect of this linguistic representation?
3. Puns or paronomasia are phrases that deliberately exploit confusion between similar words for humorous or rhetorical/persuasive effect. By definition a pun must be deliberate or else it is classified as a malapropism. Puns can be classified into four categories – what are these?:
Classify these puns: a. He drove his car into a wall and found out how the Mercedes bends. b. Police were called to a family home where a baby was resisting a rest. c. What did the grape say when it got stepped on? Nothing - but it let out a little whine. d. I've been to the dentist several times so I know the drill.
135
e. A boiled egg in the morning is hard to beat. f. Santa's helpers are subordinate clauses.
Can you think of any more?
4. Guy Cook (2000) has suggested that there is a connection between ritual and language use. There is the formal patterning of sound and structure; semantic patterning and pragmatic patterning. Consider the ‘Lord’s Prayer’ and discuss its phonological, morphosyntactic (grammatical), semantic and pragmatic patterning. How similar is this to the prose discussed in (1) above? Our Father, who art in Heaven, hallowed be thy name thy kingdom come thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven give us this day our daily bread and forgive those who trespass against us, and lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil for thine is the kingdom, the power and the glory for ever and ever. Amen.