Download - TRANSITION CONGRUENCY
![Page 1: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
TRANSITION CONGRUENCY
JAMES H. KEELEY, DIRECTORPENNSYLVANIA JUVENILE CORRECTIONAL
EDUCATION
2004 TRANSITION CONFERENCEDECEMBER 8 & 9, 2004
SPONSORED BYNATIONAL EVALUATION AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CENTER
EDUCATION OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH WHO ARE NEGELECTED AND DELILNQUENT, AND AT-RISKFOR
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
![Page 2: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Report available at: www.nicic.org, adapted for a juvenile transition project in Pennsylvania
![Page 3: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
TRANSITION GOALS
Provide HOPE for delinquent/at-risk youth Increase Public Safety – Protecting the Community Reduce Recidivism Avoid New Victimization Better Use of Resources Provide opportunities for transformation Increase Educational Achievement – Build Competencies Increase Secondary Credential Acquisition Increase Matriculation to Post Secondary Opportunities Increase Employment Opportunities Increase Community Participation as Crime Free Citizens
![Page 4: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
STUDENT PROFILE
Average age: school – 16.3 institution 17.5
Age range: 12 up to 21 Population: Daily 792
Annual 1602 Gender: Male 93%, Female 7%
![Page 5: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
STUDENT PROFILE
Race: White – 30%, African American – 42%, Hispanic– 20%,Other -1%
Residence: Urban – 63%, Suburban – 16%, Rural 12%
![Page 6: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
STUDENT PROFILE
Academic Achievement:0 – 4th grade – 30% 5th – 8th grade – 40%
9th – 12th grade – 30%
Achievement deficit: 3 – 5 years below peers
Special Education Pre-Identified*01-02 = 49% 02-03 = 58%
* 3 – 9 times greater than general population
![Page 7: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Juvenile and Adult Releases
100,000 unconditional adult releases in 1999
100,000 Juveniles Released Annually (Sickmund,2000) )
![Page 8: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The Current Transition Process Does Not Adequately Protect the Public
We know how to operate effective interventions, but our ability to do so is hampered because residential, releasing, supervision, and human service agencies:
Have conflicting priorities Lack continuity in their transition policies and practices Do not share informationThere are too few effective interventions for released offenders Placement requirements reduce delinquents’ incentives for programs Programs have been cut to reduce costs Legislated restrictions – Public housing, employment, welfare benefits,
mandatory alternative education placement, student loansA growing number of offenders leave institutions at the end of long
sentences with no supervision or services
![Page 9: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Key Agencies in Transition Reform
Three agencies must take the lead in enabling Transition Reform in their jurisdictions:
Residential agency (which operates institutions) Releasing authority – Juvenile Court (which makes release and
revocation decisions) Supervision agency (which monitors, offenders released from
placements to the communities)These agencies must: Obtain approval of political leaders to proceed with Transition
Reform Sell the concept to other stakeholders Convene policy-level partnerships involving stakeholders
![Page 11: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Pennsylvania’s Transition Plan:Education & Residential History
Prior July 2003 Interagency Congruency not clearly established Communication inconsistent Information sharing restrictions Meeting schedule difficulties Meeting notices inconsistent Meeting attendees as available Treatment plan input uniformity inconsistent Transition plan at end of placement Community Contacting responsibilities unclear Court/Community involvement weak
![Page 13: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Pennsylvania’s Transition Plan:Education & Residential Future
Post July 2003 State level interagency direction agreement Meeting time compromise – 1 day/week – all disciplines represented Formal and informal regularly scheduled review meetings combined Division of labor:
– Meeting scheduling– Meeting process– Community contacting– Treatment plan content institution wide consistency
Transition plan begun at start of placement Court/Community involvement strategy developed & strengthened Title 1 Transition Clerk approved Teleconferencing utilization Information sharing restrictions under joint review
![Page 14: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
COURT TOINSTITUTION
QUARTERLY MCPC
TRANSITION MONITORED
TRANSITIONFINALIZED
MONTHLYMDT/MCPCCOMBINED
TRANSITIONBEGINS
TREATMENT PLAN DEVELOPEDMCPC, IPI/IEP
TRANSITION DESIGNED
INSTITUTIONAL TREATMENTPROGRAMS
COURT TOCOMMUNITYTRANSITION
IMPLEMENTED
TRANSITION STEPS
COMMUNITYTO COURT
DELINQUENT YOUTH
HOME
![Page 15: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Principles of Transition Accountability Plans (TAP)
Measure offenders’ static and dynamic risk factors using validated assessment tools
Specify programs to reduce offender’s dynamic risks Identify partners to help plan and implement plans for individual
offenders Develop TAP soon after an offender is admitted to prison
![Page 16: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Advantages of Transition Accountability Plans (TAP)
Allows administrators to accurately measure and reallocate resources needed to alter offenders’ dynamic risk factors
Identifies responsibilities of offenders, correctional agencies and system partners for:
– Creating,– Modifying, and– Implementing TAP
Promotes a continuum in interventions, services and information sharing over time and across and between agencies.
![Page 17: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Stakeholders Involved in Partnerships
Leaders Juvenile Justice (judges, prosecutors, police, probation board,
etc.) Elected officials (legislators, local officials) Agency directors (residential, health, human services,
housing, employment, etc.)Enablers Private foundations Media Other existing partnerships (state and/or community level)Institutions and Communities Administrators (residential, heath, mental health) Staff representing major functions (and their unions) Community supervision agencies and staff Victims and victim advocates Faith-based organizations Education community
![Page 18: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Need to Share Data
Effective case management requires different agencies to share data about persons with whom they work (e.g., residential, probation, health, employment, etc.)
Barriers to sharing must be over-come – e.g., confidentiality, turf, schedules
Case management is hampered if data sharing is:– Personal/Ad Hoc – works only if staff do not change– Expensive – redundant, labor-intensive– Slow-using manual transfer of paper records
We need a low-cost, seamless, real-time way to share information
![Page 19: TRANSITION CONGRUENCY](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814bfa550346895db8f578/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
FOR MORE INFORMATION
JAMES H. KEELEY, DirectorJuvenile Correctional Education
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION333 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17126-0333717 783 9202 – Office717 215 1910 – Cell717 783 4305 – [email protected]@aol.com