Download - THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided

Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018

1

THROWINGSHADE:AQUALITATIVESTUDYOFMICROINEQUITIESANDLEARNINGENGAGEMENTWITHINHIGHEREDUCATION

JosieL.AndrewsUniversityofTennessee,Knoxville

[email protected]

Abstract

Basedoninterviewdatafromaqualitativestudy,thisarticlehighlightstheperspectivesof

fivestudentsfromanAmericaninstitutionofhighereducationtogetabetter

understandingofthewaysinwhichmicroinequitiesinfluencelearningengagement.Three

majorthemesemergedfromtheinterviewdata:(1)feelingofdisconnection,(2)surface

learning,and(3)student‐teacherrelationship.Usingasocialconstructivismframework,I

argueforagreaterunderstandingofmicroinequitiesinthesocialandsituationalcontextin

whichtheyoccur,specificallywithineducationalclimates.Implicationsforeducatorswill

bediscussed,includinghowtocreateinclusive,supportive,anddemocraticlearning

climatesforalllearners.

Keywords:students,biascommunication,highereducation,learningclimates,learning

engagement,microinequities

Introduction

Microinequitiesoccurineverydaylives(Brennan,2016;Nadal,2017;Rowe,2008,

Schnellmann&Gibbons,1984),includingthelivesofstudentswhoattendcollegesand

universitiesintheUnitedStates.Rowe(2008)coinedthetermmicroinequitywhile

conductinga1973studyoninclusionwithintheworkplaceattheMassachusettsInstitute

ofTechnology.Rowewritesthatmicroinequitiesare“apparentlysmalleventswhichare

oftenephemeralandhard‐to‐prove,eventswhicharecovert,oftenunintentional,


2

frequentlyunrecognizedbytheperpetrator,whichoccurwhereverpeopleareperceivedto

bedifferent”(p.1).SandlerandHall(1986)refertomicroinequitiesas“waysinwhich

individualsareeithersingledout,oroverlooked,ignored,orotherwisediscountedonthe

basisofunchangeablecharacteristicssuchassex,race,orage.”(p.3;emphasisinoriginal).

Sueetal.(2007)describemicroinequitiesas“thepatternofbeingoverlooked,

underrespected,anddevaluedbecauseofone’sraceorgender”(p.273).

Literatureshowsthatcontemporaryscholars(e.g.,Brennan,2016;Hutchison&

Jenkins,2013;Nadal,2017;Saporu&Herbers,2015)refertoRowe’sdefinitionintheir

scholarshiponmicroinequitiesintheworkplace.Unfortunately,thereisnoprecise

definitionofmicroinequitiesastheyrelatetolearningclimatesineducationalinstitutions.

Forthisstudy,theoriginaldefinitionwillsuffice.Furthermore,contemporaryterminology

(e.g.biascommunication,unconsciousbias,hiddenbias)willbeusedinterchangeablywith

thetermmicroinequity.

Basedoninterviewanalysesfromaqualitativeapproach,thisstudyhighlights

perceptionsofmicroinequitiestogetabetterunderstandingofwaysinwhichthese

unconsciousbiasescouldinfluencelearningengagementintheclassroom.Usingasocial

constructivismframework,Iargueforagreaterunderstandingofmicroinequitiesinthe

socialandsituationalcontextinwhichtheyoccur,specificallywithinclassroomclimates.I

alsoargueforfutureareasoftheory,research,andpracticetopotentiallyfindwaysto

minimizetheeffectsofmicroinequitiesineducationalandvocationallearningspaces.

Implicationswillbeprovidedforeducatorswhoarestrivingtocreateinclusive,supportive,

anddemocraticlearningclimates,aswellasincreaseretentionineducationallearning

spaces.


3

ResearchProblem

Rowe(2008)positsthatmicroinequitiesdonotrequireactiveintentiononthepart

oftheperpetrator;however,theaccumulationofunconsciousbiasesandprejudicescan

resultinexclusion,impairworkplaceorclassroomperformance,anddiminishself‐esteem

(SaporuandHerbers,2015).Muchoftheexistingliteratureonthecumulativeeffectsof

microinequitiespresentsindividuals’experienceswithinworkplacelearningspacesand

focusesprimarilyongenderandraceschemas(Brennan,2016;Hutchinson&Jenkins,

2013;Nadal,2017;Rowe2008;Sandler&Hall,1986;Saporu&Herbers,2015;Young

2006)andispredominantlyquantitativeinnature.Withrespecttoacademiclearning

spaces,therelativelysmallerandmostlydatedliteratureonmicroinequitiesandtheir

impactsonlearningengagementfocusesexclusivelyongender,race,andsexualorientation

schemas(Beagan,2001;Cranston1989;Sandler&Hall,1986;Schnellmann&Gibbons,

1984).Theliteraturealsoencompassespsychologicalorientations(Cranston&Leonard,

1990;Meadors&Murray,2014).Whencomparedtotheresearchonmicroinequities

withintheworkplacelearningclimates,researchwithinacademiclearningclimatesisalso

predominatelyquantitativeinnature.Fromaqualitativeapproach,weknowrelatively

littleabout(1)howmicroinequitiesinfluencelearningengagementintheclassroomand

(2)howstudentlearnerscopewiththeirexperiencesofmicroinequities.

ResearchPurpose

Thepurposeofthisstudywastoqualitativelyexplorestudents’experiencesof

microinequitiestogetabetterunderstandingofthewaysinwhichmicroinequities


4

influencelearningengagement.Twooverarchingresearchquestionsguidedthe

investigation:

1.Howdostudents’experiencesofmicroinequitiesinfluencelearningengagement

inhighereducation?

2.Inwhatwaysdostudentscopewiththeexperiencesofmicroinequitiesinhigher

education?

LiteratureReview

Thefollowingsectionsintroduceanddiscussthethreespecificareas:learning

engagementinlearningspaces,perception,andcommunication,astheyrelatetothe

understandingofmicroinequitiesintheclassroom.

LearningEngagement

Democracyandinclusionpromotesafelearningclimateswithinadultandhigher

educationalinstitutions(Andrews&Misawa,2017;Williams,Woodson,&Wallace,2016).

Williamsetal.(2016)assertthatlearningspacesthatpromotesafelearningclimateshave

thepotentialtofosterengagementandexplorationofcreativity.Engagement,operationally

speaking,isdifficulttodefine;however,itisobviousbothwhenpresentandwhenmissing

(Saeed&Zyngier,2012).Engagement,Kuh(2009)states,isthequalityofeffortand

participationwhichlearnersemployinrealisticlearningactivities.Schlechty(2002,as

citedinSaeed&Zyngier,2012)adds:

Engagementisactive.Itrequiresthestudentstobeattentiveaswellasinattendance;

itrequiresthestudentstobecommittedtothetaskandfindsomeinherentvaluein

what he or she is being asked to do. The engaged student not only does the task

assignedbutalsodoesthetaskwithenthusiasmanddiligence.(p.255)


5

Unfortunately,whensubtleeffectsofmicroinequitiesimpedeengagementwithina

learningsetting,alearnercouldfeelasenseofisolation,marginalization,andexclusion

(Brennan,2016;Nadal,2017).Theaccumulationofdisparagingcomments,unintentional

acts,orinvalidationswithinlearningspacescreatesexclusion,impairsworkplaceor

classroomperformance,anddiminishesself‐esteem(Saporu&Herbers,2015).When

consideringlearninginanysetting,theaccumulationsofbiascommunicationcanhave

psychologicalandphysicaleffects,includingsadness,lossofcreativityandengagement,

andlowworkperformance(Nadal,2017).Nadaladdsthattheeffectsofunconsciousbias

canalsoleadtohighturnover,lowmorale,anddecreasedproductivitywithinthe

workplace.

Kahu(2013)believesthatunderstandingthemagnitudeofengagementandits

impactonacademicsinhighereducationrequiresapsychologicalapproach.Shesuggests

thatateachercanframelearners’engagementbyconsideringbehavior,cognition,and

emotionaldimensionsoflearning.Kahu’spsychologicalperspectiveonlearningisnota

newconcept;however,itcorroboratesForgas’(2000)philosophythatfeelingandthinking

areinterconnecteddomainsandcannotbeseparatefromthelearningprocess.Kahu’s

psychologicalapproachtoengagementalsosupportsIlleris’(2002)viewpointthatthe

learningencompassesthecognitive,affective,andsocialdimensions.Itshouldbenoted

thatinlaterworksIllerischangedthesetermstocontent,incentive,andenvironment.

However,hisoriginaltermshavebeenmaintainedinthissectionbecausetheyaresimple

andrelevanttothecontentofthisarticle.Despitethechangeofterminology,Illeris(2017)

maintains,inhissecondeditionofHowWeLearn:LearningandNon‐FormalinSchooland


6

Beyond,that“alllearninginvolvesthesethreedimensions,whichmustalwaysbe

consideredifanunderstandingoranalysisofalearningsituationistobeadequate”(p.24).

Perception

Microinequitieslieintheeyesofthebeholder;therefore,theperceptionsof

microinequitiesmakeithardtorecognizeorprove,especiallywhenthereareother

reasonableexplanations(Chun&Evan,2015;Rowe,2008).Becauseoftheconstructionof

reality,ChunandEvan(2015)claimthatperceptionsofmicroinequitiesallowthe

individualtobecometheexpertonwhatconstitutesamicroinequity.Individualswho

experienced,orperceivedthattheyhaveexperienced,microinequitiesinlearningspaces

describedanambiguoussenseofdisrespect,insult,orslight(Brennan,2016;Hutchinson&

Jenkins,2013).

Althoughresearchindicatesthatperceptionisnotanaccuratereflectionofreality,

SchnellmannandGibbons(1984)disagree.In1984,theseresearchersconducteda

quantitativestudytodeterminewhetherwomenandotherminoritystudentsperceiveda

lessencouragingclassroomclimatethantheirwhitemalecounterparts.Schnellmannand

Gibbons’findingsindicatethatanindividual’sperceptionofrealityinformshisorher

beliefsandbehaviors.Kiraly(2014)addsthatindividualsperceiveandunderstandtheir

realitythroughtheirownpositionalitywithinthesocialcontext.Thesestatements

emphasize(1)thatrealityisconstructedthroughsocialinteractionwithone’s

environment,and(2)theexperienceoflearninghasanemotionalaspect.Unintentional

exclusionarypractices,suchasmicroinequities,canemotionallyinfluencelearners’

attitudesandbehaviors(Chun&Evan,2015)towardlearning,includingloweringacademic

aspirationsandachievements,decreasingself‐efficacy,anddecreasingmotivation.


7

Communication

Communication,bothverbalandnon‐verbal,issalienttoanyenvironmentwhere

learningexperiencesoccur(e.g.,Churches,2010;Knapp,Hall,&Horgan,2014).Literature

oncommunicationoftencitesearlierresearchfromAlfredMehrabian(1968),who

maintainsthatcommunicationiscomprisedof93%non‐verbaland7%verbal.Verbal

communicationtendstoplaceemphasisonthecognitivefacetsofinterpersonal

interactions(McCroskey,Richmond,&Bennett,2006;Meadors&Murray,2014;).

Unlikeverbalcommunication,non‐verbalcommunicationplaysamoreemotionalor

affectiveroleinsendingandreceivingmessages(Knappetal.,2014;McCroskeyetal.,

2006;Meadors&Murray,2014).Churches(2010)positsthattheemotionalclimateofthe

learningspaceinfluenceslearnersjustasmuchastheeffectivenessofthecurriculum.

Morreale,Spitzberg,andBarge(2007)definenon‐verbalcommunicationasanyhuman

behaviors,objectsorcharacteristicsthatconveyamessage–otherthanwords.Non‐verbal

communicationincludesfacialexpression,eyecontact,bodyposition,gesture,pitchand

toneofvoice,personaldistance,attentivesilence,andtouch(Bambaeeroo&Shokrpour,

2017;Baron,2009).

Non‐verbalelementsofcommunicationcanemphasize,distractfrom,orcontradict

averbalmessage(DeLamater&Myers,2011;Meadors&Murray,2014).Whenthereisa

discrepancybetweenverbalandnon‐verbalcommunication,individualswillrespondmore

frequentlytothenon‐verbalcommunication(Churches,2010;DeLamater&Myers,2011;

Meadors&Murray,2014;Mehrabian,2009).Okon(2011)contendsiftheincongruityisnot

resolved,itcouldpossiblysetthetonefortheescalationofconflict.Lincoln(2002)


8

describeshowconflictcouldoccurwhenanindividualperceivesthattheverbalmessage

thatisbeingdeliveredisnotgenuineorcontradictthenon‐verbalbehaviors.

Quantitativefindingsimplythattherearecorrelationsbetweenteachers’verbaland

non‐verbalbehaviorsaswellasstudents’achievementandgoodbehaviorandstudents’

learningandmotivation(Bambaeeroo&Shokrpour,2017).In1982,HallandSandler

noted:

[N]onverbalbehaviorscansignalinclusionorexclusionofgroupmembers;indicate

interestandattentionortheopposite;communicateexpectationsofstudentsuccess

orfailure;andfosterorimpedestudents’confidenceintheirownabilitiestolearn

specifictasksandprocedures.(p.6)

Over35yearslater,thisstatementcontinuestoconveytheimportanceofunderstanding

non‐verbalcommunicationandaddscredibilitytotheconceptthatifthenon‐verbal

communicationisperceivedtobeahiddenbias,thenitcouldpossiblyhaveanadverse

effectonastudent’sengagementwithinlearningclimates.

SocialConstructivismFramework

JohnDewey(1916),perhapsoneoftheprominenteducationalscholarsof

thetwentiethcentury,believedthateducationisnotabouttellingbutaboutdoing.Dewey

andmanyothersocialconstructivistshaveresearched,theorized,andpracticedthe

conceptthatlearningisconstructedthroughsocialinteractionandconcludedthatdoing

andknowingcannotbetreatedseparately(Bandura,1977,Beck&Kosnik,2006;Bruner

1986;Burr,2015;Vygotsky,2012;Piaget,2013).Socialconstructivismparadigmwas

chosenbecauseofitsepistemologicalassumptionsaboutthenatureofknowledgeandhow

individualswithinaspecificsocialcontextcanconstructvariousrealities.


9

Socialconstructivistsacknowledgethatlearningprocessesoccurinternallyinan

individual;however,theyconsideritminusculebecausethenatureandcontentoflearning

processesaredeterminedbysocialcontext,inwhichindividualsunderstandandinterpret

theirexperiencesintheworld(Burr,2015;Illeris,2017).Perhapsonecanconcludethat

vastinterpretationsofexperiencesbegetmultiplerealities.Reality,asitrelatestosocial

constructivism,hasmultiplerealitiesdependingone’ssocialandsocietalpositionsinthe

world(Jonassen,Myers,&McKillop,1996).Multiplerealties,basedoncultureandsocial

facets,areperhapsamongthemostsalientattributesofconstructivists’paradigm(Kiraly,

2014).

ResearcherReflection

AsanAfrican‐Americanfemalegraduatestudentinhighereducation,Ihave

experiencedorperceivedthatIhadexperiencedsomeformsofmicroinequitieswithinthe

classroom.Therefore,myknowledgeofexistingmicroinequitiesliteratureinformedmy

preconceptions.Attheinceptionofthisqualitativeinvestigation,Ibelievedthat(a)subtle

formsofbiascommunicationexistedinthecultureofhighereducation(b)adultlearners

interpretedtheirperceptionsofmicroinequitiesindiverseways,and(c)perceptionsof

microinequitiescouldcontributetonegativedevelopmental,psychological,andsocial

outcomes.IacknowledgethattheseperspectiveslikelyinfluencedthemethodsthatIused

andmyinterpretationofthecollecteddata.Consideringmysubjectivityasitrelatestothis

researchtopic,Ihopethatmyparticipationinthisconversationwilladdavoiceto

understandingandcombatingmicroinequitiesinlearningspaces.


10

ResearchDesign

Toexploretheconceptofmicroinequitiesastheyrelatetostudents’learning

engagement,aqualitativeapproachwasusedtoexploretheexperiencesoffivestudents

withinanAmericaninstitutionofhighereducation.BogdanandBiklen(2012)suggestthat

aqualitativeapproachtoresearchprovidesresearcherswiththeopportunityto

understandwaysinwhichpeoplemakesenseoftheirlives.Theauthorsalsonotethat

qualitativeresearchers“seektograsptheprocessbywhichpeopleconstructmeaningand

todescribewhatthosemeaningsare”(p.48).

ParticipantsandDataCollection

ParticipantswererecruitedfromtheCollegeofEducationwithintheUniversityof

PNY(pseudonym),apublicuniversitylocatedintheSoutheasternregionoftheUnited

States.Thesampleforthisstudyconsistedoffiveparticipants:Amy,Henry,Stacy,Luke,

andNancy.Thecriteriaforthestudyparticipantsincluded(a)be19yearsofageorolder,

(b)beanactivestudentwithintheCollegeofEducation,and(c)demonstratethe

willingnessandavailabilitytoparticipate.

DataCollectionandAnalysis

Ingeneral,interviewsareconsideredoneofthemostcommonresearchtoolsin

qualitativeresearchthatbuildsaholisticsnapshot,analyzeswords,andreportsdetailed

viewsofinformants(Edward&Hollands,2013).Spradley(2016)pointsoutthat

interviewsareconsideredaseriesoffriendlyconversations.Inordertosetsome

parametersforthesefriendlyconversations,asemi‐structuredinterviewguidewasusedto

maximizeflexibilityduringtheinterviewprocess.Eachparticipantvoluntaryparticipated


11

inaface‐to‐faceaudio‐recordedinterviewsessionthatlasted45‐70minutesinlengthand

consistedofopen‐endedquestions.

Priortothebeginningoftheaudio‐recordedinterviewsession,eachparticipantwas

providedaninformedconsentformthatprovidedthestudyobjectives,procedures,

duration,risks,benefits,confidentialityofrecords,contactinformationforanyquestions

regardingtheresearchstudy.Aftertheparticipantssignedandconsentedtoparticipatein

theresearchstudy,theywereensuredofcompleteanonymityandconfidentiality.Inan

efforttoprovideanonymityandconfidentiality,allidentifyingmarkerswereremovedfrom

thedatacollectionandnoinformationwasquotedinawaythatwouldleadtothe

participants’identification.Inanattempttoavoidinaccuraciesormisrepresentationsof

data,aface‐to‐facemeetingwasheldwitheachparticipanttogivehimorheran

opportunitytomembercheckhisorhertranscribednarrative.

Aftertranscribingtheinterviewsverbatim,Iusedathematicanalysistechniqueto

code,categorize,andthemepatternsthatwerecommontoallparticipants(Guest,

MacQueen,&Namey,2012).Initially,opencodingwasusetoreadandre‐readparticipants’

wordstogeneratecodesofinformation.Opencodingprovidedmetheopportunityto

organizethedatainto“chunks”(Rossman&Rallis,2016).Next,thecodeswereorganized

intosimilarcategories.Finally,therelatedcategorieswereusedtocreatethemes,which

wereusedtoprovidedescriptionsofthestudents’experiencesofmicroinequitiesand

copingstrategies.

Findings

Threemajorthemeswereidentifiedusingthethematicanalysisprocessdescribed

intheprevioussection:(1)feelingofdisconnection,(2)surfacelearning,and(3)student‐


12

teacherrelationship.Eachmajorthemeisdefinedandexplainedinthefollowingsections,

alongwithquotestodemonstratethemeaningandsignificanceofthefindings.

FeelingofDisconnection

Inthisstudy,thefeelingofdisconnectionisdepictedasawayinwhichparticipants

viewedtheirconnectionwithbothhisorherinstructorandlearningprocess.Afeelingof

disconnectionhindersaperson’sabilitytoactivelyengageinactivities,suchasthose

withinaclassroom.Theinabilitytobeactivelyengagedinactivitiesisrelatedtointrinsic

motivation(Niemiec&Ryan,2009).Theseauthorsassertthatwhenindividualsare

intrinsicallymotivatedtheyexploreandengageinacademicactivities.However,under

certainconditions(e.g.theexperiencesofmicroinequities),theintrinsicmotivationof

activeparticipationandengagementinaneducationalclimatecanbereplacedwiththe

experienceofisolationandalienation(Niemiec&Ryan,2009).

Henrydescribedhisfeelingofdisconnectionasthelackofacknowledgmentinthe

classroom.Heexpressed:

Ifeelit’simportantthattheteacherknowsthatpersoninhisorherclassroom,itshowscareorconcernthatyou’reintheirclassroom.Apersonfeelsmoreobligatedtolearniftheyfeel‘okay,she’sgoingtocallonme,she’sgoingtocallmyname.’Iftheyshoweyecontact,knowalloftheirstudents’names,callonalltheirstudentseveryonceandawhile,itshowsthatpossiblyhecares,orshecares.Itshowsarelationshipmoresothanwe’rejustanumbersittingoverthere…justanotherpartofthatfurnituresittingintheclassroom.

Henrycontinuedtoexplainthathiseducator’sverbalandnon‐verbalcommunication

createdanatmospherethatmadehimfeelnotonlyadisconnectionbutasenseof

ambiguity.Hestated:

Andyouwerealwaysunsureaboutwhatthisparticularprofessormeant.Theattitudeinwhichsherespondedtome.It[attitude]madeitveryhardtopayattentionortolistenandIwasalwayswondering‘okay’isitme.


13

Scarlett(2015)statesthatstudentswhofeeladisconnectionbecomeisolatedfrom

thelearningprocess.Theauthorcontinuestopointoutthatthefeelingofisolation

becomesachallengebecauseitinhibitsmanythings(e.g.,participation,collaboration,

motivation)thataresalientforsuccessinalearningsetting,includingactivelearning

engagement.Thefeelingofisolationcanalsocreatealessencouragingclassroomclimate

duetodifferentialtreatment(Scarlett,2015;Schnellmann&Gibbons,1984).Luke’sfeeling

ofdisconnectionwasrelatedtohisperceivedexperienceofdifferentialtreatment.He

responded:

She[theinstructor]engagedmorewithacertaingroupintheclass.Shefocusedallherattentiononthemtothepointtowhereitcausedtherestoftheclasstodisengagetoacertaindegreeortoalotofdegree.Peoplewilldisengageiftheyfeelthattheirpresenceisnotwarranted.IhavedisengagedtoacertaindegreeandwhenIdid,itshowedinmywork.

Unfortunately,thosestudentswhoexperiencedasenseofdisconnectionfeltisolatedand

alienatedfromthefaculty,staff,institution,andpeers(Kahu&Nelson,2018;Strayhorn,

2012).Disconnectioncanbecomeproblematicforstudentsbecauseitalsoencourages

disengagementandinhibitsacademicsuccess.

Thefeelingofdisconnectiondemonstratestheparticipants’desiretohaveapositive

interpersonalconnection,specificallywiththeinstructor.Literatureimpliesthatapositive

interpersonalconnectionbuildsasenseofbelonging(Baumeister&Leary,1995;Kahu&

Nelson,2018).Theneedforbelongingisabasichumanneed(Kahu&Nelson,2018;

Maslow,1943;Strayhorn,2012).Withinanacademicclimate,theneedofbelongingisthe

learner’sconnectednesstotheinstitution,facultyandstaff,aswellashisorherpeers

(Baumeister&Leary,1995;Kahu&Nelson,2018).Belonging,Strayhorn(2012)notes,isan


14

essentialfactorthatcontributestowhathedescribesas“realconsequences”likeacademic

successandstudentattrition(p.x;emphasisinoriginal).

In2017,theNationalSurveyofStudentEngagementconductedastudyand

revealedthatstudentswhoparticipateinaclassroomthatpracticesinclusivityhavea

greateropportunityto(1)enhancetheirhigher‐orderthinking,(2)engageininteractive

learning,(3)andhavepositiveperceptionsofsupport(e.g.,faculty,staff,peers).Empirical

andtheoreticalstudiesgivecredibilitytotheideologiesthatasenseofbelongingwithinan

inclusivelearningenvironmentincreasesacademicself‐efficacy,improvesparticipationin

thelearningprocess,andincreasesintrinsicmotivation(Freeman,Anderman,&Jensen,

2010).

SurfaceLearning

Thesecondthemetoemergefromthestudywassurfacelearning.Inthispresent

research,participantsperceivedthatthenegativeeffectsofbiascommunicationof

microinequitiescreatedsurfacelearning,whichisasuperficialapproachtolearningthat

impliesthatastudentmemorizesfactsandlearnsjustenoughtopassthecourse(Biggs,

2001;Everaert,Opdecam,&Maussen,2017;Howie&Bagnall,2013;Lucas,2001).A

surfacelearningapproachisanattemptinwhichastudentputsforthminimumeffortto

avoidacademicfailure,whichoftenleadstoloweracademicperformance.Furthermore,

Everaertetal.(2017).conductedastudyandconcludedthatthereisacorrelationbetween

surfacelearningapproachandnegativeacademicperformance.Thestudyalsorevealeda

relationbetweendeeplearningapproachandpositiveacademicperformance.

Choosingthesurfacelearningapproachisnotalearner’scharacteristicbuta

responsetohowalearnerperceivesthelearningclimate(Everaertetal.,2017;Lucas,


15

2001).GarrisonandCleveland‐Innes(2005)addthatsomestudentsengageinthesurface

learningapproachbecauseofthesocialandsituationalcontextofthelearning

environment.Inthiscurrentstudy,Lukedescribedhisexperiencesofmicroinequitiesand

howthesesubtlebiasesimpactedhisperceptionofinstructorsandapproachtolearning.

Lukestated:

IwenttoaprivatehighschoolandImadegoodgradesbecauseteachersputinalotofeffortwiththeirpupilsatthetime.Hereat[UniversityofPNY],theteachersdonotvaluestudents’success.Istartedmissingclass.Ifeltlikemypresencewasnotmissed.So,Iwouldshowupandjustuh‘wingit.’Ishowupforjustenoughsessionstopasstheclasswith,youknow,withthebareminimal.Aspreviouslymentioned,astudent’sperceptionofthelearningenvironment(e.g.

socialinteraction,communication,senseofbelonging)playsasignificantroleinhisorher

approachtolearning(DeLotell,Millam,&Reinhardt,2010;Garrison&Cleveland‐Innes,

2005;Lucas,2001).Infact,DeLotelletal.(2010)implythattheeducatorisatthecenterof

thestudent’slearningexperience;therefore,theeducatorisinthepositiontofostera

positiveornegativeperceptionofthelearningclimate.Anexampleofhowaneducatorcan

influenceastudent’sperceptionisdemonstratedthroughNancy’slearningexperience.She

explained:

AlthoughIhaveanAintheclass,herbehaviorandnonchalantattitudeaffectsmebecauseIstilldon’tunderstandhalfofthethings.So,I’maffectedbythewayshejustbrushesitoffandIstillhavetogettutoringontheside.Sheisnotgoingtostayafterclassandhelpwiththematerial,sometimesshemightbutitdependsonher…dependingonwhatdayitis.Despitethelackofencouragementandsupportfromtheeducator,Nancy

demonstratedacommitmenttoheracademicsuccesswithintheclassroombyseeking

assistanceforatutor.Inthisinstance,thestudent’sperceptionofthelearningenvironment

didnotlowerheracademicperformancebutperhapscreatedanegativeandunsupportive


16

relationshipwiththeeducator,whichgivesweighttopriorresearchthatimplieslearningis

influencedbysocialinteraction(Garrison&Cleveland‐Innes,2005;Illeris,2017).

Student‐TeacherRelationship

Thethoughtthatsocialandsituationalcontextofthelearningenvironment

influencescertainaspectsoflearningencompassesthelasttheme:student‐teacher

relationship.Inthispresentresearch,student‐teacherrelationshipisdefined“asthe

generalizedinterpersonalmeaningstudentsandteachersattachtotheirinteractionswith

eachother”(Wubbelsetal.,2014,p.364).Empiricalandtheoreticalresearchindicatethat

thequalityofteacher‐studentrelationshipshasamajorimpactonlearningacquisitionand

collegecompletion(Hoffman,2014),aswellasengagement,studentachievement,and

studentsatisfaction(hook,2003;Rowan&Grootenboer,2017.)Scholars(e.g.,hook;Rowan

&Grootenboer)pointoutthatthefundamentalresponsibilitiesofaneducatoraretocreate

alearningclimatethatfostersmutualrespectandtoencouragetheco‐constructionof

knowledgebetweenthestudentandtheeducator.Infact,aclassroomshouldbe“aplace

thatislife‐sustainingandmind‐expanding,aplaceofliberatingmutualitywhereteacher

andstudenttogetherworkinpartnership”(hook,2003,p.xv).

Despitetheimplicationsofpositiveoutcomesofthesestudent‐teacher

relationships,negativestudent‐teacherrelationshipshavebecomemorefrequentinhigher

education,particularlywheneducatorsengageinharmfulbehaviors(Hoffman,2014).

Wheneducatorsdisplaymicroinequitieswithinthelearningspace,anegativestudent‐

teacherrelationshipcouldensuecausingthestudenttobecomepassiveandlesslikelyto

activelyparticipateinthelearningprocess(Wentzel&Ramani,2016).Anegative


17

relationshipcanalsocausethestudenttosufferpsychologicaldilemmas,developdistrust,

andexperiencealossofself‐esteem(Sueetal.,2007).Inthiscurrentstudy,Amycandidly

spokeabouthernegativestudent‐teacherrelationshipbetweenherandherprofessor.She

indicatedthatherprofessor“throwsalotofshade.”“Throwingshade”isacolloquial

expressionusedtoverballyinsultorexpresscontemptforsomeone(Huba&Kronberg,

2016).Sheexplained:

He“throwsalotofshade.”[and]youjustdon’twanttobeinteractivewithhim.Idon’tfeelcomfortableaskinghimanythingaboutthecourseworkbecausehelaughsandmakesjokes.He’sjokingaroundandlaughing“girlgoneon,”“you’llgetit”youknowsomethinglikethat.He’soneofthose,youjustwriteitdownandjustgohead,youknow.

Thesocialandsituationalcontextsinwhichstudent‐teacherinteractionsoccurhave

anoteworthyinfluenceonthetypeofrelationshipsthatdevelopsbetweenthetwoparties

(Hoffman,2014).Hoffman(2014)suggeststhatnegativerelationshipsbetweenstudents

andteachers,asdemonstratedabove,aredetrimentaltoacademicsuccessbecausethey

diminishself‐esteem,causedisengagementfromclassroomactivity,andcontributetothe

failureofnotfinishingthecourse.Despitethesedisadvantageouseffectsofnegative

interpersonalrelationships,thevastliteratureonstudent‐teacherconnectionsshowsthat

positiveinteractionsbetweenstudentsandteacherscanincreasestudentmotivationand

academicsuccess,aswellasencouragecollegepersistence(Hoffman,2014;Rowan&

Grootenboer,2017;Wubbelsetal.,2014).

Limitations

Therearesomelimitationstothiscurrentstudy.Theresearchinquiryfocused

primarilyonmicroinequitiesanditsimpactsonlearningengagementinface‐to‐face

educationalinstitutions.Duetothislimitation,otherlearningspaces,suchasworkplace


18

andonlinelearning,wereexcluded.Theresearchalsofocusedspecificallyonstudents

withintheCollegeofEducationofaninstitutionofhigherlearningintheUnitedStates.

Althoughthestudents’experiencesinthiscurrentstudycannotbegeneralizedtoother

CollegesofEducation,theiruniquepositionsgiveanaturalisticgeneralization(Chenail,

2010;Stake,2005).

Discussion

Thispresentstudywasdesignedtogetabetterunderstandingofthewaysinwhich

biascommunicationcouldinfluencelearningengagementintheclassroom.Areviewofthe

literatureonmicroinequitiesfoundthattheaccumulationoftheseinvalidationsmaycreate

alearningclimate,wherethestudentmayfeel“humiliationandsocialrejection”(Nadal,

2017,p.681).Inaddition,areviewoftheliteratureindicatesthatmicroinequitiescould

impedeastudent’slearningengagementintheclassroom(Brennan,2016),perceptionof

realityisconstructedthroughanindividual’spositionalityintheirsocialcontext(Kiraly,

2014),andnegativecommunicationcouldhaveanadverseimpactonthelearner’sfeeling

ofbelonging,confidence,andachievementinthelearningspace(Bambaeeroo&

Shokrpour,2017).

Thepurposeofthisstudywastoqualitativelyexplorestudents’experiencesof

microinequitiestogetabetterunderstandingofthewaysinwhichmicroinequities

influencelearningengagement.Thisstudyrevealedthat(1)afeelingofdisconnection,(2)

surfaceapproachtolearning,and(3)anegativestudent‐to‐teacherrelationshipareways

inwhichmicroinequitiesinfluencelearningengagementinhighereducation.These

findingsalsosupporttheideologieswithintheliteraturethattheaccumulationof

microinequitiescancreateexclusion,impairperformanceinlearningclimates,increasethe


19

feelingofdiscouragement,andperpetuateasenseofdisrespect,insult,orslight(Brennan,

2016;Sandler&Hall,1986).

Understandingmicroinequitiesandtheirimpactonstudents’learningengagement

showedthatstudentsusedavoidancetocopewiththeexperiencesofmicroinequities.In

thisstudy,eachparticipantusedavoidanceasacopingstrategy.Scholars(e.g.,Brennan,

2016;Hutchinson&Jenkins,2013)pointoutthattargetsofmicroinequitiesdolittlewhen

facedwiththebehaviorsofmicroinequitiesbecauseofthefearofretaliation,thelackof

institutionalsupport,andattributionalambiguity.Withrespecttothelatter,Sue(2010)

describesattributionalambiguityasa“motivationaluncertaintyinthatthemotivesand

meaningofaperson’sactionsareunclearandhazy”(p.17).Theperceptionsof

microinequitiesmakeithardtorecognizeorprove,especiallywhenthereareother

reasonableexplanations,whichoftenleadstheindividualtodismisstheexperienceorself‐

blame(Chun&Evan,2015;Rowe,2008).

Implications

Theminutenatureofmicroinequitiescreatesachallengeforeducatorswhoteachat

institutionsofhigherlearning(Nadal,2017;Saporu&Herbers,2015)becausethese

behaviorsaresubtle,hard‐to‐prove,unintentional,andoftenhavevaguemeanings.So,the

questionishowdoeducatorsandacademicinstitutionsmoveforwardinorderto

minimizemicroinequitieswhilecreatingmoreinclusive,supportive,anddemocratic

learningclimatesthatsupportacademicsuccess?Thefollowingsectionshighlight

participatingindirectcommunication,implementingorganizationpoliciesandprocedures,

andattending/conductingcivilitytrainingandworkshops,andbuildingstudent‐teacher


20

relationshipsaspragmaticstrategiestocreatesafer,moredemocratic,andinclusive

learningenvironments.

DirectCommunication

Directcommunicationisperhapsthemosteffectivewaytoaddressmicroinequities

intheclassroom(Rowe,2008;Sueetal.,2007;Nadal,2017).Sueetal.mention,makethe

invisiblevisibleandprovideopportunityforeducatorstocreateasafeenvironmentwhere

alllearnerscanfeelsafewithouthavingthefearofbeingexcludedfromthelearning

process.Toraiseawarenessaboutmicroinequities,facultycancommunicateappropriate

socialandinterpersonalbehavioralexpectationsduringface‐to‐faceconversationsaswell

asintheirsyllabus(Morrissette,2001).Tofurtherreducemicroinequitieswithinthe

academy,theinstitutioncanraiseawarenessofmicroinequitiesbydevelopingand

executingacampuscivilitystatementandcivilityinitiatives(Freedman&Vreven,2017).

Implementationofclass‐levelororganizationpolicy/procedures

Itissalientthatinstitutionsofhigherlearningdeveloporreviseprogramsand

policiestoreduceandultimatelyeliminateuncivilbehaviors,suchasmicroinequities(Reio

&Ghosh,2009).Theauthorsrecommendthatthedevelopmentandimplementationof

class‐levelandorganization‐levelpoliciesstateandoutlineaclearandpreciseprotocolfor

confidentialreportingofuncivilbehaviors,andperhapsestablishmildtoseverepenalties

fortheperpetrators.

CivilityTraining

Anotherstrategytoraiseawarenessofuncivilbehaviors,suchasmicroinequities,

onAmericancollegeanduniversitiescampusesiscivilitytraining.Tobeeffective,civility

trainingshouldaddressdefiningcivilityandwhyitisimportant(Freedman&Vreven,


21

2017).Theauthorsaddthatcivilitytrainingshouldalsoaddresspoliteness,diversity

awareness,andculturalsensitivity(Wright&Hill,2015).WrightandHillconcludethat

civilitytrainingreinforcesorganizationalpoliciesonuncivilbehaviorsinacademic

classroomsanditsconsequencesforfaculty,students,andadministrators.

BuildingStudent‐TeacherRelationship

Inthiscurrentstudy,students’experiencesdemonstratehowbiascommunication,

verbalandnon‐verbal,affectsinterpersonalinteractionsandthelearner’sengagement.

Researchindicatesthatactsofmicroinequities(e.g.,ridicule,exclusion)exhibitedby

educatorstowardcertainstudentscanleadtoafeelingofincompetence,adecreasein

intrinsicmotivation(Brennan,2016;Nadal,2017),andfeelingofdisconnection(Strayhorn,

2012).Perhapsonewayofenhancingthestudent’sacademicsuccessisfosteringstudent

connectednessthroughbuildingapositivestudent‐teacherrelationship.In2017,Brown

andStarrettconductedanempiricalstudyonstudents’perceptionofconnectednessandits

impactoftheiracademicsuccess.Thestudyrevealedthreereasonswhyconnectednessis

salienttoacademicperformance:(1)increasesmotivation,(2)improvesretention,and(3)

fostersself‐efficacy.Mostimportantly,theresultsrevealedthat94%ofstudentsperceived

thatconnectednessorasenseofbelongingimprovedtheireducationalperformance.

Conclusion

Microinequitiesaresmall,subtle,unintentional,andhard‐to‐proveinsultsorslights

(Rowe,2008)withdevastatingimplicationsforastudent’slearningengagementand

academicsuccessinAmericanhighereducation,includingfeelingofdisconnected,

participatinginsurfacelearning,anddealingwithnegativestudent‐teacherrelationships.

Learningtoeffectivelycommunicatewithstudents,implementingclass‐levelcivility


22

policies,attendingcivilitytraining,anddevelopingpositivestudent‐teacherrelationships

willhelpeducatorstopromoteacivilityculturethatisinclusive,supportive,and

democraticforalllearners.


23

References

Andrews,J.L.&Misawa,M.(2017).Subtlebias:Exploringthecharacteristicsof

microaggressionsinadultandhighereducation.InM.Misawa(Ed.).Justiceforall:

Practicinganti‐bullyingandanti‐violenceeducationtocreatecivilenvironmentsfor

adultlearners.ProceedingsoftheSecondBullying,Incivility,andViolenceinAdult,

Higher,Continuing,andProfessionalEducationPre‐Conference(pp.28‐36).

Norman,OK.[Paperversion]

Bambaeeroo,F.,&Shokrpour,N.(2017).Theimpactoftheteachers’non‐verbal

communicationonsuccessinteaching.JournalofAdvancesinMedicalEducation&

Professionalism,5(2),51–59.

Bandura,A.(1977).Sociallearningtheory.EnglewoodCliffs,NJ:PrenticeHall.

Baron,R.A.(2009).Socialperception.SocialPsychology,12,79‐109.

Baumeister,R.F.,&Leary,M.R.(1995).Theneedtobelong:Desireforinterpersonal

attachmentsasafundamentalhumanmotivation.PsychologicalBulletin,117,497‐

529

Beagan,B.(2001).MicroInequitiesandeverydayinequities:“Race,”gender,sexuality,and

classinmedicalschool.CanadianJournalofSociology,26(4),583‐610.doi:

10.2307/3341493

Beck,C.,&Kosnik,C.(2006).Innovationsinteacher’seducation:Asocialconstructivists

approach.Albany,NY:StateUniversityofNewYorkPress.

Biggs,J.(2001).Enhancinglearning:Amatterofstyleorapproach?InR.J.Sternberg&L.

Zhang(Eds.),Perspectivesonthinking,learning,andcognitivestyles(pp.73–102).

Mahway,NJ:Erlbaum.


24

Bogdan,R.C.,&Biklen,S.K.(2012).Qualitativeresearchforeducation:Anintroductionto

theoriesandmethods(4thed.).NewYork,NY:PearsonEducation

Brennan,S.(2016).Themoralstatusofmicro‐inequities:Infavorofinstitutionsolutions.In

M.Brownstein&J.Saul(Eds.).Implicitbiasandphilosophy:MoralResponsibility,

injustice,andethics(pp.235‐253).(Vol.2).NewYork,NY:OxfordUniversityPress.

Brown,M.M.,&Starrett,T.(2017,April7).Fosteringstudentconnectedness:Building

relationshipsintheclassroom.Retrievedfrom

https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching‐and‐learning/fostering‐student‐

connectedness‐building‐relationships‐classroom/

Bruner,J.(1986).Actualminds,possibleworlds.Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress.

Burr,V.(2015).Socialconstructionism.NewYork:NY:Routledge.

Chenail,R.J.(2010).Gettingspecificaboutqualitativeresearchgeneralizability.Journalof

Ethnographic&QualitativeResearch,5(1),1‐11.

Chun,E.,&Evans,A.(2015).Diverseadministratorsinperil:Thenewindenturedclassin

highereducation.NewYork,NY:Routledge.

Churches,R.(2010).Effectiveclassroomcommunicationpocketbook.Alresford,UK:

Teachers’Pocketbooks.

Cranston,P.(1989).Sexdifferencesinundergraduates'experiencesofcampusmicro‐

inequities.JournalofCollegeStudentDevelopment,30(4),313‐318.

Cranston,P.,&Leonard,M.M.(1990).Therelationshipbetweenundergraduates'

experiencesofcampusmicro‐inequitiesandtheirself‐esteemand

aspirations.JournalofCollegeStudentDevelopment,31(5),395‐401.


25

DeLamater,J.D.&Myers,D.J.(2011).Symboliccommunicationandlanguage.Social

Psychology,7,166‐196.

DeLotell,P.J.,Millam,L.A.,&Reinhardt,M.M.(2010).Theuseofdeeplearningstrategiesin

onlinebusinesscoursestoimpactstudentretention.AmericanJournalofBusiness

Education,3(12),49‐56.Retrievedfrom

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1058303.pdf

Dewey,J.(1916).Democracyandeducation.NewYork,NY:FreePress.

Edwards,R.,&HollandJ.(2013).Whatisqualitativeinterviewing?NewYork,NY:

Bloombury.

Everaert,P.,Opdecam,E.,Maussen,S.(2017).Therelationshipbetweenmotivation,

learningapproaches,academicperformanceandtimespent.AccountingEducation,

26(1),78‐107.doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1274911

Forgas,J.P.(2000).Feelingandthinking:Theroleofaffectinsocialcognition.Cambridge:

CambridgeUniversityPress.

Freedman,S.,&Vreven,D.(2016).Workplaceincivilityandbullyinginthelibrary:

Perceptionorreality?.College&ResearchLibraries,77(6),727‐748.

doi:10.5860/crl.77.6.727

Freeman,T.M.,Anderman,L.H.,&Jensen,J.M.(2010).Senseofbelongingincollege

freshmenattheclassroomandcampuslevels.TheJournalofExperimental

Education,75(3),203‐220.doi:10.3200/JEXE.75.3.203‐220


26

Garrison,D.R.&Cleveland‐Innes,M.(2005).Facilitatingcognitivepresenceinonline

learning:Interactionisnotenough.TheAmericanJournalofDistanceEducation,

19(3),133–148

Guest,G.,MacQueen,K.M.,&Namey,E.E.(2012).Appliedthematicanalysis.Thousand

Oaks,CA:SAGEPublication,Inc.

Guba,E.G.,&Lincoln,Y.S.(1994).Competingparadigmsinqualitativeresearch.InN.K.

Denzin&Y.S.Lincoln(Eds.),Handbookofqualitativeresearch(pp.105‐117).

ThousandOaks,CA:SAGEPublications,Inc.

Hall,R.M.,&Sandler,B.R.(1982).Theclassroomclimate:Achillyoneforwomen.

Washington,DC:AssociationofAmericanColleges.Retrieved

fromhttps://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED215628

Hoffman,E.(2014).Facultyandstudentrelationships:Contextmatters.CollegeTeaching,

62(1),13‐19.doi:10.1080/87567555.2013.817379

hook,b.(2003).Teachingcommunity:Apedagogyofhope.NewYork,NY:Routledge.

Howie,P.,Bagnall,R.(2013).Acritiqueofthedeepandsurfaceapproachestolearning

model.TeachinginHigherEducation,18(4),389‐400.

Huba,J.&Kronbergs,S.S.(2016).Fiercelyyou:Befabulousandconfidentbythinkinglikea

dragqueen.Oakland,CA:Berrett‐KoehlerPublishers,Inc.

Hutchinson,K.,&Jenkins,F.(2013).Womeninphilosophy:Whatneedstochange.NewYork,

NY:OxfordUniversityPress.


27

Illeris,K.(2002).Thethreedimensionsoflearning:Contemporarylearningtheoryinthe

tensionfieldbetweenthecognitive,theemotional,andthesocial.Malabar,FL:Krieger

PublishingCompany.

Illeris,K(2017).Howwelearn:Learningandnon‐learninginschoolandbeyond.NewYork,

NY:Routledge.

Jonassen,D.H.,Myers,J.M.,McKillop,A.M.(1996).Fromconstructivismto

constructionism:Learningwithhypermedia/multimediaratherthanfromit.InB.G.

Wilson(Ed.),Constructivistlearningenvironments:Casestudiesinstructionaldesigns

(pp.93‐106).EnglewoodCliffs,NJ:EducationalTechnology.

Kahu,E.R.,&Nelson,K.(2018).Studentengagementintheeducationalinterface:

Understandingthemechanismsofstudentsuccess.JournalofHigherEducation

Research&Development,37(1),58‐71.doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197

Kahu,E.R.(2013).Framingstudentengagementinhighereducation.StudiesinHigher

Education,38(5),758‐773.doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505

Kiraly,D.(2014).Asocialconstructivistapproachtotranslatoreducation:Empowerment

fromtheorytopractice.NewYork,NY:Routledge.

Knapps,M.L.,Hall,J.A.,&Horgan,T.E.(2014).Nonverbalcommunicationinhuman

interaction(8thed.).Boston,MA:Wadsworth,CengageLearning.

Kuh,G.D.(2009).Thenationalsurveyofstudentengagement:Conceptualandempirical

foundations.NewDirectionsforInstitutionalResearch,141,5‐20.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ir.283


28

Lincoln,M.(2002).Conflictresolutioncommunication:Patternspromotingpeacefulschools.

Lanham,MD:Rowman&Littlefield.

Lucas,U.(2001).Deepandsurfaceapproachestolearningwithinintroductoryaccounting:

Aphenomenographicstudy.AccountingEducation,10(2),161‐184.

doi:10.1080/09639280110073443

Maslow,A.H.(1943).Atheoryofhumanmotivation.PsychologicalReview,50(4),370‐396.

McCroskey,J.C.,Richmond,V.P.,&Bennett,V.E.(2006).Therelationshipsofstudentend‐

of‐classmotivationwithteachercommunicationbehaviorsandinstructional

outcomes.CommunicationEducation,55(4),403‐414,doi:

10.1080/03634520600702562

Meadors,J.D.,&Murray,C.B.(2014).Measuringnonverbalbiasthroughbodylanguage

responsestostereotypes.JournalofNonverbalBehavior,38(2),209‐229.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10919‐013‐0172‐y

Mehrabian,A.(1968).Communicationwithoutwords.PsychologyToday,2(9),52‐55.

Morreale,S.P.,Spitzberg,B.H.,Barge,J.K.(2007).Humancommunication:Motivation,

knowledge,andskills.(2nded.).Belmont,CA:ThomsonHigherEducation.

Morrissette,P.(2001).Reducingincivilityintheuniversity/collegeclassroom.IEJLL:

InternationalElectronicJournalforLeadershipinLearning,5(4).Retrievedfrom

http://iejll.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/iejll/index.php/ijll/article/view/497/159

Nadal,K.L.(2017).TheSAGEencyclopediaofpsychologyandgender.ThousandOaks,CA:

SAGEPublications,Inc.


29

NationalSurveyofStudentEngagement(2017).Inclusiveclassroompracticeslinkedto

higher‐orderlearningandgreatergainsduringcollege,surveyfinds.Retrievedfrom

http://nsse.indiana.edu/NSSE_2017_Results/pdf/Press_Release%E2%80%8C.pdf

Niemiec,C.P.,&Ryan,R.M.(2009).Autonomy,competence,andrelatednessinthe

classroom:Applyingself‐determinationtheorytoeducationalpractice.SchoolField,

7(2),133‐144.doi:10.177/1477878509104318

Okon,J.J.(2011).Roleofnon‐verbalcommunicationineducation.MediterraneanJournalof

SocialSciences,2(5),35‐40.

Piaget,J.(2013).Theconstructionofrealityinthechild(Vol.82).NewYork,NY:Routledge.

Reio,T.G.,Jr.,&Ghosh,R.(2009).Antecedentsandoutcomesofworkplaceincivility:

Implicationsforhumanresourcedevelopment.HumanResourceDevelopment

Quarterly,20,237‐264.

Rossman,G.B.,&Rallis,S.F.(2016).Anintroductiontoqualitativeresearch:Learninginthe

field(4thed.).ThousandOaks,CA:SAGEPublications,Inc.

Rowan,L.,&Grootenboer,P.(2017).Studentengagementandrapportinhighereducation:

Thecaseforrelationship‐centeredpedagogies.Switzerland:PalgraveMacmillan.

Rowe,M.P.(2008).Micro‐affirmations&micro‐inequities.JournaloftheInternational

OmbudsmanAssociation,1(1),45‐48.

Saeed,S.,&Zyngier,D.(2012).Howmotivationinfluencesstudentengagement:A

qualitativecasestudy.JournalofEducationandLearning,1(2),252‐267


30

Sandler,B.R.,&Hall,R.M.(1986).Thecampusclimaterevisited:Chillyforwomenfaculty,

administrators,andgraduatestudents.Washington,D.C.AssociationofAmerican

Colleges,ProjectontheStatusandEducationofWomen.

Saporu,D.F.,&Herbers,J.M.(2014).What’sinatitle?:Gendermicro‐inequitiesina

universityhumanresourcesdatabase.NASPAJournalAboutWomeninHigher

Education,8(3),101‐116.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19407882.2014.987088

Scarlett,W.G.(Ed.).(2015).TheSAGEencyclopediaofclassroommanagement.Thousand

Oaks,CA:SAGEPublications,Inc.

Schnellmann,J.&Gibbons,J.L.,(1984).Micro‐inequitiesintheclassroom:Theperception

byminoritiesandwomenofalessfavorableclimateintheclassroom.Proceedingsof

theAnnualConventionoftheAmericanPsychologicalAssociation,1‐27.Retrieved

fromhttp://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED251769.pdf

Spradley,J.P.(2016).Participantobservation.Belmont,CA:Wadsworth,CengageLearning.

Stake,R.E.(2005).Qualitativecasestudies.InN.K.Denzin&Y.S.Lincoln(Eds.),The

Sagehandbookofqualitativeresearch(pp.443‐466).ThousandOaks,CA:Sage

PublicationsLtd.

Strayhorn,T.L.(2012).Collegestudents’senseofbelonging:Akeytoeducationalsuccessfor

allstudents.NewYork,NY:Routledge

Sue,D.W.,Capodilupo,C.M.,Torino,G.C.,Bucceri,J.M.,Holder,A.M.B.,Nadal,K.L.,&

Esquilin,M.(2007).Racialmicroaggressionsineverydaylife:Implicationsfor

clinicalpractice.AmericanPsychologist,62(4),271‐286.Retrievedfrom


31

http://world‐trust.org/wp‐content/uploads/2011/05/7‐Racial‐Microagressions‐

in‐Everyday‐Life.pdf

Sue,D.W.(2010).Microaggressionsineverydaylife:Race,gender,andsexualorientation.

Hoboken,NJ:JohnWiley&Son,Inc.

Young,S.(2006).Micromessaging:Whyleadershipisgreatbeyondwords.NewYork,NY:

McGrawHillEducation.

Vygotsky,L.S.(2012).Thoughtandlanguage(Reviseded.).Cambridge,MA:TheMITPress.

Wentzel,K.R.,&Ramani,G.B.(2016).Handbookofsocialinfluencesinschoolcontexts:

social‐emotional,motivation,andcognitiveoutcomes.NewYork,NY:Routledge.

Williams,J.D.,Woodson,A.N.,&Wallace,T.L.(2016).“CanwesaytheN‐word?”:Exploring

psychologicalsafetyduringracetalk.ResearchinHumanDevelopment,13,15‐31.

doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2016.1141279

Wright,M.,&Hill,L.H.(2015).Academicincivilityamonghealthsciencesfaculty.Adult

Learning26(1),14‐20.doi:10.1177/1045159514558410

Wubbels,T.,Brekelmans,M.,denBrok,P.,Wijsman,L.,Mainhard,T.,&anTartwijk,J.

(2014).Teacher‐studentrelationshipsandclassroommanagement.InE.T.Emmer,

E.Sabornie,C.Evertson,&C.Weinstein(Eds.).Handbookofclassroommanagement:

Research,practice,andcontemporaryissues(2nded.,pp.363–386).NewYork,NY:

Routledge.

Download - THROWING SHADE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF …Journal of Student Success and Retention Vol. 5, No. 1, October 2018 4 influence learning engagement. Two overarching research questions guided

Top Related