The Services Research Company
Pareekh JainSenior Research Vice [email protected]
HfS Blueprint Report
Aerospace Engineering ServicesExcerpt for QuEST GlobalDecember 2017
Tanmoy MondalSenior Research [email protected]
©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global Proprietary│Page1
TOPIC PAGE
ExecutiveSummary 2
Research Methodology 8
KeyMarketDynamics 13
MarketDataAnalysis 17
ServiceProviderGrid 28
ServiceProviderProfiles 32
Market Wrap-UpandRecommendations 34
About theAuthors 43
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Proprietary│Page3©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Introduction to the HfS Blueprint Report: Aerospace Engineering Services
n The Aerospace Engineering Services HfS Blueprint Report is the first application of the HfSBlueprint methodology to the aerospace and defense engineering services marketplace.
n The Aerospace Engineering Services HfS Blueprint Report reviews the aerospace and defenseengineering services market across the value chain for new product development, productsustenance, manufacturing support, testing and certifications, MRO/aftermarket services, andsoftware implementation services.
n The HfS Aerospace Engineering Services Blueprint includes profiles and assessments of 20service providers of aerospace engineering services.
n Unlike other quadrants and matrices, the HfS Blueprint identifies relevant differentials betweenservice providers across a number of facets in two main categories: innovation and execution.
n For this report, HfS has increased the attention paid to innovation criteria in particular, andadopted the new 2017 Blueprint Grid layout to assess service providers. This Grid nowrecognizes up-and-coming service providers (High Potentials) that score higher on innovationcriteria than on execution criteria as the providers build these practices. This is in addition to theexisting rankings for highest overall performance (Winner’s Circle) and strong combinedinnovation and execution performance (High Performers).
Proprietary│Page4©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
HfS Engineering Services Coverage
Comprehensiveandunvarnishedcoverageoftherapidlyevolvingengineeringservicesthatallows
clientstotakesmartdecisions
Repositoryof50+researchreportsincludingBlueprints,PoVs,andMarketAnalysesCoverageacross200+engineeringservicesproviders
Databaseof2000+engineeringengagementsandexpandingResearchmethodologydrivenbytalesfromthetrenches
Experiencedteamofpractitioneranalysts
MechanicalEngineering
Embedded&SemiconductorEngineering
SoftwareProductEngineering
ProductLifecycleManagementServices
Industry4.0/SmartManufacturingServices
ServiceLine
s
IndustryVerticals
Telecom
Med
icalDevices
Automotive
Aerospace
©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global Proprietary│Page5
HfS Definition: Aerospace Engineering Services Value Chain and Aero Segments
Source:HfSResearch,2017
NewProductDevelopment
• Design• Analysis• Development
ProductSustenance
• ValueEngineering
• Variants&Customization
• Sustenance
ManufacturingSupport
• SupplierQualification/PartsTransfer
• ToolDesign• PrototypeSupport
• ShopfloorServices
Testing&Certifications
•Testing•Certifications
MRO/After-MarketServices
•Diagnosis&TroubleShooting•RepairEngineering•TechnicalPublication•TechnicalSupport•HealthMonitoring
SoftwareImplementation
•PLMImplementation&Support•MESImplementation&Support
Aerostructures
• Fuselage• Wings• Empennage• Doors• SecondaryStructures
Aeroengine
• ColdEnd• HotEnd• Accessories
Aerosystems
• Wheels&BrakingSystems
• Pumps&Valves• PowerDistribution
• Hydraulics• SensingSystems
ValueChain
AerospaceSegments
Avionics
• ElectricalSystems
• CommunicationSystems
• NavigationSystems
• Cockpit• FlightControlSystems
Interiors
• Cabin• Interior• Seats• Monuments• In-flightEntertainment
• CabinElectronics• LightingSystem
Proprietary│Page6©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Key Highlights: State of the Aerospace EngineeringServices Marketn Interesting time for the aerospace industry: The major civil aircraft development programs are
coming to an end and the focus is shifting on avionics, in-flight entertainment, manufacturing, andMRO segments. The defense sector is picking up fast with major demand coming from developingcountries such as India, the Middle East, and so on. The 10 key trends driving the aerospaceengineering services market are as follows:
1. Emerging need for end-to-end services and solutions portfolio
2. Advanced defense engineering capability
3. Focus on manufacturing engineering, value engineering
4. Capability development for digital technologies
5. Expertise in design and testing capabilities
6. Investment in emerging areas such as electric aircrafts, advanced communication systems,etc.
7. Strong partnership ecosystem
8. Defense compliance management and certifications
9. Strategic collaboration with clients
10. Growth in the APAC region
Proprietary│Page7©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Key Highlights: State of the Aerospace EngineeringServices Marketn Different aerospace engineering approaches by service providers: The 20 service providers we
evaluated for this Blueprint approach this market in three ways: (1) Service providers with strongdefense expertise focus more on certifications, UAV, and warfare systems. (2) Service providerswith strong IT offerings focus more on integrating digital offerings with aerospace engineering inthe areas of IoT, AI, 3D printing, etc. (3) The pure-play engineering service providers focus onsolutions across segments such as aeroengine, aerosystems, interiors, and others. (4) A few largeservice providers are focusing on all segments and can offer end-to-end services across valuechain, including PLM and MRO.
n Increasing digitization in aerospace engineering: New technology areas such as AR/VR, IoT, AI,and 3D printing are influencing different areas of aerospace engineering, including avionics,aftermarket services for better monitoring, efficiency, and safety.
n Challenges in aerospace engineering services: Some of the challenges in aerospace engineeringservices are the following:
n Vision and investment for solution and IP development
n Specialized resource capabilities in the areas of defense, avionics
n Onshore resource deployment for government regulations and compliances
Research Methodology
Proprietary│Page9©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Blueprint Research MethodologyDataSummaryn DatawascollectedinQ32017andQ42017,coveringbuyers,providers, and
advisors/influencersofaerospaceengineeringservices.n Morethan800datapointswerecollected,covering20majorservice
providers.n Revenuedistributionofindustry,valuechain,andsolutionsisestimatedby
HfS.
ParticipatingServiceProviders
ThisReportIsBasedOn:
n TalesfromtheTrenches:Interviewswereconductedwithbuyerswhohaveevaluatedserviceprovidersandexperiencedtheservices.Somecontactsweresuppliedbyserviceproviders,butmanyinterviewswereconductedbyleveragingHfS’extensivenetwork.
n Sell-SideExecutiveBriefings:Structureddiscussionswithserviceproviderstoevaluateinnovation,execution,marketshare,anddealcounts.
n PubliclyAvailableInformation:Evaluationsalsoincludefinancialdata,websiteinformation,andpresentationsgivenbyseniorexecutives,aswellasothermarketingcollateral.
Proprietary│Page10©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
HfS Aerospace Engineering Services Blueprint Scoring Percentage Breakdown
EXECUTION 100%QualityofCustomersandCustomerRelationships 20%SolutionandDeliveryCapabilities 40%GeographicSpreadandScale 15%ApplicabilitytoDifferent Segments 25%
INNOVATION 100%Strategy,Innovation,andInvestments 35%Technology,Tools,Patents,andIPBusiness 30%PricingandBusinessOutcomesMeasurement 20%EmergingAreas 15%
Proprietary│Page11©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Execution Criteria Definitions
EXECUTIONHowwelldoestheserviceproviderexecuteonitscontractualagreement, andhowwelldoestheprovidermanagetheclient-providerrelationship?
QualityofCustomersandCustomerRelationships
Howengagedis theexecutiveandmanagementteamindefiningandmanagingthedeliveryofbusinessservices?Whatisthescaleofclientengagements?What isthequalityofserviceproviders’clients?Howmanyofthetop100aerospaceanddefensecompaniesareconvincedoftheserviceproviders’capabilities?Howstrongarecustomerrelationships?
SolutionandDeliveryCapabilities
Whatarethe clients’andthemarket’soverallimpressionofthequalityofserviceacrossthevaluechainfromthisserviceprovider?Howdeep istheaerospaceengineeringdomainexpertise(talentandsolutions)inunderstandingandthenaddressingissues?Isthedeliverycapabilitywidespreadacrossthevaluechain?Howaredeliverycapabilitiesdevelopedandnurtured?
Geographic SpreadandScale Howdoesthisserviceprovideruseaglobaldeliveryfootprinttomeetclients’needs?Doserviceprovidershavethescaletomakeinvestmentsindelivery?
ApplicabilitytoDifferent SegmentsHowdeep istheexpertiseindeliveringsolutionsacrossaerospacesegments,suchasaerostructures,aeroengine,aerosystems,avionics,andinteriors?Howdotheirsegmentsmixcomparewiththatoftheindustry?
Proprietary│Page12©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Innovation Criteria Definitions
INNOVATIONHowwelldoestheserviceproviderinnovateitsoffering(s)inresponsetomarketdemand,clientrequirements, anditsownvisionforhowtheaerospaceengineeringservicesmarketwillevolve?
Strategy,Innovation,andInvestments
Whatistheserviceprovider’svision fortheevolutionofaerospaceengineeringservices?Isthereaclearstrategyfordeliveringaerospaceengineeringservices,andarethereidentifiableinvestmentsinplacetorealizethisstrategytoday?Docustomersratetheservicesasinnovative?Arethereexamplesofinnovationinengagementssharedbycustomersandserviceproviders?Howareserviceprovidersleveragingtheexternalecosystem?Areserviceprovidersleveragingthoughtleadershiptoeducateandinfluencecustomersandstakeholders?
Technology,Tools,Patents,andIPBusiness
Whatistheroleof toolsandplatformsintheserviceprovider’sofferingstrategy?Aretheselectedplatformsdevelopedin-house,oraretheyprovidedbythirdparties?Isthereademonstrableintenttomaintainandenhancethein-houseplatforms?WhatistheroleofpatentsandIPsolutionsintheserviceprovider’sofferings?
Pricingand BusinessOutcomesMeasurement
Doesthe providerhaveaclearunderstandingofwhatbusinessoutcomesexistforaerospacecustomersandhowwilltheserviceproviderdeliverthesebusinessoutcomes usingcollaborativeengagements?Howflexibleandcompetitiveistheserviceproviderwhendeterminingthepricingofcontracts?Howdoes theserviceprovider’s pricingmixcomparewiththatoftheindustry?
EmergingAreas(AI,IoT,3Dprinting,Composites,Drones,AR/VR,etc.)
Howis the serviceproviderlookingatemergingareas?Does ithave planstoleveragetheseemergingareasandintegratethemintoitssolutions?ExamplesincludeAI,IoT,3Dprinting,Composites,Drones,AR/VR.
Key Market Dynamics
Proprietary│Page14©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Key Trends Driving the Aerospace Engineering Services Market (1)n Emerging need for end-to-end services and solutions portfolio: Clients are increasingly looking for
a single aerospace engineering service provider for an end-to-end solutions portfolio. The scopeincludes design, testing, manufacturing, and customer services, including industry- and localgovernment-specific environmental, regulatory, and security challenges.
n Advanced defense engineering capability: The defense sector presents a lot of growthopportunities for the future. The advanced defense engineering capability in the areas of UAV,fighter aircrafts, helicopters, and missile systems acts as a differentiator in this space. Europeanengineering services providers lead this area with some prominent engagements with Dassault,Airbus, and other government programs. They are also building a pool of certified defenseengineers for more capability development.
n Focus on manufacturing engineering, value engineering, MRO: As the major civil aircraftprograms are entering into production, the next service offerings focus is on manufacturing andvalue engineering in the areas of additive manufacturing, product cost optimization, sustenanceengineering, etc. In the coming years, the global aircraft fleet size will be doubled.
n Expertise in design and testing capabilities: Aero OEMs and tier-1 enterprises are increasinglyasking for end-to-end aero systems and subsystems development capabilities that includeexpertise in design and testing (D0178, D0160). In many cases, service providers also manufacturecertain mechanical and embedded hardware components for clients.
Proprietary│Page15©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Key Trends Driving the Aerospace Engineering Services Market (2)n Capability development for digital technologies: Increasing digitization in aerospace engineering
in the areas of IoT, AI, 3D printing, and industry 4.0 is ensuring better control, efficiency, andsafety. The connected aerospace systems help in real-time monitoring and predictive analyticscapabilities in different aero segments including aero engines, aero structures, and so on, ensuringthe overall health prediction of an aircraft.
n Investment in emerging areas: Service providers are increasing their R&D spend in the next trendsof aerospace engineering such as electric aircrafts, advanced communication systems, fuelefficiency, and composite materials to increase safety and decrease the overall and operationalcosts. Aero OEMs and tier-1 enterprises are already working in this area and have startedoutsourcing these projects to reduce the project spend and overall risk.
n Strong partnership ecosystem: Aerospace engineering is now heavily influenced by digital andemerging technologies, so service providers need to leverage cross-domain knowledge and investsignificantly in IP and product innovation to deliver differentiated value to customers. Due to thenewness of the application of these technologies, service providers are entering into partnerships,joining industry consortia, and working with academia for different business cases.
Proprietary│Page16©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Key Trends Driving the Aerospace Engineering Services Market (3)n Defense compliance management and certifications: Defense engineering demands the fulfilment
of local government regulations such as ITAR Certification for US defense requirements andCEMILAC certified for India defense requirements. So, service providers are developing an offsetglobal strategy to meet the offset obligations in both civil and defense areas for their clients. Forexample, HCL has capability as per US defense requirements (ITAR Certification) through its Butleracquisition.
n Strategic collaboration with clients: Service providers are building strategic partnerships withaerospace OEMs and tier-1 enterprises by co-investing in next-generation technologies, newproducts, and services. This has paved the way for more “risk sharing models” with focus onoutcome-based pricing models.
n Growth in the APAC region: The demand for aerospace engineering services is increasing outsideNorth America and Europe, notably in the Asia-Pacific region due to increased application ofaftermarket and MRO services. As China and India are future aerospace growth markets, someservice providers have already started to prioritize an APAC strategy, and others have indicated astrategy to target the Asia-Pacific region in particular in the coming years.
Market Data Analysis
Proprietary│Page18©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Market Data Analysis* of Aerospace Engineering Services Across Eight Dimensions
Verticals
GeographyServicesOfferings
AerospaceEngineeringServices
DataAnalysis
ClientRelationships
WorkforceExperience
Training
* BasedonSample:ServiceProviders=11
PricingOnshorevs.Offshore
Proprietary│Page19©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Current Services Revenue Spread in Aerospace Engineering Services Across Value Chain
AEROSPACEENGINEERINGSERVICESREVENUEBYTYPEOFSERVICEACROSSVALUECHAIN
NewProductDevelopment
36%
ProductSustenance
18%Testing&Certifications
15%
ManufacturingSupport14%
PLM/PackageImplementation
9%
MRO/AftermarketServices
8%
NewProductDevelopment ProductSustenance
Testing&Certifications ManufacturingSupport
PLM/PackageImplementation MRO/AftermarketServices
AEROSPACEENGINEERING SERVICESSEGMENTATION
Newproductdevelopmentandproductsustenanceservicesaretheleadingservice,accountingformorethan50%ofrevenue,followedbytestingandcertificationsservices.
Accordingtoserviceproviders,theshareoftheMRO/aftermarketservices,manufacturingsupport,andtestingisincreasingintheaerospaceengineeringservicemix.
Source:HfSResearch,2017;Sample:ServiceProviders=11
Proprietary│Page20©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Current Services Revenue Spread in Aerospace Engineering Services Across Aero Segments
AEROSPACEENGINEERINGSERVICESREVENUEBYTYPEOFSERVICEACROSSAEROSEGMENTS
Aerostructures31%
Aerosystems21%
Aeroengines20%
Avionics19%
Interiors9%
Aerostructures Aerosystems Aeroengines Avionics Interiors
AEROSPACEENGINEERING SERVICESSEGMENTATION
Aerostructures andaerosystems aretheleadingaerosegmentsformorethan50%ofrevenue,followedbyaeroengines.
Accordingtoserviceproviders,theshareofavionics,interiors,andaero-enginesisincreasingintheaerospaceengineeringservicemix.
Source:HfSResearch,2017;Sample:ServiceProviders=11
Proprietary│Page21©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Current Vertical Segmentation in Aerospace Engineering Services
AEROSPACEENGINEERING SERVICESVERTICAL SEGMENTATION
Aerospaceengineeringservicesaresegmentedintothefollowing:
§ CivilAviation
§ Defense
Mostoftheaerospaceengineeringservicesrevenuecomesfromcivilaviation.ThedefensemarketisdominatedbylargeaerospaceOEMsandtheserviceprovidersareassociatedwithsomeofthedefenseprojectsoutsourcedbytheseOEMsandgovernmentprojects.
AEROSPACEENGINEERINGSERVICESREVENUEBREAKDOWNBYVERTICAL
Source:HfSResearch,2017;Sample:ServiceProviders=11
CivilAviation76%
Defense24%
CivilAviation Defense
Proprietary│Page22©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Current Geographic Spread in Aerospace Engineering Services
AEROSPACE ENGINEERINGSERVICESGEOGRAPHIC
SEGMENTATION
Europeisthelargestmarketforaerospaceengineeringservices,followedbyNorthAmerica.
Accordingtoserviceproviders,Asia-PacifichasmoregrowthpotentialnowbecauseoftheMROservices,aircraftmanufacturingbyChina(COMAC),andincreasedefensespending,amongotherreasons.
AEROSPACEENGINEERINGSERVICESREVENUEBREAKDOWNBYGEOGRAPHY
Europe50%NorthAmerica
47%
AsiaPacific&ROW3%
Europe NorthAmerica AsiaPacific&ROW
Source:HfSResearch,2017;Sample:ServiceProviders=11
Proprietary│Page23©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Current Pricing Models Deployed in Aerospace Engineering ServicesAEROSPACEENGINEERINGSERVICESREVENUEBREAKDOWNBYPRICINGMODELS
PRICINGFORAEROSPACEENGINEERINGSERVICES
Thepricinginaerospaceengineeringservicesispredominantlytimeandmaterial(T&M)andfixedprice.
HfS'discussionswithbuyersandserviceprovidersindicatedagrowingdemandformoreriskshare-basedpricingmodels.Time&Material
54%FixedPrice32%
IPLicensing&RoyaltyBased
1% Others13%
Time&Material FixedPrice IPLicensing&RoyaltyBased Others
Source:HfSResearch,2017;Sample:ServiceProviders=11
Proprietary│Page24©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Current Onshore/Nearshore/Offshore Split in Aerospace Engineering Services
GEOGRAPHICSPLITINAEROSPACEENGINEERING SERVICES
About94%oftheaerospaceengineeringservicesheadcountiseitheroffshoreoronshore.
Accordingtoserviceproviders,theonshoreandnearshoreheadcountsaregrowingfaster.Besidesdevelopedcountriesacrosstheglobe,India,China,andEasternEuropeancountriesarehotdestinationsforaerospaceengineeringservices.
Offshore48%
Onshore46%
Nearshore6%
Offshore Onshore Nearshore
AEROSPACEENGINEERINGSERVICESPRICINGBREAKDOWNBYDELIVERYLOCATION
Source:HfSResearch,2017;Sample:ServiceProviders=11
Proprietary│Page25©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Current Workforce Experience Split in Aerospace Engineering Services
WORKFORCEEXPERIENCESPLITINAEROSPACE ENGINEERINGSERVICES
Theworkforcemixisbalancedacrossdifferentexperiencedprofessionals.Overall,highexperiencedprofessionalsdominatetheaerospaceengineeringservicesspace.
Asaerospaceengineeringservicesdemandhigh-enddesign,development,testing,anddomainknowledge,theworkforcemixofprofessionalswith3-8 yearsandmorethan8yearsofexperiencewillincreaseinthefuture.
3-8years38%
<3years31%
>8years31%
3-8years <3years >8years
AEROSPACEENGINEERINGSERVICESWORKFORCEEXPERIENCEBREAKDOWN
Source:HfSResearch,2017;Sample:ServiceProviders=11
Proprietary│Page26©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Client Relationships: Percentage of Clients with $5M+ ACV
CLIENTS WITH$5MILLION+ACV
Onanaverage,25%ofaerospaceengineeringserviceproviderclientaccountshavemorethan$5millioninACV.
Thereisalargevariationamongserviceprovidersintheirpercentageofclientswith$5million+ACV.Itvariesbetween0%and80%.
<$5MillionACV75%
$5Million+ACV25%
<$5MillionACV $5Million+ACV
AEROSPACEENGINEERINGSERVICESCLIENTSBREAKDOWNBYACV
Source:HfSResearch,2017;Sample:ServiceProviders=11
Proprietary│Page27©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Investment in Training Hours/FTE
TRAININGHOURS/FTE
Aerospaceengineeringserviceprovidersspendabout60hours/FTE/yearonaerospaceengineeringrelatedtraining,onanaverage.Assuminganaverageof2000hours/year,thiswillbeabout3%ofworkhours.
WORKINGHOURS/FTEBREAKDOWN
Source:HfSResearch,2017;Sample:ServiceProviders=11
Others97%
TrainingHours3%
Others TrainingHours
Service Provider Grid
Proprietary│Page29©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Todistinguishserviceprovidersthatshowcompetitivedifferentiationacrossinnovationandexecution,HfSawardstheseprovidersthe“HfS Winner’sCircle”designation.
Guide to the Blueprint Grid
EXECUTION INNOVATION
HfS Winner’s Circleshowexcellencerecognizedbyclientsinthe8Idealsin executionandinnovation
Collaborativerelationshipswithclients,servicesexecutedwithacombinationoftalentandtechnology asappropriate,andflexiblearrangements.
Articulatevisionanda“newwayofthinking,”haverecognizableinvestmentsinfuturecapabilities and strongclientfeedback,and aredrivingnewinsights andmodels.
HighPerformersdemonstratestrongcapabilitiesbutlackaninnovativevisionormomentuminexecutingthevision
Executesomeofthefollowingareaswithexcellence:worthwhilerelationshipswithclients,servicesexecutedwith“greenlights,”andflexibilitywhenmeetingclients’needs.
Typically, describeavisionandplanstoinvestinfuturecapabilitiesandpartnershipsforAs-a-Service,andillustratean abilitytoleveragedigitaltechnologiesand/ordevelop newinsightswithclients.
High Potentialsdemonstratevisionandstrategybuthaveyettogainmomentuminexecuting them
Earlyresultsandproof pointsfromexamplesinnewserviceareasorinnovativeservicemodelsbutlackscale,broadimpact,andmomentuminthecapabilityunderreview.
Well-plotted strategyandthoughtleadership,showcaseduseofnewertechnologiesand/orroadmapandtalentdevelopmentplans.
ExecutionPowerhousesdemonstratesolid,reliableexecutionbuthaveyettoshowsignificantinnovationorvision
Evidence ofoperationalexcellence;however,stillmoreofadirectiveengagementbetweenaserviceprovideranditsclients.
Less evidentvisionandinvestmentinfuture-orientedcapability,suchasskillsdevelopment,“intelligentoperations,”ordigitaltechnologies.
Proprietary│Page30©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
HfS Blueprint Grid: Aerospace Engineering Services 2017
Cornerstone
SAPSuccessFactors
Infor
UltimateSoftware
KronosRamco
WorkdayOracleUnit4
INNOVA
TION
EXECUTION
ExcellentatInnovationandExecutionInvestinginInnovationtoChange
BuildingAllCapabilities ExecutionIsAheadofInnovation
HfS WINNER’SCIRCLE
EXECUTIONPOWERHOUSES
HIGHPOTENTIALS
HIGHPERFORMERS
Capgemini
Cyient Altran
TataElxsi
AXISCADES
P3
eInfochips
HCL
Genpact
QuESTGlobal
Alten
Assystem
TechMahindra
Infosys
TataTechnologies
LTTS
Wipro
TCS
AKKABelcan
ExcerptforQuEST Global
Proprietary│Page31©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Major Service Provider Dynamics: Highlights
EXECUTION
• Capgemini Has Strong Specific Capabilities and ExpertiseAcross Value Chain and Segments: Capgemini has abalanced solutions mix with good capabilities across all aerosegments and the value chain.
• Infosys Has a Highly Educated Workforce: Infosys has one ofthe highest percentages of 8+ years experience in itsworkforce among the service providers evaluated for thisBlueprint.
• Wipro Has a Strong India Offset Strategy: Wipro leveragesits manufacturing entity, Wipro Infrastructure Engineering(part of Wipro Enterprises), to meet Indian defense offsetguidelines.
• Alten Leverages Its Airbus Relationship: Alten is a majordigital transformation partner of Airbus and involved in anumber of engagements in the areas of virtual realityplatform and 3D printing.
• AKKA Thrives on Defense Expertise: AKKA has strongexpertise in defense engineering and has been involved in anumber of fighter aircrafts, helicopters, and missile systemsengagements.
• TCS Invests in Developing Workforce Capability: TCS hasone of the highest rates of training hours per FTE among theservice providers evaluated for this Blueprint.
• Assystem Has a High Onshore Presence: Assystem has ahigh onshore presence in both North America and Europe.
INNOVATION
• Cyient Leads in Patents and Innovation Credentials: Cyient hasstrong innovation credentials in the aerospace engineeringspace. It has one of the highest number of patents among theservice providers evaluated for this Blueprint.
• Altran Leverages Acquisitions and Partnerships: Altran hasacquired ten companies in the past six years, and theseacquisitions augment Altran’s capabilities across the valuechain, segments, and geographies. Altran also has partnershipswith 30+ entities which have created a robust ecosystem.
• HCL Offers Nonlinear Pricing Models: HCL uses risk sharing tojump start clients' development activity on a long-term basis,building a perpetual business model.
• QuEST has Strong Expertise in Aero Engine Segment: QuESThas strong expertise in both aero engine products as well asservices. It is working very closely with the top four aero enginemanufacturers for a long period.
• Tech Mahindra Leverages Digital Expertise: Tech Mahindra isinvesting heavily in next-generation digital technologies,including factory of future lab, analytics, health monitoring,mobility, and automation.
• LTTS Offers Lab-As-A-Service: LTTS has a strong expertise indesigning aerospace automatic test equipment (ATE) andtesting certification capabilities. It offers “Lab-As-A-Service” foraerospace testing and certification activities.
Service Provider Profile
StrongCapabilities/MatureOffering—PresenceofOfferingsintheMajorityofSubcategories,>$25MillionRevenue
Developing Capabilities,$5‒25MillionRevenue
Yet toDeveloporMinimal<$5MillionRevenue
Proprietary│Page33©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
QuEST Global Anaerospaceengineeringserviceproviderinahigh-growthtrajectorywithaeroengine andaerostructures capability,strongdefensesectorpresence,andIndiaoffsetstrategyHfS Winner’s Circle
BlueprintLeadingHighlights
• ExpertiseinAeroengine andAerostructures
• CapabilityinDefenseSector• PresenceinIndia• AccountManagement• Delivery–HighOnshorePresence
RelevantAcquisitions/Partnerships KeyClients GlobalOperationsCenters Proprietary Technologies/Platforms
Acquisitions:• GKNAES(2012)
Partnerships:• Siemens,GE,aPriori
Top100Aerospace&DefenseCompaniesasClients:12
Clients: 10+clientsincluding:• Airbus• Honeywell• Pratt&Whitney• Rolls-Royce• UTCAerospace
AerospaceengineeringservicesHeadcount(In-Scope):3,000– 4,000estimatedbyHfS
Locations: 20+majoraerospaceengineeringservicesdeliverycenterlocationsincluding:
• NorthAmerica:US• Europe:Germany,Spain,UK• APAC:India,Singapore
TotalPatents(Filed+Granted): <10
KeyIPSolution• EaglePlatform:Condition-basedmonitoringandvisualization
• EmbeddedSoftwareProductforAcceleratedTesting:Softwaretooltomonitorandcontrolsystemstatus
• CIVIM:Frameworkforcontinuousintegration,virtualization, andtestautomation
Strengths Challenges
• ExpertiseinAeroengineandAerostructuresSegments:QuESThasstrongexpertiseindifferentcomponentsofaeroengineincludingcompressor,externalandcontrol,combustor,andturbine.Itisworkingverycloselywiththetopfouraeroenginecompaniesforalongperiodoftime.Inaerostructures,ithascapabilityinnacelles,pylons,andwingsamongothers.
• StrongPresenceinDefenseSector:QuESThasahighpercentageofrevenuemixfromthedefensesector.ItworkswiththetopfivedefenseOEMsacrossdifferentsegments,includingaeroengineandavionics.
• IndiaOffsetStrategy:QuESThasestablishedQuESTGlobalDefence,asubsidyofQuESTGlobal,toaddresstheneedofmajorOEMstohaveakeystrategicpartnerbasedinIndiaformajordefenseprograms.Itexpectsmorethan80%ofQuESTGlobalDefenceEngineeringServicesbusinesstocomefromoffsets.
• AccountManagement:QuESThasstrongaccountmanagementcapabilitiesinthismarket.ItsaverageFTE/clientratioisonthehighersiderelativetoitscompetitors,whichreflectspositivelyonthedepthandbreadthofitsengagements.
• GeographicDeliveryMix:QuESThasastronggeographicspreadwith20+aerospaceengineeringdeliverycenterscoveringallmajorregions,includingNorthAmerica,Europe,andAsia-Pacific.Inaddition,ithasoneofthehighestpercentagesofresourcesinonshoreandnearshorelocations.
• FastGrowth:QuESThasachievedoneofthefastestgrowthratesinthelastfewyearsontherevenuefrontamongtheserviceprovidersincludedinthisBlueprint.ThisgrowthcanbeattributedtoitsacquisitionofGKNAES.
• IncreasingShareofPLMSegment:QuEST'sservicesrevenueisdominatedbymechanicalengineeringwithlittlepresenceinPLMandMESimplementation.ItneedstofocusonthissegmentasthesignificanceofPLMisincreasingduetoconnectedsystems.
• Digital:QuESTisdevelopingcapabilitiesindigitaltechnologyareassuchasIoT,AI,3Dprinting,andcompositesinaerospaceengineering.Ithastheopportunitytoscaleupfasterinthisspace.
• FindingNewClients:QuEST’srevenuemixisNorthAmerica- andEurope-centric,whichithastheopportunitytodiversify.QuESTneedstolookintoopportunitiesinotherAPACcountriesandregionsoutsideIndia.Also,itscustomerportfolioistiltedtowardslargeclients(greaterthan$10Brevenue),soitcanalsotargetaerospaceanddefensetier-1ortier-2playersthathaveyearlyrevenuebelow$10B.
• Patents:QuESThasfiledveryfewpatents(lessthan10)whichismuchlowerthantheindustryaverage.IndiscussionswithQuEST,werealizedthatitisnowfocusingondevelopingIPsintheaerospaceengineeringspace.
Industry
Aerospace
Defense
ValueChain
NPD
Sustenance
ManufacturingSupport
Testing&Certification
AMS/MRO
PLM/PackageImplementation
Solutions
Aerostructures
Aeroengine
Aerosystems
Avionics
Interiors
Market Wrap-Up and Recommendations
Proprietary│Page35©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Service Provider SelectionWhy this service provider? The top 10 reasons clients we spoke to selected their service providerare:
1. Broad portfolio of aerospace engineering service offerings across the value chain andsegments
2. Depth of skills and experience, including aerospace engineering, process, and certificationexpertise
3. Client management and delivery capability
4. Historical relationship
5. Investment for in-house lab and infrastructure
6. Recommendation from references and similar experience in the industry
7. Pricing flexibility and competitiveness
8. In-house tools, templates, and accelerators
9. Solution approach demonstrated during RFP process
10. Geographical reach
Proprietary│Page36©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
What Is Next in Aerospace Engineering (1)
n The engineering mix will change: All the major civil aerospace programs are coming to end inFY17, so the next phase of aerospace engineering will cater to aeroengines (more fuel efficient,clean fuel), avionics, interiors (in-flight entertainment), manufacturing, and MRO segmentsamong others. This is a shift from mechanical engineering to more software engineering, safety,and passenger experience areas. The big aerospace players have already started to embrace thisdigital disruption in their manufacturing landscape, extended supply chain, and otherstakeholders.
n Increasing digitization in aerospace engineering: Digital technologies are going beyond thetraditional aerospace engineering to manufacturing, maintenance, customer experience, andother areas due to influence of a number of digital tools such as AR/VR, analytics, AI, IoT, 3Dprinting, and industry 4.0 among others. The digitization is enabling better supply chainmanagement, interactive product design and training, and improved maintenance for aviationplayers.
n The geographic mix will change: At present, the aerospace engineering services outsourcingclient mix is dominated by the US and Europe. We believe that in the next few years, Asia-Pacificwill be the major growth drivers. In civil aerospace, Chinese player COMAC is a new entrant forboth short-medium and long range. Defense expansion programs in India, Saudi Arabia, and otherAPAC countries will create volume orders for defense manufacturers. In addition, low-cost APACcountries will be a hotbed for MRO hubs for civil aerospace companies.
We see the following as the major trends that will foster the future evolution of aerospaceengineering over the next two to three years:
Proprietary│Page37©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
What Is Next in Aerospace Engineering (2)n Investment in electric aircraft: The aviation industry is observing a huge momentum towards
electric aircrafts to reduce environmental pollution and bring about ease of transportation. Theelectrification will force a rethink of the entire design of an air vehicle. Major aircraftmanufacturers have started to explore this option. For example, Airbus, Rolls-Royce, andSiemens have collaborated to develop the technology needed to create electrically-poweredaircrafts. Zunum aero, a Seattle-based startup, is planning to build small hybrid-electric aircraftsby the early 2020s and has received funding from Boeing, JetBlue, and the state of Washington.
n Increase in mergers and acquisitions, major partnerships in aviation: Aerospace and defenseM&As and partnerships will increase and be targeted to get rapid access to niche and emergingtechnologies, entry to a particular product category, and geographic penetration amongothers. In 2017, we have observed two major M&As and partnerships in the aerospace sector:UTC acquired Rockwell Collin, and Airbus and Bombardier entered into a partnershipagreement for C-Series aircrafts. In the coming years, we are expecting more acquisitions in theareas of aerostructures, components, and consolidation among tier-1 aerospace players.
n Focus on MRO services: As most of the aircraft development programs are entering intoproduction, the next focus will be the maintenance of the fleet. With the advent of IoT,different aircraft data is captured over flight hours and it is analyzed for predictivemaintenance, enabling better maintenance and improved design over time. Boeing hasestablished a dedicated Global Services business that will focus on MRO services.
Proprietary│Page38©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
What Is Next in Aerospace Engineering (3)n Focus on UAV, urban mobility development programs: The aviation industry is observing a lot
of traction in UAV programs from both defense and commercial (construction inspectionincluding volumetric measurement, remote oil & gas field and pipeline monitoring, agriculturalfocus for crop monitoring) purposes. Major aircraft manufacturers are also focusing on urbanmobility programs that can be an alternate mode of transportation for future cities. Forexample, Boeing acquired Aurora Flight Sciences, an aviation and aeronautics researchcompany, which has partnered with Uber to develop a network of “flying taxis.” Airbus is alsoinvesting in short-range VTOL (vertical take-off and landing) urban air mobility demonstratorprojects like Vahana and CityAirbus.
n Pilotless Future: Big aviation players are exploring to combine sensor, AI, and othertechnologies to develop autonomous flight technology. Boeing has invested in autonomousflights and Airbus is also looking to build autonomous technology that will allow a single pilot tooperate commercial jetliners.
n Global Offset Strategy: Defense suppliers are rethinking their global offset strategy to fulfilllocal government regulations and compliances. They are increasingly entering into partnershipswith local certified players for contribution in non-core areas. For example, Tata AdvancedSystems and Lockheed Martin have signed an agreement to manufacture F-16 fighter jets inIndia. Saab has entered into a partnership with the Adani Group to grab a pie of India’s searchfor single-engine fighter jets.
Proprietary│Page39©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Recommendations: Enterprise Buyers (1)
n Select service providers based on the skills you need: Participants for this Blueprint were selectedbecause they are the leading or emerging service providers in their field of expertise. Everyaerospace engineering service provider covered is capable of meeting buyers’ broad needs,although capabilities differ significantly across the value chain and different aero segments.Therefore, buyers are advised to match carefully the service providers’ skills with their need andtake analysis to an appropriate level before shortlisting a service provider for an RFP.
n Leverage pricing models and contracts: Many service providers prefer to opt for a work packagepricing model assuming end-to-end delivery capability. With the advent of digital technologies,buyers are more interested in nonlinear pricing models, such as transaction-based or risk rewardpricing, like some of their peers to get the maximum out of service providers. Fixed price and timeand material (T&M) are already the most popular, and outcome-based models have startedshowing up more frequently in the service providers’ pricing mix as well. We recommend buyersengage with service providers for outcome-based pricing models for both cost reduction and risksharing perspectives. In this way, buyers can get the best out of their service providers.
n Trust service providers with more strategic work: Buyers need to think about long-term strategicengagements beyond cost and efficiency to engage with service providers. After discussions withbuyers, we also confirmed that they are interested to outsource strategic, higher-value services,including design and testing projects. This is often easily expressed but not as easily adopted byvarious stakeholders within client organizations. More trust and close working relationships areneeded to convert traditional relationships to strategic partnerships.
Proprietary│Page40©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Recommendations: Enterprise Buyers (2)
n Prepare for radical change: Aerospace engineering is going through a massive transformation withmore development programs in niche and emerging areas. The focus is on flying urbantransportation and electric aircrafts. These programs demand a new set of capabilities and we areobserving a number of small companies coming up in this space. Choose service providers that cansupport you to understand and embrace these radical changes besides co-working with internalR&D teams, finding a new balance, and interplaying between internal and external capabilities.
n Check the service provider's ability to support required locations:Most service providers claim tohave the ability to support clients across the globe. However, very few service providers have thetrue capability to have a balanced presence in North America, Europe, and the APAC regions. Aslocal government regulations and compliances are big challenges for aerospace engineering,access to local resources is of paramount importance. Also, in many cases, some of the outsourcingengineering works demand close proximity to the client location for close collaboration.
n Push the digital envelope: Digital transformation is an important aspect to improve quality andefficiency in many existing standardized processes. The adoption of digital technologies is unevenlydistributed in the industry, and most players have started to experiment. Make digitaltransformation a central anchor in aerospace engineering operations. Select service providers thatcan be long-term partners in this digital transformation journey to achieve overall businessobjectives in terms of cost savings, quality, and accuracy among others.
Proprietary│Page41©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Recommendations: Service Providers (1)n Long-term vision for aerospace engineering services: Aerospace engineering services need a long-
term strategy and planning for capability development. Some aerospace projects are stretched dueto stringent regulations, development guidelines, and testing procedures. Service providers needlong-term planning commitment followed by delivery alignment, research labs, investment funds,and other entities. As Digital and IoT are becoming mainstream, service providers need to leverageall their digital learnings in aerospace engineering.
n Continue to invest in talent management and retention: Access to good skills and retentionremain big challenges for aerospace engineering services. Service providers need to focus on hiringand retaining talent. There is also less scope for formal education in niche areas of advancedaerospace engineering, so service providers need to address this challenge by investing more ininternal training. Currently, they are establishing partnerships with leading aerospace educationalinstitutions for talent recruitment and training.
n Expanding presence in the APAC market: Service providers need to focus on the APAC market foraerospace engineering services growth. At present, most aerospace businesses come from NorthAmerica and Europe, but in the future, APAC will be a hub for aerospace engineering, particularlyMRO services. Service providers have already started to improve their geographical mix.
n Enhance partnership approach to address aerospace engineering white space: Service providershave partnerships with diverse technology companies for different aero segments offerings. Asdigital technologies are becoming prominent in the aerospace industry, service providers need toleverage their partnerships to work more closely to develop joint industry solutions, collaborativepricing models, and PoCs specific to client needs.
Proprietary│Page42©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Recommendations: Service Providers (2)n Drive more collaborative engagements: In our research, buyers described collaborative
engagements as one of the most important selection criteria for service providers that work onoutcome-based pricing model. To buyers, collaborative engagement means the service providersare willing to take risks and invest in the client's success. Service providers need to address newpricing models to clients, even if this deteriorates their revenue security in the short term. Thesenew commercial models also promote service providers’ flexibility and agility. In addition, weobserved initiatives for joint IP developments in some areas of aerospace engineering.
n Build scale and look at acquisitions: Scale is becoming a very crucial differentiator in theaerospace engineering services business as it can enable service providers to make the requiredinvestments in new technologies, design, domain, and local certification across a broader base.Our recommendation for service providers is to build scale fast, inorganically, or risk falling behindcompetitors who also see the strategic opportunity in this market. Niche aerospace engineeringservice providers in each geography could be good acquisition targets to get market and clientaccess.
n Investment in industry knowledge: Aerospace engineering services projects demand industry-specific business process knowledge and regulatory compliances awareness. Buyers expectthreshold industry knowledge from service providers. Service providers need to increase theirdomain knowledge to improve their customer experience. A few service providers we spoke to aremaking investments in this area at this time by developing internal training modules on specifictopics such as in-flight entertainment and UAVs.
About the Authors
Proprietary│Page44©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Pareekh JainSeniorVicePresidentandManagingDirector,Bangalore,India
Overview• Morethan15years’businessexperienceinbuyside,sourcingadvisory,servicedelivery,andindustryresearchintheglobaloutsourcingindustryacrosstheUS,Europe,andAsia
• CoverageareasinHfS areengineeringservicesandIndustry4.0• Engineeringservicescoverageisacrossfourhorizontals(mechanical,embedded,softwareproduct,andPLM)andfourverticals(automotive,aerospace,telecomandmedicaldevices)
• QuotedinleadingpublicationssuchasHarvardBusinessReview(HBR),TimesofIndia,EconomicTimes,BusinessStandard,NDTV,Hindu
• Won2016analystreportoftheyearforHfS EngineeringServicesTop20research(world’sfirstglobalrankingofengineeringserviceproviders)
PreviousExperience• BusinessPlanningManager(AsiaPacific),EmersonElectric,Malaysia• Manager,OutsourcingAdvisory,NeoGroup,India• SoftwareEngineer,GeometricPLM(AcquiredbyHCL),India• AuthorofthebookWhoIsThatLady?
Education• MBA,IndianInstituteOfManagement(IIM),Bangalore,India• B.Tech,IndianInstituteOfTechnology(IIT),Delhi,India
[email protected]@pareekhjain
Proprietary│Page45©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Tanmoy MondalSeniorResearchAnalyst,Bangalore,India
Overview• 6yearsofexperienceinresearch,advisory,anddeliveryintheglobalITServicesindustryacrosstheUS,Europe,andAsia-Pacific.
• ExperienceinVCandPEindustryinupcomingtechnologies,suchasrobotics,drones,virtualandaugmentedreality,etc.
• CoverageareasinHfSareblockchain,IoT,engineeringservices,andIndustry4.0
• Engineeringservicescoverageisacrossfourhorizontals(mechanical,embedded,softwareproduct,andPLM)andfourverticals(automotive,aerospace,telecomandmedicaldevices)
• Atechnologyenthusiastandresearcher
PreviousExperience• PracticeAreaLead(EmergingTechnologies),Tracxn• Manager,EnterpriseApplicationServices,HCLTech• SoftwareEngineer,TCS
Education• MBA,IndianInstituteofForeignTrade(IIFT),DelhiandKolkata,India• B.Tech,JadavpurUniversity(JU),Kolkata,India
[email protected]@17_mondal
Proprietary│Page46©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
Engineering Services Research Agenda 2018Timeline Horizon1:Actnow Horizon2:Watchout Horizon3:InvestigateQ12018 • AutomotiveEngineering(Blueprint)
• Q4Quarterlyengineeringservicestrends(PoV)
• BuyerVoiceonsupplierinnovationandexecutioncapabilitiesinautomotive(POV)
• AccessibilityEngineering(PoV)• AerospaceEngineeringRevenue
Benchmarking(PoV)• AerospaceStrategy&Differentiators
(PoV)
• AutonomousDrivingEngineeringProblems(PoV)
• DigitalThreadandPLM(PoV)• Software4.0andDigitalOne
Office(PoV)• AcceleratingIndustry4.0(PoV)
Q22018 • Q1Quarterlyengineeringservicestrends(PoV)
• SoftwareProductEngineering(Blueprint)• BuyerVoiceonsupplierinnovationand
executioncapabilitiesinsoftwareproductengineering(POV)
• EngineeringServicesMarketSize(PoV)
• AutomotiveEngineeringRevenueBenchmarking(PoV)
• AutomotiveEngineeringStrategy&Differentiators(PoV)
• HfS EngineeringServicesTop20(PoV)• EngineeringCaptiveInvestments(PoV)
• AutonomousDrivingSolutionCaseStudies(PoV)
• EmergingTechnologyTrendsinAerospace(PoV)
• R&DPatentLicensingPartnership(PoV)
Q32018 • Q2Quarterlyengineeringservicestrends(PoV)
• TelecomEngineering(Blueprint)• BuyerVoiceonsupplierinnovationand
executioncapabilitiesintelecom(POV)
• SoftwareProductEngineeringRevenueBenchmarking(PoV)
• SoftwareProductEngineeringStrategy&Differentiators(PoV)
• EngineeringServicesM&AInvestments
• SoftwareEngineeringIPPartnerships
• AutonomousDrivingStartupLandscape(PoV)
• EVCars(PoV)• ConnectedCars(PoV)• CollaborativeRobots(Cobots)
Trends(PoV)
Q42018 • MedicalDevicesEngineering(Blueprint)• Q3Quarterlyengineeringservicestrends
(PoV)• BuyerVoiceonsupplierinnovationand
executioncapabilitiesinmedicaldevices(POV)
• TelecomEngineeringRevenueBenchmarking(PoV)
• TelecomEngineeringStrategy&Differentiators(PoV)
• OEEtoCognitivePlantManagement(PoV)
• EmergingTechnologyTrendsinTelecom(PoV)
• 10IdealsofManagingR&DOrganization
• ConnectedIndustrialWorkers(PoV)
Proprietary│Page47©2017HfSResearchLtd.ExcerptforQuEST Global
The HfS Mission: Revolutionizing the IndustryHfS’missionistoprovidevisionaryinsightintothemajorinnovationsimpactingbusinessoperations:automation,artificialintelligence,blockchain,digitalbusinessmodels,andsmartanalytics.Wefocusonthefutureofoperationsacrosskeyindustries.Weinfluencethestrategiesofenterprisecustomerstodevelopoperationalbackbonestostaycompetitiveandpartnerwithcapableservicesproviders,technologysuppliers,andthird-partyadvisors.
HfSisthechangingfaceoftheanalystindustrycombiningknowledgewithimpact:
• ThinkTankmodeltocollaboratewithenterprisecustomersandotherindustrystakeholders• 3000enterprisecustomerinterviewsannuallyacrosstheGlobal2000• Ahighlyexperiencedanalystteam• Unrivaledindustrysummits• ComprehensivedataproductsonthefutureofoperationsandITservicesacrossindustries• Agrowingreadershipofmorethanonemillionannually.
TheAs-a-ServiceEconomy andOneOffice™ arerevolutionizingtheindustry.