Draft
The Effect of Metal Transfer Modes on Mechanical Properties of 3CR12 Stainless Steel
Journal: Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering
Manuscript ID TCSME-2018-0125.R1
Manuscript Type: Article
Date Submitted by the Author: 17-Jan-2019
Complete List of Authors: KAYMAKCI, ABDULLAH; University of Johannesburg, Mechanical Engineering ScienceMadyira, Daniel; University of Johannesburg, Mechanical Engineering ScienceNkwanyana, Ntokozo; University of Johannesburg, Mechanical Engineering Science
Keywords: Welding, Microstructure, Hardness, Tensile strength, Metal transfer mode
Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special
Issue? :Not applicable (regular submission)
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/tcsme-pubs
Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering
Draft
The Effect of Metal Transfer Modes on Mechanical Properties of 3CR12 Stainless Steel
Daniel M. MadyiraUniversity of Johannesburg
Faculty of Engineering and the BuiltEnvironment
Department of Mechanical Engineering Science,
Johannesburg, South [email protected]
Abdullah KaymakciUniversity of Johannesburg
Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment
Department of Mechanical Engineering Science,
Johannesburg, South [email protected]
Ntokozo Nkwanyana University of Johannesburg
Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment
Department of Mechanical Engineering Science,
Johannesburg, South [email protected]
Page 1 of 15
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/tcsme-pubs
Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering
Draft
ABSTRACT
The effect of metal transfer modes on mechanical properties of welded 3CR12 stainless steel were investigated. This was achieved
by butt welding 10 mm thick plates of 3CR12. The effect of the metal transfer modes on the microstructure and the mechanical
properties of the 3CR12 steel was then investigated as it was hypothesized that the change in welding positions will affect the
transfer modes partly due to the effect of gravity. The microscopic examination revealed that the substrate was characterized by
dual phase microstructure. Using the spectroscopic examination results, the ferritic factor calculation had shown that the
microstructure was expected to be ferritic-martensitic during air cooling process. The tensile strength and Charpy impact energy
were measured to be 498 MPa and 102 J. The heat input in the material was observed to be greater than 1 kJ/mm which is the
limiting factor for grain growth. Grain growths were observed in the heat affected zone of the welded materials. Ferritic-martensitic
microstructure was observed in the microstructure. The grain growth altered the mechanical properties of the test material. Globular
down hand had higher mechanical properties than spray down hand. Globular vertical up had better mechanical properties than
globular vertical down.
Keywords: Welding, Metal transfer mode, Microstructure, Hardness, Tensile strength
INTRODUCTION
Train wagons in South Africa are manufactured using 3CR12 corrosion-resistant steel since they carry corrosive materials such as
coal. 3CR12 is a ferritic stainless steel that has good mechanical properties in terms of strength, hardness and corrosion resistance.
In the past, the manufacturing process of the train wagons involved the rotation of the wagon during welding to allow welding only
in one direction and position, that is, flat or horizontal. The rotation of the wagon is now limited to certain directions hence welding
occurs in all welding positions. This could result in differing bonding strengths on the welds which can be more pronounced for
repair work (Transnet 2016). Figure 1 shows wagons manufactured by Transnet in Pretoria, South Africa.
Reduced weld bonding strength can lead to reduction in the wagon fatigue life necessitating further repair work. The manufacturing
and repairing processes are commonly implemented using arc welding processes. Arc welding is one of the most common methods
for joining metals, and it is important for the construction of steel structures and the fabrication of machinery. Arc welding has made
it possible to weld different types of materials such as carbon steels, low alloy steels, and aluminum. Dissimilar materials can also
be welded such as aluminum and steel, steel and magnesium and also magnesium alloys (Gharibshahiyan et al. 2012). The joining
of materials sensitive to heat has lately become an important issue during arc welding. Understanding of arc types and their inherent
properties can help enhance weld prediction and weld quality and reduce welding cost and production cycle times (P. Kah et al.
2013; Mohamat et al. 2012).
Page 2 of 15
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/tcsme-pubs
Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering
Draft
One of the most used arc welding methods in the railway industry is the Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) due to its fundamental
advantages such as adjustable penetration profiles, smooth bead, low spatter, and high welding speed. In GMAW, the metal transfer
mode due to the arc and hence the weld quality is influenced by the arc current and the arc voltage. The arc current also affects the
penetration depth. An increase in current increases the joint penetration. However, increased joint penetration also increases the
possibility of burn through and solidification cracking. That is not good, since this can lead to premature failure that can cause loss
of human lives or economic losses (Kapustka 2012; Gharibshahiyan et al. 2012; ASME 2010).
In general, the arc welding process is affected by several factors such as arc current and voltage, filler wire type and size, travel
speed of the torch and spin frequency. When selecting these parameters, the amount of heat input and the desired fusion should be
considered. One problem commonly faced by the welding industry is poor stability of the arc. Arc stability and arc length influence
the behavior of metal transfer modes. With a stable arc, metal transfer is uniform and the amount of spatter is minimal. The arc
stability and the arc length are controlled by the arc current and voltage. Another problem faced by the welding industry is the
shrinkage of the welded components which introduces residual stresses and distortion. This is due to the heating and cooling of the
welded components (Kah et al. 2014).
The common metal transfer modes during arc welding include short circuit transfer, globular transfer, spray transfer and pulsed arc
transfer. Under normal welding conditions, the welder relies on the specifications of the welding procedure. However, during repair
welding, it is common for the welder to adjust parameters on the go. This can have unintended effects especially on mechanical
properties of the weld. There is therefore, a need to investigate the effect of metal transfer modes on the mechanical properties of
the weld (Kobe Steel 2011). South African companies manufacture their train wagons mainly from 3CR12 steel. Furthermore, for
the repair of these wagons, welders mainly use the Submerged Arc Welding (SAW) and Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) processes
(Transnet 2016). During the welding process, the welders set their own voltage and weld in all welding directions using constant
set voltage, presumably. However, during the welding, depending on the weld orientation, the metal transfer mode may change. The
transfer modes are dependent upon the voltage and a small change in the voltage can effectively produce a high welding current
which consequentially increases the heat generation that directly affects the microstructure and mechanical properties of the weld (
Martikainen et al. 2013). Therefore, this research focused on investigating the effect of metal transfer modes on the weld
microstructure and the mechanical properties of the weldments of 3CR12 steel under different welding conditions.
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS AND EQUIPMENT
Materials
Coal train wagons in South Africa are manufactured using 3CR12. The same material was used for this investigation. The material
was supplied by Columbus Stainless Steel, a steel making company in Middelburg, South Africa. The material was supplied in
Page 3 of 15
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/tcsme-pubs
Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering
Draft
plates of dimensions 3000 × 1500 × 10 mm with a batch number of 3818673/ 1L 3CR12. The chemical composition of the material
according to the manufacturer certificate is given in Table 1.
Furthermore, the mechanical properties of the material as specified in the manufacturer’s certificate are given in Table 2.
Welding Machines and Welded Specimens
The ASME IX: 2010 (Welding and Brazing Qualifications) code was used as a basis for welding variables (ASME 2010). Welded
specimens were prepared on a Lincoln Electric Welding Machine (EWM), model DC 600. Its main features include full range output
voltage control for ease of operation and precision control, standard analog ammeter and voltmeter, VRD™ (Voltage Reduction
Device™) reduces OCV (open circuit voltage) when not welding for added safety (select models) and a mode switch for selecting
desired output. The welding electrode used on the machine was A5.9 ER309L, which is for GMAW.
For pulsed arc transfer modes, a special EWM machine was used to weld the test plates. The machine is specially designed to weld
in pulsed transfer modes only. The EWN machine used was the EWM Multimatrix (WPQR 1090) Phoenix Pulse welding machine.
A fluke clamp meter (Tong meter) was used to verify the voltage and current set on the GMAW machine whilst a measuring tape
was used to measure the length of the electrode during the determination of the wire feed rate. A stainless-steel brush was used to
clean the material before and after each single welding run.
To prepare the welds, the supplied material was cut into plates of dimensions 350 × 150 × 10 mm. The samples were prepared to be
welded in butt joint configuration. A 30˚ bevel angle was made on the plate, which resulted in a V-groove angle of 60˚ between the
weld plates. The geometry of the welded specimens is shown in Figure 2.
The prepared cut plates are shown in Figure 3(a).
Prepared plates were welded under different welding conditions. A welding wire (AWS A5.9 ER 390L) of 1 mm diameter was used
for all the welds. Welding was done under Argoshield 5 (Argon, oxygen and carbon dioxide) shielding gas. The shielding gas flow
rate was set between 15-20 L/min. Welding voltage was varied from 15 to 35 Volts while the current was varied from 100 to 350
Amps. This enabled the variation of the metal transfer modes. The corresponding metal transfer modes are given in Table 3. The
wire feed speed was determined by measuring the length of the wire over a span of 10 seconds. The wire feed speed was therefore
set at 0.114 m/s. The plates for each joint were tacked horizontally to maintain welding gap. They were then welding at the required
orientation to completion (see Table 4). Prepared samples were then used to prepare test specimens. Sample welded plates are shown
in Figure 3(b).
Metallurgical Analysis and Mechanical Testing
Welded samples were then cut into different specimens for metallurgical and mechanical testing procedures. Metallurgical
specimens were prepared and mounted using epoxy resin, ground and polished. These were prepared for microscopy, micro
Page 4 of 15
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/tcsme-pubs
Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering
Draft
hardness, and spectroscopy tests. Optical microscopy was conducted using an Olympus optical microscope, spectroscopic analysis
was done on an ultraviolet spectroscopic machine and the micro hardness testing was conducted on a FM-800e micro-hardness
testing machine. For spectroscopy, an ultraviolet spectroscopic machine was used.
Tensile Test Specimens
Tensile test specimens were also prepared from the welded samples. Flat bars were cut using a band saw from the welded plates at
an orientation perpendicular to the weld. The bars were then shaped into doggy bone shape using a milling machine. The welded
joint appears in the centre of the gauge section of the specimens. Tensile testing was conducted on an MTS tensile testing machine
using a 100 kN load cell.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Spectroscopic Examination
The spectroscopic examination confirmed that the material supplied was a 3CR12 stainless steel with carbon content less than 0.03%
as specified by the manufacturer. The chromium content was also in the range of the expected values i.e. 10.5-12.5%. The silicone
content was less than 1%; manganese 1.5%; phosphorus content 0.4%; sulphur content was greater than 0.015% and lastly nickel
content fell in the range of 0.3-1.5%.
Microscopic Examination
The microstructure of the parent material was found to be a ferritic stainless steel. This was characterized by two phase or dual
phase microstructure i.e., alpha phase and beta phase grain structures. The alpha phase appears to be light and beta phase appears to
be dark in color. This is clear in Figure 4(a). The microstructures observed for some of the metal transfer modes are shown in Figures
4(b) to (d). In all the figures, three zones can be distinguished i.e. the parent material, the heat affected zone with large grain sizes
and the weld metal. The size of the grains reflects the effect of the metal transfer modes on the microstructure. This is mainly
governed by the amount of heat input as the minimum heat input for grain growth in 3CR12 has been reported to be 1 kJ/mm.
However, the heat inputs computed for the test cases were 1.89 kJ/mm for globular down, 3.77 kJ/mm for globular up and 2.69
kJ/mm for spray down. The grain growth at higher voltages was also observed by Gharibshahiyan et al. (Gharibshahiyan et al.
2011).
Micro hardness Results
Micro hardness results for the test samples are presented in Table 5. These show the comparison for the hardness values of the
parent material (PM), weld material (WM) and the heat affected zone (HAZ). Acceptance criteria was developed based on the
literature from the previous studies done by Akinlabi et al. (Akinlabi 2014) ) where they presented the micro-hardness of 3CR12
steel as 146 HV and for the heat treated and air cooled 3CR12 specimen as ±150 HV for parent material values. Accordingly, these
Page 5 of 15
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/tcsme-pubs
Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering
Draft
values were used as acceptance levels with a range or class of ±50 HV. The globular vertically down did not meet the acceptance
criteria for good weld performance. Higher hardness values were observed for the parent material and the welded material compared
to the heat affected zone. This was in agreement with the findings made by Gharibshahiyan et al. (Gharibshahiyan et al. 2012)
which they attributed to the increased grain growth size and the increased penetration depth of the heat, a phenomenon also observed
by Ibrahim et al. (Ibrahim et al. 2012).
Mechanical Test Results
The grains generally elongated in the casting direction hence the mechanical properties of the parent material were tested in the
longitudinal and transverse direction to determine the difference in Charpy and tensile test properties. The results of the longitudinal
and transverse samples are given in Table 6. The mechanical properties were found to be lower in the transverse direction compared
to the longitudinal direction. This is as expected. The obtained values were generally in agreement with the material certificate
supplied by the manufacturer.
The tensile test results for the specimens prepared at various metal transfer modes are summarised in Table 7. The results show that
the globular down hand (GDH) has the best performance compared to the other transfer modes in terms of mechanical performance
as shown by the ranking column in the table.
The UTS and yield strength of globular down hand were higher than those of spray down hand while the % elongation and the %
reduction of area of globular is lower than that of spray down hand. Globular vertical up had better mechanical properties than
globular vertical down. The results show that the globular transfer mode produces better mechanical properties in down hand
position. This is due to the lower heat input to the material during to the welding process. The current and voltage of the globular
transfer mode are lower than those of spray transfer mode. This results in more heat input when using spray transfer mode under
constant welding speed, which results in severe change in the mechanical properties of the stainless steel.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Table 8 shows the ranking criteria of the four test plates that were welded and tested using visual inspection, micro-hardness testing
and tensile testing.
Globular down hand had better results followed by spray down hand, globular vertical up and lastly globular vertical down. Table
9 shows the ranking of the transfer modes and the welding positions based on macroscopic examination according to ISO 5817.
CONCLUSIONS
This paper investigated the effect of metal transfer modes on the mechanical performance of 3CR12 stainless steel. Samples were
prepared using GMAW. Welding parameters (voltage and current) were varied to ensure the existence of four metal transfer modes.
These modes were then applied to different welding positions which, included vertically up and down. Specimens produced under
Page 6 of 15
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/tcsme-pubs
Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering
Draft
these conditions were examined using microstructure, micro hardness, Charpy and tensile testing analysis. The results obtained led
to the following conclusions:
1. All specimens exhibited good welded joints
2. The heat input for all the test configurations were more than 1 kJ/mm hence this resulted in grain growth that was more
pronounced in the heat affected zone (HAZ)
3. Microstructural analysis verified that there was grain growth in the HAZ for all specimens
4. Grain growth was responsible for most of the changes in mechanical properties
5. Microhardness tests indicated higher values for the parent metal and the weld metal compared to the HAZ
6. Mechanical properties (Charpy and tensile) of the welds were lower than those of the parent material as expected
7. The globular down hand test plate produced better mechanical properties than spray down hand metal transfer mode due
to lower heat input
8. Spray vertical up, spray vertical down and spray overhead could not be welded due to high heat input. The plates were
burning during the penetration run
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to acknowledge Transnet Engineering (Pretoria) for the provision of materials and the welding and testing
facilities.
REFERENCES
Akinlabi, Esther T, and Stephen A Akinlabi. 2014. “Characterising the Effects of Heat Treatment on 3CR12 and AISI 316 Stainless
Steels” 2050 (2): 256–61.
ASME. 2010. Qualification Standard for Welding and Brazing Procedures, Welders, Brazers, and Welding and Brazing Operators.
2010 ed. New York, NY: ASME Pressure and Boiler Vessel Committee Subcommittee on Welding and American Society of
Mechanical Engineers.
Gharibshahiyan, Ehsan, Abbas Honarbakhsh Raouf, Nader Parvin, and Mehdi Rahimian. 2011. “The Effect of Microstructure on
Hardness and Toughness of Low Carbon Welded Steel Using Inert Gas Welding.” Materials and Design 32 (4): 2042–48.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.056.
Gharibshahiyan, Ehsan, Abbas Honarbakhsh Raouf, Nader Parvin, Mehdi Rahimian, Nick Kapustka, Paul Kah, Hamidreza Latifi,
et al. 2012. “The Effect of Flux Core Arc Welding (FCAW) Processes on Different Parameters.” Procedia Engineering 41
Page 7 of 15
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/tcsme-pubs
Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering
Draft
(1): 1497–1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4513-5.
Ibrahim, Izzatul Aini, Syarul Asraf Mohamat, Amalina Amir, and Abdul Ghalib. 2012. “The Effect of Gas Metal Arc Welding
(GMAW) Processes on Different Welding Parameters.” Procedia Engineering 41 (Iris): 1502–6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.342.
Kah, P., R. Suoranta, and J. Martikainen. 2013. “Advanced Gas Metal Arc Welding Processes.” International Journal of Advanced
Manufacturing Technology 67 (1–4): 655–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4513-5.
Kah, Paul, Hamidreza Latifi, Raimo Suoranta, Jukka Martikainen, and Markku Pirinen. 2014. “Usability of Arc Types in Industrial
Welding.” International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering 9 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40712-014-
0015-6.
Kapustka, Nick. 2012. “Arc Welding Capabilities at EWI.”
Kobe Steel. 2011. “The ABC’s of Arc Welding and Inspection,” 93.
Mohamat, Syarul Asraf, Izzatul Aini Izatul Aini Ibrahim, Amalina Amir, Abdul Ghalib, Kobe Steel, P. Kah, R. Suoranta, et al.
2012. “The Effect of Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) Processes on Different Welding Parameters.” Procedia Engineering
41 (April 2016): 1502–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2017.03.004.
Transnet. 2016. “Transnet Freight Rail.” 2016. http://www.transnetfreightrail-tfr.net.
Page 8 of 15
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/tcsme-pubs
Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering
Draft
Table 1: Chemical composition of 3CR12 as supplied (in accordance to ASTM A240 and EN 10088-2)
Element C Si Mn P S Cr Ni Others
Content 0.03 1.0 2.0 0.04 0.03 10.5 1.5 0.6
Table 2: Mechanical properties of 3CR12 as supplied (in accordance to ASTM A240 and EN 10088-2)
Property Density
(kg/m3)
Elastic Modulus (GPa)
Yield Strength (MPa)
Ultimate Tensile Strength (MPa)
Max BHN
Value 7 680 200 300 460 220
Table 3: Experimental parameters
Parameters Arc Voltage Welding Current Transfer Modes
Units Volts Amps -
Test 1 15 150 Short Circuit
Test 2 25 250 Globular
Test 3 35 350 Spray
Test 4 30 100 Pulsed Arc
Table 4: Welding positions
Welding Positions Code Transfer Modes No. of Samples
Flat 1 G 4 4
Vertical up 2 G 4 4
Vertical down 3 G 4 4
Overhead 4 G 4 4
Page 9 of 15
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/tcsme-pubs
Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering
Draft
Table 5: Micro hardness results for varying metal transfer modes
Table 6: Mechanical test results of parent material
Properties Transverse direction Longitudinal direction
Yield Strength (MPa) 319 352
Tensile Strength (MPa) 443 498
% Elongation 43 37
% Reduction Area 66 67
Impact Strength (J) @ room temperature
151 102
Table 7: Summary of tensile test results for varying metal transfer modes
3CR12 UTS (MPa) YIELD (MPa) EL (%) RA (%) Ranking
GDH 498 352 16.2 33.6 1
GVU 468 313.7 25.5 58.3 2
GVD 350 272.3 14.4 12.5 4
SDH 415 313.7 16.2 33.57 3
Test Plates LHAZ or PM WM HHAZ Acceptance criterion
GDH 181.65 HV 212.2 HV 173.35 HV
GVU 200.5 HV 223.85 HV 182.25 HV
GVD 196.3 HV 182.1 HV 232.1 HV x
SDH 177.2 HV 246.2 HV 170.85 HV
Page 10 of 15
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/tcsme-pubs
Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering
Draft
Table 8: Ranking criteria of weld test plates
3CR12 Weld Plates
Macrostructure Micro-hardness Test
Tensile Test Score
GDH 4 4 4 12
GVU 2.5 3 3 8.5
GVD 1.5 3 1 5.5
SDH 4 3 2 9
Table 9: Weld soundness ranking
Parameters 1G 3G (Up) 3G (Down) 4G
Short Circuit Good Average Poor Poor
Globular Good Average Poor Poor
Spray Average Poor Poor Poor
Pulsed Good Average - -
List of Figures
Figure 1: Train wagons manufactured from 3CR12 stainless steel (Transnet 2016)Figure 2: Specimen geometryFigure 3: Prepared specimens (a) Blank plates (b) Welded sampleFigure 4: Microstructures (a) Parent materials (b) Globular down (GDH) (c) Globular up (GVU) (d) Spray down (SDH)
List of Tables
Table 1: Chemical composition of 3CR12 as supplied (in accordance to ASTM A240 and EN 10088-2)Table 2: Mechanical properties of 3CR12 as supplied (in accordance to ASTM A240 and EN 10088-2)Table 3: Experimental parametersTable 4: Welding positionsTable 5: Micro hardness results for varying metal transfer modesTable 6: Mechanical test results of parent materialTable 7: Summary of tensile test results for varying metal transfer modesTable 8: Ranking criteria of weld test platesTable 9: Weld soundness ranking
Page 11 of 15
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/tcsme-pubs
Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering
Draft
Page 12 of 15
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/tcsme-pubs
Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering
Draft
Page 13 of 15
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/tcsme-pubs
Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering
Draft(a) (b)
Page 14 of 15
https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/tcsme-pubs
Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering