Download - The Current State of Reference
The current state of reference: Select results of the global reference survey
Elisabeth Leonard, MSLS, MBAMarket Research Analyst,SAGETwitter: @ElisabethAnn, #RefTalk
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
Agenda Budgets Perceptions of reference Questions and comments
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
What I did Invitations to complete the survey were sent
to various listservs, including publib, colldev, acqnet, and SLA chapter lists globally.
Email invitations were sent to 800 reference, collection development, and acquisition librarians.
There were 32 questions. Completed surveys were eligible to win an
iPad mini.Followed up with interviews and focus
groups.
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
DemographicsDemographics 471 responses (600+ came to the first
page) 90% came from North America, 6% from
Asia Pacific, 2% from Europe, 1% from South America, and 0.5% from Africa.
58% were from academic libraries, 13% from corporate libraries, 12% from government or military libraries, and 1% from school libraries.
Trends: budgets
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
Reference budgets: last 5 yearsAcademic Public Special
Increased 10% 15% 12%
Stayed the same
34% 15% 29%
Decreased 49% 65% 49%
Don’t know 7% 5% 9%
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
Reference budgets: next 5 years
Academic Public Special
Increase 10% 6% 18%
Stay the same
34% 44% 32%
Decrease 54% 50% 44%
Don’t spend now
1% 0% 5%
Eliminated 0.6% 0% 0.9%
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
Comparing trends in special libraries
Increased Stayed the same Decreased Don’t know 0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Last 5 yearsNext 5 years
General trends: budgetsLibraries are consolidating their budget
lines, with some no longer including a separate budget line for reference
Spending often comes out of subject funds and e-resources fund
A preference for e-referenceGrowth to support new programsReduction because of journals spend and
increased e-resources spend Importance of one time funds
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
Spending comes from subject funds
“We have not had a reference budget for some time now. Reference resources that are acquired now come out of subject area budgets along with any resources needed for that area.”
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
Funds move to e-resources line “Although the amount of the reference
budget is probably about the same, the type of materials purchases are quite different. We used to spend considerable money on paper monographs, standing orders, and reference serials. We spend very little on any of those, but much of the money we spent has now been transferred into the budget for online resources.”
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
Consolidation of budget lines
“We continue to purchase reference materials but we don't have a separate "reference" budget line. We engaged in some reorganization a few years ago, and that included folding many separate small budget lines into fewer, larger, ones.”
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
A preference for e-reference“We have a shared fund for purchases of online resources - many of which are A&I databases and thus 'reference'. But they are not charged to our 'reference' fund. Our 'reference' fund is only for print material. So our online reference buying is increasing each year. Our print reference buying is holding steady or decreasing.”
Growth from new programs“Our budget was cut last year, but we will be gaining 3 new residency programs. Therefore, in certain areas, I think our budget will increase to meet GME requirements.”
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
Importance of one time funds“We've seen fluctuations in our reference purchasing because, though we have definitely seen cuts in the amount of monies we spend, we've also been the beneficiaries of one-time money which has then been used to purchase all sorts of materials, including reference materials. This has had the overall effect of off-setting cuts in the budget.”
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
“E” (and a little print)Academic Public Special
Print only 0.5% 0% 3%
Print preferred 4% 5% 6%
Online only 7% 0% 11%
Online preferred 68% 35% 50%
No preference 22% 60% 31%
No longer purchase reference
1% 0% 5%
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
Perceptions of reference
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
Who is reference for Undergraduates more than graduates Research faculty more than teaching
faculty Doctors more than nurses
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
Who is reference for?
“Sometimes the requests come from patrons, but more often from colleagues (after dealing with patrons and noticing a need) and professors.”
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
But they do ask for Subject handbooks Databases Encyclopedias Dictionaries Updated editions
As well as journals, articles and textbooks
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
But is it “reference”? “We have tried to use the term [reference] less
since today's students do not identify with the term. I also find for my business students that encyclopedias, handbooks and the like are not necessary items. They need industry report, market report types of resources. They use the article databases, but frankly they can find so much on the open web, that even those article databases are only half as valuable as they once were.” Business Librarian, Academic Library, USA
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
Perceptions of awareness
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
% of patrons librarians believe are aware of reference resources
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
Librarian satisfaction with perceived patron awareness
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
Top ways librarians think patrons discover reference resources
Following the direction of a librarian Following the direction of an instructor Searching online (eg. Google)
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
Are librarians satisfied with the use reference resources get?
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
Issues with discovery The Discovery service doesn't make it
possible to filter for this content. Our catalog does a great job, but the students don't start there. Our major reference vendor's content isn't in the Discovery service (yet). Reference Universe, the index to reference content, does not work well enough in the Discovery Layer or even on its own to get students to that content. A problem that needs to be fixed.
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
It’s not just discovery It can always be better Free alternative resources Patrons are not on board Not enough value for the money Not enough promotion The value is in the answer C’est la vie
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
What does it all mean? User behavior has changed Information sources have changed Reference is no longer a place
Therefore definitions for reference have changed and buying of “reference” has changed
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
It’s bigger than reference“I always want people to know what we
have and to use it more. It is an uphill battle to get them to use the library instead of Google (or other search engine) as their starting place.”
Library Director, US
@ElisabethAnn and/or #RefTalk
Questions? Comments?Elisabeth Leonard, MSLS, MBATwitter: @ElisabethAnnEmail: [email protected]