Advanced Stormwater Design Webcast Series
Stormwater Wetlands Reconsidered
Photo Credit: South River Federation
Welcome to the Webcast
• To Ask a Question – Submit your question in the chat box located to the left of the
slides. We will answer as many as possible during Q&A.
• To Answer a Poll Question – Simply select the preferred option. For those viewing this session
alongside several colleagues, respond in a manner that represents your organization as a whole.
• We ARE Recording this Session – All comments and questions will be recorded and included in the
archives. We will notify you as soon as the recording and related resources are loaded on the web.
• We Appreciate Your Feedback – Fill out our evaluations – our funders need to hear it!
Speaker Info
Albert McCullough, Sustainable Science, LLC, [email protected]
Dave Hirschman, Center for Watershed Protection, [email protected]
Tom Schueler, Chesapeake Stormwater Network, [email protected]
Cecilia Lane, Chesapeake Stormwater Network, [email protected]
To learn how you can have access to: Discounted Webcasts
Free One-day design workshops Intensive master stormwater design seminars
Direct On-site technical assistance Self guided web-based learning modules
Visit: www.chesapeakestormwater.net
Chesapeake Bay Stormwater Training Partnership
CSN’s 2014 Webcast Series
No. Date Series Topic
10 June 12 Advanced Stormwater Design Rainwater Harvesting
11 June 26 Advanced Stormwater Design Filter Strips & Disconnections
http://chesapeakestormwater.net/events/categories/2014-webcast-series/
Webcast Agenda
• Evolution of the Practice
• Why a Seldom Used Practice is Poised for a Resurgence
• Constructed Wetland Myths
• New Constructed Wetland Applications
• Feasibility and Design Issues
• Construction and Maintenance
• Establishing the Wetland Plant Community
Poll Question #1
How many people are watching with you today?
• Just me
• 2-5 people
• 6-10 people
• > 10 people
Poll Question #2
Tell us a little about yourselves…who are you representing today?
• Design professional
• MS4 Phase 1
• MS4 Phase 2
• State government
• Federal government
• Other
Poll Question #3
Have you designed a constructed wetland in the last year ?
• Yes
• No
• No, although I did fill in a natural wetland (just kidding, we hope! )
Evolution of the Practice
Copyright 2000, Center for Watershed Protection
The First Generation of Stormwater Wetlands
The Second Generation: Better diversity but still the freshwater emergent model
The Third Generation: The Forested Wetland
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Green roof
Constructed wetland
Sand filters
Submerged gravel wetlands
Wet ponds
Rainwater harvesting
Compost soil amendements
Extended detention ponds
Permeable pavement
Filter strips
Rain gardens
Dry swale
Infiltration practices
Grass swale/channel
Impervious disconnection
Bioretention
Estimated # of Practices Implemented in the Last Year
Chesapeake Bay Urban BMP Implementation Survey Aggregate Reported BMPs Lasy Year by 240+ Survey Respondents
CSN, 2014
Not a Lot of Constructed Wetlands Being Built These Days
Why are so few constructed wetlands being built ?
• Use discouraged since they are not classified as a ESD, LID or Runoff Reduction Practice in new state stormwater manuals
• Available land (ponds easier)
• Concerns about nuisances (mosquitoes etc) and wetland regulatory status
• Lack of understanding about “vegetation”
• Other Factors ?
Why they may be poised for a resurgence
• Potential for greater nutrient reduction
• Cost effective approach for meeting water quality and peak discharge together
• New design applications
• Strong retrofit potential
• Great solution in the coastal plain
• Promote habitat and ecosystem services
• Lower long-term maintenance efforts
Recent Research on Natural and Constructed Wetlands Informs Design
• Effect of stormwater runoff in degrading of natural wetlands (bounce)
• Most natural wetlands are forested
• While nutrient removal in constructed wetlands is variable, designers have not tried enhancing denitrification (e.g., add carbon and anoxic conditions.
• Have not really measured runoff reduction by constructed wetlands
Debunking Myths About Constructed Wetlands
Myth No. 1 Stormwater Wetlands Breed Mosquitoes
• Not generally a problem unless cattails are present
• Scatter deep pools around wetland and connect them with channels
• Dragonflies
• Other LID practices pose greater risk
Myth No. 2 Stormwater Wetlands Need to Be Deep
to Prevent Them From Drying Out
• Once plant community is initially established, stormwater wetlands will recover in the next growing season even after extended droughts
Myth No. 3 What we plant will persist over time
• Experience has shown that many of the species that are initially planted will not persist over time, due to competition, growing conditions, herbivory, and the arrival of volunteer and/or invasive species
Myth No. 4 Natural wetlands have a lot of standing
water
• Most wetlands found in nature have saturated soils and are only inundated seasonally or after extended wet periods
• Plant diversity declines with increasing ponding depth and water bounce
• Many of the ecological services in the wetlands are due to groundwater interactions
Myth No. 5 Constructed wetlands eventually
become a jurisdictional wetlands which are regulated by the Corps
• The policy for decades has been that they are considered a treatment wetland and NOT a jurisdictional wetland
• The only exception would be for “abandoned” facilities that are no longer maintained for their stormwater function
New Constructed Wetland Applications
• Wooded Wetlands
• Pond Wetland Combo
• Submerged Gravel Wetlands
• Dry Pond Retrofits
• Tax Ditch Restoration
• Linear Wetland
• Regenerative Conveyance Systems
Wooded Wetland
Pond Wetland Design
Pond Wetland Combination
• Space-saver for denser development sites.
• Side by side pond and wetland.
• On-line pond and off-line wetland.
• Wetland has 4 to 6 cells that step down a foot of elevation each.
• Pond bleeds water into wetland during dry weather.
• Pond has 70% of total treatment volume.
Submerged Gravel Wetlands
Photos Courtesy of Univ. of New Hampshire Stormwater Center
Submerged Gravel Wetland
Photo & image: Univ. of New Hampshire Stormwater Center
DRY POND CONVERSION RETROFIT
DRY POND
CONSTRUCTED WETLAND
Coastal Plain Tax Ditch Restoration
Linear Wetlands
Linear Wet Swale
Feasibility and Design Issues
1. Level 1 and 2 Design
2. Water Balance
3. Geometry/Flow Path
4. Maintenance Reduction
1. Level 1 and 2 Wetland Design
Level 1 Level 2
Good design to provide treatment, safety, functionality
Includes design enhancements for runoff reduction and/or pollutant removal: • Size, treatment volume • Flow path/multiple cells/tree
peninsulas • Limited “bounce” above pool
VA Constructed Wetland Performance Credit
35
Level 1 Level 2
Runoff Reduction = 0% TP Reduction = 50%
Runoff Reduction = 0% TP Reduction = 75%
NOTE: Many states do NOT have Level 1 and 2 designs because constructed wetlands are not considered a runoff reduction practice for volume reduction criteria.
Constructed Wetland Performance Credit
Maximize Performance & Optimize Sizing: Provide Runoff Reduction Upstream From
Constructed Wetland
Level 1 Wetland Design (VA)
• Single basin with forebay & micropool
• Some storage allowed above pool
• Surface area < 3% of contributing drainage area
• Length/Width Ration ≥ 2:1
• Emergent plant community
Different Levels of BMP Design
Level 1: Sizing • Treatment Volume (Tv) = Rv x A
• ≥ 50% in pool + forebay + micropool
• ≤ 50% above pool
• Detention storage can also be above pool, as long as “bounce” ≤ 12” for 1-inch rainfall & 1-year storm
State-Specific Sizing Methods May Apply
Different Levels of BMP Design
Level 2: Multi-Cell or Pond Wetland
Different Levels of BMP Design
Level 2: Multi-Cell or Pond Wetland
• Multiple cells or pond + wetland cells;
• Surface area > 3% of contributing DA;
• Length/Width Ratio ≥ 3:1
Different Levels of BMP Design
Level 2: Multi-Cell or Pond Wetland
• No ED or detention storage above pool;
• Add microtopography features;
• Emergent + wooded wetland features.
Minimal Water Level Fluctuation (‘bounce’) = Better Plant Community
2. Water Balance Considerations
• Drought rainfall
• Rainfall/runoff that enters wetland from CDA
• Wetland surface area
• Summer ET
• Infiltration loss
• Maintain small pool of water as safety factor (e.g. 6”)
Water Balance Equation
Bill Hunt, NCSU:
DP = RFm * EF * WS/WL – ET – INF – RES
Where: DP = Depth of pool (inches)
RFm = Monthly rainfall during drought (inches)
EF = Fraction of rainfall entering wetland (CDA Rv)
WS/WL = Ratio of contributing DA to wetland Surface Area
ET = Summer evapotranspiration rate (inches; assume 8 inches)
INF = Monthly infiltration loss (assume 7.2 inches @ 0.01 inch/hour)
RES = Reservoir of water for a factor of safety (assume 6 inches)
Example Calculation
With Basic “Worst-Case” Assumptions:
DP = RFm * EF * WS/WL – ET – INF – RES
• RFm = Rainfall during drought = 0”
• EF = Fraction of rainfall entering wetland = (CDA Rv) = 10*0.45 = 4.5
• WS/WL = Ratio of DA to SA = 10 / 0.3 = 33.3 • ET = summer evapotranspiration = 8” • INF = Summer Monthly infiltration loss = 7.2” • Reservoir of water safety factor = 6”
DP = (0” * 8” * 33.3) – 8” – 7.2” – 6” = 21.2 = 22”
Minimum Pool Depth = 22 inches
• Minimum pool may be less if summer/drought groundwater/ baseflow can be documented
Beware of Pocket Wetlands !
Key Design Considerations
Wetland Without the “Wet”
Adjustable Weir/Flashboard
You Don’t Always Know How Water Balance Will Work Out. . .
Plan for Adaptability
3. Geometry and Flow Path
Length to Width Ratio
Outlet
Structure
L
Inlet
Structure W
Length/Width Ratio = L/W, where:
L = Length from inlet to outlet
W = Average width
Outlet
Structure
L
Inlet
Structure W
Outlet
Structure
L
Inlet
Structure W
Length/Width Ratio = L/W, where:
L = Length from inlet to outlet
W = Average width
Inlet
Outlet
L/W = 3.4:1
Seek Longer Flow Path
Shortest Flow Path Criteria
Outlet
Structure
Curb Inlets
L
SFP
Shortest Flow Path Ratio = SFP/L
SFP = Length of shortest flow path from an inlet to outlet
L = Overall length of facility
Outlet
Structure
Curb Inlets
L
SFP
Outlet
Structure
Curb Inlets
L
SFP
Shortest Flow Path Ratio = SFP/L
SFP = Length of shortest flow path from an inlet to outlet
L = Overall length of facility
Virginia Wetland Geometry Criteria
L/W Ratio Shortest Flow Path Ratio
Level 1 = 2.0
Level 2 = 3.0 or multi-cell
Level 1 = 0.5
Level 2 = 0.8
Internal Micro-topography
Specify at least two mechanisms to create better microtopography
• Snags
• Inverted rootwads
• Gravel layers
• Cobble sand weirs
• Coir fiber logs
• Scattered pools
• Peninsulas
High Marsh/Tree Peninsulas
Multiple Cells: forebay, wetland cells
Photo: Triangle Park Stormwater Treatment Wet Swale, Town of Rising Sun, MD
Photo: Triangle Park Stormwater Treatment Wet Swale, Town of Rising Sun, MD
Imbricated Rock Weir
4. Maintenance Reduction Features:
• Access for maintenance
• Sediment forebay
• Safety benches
• Preventing clogging at riser/weir outlet
Make it Easy to Get to it !
Fencing and Slope Considerations
Don’t worry homeowners, here we come!
Place riser in the embankment instead of open water.
Clogging Reduction
• Low flow orifice ≥ 3” (although that alone is not sufficient)
• Internal orifice plates within pipe
• Trash racks, half-round CMP, reverse slope pipe into micro-pool
Pool Outflow Pipe/Drain:
Make sure the “plumbing can be accessed and is in operable condition.
Construction and Maintenance
Tips
Construction
Critical Points • Ready to Install?
– Conversion from ESC
• Secondary ESC Measures – divert flow around
wetland area
•Embankments & Outlets
•Internal berms/weirs
•Micro-topographic features
•Stabilize exposed areas
Stage 1 Inspection:
Construction
Critical Points • Connect drainage area • Measure & stake planting depth
zones • Planting (April – June) – order
plants months in advance – Container grown or plugs – Wetland seed mixes – Volunteers (remaining areas)
• Goose Protection • Plant wetland fringe & buffer • Check inundation zones/status
Stage 2 Inspection:
Construction
• Dewater
• Dredge
• Regrade to rough design elevations
Conversions From ESC Facilities
Construction
• Orange fence along perimeter
• Criss-cross web of white string over plants
• Keep in place until plants are big enough to not be enticing to geese
Source: City of Waynesboro, VA
After Planting: Protect Plants from Geese Predation
Wetland Maintenance
CWP (2009)
General Performance Problems with Constructed Stormwater
Wetland (n=22)
68%
23%
18%
14%
5%
5%
5%
0%
0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Vegetation/Habitat
Hydrology
Maintenance
Stability
Aesthetics/Placement
Consistency with Design
Grading/Elevations
Treatment Effectiveness
Structural
Performance Issues in the Field
Initial Maintenance
First 1 – 2 Years:
• Spot reseeding
• Watering (trees, other plants as needed)
• Reinforcement plantings
• Develop early strategy for invasives (e.g., semi-annual removal)
Long Term Maintenance
Routine • Monitor plant community
• Inlets, embankments, berms, spillways, slopes, etc.
Non-Routine • Invasives control (when invasive cover 15% of
wetland cell)
• Thinning/harvesting of woody growth (except wooded wetland features)
• Sediment removal from forebays, cells
Establishing the Wetland Plant Community
Establishing the Wetland Plant Community
• Wetlands are similar to us – Defined by where they
live
– Evolve to perform specific work
– Associate with those they like
– Tolerate life stresses
Stormwater Wetland Vegetation Success Metrics
• Should be similar to nearby natural wetland systems
• Maximize water contact with vegetation for best water quality enhancement
• Formed of species that naturally associate together
• Hydrology design behavior matched to the wetland type
Long, Meandering Flow Path A Worthy Goal Indeed!
Reference Wetland Systems
• Identifies what types of plant species & arrangements
• Provides acceptable hydrology ranges
• Information can be obtained from local wetland delineators and regional wetland plant references
Adjusting Water Flow and Availability
• Design should allow for easy water adjustment
• Maintenance activities include: – Clearing and repairing water control and
conveyance devices
– Removing animal structures and repair damage from tunneling
– Conveying excess water
– Installing stone edging in erosive settings
– Adjusting existing structures
Planting Plan for Depth Zones:
Depth Zones (inches):
1. -6 to -12 below normal pool
2. -6 to normal pool
3. Normal pool to +12
4. +12 to +36 above normal pool
See State Manuals for Plant Lists; Commercially-Available Natives Preferred
Detailed Planting Plan
Plant Schedule & Details
Sustaining Vegetation
• Maintenance activities include: – Watering or irrigating
– Controlling diseases and infestations
– Eliminating invasive species
– Removing wracks, algal mats and other litter
– Replanting and reseeding
– Using animal management techniques
Top 10 Causes of Vegetation Failure
• Unsuitable planting substrate
• Too wet or too dry • Salt buildup in soils • Incorrect elevations and
incorrect species • Poorly graded site • Non-viable seed or poor
seeding techniques • Burning of plants by
fertilizer • Plant float out • Herbivory • Insects & disease
Invasive Plants: A good offense is the best defense
• Make sure planned hydrology does not exceed the planned wetland vegetation community tolerance.
• Select plant material based on nearby natural wetlands and the proposed site conditions.
• Design the wetland planting scheme to coalesce vegetation in one year will provide resistance to invasive encroachment.
• A semiannual monitoring and maintenance plan that includes invasive removal is essential for success.
Wildlife Management Techniques
• Population reductions
• Use of tree guards and fences
• Animal repellents
• Tree peninsulas
• Tree islands
• Wetland buffers above ED zone
Trees (Wetter is Not Better!)
Wetland Vegetation Worthy Life Goals
• Project sponsors should anticipate both expected and unexpected
• Design should strive for self-maintenance
• Maintenance typically required for 1 to 2 years after completion of construction until fully grown in
• Monitoring is needed to identify problems early before becoming expensive to solve
Questions and Comments
EXISTING RETROFITS
BMP CONVERSION
DRY POND
CONSTRUCTED WETLAND
Info From Stormwater Plan/Report
• D.A. = 30.8 acres • Managed Turf = 15.1 acres • Impervious = 15.7 acres • CN = 80 • WQV = 55,560 cubic feet
Incremental Credit
BMP Conversion
• Existing ED Pond (Level 1?) – use VA RR rates
• Convert to Constructed Wetland
BMP Enhancement
• Existing ED Pond (Level 1) – use VA RR rates
• Enhance to Level 2 ED Pond w/ wetland features
Results
TP TN
Load From D.A. (lbs) 43.19 319.95
Existing ED Pond Efficiency (Expert Panel, Level 1)
15% 10%
Existing Load Reduction (lbs) 6.48 32.00
BMP Conversion To Constructed Wetland
Efficiency for Constructed Wetland (ST) 55% 35%
Load Reduction From Curve 18.61 87.73
Delta 12.13 55.73
BMP Enhancement: Wetland Cells, Flowpath
Load Reduction for Level 2 ED Pond 31% 24%
Load Reduction 13.39 76.79
Delta 6.91 44.79
• Phosphorus Removal = 14 pounds • $ = $200K • Cost Effectiveness = $14,000/pound
Design Example for
New/Redevelopment Situations
Design Example
• 15 acres, 25 ¼ acre lots
• Impervious = 3.15 ac. (lots + roads)
• Managed Turf = 3.44 ac.
• Open Space = 6.59 ac.
Design Example
Runoff Reduction Spreadsheet (Virginia)
• Site Treatment Volume (Tv) = 14,831 cubic feet
• TP Load = 9.32 lbs/acre/year
• TN Load = 66.66 lbs/acre/year
• VA TP Reduction to Meet 0.41 lbs/acre/year = 3.17 lbs
102
Design Example
TvBMP Constructed Wetland = 13,610 cf Runoff Reduction = 0
Design Scenario 1: Just Constructed Wetland
Design Example
Dry Swale #1 with additional 1.0 ac. Impervious
Design Scenario 2: Constructed Wetland with Upstream Runoff Reduction
Constructed Wetland (with additional 1.58 ac. Impervious + 3.44 ac. turf)
0.57 ac. Simple Disconnection to amended filter path
Design Example
Wetland TvBMP from immediate DA = 8,195 ft3
Tv remaining from upstream RR BMPs = 2,659 ft3
Wetland Design TvBMP = 10,854 ft3
Volume Reduced by upstream RR = 2,756 ft3
Scenario 2: Constructed Wetland with Upstream Runoff Reduction
Where To Find Design Resources: Virginia
• Laws, Regulations, Permits: Virginia Dept. of Environmental Quality, Stormwater: http://www.deq.virginia.gov/Programs/Water/StormwaterManagement.aspx
• BMP Specifications: Virginia Stormwater BMP Clearinghouse, Non-Proprietary (Constructed Wetland = Specification #13): http://vwrrc.vt.edu/swc/NonProprietaryBMPs.html
• Design Guidance for Karst, Coastal, Urban/Redevelopment: Chesapeake Stormwater Network, Technical Bulletins: http://chesapeakestormwater.net/category/publications/csn-technical-bulletins/
Where To Find Design Resources: West Virginia
• Laws, Regulations, Permits: West Virginia Dept. of Environmental Protection: http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/Programs/stormwater/Pages/sw_home.aspx
• BMP Specifications: West Virginia Stormwater Management & Design Guidance Manual (Constructed Wetland = Specification 4.2.11): http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/Programs/stormwater/MS4/Pages/StormwaterManagementDesignandGuidanceManual.aspx
• Design Guidance for Karst, Coastal, Urban/Redevelopment: Chesapeake Stormwater Network, Technical Bulletins: http://chesapeakestormwater.net/category/publications/csn-technical-bulletins/
Where To Find Design Resources: D.C.
• Stormwater Rule: District Department of the Environment: http://ddoe.dc.gov/node/610592
• BMP Specifications: D.C. Stormwater Management Guidebook (Wetlands = Specification 3.11): http://ddoe.dc.gov/node/610622
• Design Guidance for Karst, Coastal, Urban/Redevelopment: Chesapeake Stormwater Network, Technical Bulletins: http://chesapeakestormwater.net/category/publications/csn-technical-bulletins/
Where To Find Design Resources: Delaware
• Laws, Regulations, Permits: Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Control: http://www.dnrec.delaware.gov/swc/pages/sedimentstormwater.aspx
• BMP Specifications: Sediment & Stormwater Technical Document (Constructed Wetland = Appendix 3.06.2.12): http://www.dnrec.delaware.gov/swc/Drainage/Pages/Technical_document.aspx
• Design Guidance for Karst, Coastal, Urban/Redevelopment: Chesapeake Stormwater Network, Technical Bulletins: http://chesapeakestormwater.net/category/publications/csn-technical-bulletins/
Where To Find Design Resources: Maryland
• Laws, Regulations, Permits: Department of the Environment: http://www.mde.maryland.gov/programs/Water/StormwaterManagementProgram/SedimentandStormwaterHome/Pages/Programs/WaterPrograms/SedimentandStormwater/home/index.aspx
• BMP Specifications: Maryland Stormwater Design Manual (Constructed Wetland = Section 3.2): http://www.mde.maryland.gov/programs/Water/StormwaterManagementProgram/MarylandStormwaterDesignManual/Pages/Programs/WaterPrograms/SedimentandStormwater/stormwater_design/index.aspx
• Design Guidance for Karst, Coastal, Urban/Redevelopment: Chesapeake Stormwater Network, Technical Bulletins: http://chesapeakestormwater.net/category/publications/csn-technical-bulletins/
Where To Find Design Resources: Pennsylvania
• Laws, Regulations, Permits: PA Department of Environmental Protection: http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/stormwater_management/21377
• BMP Specifications: PA Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual (Chapter 6.6.1, Constructed Wetland): http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/best_management_practices_manual/21383
• Design Guidance for Karst, Coastal, Urban/Redevelopment: Chesapeake Stormwater Network, Technical Bulletins: http://chesapeakestormwater.net/category/publications/csn-technical-bulletins/
Where To Find Design Resources: New York
• Laws, Regulations, Permits: NY Department of Environmental Conservation: http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/8468.html
• BMP Specifications: NY State Stormwater Management Design Manual: http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/29072.html
• Design Guidance for Karst, Coastal, Urban/Redevelopment: Chesapeake Stormwater Network, Technical Bulletins: http://chesapeakestormwater.net/category/publications/csn-technical-bulletins/
Webcast Resources • Virginia’s Stormwater Design Specification No 13: Constructed
Wetlands
• BMP Landscaping & Plant Lists (Appendix F from the WV Stormwater Manual) – Most of the different Bay State Stormwater manuals provide plant lists
• North Creek Nursery’s Landscape Plug Manual – can be purchased here: – http://www.northcreeknurseries.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/resources.li
nks/cat_id/15/index.htm
• Subsurface Gravel Wetland Design Specifications. UNH, 2009
• Stormwater BMPs in Virginia's James River Basin: An assessment of field conditions and programs. CWP, 2009
www.chesapeakestormwater.net
Please take a few moments to answer our 6 question survey to help us better serve your
needs in our 2014 webcast series.
We use this information to report it to assess our work, your needs and to report it to our funders
for future webcasts !
Evaluation
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/LX3KPBX