Stoiana Florentina
FACTOR ENDOWMENTS, INEQUALITY, AND PATHS OF
DEVELOPMENT AMONG NEW WORLD ECONOMIES
- Macroeconomics and Inequality-
Winter Term 2013-2014Presentation 30.01.2014
Stanley L. EngermanKenneth L. Sokoloff
1. Factor Endowments and the Colonial Economy2. Role of Institutions in the Persistence of Inequality3. The Extent of Inequality and Timing of
Industrialization4. Conclusions
CONTENTS
After the discovery of the Americas, it was difficult to organize at national government and private agents level
Central issue for all colonies was the labor supplyThe Spanish focused on the areas with the largest
concentration of native populationVery high number of migrants from Europe and
AfricaOver time, the fraction of slave migrants rose from
20% (prior 1580) to 75% ( 18th century)
1. Factor Endowments and the Colonial Economy
Share of migrants going to the Spanish colonies declined from 63.4% (16th century) to 13.3% (18th century)
Spain had great restrictions on who could go to the New World
By the 19th century, the populations of the New World consisted of a small percentage of people of European descent in Spanish America, whereas in the rest of the territories, the population was determined by the groups who immigrated at their respective rates of natural increase
Although there were high economic standard for Europeans, the colonies evolved dissimilar economic structures and institutions. They can be classified into 3 types of New World Colonies
1. Colonies with climates and soils that were well suited for the production of sugar
2. Spanish Colonies (silver and gold)
3. Northern part of the USA and Canada (independent proprietors, farmers)
extensive scale economies lacking economies of scale major economies of scale
overwhelming population and use of slaves
contact between natives and Europeans
laborers of European descent with similar, high level of human capital
extremely unequal distribution of wealth and human capital
unequal distribution of wealth
3*. The South and Argentina ( large landholdings, grain producers)
protection of the elite and restriction of the opportunities for the broad mass of population
elitist families kept their status over generations and wield political authority
many British migrants, lack of political institutions
2. Role of Institutions in the Persistence of Inequality• Because of soils, climates, size and density of native
population, there were also different degrees of inequality in wealth, human capital, political power, institutional and economic development
• Crucial institution: immigration (Spain gained a lot of Native American labor, whereas Britain had to settle for territories with few Native Americans, therefore encouraging slavery and immigration from all across Europe
• Land policy: Homestead Act of 1862 (USA), Dominion Lands Act of 1872 (Canada), Argentina and Brazil failed
Mexico had scarce good land and abundant labor forceThe lands were controlled by Native Americans but without
private property rights ( Ley Lerdo 1856, Porfirio Diaz)Schooling began being promoted in the 1870s in the British
Colonies, in Latin America only when the national government provided the funds
Banking and capital formation: loans among farmers and planters were common, they were also in credit and banking-like transactions
Separate chartering led to federal system: the central government defined the monetary standard and the state governments controlled bank formation and banking structure, soon followed by organizations of limited liability joint stock companies
In Latin America, the chartering of banks was controlled by the national government
3. The Extent of Inequality and Timing of Industrialization
• USA and Canada were characterized by relative equality in material living standards
• For sustained growth, new generation technologies were of great importance• Greater equality stimulates growth among early industrializers• Economic growth is seen as a cumulative impact of
incremental advances • The more equal economies were, the better chance they had to
realize economic growth• Agriculture and manufacturing increased substantially• The growth of inventive activity and technological discoveries
was strongly and positively associated with the extension of markets
All societies have had high levels of product per capitaTraditional explanations: national heritage, religionExplanations from the research: degree of inequality in
wealth, human capital, political power, promotion of immigration (except in Spain), implication of institutions
Differences lay in the initial FACTOR ENDOWMENT (suitability of the climate and soils and large concentrations of Native Americans)
4. Conclusions