STABILITY OF AN EQUATORIAL JET
AND THE FORMATION OF CYCLONE TWINS
by
Servando Marco Augusto De la Cruz-Heredia
A thesis subm itted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
Graduate Department of Physics University of Toronto
©Copyright by Servando Marco Augusto De la Cruz-Heredia (2000)
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
STABILITY OF AN EQUATORIAL JET
AND THE FORMATION OF CYCLONE TWINS
Doctor of Philosophy (2000)
Servando Marco Augusto De la Cruz-Heredia
Department of Physics
University of Toronto
Abstract
It has been observed th a t equatorial cyclone twins (ECTs), which may be a triggering
factor for El Nino events, are usually preceded by powerful jet-like westerly wind bursts.
These bell-shaped profiles are usually modelled (in a rather arbitrary manner) as being
Gaussian or sinusoidal in shape. These types of profiles are generally barotropically unstable
to infinitesimal perturbations in the most common linearized geophysical models, be they
quasigeostrophic, shallow water, or Boussinesq, but the structures of the instabilities are
very different from what would be required to trigger an ECT. A more generalized wind
flow, however, can lead to growing modes with symmetric lows across the equator that are
similar to ECTs. The instabilities may be understood in terms of the wave resonance theory,
in which neutral waves (which may be induced by shear, background vorticity, gravity, or
some other restoring mechanism) can phase-lock and grow in order to destabilize the flow.
ii
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Acknowledgements
Thank you Kent for the academic guidance and support, Hiro for the discussions,
CONACYT for the financial support, my father Servando for the physics, and above all my
mom M arta Irene for her unconditional love and encouragement. This thesis is dedicated
to her.
iii
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Contents
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Equatorial Cyclone T w i n s ........................................................................................ 1
1.2 The linear stability p ro b le m ..................................................................................... 15
1.3 Wave reso n an c e ................................................................................................................ 17
2 Overview of the models 20
2.1 Geophysical m o d e ls ......................................................................................................... 20
2.2 The Boussinesq m o d e l ...................................................................................................20
2.3 The Shallow-water m odel............................................................................................... 22
2.4 The Quasigeostrophic m o d e l ......................................................................................... 23
2.5 The Geostrophic momentum m o d e l ............................................................................ 25
3 Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewise linear
flows 28
3.1 The one-dimensional potential vorticity eq u a tio n .....................................................28
3.2 Some simple, stable flows on an /-p lane .................................................................. 30
3.2.1 Constant and Couette f lo w s ............................................................................. 30
3.2.2 A piecewise linear flow with a discontinuity in u<jyy ..................................32
3.3 Unstable waves in /-p lane QG th e o ry ......................................................................... 33
3.4 Wave-wave interaction: two wave resonance ............................................................40
iv
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
3.5 Three and four wave resonance .................................................................................... 46
4 Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numerically dis
cretized flows 53
4.1 Numerical approach to solving smooth p ro files .......................................................... 53
4.2 The hyperbolic tangent p ro file ....................................................................................... 54
4.3 The Gaussian j e t ...............................................................................................................65
4.3.1 The over-reflection m echanism ..................................................................... 66
4.3.2 The wave-resonance m ech an ism .................................................................. 67
4.4 The /3 e f fe c t .......................................................................................................................73
4.4.1 Rossby waves and stability c r i t e r i a ............................................................76
4.5 The Hyper-Gaussian je t on a /3 -p lane .........................................................................80
5 The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water and Boussinesq mod
els 88
5.1 Equatorial flows and the role of gravity w a v e s .........................................................88
5.2 Neutral waves in shallow-water theory ......................................................................89
5.2.1 Neutral modes on a shallow-water equatorial /3 -p la n e ................................90
5.3 Stability of an equatorial Hyper-Gaussian jet in sh a llo w -w a te r...........................94
5.4 The Boussinesq m o d e l ................................................................................................... 99
5.5 Neutral waves supported by the Boussinesq m o d e l................................................ 101
5.6 Rossby wave-Kelvin wave coupling ...........................................................................103
5.7 Stability of an equatorial Hyper-Gaussian j e t .......................................................... 117
6 Summary, conclusions and future work 126
A The Quasigeostrophic numerical eigenvalue problem 134
B The Shallow-Water numerical eigenvalue problem 137
v
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
C The Boussinesq numerical eigenvalue problem 143
vi
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
List o f Tables
3.1 Conditions for instability (Nondivergent, barotropic QG model) ....................... 39
vii
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
List o f Figures
1.1 Figures 1.1 to 1.3 illustrate the formation of equatorial cyclone twins. The
sequence shows the genesis of Typhoon Lola and Tropical Cyclone Namu
in 1986. Infrared images from May 14 (this figure), 17 and 19 are shown.
Underneath the clouds of this image the westerly wind bursts (WWBs) have
nearly peaked................................................................................................................... 2
1.2 On May 17 the cyclones reach tropical storm intensity while the WWBs
begin to wane................................................................................................................... 3
1.3 By May 19 the two well-defined cyclones are apparent.......................................... 4
1.4 A “composite” of ECT evolution (from Lander, 1990). Figures 1.1 to 1.3
correspond to stages 2, 3 and 4 shown here. Pressure troughs are indicated
with dashed lines, “C” shows the locations of subdepression strength vortices
while the zonal wind flow is represented by the wind barbs (1 barb = 5 m s-1). 5
1.5 Solution of the shallow-water equations given a symmetric heat source cen
tred a t the equator (from Gill, 1979). Figure (a) shows contours of vertical
velocity and the horizontal velocity field, while the contours in (b) represent
the perturbation pressure which is everywhere negative. The heating region
resembles the central elliptical contours in (a)......................................................... 8
viii
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
1.6 The top figure shows surface level pressure contours (in mb) for 00Z, May 10,
1986, while the bottom figure shows the wind field magnitude and direction
in m s_1. The westerlies have commenced and continue to intensify a t this
point. The wind fields in this and the three subsequent figures are shown a t
the 850 mb level (approximately a t 1500 m above sea level)................................ 9
1.7 Same as Fig. 1.6 but for May 14 a t 06Z. Note the strong westerly wind burst
located about the equator................................................................................................. 10
1.8 By 12Z on May 19 the cyclones have matured and are well-defined, while the
equatorial winds have already waned considerably......................................................11
1.9 Increase of the cyclones’ perturbation kinetic energy (in arbitrary units) be
tween May 10 and May 21, 1986. The e-folding time is approximately 70
hours.......................................................................................................................................12
1.10 Daily averaged zonal wind speed during May 1986................................................. 13
1.11 Equatorial cross-section of May 14 (Fig. 1.7) a t 155°E. Vertical axis is pres
sure in mb. Contours indicate the zonal wind speed in m s_I (westerlies are
positive).................................................................................................................................14
3.1 Stability of Rayleigh’s broken-line shear layer profile. P lot (a) shows the
growth rate while (b) indicates the phase speeds (the thick line represent the
phase speed of the unstable mode). The curves drawn with “+ ” and "
signs show the phase speeds of the neutral vorticity modes localized about
the “kinks” at y = ±d. Plot (c) shows the structure ('P field at t = 0) of
the fastest growing mode (dashed contours are negative), together with the
initial, zonally averaged Reynolds stress R and vorticity £ = ( ^ IX + '£yy)x-
The horizontal dotted lines indicate the position of the kinks. A schematic
of the flow ua(y) is shown to the far right of (c)......................................................... 35
ix
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
3.2 Instability due to the interaction between two phase-locked (or “resonant”)
waves (thick horizontal arrows denote the direction of propagation of a free
vorticity wave). Fluid displaced from the middle layer has anticyclonic
(clockwise) vorticity while the vorticity of fluid advected from the lateral
layers into the middle one is cyclonic (relative to the background). Together
with the vertical displacement of the interfaces [the vertical arrows denote
the positions of Vig maxima as given in (3.17)], the combined effect results
in the growth of the disturbance. As the kinks become further apart (for
a given wavelength) the interaction becomes very weak and eventually the
instability vanishes..............................................................................................................41
3.3 Difference energy of the two-kink profile (dotted line). E D [as evaluated
from equation (3.27)] vanishes in the region where the mode is unstable (for
k < 0.639 , cf. Fig. 3.1). The circles represent the sum of the difference
energies of the waves at each kink, E d+ + E D_ [equation (3.28)]...........................45
3.4 Stability analysis of a “triangular je t” . (a) Three neutral waves exist locally
about each kink, although the profile as a whole is unstable, as seen by the
growth rate curve (b). Plot (c) shows the phase speeds of both the three-
kiuk profile and the individual neutral modes: “o,” generated by
the isolated kinks a t d = —1,0 ,1 , respectively. Plots (d) and (e) show the
structures of the unstable and stable modes a t k = 1.23, respectively. . . . . 47
3.5 A “staircase” profile with four kinks. At higher k there are two modes of
equal growth rates and opposite phase speeds, while at the smaller wavenuru
bers the unstable modes possess the same phase speed b u t different growth
rates. The dashed and solid vertical lines indicate the positions (k = 0.70
and k = 0.045, respectively) at which the structures shown in Fig. 3.6 are
plotted....................................................................................................................................48
x
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
3.6 Plots (a) and (b) show the structures of the unstable modes generated by
the “staircase” profile a t k = 0.70. The mode shown in (a) propagates
towards the right with c = 0.42, while the other has the same growth rate
bu t c = —0.42. At a smaller wavenumber (k = 0.045) the phase speeds are
the same (c = 0), but the growth rates differ, with the most unstable mode
being shown in plot (c). Note the vertical scaling in (c) and (d) (blow-ups of
the mid-region are shown beneath each plot), and the fact th a t the Reynolds
stress becomes negative a t the middle of the channel................................................49
3.7 Structure of the unstable mode with c > 0 (a), and c < 0 (b), when k = 0.20. 50
3.S Multiple wave resonance in a three-layer How. Note the progression from two
isolated instances of Kelvin-Helmholtz instability a t each interface towards
the large scale instability in the final stages (from Sakai, 1997).......................... 52
4.1 Stability of a barotropic flow u0(y) according to the stability criteria in Ta
ble 3.1. The arrows indicate the intrinsic phase speeds of the shear modes.
Flow (a) is stable because u0yy < 0 for all y. and hence fails Rayleigh’s nec
essary criteria for instability. Similarly, u0yy > 0 in (6) and the flow is again
stable. In (c) there is an inflection point present (dashed line) but the flow
does not satisfy FjOrtfort’s criteria. The flow shown in (d) might be unstable
since there is an inflection point uoyy(!/c) = 0 and uayy{u - u{yc)) < 0 (from
Drazin and Reid, 1991)......................................................................................................55
4.2 Stability diagram for the tanh(at/) profile as a function of the shear (a) and
the channel width (26) when Uo = 1. Positive regions are unstable according
to equation (4.1)..................................................................................................................56
xi
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
4.3 Plot (a) shows the shape of the profile uo = tanh(y) (solid line) and its
second derivative (dashed line). The circles indicate the positions of the
sample points used by the numerical solver. The growth rate as a function
of wavenumber k is shown in (b) (for clarity, only positive growth rates have
been plotted), while the phase speeds between cT = —0.2 and 0.2 are shown
in (c) (see text for explanation of the markers). The darker dots represent
the phase speeds of the unstable modes. P lot (d) shows the structure of the
fastest-growing mode, together with the barotropic energy transfer and the
vorticity profile. The number of grid points was set to n = 400, and the
channel width to 20. All perturbation fields are assumed to vanish at the
walls........................................................................................................................................57
4.4 Same as Fig. 4.3 but using n = 14 grid points to solve the eigenvalue problem
(4.2). The markers “+ ” and indicate the location (in plot (a)) and
dispersion relationships (plot (c)) of the neutral waves generated by the kinks
as if they were isolated.......................................................................................................59
4.5 Same as figure (4.3) but using n = 50 (top four plots) and n = 51 (bottom
four)........................................................................................................................................61
4.6 The reason monotonic flows require two more inflections points for new insta
bilities to appear (as stated by the Balrnforth-Morrison criteria) is illustrated
above. While the flow pictured in (a) may be unstable, the number of un
stable modes will not change by adding an inflection point (b) since the
Doppler-shifting works against any new resonances taking place. Two more
inflection points (c) are thus necessary for new unstable modes to appear. . . 62
xii
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
4 .7 S ta b ility o f a G au ssian profile u o ( y ) = Uoe . P lo t (a) show s th e shap e
of the je t and details of the numerical sampling near the inflection points, (b)
shows the growth rate curves, (c) the phase speeds, (d) and (e) the structure
of the two most unstable modes a t k = 9.538 and k = 6.024, respectively.
Horizontal dotted lines in the Reynolds and vorticity diagrams indicate the
location of the inflection points........................................................................................64
4.8 The top figure shows the required wave geometry for over-reflection to take
place (after Proehl, 1996). The lower figure shows this geometry applied to
a barotropic Gaussian je t.................................................................................................. 66
4.9 Diagram showing the resonant waves generated by a Gaussian jet. The
crosses indicate the inflection points.............................................................................. 68
4.10 A piecewise linear “jet,” with the structure of the most unstable mode at
k = 0.837 shown in (d), and th a t of the peak secondary instability a t k =
0.784 in (e)............................................................................................................................69
4.11 Same as Fig. 4.10, but for a wider je t (structures shown a t k = 0.799)............. 70
4.12 A Hyper-Gaussian profile. Plot (d) shows the structure of the most unstable
mode a t k = 2.452. The secondary mode in (e) peaks a t k = 2.492.................. 72
4.13 Stability of a cosine jet. The structure of the only mode present is some
what similar to that of the most unstable Hyper-Gaussian mode shown in
Fig. 4.12(d), although only one maxima is present along the y direction. . . . 74
4.14 Same as Fig. 4.7 but for the lower half of the Gaussian je t .......................................75
4.15 Dispersion relationship cf the first ten Rossby waves in the absence of back
ground shear. The nondimensional width of the channel is 2b = 4, while
0 = 0.375, which represents a m id-latitude value of 1.5 x 10- n (m s)_1. . . . 78
xiii
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
4.16 Dispersion relation of a weak, westerly Hyper-Gaussian je t on a mid-latitude
/3-plane. When the shear is small (Uo = 0.01) the flow is stable and the
Rossby modes (of negative phase speeds) are only slighted affected.................. 81
4.17 A stronger Hyper-Gaussian je t (Uo = 0.1) leads to unstable modes, although
the lower Rossby modes can still be discerned. Close inspection at the the
lower critical wavenumber, however, reveals th a t the slower instability does
not bifurcate into a shear-deformed Rossby mode...................................................... 82
4.18 Eastward Hyper-Gaussian je t on an /-plane (to be compared with the /3-plane result
of Fig. 4.19). The scales used are the same as in Fig. 4.15. Each mode is
unstable for 0 < fc2 < k% where kc is the corresponding critical wavenumber. 83
4.19 Eastward Hyper-Gaussian je t on a /3-plane. Although the symmetric (and
most unstable) mode now presents a second critical wavenumber a t k =
0.668, it does not bifurcate into a Rossby mode..........................................................85
4.20 Structures of the unstable modes due to of a Hyper-Gaussian je t on a /3-
plane. The most unstable mode is pictured a t the top when k = 2.53. The
secondary mode peaks at k = 2.46 and is pictured a t the bottom ......................... 86
5.1 Neutral modes supported by the shallow-water model a t the equator (numer
ical solution). Note the appearance of boundary Kelvin waves propagating
westward with c = - 1 . These are due to the artificial walls required to
bound the numerical problem.......................................................................................... 92
5.2 Eastward Hyper-Gaussian je t on an equatorial /3-plane. While not all modes
have converged (see Fig. 5.3), it is useful to compare with the QG midlatitude
result shown in Fig. 4.19, for which the unstable modes present essentially
the same characteristics.....................................................................................................95
5.3 Same as the previous figure but using a high-resolution sparse calculation.
The number of interior grid points in this case was set to n = 10000................ 97
xiv
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
5.4 Structure of the most unstable (top) and the secondary (bottom ) modes at
k = 2.46 and k = 2.25, respectively. The contours represent isolines of hi,
while the plots labelled R and £ show the Reynolds stress and the vorticity. . 98
5.5 On a northern /-p lane (say) the most unstable unstable mode (pictured on
the top left) is symmetric and results from vorticity wave coupling, as does
the secondary mode shown to its right. The dynamics of the modes remain
unchanged when the flow is shifted to an equatorial /3-plane, and hence in
order to conserve the sense of rotation within the disturbance the signs of
the pressure perturbations must switch when crossing the equator (since
the sign of / changes). The most unstable mode is thus the antisymmetric
perturbation shown in the bottom left diagram........................................................ 100
5.6 Neutral modes supported by the nonhydrostatic Boussinesq model in an
equatorial channel 30km (top) and 10km (bottom) deep. Classification of
the modes is as in Fig. 5.1.............................................................................................. 104
5.7 A bounded piecewise linear profile with a shear discontinuity. The shears in
regions 1 and 2 are u ly and uly, respectively............................................................105
5.8 Nondimensional Boussinesq eigenvalue spectrum versus zonal wavenumber
when m = 10 k. Solid and dashed lines show the imaginary and real parts
of the frequency, respectively. Note the two regions of instability centred
approximately at k = 0.360 and k = 0.403................................................................ 108
5.9 The perturbation pressure (contours) and horizontal velocity (arrows) are
plotted for each of the unstable modes. The Reynolds stresses ( - (uv)xz (e,/e))
are shown to the right of the fields. The walls are located a t y — ± 1 .................109
5.10 Vertical perturbation velocities a t k = 0.360 (top), and k = 0.403 (bottom).
Note that in the top figure the flow a t midchannel is horizontally nondivergent.110
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
5.11 Nondiraensional eigenvalue spectrum versus zonal wavenumber when m —
10 fc, GM case. Solid and dashed lines show the imaginary and real parts of
the frequency. The values used were b = 1, ei = 0.2 and t i = 0.4. Compare
with the result from the Boussinesq model in figure (5.8)........................................113
5.12 “Decomposition” of the velocity profile shown in Fig. 5.7 into three simpler
flows......................................................................................................................................114
5.13 Frequency matching contours: (a) Kelvin wave at y = — b with the Rossby
wave at the kink (labeled K-R). (b) Both Kelvin waves (K-K). (c) Rossby and
Kelvin wave a t y = +b (R-K). The values chosen for the various parameters
are b = 1, ei = 0.2, and t i = 0.4. The dashed lines are the k-m ratios shown
in Fig. 5.11 and Fig. 5.15. They represent, from left to right, m — 10/;,
m = 5 k and m = 2 k ........................................................................................................ 115
5.14 Phase speeds of the three modes generated by the flows shown in Fig. 5.12.
The solid line is the Kelvin wave localized near y = 6, the dashed line shows
the dispersion curve of the Kelvin wave at y = - b, and the dotted line is
the phase speed of the kink-generated Rossby wave as a function of k. Here
b = 1, ei = 0.2 and t i = 0.4............................................................................................ 116
5.15 Comparison of the growth rates between the Boussinesq model (solid line),
and the GM model (dashed line) when m = 5 k (top) and m = 2 k (bottom ).
See also Fig. 5.13...............................................................................................................118
5.16 Growth rate contours in (k, m) space of an equatorial, Hyper-Gaussian je t
(Boussinesq model). Shading highlights the unstable regions. The top figure
shows the contours of the most unstable modes, while the bottom figure
shows the growth surface which lies underneath........................................................120
5.17 Growth rate and phase speed curves of the unstable modes generated by a
Hyper-Gaussian jet in the Boussinesq model when m = 0.......................................122
xvi
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
5.IS Structures of the two unstable modes a t m = 0. The instability pictured
a t the top peaks a t k = 2.42 and has a growth rate of Sj(o-) = 0.55. The
perturbation pictured on the bottom plot corresponds to the secondary mode.
It was calculated a t k = 2.38 and possesses a nondimensional growth rate
of a = 0.46. Dotted lines indicate the position of the inflection points at
±516 km from the equator. For visualization purposes only the central part
of the channel is shown, since the total width is 14 (in nondimensional units). 123
5.19 Same as Fig. 5.17 but with m = ir................................................................................ 124
5.20 Structures of the two unstable modes a t m = tr. The most unstable mode
(top) peaks a t k = 2.40 and has a growth rate of cr = 0.44. The secondary
instability pictured on the bottom plot was calculated a t k = 2.19 and pos
sesses a growth rate of cr = 0.29.....................................................................................125
B .l Numerical procedure used to determine the stability of an eastward Hyper-
Gaussian je t on an equatorial /3-plane using the shallow-water model. The
squares represent the coarse guesses (using 100 grid points) obtained by
solving the nonsparse eigenvalue problem (B.2) using a QR algorithm. The
three most unstable modes (tagged ) are saved and used as seeds for the
sparse solver. The results, using 10000 grid points, are tagged here as “0 ” .
These latter values are then chosen to begin a dense trace along k, using a
result a t point fc; as a guess for point i. The trace is also performed using
10000 grid points and the resulting curve is plotted above with dots . . . 141
xvii
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1 Equatorial Cyclone Twins
Figures 1.1 to 1.3 show the remarkable formation of a cyclone pair which took place
during the month of May in 1986. The sequence of infrared satellite images begins on May
14 with the presence of an unorganized convective cloud complex along the equator between
150°E and 170°E. In the lower troposphere powerful westerly winds bursts (WWBs)1 blow
during these periods with an average zonal speed of 10 m s-1 in a jet-like fashion, with a
peak speed of nearly 25 m s-1 with respect to the background flow. A cyclonic circulation
forms in each hemisphere between 5 and 8 degrees to the north and south of the equator.
The wind bursts continue to intensify during the next couple of days until on the 16 and 17
the cyclones reach tropical storm intensity. By then the equatorial convection has collapsed
while the equatorial westerlies weaken as the cyclones mature. The westerlies continue to
wane and by the 19 the twin cyclones are well-defined and slowly begin to travel westward.
At this time the southern cyclone begins to abate, and by the 21 it has nearly vanished.
The northern storm then continues its journey westward and towards the pole.
1 Westerlies flow eastwards, while easterlies flow from east to west.
1
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 1. Introduction 2
Figure 1.1: Figures 1.1 to 1.3 illustrate the formation of equatorial cyclone twins. The se
quence shows the genesis of Typhoon Lola and Tropical Cyclone Namu in 1986. Infrared
images from May 14 (this figure), 17 and 19 are shown. Underneath the clouds of this
image the westerly wind bursts (WWBs) have nearly peaked.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 1. Introduction
Figure 1.2: On May 17 the cyclones reach tropical storm intensity while the WWBs begin
to wane.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 1. Introduction
Figure 1.3: By May 19 the two well-defined cyclones are apparent.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 1. Introduction 5
STAGE 1
VV'f;-._c
STAGE 2
-EQ.
STAGE 3
- v * t'- - ~ V EQ.
STAGE 4
9 ' : / /
-EQ.
Figure 1.4: A “composite” of ECT evolution (from Lander, 1990). Figures 1.1 to 1.3 corre
spond to stages 2, 3 and 4 shown here. Pressure troughs are indicated with dashed lines,
“C” shows the locations of subdepression strength vortices while the zonal wind flow is
represented by the wind barbs (1 barb = 5 m s_1).
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 1. Introduction
Although the previous paragraph specifically details the cyclogenesis of Typhoon Lola
and Tropical Cyclone Namu in 1986, the above evolution, pu t forth by Lander (1990), also
describes a composite of the formation of various equatorial cyclone twins (ECTs) (see
Fig. 1.4). The occurrence of storm pairs varies depending to the definition, but according
to the one by Lander2, their frequency in the Western Pacific ocean is approximately once
every 2 to 5 years (Nieto Ferreira et al., 1996). The suspicion th a t ECTs may be a by
product of the WWBs has been present in the literature (Lander, 1990; Hartten, 1996),
but so far there do not seem to be any thorough studies regarding this particular link. The
importance of WWBs and ECTs has been highlighted in the past few years due to their
apparent relation (possibly causal) to the occurrence of El Nino. The El Nino phenomenon
has been extensively described in the literature (Philander, 1983; Ramage, 1986), and has
gained recognition due to its widespread effects (droughts in Asia and the collapse of the
Peruvian fishery, among many others) (Wyrtki, 1975). A “typical” El Nino event takes
place every 2 to 7 years and is characterized by a large tongue of particularly warm water
propagating westward from the coasts of Ecuador and Peru. The anomalous temperature
rise exists for about a year accompanied by a weakening (and sometimes reversal) of the
easterly trade winds in the western Pacific (Cane et al, 1986). These trade winds, called the
Walker Circulation, form a zonal cell consisting of low altitude easterlies which rise in the
North Australian-Indonesian Low Pressure Zone and become westerlies a t high altitudes,
sinking later upon reaching the South-east Pacific High Pressure Zone. The disruption of
the Walker Circulation is actually a precursor to an El Nino (although it does not necessarily
imply th a t one will take place), and it has been suggested th a t the ECTs resulting from the
21) Twin cyclones form nearly simultaneously.
2) They form a t about ±5 degrees about the equator.
3) They form along the same longitude
4) Their wind, pressure, and cloud patterns are nearly symmetrical with respect to
the equator.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 1. Introduction 7
ensuing WWBs may trigger the event (Keen, 1982; Ramage, 1986). ECTs have preceded
most El Nino events (Ramage, 1986), including those th a t took place in 1986-87 (shown in
Figs. 1.1 to 1.3 and Figs. 1.6 to 1.8 below), and 1991-92 (Nieto Ferreira et al., 1996).
Studies regarding the formation of ECTs have mostly focused on the effects of heat
ing. Gill (1979) used a linearized shallow-water model to study how a resting atmosphere
responds to a heat source located at the equator. In order to model convection in the ide
alized system mass was extracted from the flow, and analytical time-independent solutions
were found. When the heat source is symmetric with respect to the equator two lows form
to the north and south of the forcing, as shown in Fig. 1.5. Nieto Ferreira et al. (1996)
later solved a similar problem using a nonlinear shallow-water model on a sphere assuming
a time-dependent heat forcing (with similar spatial structure), and again symmetric lows
appeared a t ±9° of latitude. The resulting cyclones, however, were rather weak (peak winds
of less than 9 m s-1), and the heat sources invariably generate an ECT [as opposed to the
more common single-cyclone events (Hartten, 1996)]. As with Gill’s study, no background
WWBs were present.
Figure 1.6 shows the surface pressure and 850 mb horizontal wind fields from the NCEP
reanalysis on May 10,1986. A t this point the westerly wind bursts have already commenced
and four days later the strong gusts are still apparent (Fig. 1.7). By the 19 the cyclone pair
is clearly discernible while the westerlies have begun to weaken considerably. The growth
of the storms can be clearly seen in Fig. 1.9, which shows the change in the eddy kinetic
energy density over a box which surrounds each cyclone. This growth is roughly exponential
(with an e-folding time of approximately 70 hours), and although the central pressures dip
only to about one thousand millibars (approximately 12 mb below the surrounding surface
pressures), the peak wind speeds rise above 20 m s-1 , the threshold of hurricane intensity
(Saffir-Simpson hurricane scale, Beven 1999).
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 1. Introduction 8
( a )
■-10
(b)
Figure 1.5: Solution of the shallow-water equations given a symmetric heat source centred
a t the equator (from Gill, 1979). Figure (a) shows contours of vertical velocity and the
horizontal velocity field, while the contours in (b) represent the perturbation pressure
which is everywhere negative. The heating region resembles the central elliptical contours
in (a).
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 1. Introduction 9
1014
Figure 1.6: The top figure shows surface level pressure contours (in mb) for 00Z, May 10,
1986, while the bottom figure shows the wind field magnitude and direction in m s-1.
The westerlies have commenced and continue to intensify a t this point. The wind fields
in this and the three subsequent figures are shown a t the 850 mb level (approximately
a t 1500 m above sea level).
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 1. Introduction 10
Figure 1.7: Same as Fig. 1.6 but for May 14 a t 06Z. Note the strong westerly wind burst
located about the equator.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 1. Introduction 11
1004
Figure 1.8: By 12Z on May 19 the cyclones have matured and are well-defined, while the
equatorial winds have already waned considerably.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Eddy
ki
netic
en
ergy
(a
rbitr
ary
units
)
Chapter 1. Introduction 12
day
— Northern cyclone EKE— Sou thern cyclone EKE300
250
200
150
100
Figure 1.9: Increase of the cyclones' perturbation kinetic energy' (in arbitrary units) between
May 10 and May 21, 1986. The e-folding time is approximately 70 hours.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 1. Introduction 13
Figure 1.10 shows the averaged3 zonal wind speeds from the NCEP reanalysis during
the month of May. At the sta rt of the month the usual easterlies are present, but by
May 9 the flow reverses and on May 16 the average wind speed is 6 m s ' 1. Typhoon
Lola reaches tropical storm intensity a t th a t point, followed by the appearance of Tropical
Cyclone Namu the next day. Afterwards the winds quickly wane so th a t by the end of
the month the easterlies have resumed. Figure 1.11 shows the structure (latitude/height
i
oNto><
Date (May)
Figure 1.10: Daily averaged zonal wind speed during May 1986.
cross-section) of the WWB in Fig. 1.7. It has the form of a localized je t about the equator,
confined to the lower troposphere. The zonal wind speed at its core is approximately
20 m s " 1 towards the east, the je t being embedded in a westward flow which possesses a
speed between 10 and 6 m s-1 . It is the purpose of this thesis to study the possible role of
3Spatial average is taken within a “corridor” containing the je t, located between 5°N and 5°S, 120°E
and 170°E, and from 300 to 1000 mb.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 1. Introduction 14
20S 15S 10S 5S EQ 5N 10N 15N 20N
Figure 1.11: Equatorial cross-section of May 14 (Fig. 1.7) a t 155°E. Vertical axis is pressure
in mb. Contours indicate the zonal wind speed in m s_1 (westerlies are positive).
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 1. Introduction 15
westerly wind bursts in the cyclogenesis of equatorial cyclone twins. As can be seen from
Fig. 1.11 the shape of the WWB suggests modelling the burst as a bell-shaped je t confined
to the troposphere. We shall thus take into account the finite depth of the flow in order
to analyze the effect it has on the stability of the profile. The focus will be concentrated
on barotropic jets (background flows whose velocity is solely dependent on latitude) with
varying degrees of curvature in the vicinity of the je t maximum.
In order to attem pt to understand the mechanism behind the initial formation of a pair
a linear analysis is carried out. Although finite in depth the je t will be assumed to be
zonally infinite and stationary (the average strength of the je t increases by about 15% in
the three days previous to the appearance of the cyclones). Emphasis will be placed on the
dynamics from a “wave resonance” perspective, as explained in Section 1.3.
1.2 The linear stability problem
In order to elucidate the manner in which a given flow may become unstable4 a series of
assumptions are made, starting with the choice of a suitable model of the flow's behaviour
(which simplifies the problem at the expense of eliminating some physical processes). If
one further assumes th a t the fluctuations which initially take place are small compared to a
time-independent basic state, the model can then be linearized and the resulting equations
become even simpler. The problem is now reduced to determining whether a small wave
like disturbance will grow in time (i.e. become unstable) given a certain basic flow which
resembles one found in nature.
Unfortunately the stability of even simple flows in idealized fluids usually poses ana
lytically intractable problems. In these cases the most common approach is to solve the
problem numerically, a procedure which often involves spatial discretization of the flow
4 We shall confine our attention to normal modes.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 1. Introduction 16
fields. An example of this methodology is given in Appendix A. Briefly, the basic flow
and the perturbation’s as-yet-to-be-determined structure are sampled by a certain num
ber of grid points. This leads to an eigenvalue problem which, if sta ted in m atrix form5,
can be solved by various methods, such as the application of certain transformations (e.g.
“QR m ethod”), or through iterative techniques such as the “power method” . Each have
their own particular weaknesses and strengths: transformation methods are usually ro
bust numerically and provide the full eigensolution a t the expense of high computational
and memory consumption (which can severely limit the resolution, for example, Moore
and Peltier (1987), Yamazaki and Peltier (2000b)), while iterative procedures tend to be
resource efficient but only provide partial solutions and convergence is more uncertain.
Since it is not clear, a ■priori, how many grid points will be required in order for the
solution to converge, a combination of both methods is sometimes useful. “Convergence”
in this la tte r context does not refer to the result of a given numerical procedure, but to the
determination of the “true” dynamics of the perturbed flow. The solution has converged
when an increase in the resolution (i.e. number of grid points) no longer changes the
result. This usually implies solving the eigenvalue problem, doubling (say) the number of
sample points, and repeating the procedure until there are no noticeable differences between
two subsequent iterations. O ther factors, such as the necessity of probing wider domains
for infinite flows (which must be artificially bounded in order to be solved numerically),
also affect convergence. We’ll call this situation “physical convergence” , to distinguish it
from the “numerical convergence” mentioned in the previous paragraph. The underlying
physics, unfortunately, is usually obscured by the above numerical details. It is here the
wave resonance theory may be of most use, as seen below.
5Solving the differential equation can be achieved in other ways, e.g. by means of a Runge-Kutta
algorithm, o r by spectral methods which also require solving an eigenvalue problem (Moore and Peltier,
1990).
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 1. Introduction 17
1.3 W ave resonance
The idea of instability as the product of the “resonance of waves” has been mostly
developed in the last twenty-five years or so (Yih, 1974; Cairns, 1979; Ripa, 1982; Hoskins
et al., 1985; Hayashi and Young, 1987; Fabrikant and Stepanyats 1998), although the notion
was present as far back as Taylor (1931). The basic idea is as follows: we consider th a t the
energy of a perturbed flow E p is given by the sum of the energy of an undisturbed state
Eu plus the energy of any disturbances th a t may be present E d s o th a t E p = Ep + E D. If
there are no external forces (dissipative or otherwise), then conservation of energy requires
that modes with nonzero E d must be stable, otherwise they cannot be excited without
changing the to tal energy of the system. Hence only disturbances for which E d = 0 can
amplify spontaneously6. When waves having difference energies of the same magnitude but
opposite signs interact while remaining stationary with respect to each other (phase-locking
through Doppler shifting), the possibility of instability arises since the resulting difference
energy is zero.
The above theory has been applied to various hydrodynamic problems with notable suc
cess. Satomura (1981a), for example, analyzed the stability of a nonrotating, shallow-water
Couette flow, and noted th a t gravity modes could somehow “mix” in order to produce
unstable modes. Satomura, however, did not seem to be formally aware of the wave reso
nance idea until a subsequent note (Satomura, 1981b). Hoskins et al. (1985) offered a clear
picture of Rossby wave locking when discussing shear instabilities. Some time later Sakai
(1989) applied the theory to a two-layer model on an /-p lane. Vertical shear in this case
provided the necessary Doppler shift for Kelvin and Rossby waves to phase-lock and create
an unstable mode. Kobayashi and Sakai (1993) studied the barotropic stability of zonal
6The quantity E d has been given various names in the literature, the most common ones being “pseu
doenergy,” “wave energy,” “disturbance energy” and “difference energy,” among others. We shall use the
latter (Iga, 1993).
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout perm ission.
Chapter 1. Introduction 18
and meridional flows confined near a wall on a /3-plane. They attribu ted the instability of
the lower half of a sech2(y) je t to the coalescing of the two continuous modes nearest to
the inflection point (the continuum having been discretized by finite differentiation). Iga
(1993) later reanalyzed Orlanski’s problem and described the resulting instabilities in terms
of resonances between various Rossby and gravity waves. He also noted th a t the resonance
Sakai (1989) described was actually between a Rossby wave and a mixed Rossby-gravity
wave. Furthermore, Iga seems to have encountered, bu t not fully explained, an instance
in which four modes could resonate in order to generate a single instability. Baines and
Mitsudera (1994) presented a clear dynamical picture, similar to Batchelor’s description
of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability (Batchelor, 1967), regarding the stability of a piece-
wise linear profile with two discontinuities in the background vorticity field (Gill, 1982).
Kushner et al. (1998) studied a horizontally bounded Couette flow comparing various fluid
dynamics models (semigeostrophic and the full Euler equations amongst them), and found
weak Kelvin wave-Kelvin wave coupling.
One advantage of the wave resonance formulation is th a t it is possible to gain insight into
the instabilities th a t may arise in a given flow by simply analyzing the neutral modes which
its various geometric components (walls, velocity discontinuities, etc.) can individually
support. These depend on the model with which the flow is being analyzed. A wall,
for example, does not contribute any extra dynamics in quasigeostrophic theory, but can
support the presence of boundary-trapped Kelvin waves in models which capture those
waves (Allen et al, 1997). If the Doppler shift provided by the background flow causes the
frequencies of two counterpropagating waves to match, these might then phase-lock and lead
to an unstable mode. Since it is usually simpler (and sometimes even analytically possible)
to obtain localized solutions of the neutral modes, one can then determine the approximate
location of unstable regions in wavenumber space by superimposing the dispersion curves.
Furthermore, simply adding the neutral fields can also provide a crude idea of what the
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 1. Introduction 19
resulting unstable disturbance will look like, and allows one to understand the dynamical
processes responsible for the instability.
From this perspective the progression from the more complex models (e.g. Boussinesq)
towards the simpler ones (e.g. quasigeostrophic) simply involves the subsequent filtering of
neutral modes which in turn limits the number and nature of the wave resonances which
can take place. In this thesis we will systematically analyze the linear stability of simple
one-dimensional flows which vary solely in the meridional direction, i.e. the basic velocity
field is purely barotropic. Chapter 2 provides a brief overview of the models which will be
used. Chapters 3 and 4 deal with the stability of quasigeostrophic and barotropic flows.
The former chapter focuses on piecewise linear flows which provide a simplified picture of
the dynamics behind the wave resonance mechanism, while the la tter extends the concept
to smooth, numerically discretized flows. In Chapter 5 the stability of models which can
support gravity waves is studied. The shallow-water barotropic je t is analyzed and, since
no assumptions are made with respect to the magnitude of the Coriolis parameter, the flow
can now be shifted towards the equator. The second half of the chapter continues with
a further generalization provided by the Boussinesq equations, and focuses on the effect
of changing the depth of the domain within which the flow takes place. Rossby wave-
Kelvin wave resonance is analyzed in detail. A summary and final conclusions are given in
Chapter 6.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 2
Overview of the m odels
2.1 G eophysical models
The first step towards solving the stability problem requires modelling the flow in a
manner which simplifies the governing equations while retaining the dynamical aspects
relevant to the problem at hand. Sound waves, for example, are not expected to play a
role in the relatively slow, large-scale motions which interest us, and hence we can dispense
of this extra complexity by assuming the flow to be Boussinesq. Subsequent assumptions
then lead to the various models described in this chapter.
2.2 The Boussinesq m odel
We begin by considering a Boussinesq, inviscid and adiabatic flow on a /3-plane, that
is, a flat, ro tating frame of reference such that the planetary vorticity / = 2Qsin(0) varies
linearly with latitude (£2 is the earth’s angular velocity). The momentum equations are:
Du 1 dp ( .m - f v = -=P e-x’ (2' la)
20
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 2. Overview of the models 21
% + f u = - i f , (2.1b)Dt pay
(2-ic)Dt p o z p
while mass conservation for an incompressible flow:
S +S +£=°’ ^requires th a t
~ = ( 2 -l e )Dt
where (x, y, 2) represents the zonal, meridional and vertical directions, the respective ve
locity components being (u , v, w). Time, pressure, and gravity are denoted by t, p = p(z) +
p ( x ,y , z , t ) , and g, while the Coriolis param eter a t latitude y takes the form / ( y ) — f t + fa y
on a coordinate system centred about yi . In accordance to the Boussinesq approximation
the density p = p + p(x , y, z, t) is assumed constant except when it gives rise to buoyancy
forces in the vertical momentum equation.
The above system can be linearized by assuming th a t time-dependent motions are depar
tures from a steady background flow, and as such we can expand the fields in the following
manner:
y7 = yro(y,z) + eJ7l ( x , y }z , t ) , (2.2)
where e < 1 and l^ol ~ |^ i |- By substituting the fields in the form (2.2) into system
(2.1) and assuming a basic flow ( u o , V o , W q ) = (u o ( y ) , 0 , 0) we obtain, a t 0 ( t ) , the following
linearized equations
dudt
1 dui ( du0\ 1 dpi . .= (2'3a)
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 2. Overview of the models 22
(2.3b)
(2.3c)
du\ dv\ dwid x dy dz
(2.3d)
(2.3e)
where N is the Brunt-Vaisala frequency:
N 2 = _ 9 ^ P o ~ p dz
2.3 The Shallow-water m odel
By assuming th a t the fluid is in hydrostatic balance and th a t the density is constant we
immediately obtain, from (2.1c):
If we consider the undisturbed depth of the fluid layer to be h{x, y, t) integration of this
last equation yields
Substituting (2.5) into (2.1a) and (2.1b), and assuming th a t the horizontal velocities
u and v do not depend on depth (Pedlosky, 1987) results in the horizontal momentum
equations:
P = ~P9Z + pah- (2.5)
(2.6a)
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 2. Overview of the models 23
dv dv dv . dh ,0 . . .— + u — + v — + f v = - j t - (2-6b)dz oy dy
Since u and v are independent of z equation (2.Id) can be immediately integrated (over
a flat bottom surface) to yield
— - ( ! +s ) ’ <">which, combined with the vertical speed of the free surface
dh dh dh
Y t + U d i + VY
gives:
. Ull UU Utl ,rt“ L=/l = -57 + “ 5Z + t' ^ ( )
dh , 8{uh) , d(vh) _ n ^¥ + ~ a ^ + _aT ~°- ( }
The shallow-water equations can then be linearized by employing an expansion similar
to (2.2) but with no vertical variation, resulting in the following system a t 0(e):
dudt
i, i du i ( r dun\ dh\ \t +u^ - { f - W Vl = - g^ (2-10a)
(2.10b)dvi dvi dhi_ + Uo_ + M = _9_ ,
a/ii , a/ii dui , a(«i/i0) ,o in „,~dt ° Y ^ 0 &T “ a^ - " (2' 10c)
2.4 The Quasigeostrophic model
We can readily render system (2.1) dimensionless by means of the following scaling:
p + W i U L ) / ( g H ) ] p
1-4 L x 1 1-4 (L/U) t / - +
1-4 Ly (u,v) 1-4 U (u ,v ) p 1-4
^ H z w M- (UH/L) w p 1-4
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 2. Overview of the models 24
If we define the Rossby number Ro = U/{feL) the non-dimensional system becomes:
RoTTt-!v = - \ % (2'Ua)
R oi r t + f u = - W y (2' Ub)
Dt
? + ? + ? = 0’ <2-lld)o x oy oz
g = 0. (2.1Ie)
Expanding the fields in a power series of the Rossby number,
T = F g + R o T a + 0 ( R o 2), (2.12)
shows th a t a t 0 (1 ) the flow is geostrophic and hydrostatic:
’■ - i - » . - t ’ » - & ■
and hence the horizontal geostrophic velocity is nondivergent, allowing us to substitute pg
for the streamfunction Expanding in a Rossby series and substracting 3(2.11b)/cte from
3(2.11a) /d y (using (2.l id ) , (2.13), and hence the fact th a t wg vanishes at first order) yields,
a t 0 ( R o ),
V3t d x d y d y d x ) \ d x 2 dy2 dz ’ '
where the last term on the lhs can be written in terms of $ by substituting an expansion
for p of the form (2.12) into (2.11e) so th a t a t 0{Ro) we have:
( d 3 $ 3 d<$ d \ d 2<S> „ „( a t + dx dy dy d x ) d z2 + Wa ~ ’ ^
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 2. Overview o f the models 25
where B = ( ( H N o ) / f e L ) 2 is a stratification parameter called the Burger number (N o = N
is assumed constant). Equation (2.14) thus becomes
d d * d d $ d \ ( d 2<$ d2<£ , , a \ _ nd t + ^ T y - ^ d i ) { d * + W d * + P ty ) - ° ’ (2'16)
which is the quasigeostrophic potential vorticity equation. Linearizing about a purely
barotropic zonal flow u0(y) finally yields:
( d W , - . A V a f , ( . d?u0\ _
The quantity within the second parenthesis is the perturbation potential vorticity (later
labelled “Q ”), while the rightmost parenthesis contains the meridional gradient of the
potential vorticity of the basic sta te IIy. Note that the nondivergent limit can be obtained
by letting B -+ oo, and the above reduces to the barotropic equation. Although this latter
case is valid a t low latitudes the vertical structure of the flow no longer plays a role in the
dynamics, an aspect which will be of importance later on when dealing with flows of finite
depth.
2.5 The Geostrophic m om entum m odel
Let us return momentarily to our original nonlinear, dimensional Boussinesq system
(2.1). Splitting u and v into a sum of geostrophic and ageostrophic components (but not
assuming th a t the la tter are necessarily smaller), we have th a t the geostrophic velocities
are
P -18 .)
" • — m (2I8b)
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 2. Overview of the models 26
which upon substitution into equations (2.1a) and (2.1b) give:
^ - f v + f v g = 0, (2.19a)
^ t + f u - f u 9 = 0. (2.19b)
The ageostrophic parts are thus (making V = ( 1 / /) D/Dt):
ua = - V v , va = Vu ,
and hence solving for v and u in (2.19) yields
v = vg + V u = vg + Vug - V 2 v , (2.20a)
u = ug — V v = ug — Vvg — V 2u. (2.20b)
The geostrophic momentum approximation assumes th a t (Hoskins, 1975)
V 2u <S u, V 2v v,
so th a t the terms which are differentiated twice are ignored, and thus the resulting horizontal
momentum equations become
Assuming the flow to be hydrostatic we obtain, upon linearizing, the geostrophic momentum
model:
dulgdt
duig ( du0\ 1 dpi
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 2. Overview of the models_____________________ 27
d v \ g d v \ g . 1 d p I /n n n L \_ £ + tl0_ + /tI1 = _ _ _ (2.22b)
^ = - p ig , (2-22c)dz
^ i + ^ + 5 l = 0, (2.22d)o x oy oz
dpi■ + U0~ - - ^ N 2WX = 0, (2.22e)
where
dt dx g
1dpi
p d y ’
1 9pip d x '
(2.22f)
(2.22g)
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3
Stability in the quasigeostrophic
model: resonance in piecewise linear
flows
3.1 The one-dim ensional potential vorticity equation
We shall first analyze the neutral modes which the quasigeostrophic (QG) model can
sustain. Unlike stable (unstable) modes whose amplitude decreases (increases) with time,
neutral waves oscillate without growth or decay. In the derivation of the QG vorticity
equation (2.16) some types of waves have already been eliminated due to the simplifications
made, such as the filtering of sound waves by the incompressibility assumption. Gravity
waves (whose restoring force is provided by g) have also been filtered through the time
scaling which eliminates the higher frequency modes.
We begin by considering a perturbation streamfunction which has the form1 (dropping
Ut is understood th a t physical quantities will be obtained by taking the real part of the fields.
28
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewise
where c = a / k and a y subscript denotes differentiation with respect to th a t direction.
Recall th a t these equations are non-dimensional and th a t Uo = Uoiy)- For the above to
must be constant. This leads to the following eigenvalue problem for the vertical structure
function 4>:
where the boundary conditions are obtained by requiring th a t wa vanish at the horizontal
walls which bound the flow vertically. Note that on an /-p lane all rotational and stratifica
tion effects are encompassed by the Burger number. If the flow is nonrotating or infinitely
stratified (so th a t no vertical motion is possible), then m = 0 and the perturbation is purely
barotropic2.
The potential vorticity equation governing the flow becomes
where we have defined the “equivalent” wavenumber y 2 = k2 + m2. Since m does not
appear anywhere else in the equation it is clear th a t the vertical structure can be taken
background shear. The perturbation has a baroclinic structure determined by (3.3) and thus becomes a
purely barotropic mode when m — 0 (Pedlosky, 1987).
linear flows 29
the subscript):
(3.1)
so th a t substitution into equation (2.17) yields
hold for all y a t a given zonal wavenumber k each of the grouped terms over the braces
= ~ m 2/p{z), (3.3)
(3.4)
2The basic flow uQ(y) is barotropic since instability can take place solely as a result of the horizontal
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 30
into account by simply solving the purely barotropic case (i.e. the nondivergent limit for
which to = 0), but using p instead as an equivalent zonal wavenumber. The solutions of
equation (3.4) with the appropriate boundary conditions provide the meridional structure
of perturbations which propagate according to (3.1). All other perturbation fields can be
then calculated thereof.
3.2 Some simple, stable flows on an /-p lan e
In general it is not possible to analytically solve equation (3.4) for an arbitrary shear
flow, but we shall now look at two simple cases for which fS = 0. The vorticity equation
can then be written as follows:
(u0 - c) (ipyy - /i2V>) - Uoyyip - 0. (3.5)
3.2.1 C onstant and C ouette flows
We consider first the simplest case, th a t of a constant zonal flow independent of y. We
have, for this case:
(u0 - c) (iiyy - n2i/S) = 0. (3.6)
Except for the singular mode which results when c = uo (see below), there are no solutions
to the differential equation which satisfy the boundary conditions, and hence no other
modes are present.
For the case of Couette flow, i.e. constant shear uo{y) = Uqyy, we obtain the following:
(u0yy - c) (tpyy - y?ip) = 0. (3.7)
As before, there are no solutions which satisfy the boundary conditions unless uoyy — c = 0
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows ____________________________________ 31
(i.e. a t a critical point), in which case the above becomes
ipyy - y 2ip = 6 ( y - c/uoy) = S(y — d), (3.8)
which has solutions of the form
4>(y) = j Q(y,y')S{y'- d ) d y '= Q{y,d), (3.9)f-b
where Q is the Green’s function
\Qi (y ,d) - b < y < dG(y,c) = \ (3.10)
(ff2(y.c') d < y < b ,
which satisfies
Qyy - = 0, y # c', (3.11)
and which must vanish a t the boundaries. Together with the jum p conditions (Arfken,
1985):
lim Gx(y,d) = lim S2(!/>c')>y->c_ y-*c’+
lim 4-G i(y ,d ) - lim ^ -Q i(y ,d ) = - 1 , y-*c:+ ay y-*c'_ dy
we find that:
! smh(fi[b — y])sinh(fi[b + c / u 0y])/(fi.sin\i(2iib)), c /u 0y < y < b
sinh(/i[i> + y]) sinh(/i[6 - c/noJ)/(/rsinh(2/r6)), —b < y < c /u 0y.
Case (1960) was the first to analyze this continuum of modes in a Couette flow by solving
the initial-value problem. Tnese singular perturbations are neutrally stable3, and their
phase speeds lie between the minimum and maximum values of the background flow speed.Solving the initial-value problem as Case did actually shows th a t the perturbations vanish algebraically
as 1 /i or faster as t oo. The mode continuum, however, completes the normal mode solution.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewise linear flows________________________________________________________________32
3.2.2 A p iecew ise linear flow w ith a d iscontinu ity in uo,jy
The third case involves a piecewise linear profile of the form
Uoj, V, 0 < y < b ,u 0(y) = U 0 + <
~ b < y < 0,
where denotes the constant shear in each region. In addition to the homogeneous
boundary conditions a t ±6 we require th a t the geostrophic and ageostrophic components
of the pressure and meridional velocity be continuous, so that
[*]»=o = 0 (3.12)
and4
' d'S ( d d \ 3® 9® duay dx + + U° d x ) dy dx dy
Here [C]y=yo = C(yo+0) — C(i/0 - 0 ) denotes the “jum p” of the bracket contents C a t y = j/o-
Recall also th a t we have assumed zero p. The streamfunction which is a solution of the
potential vorticity equation and which satisfies the above continuity conditions is
4 , ( y ) = - L ( e M H i i l ) _ e - * ( M y l > ) _ ( 3 1 4 )
where the dispersion relationship
a = U„fc - ~ f a i - O k (3 15j2/i (e"6 + e -"1) ' ' '
= 0. (3.13)y = 0
4The first continuity condition may be strengthened by requiring th a t the normal displacement
%){x, y, z, t) of any point across the interface be unique (Chandrasekhar, 1981). Since
ihty = i ^ ( n ) c o s ( \ / I f n 2 )e , | i l " 'Tl) = d%)/dt + u0 d Z ) /d x = ik (u 0 - c)2) =
ifc(uo - c)tj(y) cos(y /B m z) ,
we obtain:
[?]y=0 = - c)}y=Q = 0.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 33
must be obeyed. This is a type of vorticity mode located about the “kink” , and therefore the
presence of walls has little effect on the perturbation (note th a t there is no quantization).
W hen b oo, we simply obtain:
If u~ > u* the wave propagates sinusoidally to the left. The meridional velocity of the
interface is
which is 1/4 of a wavelength ahead of the amplitude of the displacement.
3.3 U nstable waves in /-p lan e QG theory
In general the presence of a nonuniform background flow u0(y) leads to the possibility of
instability, th a t is, the solution of the potential vorticity equation (3.4) may yield complex
eigenvalues which in turn give complex frequencies of the form a = crr 4- icq. Upon substi
tution into equation (3.1) the perturbations with positive (negative) cq will grow (decay)
exponentially in time. If <q = 0 the flow is said to be neutrally stable.
The above condition must be used when the basic flow velocity is discontinuous a t y = 0, but otherwise it
is equivalent to (3.12). Regarding the second condition, one can write (3.5) as (Drazin and Reid, 1991):
((no - c)'Pi - - /I2 (uo - C) Ip = 0,
so th a t integrating between - e and +e and then letting e -* 0 yields
t ( u 0 - c ) V > s - t l 0 j , V ’ ] ! < = 0 = 0
which is equivalent to (3.13) (with >3 = 0).
tp(y) — e (3.16a)
(3.16b)
= k e - ^ cos( y / B m z )dx
(3.17)
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 34
As an example consider the following piecewise linear profile:
■Uoyd, d < y < b
u o{y) = ' uqyy, —d < y < d (3.18)
—UQyd, —b < y < —d,
where u 0y is the constant shear of the flow between —d and d. Solving the vorticity equa
tion and applying the appropriate continuity and boundary conditions yields a dispersion
relationship for the resulting mode
ff2 = < fc2 + e4M + 2e- ^ i _ 2e-2 - e- 4"A‘ + e"4"*2 -4/i2e4 d (1 — e~Atlb) V
4 /id [e4"1' - /ide4*"' - e~2t,A' - e ' 2 + e + / id e -4" ^ ] ) ,
where A n = b — nd. In order to simplify the result we shall assume th a t the channel width
is infinite, so th a t when An —» oo the above becomes
n UL k 2a 0 y *
4 / i 2■ ( ( 1 - 2 / i d ) 2 - e - W ) ,
and the streamfunction is
where
ip{y) = A e ~ ^ +d' +
u0y(k/ij.)e
(3.19)
(3.20)
(3 .2 1 )B 2 (a + uoykd) — uoy(k/t i)’
As can be seen in Fig. 3.1(a), when /id < 0.639 the frequency is purely imaginary, and the
mode is unstable. Note th a t the growth rate is given by
£7j = kd{jl) = ( f i 2 - m 2) ‘ /2 Cj(/Li), (3.22)
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 35
0.3
0.44o3
-0 .4- 0.2
-CU-0 .3 . 0 .4 0.6 0.80.2 0.4 0.6 1 0.2
+d
- d
kx
Figure 3.1: Stability of Rayleigh’s broken-line shear layer profile. P lot (a) shows the growth
rate while (b) indicates the phase speeds (the thick line represent the phase speed of the
unstable mode). The curves drawn with “+ ” and signs show the phase speeds of
the neutral vorticity modes localized about the “kinks” a t y = ±d. Plot (c) shows
the structure ('F field at t = 0) of the fastest growing mode (dashed contours are
negative), together with the initial, zonally averaged Reynolds stress R and vorticity
£ = ( ^ XI + ^yy)x . The horizontal dotted lines indicate the position of the kinks. A
schematic of the flow u0(y) is shown to the far right of (c).
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout perm ission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 36
and hence the maximum growth rate occurs when m = 0, i.e. when the perturbation is
purely barotropic5.
Rayleigh (1896) was the first to analyze this problem in the nondivergent case. Clearly
the existence of the instability depends on the presence of the shear Uoy within the flow.
The reason for this can be seen by studying the energy transfers which are taking place, i.e.
multiplying the linearized potential vorticity equation (2.17) by pvt and integrating over
over z and y (recalling th a t the normal velocities vanish at the boundaries) yields:
where ( )x represents the zonal average along a latitude circle. T he quantity in left paren
thesis is the total perturbation energy E\y, and hence the lhs of the above equation is the
rate a t which the total energy of the disturbance (per unit zonal length) changes in time,
while the rhs represents the source of energy, which depends critically on the horizontal
shear of the mean flow (the term -within parentheses on the right is called the Reynolds
stress). Insight with respect to the importance of the shear can be further gained from
Howard’s semicircle theorem (Pedloslcy, 1987), which provides bounds for the phase speed
and growth rate of a disturbance in a two-dimensional flow uo(y,z):
min(uo) < c;- < max(n0),
ci — ^ (max(uo) — min(u0))2 .
5Note tha t, although mathematically equivalent to solving the divergent problem with the “composite wavenumber” p , the nondivergent version of the potential vorticity equation (3.4) becomes the 2D Euler
equation (Landau and Lifshitz, 1987), and hence the applicability of the theory presented here extends
beyond the confines of the geophysical flows we are analyzing.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout perm ission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 37
Again, if there is no shear present (either horizontal or vertical), then max(uo) = min(iio)
and the flow is stable. Clearly the presence of horizontal shear is a requirement for
barotropic instability, albeit a rather weak one and, as the Couette flow demonstrates,
it is not a sufficient condition. Rayleigh (1880), however, obtained a stronger criteria by
substituting complex solutions of the form c = c, + iCi and iji = ijir + ifa into equation (3.5)
and finding the conditions under which c; ^ 0, namely, th a t Uoyy change sign at some point
yc w ithin the domain of the flow. Taylor (1915) provided a physical explanation for this in
terms of the rate of change of s-momentum of a vertical slab of fluid (parallel to the x-z
plane, of thickness 6y),
where 2)o is the original position of the fluid particles within the layer (before the distur
bance). Instability takes place if the quantity inside the parentheses is positive, but if u0yy is
everywhere positive (negative) then all layers gain (lose) momentum, which cannot happen
if the flow is inviscid. Thus u0yv must change sign for the flow to be unstable. Fjprtoft (1950)
strengthened this condition (Drazin and Reid, 1991) by showing th a t uoyy(u - u(yc)) < 0
somewhere within the flow was a necessary condition for instability. Kuo (1949) made the
generalization of Rayleigh’s criteria to a /3-plane and concluded th a t in order for the flow to
be unstable ^ — u0yy must change sign somewhere in the domain (or, conversely, a sufficient
condition for stability is th a t the sign remain unchanged). Although Kuo claimed that this
condition was also sufficient for instability, it was later shown th a t this was not the case
(Howard and Drazin, 1964). Pedlosky (1964) generalized Fjortfort’s criteria to a /3-plane,
and later Ripa (1982) obtained the more general stability conditions for a one-layer model
on a /3-plane which encompassed all previous necessary conditions in the nondivergent limit
(q.v. Section 5.2.1).
A necessary and sufficient condition for instability was obtained by Rosenbluth and
Simon (1964) for monotonic flows with a single inflection point a t yc and zero /3. Writing
;PoUoyySy
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 38
the vorticity equation (3.5) in terms of the meridional displacement 1) (see footnote 4) gives
Noting th a t rj must vanish a t the walls we have that for p = 0 the eigenvalue problem
becomes
decreases. Thus, if the flow is stable when p = 0, it will be so for all p, and hence the
c traces a semicircle over the upper half of the complex plane. Using this methodology the
following necessary and sufficient condition for instability is obtained6:
where V denotes the Cauchy principal value.
Generalizations of the stability criterion (3.25) had not been forthcoming until recently,
when an extension to monotonic flows with more than a single inflection point was derived
by Balmforth and Morrison (1999). Using again the Nyquist m ethod they arrived a t the
following necessary and sufficient condition for instability:
6There is a typo in the original paper, where the exponent of u0w is incorrectly stated as 3 instead of 2.
Furthermore, the condition remains valid for walls located arbitrarily a t 6_ and 6+ (6+ > 6_), as long as
the flow is monotonic and has a single inflection point between them.
Lin (1955) has shown th a t if the flow in question is unstable then C; will increase as p2
importance of analyzing the above case. By Nyquist’s theorem the number of zeros of the
gain function is determined by the number of times a plot of ®(c) encircles the origin when
uov(y) M v c ) - M y ) )l
^yy{y)i>(y,Vo)
where xjj(y, yc) is the solution of the Fredholm problem
■^yy(y')xl>{y' ,yc)dy' ■
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 39
Table 3.1: Conditions for instability (Nondivergent, barotropic QG model)
Condition Type 0 Profile [0 = 0)
uo,jy changes sign N A rbitrary
uosy{u — n(f/c)) < 0 somewhere N Arbitrary
0 - uoy,j changes sign N A rbitrary (0 ^ 0)
ua(0 - uoyy) > 0 somewhere N A rbitrary (0 ± 0)
N, S uoy > 06UOy(Uo(yC)-U0) |6_ Uqy(uO-Uo(yc))
r 1 UOyyWtKy,Vc)j..^ ,J - i M ’j)-Mvc) ” N, S U 0 y > 0
°N = necessary, S = sufficient ^Single inflection point
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 40
Unfortunately the above calculation makes the evaluation of the stability criteria somewhat
more involved than in the previous case. However, by analyzing the number of times a locus
encircles the origin in the Nyquist plot (which determines whether there is instability or
not), the authors note that, given N inflection points in the profile, there can be a t most
(iV + l ) /2 unstable modes at a given wavenumber k. Two more inflection points are thus
required if a new instability is to appear. The stability criteria mentioned so far have been
summarized in Table 3.1.
3.4 Wave-wave interaction: two wave resonance
From the criteria mentioned in the previous section it is clear th a t shear (and, in par
ticular, a t least one inflection point within the flow) is critically im portant for instability
to be able to take place in an inviscid fluid. The mechanism by which the perturbation
sta rts to grow to destabilize the flow, however, has been subject to extensive discussion in
the literature. One of the foremost theories on the problem has been the idea of instability
as the product of the “resonance” between waves, as explained below.
We shall first analyze flows which take place on an /-p lane so as to eliminate any 0-
Rossby waves. The vorticity modes which result will thus be a product of the background
shear gradient, easily isolated when said gradients are discontinuous (with otherwise linear
shear). We consider a piecewise linear profile with two kinks described by equation (3.18).
The structure of the instability is shown in Fig. 3.1c. Two vortices appear within half a
wavelength, each centred a t the latitude of a kink, and shifted with respect to one another
so th a t the streamlines tilt opposite to the inclination of the shear. The Reynolds stress,
labelled R in the figure, is constant within the shear region, while the vorticity plot £ clearly
shorvs two peaks, each located a t a kink in the background velocity field.
The mechanism by which the instability develops can be understood in terms of vorticity
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 41
Figure 3.2: Instability due to the interaction between two phase-locked (or “resonant” )
waves (thick horizontal arrows denote the direction of propagation of a free vorticity
wave). Fluid displaced from the middle layer has anticyclonic (clockwise) vorticity while
the vorticity of fluid advected from the lateral layers into the middle one is cyclonic
(relative to the background). Together with the vertical displacement of the interfaces
[the vertical arrows denote the positions of ui9 maxima as given in (3.17)], the combined
effect results in the growth of the disturbance. As the kinks become further apart (for
a given wavelength) the interaction becomes very weak and eventually the instability
vanishes.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 42
advection, and has been successively clarified by Hoskins et al. (1985), Baines and Mitsudera
(1994), and Heifetz et al. (1999). The instability arises due to the combined effect of the
two sinusoidal waves which counter-propagate along the shear discontinuities according
to equation (3.19). This superposition of waves can be clearly seen by comparing the
neutral mode from equation (3.16a) with the unstable solution (3.20). W hen the modes
become stationary with respect to one another (due to the Doppler shift), the meridional
displacement [given by equation (3.17)] and the advected vorticity act in tandem to make
the disturbance grow7. The velocity matching is highlighted in Fig. 3.1(b) which shows the
phase speeds of the unstable mode and the neutral waves. Figure 3.2 schematically details
the mechanism of the instability.
Integrating the energy equation (3.23) by parts over y and noting th a t v lg vanishes at
the boundaries gives the rate of change of the wave energy E\V'.
We can write the linearized potential vorticity equation (2.17) in the following manner:
3 — ■£Where Q is the perturbation potential vorticity and FI is the potential vorticity of the basic
state. Since
P (*xQ)x = P <«x (^xx + - m2* ) )x
we can thus obtain an equation in terms of the potential vorticity
7Hoskins et al. (1985) elegantly summarized the instability mechanism in the following sentence: “The
induced velocity field o f each Bossby wave keeps the other in step, and makes the other grow
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 43
Substituting the meridional displacement 2) into the potential vorticity equation (3.26)
yields the following relationship
Ed
The quantity within the parentheses is the difference energy' which must vanish if the
mode is to be unstable8 (Hayashi and Young, 1987). Since E w is positive definitive this
implies th a t
9n „u o w - > 0 dy
somewhere in the domain is a necessary condition for instability (see Table 3.1).
Consider the case of the shear profile with two kinks as given in equation (3.18) when
b oo (an infinitely wide channel). For simplicity we shall set the flow to be nondivergent.
If we assume th a t the kinks are far apart, solving locally yields a solution like th a t of the
8Equation (3.27) simply provides an expression for the difference energy in terms of the streamfunction
and particle displacements. Although consistent with the fact th a t E d m ust vanish for the mode to become
unstable, the requirement itself is obtained by the condition th a t the total energy of the system remain
constant i.e. E p - E u = 0.
from where
and thus
(3.27)
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows___________________________________________ 44
isolated kink [equation (3.16a)], so th a t the difference energy for each mode becomes:
+ \ (pH) J <2)±)x u0{y) u0yy(y) dy,
where
_ e - k \y ^ d \ g i(kx -c rt)
= ±U0yd =F
and thus,
E d ± = ( j e 2kly* dl + y e “ l9=F‘' 1) d y + ^ Y ( ^ ) ^ u °y a > = ± i
= ^ f c ( l - 2 M ) ,
so th a t upon “superposition” of the modes the total difference energy is
E d+ + E d_ = pH k (1 - 2kd) (3.28)
which vanishes when
k d =2
This is also the phase-speed matching condition where c+ = c_, which lies near the growth
maximum of the a-k plot [Fig. 3.1(b)], A plot of the difference energy of the two-kink
profile is shown in Fig. 3.3, which shows that E d vanishes in the region where instability
takes place. Although simply adding the difference energies of each modes is but a crude
approximation of the to tal difference energy, the quantity E d+ + E d. is zero at k ss 0.5,
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 45
near the growth rate maxima. This type of analysis thus allows to determine where in
wavenumber space instability may arise and also elucidate the mechanism (e.g. vorticity
advection between phase-locked vorticity waves) behind the instability.
0.2
0.1
- 0.1
Q
- 0.2
-0 .3
- 0 .4
-0 .50 .70.1 0 .3 0 .4 0.5
k0.60.2
Figure 3.3: Difference energy of the two-kink profile (dotted line). E d [as evaluated from
equation (3.27)] vanishes in the region where the mode is unstable (for k < 0.639 , cf.
Fig. 3.1). The circles represent the sum of the difference energies of the waves a t each
kink, Ep+ + E d- [equation (3.28)].
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 46
3.5 Three and four wave resonance
In the light of the “wave resonance” interpretation the structure of the double kink
profile in Fig. 3.1(c) can be attributed to the phase-locking of two vorticity waves, each
identified by the localized train of pressure variations a t y = ±1. In this context it is clear
th a t the presence of walls (which in QG theory do not support any waves) has no further
effect except th a t of inhibiting instability. A flow of the form
is stable no m atter what the values of the constants ujf are, either because the waves’ phase
speeds cannot possibly match if the shear slopes are of the same sign, or because the total
difference energy cannot vanish when the slopes have opposite signs.
Figure 3.4 shows the “triangular je t” first analyzed by Rayleigh (1880) and discussed
by Hayashi and Young (1987) as a simple example in order to illustrate the wave resonance
mechanism. Due to the symmetry of the profile the dynamics in this case are actually more
involved than what was suggested in the original analysis. The waves located at y = ±1
propagate in the same direction and possess identical Doppler shifts relative to the middle
mode, so th a t their (isolated) dispersion curves (tagged “+ ” and “—” ) exactly overlap in
plot (c). The phase speeds of all three waves m atch a t k = 1.50, near the wavenumber of
maximum growth rate (k = 1.23). The resulting instability is thus the simultaneous reso
nance of all three modes, as can be seen from the structure of the perturbation in plot (d).
The mode is symmetric about the y = 0 latitude, and resembles two overlapping instances
of the shear layer profile in Fig. 3.1, albeit shifted apart in the y direction. The previous
statement also applies to the Reynolds stress R, which now remains constant throughout
the entire — 1 < y < 1 region. The vorticity profile shows three peaks, one a t each kink,
{v - <0 d < y
— d < y < d
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 47
(a)
(c)
(b)0.4
0.2
- 0.2
-0.42.50.5
k(d )
0.5
-0.5
0.5 2.5k
kx
5
•5
Figure 3.4: Stability analysis of a “triangular je t” , (a) Three neutral waves exist locally
about each kink, although the profile as a whole is unstable, as seen by the growth
rate curve (b). P lot (c) shows the phase speeds of both the three-kink profile and the
individual neutral modes: “o,” “+ ,” generated by the isolated kinks at d = —1,0,1,
respectively. Plots (d) and (e) show the structures of the unstable and stable modes at
k — 1.23, respectively.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 48
where the neutral modes would be localized. This overall behaviour is to be expected since
the triangular profile itself can be viewed as the superposition of two meridionally shifted
shear layer flows, such as the one described by Eq. (3.18). The remaining neutral mode in
plot (e) is a stable combination of the modes at y = ±1 . These resonances can be easily
split by destroying the symmetry, where changing the value of the northern shear creates
two distinct modes generated by the pairings ( - , o) and (+ , o).
(c)
Figure 3.5: A “staircase” profile with four kinks. At higher k there are two modes of equal
growth rates and opposite phase speeds, while a t the smaller wavenumbers the unstable
modes possess the same phase speed but different growth rates. The dashed and solid
vertical lines indicate the positions (k = 0.70 and k = 0.045, respectively) a t which the
structures shown in Fig. 3.6 are plotted.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows
- 101-10 kx
-6 0-6 0
55i — I
Figure 3.6: Plots (a) and (b) show the structures of the unstable modes generated by the
“staircase” profile a t k = 0.70. The mode shown in (a) propagates towards the right
with c = 0.42, while the other has the same growth rate but c = -0 .42 . At a smaller
wavenumber (k = 0.045) the phase speeds are the same (c = 0), but the growth rates
differ, with the most unstable mode being shown in plot (c). Note the vertical scaling in
(c) and (d) (blow-ups of the mid-region are shown beneath each plot), and the fact that
the Reynolds stress becomes negative at the middle of the channel.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 50
As the number of kinks increases so does the complexity of the interactions. Consider
a “staircase je t” such as the one pictured in plot (a) of Fig. 3.5. Two distinct regimes can
be seen from both the growth rate curve pictured in plot (b), and the phase speeds shown
in (c). W hen k > 0.078 there are two unstable modes which possess the same growth rates
but phase speeds of opposite sign, while at smaller wavenumbers the two growth rate curves
“unfold” and the phase speeds of both unstable modes become equal. P lot (a) in Fig. 3.6
shows the structure of the mode propagating towards the right a t k = 0.702. Although the
vorticity is somewhat affected by the presence of the lower shear layer, the streamfunction
is very similar to that of a profile with two kinks such as the one in Fig. 3.1, with the
Reynolds stress constant in the 1 < y < 2 shear layer. We a ttribu te the appearance of
this mode to the resonance of the neutral waves which counterpropagate about the kinks
a t y = 1,2, as can be seen from the crossing of the corresponding phase speed curves at
k = 0.9 and c = 0.6 in Fig. 3.5(c). Similarly, the unstable mode which propagates towards
the left, shown in Fig. 3.6(b), is mostly confined to the —2 < y < - 1 band, and is due to
the resonance between the neutral waves localized a t y = —1, —2.
-10 -10
Figure 3.7: Structure of the unstable mode with c > 0 (a), and c < 0 (b), when k = 0.20.
Plots (c) and (d) in Fig. 3.6 show the structures of the modes at k = 0.045. Note that
the meridional extent has been increased in the figures since the perturbations are no longer
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 51
confined to narrow bands about each pair of kinks. Regions in which the Reynolds stress
is negative appear when — 1 < y < 1, and correspond to the sections of the disturbance for
which the streamlines have a positive slope (i.e. the same tilt as the background flow). This
“energy' sink” is most notable in the weaker instability pictured in plot (d). In these cases the
resonances are not so clear-cut since Reynolds stresses and vorticity spikes simultaneously
appear in the regions - 2 < y < — 1 and 1 < y < 2. Figure 3.7 shows an intermediate step
between small and large wavenumbers (k = 0.20). Consider the mode in plot (a) which
propagates towards the right. Here a local maximum appears about y = — 2 where the
southernmost kink is located, and becomes more prominent as k decreases. The overall
effect is th a t the instability begins to resemble th a t of a single shear layer with kinks a t
y = ±2. The phase speeds of the “outer” neutral modes tagged “A” and “V” cross at
k ~ 0.4, and hence the long-wave unstable modes can be attribu ted to the resonances
between these two waves modified by the presence of the internal vorticity discontinuities.
Figure 3.8 shows an example of how multiple wave resonance might look like in a three-
layer flow. While the disturbances here are of finite amplitude and mixing is clearly taking
place, it can nonetheless aid in visualizing the mechanism behind three wave resonance. A
container holding three liquid layers of slightly different densities is tilted and a vortex sheet
is created a t each of the two interfaces. The mechanism behind the localized instabilities is
essentially the limit of vanishing d in Fig. 3.1 (Baines and Mitsudera, 1994). Although the
density is not the same for all the layers, the mechanism by which the instability takes place
is attributable to the shear (Drazin and Reid, 1991). The two small-scale disturbances grow
and propagate locally in opposite directions a t similar speeds, reflecting the conditions at
k = 0.70 in Fig. 3.5(c). In the final stages the two disturbances seem to phase-lock to create
the large-scale mode as in part (c) of Fig. 3.5 when k < 0.05.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 3. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in piecewiselinear flows 52
f t l f i t T " * "
Figure 3.8: Multiple wave resonance in a three-layer flow. Note the progression from two
isolated instances of Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at each interface towards the large
scale instability in the final stages (from Sakai, 1997).
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4
Stability in the quasigeostrophic
model: resonance in num erically
discretized flows
4.1 Num erical approach to solving sm ooth profiles
Piecewise linear barotropic profiles are highly idealized, and are not really intended to
represent actual physical flows. Atmospheric and oceanic currents can be modelled more
appropriately by the use of smooth profiles, such as a cosine je t (Yanai and Nitta, 1968),
or a Gaussian je t (Marinone and Ripa, 1984). While still unrealistic, such flows can begin
to approach what is observed in Nature. Even simple shear flows u0{y), however, lead to
analytically intractable problems when substituted into the QG potential vorticity equation
(3.4), a situation which worsens considerably with the more sophisticated models. Ways
of numerically solving the equations of motion have been discussed in Section 1.2, and
detailed descriptions of one particular methodology (via m atrix methods) is given in the
appendixes. The underlying physics, however, is usually obscured by the numerical details.
53
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 54
It is here where the wave resonance theory may be of most use. By simply being aware
of the neutral waves which the model can support (in the absence of any basic flow) one
may conjecture the possible resonances th a t could take place, and even determine the most
likely regions (e.g. in wavenumber space) in which instability may take place.
Consider, for example, the simple /-p lane quasigeostrophic flows shown in Fig. 4.1. Dis
cretization of these flows will generate shear modes propagating in the directions indicated
by the arrows. If there is no inflection point present [Fig. 4.1(a) and Fig. 4.1(b)] then no
resonance can take place and the flow is stable in accordance with Rayleigh’s criteria (see
Table 3.1). Flow (c) presents an inflection point, but the Doppler shift acts against the
phase-locking of the counterpropagating modes. Rayleigh’s criteria is satisfied but Fjortoft’s
is not and hence the flow is stable. Only for flow (d) can resonance take place, but it’s
not guaranteed by any of the simple criteria mentioned above — the Rosenbluth-Simon
condition (3.25) must be evaluated.
4.2 The hyperbolic tangent profile
Consider the following smooth profile:
u0(y) = Uo tanh(aj/), —b < y < b .
This flow satisfies Rayleigh’s inflection point criteria (since uaw changes sign at y = 0), but
th a t in itself is no guarantee of instability. Applying the stronger stability criterion (3.25)
to this flow yields the following condition for instability
4a6 + e2ab - e~2ab______________ 2____________2aUo aUj] tanh(a&) ( l — tanh2(ai>))
A contour plot of the lhs of the above equation is shown in Fig. 4.2. As the shear becomes
more pronounced (large values of a), the above condition is satisfied for very narrow chan-
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 55
(a) (b)
( d )
M v )
(c)
Figure 4.1: Stability of a barotropic flow u0(y) according to the stability criteria in Table 3.1.
The arrows indicate the intrinsic phase speeds of the shear modes. Flow (a) is stable
because uoyy < 0 for all y, and hence fails Rayleigh’s necessary criteria for instability.
Similarly, Uom > 0 in (6) and the flow is again stable. In (c) there is an inflection
point present (dashed line) but the flow does not satisfy F jortfort’s criteria. The flow
shown in (d) might be unstable since there is an inflection point Hora(j/c) = 0 and
UQyy{u — u(yc)) < 0 (from Drazin and Reid, 1991).
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 56
2 .5
j-20 .5
a-10
-5 0
32 2.51.510.5
Figure 4.2: Stability diagram for the tanh(oy) profile as a function of the shear (a) and the
channel width (26) when Uo = 1. Positive regions are unstable according to equation
(4.1).
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 57
nels. This is to be expected as in the limit of infinite a the flow becomes a vortex sheet for
which a = ± i k , i.e. it is always unstable independent of the width of the domain.
(c)0.2
k x R fi.
Figure 4.3: P lot (a) shows the shape of the profile uo = tanh(y) (solid line) and its second
derivative (dashed line). The circles indicate the positions of the sample points used by
the numerical solver. The growth rate as a function of wavenumber k is shown in (b) (for
clarity, only positive growth rates have been plotted), while the phase speeds between
cr = —0.2 and 0.2 are shown in (c) (see text for explanation of the markers). The darker
dots represent the phase speeds of the unstable modes. P lo t (d) shows the structure of
the fastest-growing mode, together with the barotropic energy transfer and the vorticity
profile. The number of grid points was set to n = 400, and the channel width to 20. All
perturbation fields are assumed to vanish a t the walls.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 58
The hyperbolic tangent profile has been studied in detail by Michalke (1964). Although
analytical solutions to this problem have not been found, it is possible to numerically solve
the vorticity equation in order to study the stability of the flow. Following Appendix A
we can write equation (3.5) in m atrix form (for simplicity we shall consider the purely
barotropic case):
[u0 (fc21 - dL2)) + Dg>u0] ip = c (fc2 X - dL2)) ip. (4.2)
By the stability criteria (3.25) an unbounded flow of the form Uo = tanh(y) should be
unstable. Although infinite domains are not numerically feasible1, the walls may be located
far enough so as not to affect the stability of the flow. The dispersion relationship and the
structure of the fastest growing mode is shown in Fig. 4.3. A plot of the phase speeds is also
shown in part (c) of the figure. In this case setting the walls a t b = ±10 gave the same result
as b = ±20, and thus the domain was considered wide enough to be “infinite” . Increasing
the meridional resolution from 400 to 800 grid points did not lead to any noticeable changes,
and hence we assume th a t the problem has “physically converged” . The maximum growth
rate occurs a t fc = 0.44, and the longwave cutoff takes place a t fc = 1 (this cutoff can be
determined analytically by solving the neutral case for which c* = 0). The phase speeds
are symmetric about cr = 0 and vary from - 1 to 1 (the region has been trimmed in the
p lo t). The markers “+ ” and ” trace the dispersion relationships of the waves generated
by the two kinks adjacent to the inflection point on either side (see below).
In order to understand what the numerical solver is doing we begin by analyzing the
results obtained when the resolution is very low. Figure 4.4 is identical to Fig. 4.3 except
th a t in this case the number of interior grid points has been set to n = 14. In addition,
two curves (“+ ” and “—”) have been plotted in part (c). These represent the dispersion
relationships of the isolated waves generated by the potential vorticity discontinuities (the
XA change of variables may sometimes be introduced in order to bound the region (Michalke, 1964).
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 59
-0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5•1.5 •1«o(y)
1.50 0.5 1
Figure 4.4: Same as Fig. 4.3 but using n = 14 grid points to solve the eigenvalue problem
(4.2). The markers “+ " and " indicate the location (in plot (a)) and dispersion
relationships (plot (c)) of the neutral waves generated by the kinks as if they were
isolated.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout perm ission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 60
kinks) which are created due to the discretization. The kink generating each wave can be
identified by comparing the markers in subplots (a) and (c).
There are various features to note about this last result. Even at this low resolution
the unstable mode has been fairly well captured. The shortwave cutoff is now located at
around fc ~ O.S instead of k = 1, although the most unstable wavenumber is located a t
the appropriate wavelength (fc = 0.44). Its structure is shown in subplot (c) and discussed
below. Comparing the neutral dispersion relations to the full eigensolution it is possible
to identify the modes which resonate. We thus note th a t the instability is caused by
the resonance between the (modified) “+ ” and ” waves generated on each side of the
inflection point. Although the dispersion curves of all the kink-generated modes intersect
a t sufficiently small fc when taken in isolation, it is the two modes which are nearest to the
inflection point which most closely follow the curves th a t actually coalesce. Twelve more
eigenvalue curves are clustered near c = ±1, corresponding to the remaining grid points
within the flow (whose neutral dispersion curves are not shown). The structure of the most
unstable mode is shown in Fig. 4.4(d), together with the barotropic energy' transfer and the
vorticity profile. Note th a t the streamfunction resembles the result shown in figure (3.1c)
for the two-kink piecewise linear profile.
Comparison with the result in Fig. 4.3 suggests that in spite of the increase in resolution
the mechanism by which the instability takes place does not change, i.e. the vorticity waves
generated by the kinks nearest to the inflection point resonate and begin to grow. It is,
in essence, a modified version of the two-kink profile. The influence of the other kinks,
however, is also an integral part of the resulting dynamics, since they all contribute to
the to tal difference energy'. The overall effect seems to be th a t of having two “composite”
waves, each grouped together by the sign of the curvature of the flow. This also explains
why a change in sign in uoyy is required for the flow to be unstable: the curvature of the
flow determines the propagation direction of the waves which must reverse a t some point in
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 61
-0.S 0 O.S 1.5•1.5
(b )
R (i,k x
(b )
k x R
Figure 4.5: Same as figure (4.3) but using n = 50 (top four plots) and n = 51 (bottom
four).
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 62
order for resonance to take place. The above arguments are very similar to those given by
Baines and Mitsudera (1994) for arbitrary profiles, although the view presented here stems
from a numerical standpoint. Furthermore, they help obtaining an intuitive understanding
of the requirement that, given a monotonic flow with an inflection point, two more inflection
points are necessary if a new instability is to appear (see Section 3.3). This stems from the
fact th a t any neutral modes arising from a single inflection point will be Doppler-shifted
against any possible phase-locking. At least one more inflection point is required if new
resonances are to take place, as seen diagrammatically in Fig. 4.6.
Figure 4.6: The reason monotonic flows require two more inflections points for new insta
bilities to appear (as stated by the Balmforth-Morrison criteria) is illustrated above.
While the flow pictured in (a) may be unstable, the number of unstable modes will not
change by adding an inflection point (b) since the Doppler-shifting works against any
new resonances taking place. Two more inflection points (c) are thus necessary for new
unstable modes to appear.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 63
One obvious difference between low and high resolution results is the shape of the
vorticity profile. The double “hump” obtained when n — 400 is absent since the dip at
y = 0 is missing. This is an im portant feature since the vanishing of the vorticity at
the inflection point in this case can be easily shown analytically. The relation between
the vorticity 5 and the streamfunction for the nondivergent flow is readily obtained as
follows:
„ = 9 ^ #■£= " d x2 + dy2
= - (fc2^ - ipyy) ei{kx- ° l).
Since E = £(y) e'!*1-"*) We find that, using (3.5),
f = - (/c2^ -
=u0 - c
so th a t the vorticity of the unstable mode vanishes a t the inflection point (since uo —c yf 0).
Given an even number of grid points it is seen th a t the values of £ nearest to the inflection
point slowly begin to decrease as n grows. If the number of grid points is odd, so th a t the
inflection point is sampled in the discretization, the vorticity vanishes a t it should a t y = 0,
but the shortwave cutoff is notably underestimated (see Fig. 4.5). In order to explain this
behaviour we note th a t the difference energy of the mode at y = 0 (marked with circles ( “o”)
in the plot) is zero, and hence does not actually participate in the resonance. The resonating
modes, however, are further apart, and the net effect is similar to th a t of decreasing the
resolution. When the number of grid points is sufficiently high, however, both “even” and
“odd” samplings give the same result, i.e. the problem physically converges.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 64
0.5
-0.5,
(a)
x ^2
X 1.5
S 1a
0.5
00.5Mv)
(c )
fc(d)
0.64i
0.62
0.58'
fc
0.5
-0 .5
0.5
-0.5
Figure 4.7: Stability of a Gaussian profile wofe) = Uoe~(y/T'>2. P lot (a) shows the shape
of the je t and details of the numerical sampling near the inflection points, (b) shows
the growth rate curves, (c) the phase speeds, (d) and (e) the structure of the two most
unstable modes at k = 9.538 and k = 6.024, respectively. Horizontal dotted lines in the
Reynolds and vorticity diagrams indicate the location of the inflection points.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 65
4.3 T he Gaussian jet
Bell-shaped jets are a common feature in the atmosphere (e.g. the strong “west wind
bursts” which occasionally take place at the equator, Lander 1990), and ocean (e.g. the
Equatorial Undercurrent, Pedlosky 1996), and thus the dynamics of barotropic “cosine,”
“hyperbolic secant,” and “Gaussian” jets have been the subject of many studies regarding
the stability of geophysical flows (Lipps 1963; Yanai and N itta 1968; Kuo 1973; Marinone
and Ripa 1984). As with the hyperbolic tangent profile, numerical solvers are required in
order to find any unstable modes. Unlike the hyperbolic tangent case, these jets are non
monotonic and possess two inflection points, which complicates the underlying dynamics.
Figure 4.7 shows the growth rate, phase speed diagram, and structures of the most unstable
modes for a Gaussian je t of the form
M v ) = Uae ~ ^ \ (4.3)
with Uo = 1 and r = 0.1, as shown in subplot (a). The smaller in-plots are blow-ups of
the profile showing the positions of the sampled points with respect to the location of the
inflection point (marked by the horizontal line). The domain extends from y — - 1 /2 to
y = 1/2 and resolution is n = 800. Plots (b) and (c) show growth rate and phase speed.
The latter plot also shows the dispersion relationships of the modes generated by the closest
kinks to the inflection points (see subplot (a) for marker correspondence). Only two curves
appear because curves on opposite sides of the mid-jet exactly overlap. Note th a t the phase
speed of the most unstable disturbance decreases as fc becomes smaller, while the opposite
behaviour is observed for the weaker mode. Plots (d) and (e) show the structures of the
modes a t each peak (fc = 9.538 and fc = 6.024, respectively).
A review of the possible mechanisms behind the appearance of these modes is given
below.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 66
4.3.1 T h e over-reflection m echanism
r e f l e c t o rI I I I I
i n c i d e n t
T r a n s m it te d
r e f l e c t e d
d e c a yy ry c
I I I I I I I I I
Figure 4.8: The top figure shows the required wave geometry for over-reflection to take
place (after Proehl, 1996). The lower figure shows this geometry applied to a barotropic
Gaussian jet.
Proehl (1996) explained the instability mechanism of the barotropic Gaussian je t based
on the idea of “wave over-reflection” . This theory has been developed since the 1970s by
Lindzen (1988). Briefly, waves impinging on a region of wave decay (II) (see Fig. 4.8) are
partly transm itted into region (III) (if region (II) is thin enough), and partly reflected back
into (I). Over-reflection takes place when the amplitude of the reflected wave is larger than
that of the incident wave, i.e. the reflection coefficient is greater than one. If the reflected
waves are again bounced back towards region (II) a quantization condition is created (since
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 67
the wave must satisfy the appropriate boundary conditions), and the continuously over
reflected wave would lead to an unstable mode. The growth rate can be then estimated
using the “laser formula”
In R° ~ 2t ’
where r is the time the over-reflected wave takes to traverse region (I), and R is the reflection
coefficient.
For the case of the Gaussian je t the equivalent regions required for the over-reflection
geometry are also labelled (I), (II) and (III) in the bottom diagram of Fig. 4.8. A disturbance
propagating in regions (I) is over-reflected in regions (II) and grows as the process repeats
itself (Proehl, 1996).
The over-reflection theory, however, has encountered some difficulties. Smyth and
Peltier (1989), for example, have noted that the over-reflection mechanism fails near the
Kelvin-Helmholtz/Holmboe instability transition in a stably stratified Boussinesq shear
layer. Takehiro and Hayashi (1992) subsequently found the theory unsuitable to explain
shear instabilities in a shallow-water model, as the over-reflection mechanism cannot be ap
plied to “divergent waves” (as opposed to “vorticity modes” ). As will be seen in Chapter 5
the wave resonance theory can provide insight into the stability of models which support
divergent waves.
4.3.2 T he wave-resonance m echanism
In the Gaussian je t there are three distinct regions in which waves are grouped by their
direction of propagation. Modes located where v.QylJ > 0 propagate towards the right while
those in the central region where u0yy < 0 have a negative phase speed c. These are shown
schematically in Fig. 4.9.
Recalling the hyperbolic tangent profile it is clear th a t resonances can take place near the
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows &
Figure 4.9: Diagram showing the resonant waves generated by a Gaussian jet. The crosses
indicate the inflection points.
inflection points. From Fig. 4.7 it can be seen th a t both instabilities possess the same phase
speed (c ~ 0.607) a t their respective critical wavenumbers, which is equal to the background
velocity at the inflection points. This value also lies between the phase speeds of the four
neutral modes closest to the inflection points as shown in plot (c), suggesting a resonance
between “A” and “V” modes in each half of the flow. The reason behind the appearance of
two unstable modes with such dissimilar structures can be better understood by using the
crude piecewise linear analogue of the Gaussian je t shown in Fig. 4.10. Again, two unstable
modes appear, each qualitatively similar to its “counterpart” in the Gaussian jet. The
most rapidly growing perturbation shown in plot (d) can be attribu ted to the simultaneous
resonance of the modes in each half of the jet, i.e. two instances of the same instability
which takes place in Fig. 3.1 with the maxima on each side of the channel in phase. The
secondary mode in plot (e), on the other hand, results from the same simultaneous resonance
bu t when the maxima are out of phase. When the mid-region between the kinks vanishes
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 69
(b)0.3
0.2
0.1
- 0.1
- 0.2
-0.3,0.5
k(d)
-10
10
m
-10kx
Figure 4.10: A piecewise linear “jet,” with the structure of the most unstable mode at
fc = 0.837 shown in (d), and that of the peak secondary instability a t fc = 0.784 in (e).
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows___________________________________________________________70
we obtain the “triangular je t” (cf. Fig. 3.4), and the secondary mode disappears as the
decoupling effect of this region is no longer present.
(a) (b)
642
a 0 -2 - 4 -6
lAAAAAAAAAA
£
1.5
1
0.5
0
-0 .5
-1
-1 .5
M v )
(o)
0.3
0.2
- 0.1
- 0.2
-0.3,1.50.5
fc(d )
10
0e -
^
l l f lzzr
* -1 00.5 1fc 1.5 kx R fi.
10 M
-10kx R tig
Figure 4.11: Same as Fig. 4.10, but for a wider je t (structures shown a t k — 0.799).
Consider the effect of making the mid-region even wider as shown in Fig. 4.11. The shear
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 71
layers are now sufficiently far apart so th a t the structure of the two unstable modes (which
have the same growth rates) are essentially two independent instances of the instability
shown in Fig. 3.1, one with the meridional extrema in phase and the other with them out
of phase. The primary mode in the narrow case thus “splits,” resulting in the disturbance
shown in Fig. 4.11(d). The secondary mode remains fairly unchanged, with the wave
trains in each half of the perturbation pictured in Fig. 4.10(e) separating further to yield
Fig. 4.11(e).
Using a smooth, wide je t mimics this behaviour, as can be seen from Fig. 4.12 which
shows a Hyper-Gaussian profile of the form
ua(y) = U0e - ^ \ (4.4)
where now Uq = 1 and r = 0.555. Although the meridional e-folding distance of the
je t remains the same, the separation between the inflection points increases due to the
“flattening” of the peak. The resulting effect is th a t the instabilities sta rt becoming more
localized about the inflection points, as shown in plot (c), where now two maxima are
apparent across the width of the channel.
One clearly cannot take the analogy between a smooth flow and a piecewise linear
profile too far. An analysis similar to the one above can be done on the cosine je t (see, for
example, Yanai and N itta 1968) as is shown in Fig. 4.13. Qualitatively, the single unstable
mode which this je t supports is similar to the most unstable mode of the Gaussian je t [(see
Fig. 4.13(c) and Fig. 4.10(c)]. The secondary mode, however, is absent, as the comparison
between the stability of Gaussian and cosine jets shows. The idea of wave resonance may
help in elucidating how and where (in wavenumber space) an unstable mode develops, but
it remains unclear how well it can actually predict whether a certain flow will be unstable,
and if so how many instabilities there will be (advances towards obtaining such conditions,
however, have been made by Baines and Mitsudera, 1994). So far there are no criteria
th a t can provide sufficient conditions for the instability of a symmetric jet. Necessary and
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 72
Figure 4.12: A Hyper-Gaussian profile. Plot (d) shows the structure of the most unstable
mode a t k = 2.452. The secondary mode in (e) peaks at k = 2.492.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 73
sufficient conditions for certain monotonic je ts do exist, however, as seen in section 3.4.
Applying the Rosenbluth and Simon stability criterion (3.25) proves th a t half a cosine
je t is stable, while each half of the Gaussian (and the Hyper-Gaussian) je t satisfies the
instability condition, and can readily be solved numerically as shown in Fig. 4.14. The
growth rate curve in plot (b) is identical to the one of the secondary mode in Fig. 4.7, and
again the instability is due to the resonance between the two modes ( “A” and “V”) nearest
to the inflection point, as shown in plot (c). The structure of the most unstable wave is
drawn in plot (d), and is just the lower half of the perturbation pictured in Fig. 4.7(d).
This suggests th a t the criteria of Rosenbluth and Simon may yield a sufficient (but not
necessary) condition regarding the stability of symmetric jets.
In essence then, the discretized Gaussian je t generates three “families” of waves, each
grouped by the sign of the curvature of the flow, and distinguished by their intrinsic phase
speeds. Numerically only four modes actually phase-lock, although the instability depends
on the structure of the flow as a whole (since the to tal difference energy must vanish). Each
instability is the product of a different resonance between the waves shown in Fig. 4.9.
The weaker one is due to the simultaneous resonance of the waves localized about each
inflection point, and can be readily “split” into its components as shown in Fig. 4.14.
More importantly, the necessary and sufficient stability condition (3.25) in single-inflection
monotonic flows might be applicable to symmetric jets as a sufficient condition. Both
instabilities can be modelled in a qualitative manner using a simple piecewise je t such as
the one shown in Fig 4.10(a).
4.4 The (3 effect
So far we have focused our attention on rotating flows which take place on a plane. In
actuality the motions which concern us, albeit essentially horizontal, take place on a curved
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 7-
Figure 4.13: Stability of a cosine jet. The structure of the only mode present is some
what similar to th a t of the most unstable Hyper-Gaussian mode shown in Fig. 4.12(d),
although only one maxima is present along the y direction.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 75
(a) (b)
-0 .5 ,
(C)
0.5
25k
0.64
0.62
0 .6;
0.5820 25
k
-0 .5 kx R tly
Figure 4.14: Same as Fig. 4.7 but for the lower half of the Gaussian jet.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 76
earth, and hence a spherical geometry is more appropriate. Small meridional motions2
about a central latitude 9i, however, may be assumed to take place on a flat surface for
which the Coriolis param eter / varies linearly with y, and thus the ambient vorticity on a
/3-plane becomes:
One well-known consequence due to the background vorticity gradient is its stabilizing
effect, as will be seen by the generalization of the semicircle theorem discussed in the follow
ing section. On the other hand it has also been shown, in light of the wave resonance theory,
th a t waves generated by the presence of /? can produce new unstable modes (Kobayashi and
Sakai, 1993). In this chapter we shall analyze what effect the ambient vorticity gradient
has on the jets which currently concern us.
4.4.1 R ossby waves and stability criteria
We consider flows such th a t u0 is constant. The current is assumed to be bounded by
rigid walls a t y = ±6, and hence the no normal-flow condition is still i/>(±6) = 0 . If /3 is
constant and nonzero we have
f ( y ) = fe + Pe y
where
f t = 2fisin(6>e),
01 = cos(0<)-
(4.5)
which admits the solution:
(4.6)
20 f scales smaller than the radius of the earth tq.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
C h a p te r 4. S ta b il i ty in th e q u as ig eo stro p h ic m o d e l: re so n a n c e in n u m erica lly d isc re tiz e d flows_______________________________________________________ 77
where $ = m r /2 ,I2 = (rar)2/(26)2 (n = 1 ,2 ,3 . . . ) , and where the dispersion relationship
. 13k .a = u°k - 2 . nH5 ( ^M T 4(l2
must hold. These are divergent Rossby waves which appear due to the background potential
vorticity gradient caused by the /3-effect. Note th a t the walls provide the quantization
condition, so th a t if 6 —> oo the dispersion relationship becomes:
a = u0k - (4.8)
and we are left with a single Rossby wave.
W hen the background flow is nonzero the problem is usually analytically intractable.
An exception is the Couette flow on a /3-plane, for which the vorticity equation
= (4'9)
can be written in the form of W hittaker’s Equation by making
3(y) = (2tt/uoy)(u0yy - c ) ,
so th a t (Howard and Drazin, 1964):
'Pa + ( j - $ = °> (4 1 °)
where re = /3/(2/iUos). A solution can then be obtained in terms of confluent hypergeo
metric functions (Kummer’s functions):
•0 (3) = A e -(j/2 ,3 M (1 - re, 2,3) + B e~(j/2)3 U (1 - re, 2 ,3) , (4-11)
where A and B are constants (Abramowitz and Stegun, 1972). The streamfunction must
satisfy the homogeneous boundary conditions a t ± 6, which implies th a t the determinant
c-(J(+«/2) J(+6) M ( l — re, 2, 3(+4)) e- (3(+e/2) J(+|>) u ( 1 - re, 2, 3(+t))(4.12)
e -(j(-6 )/2 ) 3( 6) M (1 - re, 2 , 3 M ) ) e - b ( - n / 2> 3 ,_ t) I f (1 - re, 2 , 3 (_ 6))
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 78
- 0.1
- 0.2
-0 .3
-0 .4
-0 .5
- 0 .(
- 0 .7
k
Figure 4.15: Dispersion relationship of the first ten Rossby waves in the absence of back
ground shear. The nondimensional width of the channel is 2b = 4, while 0 = 0.375,
which represents a m id-latitude value of 1.5 x 10“ n (m s ) " 1.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 79
must vanish. At a given wavenumber the number of deformed Rossby modes decreases
(starting with the waves of highest mode number) as the shear becomes stronger. In
the numerical eigenvalue problem this translates as singular modes from the discretized
continuum appearing a t the expense of vanishing Rossby waves.
Howard’s semicircle theorem may be extended to quasigeostrophic flows on a /3-plane
(Pedlosky, 1987) in order to obtain the following bounds on the complex value of a mode’s
phase speed:
change sign in order for instability to take place3. Thus a barotropic flow with weak enough
shear will be stable. Furthermore, Kuo also noted th a t the phase speed of an unstable mode
is constrained by the background flow velocity to be C/max > c > Umi„ (Kuo, 1949).
From the wave resonance perspective, the range of phase speeds follows from the fact
th a t there are no shear modes capable of resonating outside the range of uo(y). Although
Rossby modes are present they all possess intrinsic phase speeds of the same sign (they
propagate westward), and remain neutral as a result. Rossby modes, however, are capable
of phase-locking with shear modes within the continuum, resulting in new instabilities. This
N onetheless Pedlosky (1987) has noted tha t “the presence of the /3-effect can be expected to introduce the
possibility o f new, unstable modes in the presence of shear, although alone it provides a stabilizing restoring
mechanism as manifested by the Rossby wave.’’.
min(uo) —2 ( / i 2 + tt2/ 4 )
< Cr < max(uo),
c? < - (max(uo) - min(u0))2 + (max(tto) - min(uo))
for a 2D flow Uo(y, z). In spite of the radius increase, /? is a stabilizing param eter according
to Kuo’s theorem, which requires th a t for a barotropic flow
d2uo(y)dy2
(4.14)
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 80
explains the asymmetry of eastward jets with respect to their westward counterparts (Ped
losky, 19S7), since in the latter case the Rossby waves lie embedded within the continuum
of shear modes, yielding resonances between modified Rossby and shear modes (Kobayashi
and Sakai, 1993). Although the stability of eastward jets is also affected, no resonances can
take place with westward-propagating modes (associated with the Rossby modes), since the
Doppler shift due to the background flow acts against the phase-locking.
4.5 The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane
W hen (S is nonzero the continuum modes are modified and modes with negative phase
speeds appear. The la tter can be identified as shear-deformed Rossby modes, as can be seen
from the phase speed diagrams in Fig. 4.16 and Fig. 4.17. When the Hyper-Gaussian je t
is very weak there is no instability present and the discretized continuum appears between
c = 0 and c = 0.01, which corresponds to the velocity range of the background flow.
The waves with negative phase speeds correspond to the (slightly) shear-deformed Rossby
modes. As the background flow becomes stronger (Fig. 4.17) the two unstable modes appear
and the dispersion curves of the Rossby modes are further shifted and deformed. A longwave
cut-off appears for the more unstable mode (which is the anti-symmetric perturbation), but
close inspection of the bifurcations a t both long and short critical wavenumbers shows that
the resonating waves have phase speeds larger than zero, and hence belong to the shear
mode discretized continuum.
We thus again consider the Hyper-Gaussian westerly je t given by equation (4.4) and
analyzed in Section 4.3 in the absence of /3. The scales for L and U are 106 m and 40 m s- ’ ,
respectively, and the e-folding meridional width of the je t is 555 km. The flow is constrained
by a channel 3000 km across, which is wide enough to avoid any wall effects. Given the
above scaling the dimensional growth rates (in seconds) can be obtained by multiplying the
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 81
-0.05
- 0.1
-0.15u
S '
- 0.2
-0.25
-0.3
0 3 41 2 5 7 86k
Figure 4.16: Dispersion relation of a weak, westerly Hyper-Gaussian je t on a mid-latitude
/3-plane. W hen the shear is small ([/0 = 0.01) the flow is stable and the Rossby modes
(of negative phase speeds) are only slighted affected.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 82
Figure 4.17: A stronger Hyper-Gaussian je t (t/o = 0.1) leads to unstable modes, although
the lower Rossby modes can still be discerned. Close inspection at the the lower critical
wavenumber, however, reveals th a t the slower instability does not bifurcate into a shear-
deformed Rossby mode.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 83
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0-5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0 2 4 6 8
0.8
0.6u
S0.4
0.2
0 2 4 6 8
Figure 4.18: Eastward Hyper-Gaussian je t on an /-p lane (to be compared with the
/3-plane result of Fig. 4.19). The scales used are the same as in Fig. 4.15. Each mode is
unstable for 0 < k 2 < k l where kc is the corresponding critical wavenumber.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 84
values from the figures by (L / U ).
For comparison, Fig. 4.18 shows the growth rate curves and their corresponding phase
speeds obtained for the je t on an /-p lane, while Fig. 4.19 shows the same plots when
0 = 0.375 (a mid-latitude /3-plane).
On the /3-plane the neutral waves which coalesce a t the higher wavenumbers correspond
to the discretized modes from the continuum located nearest to the effective inflection point
where /3 — u0yy vanishes. The symmetric mode, however, presents now a long-wave cutoff at
k = 0.668 due to the effect of /3. Careful examination near this critical wavenumber reveals
th a t the unstable mode and its complex conjugate are again connected to two neutral modes
from the discretized continuum, so th a t the modified Rossby modes (of negative phase
speeds) are not directly participating in the resonance. Furthermore, the structure of the
symmetric instability a t various wavenumbers does not differ much from the /-plane case
(this also holds true for the anti-symmetric mode). Figure 4.20 shows the structure of the
symmetric and anti-symmetric modes at their respective peaks. Although the effect of 0
in this case causes the longwave cutoff, the nature of both instabilities remains essentially
the same.
Flipping the je t so th a t it flows westward reveals little difference with respect to its
westward /-p lane counterpart in any respect. The westward phase speeds of the unstable
modes become slightly greater but there is no longwave cutoff nor is there any notable
change in the growth rate curves. This seems to be due to the fact th a t the strength of the
je t essentially “swamps” the shear-deformed Rossby waves (i.e. the Rossby waves disappear
and singular modes appear), which in the case of no background flow possess phase speeds
up to approximately c = —0.34 (i.e. smaller in magnitude than the je t minimum of -1).
The effect of 0 on the Gaussian je t is similar to that on the Hyper-Gaussian profile —
the most unstable mode presents a longwave cutoff but the structures and growth rates of
the unstable disturbances remain essentially unchanged. This holds true for both eastward
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 85
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.5
-0.5
82 64k
Figure 4.19: Eastward Hyper-Gaussian je t on a /3-plane. Although the symmetric (and
most unstable) mode now presents a second critical wavenumber a t k = 0.668, it does
not bifurcate into a Rossby mode.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized flows 86
1.5
mi '"i
1.5
1.5
Figure 4.20: Structures of the unstable modes due to of a Hyper-Gaussian je t on a /3-plane.
The most unstable mode is pictured a t the top when k = 2.53. The secondary mode
peaks at k = 2.46 and is pictured a t the bottom.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 4. Stability in the quasigeostrophic model: resonance in numericallydiscretized f l o w s ___________________________________________________ 87
and westward flows.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5
The H yper-G aussian jet on a /3-plane:
shallow-water and Boussinesq models
5.1 Equatorial flows and the role o f gravity waves
Unstable modes in barotropic QG flows result from the resonance of the various vorticity
waves which a given geometry can support through shear in the basic flow and background
vorticity. The relatively simple dynamics of the QG formulation, however, comes a t a cost,
such as the fact that the regions in which this model can be applied are constrained, through
the smallness of the Rossby number, to latitudes far away from the equator. Although the
barotropic equation can be applied a t low latitudes, it makes no provision for flows of finite
depth. Furthermore, they both fail to capture many dynamical features which can take
place even at midlatitudes. This is of course due to the many simplifications made in the
derivation from the more general Boussinesq equations (2.1). In view of the wave resonance
theory it is clear th a t by successively filtering out certain types of waves some resonances
are no longer possible, and hence unstable modes which are captured by more complex
models do not show up in corresponding QG flows. In this chapter we shall analyze the
88
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /J-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models_______________________________________________ 89
stability of the shallow-water and Boussinesq systems which can sustain gravity waves and
also allow for the modelling of flows at any latitude (in particular, a t the equator).
Many studies of equatorial flows have focused on the dynamics of the Equatorial Un
dercurrent (EUC), a powerful eastward flow which consists of a thin ribbon of water ap
proximately 200 km wide located between 100 and 200 m deep, reaching speeds of up to
1.5 m s_1 under the ocean’s surface (Pedlosky, 1996). Marinone and Ripa (1984), for exam
ple, analyzed the stability of various Gaussian jets using a one-layer, shallow-water model.
The westerly wind bursts which concern us, however, are much wider jets, and hence we
will focus our attention in this chapter on the stability of an atmospheric Hyper-Gaussian
profile.
5.2 N eutral waves in shallow-water theory
We shall now analyze the neutral modes which the shallow-water (SW) model is capable
of capturing. We begin by nondimensionalizing the linearized SW system (2.10) as follows:
0x ,y ) L{x,y ) (u0,u i , v , ) i-> U(u0, u lt Vi)
so th a t it becomes
(5.1a)
(5.1b)
(5.1c)
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a 3-plane: shallow-water and Boussinesq models_________________________________________________________ 90
where F = U / \ /g H is the Froude number. Substituting solutions o f the form
(5-2)
for all perturbation fields we obtain:
i (ku0 - o) ui - ~ ^ j vi + hi = 0 (5.3a)
i (ku0 - a ) i i i + f i i + ( J k j = 0 (5'3b)
i (kuo — a ) h \ + ikhoiii -I— = 0. (5.3c)ay
Consider the case where ho is constant and hence uo = 0. Dropping hats and eliminating
hi (see Appendix B) from the above yields,
a2vi + icrfui + (kh0Ui - ih0Viv)y = 0 (5.4a)
a2ui - i a f v i - (khoiii - ihoViy) = 0. (5.4b)
Solving for Vi then gives the governing equation for the perturbations with nonzero merid
ional velocity component:
v iyy + (ct2 - / 2) - ^ f y ~ ^ v i = (5-5)
5.2.1 N eutral m odes on a shallow-water equatorial /3-plane
For simplicity we shall assume th a t a flow in the presence of a varying Coriolis parameter
takes place on the equatorial /3-plane. Substituting / = f3y into equation (5.5) and solving
yields solutions of the form
F 2/}'ho
d/4)y , (5-6)
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a 5-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models___________________________________________ 91
where is the n-th Hermite polynomial. The dispersion relationship for these waves is
fc2 + (2n + 1) ( ^ 0 ) ~ W = 0- (5-7)
where n = 1 ,2 ,___ Note th a t quantization occurs in spite of the fact th a t there are no
lateral walls present — the meridional gradient of the Coriolis param eter constrains the
waves within a band about the equator. For low-frequency waves the above reduces to:
kp
fc2 + (2n + 1 ) ( 0 F / y / h ^ ’(5.8)
which corresponds to the westward-propagating Rossby modes, while for large values of a
we have
( P F \ \ 1/2+ (2n + l) £ = , (5.9)
which are the fast gravity waves. When n is zero we obtain the Yanai wave, which behaves
like a gravity wave when k is small and like a Rossby wave at large wavenumbers. Its
frequency lies between slow and fast waves, and when k = 0 it is equal to
P s fh o F '
The full dispersion relation can be written in the following manner:
, i ft
(5.10)
k 2 a ± 2 V<r2
There is also a solution for which «i = 0 throughout the domain, in which case the
dispersion relation and wave structure for the equatorially trapped mode are
a = yfh0, (5.12)
Ul „ e-{msM-0)y\ (513)
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models_______________________________ 92
Yanai
GravityEquatorial Kelvin
0.5
Rossby
-0 .5
Yanai Boundary Kelvin Gravity
-1 .54 .52 .5
k3.50.5 1.5
Figure 5.1: Neutral modes supported by the shallow-water model a t the equator (numerical
solution). Note the appearance of boundary Kelvin waves propagating westward with
c = - 1 . These are due to the artificial walls required to bound the numerical problem.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian je t on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models__________________________________________ _ _ _ _ _ _______93
This is an eastward propagating Kelvin wave. A diagram showing the entire spectrum is
given in Fig. 5.1. This plot was made by solving the numerical eigenvalue problem derived
in Appendix B using 50 grid points. The basic depth ho was assumed to be equal to one,
while the scaled /3 a t the equator was set to 0.912. The Froude number was F = 1 and
the width of the channel (required in order to bound the eigenvalue problem) was assumed
to be 12, or approximately 8 times the e-folding half-width of the unperturbed equatorial
Kelvin wave. The numerical solution is in complete agreement with the dispersion relations
obtained directly by plotting equations (5.11) and (5.12).
Stability conditions for the shallow-water model on a /3-plane were obtained by Ripa
(1982). Given a zonal je t of shape n0(y) the flow is stable if
[ a - u 0(i/)]<3s (y) > o and [a - u0{ y ) f < grH(y) for all y (5.14)
for some value of a , where
Q { y ) = m ^ M , (5.i5)
and H[y) is the layer depth of the basic state. When the flow is nondivergent the latter
condition is trivially satisfied since gr - t oo, and the first condition simply reduces to
F jortoft’s theorem when a is equal to the flow velocity at the inflection point. The wave
resonance interpretation is then the one given in Section 4.1 and illustrated in Fig. 4.1.
W hen the flow is divergent the second condition implies th a t if the speed range of the
profile is less than the minimum phase speed of the long gravity waves the flow will be
stable (the a guaranteeing th a t if the flow is stable in one inertial frame of reference it must
be stable in all inertial frames of reference). In other words, the waves’ phase speeds must
match if instability is to take place.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models________________________________________________________ 9^
5.3 Stability o f an equatorial H yper-G aussian jet in
shallow-water
The background flow is again chosen to be a Hyper-Gaussian je t identical to the one
used in the previous chapter a t midlatitudes. The basic zonal flow and the pressure field
are assumed to be in geostrophic balance, and so the background basic height field and
resulting velocity profile are:
where again U0 = 1 and r = 0.555. The Froude number F was calculated to be equal to
0.08 by assuming th a t the atmospheric depth scale is 10 km and setting the scale velocity
to be 25 m s_1. This is clearly an over-simplification, but it serves to understand what
effect, if any, shallow-water gravity waves might have on the above je t if the atmosphere
is treated simply as a thin, homogeneous layer of fluid. Furthermore, the Froude number
we are considering is in itself an upper limit to what one could reasonably expect for the
flow we are analyzing since we are using the peak velocity Uo to determine it. On the
other hand, we note th a t when the Froude number vanishes the eigenvalue equation (B.l)
is reduced to th a t of the barotropic case (q.v. Chapter 4). This is to be expected since it is
equivalent to making the phase speed of the gravity waves infinite, and hence render them
incapable of resonating with any other neutral mode.
Thus, as the Froude number decreases the phase speed of the gravity waves becomes
larger and hence the possibility that these may be Doppler-shifted enough to resonate
with the shear-generated waves, the slow shear-deformed Rossby waves, or the westward
propagating gravity waves is negligible unless the background flow is very strong. In effect,
the je t we are analyzing seems too weak to do so, as can be seen from the growth rate curve
(5.16)
u0 = U0e - ^ (5.17)
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian je t on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models_________________________________________________ 95
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
2 6 840
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
- 0.2
-0.4
2 6 80 4k
Figure 5.2: Eastward Hyper-Gaussian je t on an equatorial /3-plane. W hile not all modes
have converged (see Fig. 5.3), it is useful to compare with the QG midlatitude result
shown in Fig. 4.19, for which the unstable modes present essentially the same character
istics.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a 5-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models_____________________________________________ 96
shown in Fig. 5.2. Again there are two main unstable modes, both having a short-wave
cut-off a t k r : 5 w ith the most unstable mode possessing a second critical wavenumber at
fc s« 1. The dispersion relationship shows again the discretized continuum between c = 0
and c = 1, together with the slow westward-propagating shear-deformed Rossby waves. The
high-speed gravity waves do not participate in either instability, and both show essentially
the same behaviour as their QG counterparts, as can be seen by comparing Fig. 5.2 with
Fig. 4.19.
In order to verify the above result (which was obtained using 200 grid points along
y), and to check whether the weaker modes are spurious or not, we carry out the same
calculation a t a high resolution using the sparse techniques described in Appendix B. The
curves, shown in Fig. 5.3, indicate that none of the weaker modes are in fact real, and
furthermore show th a t the slight bulging of the growth rate curves a t high wavenumber in
Fig. 5.2 is a product of the low resolution.
Figure 5.4 shows the structures of the two modes. They are similar to the barotropic
modes (Fig. 4.20) save for one im portant difference: the anti-symmetric mode is now the
most unstable perturbation while the meridionally symmetric mode becomes the weaker
instability. The reason for this behaviour is due to the change in sign of the Coriolis pa
rameter across the equator. At midlatitudes the unstable modes consist of two eddies which
arise as a result of the vorticity wave coupling. At the equator the dynamics are very sim
ilar since the gravity waves are too fast (due to the smallness of the Froude number) to
resonate with the slower shear-generated modes. Again two cross-jet eddies form with each
instability, and both modes possess essentially the same wind fields as they did at m idlati
tudes, th a t is, the most unstable mode has two co-rotating counter-clockwise eddies while
the secondary mode consists of counter-rotating vortices. On the southern hemisphere,
however, a counter-clockwise vortex implies a pressure high, while clockwise flow requires
a pressure dip, which is the result shown in Fig. 5.4. Since the Froude number is so small
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /?-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models _____________________________ _ _ __________________ 97
0.9
0.7
0.6
^ 0.5&
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
1.2
0.4
0.2
- 0.2
-0.4
6 7 80 2 3 4 51
k
Figure 5.3: Same as the previous figure but using a high-resolution sparse calculation. The
number of interior grid points in this case was set to n — 10000.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models 98
- 3
3
- 3
Figure 5.4: Structure of the most unstable (top) and the secondary (bottom) modes at
k = 2.46 and k = 2.25, respectively. The contours represent isolines of hi, while the
plots labelled R and £ show the Reynolds stress and the vorticity.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /?-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models_____________________________________ 99
the perturbation height becomes:
kl F 2r 2 - fc2/i0(r{vih0)y - % i ) (5.18)
~ -T JT - (r(Ul/l0)y - k h o T j V l ) , (5.19)
whereupon substitution into (B.4) gives
[ k h 0r j v i + ( r(u1/io)y - k h 0T ] V i ) ] , (5.20)
and since ho » 1 the relationship between meridional and zonal winds reduces to the one
found in QG theory:
Thus the corresponding wind fields of each unstable mode remain unchanged and it is
the pressure which adjusts to the change of sign in / . Clearly care must be taken when
evaluating the pressure field: the values of the nondimensional wind fields are of 0(1),
while hi is approximately of (?(10~3). Using 4000 grid points the residuals of the numerical
solution were of <9(10-2), and it required 10000 grid points to bring them down to O (10-4).
5.4 The Boussinesq m odel
The derivation of the shallow-water equations is based on the assumption th a t the
density is constant and the flow is hydrostatic. As a consequence the resulting fields are
independent of 2 and there is no variation with depth, in contrast w ith the Boussinesq model
presented in Section 2.2. As with the quasigeostrophic model, the vertical structure in the
Boussinesq model of a barotropic instability is specified by the solution of the baroclinic
eigenvalue problem (q.v. Section 3.1). Unlike the QG case, however, the dependence
of the barotropic mode on the vertical wavenumber m is more involved, and cannot be
i k u i ~ — V \ y . (5.21)
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a 3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models__________________________________________ 100
/-p lane
G GG G
/3-plane
G OEq
G G
Figure 5.5: On a northern /-plane (say) the most unstable unstable mode (pictured on the
top left) is symmetric and results from vorticity wave coupling, as does the secondary
mode shown to its right. The dynamics of the modes remain unchanged when the
flow is shifted to an equatorial /?-plane, and hence in order to conserve the sense of
rotation within the disturbance the signs of the pressure perturbations must switch
when crossing the equator (since the sign of / changes). The most unstable mode is thus
the antisymmetric perturbation shown in the bottom left diagram.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /?-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models 101
simply taken into account by defining an “equivalent” wavenumber. Since the value of m
is interpreted in terms of the depth of the flow (which is confined between the ground and
the tropopause), we can therefore analyze the behaviour of an equatorial barotropic je t in
a finite depth domain.
5.5 N eutral waves supported by the Boussinesq m odel
The linearized Boussinesq system has already been derived in Chapter 2, equation (2.3).
Using separation of variables and assuming solutions of the form
# r , y , z , t ) = 4>[y) ( ^ ) ei<tl" ‘)-
for ui*Vi,pi, and
ip (x ,y ,z , t ) = <£(y)¥3(z)e’(fcc- '7i>
for wi and pi results in two eigenvalue problems in y and z. The former can be written as
7 % + 2waisP l y y - P l y f p + u 2 - P i
' 2 _ k f \ + ikfuiUy _ f v + u= 0, (5.22)
u(aJ2 + f y ) N $ - w 2 \
where u = k u 0—cr and r/ = uoy —f . In order to keep the problem separable the stratification
N is assumed to be constant.
The vertical wavenumber m is the eigenvalue resulting from the z-component of the
separation of variables
= —rr?tp where tp = 0 a t z = 0, H, (5.23)
which, as previously mentioned, describes the dynamics of the baroclinic perturbation
within the barotropic flow (Pedlosky, 1987). The solution to equation (5.23) is:
ip = <po sin(mz) m = ~ - n = 0 ,1 ,2 ___ (5.24)H
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models _________________________________________ ___ 102
We will consider the fundamental vertical mode, n = 1, so th a t m = n j H is solely a
function of the domain’s height.
For our purposes it is more convenient to cast the problem in term s of the meridional
perturbation velocity iq ,
| k2 (u 2 - N$) + m 2u 2j jfcuu)! + / u l!(j -
| ( u j 2 - iVg) + m 2uj2j (m2/w ) {uiviy — krjvi) +
k (w2 - No) (uviyy - hrjyVi + t / % ) ] -
2km2ULjyNo (uviy — krjVij = 0, (5.25)
from where the other fields can be readablv derived as follows:
Pi = r- u v i y ) (ui2 - JVq)
■■
(it/2 — No) k 2 + m 2u 2
muip!u 2 - N 2 ’
Pi :_ f i m \ N%pi
\ g J u 2 - N o ’
i = (£) ^ + i '-i m w i ) .
In the absence of any background flow equation (5.25) reduces to
V l w +
2 o2 — f 2 k N 2 - a 2 ~ a Jyf y - k 2 • 0.
which, on the equatorial /3-plane / = /3y, has solutions of the form
m ~ e(7/2),K„ (7 ) ,
where
(5.26)
(5.27)
(5.28)
(5.29)
(5.30)
(5.31)
_ f m 2(py
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models______________________________________ 103
and the resulting dispersion relationship is:
, 1/2k = - A I 13 4m
2<r 2 V VnI (2n + l)/3 - (5.32)
The above equations describe all gravity and Rossby modes except for the equatorial
Kelvin wave. As before the la tter can be obtained by making Vi = 0 in equation (2.1)
which, together with the fact that u0 = 0, yields a wave of the form:
Ur ~ e~lm' /2)y\ (5.33)
with m* = m/(Nf3) and
a = + ( N /m ) k , (5.34)
where the positive sign is required if the perturbation is to remain bounded in y, i.e. the
Kelvin wave propagates eastward. The full dispersion relationship is shown in Fig. 5.6 for
two different depths set by the choice of the vertical wavenumber m . The plot was made
using the numerical algorithm described in Appendix C using a resolution of n = 50 grid
points, and the result agrees with direct calculation of equations (5.32) and (5.34).
5 .6 R o s s b y w a v e - K e l v i n w a v e c o u p l i n g
In order to understand how the finite depth can affect the nature of the resonances
between different types of waves we shall analyze a very simple profile consisting of a
piecewise linear flow which possesses a shear discontinuity (a “kink”) at the midpoint. This
Boussinesq flow is contained by a midlatitude channel of finite depth which has no vertical
shear, so th a t the profile can be specified as follows:
Iu\yy 0 < y < bL
u l tJy - bL < y < 0,
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models_______________________________________________________ 104
k
Figure 5.6: Neutral modes supported by the nonhydrostatic Boussinesq model in an equa
torial channel 30km (top) and 10km (bottom) deep. Classification of the modes is as in
Fig. 5.1.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models 105
with constant |uj | < / in regions j = 1,2. The Brunt-Vaisala frequency N is constant,
and as explained in the previous section we consider the domain to be vertically bounded,
its depth also constant and equal to H. A diagram of the flow (viewed from above) is shown
in Fig. 5.7. Equation (5.22) can be readably nondimensionalized as follows1:
wall
Region 1
y = 0
Region 2
wall
Figure 5.7: A bounded piecewise linear profile with a shear discontinuity. The shears in
regions 1 and 2 are u j and u\y, respectively.
Pyy ~ Pyei]y + 2e2w u y
ey + t 2u 2 ~ Pkr}y - 2ekuoj,. o Uri + e2ui2)
• - w = 0 , (5.35)u (i2ui2 + erj) 1 - e2(//JVo)2w2_
where we have scaled x and y by 2L in the horizontal; z, 1 /m and H by 2L f /N o in the
vertical; the flow velocity uo by the mean cross-channel velocity difference u0 = 2Luoy, and
time t by 2 i /u o . We have also nondimensionalized the quantities y = (l/e)(ey - 1) and
u = k((e j /e)y—c). Here e = Uo/2Lf = Uoj/// represents the mean Rossby number, which in
turn can be expressed in terms of the “local” Rossby numbers th a t characterize each region
1In this section we will drop the subscript “1” from the perturbation pressure p and perturbation
meridional velocity v.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models ______________________________________________ 106
as e = (ei + £2)/2. The restriction on the magnitude of the shear requires th a t t j < 1. Note
that the above scaling is valid only off the equator.
The required boundary' condition at the walls is given by the fact th a t the meridional
velocity v must vanish, and hence
which, together with the appropriate continuity conditions for p and v across the kink,
define the Boussinesq eigenvalue problem.
Even for this simple profile, however, we cannot analytically solve equation (5.35). A
numerical solution is nonetheless readably available by reducing the Boussinesq system (2.1)
to a single equation in the meridional perturbation velocity:
where S = (f / N ), and asking for v to vanish at the walls. We can then recast the above
case. The frequency eigenvalue can be real or complex depending on whether the mode is
neutral or unstable (the imaginary part thus representing the growth rate). The shear is
discontinuous a t y = 0, but we can still approximate it by means of the following function
(MacKay and Moore, 1995):
twpy — kp = 0, (5.36)
|fc2 (t2S 2u 2 — l) + e2m2u;2j [us + eiufcuj —
|fc2 (e2S2u 2 — l) + e2m2u;2j (e2m 2u) (uiVy — ktjv) +
k (e2S 2w2 — l ) (kvy + euvyy - ekr)yv) j —
equation as a generalized eigenvalue problem similar to the one solved in the shallow-water
(5.38)
where
£j(y) = -«2 e -C y _i_ e - c ( c i / 6 3 ) v
■)]}(5.39)
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models____________________________ 107
Here C is a curvature param eter which generates the profile shown in Fig. 5.7 as C oo.
For our calculations a value of C = 500 was found to be sufficiently high to reproduce the
physics of the piecewise linear flow. The parameters chosen for the calculations were as
follows: 4 = 1, t i = 0.2, and t 2 = 0.4. Sensitivity analyses indicated th a t a resolution of
100 grid points was sufficient.
In order to determine the stability as a function of height and the zonal wavenumber fc
we calculate the growth rates along m = a fc “cuts" where a is a constant ranging between 0
and 10 (recall th a t m = w/Ff). Figure (5.8) shows the nondimensional eigenvalue spectrum
obtained when a = 10. Two distinct regions of instability are present, one centred at
k ss 0.36 and another a t k as 0.403. A plot of the Reynolds stresses together with pressure
and horizontal velocity fields for the most unstable wave in each region of instability is
shown in Fig. 5.9.
One conspicuous difference between the two cases is the structure of the perturbations
along the indirection. At k = 0.360 the perturbation pressure has maxima at y = - 6 (—1
in this case), and at the middle of the channel where the kink is located, with relatively
little activity occurring in the northern region. The energetics show th a t the Reynolds
stresses are also localized in the southern half of the channel. The disturbance pressure
at k = 0.403, on the other hand, is distributed throughout the width of the channel. The
pressure and velocity fields in this case clearly show the perturbation maxima localized
near the boundaries. The horizontal Reynolds stresses also encompass the entire domain,
although the energy transfer varies due to the stronger shear when y < 0. Figure (5.10)
shows the vertical velocity fields. At fc = 0.360 the flow is mostly nondivergent except
near the south wall where w is large, while a t fc = 0.403 there is noticeable divergence at
both boundaries. Note th a t w w 0 at y = 0 in both cases. The dynamical mechanisms
pertaining to each mode thus appear to be quite different, and we now attem pt to gain a
better understanding of the physics involved.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models_______________________________________________ 108
0.02
- 0.02
- 0.04
- 0.06
- 0.08
- 0.1
- 0.12
- 0.14
- 0 .1 6 ---------------------1---------------------1---------------------1---------------------1---------------------1---------------------1---------------------1-------------------0.33 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.41
k
Figure 5.8: Nondimensional Boussinesq eigenvalue spectrum versus zonal wavenumber when
m = 10 k. Solid and dashed lines show the imaginary and real parts of the frequency,
respectively. Note the two regions of instability centred approximately a t k = 0.360 and
k = 0.403.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a ,5-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models_________________________________ 109
a) Pressure field/horizontal velocity k - 0.360 Energetics
0.6
0.4
0b) Pressure field/horizontal velocity k = 0.403 Energetics
0.6
0.4
0.2
Figure 5.9: The perturbation pressure (contours) and horizontal velocity (arrows) are plot
ted for each of the unstable modes. The Reynolds stresses (— (uv)xz (e,/e)) are shown to
the right of the fields. The walls are located a t y ~ ±1.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a (3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models__________________________________ HO
a) Vertical velocity w k = 0.360
0.6
0.4
0.2
- 0.2
-0.4
- 0.6
kxb) Vertical velocity w k — 0.403
0.6
0.4
0.2
- 0.2
-0.4
- 0.6
-o.:
kx
Figure 5.10: Vertical perturbation velocities a t k = 0.360 (top), and k = 0.403 (bottom).
Note th a t in the top figure the flow at midchannel is horizontally nondivergent.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models_______________________________________________________ 111
We first note th a t the flow shown in Fig. 5.7 has already been analyzed in Chapter 3 in
terms of the quasigeostrophic theory (see equations (3.15) and (3.16b)), which resulted in a
stable vorticity mode generated by the presence of the kink. I t is clear th a t QG theory will
not provide much insight into the instabilities arising in the Boussinesq case, and we thus
extend our analysis into the geostrophic momentum (GM) regime. The relevant system of
equations (2.22) has already been derived in Chapter 2.
As before, we can reduce the GM system to a single nondimensional equation in the
perturbation pressure
where -qy is a <5-function a t the kink. For each segment of the piecewise linear flow the above
equation simplifies to:
a t the walls, respectively. We can now analyze the stability of the profile shown in Fig. 5.7
using GM dynamics, and again assume solutions of the form
Pw ~Py{^)+p (eri (*2 + m2) + = ° ’ (5.40)
P y y - X2p = 0, A2 = fc2( l — e) + m2(l - e), (5.41)
where the continuity and boundary conditions on the pressure are:
= 0 (5.42)
a t the kink, and
eupy - kp = 0 (5.43)
p = A e ^ + B e - ^
p = C e ^ y + D e ~ ^ y
Region 1 (y > 0),
Region 2 (y < 0),
(5.44a)
(5.44b)
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models 112
where A / = fc2( 1 - e,j + m 2(l - ej), j = 1,2. Applying the appropriate continuity and
boundary conditions leads to the following system of equations:
A + B - C - D = 0,
Ar)2 (k + eaXi) + Brj2 (k — ecrAi) — Cr)i (k + eaX2) — Drji (k — eaX2) = 0,
Aex' b [eAr (a - ( d /e )kb) + fc] - B e - ’" 6 [eA! (a - (ei/e)kb) — fc] = 0,
Ce~x*b [eA2 (or + (e2/e)kb) + fc] - Dex*b [eA2 (or + (e2/e)A:&) - fc] = 0,
where r]j = (1 /t )(ej — 1), j = 1,2. Non-trivial solutions of the above system lead to three
dispersion relationships. Figure 5.11 shows a plot of the growth rate versus the wavenumber
when m = 10 k. Comparison with Fig. 5.8 shows very good agreement between the GM
and Boussinesq solutions. I t therefore appears that GM theory manages to capture the
additional dynamics present in the Boussinesq model. We will now proceed to identify the
mechanism responsible for the instabilities shown in Fig. 5.8 and Fig. 5.11.
Unlike the Boussinesq case, it is possible to obtain analytical expressions for the various
modes which arise in the GM model due to the presence of the walls and the kink. We can
then interpret the instabilities which arise in terms of resonances between these modes, and
furthermore explain the reason why the QG model is incapable of capturing the instabilities.
We commence by analyzing the waves generated in the GM case by solving locally at
the walls and near the kink. We thus “decompose” the basic flow into the profiles shown
in Fig. 5.12.
Assuming a solutions of the form
p(y) - Ae1 11" -6) (5.45)
near the boundary at y = +b we obtain, using equation (5.43), the following dispersion
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq m odels___________________________________________ 113
0.02
- 0.02
- 0.04
- 0.06
- 0.08
- 0.1
- 0.12
- 0.14
. 0 .1 6 -------------------- 1---------------------1---------------------1---------------------1---------------------1---------------------1---------------------1--------------------0.33 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.41
k
Figure 5.11: Nondimensional eigenvalue spectrum versus zonal wavenumber when m = 10 k,
GM case. Solid and dashed lines show the imaginary and real parts of the frequency.
The values used were 6 = 1, ei = 0.2 and e2 = 0.4. Compare with the result from the
Boussinesq model in figure (5.8).
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq m odels ________________ 114
y =
y = b
Figure 5.12: “Decomposition” of the velocity profile shown in Fig. 5.7 into three simpler
flows.
relation for the mode trapped at the northern wall:
keAi
In a similar manner, let
t+ K t )'
p(y) ~ .4e|A2|Cy+6J
i frequency of thea t the opposite wall. In this case the frequency of the boundary wave is
^ , / 2\
(5.46)
(5.47)
(5.48)
We identify these two boundary trapped modes as counterpropagating coastal Kelvin waves
(Kushner et al, 1998). At the kink the structure is identical to th a t given in equation (5.44),
but with A s= D = 0, so that the pressure remains bounded as y -¥ ±oo. The continuity
condition (5.42) then gives a Rossby wave
(r}2-r}{)ke(7?iA2 4- *
which a t order one reduces to equation (3.16b), its QG equivalent.
(5.49)
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models______________________________________________________ 115
In order for resonance to take place, the frequencies of the waves must match. Figure 5.13
shows the curves where the Doppler-shifted frequencies of the three neutral modes coincide
in k-m space. In this plot, each solid line represents the intersection of the cr-surfaces
generated by equations (5.46), (5.48) and (5.49) as functions of k and m. Note th a t the
m = 10 k dashed line cuts a Kelvin wave-Rossby wave matching curve at k « 0.36, and the
Kelvin wave-Kelvin wave matching condition a t k ~ 0.4.
4.5
R-K3.5
,K-K
K-R2.5
0.5
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Figure 5.13: Frequency matching contours: (a) Kelvin wave a t y = - b with the Rossby
wave at the kink (labeled K-R). (b) Both Kelvin waves (K-K). (c) Rossby and Kelvin
wave at y = +b (R-K). The values chosen for the various param eters are b = 1, ei = 0.2,
and t 2 = 0.4. The dashed lines are the k-m ratios shown in Fig. 5.11 and Fig. 5.15. They
represent, from left to right, m = 10 k, m = 5 k and m = 2 k.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models___________________________________________ ______
R-K- 0.1
K-R- 0.2
" K-K-0.3
-0.4
-0.50.50.450.40.35
Figure 5.14: Phase speeds of the three modes generated by the flows shown in Fig. 5.12. The
solid line is the Kelvin wave localized near y = b, the dashed line shows the dispersion
curve of the Kelvin wave a t y = —b, and the dotted line is the phase speed of the
kink-generated Rossby wave as a function of k. Here b = 1, ei — 0.2 and tz = 0.4.
The results obtained so far can thus be interpreted as resonances between the various
waves generated by the flow. By comparing Fig. 5.8, Fig. 5.11, and Fig. 5.13, we find that
the instabilities are indeed centred where the frequencies are equal, and the interpretation
of the eigenfunctions becomes clear. At k = 0.360 the instability arises due to the phase-
locking of the Kelvin wave at y — —b with the Rossby wave localized near the kink at y = 0.
This is consistent with the pressure field shown in Fig. 5.9(a). The second growing mode
[Fig. 5.9(b)], on the other hand, is generated by the resonance between the Kelvin waves
trapped a t each boundary. This last instability has been analyzed in detail by Kushner
et al. (1998), and arises due to the fact th a t the flow on the whole is anticyclonic, which
supplies the appropriate Doppler shifts required for the coupling to take place (since the
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models___________________________________________________ 117
waves propagate with the wall to their right). We note, however, th a t when k & 0.47 a third
matching condition between the Rossby wave and the Kelvin wave a t y = +b is present,
and yet no instability was found in this region. The reason is th a t although the frequencies
coincide, the waves’ difference energy is of the same sign. This fact is confirmed by noting
th a t the sign of the difference energy is opposite to th a t of c_1dc/dl:, where c is the phase
speed (Hayashi and Young, 1987). Figure 5.14 clearly shows th a t both the Rossby wave
and the northern Kelvin wave have positive difference energy when k s» 0.47.
Kushner et al. (1998) have noted th a t unless -C f * / N ’, an unphysical “mirage
wave” develops in the GM model. This boundary-trapped wave is a product of the formula
tion itself, and leads to an unrealistic mode in which the particles remain motionless in the
presence of a nonvanishing perturbation pressure. Whereas in the Boussinesq model the
flow becomes stable as |m*/fc*| ->• 0, in GM theory both instabilities are present and con
tinue to grow. Figure 5.15 shows how the growth rates behave in both the Boussinesq and
GM models as a decreases. The Boussinesq instabilities become weaker and shift towards
higher wavenumbers relative to the GM modes. Although both GM instabilities become
unphysical, the mirage wave-mirage wave resonance only involves spurious modes. The
Kelvin wave-Rossby wave (K-R) mode, on the other hand, subsists even as one approaches
the nondivergent lim it (which can be obtained by making m = 0 in (3.16b)), and thus
interaction between “real” and “mirage” modes takes place.
5.7 Stability o f an equatorial H yper-G aussian jet
We now analyze the stability of the Hyper-Gaussian je t described in Section 5.3 for a
nonhydrostatic Boussinesq flow, and again consider a je t of the form
u0 = U0e - ^ \ (5.50)
The scaling chosen is appropriate for the equator and similar to the one used previously
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models___________________________________ _____________ 118
0.04
£oO -0.04
0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85k
0.08
0.04u
JSI uo!~) -0.04
-0.08
1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9k
2.0
Figure 5.15: Comparison of the growth rates between the Boussinesq model (solid line),
and the GM model (dashed line) when m = 5 k (top) and m = 2 k (bottom). See also
Fig. 5.13.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models_______________________________________________________ 119
for the shallow-water model, to wit:
( x ,y , k ~ l) L (x , y , k ~ l) ( z ,m ~ l) >-> H ( z , m ~ l )
(uo.t»i,Ui) i-t U{u0. u h Vi) ( t , / _1,<7_1) r-t {L/U)(t, , a ~ l )
P * ( U / I ? ) 0
so th a t the nondimensional iq equation becomes:
|fc2 (s2w2 — l) + e2m2u 2j Jfcojui + f v iy| —
|fc2 (s2 ai2 — l ) + e2m 2o;2j £ (e2m 2/w ) {oJViy — kyvi) +
k (s2 w2 - l ) (u>vlyy - krjyVi + k f v i y) ] -
2ke2m 2uiuy (wviy - k r \ v = 0, (5.51)
where s = (U / L ) / N and e = (U /H ) /N . Using the following scales:
U = 25m s_1,
L = 106m,
H = 104m,
N — 0.01s-1 ,
results in s = 0.0025 and e = 0.25. The background flow is scaled in a similar manner and
the r param eter is again chosen to be equal to 0.555, so th a t the to tal e-folding width of
the Hyper-Gaussian je t is 1110 km. Lateral walls are imposed far from the core of the flow
at y = ±7000 km where the meridional boundary condition is Vi = 0. The resulting eigen
value problem is similar to the one in the previous chapter and is derived in Appendix C.
Figure 5.16 shows the contours which represent the growth rates in (k, m) space. The
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a ,3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models_______________________________________________________ 120
m8
m
Figure 5.16: Growth rate contours in (k, m) space of an equatorial, Hyper-Gaussian jet
(Boussinesq model). Shading highlights the unstable regions. The top figure shows the
contours of the most unstable modes, while the bottom figure shows the growth surface
which lies underneath.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a >9-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models_______________________________________________________ 121
top figure shows the isolines of the most unstable perturbation (which correspond to two
distinct modes, as seen below) while the bottom plot shows the secondary instabilities.
Figure 5.17 shows the growth and phase speed curves corresponding to a domain of
infinite depth for which m = 0. When m vanishes the dynamics and thermodynamics are
decoupled in the original Boussinesq system (2.1). The la tter simply yields buoyancy waves
of intrinsic frequency iV, while the dynamical portion reduces to the nondivergent form of
the shallow-water equations. Since the instabilities analyzed so far for the Hyper-Gaussian
flow are the result of vorticity wave coupling it is not surprising th a t in this lim it the results
are essentially the same as those in Section 5.3, as seen in Fig. 5.18.
As the domain becomes shallower the peaks shift slightly towards smaller wavenumbers
and the growth rates decrease. Figure 5.19 shows the stability of a je t confined to a channel
which is 10 km deep (m = it). As before the fastest-growing mode is the antisymmetric
perturbation which peaks a t fc = 2.40 (A = 2614 km) with a growth rate of S (o j = 0.44
(e-folding time of 25 h). The symmetric mode achieves its maximum value when k = 2.19
(A = 2869 km) where 3 (o j = 0.29 (e-folding time of 38 h). The pressure maxima and
minima in both cases are located near the inflection points, at about 516 km to the north
and south of the equator. The shape of the dispersion relationship and structure of the
functions (Fig. 5.20) suggest th a t the mechanism behind the instabilities are the same
as before, namely, shear wave resonance about the inflection points. This conclusion is
corroborated by the Reynolds stresses and the vorticity patterns.
In spite of the results obtained in Section 5.6, which suggest th a t Rossby waves and
Kelvin waves may resonate, no Rossby wave-gravity wave coupling was found for an equa
torial Hyper-Gaussian je t given any reasonable physical geometry. Instabilities of this type
— in which shear-generated vorticity modes phase lock with some type of gravity wave —
were found only for very shallow (less than 6 km deep), narrow channels (approximately
twice the e-folding width of the jet), which are clearly unrealistic.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models______________________________________ 122
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.1
1
0.6
0.2
- 0 .2,
Figure 5.17: Growth rate and phase speed curves of the unstable modes generated by a
Hyper-Gaussian je t in the Boussinesq model when m — 0.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models_______________________________________________ 123
- 1
- 2
- 3
3
- 1
- 3
Figure 5.18: Structures of the two unstable modes at m = 0. The instability pictured at
the top peaks a t k = 2.42 and has a growth rate of S(cr) = 0.55. The perturbation
pictured on the bottom plot corresponds to the secondary mode. I t was calculated at
k = 2.38 and possesses a nondimensional growth rate of a = 0.46. D otted lines indicate
the position of the inflection points a t ±516 km from the equator. For visualization
purposes only the central part of the channel is shown, since the to tal width is 14 (in
nondimensional units).
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models___________________________________________
0.5
0.4
■3. 0.3
0.2
0.1
1
0.6
^ 0.4 £
0.2
- 0.2,
Figure 5.19: Same as Fig. 5.17 but with m = tt.
124
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 5. The Hyper-Gaussian jet on a /3-plane: shallow-water andBoussinesq models____________________________________ 125
3
;'/////,
Figure 5.20: Structures of the two unstable modes a t m = it. The most unstable mode
(top) peaks at k = 2.40 and has a growth rate of cr = 0.44. The secondary instability
pictured on the bottom plot was calculated a t k = 2.19 and possesses a growth rate of
a = 0.29.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 6
Summary, conclusions and future
work
In Section 5.1 it was noted th a t Marinone and Ripa (19S4) have previously analyzed the
stability of an equatorial Gaussian je t when studying the Equatorial Undercurrent using
the shallow-water equations. An im portant result from this work was the notion th a t some
of the resulting instabilities (those pertaining to wide1 easterly jets) could be linked with
“negative energy perturbations” , i.e. growing waves in which the net energy transfer is
from the perturbations and into the mean flow. Furthermore, it was found th a t narrow jets
were also unstable and th a t the perturbations in these cases were not unlike those which
appear in the “classic” barotropic problem, where kinetic energy flows from the mean flow
into a nondivergent disturbance (Yanai and Nitta, 1968). The idea of instability resulting
from the transfer of energy from a background flow into the perturbation no longer held
true in general.
The subsequent literature thus elaborated on the nature of the mechanism behind the
*The terms “wide” and “narrow” used here compare the e-folding w idth of the Gaussian je t with the
e-folding width of an equatorial Kelvin wave in the ocean.
126
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 6. Summary, conclusions and future work 127
instability of shear flows and negative energy waves. Lindzen (1988) pu t forth the over
reflection theory as a means to explain instability — briefly discussed in Section 4.3.1 — but
its validity has been debated in the literature (e.g. Smyth and Peltier, 1989). Concurrently
the wave resonance theory began to gain strength when Hayashi and Young (1987) analyzed
the stability of shallow-water shear flows on an equatorial /?-plane. The idea th a t instability
was the product of the resonance between waves with difference energies of opposite signs
solidified, and later Takehiro and Hayashi (1992) described the over-reflection mechanism
itself in terms of wave-wave interactions.
A steady stream of authors have applied the wave-resonance theory in a series of QG and
shallow-water models, studying both baroclinic (usually two-layer models, e.g. Sakai, 1989)
and barotropic (in which u0 = no (y) e.g. Hayashi and Young, 1987; De la Cruz-Heredia and
Moore, 1999) flows. The reanalysis by Iga (1993) of Orlanski’s problem recently studied the
stability of a frontal surface between two fluid layers from the wave resonance perspective.
We now apply these ideas to a phenomenon th a t is similar to the one which concerned
Marinone and Ripa (1984): the stability of an equatorial “bell-shaped” jet. Chapter 1
explains the nature of the equatorial jets which concern us, namely, the strong westerly
wind bursts (WWBs) which seem to play an im portant part in the formation of equatorial
cyclone twins (ECTs). Aside from the obvious differences in scales we consider another,
more subtle aspect of the profile which takes into account a variation in the shape. This
slight modification is found to lead to im portant differences with respect to the ubiquitous
Gaussian je t so often studied in the literature. Furthermore the finite depth of the flow
is also taken into account in order to investigate the effect of having a vertically bounded
domain. Chapter 2 details the models which were used to analyze the flow.
We begin by studying some simple flows in Chapter 3, which deals with the stability of
piecewise linear profiles when the flow is quasigeostrophic (QG). G ravity modes are filtered
out a priori, and only vorticity modes are capable of resonating. The depth of the flow,
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 6. Summary, conclusions and future work 128
set through the vertical wavenumber m , is of little consequence regarding the nature of the
instabilities, and in fact enters the potential vorticity equation in a trivial manner (through
an “equivalent” wavenumber which we labelled //). Instability is solely the result of phase
locking between waves resulting from the discontinuities in the meridional gradient of the
shear. Wave resonance analysis on piecewise linear flows with more than two discontinu
ities in the curvature of the basic velocity field (i.e. “kinks” ) shows th a t resonance can
take place between more than two localized waves. Depending on the wavenumber (and
hence on the meridional extent of the “free” modes), a “compound” instability resulting
from two simultaneous, localized resonances can be obtained. As the wavelength increases
a large scale resonance may take place, but the small-scale effects remain, complicating
the overall dynamics. The resulting instability in these cases could be attributed to the
resonance between four modes. Examples from the literature seem to indicate th a t this
is a rather common occurrence. The transition between Kelvin-Helmholtz and Holmboe
instability studied by Smyth and Peltier (1989), for example, shows a transition between
unstable modes of identical growth rates and opposite phase speeds towards unstable modes
of different growth rates and equal phase speeds a t smaller wavenumbers, including the ap
pearance of an energy sink in mid-flow, similar to what is seen for the staircase profile
(Fig. 3.5). Smyth and Peltier analyzed a hyperbolic-tangent profile w ith varying B runt-
Vaisala frequency in the vertical using a Boussinesq model which can support gravity waves.
It was later shown by Baines and Mitsudera (1994) that Holmboe instability can be ex
plained in terms of resonance between vorticity and gravity waves. The QG model does not
support gravity waves, but in this case it is the additional kinks which provide the waves
necessary to create the two independent instabilities at the larger wavenumbers. Other
examples of resonance between unstable modes can be found in Iga (1993) (see his Fig
ure 6), and Nakamura (1988) [see his Figure 7(b)]. The former seems to be a four wave
resonance between two Rossby waves and two mixed Rossby-gravity waves (R i and Mo
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 6. Summary, conclusions and future work 129
in Iga’s notation). The latter is apparently the resonance between two boundary-trapped
waves and two inertia-gravity modes. In Nakamura’s case the four wave mixing ceases at
the lower wavenumbers due to the disappearance of the inertia critical levels (which “trap”
the inertia-gravity waves), simply leaving the Eady mode (due to the resonance between
the boundary waves).
All the profiles in Chapter 3 featured some sort of discontinuity in the gradient of the
background shear, which facilitates the identification of the resonating waves (since they
are generated by, and localized about, the discontinuities), and their relative Doppler shifts.
Kobayashi and Sakai (1993) noted th a t when the profiles are smooth the instability is the
result of the resonance between the two modes of the continuum closest to the “effective”
inflection point (i.e. where /? - u0yy vanishes). Barotropic instability in a smooth boundary
current was later studied by Katsum ata (1997) and was similarly explained in terms of
resonances between various Rossby waves whose direction of propagation depend on the
sign of the background vorticity gradient.
These findings agree with the results in Chapter 4, where the stability of a hyperbolic-
tangent flow was studied as a function of the number of grid points. The finite difference
method is widely used in order to obtain numerical solutions of hydrodynamic problems
which are analytically intractable, and is particularly useful when the sparseness of the
resulting eigensystem is exploited (Proehl, 1996; De la Cruz-Heredia and Moore, 1997).
Although certainly not the only method available (and sometimes not even the most ap
propriate), it nonetheless provides a convenient way of visualizing how the numerical solvers
discern instability from the wave resonance perspective.
In the case of the hyperbolic-tangent profile there is a continuum of counterpropagating
vorticity waves generated by the curvature of the flow at either side of the inflection point.
When discretized, a finite number of neutral modes results, and the flow is unstable due
to the resonance of the waves nearest to the inflection point. In a sense the flow is the
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 6. Summary, conclusions and future work 130
counterpart to Rayleigh’s broken-line shear layer profile, where in the latter case the two
kinks generate the resonating vorticity waves. Although analyzing piecewise linear “ana
logues” of smooth profiles may help understand the dynamics behind an unstable mode,
wave resonance is unable to predict whether two modes will indeed phase-lock or not. The
“half-wave” sine profile, for example, is qualitatively very similar to a hyperbolic-tangent
flow, bu t is stable.
The above procedure is nonetheless useful in understanding the instabilities arising
in Gaussian and Hyper-Gaussian jets, which result in growing modes whose structures are
mostly localized about each inflection point, resulting in a symmetric and an anti-symmetric
perturbation with nearly the same growth rates. For “wide” jets, such as the Hyper-
Gaussian profile, the individual resonances become better defined, with the symmetric
mode “splitting” into two, in-phase trains of highs and lows a t opposite latitudes with
respect to the centre of the jet.
The stability of the Hyper-Gaussian profile on a /?-plane does not differ much from the
/-p lane results, no m atter what the direction of the je t is. This is due to the scales used,
which were chosen according to the values set by an equatorial W WB. The effect of the
background vorticity gradient was small compared to th a t of the curvature of the shear,
and the instabilities themselves remained essentially unchanged except for the long-wave
cutoff of the symmetric mode.
The QG approximation does not allow us to model flows a t the equator unless the depth-
independent barotropic equation is used. Furthermore, neither model supports Kelvin or
gravity waves. In order to bypass the latter lim itation the shallow-water (SW) equations
provide a dynamical framework which, aside from being able to deal with the vanishing
of the Coriolis parameter, also support dynamics which are not present in the QG regime.
New types of waves which were previously filtered out at O(Ro) are now present in the
form of the Yanai, Kelvin and gravity waves, as seen in Chapter 5.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 6. Summary, conclusions and future work 131
Using scales similar to that of a WWB, however, shows th a t these waves have essentially
no effect on the shear-generated modes which appear in the QG case. This is due to the fact
th a t the Froude number is small and hence the phase speeds of the gravity modes are well
beyond those of the shear waves, so th a t no resonance can take place given the relatively
small Doppler shifts. There is, nonetheless, an im portant effect due to the location o f the
je t a t the equator in which the symmetric and anti-symmetric modes are “interchanged,”
although the growth rate curves remain essentially the same. The reason behind this be
haviour can be understood in terms of the perturbation’s wind fields. On an /-p lane located
in the northern hemisphere, say, the symmetric mode consists of two cyclones which imply
the existence of symmetric pressure lows. At the equator the wind fields remain unchanged,
and in order to maintain the sense of rotation in the southern hemisphere the sign of the
pressure field must switch. The same argument applies to the anti-symmetric mode and
hence the exchange of the mode structures. The symmetric mode is no longer the most
unstable, and the dominance of the anti-symmetric instability suggests th a t the appearance
of single cyclones should be most common as the result of a WWB. This has indeed been
observed to be the case (Hartten, 1996), as nearly 67% of the observed WWBs in the 1980s
have preceded the formation of individual cyclones. The mechanism which determines the
final structure cannot be obtained from the above analysis, although heating may certainly
play a role (see below). Another factor is the initial effect of non-modal disturbances which
can shift dominance between modes during the early stages of growth. Farrell (1984) has
noted th a t the growth rate of non-modal disturbances (whose structures change with time)
can initially be much larger than th a t of the normal modes, with the latter dominating at
greater times. In the interim, however, the non-modal disturbances may interact with the
modal waves in a manner which ultimately favours one normal mode over the other.
Using a nonhydrostatic Boussinesq model the effects of channel depth and gravity waves
can be readably incorporated. The former in particular is of special relevance since it is
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 6. Summary, conclusions and future work 1 3 2
shown th a t resonances between shear and gravity modes can take place by modifying the
depth of the channel through the vertical wavenumber m (which is inversely proportional
to the height once the fundamental mode is chosen). A Hyper-Gaussian je t similar to a
10 km deep WWB presents again a symmetric and an anti-symmetric mode. The latter,
which has an e-folding time of 25 hours, peaks when the wavelength is 2614 km. The
weaker symmetric mode grows with an e-folding time of 38 hours and peaks a t A = 2869
km. These are slightly weaker than their purely barotropic counterparts (w'hen m = 0), but
the dynamics behind them is essentially the same as in the mid-latitude case. The pressure
extrema are about 10 degrees apart from each other, a t approximately 500 km on either
side of the equator. This is in good agreement with the ±5° latitude at which ECTs form,
and it is encouraging th a t this value is obtained for a je t of realistic dimensions (based on
actual WWBs events) within a vertically bounded domain. This result also improves upon
the heat-forced models described in Section 1.1, which lead to a much larger separation
between the storms and do not seem to explain the dominance of single cyclone formation.
We conclude from the above results th a t gravity waves do not play a noticeable role
in the generation of the cylones when considering a barotropic background flow of WWB
dimensions, essentially reducing the dynamics to th a t of a 2D plane flow (the nondivergence
in the shallow-water model, for example, being established through the smallness of the
Froude number). Although /? introduces a longwave cutoff to the most unstable mode,
the peak growth rates and their position in wavenumber space are only affected to a small
degree.
Studies on the formation of equatorial cyclone twins (Gill, 1979; Nieto Ferreira et al.,
1996) have focused on the effects of heat sources straddled on the equator. Convection plays
a vital role in tropical cyclogenesis (Holton, 1992), and the results from these studies show
how such forcing can lead to symmetric, cross-equatorial lows. Strong convective events
which are observed in the equatorial regions, however, do not necessarily lead to ECTs, and
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Chapter 6. Summary, conclusions and future work 133
hence other processes are certainly a t play. A good candidate and one of the most notable
events which precedes ECT formation is the appearance of strong westerly wind bursts.
These powerful jets are capable of generating symmetric cross-equatorial lows, aiding in
the organization of the deep equatorial convection (Keen, 1982) which can eventually lead
to the striking twin hurricanes shown in Fig. 1.3. Clearly it remains necessary to analyze
the combined effects of both processes in order to better understand how equatorial cyclone
twins — and tropical cyclogenesis in general — takes place.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
A ppendix A
The Quasigeostrophic numerical
eigenvalue problem
The QG potential vorticity equation (3.4) can be readably written in m atrix form
[u0 (/j2I - D (2)) - ( / 3 I - D (2)u 0)] V> = c (/r21 — D (2)) i/>, (A.l)
or, more compactly,
A ip = cBt/i, (A.2)
and is thus solved by seeking the eigenvalue c and eigenvector
ip = (i/>(!/[11),t/>(!/121),--- ,4>{y[n]))T
which satisfy the eigensystem for a given profile u(y) as a function of the wavenumber // (or
k for the nondivergent case). The value j/M represents the latitude a t grid point i, I is the
identity matrix, and the n-th derivative operator. Five-point central difference formu
las were used in all cases (Gerald and Wheatley, 1994) except near the boundaries, where
forward and backward differences were used1. The errors for these numerical derivatives are
1Using three-point formulas did not seem to affect the results in any notable manner, but the five-point
formulas were preferred for their higher accuracy in spite of the slight increase in memory requirements.
134
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Appendix A. The Quasigeostrophic numerical eigenvalue problem 135
of 0 {{A y )4), where A y is the distance between two grid points. W hen no boundaries are
present artificial walls are placed far away from the region of interest so as not to modify
the dynamics. If doubling the width of the channel did not change the results it was as
sumed th a t the boundaries were “far enough” so as to consider the domain to be effectively
“infinite” .
The five point finite-difference second derivative operators applied to fields which vanish
a t the boundaries (or a t infinity) are:
/
d L1' =12A y
0
12(Ay)2
0 18 - 6 1 o N0 8 - 1
°OO1 ••
8 - 1
1 - 8 0 8 - 1
1 - 8 0 8
-1 6 -1 8 10 J-2 0 6 4 - 1
16 -3 0 16 - 1
- 1 16 -3 0 16 - 1
1 16 -3 0 16
0
0
-1
- 1 16 -3 0 16
- 1 4 6 -2 0 j
For fields whose boundary values are unknown five-point one-sided differences were used
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Appendix A. The Quasigeostrophic numerical eigenvalue problem 136
instead:
DL1' =12A y
-2 5 48 -3 6 16 - 3
- 3 -1 0 18 - 6 1
1 - 8 0 8 - 1
1 - 8 0 8
- 1 6 -1 8 10
0 3 -1 6 36 -4 8
0
1 35
11
-1
d L2) = 12(A y f
V
-104 114
- 2 0
16
6
-3 0
-1
- 1
11
—56
4
16
16
4
11
- 1
- 1
-3 0
6
0
-56 114
16 - 1
- 2 0 11
-1 0 4 35 j
The generalized eigenvalue problem Ai/> = c B ip was first converted into the standard form
(B_1A)V> = crf> and then solved using the M A TLA B subroutine eig. A 400 grid point
resolution gave essentially the same results as an 800 point grid and was deemed sufficient
for all calculations.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
A ppendix B
The Shallow-W ater numerical
eigenvalue problem
The nondimensional shallow-water system (5.3) can be readably written as a fifth-order
generalized eigenvalue problem of the form
A 5cr5t)i + A4(T4« i + A 3a 3Ui + A 2cr2Ui + A i ODi + A 0Ui = 0, (B.l)
where the matrices A 0 - A 5 are of order n (the number of interior grid points), and depend
on the wavenumber k and the various parameters of the basic sta te including the geometry of
the background flow i.e. F, f , u0(y) and ho(y). When derivatives are required the operators
described in Appendix A are used. The boundary condition is simply Vi = 0 at the lateral
walls.
The above system can be reduced to a first-order generalized eigenvalue problem by
137
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Appendix B . The Shallow-Water numerical eigenvalue problem 138
means of the following m atrix composition
( a„ A-i A2 A3 a4M
' 0 0 0 0 -As^M0 Ao 0 0 0 av 1 Ao 0 0 0 0 av 1
0 0 Ao 0 0 a2Vx = a 0 Ao 0 0 0 a2v x0 0 0 Ao 0 cr3v 1 0 0 Ao 0 0 a3ui
v° 0 0 0 Ao j 1 ° 0 0 Ao 0 } [ a ^ J
or, more compactly,
A v e = a B v e (B.2)
The solution of the above eigenvalue problem yields the meridional velocity eigenvector,
and perturbation height and the zonal velocity can then be calculated as follows:
iF 2hi = F 2p2 _ jr hQ (r («ifto)s - k h ^ v x ) , (B.3)
ui = p (v v i + j $ h i j , (B.4)
where T = ku 0 — a and 7} = Uoy — f .
The matrices A and B in equation (B.2) are of order 5n but are very sparse (each
submatrix having at most five diagonals resulting from the finite differences operators). In
order to fully exploit this fact the following reordering of the eigenvector is first carried out
so as to reduce the bandwidth of A and B:
v e = (fi*', cruj"*, <r2uj"l, a3v cr4u["')T.
The eigenvalue problem is then solved as follows: given an initial guess ao = a — A<r0
to the eigenvalue we seek, it is possible to rewrite equation (B.2) as
(A — oqB) v e = AooBue,
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Appendix B. The Shallow-Water numerical eigenvalue problem 139
which can be rewritten in the following way
LU«e = AcrBu,,,
where L and U are the lower and upper triangular matrices resulting from a sparse LU-
decomposition of ( A - c t o B ) . This transformation is highly efficient and retains most of both
the sparsity and the narrow band structure of the original system thanks to the reordering
described above.
We then proceed to solve the problem using a generalized inverse iteration method
(Kerner, 1986; De la Cruz-Heredia and Moore, 1997; Yamazaki and Peltier, 2000a) for
i = 0 ,1 ,2 , • • • in the following manner:
r 'B y '
y (i+i) = u _1(L_1 (A<r(i+1) B y ;))
r (>+i) = (((A<r(i+1)) V B * ) (L*)-1) ( U * ) '1
where r° = (y0)*. In the above procedure the asterisk denotes the Hermitian conjugate.
The vectors y and r are normalized a t each step to 1 + Oi and the iterations are interrupted
if convergence is achieved, namely when
|y0+l) _ y(i)||v «+i) | < T 0 L ’ < TOL, and
5 (Acr(*+P)< TOL,
where <5h+1> = A ct('+1) - AcM. The tolerance TOL was chosen to be O(10-8).
Both the initial eigenvalue (cro) and eigenvector (y°) guesses are obtained by first solv
ing the nonsparse eigensystem (B.2) a t a low resolution of 100 grid points. This is accom
plished by means of a straightforward QR transformation. The calculation is performed
over a coarse one-dimensional mesh in wavenumber space, so th a t the fc region of interest
is thoroughly but not densely sampled. Once the most unstable modes have been detected
the sparse solver described above is used. The resolution in this la tter case — 10000 grid
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Appendix B. The Shallow-Water numerical eigenvalue problem 140
p o in ts resulting in m atrices o f o rder 50000 — is qu ite high, b u t th e sparse sto rage scheme
allows us to solve th e problem on a m edium -sized w orkstation . T h e th ird and final step
consists o f using th e results from th e sparse solver as s ta r tin g po in ts to trace growth ra te
curves in wavenum ber space, increasing the sam pling ra te a long fc by 20 tim es a t th e highest
resolution.
Below are the m atrices p e rta in ing to th e shallow -w ater eigensystem (B .l) . T hey are
shown in M A T L A B n o ta tion , where “ . . . ” denotes a line con tinua tion . Q uan tities which
have been differentiated w ith respect to y are denoted as “Xy” , w here “X” is th e appropria te
field. T he identity and finite difference operato rs are “I ” and “DM” , respectively, where in
the la t te r case “N” can be “1” or “2” depending on the o rder of th e derivative.
A0 = -F~2*k"3*f~2*H*U - k ‘ 5*H‘ 2*U + . . .
F‘ 4 * k " 3 * f‘ 2*U*3 + 2*F“2*k‘ 5*H*U“3 - . . .
F“4*k-5*U "5 + k~3*H~2*fy - . . .
F '2 * k ‘ 3*H *iT2*fy - k '3*f*H *H y - . . .
k “3*U*Hy"2 + 3*F~2*k“3*f*H*U*Uy - . . .
F"4*k‘ 3*f*U “3*Uy + k~3*H*Hy*Uy + . . .
2*F“2 *k“3*U‘ 2*Hy*Uy - . . .
2*F‘ 2*k“3*H*U*Uy“2 + k ‘ 3*H*U*Hy*Dl - . . .
2*F~2*k~3*U“3*Hy*Dl + . . .
2*F“ 2*k~3*H*U"2*Uy*Dl + k"3*H*U*Hyy - . . .
F‘ 2*k"3*U“3*Hyy - k '3*H '2*U yy + . . .
F*2*k"3*H*U"2*Uyy + k ‘ 3*H'2*U*D2 - . . .
F~2*k"3*H*U“3*D2;
A1 = F‘ 2*k‘ 2*f~2*H + k '4 * H ‘ 2 - . . .
3*F“4 *k“2*f "2*U“2 - 6*F"2*k'4*H*U~2 + . . .
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Appendix B. The Shallow-Water numerical eigenvalue problem 141
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.2
k
Figure B .l: Numerical procedure used to determine the stability of an eastward Hyper-
Gaussian je t on an equatorial /?-plane using the shallow-water model. The squares rep
resent the coarse guesses (using 100 grid points) obtained by solving the nonsparse eigen
value problem (B.2) using a QR algorithm. The three most unstable modes (tagged )
are saved and used as seeds for the sparse solver. The results, using 10000 grid points,
are tagged here as “0 ” • These la tter values are then chosen to begin a dense trace along
k, using a result a t point fc; as a guess for point ki±i. The trace is also performed using
10000 grid points and the resulting curve is plotted above with dots
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Appendix B. The Shallow-Water numerical eigenvalue problem 142
5 * F '4 * k ‘ 4*U"4 + 2*F*2*k‘ 2*H*U*fy + . . .
k “2*Hy"2 - 3*F ‘ 2*k‘ 2*f*H*Uy + . . .
3*F‘ 4*k‘ 2*f*U ‘ 2*Uy
4*F"2*k"2*U*Hy*Uy + . . .
2*F‘ 2*k‘ 2*H*Uy‘ 2 - k ‘ 2*H*Hy*Dl + . . .
6*F‘ 2*k'2*U"2*Hy*Dl
4*F“2*k~2*H*U*Uy*Dl - k ‘ 2*H*Hyy + . . .
3*F"2*k‘ 2*U'2*Hyy - . . .
2*F‘ 2*k"2*H*U*Uyy - k"2*H‘ 2*D2 + . . .
3*F‘ 2*k~2*H*U‘ 2*D2;
A2 = 3*F‘ 4 * k * f‘ 2*U + 6*F"2*k‘ 3*H*U -
10*F"4*k“3*U“3 - F~2*k*H*fy - . . .
3*F"4*k*f*U*Uy + 2*F‘ 2*k*Hy*Uy - . . .
6*F"2*k»U*Hy*Dl + 2*F"2*k*H*Uy*Dl - . . .
3*F~2*k*U*Hyy + F"2*k*H*Uyy - . . .
3*F*2*k*H*U*D2;
A3 = -F * 4 * f* 2 - 2*F‘ 2*k~2*H + . . .
10*F"4*k"2*U '2 + F‘ 4*f*Uy + . . .
2*F‘ 2*Hy*Dl + F"2*Hyy + F‘ 2*H*D2;
A4 = -5 * F “4*k*U;
A5 = F ~ 4 * I;
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
A ppendix C
The Boussinesq numerical eigenvalue
problem
Mathematically the Boussinesq eigenvalue problem is equivalent to the shallow-water
system, i.e. equation (5.51) can also be written as a fifth-order generalized eigenvalue
problem of the form
A 5<75Ui + A 4o-4i;i + A ^ t ) ! + A 2(T2Ui + AiffUr + A 0Vi = 0, (C.l)
where the matrices Ao - A 5 are of order n (the number of interior grid points), and depend
on both wavenumbers k and m (or, more appropriately, the depth of the domain). The
same methodology given in Appendix B is also applied in this case. The nondimensional
matrices are calculated as follows:
AO = k ‘ 6*U + e ‘ 2*k‘ 4*nT2*f"2*U - . . .
2 * e ‘ 2*k"6*m‘ 2*U*3 - 2*k‘ 8 * s ‘ 2*NH*U'3 - . . .
e '4 * k ‘ 4 * n r4 * f“2*U"3 - . . .
e~2*k~6*m‘ 2*s~2*NH*f~2*U~3 + e"4*k~6*m~4*U‘ 5 + . . .
2 * e ‘ 2*k-8*m‘ 2*s'2*NH*U‘ 5 + k ‘ 10*s‘ 4*NH*U'5 - . . .
143
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Appendix C. The Boussinesq numerical eigenvalue problem 144
k "4 * fy + e~2*k"4*nT2*U~2*fy + . . .
2*k“ 6*s'2*NH*U“2 * fy - . . .
e ‘ 2*k‘ 6*m“2*s"2*NH*U"4*fy - . . .
k ‘ 8 * s ‘ 4*N H *ir4*fy - . . .
3*e"2*k"4*nT2*f*U*Uy + . . .
e ‘ 4*k~4*m"4*f*U‘ 3*Uy + . . .
e ‘ 2*k"6*m‘ 2 * s ‘ 2*NH*f*U~3*Uy + . . .
2 * e"2*k‘ 4*m‘ 2*U*Uy‘ 2 - . . .
2*e“2*k“4*m"2*U~2*Uy*Dl + k~4*Uyy - . . .
e"2*k"4*m “2*U*2*Uyy - 2*k"6*s~2*NH*U‘ 2*Uyy + . . .
e _2*k“6*m "2*s‘ 2*NH*U"4*Uyy + . . .
k ‘ 8*s-4*NH*U‘ 4*Uyy - k ‘ 4*U*D2 + . . .
e"2*k"4*m"2*U“3*D2 + 2*k‘ 6*s'2*NH*U‘ 3*D2 - . . .
e ‘ 2*k '6*m ‘ 2 * s ‘ 2*NH*U"5*D2 - k ‘ 8 * s ‘ 4*NH*U‘ 5*D2;
A1 = -k * 5 * I - e p ‘ 2*k"3*m“2 * f“2 + . . .
6*ep~2*k"5*m~2*U‘ 2 + 6*k~7*s'2*NH*U“2 + . . .
3*ep"4*k~3*m ~4*f“2*U‘ 2 + . . .
3 *ep ‘ 2*k‘ 5*m '2*s‘ 2*NH*f‘ 2*U‘ 2 - . . .
5*ep"4*k"6*m “4*U"4 - 10*ep"2*k"7*m “2*s~2*NH*U~4 - . . .
5*k"9*s"4*NH*U‘ 4 - 2*ep‘ 2*k"3*m‘ 2*U*fy - . . .
4*k"5*s"2*NH*U*fy + . . .
4*ep"2*k"5*m ‘ 2 * s“2*NH*U‘ 3 * fy + . . .
4 * k "7 * s‘ 4*NH*U"3*fy + . . .
3*ep“ 2*k"3*m"2*f*Uy -
3*ep~4*k"3*m "4*f*U '2*Uy - . . .
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Appendix C. The Boussinesq numerical eigenvalue problem 145
3 *ep '‘2*k"5*m~2*s‘ 2*NH*f*iT2*Uy - . . .
2*ep~2*k"3*m“2*Uy~2 + 4*ep‘ 2*k‘ 3*nT2*U*Uy*Dl + . . .
2*ep‘ 2*k'3*m ‘ 2*U*Uyy + . . .
4*k~5*s~2*NH*U*Uyy - . . .
4*ep‘ 2*k‘ 5*m '2*s‘ 2*NH*U"3*Uyy - . . .
4 * k "7 * s ‘ 4*NH*U'3*Uyy + k '3*D 2 - . . .
3 * e p '2 * k ‘ 3*m-2*U"2*D2 - 6*k‘ 5*s'2*NH*U‘ 2*D2 + . . .
5*ep~2*k“5*nT2*s"2*NH*ir4*D2 + 5*k‘ 7 * s ‘ 4*NH*U‘ 4*D2;
A2 = -6 *ep"2*k '4*m '2*U - 6*k‘ 6*s~2*NH*U - . . .
3 *ep“4*k~2*nT 4*f“2*U - . . .
3*ep '2*k"4*ra‘ 2*s"2*NH*f‘ 2*U + . . .
10*ep"4*k‘ 4*m‘ 4*U‘ 3 + 20*ep"2*k“6*m"2*s“2*NH*U‘ 3 + . . .
10*k‘ 8*s"4*NH*U"3 + e p ‘ 2*k‘ 2*m '2*fy + . . .
2*k“4 * s ‘ 2*NH*fy - . . .
6*ep'2*k"4*m "2*s"2*NH*U“2 * fy -
6*k"6*s"4*NH*U"2*fy + . . .
3 *ep“4*k"2*m"4*f*U*Uy +
3 * ep"2*k“4*m"2*s"2*NH*f*U*Uy - . . .
2*ep~2*k“2*nT2*Uy*Dl - ep"2*k"2*m “2*Uyy - . . .
2*k“4 * s “2*NH*Uyy + . . .
6*ep~2*k‘ 4*m‘ 2 * s ‘ 2*NH*IT2*Uyy + . . .
6*k“6 * s ‘ 4*NH*U‘ 2*Uyy + 3*ep‘ 2*k“2*m“2*U*D2 + . . .
6 * k '4 * s ‘ 2*NH*U*D2 - 1 0 * ep '2 * k ‘ 4*nT2*s‘ 2*NH*U"3*D2 - . . .
10*k-6*s~4*NH*U-3*D2;
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Appendix C. The Boussinesq numerical eigenvalue problem 146
A3 = 2*ep"2*k"3*nT 2*I + 2*k"5*s~2*NH*I + ep*4*k*nT4*f~2 + . . .
ep “2*k"3*m "2*s“2*NH*f*2 - 10*ep“4*k“3*m“4*U '2 - . . .
20*ep‘ 2*k‘ 5*nT2*s"2*NH*U‘ 2 - 1 0 * k '7 * s ‘ 4*NH*U‘ 2 + . . .
4*ep- 2*k"3*nr2*s~2*NH*U*fy +
4*k"5*s'4*N H *U *fy - ep~4*k*m"4*f*Uy - . . .
e p “2*k~3*m"2*s"2*NH*f*Uy -
4*ep“ 2*k"3*m‘ 2 * s ‘ 2*KH*TJ*Uyy - . . .
4*k"5*s"4*NH*U*Uyy - e p “2*k»m“2*D2 - . . .
2*k‘ 3 * s ‘ 2*NH*D2 + 10*ep‘ 2*k‘ 3*m‘ 2 * s ‘ 2*NH*U‘ 2*D2 + . . .
10*k~5*s‘ 4*NH*U‘ 2*D2;
A4 = 5*ep“4*k“2*m"4*U + 10*ep"2*k“4*m~2*s"2*NH*U + . . .
5*k"6*s~4*NH*U - e p “2*k"2*m"2*s"2*NH*fy - . . .
k “4*s'4*N H *fy + e p “2*k~2*m*2*s"2*NH*Uyy +
k ‘ 4*s~4*NH*Uyy - 5*ep"2*k"2*m~2*s"2*NH*U*D2 - . . .
5*k"4*s"4*NII*U*D2;
A5 = -ep*4*k*m *4»I - 2*ep"2*k"3*m “2 * s“2*NH*I - . . .
k ‘ 5 * s ‘ 4*NH*I + e p “2*k*m‘ 2 * s ‘ 2*NH*D2 + k "3 * s ‘ 4*NH*D2;
where “ep” represents th e param eter (Section 5.6). C oarse guesses were m ade solving
th e full system w ith 100 in terio r grid poin ts which were la te r refined using the sparse
techniques explained in A ppendix B. T he m axim um num ber of grid poin ts employed was
10000, which satisfied th e k inetic and po ten tia l energy balances:
^ ( “ ? + v\ + ™\)xz = - = (P\wi)xs - ( u i t i i ) „ u0y - i ,
2N 2p2 dt ^ xz = f
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Appendix C. The Boussinesq numerical eigenvalue problem
to within 0.01%.
147
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Bibliography
Abramowitz, M. and I. A. Stegun, 1972: Handbook o f Mathematical Functions. Dover,
ninth edn.
Allen, J. S., P. R. Gent, and D. D. Holm, 1997: On Kelvin waves in balance models. J.
Phys. Ocean., 27, 2060-2063.
Arfken, G., 1985: Mathematical Methods for Physicists. Academic Press, 3rd edn.
Baines, P. G. and H. Mitsudera, 1994: On the mechanism of shear flow instabilities. J.
Fluid Mech., 276, 327-342.
Balmforth, N. J. and P. J. Morrison, 1999: Necessary and sufficient stability conditions for
inviscid shear flow. Stud. Appl. Math., 102(3), 309-344.
Batchelor, G. K., 1967: A n Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press,
1st edn.
Beven, J., 1999: The Saffir-Simpson hurricane scale. In the online website
h ttp : / /w m i.n h c .n o a a .g o v /a b o u ts s h s .h trn l .
Cairns, R. A., 1979: The role of negative energy waves in some instabilities of parallel flows.
J. Fluid Mech., 92, 1-14.
148
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Bibliography 149
Cane, M. A., S. E. Zebiak, and S. C. Dolan, 1986: Experimental forecasts of El Nino.
Nature, 321, 827-831.
Case, K. M., 1960: Stability of inviscid plane couette flow. Phys. Fluids, 3, 143-148.
Chandrasekhar, S., 1981: Hydrodyanamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. Dover.
De la Cruz-Heredia, M. and G. W. K. Moore, 1997: Numerically efficient methods applica
ble to the eigenvalue problems arising in linear stability analysis. In Numerical Simula
tions in the Environmental and Earth Sciences: Proceedings o f the Second UNAM -CRAY
Supercomputing Conference ( A. F. E. Fernando Garcia Garcia, Gerardo Cisneros and
R. Alvarez, eds.), pp. 217-224. Cambridge University Press.
De la Cruz-Heredia, M. and G. W. K. Moore, 1999: Barotropic instability due to Kelvin
wave-Rossby wave coupling. J. Atmosp. S c i, 56, 2376-2383.
Drazin, P. G. and W. H. Reid, 1991: Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press,
1st edn.
Fabrikant, A. L. and Y. A. Stepanyats, 1998: Propagation o f waves in shear flows, vol. 18 of
World Scientific series on nonlinear science. Series A, Monographs and treatises. World
Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 1st edn.
Farrell, B., 1984: Modal and non-modal baroclinic waves. J. Atmosp. Sci., 41, 668-673.
FjOrtoft, R., 1950: Application of integral theorems in deriving criteria of stability for
lam inar flow and for the barotropic circular vortex. Geophys. Publ. Oslo, 17(6), 1-52.
Gerald, C. F. and P. 0 . Wheatley, 1994: Applied Numerical Analysis. Addison-Wesley, 5th
edn.
Gill, A. E., 1979: Some simple solutions for heat-induced tropical circulation. Quart. J.
Roy. Met. Soc., 106, 447-462.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Bibliography 150
Gill, A. E., 1982: Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics, vol. 30 of International Geophysics Series.
Academic Press, 1st edn.
H artten, L. M., 1996: Synoptic settings of westerly wind bursts. J. Geoph. Res., 101,
16997-17019.
Hayashi, Y.-Y. and W. R. Young, 1987: Stable and unstable shear modes of rotating parallel
flows in shallow water. J. Fluid Mech., 184, 477-504.
Heifetz, E., C. H. Bishop, and P. Alpert, 1999: Counter-propagating Rossby waves in the
barotropic Rayleigh model of shear instability. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc., 125, 2835-2853.
Holton, J. R., 1992: An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology, vol. 48 of International
Geophysics Series. Academic Press.
Hoskins, B. J., 1975: The geostrophic momentum approximation and the semi-geostrophic
equations. J. Atmosp. S c i, 32, 233-242.
Hoskins, B. J., M. E. McIntyre, and A. W. Robertson, 1985: On the use and significance
of isentropic potential vorticity maps. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc., I l l , 877-946.
Howard, L. N. and P. G. Drazin, 1964: On instability of parallel flow of inviscid fluid in a
rotating system with variable Coriolis parameter. J. Math. Phys., 43, 83-99.
Iga, K., 1993: Reconsideration of Orlanski’s instability theory of frontal waves. J. Fluid
Mech., 255, 213-236.
Katsum ata, K., 1997: Stability of a western boundary current with curvature. Geophys.
Astrophys. Fluid Dynamics, 87, 51-79.
Keen, R. A., 1982: The role of cross-equatorial tropical cyclone pairs in the Southern
Oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 1405-1416.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Bibliography 151
Kerner, W., 1986: Computing the complex eigenvalue spectrum for resistive magnetohy-
drodynamics. In Large Scale Eigenvalue Problems ( J. Cullum and R. A. Willoughby,
eds.), pp. 241-265. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Kobayashi, S. and S. Sakai, 1993: Barotropic unstable modes in zonal and meridional
channel on the beta-plane. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynamics, 71, 73-103.
Kuo, H. L., 1949: Dynamic instability of two-dimensional nondivergent flow in a barotropic
atmosphere. J. Meteor., 6, 105-122.
Kuo, H. L., 1973: Dynamics of Quasigeostrophic Flows and Instability Theory, vol. 13.
Academic Press.
Kushner, P. J., M. E. McIntyre, and T . G. Shepherd, 1998: Coupled Kelvin-wave and
mirage-wave instabilities in semi-geostrophic dynamics. J. Phys. Ocean., 28(3), 513-518.
Landau, L. D. and E. M. Lifshitz, 1987: Fluid Mechanics, vol. 6 of Course of Theoretical
Physics. Pergamon Press, 2nd edn.
Lander, M. A., 1990: Evolution of the cloud pattern during the formation of tropical cyclone
twins symmetrical with respect to the equator. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118, 1194-1202.
Lin, C. C., 1955: The Theory of Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.
Lindzen, R. S., 1988: Instability of plane parallel shear flow (toward a mechanistic picture
of how it works). Pure Appl. Geophys., 126(1), 103-121.
Lipps, F. B., 1963: Stability of jets in a divergent barotropic fluid. J. Atmosp. Sci., 20,
120-129.
MacKay, M. D. and G. W. K. Moore, 1995: Strongly curved flow profiles in quasigeostrophic
stability theory. J. Atmosp. S c i, 52, 3879-3884.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Bibliography 152
Marinone, S. G. and P. Ripa, 1984: Energetics of the instability of a depth independent
equatorial je t. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynamics, 30, 105-130.
Michalke, A., 1964: On the inviscid instability of the hyperbolic-tangent velocity profile. J.
Fluid Mech., 19, 543-556.
Moore, G. W. K. and W. R. Peltier, 1987: Cyclogenesis in frontal zones. J. Atmosp. S c i,
44, 384-409.
Moore, G. W. K. and W. R. Peltier, 1990: Nonseparable baroclinic instability. P art II:
Primitive-Equation dynamics. J. Atmosp. S c i, 47, 1223-1242.
Nakamura, N., 1988: Scale selection of baroclinic instability - effects of stratification and
nongeostrophy. J. Atmosp. Sci., 45, 3253-3267.
Nieto Ferreira, R., W. H. Schubert, and J. J. Hack, 1996: Dynamical aspects of twin tropical
cyclones associated with the Madden-Julian Oscillation. J. Atmosp. Sci., 53(7), 929-945.
Pedlosky, J., 1964: The stability of currents in the atmosphere and the ocean: P art I. J.
Atmosp. Sci., 21, 201-219.
Pedlosky, J., 1987: Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. Springer-Verlag, 2nd edn.
Pedlosky, J., 1996: Ocean Circulation Theory. Springer-Verlag, 1st edn.
Philander, S. G. H., 1983: El Nino Southern Oscillation phenomena. Nature, 302, 295-301.
Proehl, J. A., 1996: Linear stability of equatorial zonal flows. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118,
1194-1202.
Ramage, C. S., 1986: El Nino. Sci. Amer., 254, 76-83.
Rayleigh, L., 1880: On the stability, or instability, of certain fluid motions. Proc. London
Math. Soc., 11, 57-70.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Bibliography 153
Rayleigh, L., 1896: The Theory of Sound, vol. 2. Macmillan, 2nd edn.
Ripa, P., 1982: General stability conditions for zonal flows in a one-layer model on the
/3-plane or the sphere. J. Fluid Mech., 126, 463-489.
Rosenbluth, M. N. and A. Simon, 1964: Necessary and sufficient condition for the stability
of plane inviscid flow. Phys. Fluids, 7(4), 557-558.
Sakai, S., 1989: Rossby-Kelvin instability: a new type of ageostrophic instability caused by
a resonance between Rossby waves and gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech., 202, 149-176.
Sakai, S., 1997: Atmosphere and ocean in a laboratory — experiments on geophysi
cal fluid dynamics ver.2. In Media Max Japan, CD-ROM publication available from
c d -se r v ic e @ g a ia .h .k y o to -u .a c .jp . More updated online edition is also available at
h ttp ://w m i.g fd -d e n r .o u . o r g / l ib v a r y /g fd - e x p / .
Satomura, T., 1981a: An investigation of shear instability in a shallow water. J. Met. Soc.
Japan, 59, 148-167.
Satomura, T., 1981b: Supplementary note on shear instability in a shallow water. J. Met.
Soc. Japan, 59, 168-171.
Smyth, W. D. and W. R. Peltier, 1989: The transition between Kelvin-Helholtz and Holrn-
boe instability: an investigation of the overreflection hypothesis. J. Atmosp. Sci., 47,
3698-3720.
Takehiro, S.-I. and Y.-Y. Hayashi, 1992: Over-reflection and shear instability in a shallow-
water model. J. Fluid Mech., 236, 259-279.
Taylor, G. I., 1915: Eddy motion in the atmosphere. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., A 215,
1-26.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.
Bibliography 154
Taylor, G. I., 1931: Effect of variation in density on the stability o f superposed streams of
fluid. Proc. R. Soc., A 132, 499-523.
W yrtki, K., 1975: El Nino — the dynamic response of the equatorial Pacific Ocean to
atmospheric forcing. J. Phys. Ocean., 5, 572-584.
Yamazaki, Y. H. and W. R. Peltier, 2000a: Baroclinic instability in an Euler equations based
column model: the coexistence of a deep synoptic-scale mode and shallow synoptic-scale
modes. J. Atmosp. S c i. In print.
Yamazaki, Y. H. and W. R. Peltier, 2000b: On the existence of subsynoptic-scale baroclinic
instability and the nonlinear evolution of shallow disturbances. Submitted to JAS.
Yanai, M. and T. Nitta, 1968: Finite difference approximations for the barotropic instability
problem. J. Met. Soc. Japan, 46, 389-403.
Yih, C.-S., 1974: Instability of stratified flows as a result of resonance. Phys. Fluids, 17(8),
1483-1488.
Reproduced with perm ission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited w ithout permission.