Download - S.M. Wright PPT
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
1/19Page 1
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
Proposed SM Wright Project
IH 45/SM WRIGHT
Proposed SM Wright Project
IH 45/SM WRIGHT
March 30, 2010 March 30, 2010 March 30, 2010
Texas Department of TransportationTexas Department of TransportationTexas Department of Transportation
Halff AssociatesBaker Consulting Associates
Halff AssociatesHalff AssociatesBaker Consulting AssociatesBaker Consulting Associates
Texas Department
of Transportation
Dallas District
Agenda
Why is this project needed? What is the process? How has the community been involved? What is being studied? Next Steps
Why is this project needed? What is the process? How has the community been involved? What is being studied? Next Steps
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
2/19Page 2
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
Project Need& Overview
Project Need& Overview
SM Wright Project Scope
To developTo developconcepts for theconcepts for theSM Wright ProjectSM Wright Projectwith a focus onwith a focus onincreased safetyincreased safetythrough removingthrough removingthe CF Hawn tothe CF Hawn toSM Wright bend,SM Wright bend,improved mobilityimproved mobilityand efficiency,and efficiency,
while enhancingwhile enhancingcommunitycommunityconnectivity andconnectivity andaesthetics.aesthetics.
ProposedTrinity Parkway
(by others)
Project Study Area
45
45
175
30
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
3/19Page 3
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
SM Wright Fundamentals
H a t c h e r S t H a t c h e r S t
45
C ol oni al A v
e
C ol oni al A v
e
S.M. Wright FreewayS.M. Wright Freeway
Current 6-Lane freeway & frontage roads serve over110,000 vehicles per day (vpd).
Diversion to I-45 and Trinity
Parkway reduces SM Wrighttraffic to about 40,000 vpd.
raffic reduction no longer needsfreeway or bridges on SM Wright.
Remaining local & through trafficvolume requires only 6-lanesignalized arterial.
No added (new) right-of-way isanticipated for SM Wright.ROW is anticipated for US 175connection to IH 45.
Design of SM Wright interchangeat SH 310 is part of this project.
Current 6-Lane freeway & frontage roads serve over110,000 vehicles per day (vpd).
Diversion to I-45 and Trinity
Parkway reduces SM Wrighttraffic to about 40,000 vpd.
Traffic reduction no longer needsfreeway or bridges on SM Wright.
Remaining local & through trafficvolume requires only 6-lanesignalized arterial.
No added (new) right-of-way isanticipated for SM Wright.ROW is anticipated for US 175connection to IH 45.
Design of SM Wright interchangeat SH 310 is part of this project.
This Projects Traffic Flow
I H 4 5
S M W r i g h t
F r e e w a y
U S 1 7 5 Ideal NeighborhoodRochester Park
N
45
L a m a
r
T o d a y T o d a y s s
C o m m u t e r F
l o w
C o m m u t e r F
l o w
P r o p
o s e d
P r o p
o s e d
C o m m
u t e r F
l o w o n
C o m m
u t e r F
l o w o n
D i r e c
t C o n
n e c t i
n g R a
m p s
D i r e c
t C o n
n e c t i
n g R a
m p s
Proposed Project Concept Add direct connecting ramps between US 175 CF Hawn Freeway & IH 45 Improve IH 45 capacity to facilitate new direct connecting CF Hawn ramps Provide access between CF Hawn & SM Wright through a grade separated interchange Convert SM Wright to a low speed, signalized, pedestrian-friendly, landscaped arterial Spacing provided to allow proposed Trinity Parkway connection and extension
P r o p
o s e d
T r i n i
t y P a
r k w a
y
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
4/19Page 4
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
This Projects Traffic Volumes
I H 4 5
S M W r i g h t
F r e e w a y
U S 1 7 5 H a t c h e r S t r e e t N
45
L a m a
r
T o d a y T o d a y s s
C o m m
u t e r F l o w
C o m m
u t e r F l o w
P r o p o s e
d
P r o p o s e
d
C o m m
u t e r F l o
w
C o m m
u t e r F l o
w
20092030 No Build2030 Alternative 12030 Alternative 2
Note: Daily Traffic Volumes areApproximate, NCTCOG
96,500125,000189,700212,100
100,800124,700122,700122,800
00
74,30097,200
116,200133,100
48,00039,800
107,900126,500117,600128,800
8,20021,80021,80021,900
S H 3 1 0
F u t u r e
T r i n i t y
P a r k w
a y
Project ProcessProject Process
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
5/19Page 5
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
Project Process
1. DEVELOP CONCEPT1. DEVELOP CONCEPTALTERNATIVESALTERNATIVES
2. EVALUATE CONCEPT2. EVALUATE CONCEPTALTERNATIVESALTERNATIVES
3. SELECT PREFERRED3. SELECT PREFERREDALTERNATIVEALTERNATIVE
4. REQUIRED FHWA APPROVALPREPARE DRAFT SCHEMATIC &
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
4. REQUIRED FHWA APPROVAL4. REQUIRED FHWA APPROVALPREPARE DRAFT SCHEMATIC &PREPARE DRAFT SCHEMATIC &
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTDRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
P u
b l i c
P a r t
i c i p a
t i o n a n d
P u
b l i c
P a r t
i c i p a
t i o n a n
d
A g e n c y
C o o r d
i n a
t i o n
A g e n c y
C o o r d
i n a
t i o n
5. REQUIRED FHWA APPROVALPREPARE FINAL SCHEMATIC &
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
5. REQUIRED FHWA APPROVAL5. REQUIRED FHWA APPROVALPREPARE FINAL SCHEMATIC &PREPARE FINAL SCHEMATIC &
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTFINAL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
WE AREHERE
Community InvolvementCommunity Involvement
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
6/19Page 6
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
Invited Community Participants
H.S. Thompson Elementary School (DISD)NCTCOGMLK, Jr. Elementary School (DISD)TxDOT
DHA Rhoades TerraceCity of Dallas (PW & T, PARD, DPD)DHA Turner CourtsDARTDHA Park ManorNTTA
Public Agencies
Major commercial property ownersSouth Dallas Nursing HomeSt. Philips School and Community CenterSouth Dallas Baptist ChurchGrace & Mercy Missionary Baptist ChurchPeoples Missionary Baptist ChurchGreater New Zion Baptist ChurchNew Hope Baptist Church
Other Key Stakeholders
T. R. Hoover CDCInnercity Community Development Corp.Dallas Black Chamber of CommerceClean South DallasForest Heights Neighborhood Development Corp.SouthFair Community Development Corporation
Nonprofit Organizations
Ideal Neighborhood AssociationForest Heights Neighborhood AssociationWendelkin/Driscoll Neighborhood AssociationQueen City Neighborhood AssociationSouth Boulevard/Park Row Historic District
Adjacent Neighborhood Associations
Community Involvement
Dallas Council Trinity River Committee Briefing - February 5, 2008
SM Wright 1 st Stakeholder Work Group Meeting Mar. 31, 2008
SM Wright 2 nd Stakeholder Work Group Meeting Sept. 9, 2008
City of Dallas Public Meeting hosted by Councilmember Davis Oct. 14, 2008
SM Wright 3 rd Stakeholder Work Group Meeting Dec 9, 2008
SM Wright 4 th Stakeholder Work Group Meeting Jan. 13, 2009
Dallas Council Trinity River Committee Briefing - April 21, 2009
SM Wright TxDOT Public Meeting April 28, 2009
Trinity Pkwy NTTA Public Hearing May 5, 2009
SM Wright Project Elected Officials Briefing March 8, 2010
SM Wright Project TxDOT Public Meeting March 30, 2010Topic: SM Wright Final Design, US 175 and IH 45 Alternatives Analysis
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
7/19Page 7
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
What is Being Studied?What is Being Studied?
Study Segments
ProposedTrinity Parkway
(by others)
Project Study Area45
175
30
SM WrightRedevelopment
IH 45Improvements
US 175 to IH 45Connection
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
8/19Page 8
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
US 175 to IH 45 Connection
45
175
30
US 175 to IH 45Connection
Project Study Area
175
45
45
S M W
r i g h t F w y .
CF Hawn FRWY
US 175 to IH 45 Connection
Goal Increase safety by removing the freeway curve atCF Hawn and SM Wright.This Project Build new freeway to freeway ramps fromCF Hawn to IH 45 with widening of IH 45. Design toprovide room to connect and extend proposed TrinityParkway. The ramp connection impacts (south of IH 45)include approx. 34 acres of right of way need (no impacts toexisting historical district) on 42 parcels with 8 potentiallydisplaced commercial buildings and 9 potentially displacedresidential buildings (includes 3 garage/shed structures).
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
9/19Page 9
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
IH 45 Improvements
Project Study Area45
175
30
IH 45Improvements
IH 45 Alternative #1
IH 45 Alternative #1 Design
Provide two-lane direct connecting ramps between CF Hawn and IH 45.
Widen IH 45 from a total of six main lanes to eight main lanes.
To minimize ROW impacts, the main lanes utilize 11 lanes and 2 inside shoulders. Thesewidths do not meet TxDOT and FHWA design standards, which requires a design exception.
Minimal ROW is needed along IH 45. ROW is required for the CF Hawn ramp connections.
Based on NCTCOG 2030 traffic projections, Alternative #1 experiences significantly morecongestion than Alternatives 2A & 2B. Inadequate capacity for Alternative #1 forces abreakdown in traffic (congestion) along IH 45, CF Hawn, and SM Wright within the project limits.
24 4 @ 11 4@11 241010 2 2
ROW VARIES 220 TO 500
NorthboundSouthbound
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
10/19Page 10
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
IH 45 Alternative #2A
IH 45 Alternative #2A Design
Provide three-lane direct connecting ramps between CF Hawn and IH 45.
Widen IH 45 from a total of six main lanes to ten main lanes.
To minimize ROW impacts, the main lanes utilize 11 lanes and 4 inside shoulders. Thesewidths do not meet TxDOT and FHWA design standards, which requires a design exception.
Right Of Way (ROW) is needed along IH 45 and for the CF Hawn ramp connections.
24 5 @ 11 5@11 241010 4 4
ROW VARIES 220 TO 500
NorthboundSouthbound
IH 45 Alternative #2B
IH 45 Alternative #2B Fact Sheet
Provide three-lane direct connecting ramps between CF Hawn and IH 45.
Widen IH 45 from a total of six main lanes to ten main lanes.
The main lanes utilize 12 lanes and 10 shoulders. These widths meet TxDOT and FHWA design standards and do not require a design exception.
Right Of Way (ROW) is needed along IH 45 and for the CF Hawn ramp connections.
24 5 @ 12 5@12 241010 10 10
ROW VARIES 220 TO 500
NorthboundSouthbound
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
11/19Page 11
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
Comparison of Alternatives
No impact15 residential bldgs(includes 7 garages)5 commercial bldgs
39 parcels4.1 acres2B
No impact2 residential bldgs(includes 1 garage)4 commercial bldgs
31 parcels2.6 acres2A
No impact0 displacements4 - parcels0.6 acres1
HistoricalDistrictImpacts
PotentiallyDisplaced Buildings
# of ParcelsImpacted
ROW Needalong IH 45
(acres)
IH 45 Alt. #
The Right of Way (ROW) impacts for the ramp connections between IH 45 and CF Hawnare the same for all IH 45 alternatives. The ramp connection impacts include:
Approx. 34 acres of ROW need (no impacts to existing historical districts)42 parcels impacted8 potentially displaced commercial buildings9 potentially displaced residential buildings (includes 3 garage/shed structures)
IH 45 ALTERNATIVES ROW IMPACT COMPARISON
SM Wright Redevelopment
Project Study Area45
175
30
SM WrightRedevelopment
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
12/19Page 12
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
Concept Development
SM WRIGHT REDEVELOPMENT OPTIONSPREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED:
Roadway Alignment Split Alignment Single Alignment one side Single Alignment meandering
Connections & Access Through Streets Cul-de-Sacs Tee Intersections
Residual Land Use Recreation/Park or Green Space Parking Redevelopment
No new right of way
SM WRIGHT REDEVELOPMENT OPTIONSPREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED:
Roadway Alignment Split Alignment Single Alignment one side Single Alignment meandering
Connections & Access Through Streets Cul-de-Sacs Tee Intersections
Residual Land Use Recreation/Park or Green Space Parking Redevelopment
No new right of way
Residential AreasResidential Areas Commercial Areas Civic Areas Park Areas Undeveloped Areas
Major Linkages & Nodes
S e c
t i o n
B r e a
k
S e c
t i o n
B r e a
k
Existing Land Use and CrossingsSM WRIGHT REDEVELOPMENTSM WRIGHT REDEVELOPMENT
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
13/19Page 13
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
Preferred Concept
Turtle Creek Boulevard
Meandering Alignment
SM WRIGHT REDEVELOPMENTSM WRIGHT REDEVELOPMENT
Concept Access/Residual LandSM WRIGHT REDEVELOPMENTSM WRIGHT REDEVELOPMENT
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
14/19Page 14
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
SM Wright Freeway Enhancements & Revitalization StudyConcept Enhancement PlanSM WRIGHT REDEVELOPMENTSM WRIGHT REDEVELOPMENT
SM Wright FreewayConvert to Low-speed Arterial
Existing Proposed
Concept AestheticsNorth at PennsylvaniaSM WRIGHT REDEVELOPMENTSM WRIGHT REDEVELOPMENT
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
15/19Page 15
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
Existing Proposed
Concept AestheticsSouth at Metropolitan
SM Wright FreewayConvert to Low-speed Arterial
SM WRIGHT REDEVELOPMENTSM WRIGHT REDEVELOPMENT
SM Wright Freeway Enhancements & Revitalization StudyConcept Enhancement PlanSM WRIGHT REDEVELOPMENTSM WRIGHT REDEVELOPMENT
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
16/19Page 16
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
SM Wright / CF Hawn Intersection
Option 1 Design Elements A) Enhanced Vehicular Paving
B) Gateway ArchC) Major/Minor Decorative Gateway Monuments
A AA ABBBB
C CC C
D DD D
E EE E
D) Vegetative Greenwall
E) Potential Commercial Development
SM Wright / CF Hawn Intersection
Option 2 Design Elements A) Enhanced Vehicular PavingB) Iconic Gateway Entry MonumentsC) Decorative Gateway Monuments
D) Form Line ConcreteE) Ornamental Grass PlantingsF) Potential Commercial Development
A AA A
BBBB
C CC C
D DD D
E EE E
F FF F
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
17/19Page 17
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
Monuments and Gateways
Neighborhood Gateways
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
18/19Page 18
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Texas
of Transportation Department Halff Associates, Inc.
Greenwalls
Enhanced Walls & Paving
-
8/9/2019 S.M. Wright PPT
19/19
. M. Wright Project March 30, 2010 Public Meeting
Next Steps
S.M. Wright Project Schematic & EnvironmentalDevelopment 4-6 month process
S.M. Wright Project Schematic & Environmental
Review & Approval 10-12 month process S.M. Wright Public Hearing Summer 2011 FHWA Approval (anticipated) Fall 2011 S.M. Wright Project Construction 2012-2014
(Dependent on Funding) Adjacent Corridor
Redevelopment(City of Dallas)- Ongoing
Tim Nesbitt, P.E.TxDOT Project Manager
Texas Department of TransportationP.O. Box 133067Dallas, Texas 75313-3067Phone: 214-320-6245Fax: 214-320-4470
Or visit the project web site at:www. smwright project.org
For More Information