![Page 1: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance
122Sn(40Ar[170MeV],4n)158Er
12C(84Kr[394MeV],4n)92Mo
GS GT
1:Mo,Tu
2:Tu,We,Th3:Th,Fr
4:Sa
Highmultiplicity
Large v/c ~8.5%
Normalkinematicsv/c=2.2%
Inversekinematics
4/21-26/2014
![Page 2: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
First look 92Mo case, just ‘quality’Normalize on the high energy tail
Tracked GTSpectra FOM<0.8
Look closer
![Page 3: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
92Mo case: energy resolution in GT is much better at 2 MeV
FWHM inGT at 2 MeVis ~7.8 keV
Simple GS root sort GS sort using side channels
Double gated spectra (GT not full statistics)
![Page 4: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
92Mo case in GT: tracked, CCsum using mode 2 information and CCsum using just center of crystal position
![Page 5: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
GT resolution for the 2065 keV line in 92Mo
GTFWHM8.7 keV
or 0.42%
![Page 6: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Participants (>40)
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]@umd.edu
(PI)[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], (PI)[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
![Page 7: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
EXTRA EXTRA EXTRA EXTRA.....
![Page 9: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Using60Co
source dataafterrun
Preliminary!!(normalization
problems)
![Page 10: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Normalize to 1 hour of beam time;158Er case, ‘standard setup’
for93 GS detectors28 GT crystals
GS coverage ~80%GT coverage ~22%
GS norm needs to be redone
![Page 11: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Normalize to 1 hour of beam time;92Mo case, ‘standard setup’
for93 GS detectors28 GT crystals
GS coverage ~80%GT coverage ~22%
Not resolved
GS norm needs to be redone
![Page 12: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Re-normalize GT to have the same coverage as GS (~80%) from its current coverage of ~22%This scaling is not proper as more GT modules
makes the tracking (much) better
Gretina spectra are lower limits
![Page 13: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Normalize to the currents
84Kr beam charge state is 19+
40Ar beam charge state is 9+
GT, 92Mo, run 75, 0.1 pna
GS, 92Mo, run 21 _000, 15-16 ena/19 = 0.8 pna (X8 faster)
GT, 158Er, run 148, 5 ena/9 = 0.55 pna
GS, 158Er, run 22 _000, 25ena/9 = 2.7pna (X4.9 faster)
:: The DAQ limits the current we can handle in GT
![Page 14: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
If we just scaled to the beam current GS can handle then we would see
:: With a faster DAQ, GT could compete with GS with only 22% coverage vs the GS coverage of 80%
![Page 15: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Sum of gates in GS and GT for 158Er, normalized to high energy tail. Single interactions are included in the tracking, FOM<0.8
![Page 16: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Peak to background issues158Er case: Find the background spectrum (blue) for the sum of
gated spectra for GS and GT
GT sum of gatesspectrum
![Page 17: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Then produce sum of gates divided by the smooth background == “a peak/background” measure
GAMMASPHERE
GRETINA
Gammasphere
GRETINAStandard decomp
GRETINASingle fit per segment decomp
![Page 18: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Still having problems with the decomposition: Check the ‘radius’ spectrum. 60Co data taken at MSU (blue) and ANL after the shootout run (red). The ANL spectrum looks better, the new basis puts more points between boundaries and less localized points near boundaries
MSU
ANL
Same decompfunction! Butnew basis at ANL
New basis is better!!
![Page 19: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
We have the option to replay the mode3 data we took!Re-decomposed 158Er data, FOM<0.8red=oldblue=new
Slightly better; but the FOM distribution can be different so...
We restrict decompositionfits to only have one interaction
per segment
![Page 20: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Re-decomposed 158Er data, FOM spectrumNon trivial FOM seems to improve a little!but counts in 0 (single hits) are also different (4.3x10^7 vs 1.1x10^7)
Old New
Max at 3.1Max at 0.27
![Page 21: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
‘Radius plot’, for all interaction points. (this is a plot of the distance from the target
for all interaction points the decomposition found)
Old New
What is actually better?New spike
![Page 22: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Radius spectrum for first interaction points according to tracking program
newold
![Page 23: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Gamma ray multiplicity distributions
Old New
![Page 24: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
The fifth leg: the 166Ho source
Lew Riley added stationary source to UCGRETINA! Need 18 levels to simulate
We can compare some real data to the GEANT4 simulated data that we took a few months ago
We only had 6 detectors at that time, and there was no target chamber
We send real data and GEANT4 simulated data through the same tracking; the G4 data after realistic packing of
interaction points and smearing of positions and energy
Preliminary analysis:
![Page 25: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Higher energies
The continuum is really well reproduced!Does this mean that there is a future forcontinuum spectroscopy using GT or AGATA?
![Page 26: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Low energy region, ICC added to G4 spectra by hand
The 184 keV is much better; but the 81 keV lineIs cut by some thresholds in GT. The extra lines in the G4 spectrum gets stronger at low energiesfor some reason
![Page 27: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
First look at 158Er, just ‘quality’::normalize on the high energy tail
Tracked GTSpectra FOM<0.8
![Page 28: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Shootout experiment; gsfma315 4/21-26/2014
The PROPOSAL was: We propose to firmly establish the performance of the decomposition and gamma--ray tracking algorithms by comparing the GRETINA to
the Gammasphere gamma--ray detector array, under the same conditions, using the following two reactions
The two reactions are complementary. Indeed, the first reaction will allow us to extract the performance of the decomposition and tracking
algorithms at high gamma--ray multiplicity at a moderate recoil velocity. The second reaction will allow us to evaluate the Doppler reconstruction capability, based on tracking, in the case of high recoil velocities, but at a
moderate multiplicity of gamma rays. The experimental results will be compared to GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations.
122Sn(40Ar[170MeV],4n)158Er
12C(84Kr[394MeV],4n)92Mo
![Page 29: Shootout experiment GSFMA315 at a glance 122 Sn( 40 Ar[170MeV],4n) 158 Er 12 C( 84 Kr[394MeV],4n) 92 Mo GSGT 1:Mo,Tu 2:Tu,We,Th 3:Th,Fr 4:Sa High multiplicity](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/5697bfc91a28abf838ca9318/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
GT resolution for the 2065 keV line in 92Mo