Download - SGTS Statewide Gambling Therapy Service Alwin Chong, Peter Harvey, Sue Bertossa & Josh Wilson
overview
1. SGTS programme background
2. engagement of Aboriginal people in consultations
3. modification of assessment & treatment
4. the Australian Indigenous Problem Gambling Index (AIPGI) survey
5. findings to date
6. future work
3
SGTS context
• CBT based treatment for gambling disorder (now a mental health / addictive disorder in DSM5)
• exposure therapy to overcome the urge to gamble
• funded to treat around 400 clients a year…8-12 sessions in outpatient and inpatient facilities
• evidence of successful outcomes over many years of ongoing work
4
Community engagement
• SA Office for Problem Gambling
• CALD project• project officer (PGSI study)
• Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies
• Ceduna community survey• project report
5
project background
• in 2007 SGTS was funded through the SA Office for Problem Gambling to increase access to treatment for Aboriginal people
• to 2007 only a few Aboriginal people had received support from the service in the previous 10 years
• in 2010 over 30 people were registered with the service
6
Early involvement
• background to the Ceduna project• few Aboriginal people accessing help services• need to improve access to treatment• why / how involved• the main issues for community engagement• connections between gambling, tobacco and
alcohol• what we set out to achieve• CBT and money management barriers
8
Early involvement
•working in a collaborative manner•taking time to connect and explain•regular visits to and contact with communities•building trust and confidence•identifying the ‘urge’ to gamble as central
9
Process
•Sue Bertossa’s role•engaging local champions (Peter Miller)•local workshops (art, discussion groups)•introducing gambling issues in context•recruitment of a project officer to expand the work and collect survey data (football clubs)
10
• work mainly in Ceduna to explore PG
• community surveys
• literature review and report
• leading to a focus on assessment and treatment approaches to suit Aboriginal people
• high proportion of Aboriginal residents• mixed living styles, township/homelands/remote• mixed groups, Kokatha, Wirangu, Mirning, Pitjantjatjara
initial resistance…• PG competing with many other needs and priorities eg alcohol abuse, family
violence• discussions of PG confronting for workers/managers who are experiencing PG
themselves
11
Initial Ceduna street survey
1. 48 people interviewed about gambling • more females (69%)
2. most popular forms of gambling • 88% pokies, 28% race betting, 21% private card playing
3. chief motivations • “excitement of winning” (37%) • “needing to relax or escape” (28%)
4. gambling overwhelmingly associated with negative community impact ie…
• losses causing financial hardship, family conflict and break up• gambling coming ahead of other responsibilities• Aboriginal people are over-represented in gambling venues
12
Emerging themes
Financial hardship
•“behind in bills”, “no food in cupboards”, •“waste so much money, don’t realise it at the time”
Personal responsibilities
•“I hate seeing my kids missing out”, “leaving my kids here, there and everywhere”, “kids standing outside pokie areas, waiting for parents”
13
Emerging themes
family and cultural breakdown
•“I don’t see my Mum any more, can’t have a yarn with my sisters”, “arguments about money for pokies”, “ No families, no hunting”, “it’s killing people, taking their culture away”
over-representation
•“Aboriginal people are the main people in the pokies, they starve then”, “Pokies is always 90% Aboriginal”, “The pokies is packed out with Aboriginal people” &
•“only white people win on pokies”
Community engagement
art workshops•series of community-developed posters, creating home-based messages
community forums•developing a platform for community discussion and recognition of problem gambling as a social health issue
collaboration•partnership with Indigenous-controlled health service
15
16
PGSI Project
22
PGSI process and outcomes
1. survey modifications via consultations based on identified need for changes to wording
2. testing and confirming suggested changes in a range of community settings
3. run survey
4. validity, internal reliability (Cronbach’s Alpha)
23
Examples of cultural Adaptation
Q2 How often have you bet more than you could really afford to lose?
Do you ever gamble more than you want to?
24
Example of simplification
Q3 When you gambled, did you go back another day to try to win back the money you lost?
After losing, do you return and try to win it back?
25
The new version meant that people identified more readily with the modified questions and were happy to complete the survey…
•language more acceptable•key words relating more to the culture•images & scoring format connecting with Aboriginal people
26
Never SomeTimes
Mostof thetime
Always
Do you ever gamble more than you want to?
Do you need to gamble with more money to keep getting a buzz?
After losing do you return and try to win your money back?
Have you borrowed money or sold things so you can gamble?
Have you felt that you might have a problem with gambling?
Does your gambling stress you out or lead to other health problems?
Have other people complained about your gambling?
is your gambling causing money problems for you or your mob?
Have you ever felt guilty about your gambling?
Thinking about the past 12 months, please answer the following questions. Mark your answers with a circle or cross.
27
demographics
28
Gender Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative %
Male 146 48.5 48.5 48.5Female 154 51.2 51.2 99.7Unknown 1 .3 .3 100.0Total 301 100.0 100.0
Age Group Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative %
Under 25 54 17.9 17.9 17.925-34 yrs 69 22.9 22.9 40.935-44 yrs 66 21.9 21.9 62.845-54 yrs 62 20.6 20.6 83.455-64 yrs 33 11.0 11.0 94.465 & Over 17 5.6 5.6 100.0Total 301 100.0 100.0
Type of gambling activity…
29
Type of gambling
Frequency Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
no data 78 25.9 25.9 25.9
poker machines 181 60.1 60.1 86.0
horse and/or grey hound racing
23 7.6 7.6 93.7
sports betting 5 1.7 1.7 95.3
casino games eg roulette 5 1.7 1.7 97.0
private card games 1 .3 .3 97.3
other 4 1.3 1.3 98.7
unknown 4 1.3 1.3 100.0
Total 301 100.0 100.0
AIPGI scale consistency
32
Total Variance Explained…(initial Eigenvalues)
Component Total % of Variance Cumulative %1 5.623 62.481 62.481
2 .606 6.732 69.213 3 .571 6.342 75.555 4 .493 5.481 81.036 5 .484 5.382 86.417 6 .373 4.145 90.562 7 .327 3.637 94.199 8 .304 3.374 97.573 9 .218 2.427 100.000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
AIPGI modified questions
eigenvalues from a principal components analysis
•eigenvalue ≅ amount of variance in the data accounted for or explained by the factor
Rules
•retain factors for eigenvalues >1•use scree plot to visualise components•check variance explained
33
Cronbach’s Alpha (n = 9 questions of the scale)
Standard PGSI
Reliability Statistic: Cronbach's Alpha = 0.84
35
modified AIPGI
Reliability Statistic: Cronbach's Alpha = 0.92
future work
1. extend testing of the tool
2. publish validation study
3. wider community application
4. further treatment adjustments
5. exploring links between gambling & tobacco and alcohol use, anxiety and depression
36
project outcomes
Bertossa S, Harvey PW, Smith D, Chong A. A Preliminary Adaptation of the Problem Gambling Severity Index for Australian Indigenous peoples: Internal Reliability and Construct Validity. ANZJPH. 2014;in submission.
Bertossa S, Harvey PW. Measuring problem gambling in Indigenous communities: An Australian response to the research dilemmas. Australian Aboriginal Studies. 2012;2:21-30.
Bertossa S, Miller P, Chong A, Harvey PW. Gambling in a remote Aboriginal setting – the good, the bad and the ugly. Aboriginal and Islander Health Worker Journal. 2010;34(4):10-3.
Harvey PW, Bertossa S. Adapting Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Indigenous Gamblers. In: McIntyre PE, editor. General Practice and Primary Health Care; July; Melbourne2009.
Harvey PW, Bertossa S. Report to AIATSIS on outcomes of an investigation into the impact of gambling on Aboriginal communities. Adelaide2010.
37
Summary
exemplar of Indigenous community engagement relevance of materials and approach of team consultation and validation re modifications testing of new tool validation of internal validity and structure model applied for the CTG tobacco intervention (gambling,
tobacco and alcohol linkages) questions and discussion
Thanks
38