Download - Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Rural to UrbanLecture 21
8 April 2014
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Structural viewpoint
We expect uneven growth and development. Some regions andsome sectors of the economy will develop first and grow fastest.
This structural transformation is an integral part of developingcountries.
To study it, must disaggregate economy and look at individualmarkets, sectors.
Yet, must remember that markets are tied. And none operate infull isolation of the others.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Agricultural sector
The agricultural sector is typically the largest. Though represents alarger share of the population than it does the share of income.Poverty widespread.
Most people in rural areas connected in agriculture — land owner,farmer, tenant farmer, hired labor, supplier, etc.
Makes sense to study rural areas first.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Formal and informal urban sectors
The existence of a nontrivial informal sectors is a unique feature ofdeveloping economics.
Formal sector where workers and firms operate under accepted setof rules (laws) and regulations imposed by the government.
Workers are sometimes unionized.
Firms are required to pay minimum wages, conform to safetystandards, provide pensions, etc.
Firms pay taxes.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Formal and Informal urban sectors
Formal sector bears close resemblance to economic activity indeveloped countries.
Firms have records and firms are relatively tangible entities.
Can issue shares of stock, pay dividends, they can be audited,protected by bankruptcy laws of country.
Entry into formal sector is costly — thus expect firms of aminimum size to needed to cover setup costs (paperwork of legalentity).
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Informal Sector
A loose amalgam of small scale organizations that escape the coverof many of the regulations of the formal sector and do not receiveaccess to privileged facilities.
No minimum wage, no retirement plans, no unemploymentinsurance, no safety regulations.
Generally do not pay taxes and receive no government support.
Costly to monitor and enforce regulations so governments “lookthe other way”.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Informal Sector
Firms in this sector exist in a shadowy penumbra.
Yet, enormous fraction of labor force works within the informalsector.
Usually small scale operations. Setup costs are low. Advanced taxpayments unnecessary, though occasional bribe may be needed.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Agriculture
Tax authorities have no way to observe how much output a farmerproduces, so output is untaxed.
Income is taxed in U.S.
Rural areas in developing countries typically do not have publicpension programs, minimum wages, unemployment insurance . . .
But, a collection of informal institutions creates substitutes for themissing sources of support.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Organization
Production is organized in a variety of ways.
I Family farms. Own consumption and cash crops.
I Large ownership cultivators (corporate farms).
I Tenant farmers (lease land from landowner)
I Labors work for wages or commission on the land of others.
I The landless.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
the ICRISAT Villages
Useful example of agricultural villages in India.
Read on your own
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Rural–urban interaction
This section offers a historical perspective on theories ofdevelopment economics.
Describes two fundamental resource flows.
Presents the Lewis Model.
Arthur Lewis shared the Nobel Prize with T.W. Schultz in 1979.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Two Fundamental resource flows
Two critical resource flows from agricultural sector:
1. Food. Agriculture must produce food needed by urban sector.
2. Labor the supply of labor for industry comes from theagricultural sector.
Thus, the agricultural sector has important effects onnon–agricultural sector.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
The Lewis Model
Most important concept: dual labor markets
Dual in the sense of non–competing.
The idea of dual labor market is important, no one (except Ray)uses the Lewis Model.
So we will skip the Lewis model and you are not responsible for thematerial.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Rural–urban migration
We observe:
1. Large wage gap between rural and urban sectors. Wages highin urban sector.
2. Unemployment in urban areas.
Basic model: Harris and Todaro applied to generate this pattern.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Basic Model
Assume migration is costless.
I Width of Fig10.4 size of labor force
I Formal “F”, Agricultural “A”
I AB labor demand formal
I CD absorption of labor in Agriculture (labor demand)
I With flexible wages equil at w∗, L∗F , L∗A
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Equil w Flexible W
Agricultural wageFormal Wage
w*
L*f L*A
A
B
C
D
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Equilibrium with Flexible Wages
Equilibrium requires that the “law of one price” hold.
Same wage holds in formal and agricultural market. Otherwisehave persistent migration to arbitrage the difference.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Formal Wages Inflexible
Wages in formal sector inflexible:
I May be more unionized than agricultural sector.
I Showcase for government policy — minimum wage, pension,unemployment insurance
I Firms in Formal sector may pay a premium — seek bestworkers
Wages in informal and agriculture flexible and adjust to S and D.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Floors on Formal Wage
I Wage in formal sector at w̄
I Reduce labor demand in formal sector.
I Full employment requires agricultural wage at wbar
I Can not be equilibrium. Workers will migrate to Urban.
I If wages at wbar employment in agriculture declines.
I Have unemployment U.
I Unemployed must be in Urban area, otherwise driveagricultural wage down.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Figure 10-5
Agricultural wageFormal Wage
Lf
U
LA
Wbar
wbar
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Equilibrium
I Rigid wage in Urban formal sector thus produces anequilibrium in which workers voluntarily migrate from rural tourban areas.
I But face some chance of unemployment in Urban area.
I Unemployment equilibrates the market.
I Worker choices: be employed in agricultural market for lowwage or move to city and gamble on securing high wage.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Harris–Todaro Equilibrium
I Probability of getting job in urban area depends on ratio ofvacancies to job seekers.
I Let p be the probability obtaining job in formal sector.
I Let wI be the wage in the urban informal sector. Fixed.
I Expected wage in urban sector: E [wu] = pw̄ + (1− p)wI .
I Equilibrium: E [wu] = wa.
I Equilibrium requires p = L̄FL̄F +LI
If employment in informal sector probabilistic:
E [wu] = pw̄ + (1− p) q wI .
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Harris–Todaro Equilibrium
I People indifferent ex ante stay or leave.
I Ex post not indifferent.
I A particular allocation of labor an equilibrium: p = f (LF , LI ).
I Extend to many sub sectors of urban market key: E [wu] = wa.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Government Policy
The informal sector an outgrowth of the formal sector, slows thepace of rural–urban migration.
Yet unregulated economic activity often responsible for congestion,pollution, crime.
Government policy: accelerate absorption of labor into formalsector. Via subsidies (tax holidays), increase employment in publicsector.
Immediate effect increase in demand in formal sector, w̄ ↑ . AndL̄F ↑ . Hence, E [wu] ↑ .
But can not persist. Increased gap between E [wu] and wa inducesmigration to city.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Government Policy
Increase flow to city reduces chance of getting job in formal sector,while outflow from rural area increases wa.
Eventually, obtain new equilibrium.
w̄ ′Fw̄ ′F + L′I
w̄ +L′F
w̄ ′f + L′I= w ′a
For E [w ′u] > E [wu] require share of formal sector must increase:
w̄ ′Fw̄ ′F + L′I
>w̄F
w̄F + LI
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Government Policy
Policy increased share of employment in formal sector.
Reduced share of employment in informal sector.
Yet, total size of informal sector may increase. True, if total urbansector increases more than formal sector.
Commonly seen: attempts to increase the demand for labor in theformal sector may enlarge the size of the informal sector, asmigrants respond to the better job conditions. Migration effectmay dominate the initial “soak–up effect.”
Not confined to employment — any enhancement that attempts toreduce congestion, pollution, improve health care might have effectof finally worsening these indicators. Todaro paradox
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Efficient Allocation and Migration Policy
Think of competitive labor market with flexible wages.
Then absorption curves ARE demand curves:
w = VMP = pproductMPL
With flexible wages wu = wa so fully efficient.
Harris Todaro: w̄ > wI . Increase efficiency by moving worker frominformal to formal sector.
Have policy to restrict migration (if possible) to only those withjobs in formal sector.
Employment in formal sector L̄F . Everyone else, LMA , in agriculture.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21
Eliminated Informal Sector
But compared to fully flexible wages, have too few people in urbanarea, social loss from misallocation of resources.
Rural to Urban Lecture 21