www.vivaconsult.com
Risks and Opportunities in Asset Management Today
September 24, 2010
Vermont Housing & Conservation Board
The Risks
1. Low Average Property Size
2. Modest Staff Capacity
3. Overstaffing
4. Weak Market Conditions
5. Stalled Pipeline
6. Low Property Management Fees
7. Negative Bottom Line for Property Management Division
8. Negative Trends in Operating Advances to the Properties
9. Poor Stakeholder Reviews
10.Outdated/Insufficient Systems and Procedures
11.Unstructured Asset Management
12.Non Real Estate Culture
2
#1: Low Average Property Size
• Economies of scale are difficult to achieve: 100 vs. 20 unit property– Example 1
• 1 unit vacant in a 100 unit property = 1% vacancy rate.
• 1 unit vacant in a 20 unit property = 5% vacancy rate.
– Example 2• Audit cost per property =
$10,000– 100 units = $ 100 pupy– 20 units = $500 pupy
• Self-managers of small properties seldom earn enough in fees to cover their central office cost.– Why? Property
management does its work by the project but gets paid by the unit.
– Example:• 100 units x $400 pupy
mgmt fee = $40,000• 20 units x $400 pupy mgmt fee = $8,000
3
#1: Low Average Property Size
• Solutions – Establish threshold size
for future projects– Seek adjacencies for
future projects– Standardize design to
increase replacement/repair efficiencies
– Restructure financing of two or more smaller properties into one
4
Other ideas?
#2: Modest Staff Capacity
• Affordable housing is increasingly complex– Stakeholder
requirements demand growing set of administrative and financial skills
– Sustainable design can require sophisticated systems and increased reliance on contractors
5
-LIHTC projects need marketing savvy-Can’t be run as a jobs program without additional resources
#2: Modest Staff Capacity
• Solutions– Do it right the first time
• Get the time-quality-cost balance right re: using staff vs. contracting out
– Leadership is key• Skilled• Passionate• Dedicated to outcomes• Must have standing within
organization and with stakeholders
– Train, train, train
6
Time
Quality Cost
#3: Overstaffing
• Nonprofits tend to staff at higher levels than for profits on a per unit basis– May not have large
enough portfolio over which to share minimum staffing thresholds
– Tend to staff functions rather than use contractors
– May promote on-the-job training that requires additional supervision
– Hold onto under performing staff and hire additional staff to compensate – costly overall even if individual pay is modest
7
#3: Overstaffing
• Solutions– Conduct manpower analysis
of what is done by staff and what is done by contractor
• Best solutions maximize occupancy and reduce costs
– Learn staffing rules of thumb– Hire for skills and attitude– Understand staffing levels in
proformas
8
#4: Weak Market Conditions
• Soft markets threaten proforma’s long term revenue assumptions– Difficult to get back on
track– A real threat for LIHTC
projects; less so for those with project-based subsidies
– Market alternatives may include single family homes
• Units and features may be obsolete
9
• May be more difficult toovercome in transitional markets
#4: Weak Market Conditions
10
• Solutions
– Learn market-rate leasing techniques
• Concessions• Mini-models• Special offers• Evening and weekend hours• Social networking
– Know the competition and neighborhood
– Reposition
– Seek tenants with special needs you can fill
#5: Stalled Pipeline
• Self-managers need portfolio of 500+ units to be financially viable– New project pipelines
are source not only of development fees, but of property management growth and financial health.
– Absence of a robust pipeline is a real threat unless alternative resources are found.
11
#5: Stalled Pipeline
12
• Opportunities– Build internal capacity if
the stall is temporary• Good time to update
systems and technology
– Outsource property management if it will take too long to get to scale
– Consider managing for others (although only if you are already strong and have some over-capacity)
#6: Low Management Fees
• Below market management and other allowable fees are fairly common on a pupy basis– Management fees are
often calculated as a percentage of collections. Low rents and high receivables effect management fees.
– Initial fees sometimes set below market to achieve lower operating costs, particularly if self-manage.
13
Don’t expect third party managers to automatically agree to below market fees.
#6: Low Management Fees
14
• Opportunities– Know the market – if self-
manage, may be able to raise fees for in-house property management division
• HUD Field Office Fee Schedule
• Local LIHTC underwriting standard
– Learn what it costs on a pupy basis to run your property management division. Compare to achievable fees.
#7: Negative Prop Mgmt Bottom Line
• Virtually impossible for nonprofit to have break-even property management division– Average property size
is too small – Size matters!!
• Property management does its work by the property, but gets paid by the unit.
– Avg fee = $450 pupy– 350 units in 10
properties = $157,500– 900 units in 10
properties = $405,000
• Many self-managers do not count all of their indirect costs.– Should be a planned
decision to cover a negative bottom line from other sources.
15
#7: Negative Prop Mgmt Bottom Line
• Solutions– Consider using third-
party manager until reach break-even size and/or generate sufficient revenue to have full complement of qualified staff.
– Maximize fees– Keep payroll expenses
at 75% or less of revenues.
16
Non-Profit IREM
Revenues 100% 100%
- Payroll 75% - 80%
63%
- Other 25% 25%
= Bottom Line
0 – (5%) 12%
Typical non-profit propertymanagement division
#8: Negative Trends in Operating Advances to Properties
• Advances to the properties can take different forms– Deferred developer
fees– Outright loans– If self-manage:
• Unpaid management, bookkeeping and other fees
• Site payroll
– What else?
• Growing “due to related party” advances weaken the organization’s balance sheet
17
#8: Negative Trends in Operating Advances to Properties
• Solutions– Make paying back advances a
priority – plan for them– Determine whether or not any
reserves are available– If self-manage renegotiate
management agreements so payment of management fees is closer to top rather than bottom of “order of monthly payments”
– Make repayment part of refinancing
18
#9: Poor Stakeholder Reviews
• Stakeholders scrutiny is increasing – they do have “watch lists”– Substandard
performance can yield financial and other penalties
– Substandard performance can yield increased inspections and reporting
– Poor reviews can halt approvals on pipeline projects
19
What else?
#9: Poor Stakeholder Reviews
20
• Solutions
– Pass their tests!• Inspect ahead of time• Take corrective action ahead of
time• Use third-party inspectors for
physical and file reviews
– Establish measurable standards – SMART
– Establish stakeholder point of contact
– Communicate before something goes wrong
#10: Outdated/Insufficient Systems & Procedures
• Not often a priority until broken– Reactive, “fire-fighting”
styles have little time for procedural upgrades
• When a change is needed, often bring “inside” main office rather than solve at site level – accuracy may improve but timeliness may suffer
• Redundancy is prevalent
21
Found in organizationalcultures where constantupgrading/refining is not regular and ongoing
#10: Outdated/Insufficient Systems & Procedures
22
• Opportunities– Upgrade/update during periods
of slow growth– Determine what works best
centrally and what works best at the site
• Use technology instead of FedEx to move documents
– Invoices
– Income Certs/Recerts
– Establish company intranet for standard forms/updates
– Scanners, pdas– Get help! It’s a big job.
#11: Unstructured Asset Management
• Functions are assigned but not prioritized or coordinated– No overarching strategy
that directs and links the functions.
– Handoffs are not formalized. Example – deal components not well tracked or understood over time creating “unintended consequences” – like a default
AM Function Assigned to
Performance Monitoring/Analysis Prop Ops
Investor Relations Finance
Compliance Prop Ops
Capital Planning Develop
Managing ongoing deal elements/fees
Finance
Board reporting Exec Dir
Risk management Finance
23
Partial list of Asset Management Functions
#11: Unstructured Asset Management
• Solutions– Board sets broad goals for
portfolio re:• Financial performance• Physical condition• Mission objectives• Stakeholder requirements
– Board defines role of asset management and how it’s carried out:
• Board committee• Staff committee• Staff position
24
#12: Non-Real Estate Culture
• Organization’s practices are not aligned to deliver on portfolio underwriting assumptions or stated goals– Being the landlord
may conflict with social objectives
– Absence of capacity thwarts best intentions
– Stakeholders back away
25
Failure to act as performance and value deteriorate over
time.
#12: Non-Real Estate Culture
• Solutions– Know your deal! Get
immersed in the details– Establish and monitor
performance benchmarks– Trend balance sheets and
operating statements – Know how to make
adjustments – Create multi-year projections– Establish contingencies– Have a reserve strategy
26
.
27
What other challenges have you faced?
What were yoursolutions and/or your opportunities?