Download - Review Draft
-
7/31/2019 Review Draft
1/12
Introduction
A Radome is a rigid, weatherproof structural enclosure that protects a microwave
or radar antenna against the natures forces; at the same time it should not be a hindrance
to the electromagnetic waves propagating to and from the radar antenna. The word
radome is a portmanteau of radar and dome.
Therefore it is very important to select a suitable material to design a radome as
the electromagnetic operation is pivotal to the performance of the antenna and the chosen
material should minimally attenuate with signal transmission of the radar, but then
again the material needs to be strong enough to bear other factors which may physically
damage the radar.
Radars are themselves capable of various operations and house various electronic
equipment which contribute to its optimum functioning. However all radars are prone to
environmental factors and this may take a toll on its performance if not well equipped to
confront the forces of nature such as rain, wind, snow, ultra-violet radiation, corrosion.
Hence radomes are required to protect the radars so that the longevity of the radars is
assured with no dip in its performance. Radomes can be constructed in several shapes
depending upon the particular application using various construction materials
(fiberglass, PTFE-coated fabric, etc.). When used on UAVs or other aircraft, in addition
to such protection, the radome also streamlines the antenna system, thus reducing drag.
K. Rohwer, S. Friedrichs, C. Wehmeyer analyzed Laminated Structures from Fibre-
Reinforced Composite Material. In the literature there are tremendous number of models and
methods for analyzing laminated structures. With respect to the assumptions across the laminate
thickness, theories with various mathematical functions are to be distinguished from layer-wise approaches, whereas for the latter the functional degrees of freedom can be dependent or
independent of the number of layers.
-
7/31/2019 Review Draft
2/12
Vincent Manet has used different models to compute displacements and stresses of a
simply supported sandwich beam subjected to a uniform pressure. 8-node quadrilateral elements
(Plane 82), multi-layered 8-node quadrilateral shell elements (Shell 91) and multi-layered 20-
node cubic elements (Solid 46) are used. The influences of mesh refinement and of the ratio
of Youngs moduli of the layers are studied. Finally, a local Reissner method is presented and
assessed, which permits an improvement in the accuracy of interface stresses for a high ratio of
Young's moduli of the layers with Plane 82 elements.
Steven R. Nutt, H. Shen, and Lev Vaikhanskiys work at USC has focused on
strategies to enhance the toughness and overall mechanical performance of polymer foams for
use in lightweight sandwich structures. Both mechanical and chemical approaches have been
employed with reasonable success. Fiber reinforcement, though difficult from a processing
perspective, can lead to substantial enhancements in toughness and strength, while reducing
friability. Chemical modifications are also challenging from a processing perspective, but canproduce similar enhancements in performance. Efforts to enhance performance of phenolic foam
and PVC foam through fiber reinforcement and chemical modification are described, along with
the resulting enhancements in performance.
P. Davies, P. Chauchot, B. Bigourdan conducted case studies on a wide sandwich
beam loaded under uniform pressure. First, results from different analytical methods and finite
element codes are compared. Then test results are presented for a glass/epoxy facing-PVC foam
core sandwich panel. Finally predicted strains and out-of-plane displacements are correlated with
experimental results.
Boualem Keskes1, Yves Menger, Ahmed Abbadi, Joseph Gilgert, Nourredine
Bouaouadja and Zitouni Azari worked on a fatigue characterization of honeycomb sandwich
panels with defects. In real situations, these panels can be affected by manufacturing defects and
impacts, and it is important to know the effects of these defects and the behaviors of the damaged
panel; it also important to determine the location of the defect. In the investigation these defects
were be simulated by a blind hole in the centre of the lower face sheet. Static and fatigue tests
(four-point bending) with acoustic-emission monitoring were carried out on sandwich panels
with defects. The load/displacement and the S-N fatigue curves are presented and analyzed.
A. T. Nettles, D.G Lance and A. J. Hodgeworked on, An Examination ofImpact
damage in Glass/Phenolic and Aluminum Honeycomb Core Composite Panels. They compared
two different core materials in different experimental conditions, then finally concluded that
-
7/31/2019 Review Draft
3/12
for a given impact energy, the face sheet on the aluminum core samples demonstrated more de-
laminations than the glass/phenolic core. Both glass/phenolic and aluminum core specimens
displayed core buckling as the first damage mode, followed by de-laminations in the lacings,
matrix cracking, core cracking (fiber the glass/phenolic samples), and finally fiber breakage in
the facings.
Nomenclature1. Specific Strength, - is a material's strength (force per unit area at failure) divided by its
density.
2. Specific Modulus, - is defined as the elastic modulus per mass density of a material.
3. Density, - density of a material is defined as its mass per unit volume.4. Dielectric Constant, d - reflects the extent to which it concentrates electrostatic lines of
flux.
5. Loss Tangent, tan - is a parameter of a dielectric material that quantifies its inherent
dissipation of electromagnetic energy.
Criteria for material selectionLow dielectric constant and loss tangent value for constituents are the key
design requirements since the transmission of electromagnetic energy is important.
Reinforcements here are typically E-Glass (Borosilicate), S-Glass (Mg/Al Silicate),
Aramid (Polyp-phenylene-terephthamide), Quartz (Silica) etc.
All the parameters stated above are tabulated for different reinforcing materials.
This will help us select favourable constituent materials in the construction of sandwich
model, required for the Radome Analysis. The most preferred constituent is selected
based on low di-electric constant and low loss tangent value but high mechanical
strength; corresponding to the higher values of specific modulus and specific strength.
But at the same time it is important to select a material based on the ease of
availability, manufacturing technology, fabrication at economic costs. So another table
constituting cost/kg of the materials is available, it should lead us to the selection of a
suitable material with optimum performance considering the above requisite parameters.
-
7/31/2019 Review Draft
4/12
-
7/31/2019 Review Draft
5/12
Observing all the properties above, we can see that E-Glass for very cheap cost
serves as the best fibre in terms of good mechanical strength and has a less value of loss
tangent. Similarly Epoxy matrix can be chosen as a suitable material for the construction
of Radome. Laminas are made of E-Glass-Epoxy; the properties of the lamina are given
below:
Mechanical Properties for E-Glass-Epoxy Pre-preg
Serial No Property Value
1 Youngs Modulus, Ex N/mm-2
21700
2 Youngs Modulus, EyN/mm-2 20600
3 Poissons Ratio 0.13
4 Shear Modulus, Gxy N/mm-2
2845
5 Tensile Strength, N/mm-2
415
6 Compressive Strength, N/mm-2 415
7 Shear Strength, N/mm-2 42
The properties of Rohacell are given below:
Mechanical Properties for Rohacell 51 WF
Serial No Property Value
1 Youngs Modulus, N/mm-2
75
2 Density, Kg/m-3
52
3 Tensile Strength, N/mm-2 1.6
4 Compressive Strength, N/mm-2
0.8
5 Shear Strength, N/mm-2 0.8
Detailed Design of Radome
CAD Model
Based on the specifications and requirements the SATCOM Radome is
conceptualized as below in order to fully cater to the requirement of a Satellite
Communication Antenna.
The size of SATCOM Radome is 2702 mm X 703 mm X 563mm .
Orthographic and Isometric views of the SATCOM Radome
-
7/31/2019 Review Draft
6/12
The material construction for sandwich portion is as follows:
Skin: Three layers of E-Glass pre-pregs on either side of core.
Core: Rohacell Foam (PMI)-51WF of 5 mm thick.
The stiffness to the Sandwich portion is provided by the layers of E-Glass
on both sides of the Rohacell Core, whereas the core maintains a good
permittivity for the signal transmission by the Antenna which the radome protects.
The material construction for monolithic portion is as follows:
Eighteen layers of E-Glass pre-pregs.
-
7/31/2019 Review Draft
7/12
-
7/31/2019 Review Draft
8/12
The following operations are performed in the pre-processing of radome.
Firstly the CAD geometry is imported and repaired to remove errors if any. Then meshing of the
geometry surface is done. The meshed area is optimized for Quality Index .Loads and boundary
constraints are applied. Material constants are assigned before creating the Pre-preg Layers. The
files are saved for Processing/Solving.
Meshed Radome
Boundary conditions
A Node is created at the centre of each attachment hole. This node is connected the
circumferential nodes of the holes using RBE3 element. The centre node of all holes is
constrained in all degrees of freedom.
Boundary Constraint
Loading
SATCOM radome is analysed for Limit and Ultimate load cases. Using the Loads presentedbelow structural analysis of the SATCOM structure will be performed. The radome is divided
into 32 sections to apply the pressure as provided in the report. The positive pressure values act
from outside towards inside the radome and negative pressures act in the opposite direction
corresponding to suction.
-
7/31/2019 Review Draft
9/12
Pressure distribution for positive limit Load
Pressure distribution for negative limit Load
-
7/31/2019 Review Draft
10/12
Result Summary
When the Limit load is positive the deflection undergone is 6.317
.
Fig: Deflection plot for limit load (positive pressure)
When the Limit load is positive the strain undergone is 0.002
Fig: Strain plot for limit load (positive pressure)
-
7/31/2019 Review Draft
11/12
When the Limit load is positive the value of Tsai Wu Index of 0.044
Fig: Tsai Wu index plot for limit load (positive pressure)
When the Limit load is negative the deflection undergone is 13.988
Deflection plot for limit load (negative pressure)
-
7/31/2019 Review Draft
12/12
When the Limit load is negative the strain undergone is 0.002
Fig: Strain plot for limit load (negative pressure)
When the Limit load is negative the value ofTsai Wu Index is 0.136.
Fig: Tsai Wu index plot for limit load (negative pressure)