REPORT NO 20527-03A
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICESIMPACT ASSESSMENT
Confidential July 2016
DraftConfidential
Project no: 20527Date: July 2016
–WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffThe Pavilion, 1st Floor, Corner Portswoodand Beach Rd, Waterfront, CapeTown, 8001, South Africa
Tel: +27 21 481 8700Fax: +27 21 481 8771www.wspgroup.comwww.pbworld.com
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICESIMPACT ASSESSMENTWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT ANDPUBLIC WORKS
iii
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527July 2016 Confidential
Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N TISSUE/REVISION FIRST ISSUE ISSUE 1 ISSUE 2 ISSUE 3
Remarks Draft Draft DraftFINAL(UPDATEDIMAGES)
Date April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 JULY 2016
Prepared by B. van Beek B. van Beek B. van Beek B. van Beek
Signature
Checked by J. Snyman J. Snyman J. Snyman J. Snyman
Signature
Authorised by K. Ziehl-Roux K. Ziehl-Roux K. Ziehl-Roux K. Ziehl-Roux
Signature
Project number 20527 20527 20527 20527
Report number Rev 1 Rev 2 Rev 3 Rev 3A
File reference
iv
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSPWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527July 2016 Confidential
P R O D U C T I O N T E A MCLIENT
Western Cape Government Mark Munro
WSP | PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF
Lead Consultant Kathy Ziehl-Roux
1
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 3
1.1 LIVE WORK PLAY VISION ............................................................................ 3
1.2 PHASING AND BUILDING TYPES / USE ....................................................... 4
1.3 METHODOLOGY............................................................................................ 5
2 SERVICES.................................................................................... 6
2.1 STORMWATER .............................................................................................. 6
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................ 8
2.2 POTABLE WATER ......................................................................................... 8
WATER DEMANDS ........................................................................................ 8IMPACTS ........................................................................................................ 9CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................ 9
2.3 WASTEWATER / SEWAGE RETICULATION AND TREATMENT .................. 9WASTEWATER FLOWS ................................................................................. 9IMPACTS ...................................................................................................... 10CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................. 12
2.4 ELECTRICITY .............................................................................................. 12IMPACTS ...................................................................................................... 12
2.5 SOLID WASTE ............................................................................................. 14
IMPACTS ...................................................................................................... 14CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................. 14
2.6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT ............................................................... 14
2.7 COSTING ..................................................................................................... 15
2
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
A P P E N D I X A COCT FLOODLINES
A P P E N D I X B COCT STORM EVENTS INFORMATION
A P P E N D I X C PROPOSED STORMWATER CANAL LAYOUT
A P P E N D I X D PROPOSED LAND USE, BUILDINGS AND BULK
A P P E N D I X E ESTIMATED FUTURE WATER, SEWER, ELECTRICAL ANDSOLID WASTE DEMANDS
A P P E N D I X F EXISTING WATER NETWORK LAYOUT
A P P E N D I X G EXISTING SEWER NETWORK LAYOUT
A P P E N D I X H SERVICES COST ESTIMATE
A P P E N D I X I CORRESPONDENCE WITH COCT
A P P E N D I X J CORRESPONDENCE WITH COCT SOLID WASTEDEPARTMENT
A P P E N D I X K LIST OF CORRESPONDENCE AND MEETINGS
A P P E N D I X L CONRADIE BLEMP SITE LOCALITY PLAN
A P P E N D I X M CONRADIE BLEMP PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENTLAYOUT
3
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
1 INTRODUCTIONThe Conradie BLMEP should address the apartheid spatial planning legacies and establish key,replicable levers to unlock state property. The project aims to develop the Conradie BLMEP intoan integrated place where people can live, work and play.
The Department has set 1 April 2018 as the latest date for “sod-turning” and aims to deliver on itsmandate with maximum integration and support of other government departments and the City ofCape Town.
The development is expected to deliver the following outcomes:
à It must result in a changed social and economic role for the community
à It must allow for the development of a suitable housing model, that is replicable and viable
à It should facilitate an effective and efficient government response
à It should have a number of characteristics that position it as “class leading” if not “best inclass”
1.1 LIVE WORK PLAY VISION
As an identified Game Changer project, a Vision was developed for the Conradie BLMEP thatdistinguishes it from “business as usual” for the Western Cape Government (WCG), as part of theTerms of Reference (ToR) for the project.
This Vision statement was unpacked in the Expanded Live, Work Play Vision Report (October2015), using a touchstone concept. This touchstone: The Urban Game Changer, includesPEOPLE and PROCESS, balanced with a sense of PLACE in this project. The elements relevantto services and infrastructure are mentioned below.
à A High-Density, High-Rise, residentially led development
à A Safe and Secure environment
à An open space system integrated with storm water attenuation, with well-designed amenitiesfor active and passive recreational needs.
à Bringing government and public services closer to the people where possible
à Implementation of alternative technologies if technically viable and financially feasible
à Use of cost savings through volume procurement, modern methods of construction, assetmanagement processes and reduction of life cycle costs
The expanded vision for the BLMEP site, based on extensive research, was defined as:
The Vision is to “develop the BLMEP site beyond the current amalgam of housing andcommercial activities into an integrated place where people can live, work and play in a diverse,connected and socially inclusive space.
The Conradie BLMEP will demonstrate sustainability in relation to the beauty of green and bluespaces…. and attract investors.
It will demonstrate sustainability in relation to … the water and energy resources required forgrowth…. the diversity and the resources which citizens and businesses recycle”.
4
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
1.2 PHASING AND BUILDING TYPES / USE
The proposed phasing was established taking into account the existing services such as possiblewater connections, stormwater management plans and was developed with input from the wholeproject team. The phasing of the project was established and the proposed phases can be seenin Error! Reference source not found.. The type of development, shown in Error! Referencesource not found., has been proposed as a residentially led development with mixed usecommercial, mixed use courtyards, community facilities, heritage buildings and educationalfacilities.
Figure 1: Proposed phasing of development
Figure 2: Building types and use
5
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
1.3 METHODOLOGY
“CSIR Guidelines for Human Settlement Planning and Design” compiled under the patronage ofthe Department of Housing by the CSIR, Division of Building Technology, dated 2000 (Red Book)was used as the basis for all design criteria. Furthermore, the flowing guidelines were taken intoconsideration when assessing the impacts of each service.
à SANS 10252-1:2004 Edition 2 Water Supply and Drainage for Buildings
à SANS 10400-XA Energy Usage in Buildings
à Management of Urban Stormwater Impacts Policy ,2009
à South African National Standards 10103:2008
à Floodplain and River Corridor Management Policy, 2009
The land uses, shown in Error! Reference source not found., were used to determine theexpected demands from the future development.
WSP used final phase development figures to determine the impact on municipal infrastructure inthe area and surrounding community as this would have the highest demands and would providethe “worst-case” scenario to ensure a safe but effective design of services.
The final land use figures for the development can be seen below in Table 1. Refer to Appendix Dfor a complete description of the land use, buildings and bulk for each phase of the development.
Table 1: Land use figures
OTHER USES (m²)RESIDENTIAL (du)
PARK
ING
(bay
s)
OPE
NSP
ACE
(m²)
GRANT FUNDEDHOUSING
RESI
DEN
TIAL
1
RESI
DEN
TIAL
2
RESI
DEN
TIAL
3
TOTA
LRES
IDEN
TIAL
LAN
DAR
EA(m
²)
TOTA
LBU
LK
TOTA
LGLA
FACI
LITI
ES
RETA
IL
OFF
ICE
TOTA
L
SOCI
ALHO
USI
NG
FLIS
P
REN
T-TO
-BU
Y
TOTA
L
2200
00
2049
48
1752
39
5859
9520
1471
4
2817
8
1263
361
180
1805
359
1260
181
3605
2772
5387
5
The demands for each service will be discussed in the relevant sections but reference can bemade to Appendix E for a complete breakdown of the expected demands for each phase and thefinal development.
6
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
2 SERVICES
2.1 STORMWATERThe proposed Conradie site is located within a high risk flood area. The existing 1:20, 1:50 and1:100 year flood lines covers most of the proposed site and can be seen in Figure 3 as dottedlines. See Appendix A for enlarged layout. The diagrams indicating flows for each flood event,provided by CoCT, can be seen in Appendix B.
From the information provided by the City of Cape Town, the existing flood volumes for thedifferent intensity storms can be tabled as following:
Table 2: Peak flood values for storm events
The development of the proposed Conradie site would have increased these volumes, andsubsequently worsened the possible flooding of the surrounding area.
WSP used the Conradie site development opportunity to improve (with the assistance of CoCTStormwater Department) the overall stormwater impact for the surrounding area by suggestingthe diversion of the existing Elsieskraal concrete canal through the proposed development and toimprove the peak stormwater flow in the canal.
Stormwater detention ponds are required to detain and for release into the canal system at anappropriate rate to prevent backwater effects at the current culvert restriction at Jan Smuts Drive.The development will provide 51 800 m2 stormwater detention area, which is sufficient to detainthe 1:100 post development stormwater runoff, as well as accommodate the 1:100 yearbackwater effects currently experienced at the Jan Smuts Drive culvert crossing.
The detention areas (red hatch) as well as the new improved flood lines are shown in Figure 3.
FLOOD INTERVAL (1: YEAR) PEAK FLOOD (M3/S)
1 : 5 70
1 : 10 80
1 : 20 90
1 : 100 115
7
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Figure 3: Proposed Re-alignment and additional storage
The proposed flood plain / canal will have a top width of 30m. The total incoming 1:100 flood is115m3/s, and the existing infrastructure, i.e. the canal and the culverts at Jan Smuts Drive canonly accommodate 110m3/s. The development would therefore detain the additional 5 m3/s whichcannot be accommodated by the existing infrastructure. This additional 5 m3/s will be control-released from the detention pond.
Post development runoff from the proposed fully developed site will add an additional 6m3/s to the1:100 year peak flow. This peak flow storm together with the 5m3/s, as discussed above will beaccommodated on site in the proposed detention facilities. A total of 51 800 m2 (1:100) and 25400 m2 (1:20) will be available for detention dams.
The proposed flood plain across the site will have a 30 m stormwater servitude and should bejointly maintained by the City of Cape Town and the development management The proposedcross-section and flow depths of the different storm flows are indicated below. The proposed re-aligned canal will have a capacity of 130m3/s.
1,7
8
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Figure 4: Proposed Stormwater Canal Cross-Section indicating flow depths for each Storm event
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONSThe diversion of the canal and additional storage space created through this development willhave a positive effect on the existing surrounding stormwater infrastructure. The City andDepartment of Water and sanitation have both agreed that they support the intended stormwatermeasures.
The existing canal will only be removed once the new canal and diversion canals are fullyconstructed, therefore the existing stormwater scenario will not be worsened at any stage. WSP isin the process of developing the BLMEP Conradie Storm water Management and MaintenancePlan which will address the City’s current study into upstream storage and possible managementand maintenance plans for the Re-aligned Canal. The stormwater plan will provide a conceptualdesign as well as indicate the phasing of the development of the canal.
2.2 POTABLE WATER
WATER DEMANDSWSP supplied City of Cape Town (CoCT) with high-level expected water demands for theproposed site using an intended land use of 3000 residential dwelling units. Updated layouts andland use types then indicated 3600 residential units and a mixed use land of size 28 450m². WSPcalculated the complete estimated future water demands, including a breakdown of the demandsfor each phase, which can be seen in Appendix E, which reflects the latest figures. The summaryof the water demands for each phase is shown below in Table 3.Table 3: Expected water demands
POTABLE WATER DEMAND (ROUNDED FIGURES)
ERF APPLICATION TOTAL AADD(kl/d) PEAK FLOW (l/s) FIRE FLOW
(l/s)
112657Residential (3605 units) 2,162.0
140 25.0Mixed Use (±28 178 m²) 184.0
Phase 1Residential (1189 units) 713 50 25.0Mixed Use (± 11,892 m²) 97
Phase 2Residential (1696 units) 1017
65 25.0Mixed Use ((± 16,286 m²) 87
Phase 3Residential (726 units) 432
25 25.0Mixed Use (0 m²) 0
9
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
IMPACTS
CoCT confirmed that the site is within the Pinelands PRV water zone and that the surroundingnetwork has sufficient capacity to supply water to the proposed development. There is quite ahigh velocity (1.5m/s) that will be experienced in the distribution main after development and theremay be the need to boost the network under fire conditions
The existing water network, provided by CoCT, is attached in Appendix F and relevantcorrespondence confirming capacities is attached in Appendix I.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CoCT have indicated that there is sufficient capacity to supply the site. There is the possibility ofinadequate supply, in the long-term, as no provision has been made for estimated influx. This isowing to competition from other large developments such as Mupine. There are a number of largescale projects poised for development that may offer similar land uses and compete for servicerequirements. Although there is an indication that the municipal supply is sufficient, theSustainability Impact Report analyses water saving practices which reduce the demand on themunicipal supply and these should be considered during the detail design of the project.
Insufficient water pressure was previously experienced on site and therefore the ConradieHospital installed water towers. This can now be rectified with a new/correctly sized connection tothe municipal bulk supply which will increase the water pressure. Multi-storey buildings couldpossibly need to incorporate high level storage, in favour of boosters, to supply sufficient pressureon the upper levels as well as managing the demand and minimising costs.
2.3 WASTEWATER / SEWAGE RETICULATION AND TREATMENT
WASTEWATER FLOWSWSP supplied City of Cape Town (CoCT) with high-level expected waste water flows for theproposed site using an intended land use of 3000 residential dwelling units and an assumptionthat 70% of the water demand will result in wastewater. Updated layouts and land use types thenindicated 3600 residential units and a mixed use land of size 28 450m². A summary of theupdated sewer flows can be seen in Table 4. Refer to Appendix E for the complete estimatedfuture sewer demands for the site, including a breakdown of the phasing demands.
10
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Table 4: Expected Sewer flows
POTABLE WATER DEMAND (rounded numbers) SEWER FLOWS
ERF APPLICATIONTotalAADD(kl/d)
Peak Flow(l/s)
Total Adwf(kl/d)
Peak Flow(Dry WeatherPf=3.5) (l/s)
112657Residential (3605 units) 2,162.0
1401514
67Mixed Use (±28 178 m²) 184.0 129
Phase 1Residential (1189 units) 713 50 500
23Mixed Use (± 11,892 m²) 97 68
Phase 2Residential (1696 units) 1017
65712
32Mixed Use ((± 16,286 m²) 87 61
Phase 3Residential (726 units) 432
25302
12Mixed Use (0 m²) 0 0
IMPACTS
The site drains to the Northern Area sewer which CoCT indicated had no spare capacity. CoCTinformed us with written correspondence (Appendix I) dated January 2016, that a new NorthernArea bulk sewer line was being constructed and, once completed, will have spare capacity toaccommodate the expected waste water flows from the proposed development. It has since beenestablished that the new Northern Area Sewer has been commissioned and the development cantherefore be accommodated on this new line. The existing sewer network, provided by CoCT, isattached in Appendix G.
Figure 5 below indicates the site’s possible connection to the municipal bulk main which drains tothe Langa Pumpstation and is then pumped to the Athlone Waste Water Treatment Works. Thisconnection will need to be completed during Phase 1 so that sewage from the Phase 1development can be directed to the Langa PS
11
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Figure 5: Possible Municipal Sewer connection
An internal gravity and pumped system will convey sewage from each area in the Conradiedevelopment towards the municipal connection. Detail design will reveal whether or not theexisting sewer line which crosses the canal, seen in Figure 6, can be used. The location of theconnection, with regards to the new stormwater plan, could possibly necessitate a new sewer lineto connect the sewage from the northern area of the development to the new Northern Areasewer.
The internal costing has made allowance for sewage to be pumped from the site across the canal.
12
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Figure 6: Existing Sewer Network (diagram received from CoCT)
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
As mentioned in the Sustainability Impact Report there are certain initiatives which can reduce thevolumes of wastewater needed to be stored, conveyed and treated. With the increased capacityof the municipal sewer, on-site storage is not necessary and the future volumes can beaccommodated with the new line. The final construction programme for each development phasewill need to be discussed with Kevin Samson, Manager of the CoCT Waste Water Department, tonegotiate facility operational adjustments to accommodate the expected flows to the AthloneWaste Water Treatment Works.
2.4 ELECTRICITY
IMPACTS
A summary of the calculated expected electrical demands can be seen in Table 5. The fullbreakdown of demands into phase and land use can be seen in Appendix E.
13
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Table 5: Expected Electrical demands
ELECTRICITY DEMAND (ROUNDED FIGURES)
ERF APPLICATIONRATEPER
UNIT/m²TOTAL kVA
Phase 1Residential (1189 units) 3kVA 4524
Mixed Use (± 11,892 m²) 90VA 745
Phase 2 Residential (1696 units) 3kVA 6896Mixed Use ((± 16,286 m²) 90VA 518
Phase 3Residential (726 units) 3kVA 2992
Mixed Use (0 m²) 1.14
TOTALELECTRICAL
DEMAND15680
CoCT have noted that a main substation located close to the site has sufficient capacity toaccommodate the expected load from the development. CoCT have however stated that the“property owner is required to include in the development, measures to improve energy efficiencyto reduce the consumption of electricity.”
Discussions occurred with Green Cape where information was received from them to adviseenergy reduction measures and performance indicators and standards. Appendix K evidencesrelevant correspondence with Green Cape. Possible energy reduction initiatives have beenassessed in the Sustainability Impact Report (WSP, 2016), and the recommended options willneed to be discussed with the relevant stakeholders to establish which initiatives will beimplemented to reduce the demand on the municipal supply.
CoCT indicated that various substation sites will be required in locations approved by theirdepartment. The locations must be directly accessible from a public road and shall not betraversed by any other services. The road reserve on site must be able to accommodate highvoltage cables.
CoCT have informed WSP that there is an electrical servitude located on the north-easterlyportion of the site. Consultation with the department will need to occur when the area is intendedto be developed.
Appendix I contains comments from CoCT Electrical Department.
14
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
2.5 SOLID WASTE
IMPACTS
The expected solid waste volumes are summarised below in Table 6 and were calculated usingappropriate estimates for the different land use types1. See Appendix E for a full breakdown of thevolumes generated per phase and land use type.
Table 6: Expected Solid Waste Volumes
ERF APPLICATION Tons/day Total Tons/day
112657Residential (3605 units) 10.79
11.54Mixed Use (±28 178 m²) 0.75
Phase 1Residential (1189 units) 4.05
4.35Mixed Use (± 11,892 m²) 0.31
Phase 2Residential (1696 units) 4.42
4.87Mixed Use ((± 16,286 m²) 0.45
Phase 3Residential (726 units) 2.32
2.32Mixed Use (0 m²) 0
It has been indicated by Green Cape that in 2014 the recovery rate in the Western Cape was 40%for glass, 60% for paper and 18% for plastic2. Theoretically, only 10-20% of waste cannot berecycled. This could equate to, approximately, an 85% reduction in waste that needs to betransported to landfills.
CoCT have indicated that ARTS is currently experiencing large volumes of waste. The removal ofwaste is constrained by the Transnet siding length and the Metrorail operations. This prohibitsmore than 1000 tons a day being removed. CoCT does have plans to upgrade and improve theefficiency of ARTS but there is no specific timeline foreseen.
As no formal comments have been received from CoCT Solid Waste Department attached, inAppendix J, is the email correspondence received from them.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that on-site sorting be implemented to reduce the load on ARTS. TheRecyclables and waste should be collected and transferred to a central point on the site boundarywhere the municipality can collect and take to ARTS. The central points could be in the form ofRecycling Igloos, which only need to be emptied monthly, and paper collection centres protectedfrom wind and rain.
2.6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The traffic component is being covered in a separate Traffic Impact Assessment report.
1 Feasibility Study for Alternative and Sustainable Infrastructure for Settlements Phase 3: Infrastructure andTechnology Review, Aurecon South Africa Pty Ltd, 2015
2 Green Cape Waste Economy 2015 Market intelligence Report
15
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
2.7 COSTING
Table 7 and Table 8 on the following page indicate preliminary cost estimates for the bulk andinternal services respectively. The full cost breakdown is attached in Appendix H.
Table 7: Bulk services cost estimate
EXTERNAL ROADS & BULK SERVICES
BULK/ EXTERNAL SERVICES COST
Studies required for external Roads and Stormwater R 350 000
Flood Relief / Storm Water - Design R 8 500 000
Flood Relief / Storm Water - Construction R 70 000 000
Earthworks for flood relief - Construction R 15 000 000
Sewer - Design R 2 250 000
Sewer - Construction R 12 750 000
BULK / EXTERNAL ROADS COST
Aerodrome Route location Study R 500 000
Design Odin Road and Aerodrome Road Extensions R 16 600 000
Construct Odin Bridge R 39 000 000
Construct Odin Road R 30 500 000
Construction: Forrest Drive Extension upgrades (turning lanes, etc) R 4 000 000
Construct- Aerodrome Road Extension R 34 000 000
Construct- Aerodrome Bridge R 44 200 000
Construct- Aerodrome Bridge Electrical cable relocation allowance R 12 000 000
Construct- Fencing R 3 500 000
Total Estimated Design and Construction Costs R 293 150 000Summary of Design & Construction Costs Design Costs R 28 200 000
Construction Costs R 264 950 000
Table 8: Internal services cost estimate
INTERNAL SERVICES
ESTIMATED COST (D&C ex Vat) Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 TOTALS
ROADS & CIVIL SERVICES
Site Clearance & Earthworks R 4 780 550 R 4 485 232 R 1 763 160 R 11 028 942
Roads R 23 089 783 R 25 416 315 R 9 991 241 R 58 497 339
Services R 25 463 527 R 17 112 181 R 6 726 857 R 49 302 565
LANDSCAPING R 4 800 000 R 4 500 000 R 4 500 000 R 13 800 000
FENCING R 1 200 000 R - R - R 1 200 000
ELECTRICAL R 13 300 000 R 13 000 000 R 8 700 000 R 35 000 000
R 72 633 860 R 31 681 258 R 64 513 728 R 168 828 846
1
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Appendix ACOCT FLOODLINES
#
#
∃
∃
%
%
%104#&+∋5+6∋
ΜΟ
ΜΟ
ΜΟ
1ΗΗΥΓς 5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς
5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς 5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς
5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς 5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς 5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς 5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς
5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς 5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς
5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς 5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς
5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς
5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς
5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς
5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς
5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς 5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς
5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς
5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς
5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς
5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς
5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς 5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
1ΗΗΥΓς
5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ
5∋%6+10##
5∋%6+10∃∃
5∋%6+10%%
;∋#4(.11&.+0∋
;∋#4(.11&.+0∋
;∋#4(.11&.+0∋
.∋)∋0&
&4#9+0)56#675
%.+∋06
#4%∗+6∋%6
6+6.∋
5%#.∋∀# %∗∋%−∋& #22418∋&
&4#90 ∋
241,∋%60Θ &4#9+0)0Θ 4∋8
241,∋%6
&∋5+)0
−<4 −<4
,5
%104#&+∋)#/∋%∗#0)∋4
%1%6(.11&.+0∋5
% #
4∋8 ∋ ∃; &∋5%4+26+10 %∗− #2&
# +0+6+#.+557∋
%12;4+)∗64∋5∋48∋&%6ϑΓΕΘΠςΓΠς ΘΗςϑΚΥΦΘΕΩΟΓΠςΚΥΡΤΚΞΚΝΓΙΓΦΧΠΦΕΘΠΗΚΦΓΠςΚΧΝΧΠΦΟΧ[ΠΘς∆ΓΦΚΥΕΝΘΥΓΦΘΤΤΓΡΤΘΦΩΕΓΦΨΚςϑΘΩςςϑΓΓΖΡΤΓΥΥΧΩςϑΘΤΚΥΧςΚΘΠΘΗςϑΓΧΩςϑΘΤ∆ΓΚΠΙ952)4172#(4+%#26;.6&
+ΗΦΤΧΨΚΠΙΥςΧςΩΥ ΕΘΠΥςΤΩΕςΚΘΠΧΥΚΙΠΓΦΕΘΡ[ΘΗςϑΚΥΦΤΧΨΚΠΙΓΚςϑΓΤΚΠϑΧΤΦΕΘΡ[ΘΤΓΝΓΕςΤΘΠΚΕΗΘΤΟΧςΚΥΧΞΧΚΝΧ∆ΝΓΧςςϑΓΘΗΗΚΕΓΘΗΘΤΚΙΚΠΧΠΦΧςςϑΓΘΗΗΚΕΓΘΗΚΥΥΩΓ
24∋.+/+0#4;
240Θ
2.16∋2/
6∋/2.#6∋8∋45+10
ΤΦ(ΝΘΘΤ9ΧΝΓ5ς%ΧΡΓ6ΘΨΠ21∃ΘΖ%ΧΡΓ6ΘΨΠ
6ΓΝ(ΧΖΨΨΨΨΥΡΙΤΘΩΡΕΘ∴Χ
952)ΤΘΩΡ#ΗΤΚΕΧ2ς[.ςΦ&ΓΞΓΝΘΡΟΓΠς6ΤΧΠΥΡΘΤςΧςΚΘΠΧΠΦ+ΠΗΤΧΥςΤΩΕςΩΤΓ
%#&(+.∋0#/∋<
>
>%ΘΠΤΧΦΚΓ)ΧΟ
Γ%ϑΧΠΙΓ
Τ2ΤΘΛΓΕς>%
ΚΞΚΝΥ>&ΤΧΨΚΠΙΥ>&ΤΧΨΚΠΙΥ>&9)5∗∋∋65
>%Α4∋8#ΦΨΙ
1
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Appendix BCOCT STORM EVENTS INFORMATION
1
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Appendix CPROPOSED STORMWATER CANAL LAYOUT
Railway line
JanSm
uts DriveM
16(M
R149)
Ode
nW
a y
Cana
l
3349169124
3350
2161
3079
3116
3132
112655
112643
Mupine Training College
±766m²
Anfield Village
112625
Viking/ Thor C
rescent
Forest Drive Ext.
Mutual Golf Course
3238153550
158779
158780
158774
158818
158784
158781
161677161676161675
158782
161674
161696
161692161693
161695161694
161721
163294
163295
163296
163293163292
163291
163297
163298
163299
163300
163301
163302
163303
163304
163305
163306
163307
163308
163309
164081
164082164083164084
163310
164085164086
164087
164088
164089
164090
164091
164092
164093
164105164106
164094
2151
164095164104
112658
164096 164103164102164097
3237
164098
164099164100
164101 779
164116
158773
780781
3236
Orthopedic Centre
3065
Anfield Village
±20m
Old StormWater
RetentionPond
Oden
Way
0 50 100 M
DRAWING STATUS:
CLIENT:
ARCHITECT:
TITLE:
SCALE @ A0 : CHECKED: APPROVED:
DRAWN: DATE:
PROJECT No: DRAWING No: REV:
PROJECT:
DESIGN:
KZR KZR
JS 2016/02/25####
####
####
CONRADIE GAME CHANGER
BASE PLAN
20527 C1001 A
REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION CHK APD
1:1000
A - - INITIAL ISSUE - -
COPYRIGHT RESERVEDCThe content o f this document is privileged and confident ia l and may not be disclosed or reproducedwithout the express authorisation of the author, being "WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD"
If drawing status = construction, a signed copy of this drawing (either in hardcopy orelectronic format) is available at the office of origin and at the office of issue.
PRELIMINARY
PR No.:
TEMP LATE VERSION 1.1
3rd Floor 35 Wale St. Cape Town 8000PO Box 2613 Cape Town 8000
Tel: +27(0)21-481-8700 Fax: +27(0)21-481-8799 www.wspgroup.co.za
WSP Group Africa (Pty) LtdDevelopment, Transportation and Infrastructure
CA
DF
ILE
NA
ME
:Z:\2
000
0-2
099
9\2
052
7-C
onr
adie
Gam
eC
hang
erP
roje
ct\3
.Civ
ils\3
-D
raw
ings
\3.3
Dra
win
gs\D
WG
SHEE
TS
\20
527-
C10
01_R
EVA
.dw
g
- --
EXISTING CANALTOBE CLOSED
PROPOSED NEW30M STORMWATERRESERVE
AREA EARMARKEDFOR DETENTION
115 m3/s(1:100)
110 m3/s(1:100)
5 m3/s(1:100)
110 m3/s(1:100)
1
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Appendix DPROPOSED LAND USE, BUILDINGS AND BULK
CONRADIE UNIT & BULK YIELD : DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONCEPT
Bulk = 17% Bulk = 104%
Soci
al
Hou
sing
FLIS
P
Ren
t-to-
Buy
Sub-
Tota
l
Res
iden
tial 1
(Ave
45m
2)
Res
iden
tial 2
(A
ve 5
8m2)
Res
iden
tial 3
(A
ve 8
0m2)
Sub-
Tota
l
Factors m2 m2 m2 m2 m2 m2 m2 m2 70% 20% 10% Units Units Units Units Units 4/100 4/100 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Phase A 65025 84570 72558 1904 1913 4148 5840 11892 496 142 71 708 96 336 48 480 1189 166 234 354 48 168 24 994Phase B 80350 120378 102681 2040 0 5372 8874 16286 554 158 79 792 180 633 91 904 1696 215 355 396 90 316 45 1418Phase C 20750 43530 37001 0 0 0 0 213 61 30 304 83 291 42 416 720 0 0 152 41 146 21 360
OPEN SPACE 53875 (Excluding Roads) Residential Density (Du/Ha) = 164
Total 220000 204948 175239 3944 1913 9520 14714 28178 1263 361 180 1805 359 1260 181 1800 3605 381 589 902 179 630 91 2772
Note 1: Total Land Area does not include existing Canal Land area although it is required for some of the parking provision Reduced Parking req as per TIA Methodology
Note 2: Reduced Parking requirement is different number from TIA as this Yield Table is revised after input from TIA (Same methodology is used) 90% of Retail & Office shared with Residential
38 59 902 179 630 91 1899
Faci
litie
s
(Hal
l, A
dmin
Offi
ce,
Spor
ts H
all)
213078Other Uses
35400Parking
SUMMARY: SCHEME 3c
LAND AREA
Tota
l Bul
k
Tota
l GLA
Faci
litie
s
(2 S
choo
ls)
Ret
ail a
nd S
ervi
ce
Indu
stry
(GLA
)
Res
iden
tial 2
(B
ays
per U
nit)
Rei
dent
ial 3
(B
ays
per U
nit)
Offi
ce (G
LA)
Tota
l GLA
(O
ther
Use
s)
Tota
l Res
iden
tial
Uni
ts
Private Market Units
Tota
l Par
king
Bay
s R
eq (B
efor
e re
duct
ion)Grant Funded Housing
(Ave 43m2)
Residential
Ret
ail P
arki
ng B
ays
Req
(Bay
s pe
r 100
m2 )
Offi
ce P
arki
ng B
ays
Req
(Bay
s pe
r 100
m2 )
Soci
al H
ousi
ng
(Bay
s pe
r Uni
t)
Res
iden
tial 1
(B
ays
per U
nit)
1
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Appendix EESTIMATED FUTURE WATER, SEWER, ELECTRICAL ANDSOLID WASTE DEMANDS
WATER PEAKFLOW (l/s)
SEWER PEAK DRYWEATHER FLOW
(l/s)PHASE A land Area (m²) Units l/day l/day AADD (l/s) l/day l/s PF = 5 PF = 3.5Facilities 3817 15 57255 0.66 40078.5 0.46 3.31 1.62Retail 4148 4 16592 0.19 11614.4 0.13 0.96 0.47Office 5840 4 23360 0.27 16352 0.19 1.35 0.66Residential 1189 600 713400 8.26 499380 5.78 41.28 20.23Parking 994TOTAL PHASE A 46.91 22.99
WATER PEAKFLOW (l/s)
SEWER PEAK DRYWEATHER FLOW
(l/s)PHASE B land Area (m²) Units l/day l/day AADD (l/s) l/day l/s PF = 5 PF = 3.5Facilities 2040 15 30600 0.35 21420 0.25 1.77 0.87Retail 5372 4 21488 0.25 15041.6 0.17 1.24 0.61Office 8874 4 35496 0.41 24847.2 0.29 2.05 1.01Residential 1696 600 1017600 11.78 712320 8.24 58.89 28.86Public open spaces 53875 15 15000 0.17 10500 0.12 0.87 0.43Parking 1418TOTAL PHASE C 64.83 31.76
WATER PEAKFLOW (l/s)
SEWER PEAK DRYWEATHER FLOW
(l/s)PHASE C land Area (m²) Units l/day l/day AADD (l/s) l/day l/s PF = 5 PF = 3.5Facilities 0 15 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00Retail 0 4 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00Office 0 4 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00Residential 720 600 432000 5.00 302400 3.50 25.00 12.25Parking 360TOTAL PHASE B 25.00 12.25
TOTAL 136.74 67.00
POTABLE WATER FOUL SEWER
ESTIMATED FUTURE WATER AND SEWER DEMANDS
POTABLE WATER FOUL SEWER
POTABLE WATER FOUL SEWER
PHASE A land Area (m²) Units Unit Generation rate ton/dayFacilities 1932 kg/1000m²/day 34 0.07Retail 4148 kg/1000m²/day 24 0.10Office 5840 kg/1000m²/day 24 0.14Residential 1265 kg/person/day 0.8 4.05Parking 994TOTAL PHASE A 4.35
PHASE B land Area (m²) Units Unit Generation rate ton/dayFacilities 0 kg/1000m²/day 34 0Retail 0 kg/1000m²/day 24 0Office 0 kg/1000m²/day 24 0Residential 726 kg/person/day 0.8 2.32Parking 397TOTAL PHASE B 2.32
PHASE C land Area (m²) Units Unit Generation rate ton/dayFacilities 3094 kg/1000m²/day 34 0.11Retail 5440 kg/1000m²/day 24 0.13Office 8874 kg/1000m²/day 24 0.21Residential 1382 kg/person/day 0.8 4.42Public open spaces 53875Parking 1382TOTAL PHASE C 4.87
ESTIMATED FUTURE SOLID WASTE VOLUMES
20527 - Conradie Game ChangerDevelopment Cost CalculationsSocial Housing (Grant Funded Housing)
Phase No of UnitsPer ERFContribution
Total Load(kVA)
1 708 3 2124 21242 792 3 2376 23763 304 3 912 912
Private Residential
Phase No of Units kVA/unitTotal Load(kVA)
1 480 5 2400 24002 904 5 4520 45203 416 5 2080 2080
Offices
Phase Area (sqm) VA/sqmTotal Load(kVA) DIV Factor
DIV Load(kVA)
1 5840 75 438 0.7 306.62 8874 0 0 0.7 03 0 75 0 0.7 0
Retail/Commercial
Phase Area (sqm) VA/sqmTotal Load(kVA) DIV Factor
DIV Load(kVA)
1 4148 120 497.76 0.8 398.2082 5372 120 644.64 0.8 515.7123 0 100 0 0.8 0
Facilities (School, Hall, Clinic, etc.)
Phase Area (sqm) VA/sqmTotal Load(kVA) DIV Factor
DIV Load(kVA)
Hall and School 1 3817 20 76.34 0.5 38.172 2040 0 0 0.5 0
School 3 0 40 0 0.5 0
Street Lighting
Phase Area (sqm) VA/sqmTotal Load(kVA) DIV Factor
DIV Load(kVA)
1 1600 2 3.2 1 3.22 1450 2 2.9 1 2.93 570 2 1.14 1 1.14
Totals 15677.93
1
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Appendix FEXISTING WATER NETWORK LAYOUT
Site Boundary
Checked By: S. Manie
Date: 08 October 2015
Done By: M.Adonis
Date: 08 October 2015
Requested By: WSP Group
Date: 07 October 2015
Project Title: Erf 112657
Drawing Title: Existing Water Network
Notes/Legend
Head (m)Head ( m ) <=0.0 m0.0 m < Head ( m ) <=16.0 m16.0 m < Head ( m ) <=20.0 m20.0 m < Head ( m ) <=45.0 m45.0 m < Head ( m ) <=60.0 m60.0 m < Head ( m ) <=90.0 m90.0 m < Head ( m )
Diameter 160.00 mm
Flow 1.82 l/s
Velocity 0.09 m/sDiameter 160.00 mm
Flow 2.00 l/s
Velocity 0.10 m/sDiameter 160.00 mm
Flow 2.24 l/s
Velocity 0.11 m/s
Diameter 160.00 mm
Flow 1.68 l/s
Velocity 0.08 m/s
Diameter 160.00 mm
Flow 2.24 l/s
Velocity 0.11 m/s
Diam
eter
110.0
0 mm
Flow 0.
40 l/
s
Veloc
ity 0.
04 m
/s
Diameter 110.00 mm
Flow 2.56 l/s
Velocity 0.27 m/s
Diameter 110.00 mm
Flow 1.56 l/s
Velocity 0.16 m/s
Diameter 150.00 mm
Flow 4.33 l/s
Velocity 0.25 m/s
Dia
meter 100.00 m
m
Flow 0.23 l/s
Velocity 0.03 m
/s
Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.51 l/s
Velocity 0.07 m/s
Diamete
r 100
.00 m
m
Flow 0.
14 l/
s
Velocity 0.
02 m
/sDiameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.52 l/s
Velocity 0.07 m/s
Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.34 l/s
Velocity 0.04 m/s
Diam
eter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.18 l/s
Velocity 0.02 m
/s Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.06 l/s
Velocity 0.01 m/s
Diameter 100.00 mmFlow 0.65 l/sVelocity 0.08 m/s Diameter 150.00 mm
Flow 0.70 l/s
Velocity 0.04 m/s
Diam
eter 150.00 mm
Flow 0.52 l/s
Velocity 0.03 m
/s
Dia
met
er 1
50.0
0 m
mFl
ow 1
.02
l/sV
eloc
ity 0
.06
m/s
Diam
eter 160.00 mm
Flow 6.27 l/s
Velocity 0.31 m/s
Dia
meter 150.00 m
m
Flow 0.03 l/s
Velocity 0.00 m
/s
Dia
meter 150.00 m
m
Flow 6.30 l/s
Velocity 0.36 m
/s
Diameter 150.00 mm
Flow 0.00 l/s
Velocity 0.00 m/s
Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.00 l/s
Velocity 0.00 m/s
Dia
meter 160.00 m
m
Flow 1.92 l/s
Velocity 0.10 m
/s
Diameter 380.00 m
m
Flow 40.67 l/s
Velocity 0.36 m
/s
Diam
eter
160.0
0 mm
Flow 4.
44 l/
s
Veloc
ity 0.
22 m
/s
Dia
meter 50.00 m
m
Flow 0.00 l/s
Velocity 0.00 m
/s
Diameter 150.00 mm
Flow 0.91 l/s
Velocity 0.05 m/sDiameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.91 l/s
Velocity 0.12 m/sDiameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.55 l/s
Velocity 0.07 m/s
Dia
meter 100.00 m
m
Flow 0.36 l/s
Velocity 0.05 m
/s
Diameter 160.00 mm
Flow 1.57 l/s
Velocity 0.08 m/s
Diameter 230.00 mm
Flow 24.93 l/s
Velocity 0.60 m/s
Diam
eter
380.0
0 mm
Flow 15
.67 l/
s
Veloc
ity 0.
14 m
/s
Diam
eter
160.0
0 mm
Flow 4.
40 l/
s
Veloc
ity 0.
22 m
/s
Diam
eter
160.0
0 mm
Flow 2.
36 l/
s
Veloc
ity 0.
12 m
/s Diameter 230.00 mm
Flow 23.71 l/s
Velocity 0.57 m/s
Diam
eter
110.0
0 mm
Flow 1.
03 l/
s
Veloc
ity 0.
11 m
/s
Diam
eter
160.0
0 mm
Flow 1.
59 l/
s
Veloc
ity 0.
08 m
/s
Diameter 100.00 m
m
Flow 0.12 l/s
Velocity 0.02 m/s
Dia
meter 110.00 m
m
Flow 0.41 l/s
Velocity 0.04 m
/s
Dia
meter 110.00 m
m
Flow 0.39 l/s
Velocity 0.04 m
/s
Dia
meter 110.00 m
m
Flow 0.13 l/s
Velocity 0.01 m
/s
Diam
eter
160.0
0 mm
Flow 0.
91 l/
s
Veloc
ity 0.
05 m
/sDia
met
er 11
0.00 m
m
Flow 0.
47 l/
s
Veloc
ity 0.
05 m
/s
Diam
eter
160.0
0 mm
Flow 1.
70 l/
s
Veloc
ity 0.
08 m
/s
Diam
eter
100.0
0 mm
Flow 0.
71 l/
s
Veloc
ity 0.
09 m
/s
Diameter 100.00 m
m
Flow 1.02 l/s
Velocity 0.13 m/s
Diam
eter
150.0
0 mm
Flow 2.
44 l/
s
Veloc
ity 0.
14 m
/s
Diam
eter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.11 l/s
Velocity 0.01 m
/s
Diamete
r 100
.00 m
m
Flow 0.
82 l/
s
Velocity 0.
10 m
/s
Diam
eter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.43 l/s
Velocity 0.05 m
/s
Diameter 75.00 mm
Flow 0.16 l/s
Velocity 0.04 m/s
Diam
eter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.76 l/s
Velocity 0.10 m
/s
Diam
eter 100.00 mm
Flow 1.31 l/s
Velocity 0.17 m
/s
Diameter 150.00 mm
Flow 3.20 l/s
Velocity 0.18 m/s
Diameter 150.00 mm
Flow 2.43 l/s
Velocity 0.14 m/s
Diameter 150.00 m
m
Flow 2.03 l/s
Velocity 0.12 m/s
Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.51 l/s
Velocity 0.07 m/s
Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.49 l/s
Velocity 0.06 m/s
Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.35 l/s
Velocity 0.04 m/s
Diam
eter 150.00 mm
Flow 0.29 l/s
Velocity 0.02 m
/s
Diameter 380.00 mm
Flow 61.41 l/s
Velocity 0.54 m/s
Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 7.36 l/s
Velocity 0.94 m/s
Diam
eter 160.00 mm
Flow 7.36 l/s
Velocity 0.37 m/s
Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.60 l/s
Velocity 0.08 m/s
Diam
eter 100.00 mm
Flow 1.87 l/s
Velocity 0.24 m/s
Diameter 380.00 mm
Flow 51.14 l/s
Velocity 0.45 m/s
Diameter 380.00 mm
Flow 49.27 l/s
Velocity 0.43 m/s
Diam
eter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.00 l/s
Velocity 0.00 m/s
Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.60 l/s
Velocity 0.08 m/s
Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.00 l/s
Velocity 0.00 m/sDiameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.47 l/s
Velocity 0.06 m/s
Diam
eter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.14 l/s
Velocity 0.02 m
/s
Dia
meter 50.00 m
m
Flow 3.29 l/s
Velocity 1.67 m
/s
Dia
met
er 1
60.0
0 m
m
Flow
0.4
0 l/s
Velo
city
0.0
2 m
/s
Diameter 150.00 mmFlow 4.09 l/sVelocity 0.23 m/s
Dia
meter 50.00 m
mFlow
0.10 l/sV
elocity 0.05 m/s
Diameter 150.00 mm
Flow 0.91 l/s
Velocity 0.05 m/s
Diam
eter
150.0
0 mm
Flow 4.
51 l/
s
Veloc
ity 0.
26 m
/s
Diameter 150.00 mm
Flow 8.60 l/s
Velocity 0.49 m/s
Diameter 100.00 mmFlow 0.13 l/sVelocity 0.02 m/s
Diam
eter 160.00 mm
Flow 0.00 l/s
Velocity 0.00 m
/s
Diameter 230.00 m
m
Flow 21.84 l/s
Velocity 0.53 m/s
Diam
eter
110.0
0 mm
Flow 1.
39 l/
s
Veloc
ity 0.
15 m
/s
Diameter 160.00 mm
Flow 0.01 l/s
Velocity 0.00 m/sD
iameter 160.00 m
m
Flow 1.90 l/s
Velocity 0.09 m
/s
Diam
eter 160.00 mm
Flow 0.92 l/s
Velocity 0.05 m
/s
Dia
meter 150.00 m
mFlow
1.58 l/sV
elocity 0.09 m/s
Dia
met
er 1
10.0
0 m
m
Flow
1.1
9 l/s
Vel
ocity
0.1
3 m
/sDia
met
er 10
0.00 m
m
Flow 0.
79 l/
s
Veloc
ity 0.
10 m
/s
Diam
eter
110.0
0 mm
Flow 0.
53 l/
s
Veloc
ity 0.
06 m
/s
Dia
meter 230.00 m
m
Flow 22.93 l/s
Velocity 0.55 m
/s
Dia
met
er 1
50.0
0 m
mFl
ow 1
.98
l/sV
eloc
ity 0
.11
m/s
Diameter 100.00 m
m
Flow 1.17 l/s
Velocity 0.15 m/s
Dia
meter 160.00 m
m
Flow 1.96 l/s
Velocity 0.10 m
/s
Diameter 160.00 mm
Flow 5.34 l/s
Velocity 0.27 m/s
Diameter 160.00 mm
Flow 2.13 l/s
Velocity 0.11 m/s
Diameter 100.00 m
m
Flow 0.45 l/s
Velocity 0.06 m/s
Diam
eter
110.0
0 mm
Flow 1.
51 l/
s
Veloc
ity 0.
16 m
/s
Diameter 150.00 mm
Flow 0.18 l/s
Velocity 0.01 m/s
Diameter 100.00 m
m
Flow 0.00 l/s
Velocity 0.00 m/s
Diameter 150.00 mm
Flow 0.18 l/s
Velocity 0.01 m/s
Diamete
r 150
.00 m
m
Flow 3.
20 l/
s
Velocity 0.
18 m
/s
Diamete
r 150
.00 m
m
Flow 2.
99 l/
s
Velocity 0.
17 m
/s
Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.15 l/s
Velocity 0.02 m/s
Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.10 l/s
Velocity 0.01 m/s
Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.95 l/s
Velocity 0.12 m/s
Diamete
r 100
.00 m
m
Flow 0.
85 l/
s
Velocity 0.
11 m
/s
Diamete
r 150
.00 m
m
Flow 1.
92 l/
s
Velocity 0.
11 m
/s
Diamete
r 150
.00 m
m
Flow 1.
77 l/
s
Velocity 0.
10 m
/s
Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.12 l/s
Velocity 0.01 m/s
Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.49 l/s
Velocity 0.06 m/s
Diamete
r 150
.00 m
m
Flow 1.
43 l/
s
Velocity 0.
08 m
/s
Diameter 100.00 m
m
Flow 0.12 l/s
Velocity 0.01 m/s
Diamete
r 100
.00 m
m
Flow 0.
60 l/
s
Velocity 0.
08 m
/s
Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.26 l/s
Velocity 0.03 m/s
Diam
eter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.70 l/s
Velocity 0.09 m/s
Diam
eter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.12 l/s
Velocity 0.02 m/s
Diameter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.36 l/s
Velocity 0.05 m/s
Diam
eter 100.00 mm
Flow 0.31 l/s
Velocity 0.04 m/s
Dia
met
er 1
00.0
0 m
mFl
ow 0
.31
l/sV
eloc
ity 0
.04
m/s
Diameter 100.00 mmFlow 0.00 l/sVelocity 0.00 m/s
Dia
met
er 1
00.0
0 m
mFl
ow 0
.11
l/sV
eloc
ity 0
.01
m/s
Dia
met
er 1
00.0
0 m
mFl
ow 0
.36
l/sV
eloc
ity 0
.05
m/s
Diameter 150.00 mm
Flow 1.95 l/s
Velocity 0.11 m/s
Scale 1:4318.408
0 75 150 225 300 meters
ALLE INLIGTING SOOS GETOON, MOET OP TERREIN GEVERIFEER WORD VOORDAT ENIGE BEPLANNING
OF KONSTRUKSIE KAN PLASSVIND
ALL INFORMATION SHOWN MUST BE VERIFIED ON SITE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY PLANNING
OR CONSTRUCTION
ZONKE INKCUKACHA EZIBONISWE APHA KUFUNEKA ZIYOKUQINISEKISWA KUMHLABA LOWO
UBANDAKANYEKAYO PHAMBI KOKUQULUNQA OKANYE KUQALWE UMSEBENZI
Figure : 1
1
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Appendix GEXISTING SEWER NETWORK LAYOUT
Site Boundary
Notes/Legend
Project Title: Erf 112657
Drawing Title: Existing Sewer Network
Done By: M. Adonis
Date: 08 October 2015
Checked By: S. Manie
Date: 08 October 2015
Requested By: WSP Group
Date: 07 October 2015
ATH_12722
ATH_12730
ATH_12723ATH_12725
ATH_12777
ATH_12776
ATH_12775
ATH_12774
ATH_12651
ATH_12729
ATH_11914
ATH_11913
ATH_11885
ATH_11891
ATH_11879
ATH_11878
ATH_11877
ATH_11881
ATH_11880
ATH_11882
ATH_11901
ATH_11900
ATH_11924
ATH_11923
ATH_11929
ATH_11928
ATH_11927
ATH_11932
ATH_12721
ATH_12720
ATH_11926
ATH_11925
ATH_11940
ATH_11935
ATH_11934
ATH_11938
ATH_11939
ATH_12724
ATH_11936
ATH_11888
ATH_11887
ATH_11886
ATH_11876
ATH_11875
ATH_11874
ATH_06090
ATH_06179
ATH_06178
ATH_06177
ATH_06185
ATH_06159
ATH_06184
ATH_06114
ATH_06115
ATH_06124
ATH_06181
ATH_00215
ATH_00213
ATH_06182
ATH_06143
ATH_06144
ATH_06145
ATH_06146
ATH_06147
ATH_00214
ATH_06183
ATH_06160
ATH_06161
ATH_06162
ATH_06163
ATH_06164
ATH_06176
ATH_06180
ATH_06175
ATH_06174
ATH_06173
ATH_06166
ATH_06165
ATH_06172
ATH_06171
ATH_06170
ATH_06169
ATH_06168
ATH_06167
ATH_00216
ATH_12665
ATH_12664
ATH_11897ATH_11903
ATH_11902
ATH_11896
ATH_11915
ATH_11921
ATH_11920
ATH_11919
ATH_11918
ATH_11917
ATH_11922
ATH_11906
ATH_12667
ATH_12666
ATH_12672
ATH_12671
ATH_12670
ATH_12669
ATH_12668
ATH_12679
ATH_12678
ATH_12677
ATH_12676
ATH_12675
ATH_12680
ATH_12682
ATH_12681
ATH_11893
ATH_11892
ATH_12648
ATH_12647
ATH_12773
ATH_12790
ATH_12684
ATH_12683
ATH_11895
ATH_11894
ATH_11908
ATH_11907
ATH_12688
ATH_11899
ATH_11898
ATH_11916
ATH_11905
ATH_11904
ATH_11909
ATH_11910
ATH_11912
ATH_11911
ATH_11931
ATH_11930
ATH_11933
ATH_12650
ATH_12649
ATH_12687
ATH_12690
ATH_12689
ATH_06112ATH_06111
ATH_06110
ATH_06113
ATH_06103
ATH_06066
ATH_06065
ATH_06108
ATH_06122
ATH_06076
ATH_06075
ATH_06106
ATH_06105
ATH_06064
ATH_06063
ATH_06062
ATH_06077
ATH_06091
ATH_06116
ATH_06117
ATH_06118
ATH_06119
ATH_06120
ATH_06129
ATH_06130
ATH_06127
ATH_06128
ATH_06125
ATH_06126
ATH_06158
ATH_00206
ATH_06121
ATH_06131
ATH_06132
ATH_06133
ATH_06134
ATH_06136
ATH_06137
ATH_06138
ATH_06139
ATH_06142
ATH_06140
ATH_06141
ATH_00209
ATH_00208
ATH_00207
ATH_06150
ATH_06155
ATH_06153
ATH_06154
ATH_06152
ATH_00211
ATH_00210
ATH_06157
ATH_06156
ATH_00212
ATH_06148
ATH_06149
ATH_06151
ATH_06135
ATH_00202
ATH_06058
ATH_06057
ATH_06061
ATH_00203
ATH_06054
ATH_06053
ATH_06052
ATH_06051
ATH_06050
ATH_06045
ATH_06060
ATH_06059
ATH_06109
ATH_00205
ATH_00204
ATH_06049
ATH_06048
ATH_06047
ATH_06046
ATH_06123
ATH_06055
ATH_12663
ATH_12662
ATH_12661
ATH_12660
ATH_12659
ATH_12658
ATH_12673
ATH_12674
ATH_06086
ATH_06085
ATH_06087
ATH_06088
ATH_06992
ATH_06041
ATH_06099
ATH_06098
ATH_06097
ATH_06104
ATH_06074
ATH_06073
ATH_06072
ATH_06084
ATH_06083
ATH_06102
ATH_06101
ATH_06100
ATH_06107
ATH_06082
ATH_06081
ATH_06095
ATH_06094
ATH_06093
ATH_06092
ATH_06031
ATH_06044
ATH_06043
ATH_06056
ATH_06030
MD 15
0.00
DF 11.4
9
IPDW
F 0.01
MD
150.00D
F 11.49IPD
WF 0.01
MD 15
0.00
DF 10.4
5
IPDW
F 0.16
MD 150.00DF 22.45
IPDWF 0.03
MD 15
0.00
DF 23.7
2
IPDW
F 0.05
MD 150.00
DF 15.46
IPDWF 1.43
MD 150.0
0
DF 14.0
8
IPDWF 1.42
MD 150.00
DF 9.32
IPDWF 1.42
MD 150.00
DF 14.58
IPDWF 0.14
MD 150.00
DF 15.17
IPDWF 0.42
MD 15
0.00
DF 22.9
0
IPDW
F 0.08M
D 150.00
DF 16.32
IPDWF 0.27
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 0.00
MD 150.00DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.13
MD 15
0.00
DF 11.4
9
IPDW
F 0.04
MD
150
.00
DF
29.2
2IP
DW
F 0.
04
MD 150.00
DF 11.14
IPDWF 0.16
MD
150
.00
DF
11.4
9IP
DW
F 0.
00
MD 150.00DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.00
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.01 MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.02
MD 15
0.00
DF 11.4
9IPD
WF 0
.05
MD 150.00
DF 14.98
IPDWF 0.08
MD 15
0.00
DF 15.8
1
IPDW
F 0.11
MD 150.00DF 21.92
IPDWF 0.45
MD
150.00D
F 15.95IPD
WF 0.22
MD 150.00DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.09MD 150.00DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.00
MD 150.00DF 24.43
IPDWF 0.08MD 150.00
DF 11.49IPDWF 0.00
MD
150.00D
F 11.49IPD
WF 0.11
MD 150.00DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.00
MD
150.00D
F 11.49IPD
WF 0.03
MD
225
.00
DF
37.5
0IP
DW
F 0.
94
MD 150.00DF 16.64
IPDWF 0.19
MD
225
.00
DF
39.0
9IP
DW
F 0.
84
MD
150
.00
DF
11.4
9IP
DW
F 0.
02
MD
225
.00
DF
37.4
5IP
DW
F 1.
03
MD
150
.00
DF
48.4
4IP
DW
F 0.
02MD
150
.00
DF
11.4
9IP
DW
F 0.
01
MD 150.00DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.01
MD
750.00D
F 379.26IPD
WF 459.01
MD 150.00
DF 19.12
IPDWF 0.80
MD
750.00D
F 402.86IPD
WF 459.08
MD 150.00
DF 13.00
IPDWF 0.23
MD 150.00
DF 12.96
IPDWF 0.24
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.23
MD
149.00
DF 11.33
IPDW
F 0.23
MD 150.00
DF 15.40
IPDWF 0.62
MD
150.00
DF 6.89
IPDW
F 0.62 MD 150.00
DF 17.07
IPDWF 0.61
MD 150.00
DF 7.62
IPDWF 0.61
MD 150.00
DF 6.49
IPDWF 0.61
MD 150.00
DF 12.99
IPDWF 0.61
MD 150.00DF 13.06
IPDWF 0.61
MD 150.00
DF 12.97
IPDWF 0.61
MD
150.00
DF 12.84
IPDW
F 0.77
MD
750.00D
F 532.51IPD
WF 459.98
MD 150.00
DF 12.82
IPDWF 0.63
MD 150.00
DF 11.30
IPDWF 0.62
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.14
MD
150.00
DF 17.03
IPDW
F 0.00
MD 150.00
DF 13.25
IPDWF 0.23
MD 150.00
DF 13.03
IPDWF 0.19
MD 150.00
DF 12.01
IPDWF 0.18
MD
150.00
DF 9.84
IPDW
F 0.16M
D 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDW
F 0.10
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.10
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.11
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.01
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.17
MD 150.00
DF 38.54
IPDWF 0.04
MD 150.00DF 15.09
IPDWF 0.03
MD
150.00
DF 29.30
IPDW
F 0.06
MD 15
0.00
DF 9.08
IPDW
F 3.86
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 0.00
MD 30
0.00
DF 52.5
0
IPDW
F 3.97
MD
150.00
DF 14.46
IPDW
F 0.09
MD 150.00DF 28.36
IPDWF 0.16
MD 15
0.00
DF 14.6
0IPD
WF 0
.10
MD 15
0.00
DF 13.4
9
IPDW
F 0.05
MD 150.00DF 14.42
MD 15
0.00
DF 16.3
7
IPDW
F 0.10
MD 15
0.00
DF 11.4
9
IPDW
F 0.02
MD 15
0.00
DF 16.0
0
IPDW
F 0.19
IPDWF 0.16
MD 15
0.00
DF 11.4
9
IPDW
F 0.05
MD 30
0.00
DF 57.4
7
IPDW
F 4.15MD 150.00
DF 23.42
IPDWF 0.15
MD 150.00DF 26.05
IPDWF 0.28
MD 150.00DF 27.59
IPDWF 0.26
MD 30
0.00
DF 27.2
5
IPDW
F 4.90
MD 30
0.00
DF 136
.34
IPDW
F 4.34
MD 150.00
DF 16.65
IPDWF 0.15
MD 150.00
DF 27.68
IPDWF 0.05
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.03
MD 150.00
DF 12.29
IPDWF 0.08
MD 150.00
DF 21.68
IPDWF 0.06
MD
150.00
DF 21.71
IPDW
F 0.05
MD 150.00
DF 21.65
IPDWF 0.05
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.05
MD
150
.00
DF
11.4
9IP
DW
F 0.
00
MD
225.00D
F 45.34IPD
WF 0.20
MD 225.00
DF 48.88
IPDWF 0.18
MD 150.00
DF 39.47
IPDWF 0.02
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.00
MD 225.00
DF 48.90
IPDWF 0.10
MD 225.00
DF 48.91
IPDWF 0.06
MD 1
50.0
0DF 1
1.49
IPDW
F 0.0
2
MD
225.00D
F 45.35IPD
WF 0.25
MD
150.
00DF
39.
18IP
DWF
0.04
MD
225.00D
F 39.09IPD
WF 0.30
MD 150.00DF 15.80IPDWF 0.32
MD 150.00DF 15.62
IPDWF 0.29
MD 150.00
DF 14.65
IPDWF 3.03
MD 150.00
DF 9.82
IPDWF 3.56
MD 150.00
DF 22.12
IPDWF 0.00
MD 150.00
DF 25.91
IPDWF 0.00
MD 150.00
DF 9.31
IPDWF 3.62
MD 150.00
DF 22.50
IPDWF 0.02
MD 150.00
DF 18.30
IPDWF 0.02
MD
150
.00
DF
70.7
5IP
DW
F 0.
01
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.00
MD 15
0.00
DF 7.47
IPDW
F 3.81
MD 150.00
DF 8.05
IPDWF 3.69
MD 150.00
DF 8.11
IPDWF 3.66
MD 150.00
DF 9.16
IPDWF 3.66
MD 150.00
DF 12.68
IPDWF 3.62
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.04
MD
150.00D
F 11.49IPD
WF 0.00
MD 15
0.00
DF 9.44
IPDW
F 3.82
MD 150.00
DF 20.86
IPDWF 1.34
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 1.34
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 0.11
MD 7
50.0
0DF 4
53.2
1
IPDW
F 458
.80
MD 149.00DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.01
MD 7
50.0
0DF 4
71.0
3
IPDW
F 458
.88
MD
300
.00
DF
113.
14IP
DW
F 0.
09
MD 3
00.0
0DF 9
4.24
IPDW
F 0.0
2
MD 75
0.00
DF 531
.62
IPDW
F 458
.98
MD
149.00
DF 11.33
IPDW
F 0.14
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.32
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.09
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.17
MD
149.00
DF 11.33
IPDW
F 0.08
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.07
MD
149.00
DF 11.33
IPDW
F 0.07
MD 7
50.0
0DF 7
01.7
5
IPDW
F 458
.00
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.75
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.00
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.10MD 149.00DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.10
MD
149.00
DF 11.33
IPDW
F 0.75
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.06
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.00
MD
149.00
DF 11.33
IPDW
F 0.09
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.20
MD 149.00DF 11.33IPDWF 0.25
MD
149.00
DF 11.33
IPDW
F 0.35
MD
149.00
DF 11.33
IPDW
F 0.54
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.12
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.08
MD 7
50.0
0DF 4
66.9
8
IPDW
F 457
.81
MD 7
50.0
0DF 4
78.8
6
IPDW
F 457
.90
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 0.09
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.03MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.00
IPDW
F 0.07
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.02
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 0.05
MD
149.00
DF 11.33
IPDW
F 0.62
MD
149.00
DF 11.33
IPDW
F 0.65
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.03
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.03
MD
149.00
DF 11.33
IPDW
F 0.57
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.03MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.00
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.13
MD
149.00
DF 11.33
IPDW
F 0.55
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.39
MD
149.00
DF 11.33
IPDW
F 1.53
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.02
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.02
MD 15
0.00
DF 11.4
9
IPDW
F 0.04
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 2.82
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.11
MD 150.00DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.11
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.08
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 0.06
MD
750.
00DF
615
.60
IPDW
F 457
.72
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 2.71
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 1.53
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 2.67
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 1.95
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 0.12
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 2.16
MD
149.00
DF 11.33
IPDW
F 1.44MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.03
MD
149.00D
F 11.33IPD
WF 1.47
MD 149.00DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.05
MD 149.00DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.00 MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 0.03
MD
150.
00DF
18.
40IP
DWF 3
.00
MD 150.00
DF 10.04
IPDWF 2.98
MD 150.00
DF 9.74
IPDWF 2.98
MD 150.00
DF 8.64
IPDWF 2.97
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 0.02 MD 1
50.0
0DF 1
1.49
IPDW
F 0.0
2
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.00
MD 750.00
DF 523.70
IPDWF 451.62
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.08
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.12
MD
150.00D
F 11.49IPD
WF 0.02
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.04
MD
750.
00DF
824
.63
IPDW
F 457
.54
MD 750.00
DF 528.37
IPDWF 451.75
MD 150.00
DF 13.99
IPDWF 6.02
MD
150.00D
F 14.68IPD
WF 6.01
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 1.40
MD 15
0.00
DF 11.4
9
IPDW
F 0.13
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.12MD 150.00
DF 74.29
IPDWF 6.06
MD 150.00
MD
750
.00
DF
460.
48IP
DW
F 45
7.63
MD
150.00
DF 11.85
IPDW
F 6.00
MD
150.
00DF
7.6
2IP
DWF 5
.96
MD 225.00
DF 25.84
IPDWF 5.96
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 1.59
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.22
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.19
MD 149.00
DF 11.33
IPDWF 1.55
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 0.03
MD 150.00
DF 12.06
IPDWF 0.01
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.03
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 1.51
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 1.49
MD 150.00DF 11.49
IPDWF 1.47
MD 150.00
DF 11.06
IPDWF 0.60
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.26
MD 150.00DF 4.80
IPDWF 0.85
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 0.79
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.11
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.04
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 0.65
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 0.56
MD 150.00
DF 12.22
IPDWF 0.05
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.08
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.07
MD 15
0.00
DF 11.4
9
IPDW
F 0.06
MD
150
.00
DF
11.4
9IP
DW
F 0.
04
MD
150
.00
DF
11.4
9IP
DW
F 0.
02
MD 15
0.00
DF 31.0
6
IPDW
F 0.03
MD
150.00
DF 18.23
IPDW
F 0.08
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 0.10
MD
150.00
DF 11.49
IPDW
F 1.81
MD
150.00
DF 12.37
IPDW
F 0.25
MD 150.00
DF 15.60
IPDWF 0.21
MD
150.00
DF 14.73
IPDW
F 0.13
MD 750.00
DF 452.98
IPDWF 451.50
MD 15
0.00
DF 11.4
9
IPDW
F 0.06
MD 150.00
DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.01
MD 150.00DF 11.49
IPDWF 0.02
Scale 1:3911.088
0 50 100 150 200 meters
ALLE INLIGTING SOOS GETOON, MOET OP TERREIN GEVERIFEER WORD VOORDAT ENIGE BEPLANNING
OF KONSTRUKSIE KAN PLASSVIND
ALL INFORMATION SHOWN MUST BE VERIFIED ON SITE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY PLANNING
OR CONSTRUCTION
MD = Modelled Diameter (mm)
DF = Design Flow ( l/s)
IPDWF = Instantaneous peak Dry Weather Flow ( l/s)
Gravity Pipes
Relative Spare Capacity < 0.0%Relative Spare Capacity < 30.0%Relative Spare Capacity < 60.0%Relative Spare Capacity < 90.0%Relative Spare Capacity > 90.0%Rising MainManhole
Pump Structure
MD = Modelled Diameter (mm)
DF = Design Flow ( l/s)
IPDWF = Instantaneous peak Dry Weather Flow ( l/s)
Relative Spare Capacity < 0.0%Relative Spare Capacity < 30.0%Relative Spare Capacity < 60.0%Relative Spare Capacity < 90.0%Relative Spare Capacity > 90.0%Rising Manhole
Pump Structure
ZONKE INKCUKACHA EZIBONISWE APHA KUFUNEKA ZIYOKUQINISEKISWA KUMHLABA LOWO
UBANDAKANYEKAYO PHAMBI KOKUQULUNQA OKANYE KUQALWE UMSEBENZI
Figure : 2
1
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Appendix HSERVICES COST ESTIMATE
8 July 2016Rev.10.C
EXTERNAL ROADS & BULK SERVICES
350 000R
8 500 000R
70 000 000R
15 000 000R
2 250 000R
12 750 000R
500 000R
16 600 000R
39 000 000R
30 500 000R
4 000 000R
34 000 000R
44 200 000R
12 000 000R3 500 000R
293 150 000RSummary of Design & Construction Costs 28 200 000R
264 950 000R
ESTIMATED COST (D&C ex Vat) TOTALS
ROADS & CIVIL SERVICES
Site Clearance & Earthworks 11 028 942R
Roads 58 497 339R
Services 49 302 565R
LANDSCAPING 13 800 000R
FENCING 1 200 000RELECTRICAL 35 000 000R
168 828 846R28 973 617R29 173 544R14 886 772R
21/2220/21
1 000 000R -R
Design Odin Road and Aerodrome Road Extensions 3 300 000R 3 300 000R 3 800 000R
-R
Sewer - Construction
-R
-R
-R -R -R
15 000 000R 15 000 000R
2 500 000R 8 300 000R 6 550 000R
-R
4 300 000R 3 800 000R
1 000 000R
30 000 000R 9 000 000R
-R
-R
-R -R -R 20 000 000R
-R
600 000R
-R
-R 4 000 000R -R -R -R
52 050 000R 41 300 000R 48 800 000R 30 100 000R
1 900 000R
45 500 000R 37 000 000R 45 000 000R 28 200 000R
1 920 000R
5 320 000R
CONRADIE "BETTER LIVING MODEL" EXEMPLAR PROJECTCalculations for Funding required for % Grant-funded Housing [Basis: Total Du's = 3603 (Scheme 3C) 49% subsidized]
-R -R 1 500 000R 750 000R -R -R
16/17 19/20
Studies required for external Roads and Stormwater 350 000R -R -R -R
BULK/ EXTERNAL SERVICES COST
-R 1 500 000R 3 500 000R 2 500 000R 1 000 000R
HOUSING AND INTERNAL SERVICES PER FINANCIAL YEAR
Construct- Aerodrome Bridge Electrical cable relocation allowance 12 000 000R
4 500 000R
8 700 000R
31 681 258R
-R 40 000 000R
1 500 000R
-R
1 000 000R
-R
4 800 000R
13 300 000R
4 485 232R
23 089 783R 9 991 241R 25 416 315R
1 900 000R
Flood Relief / Storm Water - Design
-R -R 6 250 000R 6 500 000R -R -R -R
-R
-R
-R -R 10 000 000R 2 500 000REarthworks for flood relief - Construction
-R -R
TOTALS21/22
-R
18/19
2 250 000R
6 500 000R
32 256 864R
20/2117/1815/16
22 292 002R41 246 047R
Sewer - Design
BULK / EXTERNAL ROADS COST
Construction: Forrest Drive Extension upgrades (turning lanes, etc)
INTERNAL SERVICES
4 500 000R
Construction Costs
2 660 000R
960 000R
13 000 000R
72 633 860R 64 513 728R
-R
500 000R
3 300 000R
Construct Odin Bridge
4 780 550R 1 763 160R
Phase 1
Design Costs
2 500 000R 117 550 000R
15/16 16/17
Construct- FencingTotal Estimated Design and Construction Costs
850 000R
850 000R
-R
-R-R1 200 000R 600 000R
3 720 000R 2 700 000R 2 250 000R
8 800 000R 5 650 000R 6 070 000R
18/19 19/20
-R
-R
17/18
-R
-R
Flood Relief / Storm Water - Construction
2 500 000R -R
-R -R -RAerodrome Route location Study
-R-R-R-R-R
Construct Odin Road -R 18 000 000R 12 500 000R -R -R
Construct- Aerodrome Road Extension -R -R
-R
Phase 2 Phase 3
-R 109 250 000R
-R
-R 956 110R 1 912 220R 2 617 484R
25 463 527R 6 726 857R 17 112 181R 5 074 647R 7 517 558R 8 556 091R-R 5 092 705R 10 185 411R 12 876 154R
14 000 000R
Construct- Aerodrome Bridge -R -R -R -R 6 000 000R 24 000 000R 14 200 000R
-R -R -R
1 330 103R 1 970 409R 2 242 616R
4 617 957R 9 235 913R 13 232 410R 7 537 252R 11 165 650R 12 708 157R
-R
1
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Appendix ICORRESPONDENCE WITH COCT
www.capetown.gov.za
Making progress possible. Together.
Durbanville Municipal Office Durbanville Municipal Office Durbanville Munisipale KantoorCnr Queen & Oxford Street Cnr Queen & Oxford Street H/V Queen & Oxford StraatDurbanville 7500 Durbanville 7500 Durbanville 7500
Tel: +27 21 444 0739 Umnxeba: +27 21 444 0739 Tel: +27 21 444 0739Fax: +27 21 970 3140 Ifeksi: +27 21 970 3140 Faks: +27 21 970 3140
E-mail: [email protected]
Evaluator: M. Adonis
Ref No : 20151006_Z
14th October 2015
Johan Snyman
WSP Group
Email: [email protected]
COMMENT ON WATER AND SANITATION CAPACITY FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF ERF112657_THORNTON
BackgroundWSP Group have been appointed to obtain confirmation of the available capacity within theexisting network surrounding the proposed site. The intended land use is for 3000 residentialdwelling units.
This letter provides an analysis of the existing water and sewer infrastructure in the vicinity of thedevelopment.
Table 1.1: Water demands and sewer flows as supplied by WSP Group
Potable Water Demand Sewer Flow*
ERF
Number/Portion
Number
ApplicationTotal AADD
(kl/d)
Peak Flow
(l/s)
(PF= 4.0)
Fire Flow
(l/s)
Total ADWF
(kl/d)
Peak Flow
(Dry
weather)
(l/s)
(PF=2.5)
Erf 112657Residential
(3000 units)1725.0 kl/d 79.86 l/s - 1207.50 kl/d* 34.94 l/s
*Based on a 70% sewer flow design criterion
Water ReticulationThe site is situated within the Pinelands PRV water zone.It appears as though the surrounding network has sufficient capacity to supply the proposeddevelopment with 79.86l/s.
www.capetown.gov.za
Making progress possible. Together.
2
See figure 1 for existing water network layout.
Bulk WaterNo bulk water pipelines or infrastructure under the control of the City of Cape Town’s Bulk WaterBranch exist in by the proposed development shown in the application.
Input regarding the capacity to supply this development has not been received from our BulkWater branch, therefore this comment may be revised upon receiving their input.
Sewer ReticulationThe proposed development drains to the Northern Area sewer which has no spare capacity andexperiences collapses in certain places. The new Northern Area Sewer is at the completion stageof construction and will be commissioned shortly. After commissioning this bulk sewer will havesufficient capacity to accommodate this development.
See figure 2 for existing sewer network.
WastewaterThe anticipated wastewater flow from the proposed development has been calculated to be1207.50kl/d.
This proposed development is situated within the catchment of the Athlone WastewaterTreatment Works (WWTW). The treatment plant has insufficient unallocated capacity to handlethe anticipated wastewater from this development. The Cape Flats 3 bulk sewer is beingconstructed which will allow diversion from Athlone WWTW to the Cape Flats WWTW which isexpected to be completed by June 2018.
The developer is required to provide a construction programme that is negotiated with theManger of the Waste Water branch, Mr. Kevin Samson. This negotiated programme will be used tofacilitate operational adjustments at Athlone if required.
ConclusionThere is sufficient capacity within the existing water network to accommodate the proposeddevelopment. This development can only proceed once the Northern Areas Sewer iscommissioned. The timing and budgeting for the implementation of upgrades to the sewerreticulation network as well as the WWTW will have to be confirmed with the District Head.
Conditions· Municipal Water and Sanitation services are to be designed according to Departmental
Service Standards and approved prior to construction.· Handover of Municipal Water and Sanitation services will be subject to quality control
during construction.· Please note that this letter is not agreement to provide a new water or sewer connection to
the development. A formal application must be made in this regard to the ReticulationDistrict Head.
www.capetown.gov.za
Making progress possible. Together.
3
· Development Contributions may be payable, not checked at this stage, butcan be resolved with the Reticulation District Head.
General/ DisclaimerInformation provided is based on best available data.
The flows and pressures provided in this comment are theoretical and not measured. Theinfrastructure as-built information referred to and used in the hydraulic models are based on theGIS asset records, while modelled pressures, flows, velocities, capacities and volumes are basedon hydraulic models of current land use and demands. Where appropriate, future land use anddemands are considered and the impact of a development compared to that currently plannedfor the same land and surroundings.
This comment on confirmation of the ability to service the development does not confer anyrights of development, which will be determined by the approved land use application processbeing followed.
Yours Faithfully
X
On behalf ofPeter FlowerDIRECTOR: WATER & SANITATION DEPARTMENT---------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 10
Department: Water & Sanitation – 21 December 2015 (Shamile Manie)
BackgroundWSP Group has been appointed to obtain confirmation of the available capacity withinthe existing network surrounding the proposed site. The intended land use is for 3600residential dwelling units as well as approximately 28 450m2 commercial space. Theproposed development has been catered for within our current master plan however interms of proposed water demand, it has to be noted that a predicted densification andAADD of 610 dwelling units and 591.67kl/d respectively was used, which is much lowerthan that which is being proposed at present.
This letter provides an analysis of the existing water and sewer infrastructure near thedevelopment.
Table 1.1: Estimated water and sewer demands based on gross floor area obtained usingapplicable floor space ratio from the town-planning scheme. (Departmental Standardsand Redbook Chapter 9)
Potable Water Demand Sewer Flow*
ERFNumber/Portion
NumberApplication
TotalAADD(kl/d)
Peak Flow(l/s)
(PF= 5.0)
Fire Flow(l/s)
Total ADWF
(kl/d)
Peak Flow(Dry
weather)(l/s)
(PF=3.5)
Erf 112657
Residential
(3600 units)
2160.0kl/d
131.60 l/s
25.0 l/s 1512.0 kl/d
66.0 l/sMixed Use
( ±28450m2)
113.80kl/d
25.0 l/s 108.11 kl/d
*Based on a 70 and 95% sewer flow design criterion
Conradie BLMEPProject Management Office
Project Manager: Mark Munro11 January 2016
Collective comments from the City of Cape Town: 1st Draft DevelopmentFramework
Page 2 of 10
Water Reticulation
The site is situated within the Pinelands PRV water zone.
It appears as though the surrounding network has sufficient capacity to supply theproposed development with 131.60l/s. Due to the increase in demand as compared tothe previous application submitted the velocity in the 380mmØ distribution main increasesto approximately 1.5m/s. This peak velocity is a bit high but the network canaccommodate the development. There may be a need to augment the supply or boostthe supply to satisfy the requirements under fire conditions.
See figure 1 for existing water network layout.
Bulk Water
No bulk water pipelines or infrastructure under the control of the City of Cape Town’s BulkWater Branch exist in by the proposed development shown in the application.
The City of Cape Town’s bulk supply system has sufficient water resources, treatment, bulkstorage and conveyance capacity to supply the estimated annual average dailydemand of 2273.80kl/day of the proposed development.
Sewer Reticulation
The proposed development drains to the Northern Area sewer which has no sparecapacity and experiences collapses in certain places. The new Northern Area Sewer is atthe completion stage of construction and will be commissioned shortly. Aftercommissioning this bulk sewer will have sufficient capacity to accommodate thisdevelopment.
See figure 2 for existing sewer network.
Wastewater
The anticipated wastewater flow from the proposed development has been calculatedto be 1620.11kl/d.
This proposed development is situated within the catchment of the Athlone WastewaterTreatment Works (WWTW). The treatment plant has insufficient unallocated capacity tohandle the anticipated wastewater from this development. The Cape Flats 3 bulk sewer isbeing constructed which will allow diversion from Athlone WWTW to the Cape Flats WWTWwhich is expected to be completed by June 2018.
The developer is required to provide a construction programme that is negotiated withthe Manger of the Waste Water branch, Mr. Kevin Samson. This negotiated programmewill be used to facilitate operational adjustments at Athlone if required.
Page 3 of 10
Conclusion
There is sufficient capacity within the existing water network to accommodate theproposed development. This development can only proceed once the new NorthernAreas Sewer is fully commissioned.
Conditions
· Municipal Water and Sanitation services are to be designed according toDepartmental Service Standards and approved prior to construction.
· Handover of Municipal Water and Sanitation services will be subject to quality controlduring construction.
· Please note that this letter is not agreement to provide a new water or sewerconnection to the development. A formal application must be made in this regard tothe Reticulation District Head.
· Development Contributions may be payable, not checked at this stage, but can beresolved with the Reticulation District Head.
General/ Disclaimer
Information provided is based on best available data.
The flows and pressures provided in this comment are theoretical and not measured. Theinfrastructure as-built information referred to and used in the hydraulic models are basedon the GIS asset records, while modelled pressures, flows, velocities, capacities andvolumes are based on hydraulic models of current land use and demands. Whereappropriate, future land use and demands are considered and the impact of adevelopment compared to that currently planned for the same land and surroundings.
This comment on confirmation of the ability to service the development does not conferany rights of development, which will be determined by the approved land useapplication process being followed.
Department: Storm water – 23 December 2015 (Ben de Wet)
Herewith Storm water & Sustainability’s comment on the Conradie Concept DevelopmentFramework Report. (Draft 2, 11 Dec 2015)
1. My main criticism is that the development options (3a to 3c) do not specificallymention the alignment of the Elsieskraal canal.
2. It would appear from the (unclear, unlabelled) sketches that all 3 options call forthe diversion of the canal, but I can’t be sure.
3. Only in section 6.4.5.1 are canal realignment options discussed. Then it is stated that“Option 3C is considered the preferred option”
4. Is this a reference to Development Option Variation 3C (section 6.4), in which case Iam no clearer as to the canal alignment, or is it a typo and intended to refer tostorm water option 3? (section 6.4.5.1)
Page 4 of 10
5. Below are my specific comments numbered according to the report numbering;6. 2.3.2.6 We will require Storm water management and maintenance plans (2
reports)7. 2.4.1 “EIA not required based on current alignment”. Does this include relocation
of the canal?8. 2.4.2.1 Very confusing. The floodplain of a ‘non-watercourse’ is deemed to be
part of a watercourse. Suggest DWS clarification is obtained. We would not supportextraction of summer low-flows from the canal.
9. 4.1.6. High-level flooding studies have been conducted for the site. These showthat the site is flooded during events from 1:10 years and up. More refined studiesindicate that the flooding may be mainly due to local rainfall and to a lesser extentdue to the canal overtopping. The City has been tasked with mitigating the canalflooding. The Conradie developer will have to deal with localised flooding in termsof the City’s storm water bylaw and policies. The preferred canal alignment option,its design and the fate of the existing canal should be discussed here as it will be anessential input into the flooding investigation to be conducted by the City.
10. 5.1.1 Water – the site is in a floodplain.11. 5.1.2. Elsieskraal river canal – This paragraph mentions the canal is on the edge of
the development! Is it to be realigned or not? The City will support the sensitiverestoration of the river.
12. 6.4.5.1 Storm water handling must meet the requirements of City policy.13. Annex A should include the Floodplain and River Management Policy (2009)14. Has any thought been given to possible integration/synergies between the
Conradie and the TRUP developments?15. Will NMT be considered beyond the borders of the site?16. These comments apply equally to the second draft of the consultation NID.
Department: Electricity – 23 December 2015 (Shiraaz Swartland)
I refer to your request for comments and advise as follows:
The estimated bulk capacity required to supply the proposed 3603 residentialdwelling units and the 28450 square metres of other space is approximately 15 MVA.
1. There is a main substation located close to the development that currently hassufficient spare capacity to accommodate this load. (The estimated capacity wascalculated as an indication only, to enable comment regarding the availability ofsufficient capacity. It should not be viewed as the final demand, which must becalculated by the developers’ consultant, or the capacity that will be allocated tothedevelopment.)
2. A master site development plan, indicating the phasing of the development plansof the individual sites, ¡s required. Note that the electricity infrastructure servingeach site may not be dedicated to that site alone. Infrastructure such as substationsites may be required to serve a wider area or future phases of the project.
Page 5 of 10
3. Individual site development plans are required prior to or concurrently withsubdivision applications and not thereafter.
4. A development framework detailing the overall policy, goals and principles for thedevelopment as well as development limitations in terms of density and floor spacewill be required.
5. The approved Heads of Agreement is requested for scrutiny and further commentin order to ascertain the impact of the development on this department.
6. The phasing of electricity services and implications detailed on page 67 of thereport is subject to change depending on the phasing of the proposeddevelopment and the integration of the internal electrical reticulation of theproposed development with the department’ s existing electrical infrastructure..
7. Any alterations to or deviation of electricity services necessary, as a consequenceof the proposal or requested by the applicant, will be carried out at the applicantscost.
8. A servitude for electricity services is located in the fringes of the north-easternportion of the area in question. If this area is to be developed, consultation with thisdepartment will be required.
9. Substation sites will be required in locations approved by this department. Theseproperties shall be directly accessible from the public road and shall not betransversed by any other services. Sites required can take the form of acombination of the following:
a. Outdoor substations on 5m x 4m sitesb. Substation buildings on 20m x 14m sites
These substations shall be appropriately subdivided and zoned in the planapproved by the surveyor general.
10. The electricity reticulation network is to be installed in the road reserve with asidewalk width sufficiently wide to accommodate the electricity network required.Special attention will be required where high voltage cables are to beaccompanied.
11. The property owner is required to include in the development measures to improveenergy efficiency to reduce the consumption of electricity.
Department: Transport for Cape Town – 23 December 2015 (Marissa Adams)
1. Roadsa. Bulk External Roads
Input required from Transport (Tony Vieira) with respect to alignment; time framesfor implementation; acquisition of land and parties responsible for costs and theoffsetting of development contributions.
Input required from Transport (TIA section)
Page 6 of 10
b. Internal Roads (on site roads)The 16m road reserve is not adequate to accommodate the proposed layout.Parallel parking bays must have minimum width of 2.5m. Two way roads to haveminimum width of 6.1m kerb to kerb. Transport (TIA) to comment on width of trafficlanes w.r.t. the inclusion of bicycle lanes in them. Cable zones to be identified onverges to ensure that tree planting opportunities are not compromised. Provision tobe made for street furniture (bus shelters / service boxes / canopies) to ensureadequate pedestrian space and minimum clearances. Detail road design for thelater approval by this district office.
2. Stormwatera) Bulk interventions
Approval required from Catchment Management (Ben de Wet) along withcomment on development contributions.
b) On site servicesApproval required from Catchment Management (Ben de Wet) w.r.t. detentionponds and SUDS. Stormwater reticulation network for the later approval by thisdistrict office.
3. Development contributionsThis report will suffice for the rezoning application to sub divisional area as nodevelopment contribution is triggered at this stage since no additional rights will beacquired beyond the existing uses (Limited Use zone). The basket of rightstable (with associated existing rights) will be required with the rezoning applicationto more intensive use in order to calculate development contributions.
Department: Spatial Planning and Urban Design – 24 December 2015 (Liezel Kruger-Fountain)
1. IntroductionFollowing a pre-application meeting, where the Concept Development Frameworkwas tabled, we were requested to provide comment on this Phase 1 Conceptdevelopment. This represents a 22ha site with residential development of 3 603dwellings (split between 49% social housing and 50% market related rental, officesfor 13 252m², Retail of 9 180m², 2 primary/secondary schools for around 1 540learners, open green space and a community hall. The aim is start implementationfrom March 2018.
2. Alignment with spatial planning policy guidelines and frameworksThe proposals as set out in the Concept Development Framework (Dec 2015) isgenerally in alignment with the provisions of the Cape Town Spatial DevelopmentFramework (2012) and the Table Bay District Plan (2012) (TBDP) in terms of mixeduse intensification and increased densification through inclusionary housingproposals. It also proposes to integrate the site visually and physically with the
Page 7 of 10
existing surrounding residential areas and aim to integrate the green links with thenew development (Elsieskraal River Canal).
3. General discussiona. Integration between the Conradie site and the future Mupine development is
important to create an integrated area rather than 2 independent sites. This willassist in creating community and enable the utilisation of other uses by both.Adequate amenities and community facilities for both should therefore be takeninto account.
b. Transport and general service capacity is very limited and must be resolved in theunlocking of this site. A focus on creating Safe pedestrian routes between schoolsand residential areas can contribute to the legibility of the area.
c. Spatial challenges and constraints identified (p.19) offer clear direction for thedevelopment of the area. This includes better legibility, hierarchy and streetnetworks and ease of access, enclosure (but not gated-communities) andtransition in built form between the proposed and the existing so as create a moreintegrated community.
d. Suggest a ‘concept diagram’ to go with the main elements of the developmentconcept (on p.24, 6.1). This could be high level diagram with big arrows/characterareas, etc. This diagram then becomes the guiding ‘brief’ for the eventualDevelopment Framework (phase 2). It is important to assist the City in having keyobjectives and principles to hold on to in future phases of the application. Thestrengthening of this section could be very helpful – keep as a 2 page spread.Maybe it should be more at the back of the section (6) rather than the front.Unpack first the road to the concept and then define the concept elementsclearly.
e. Move Section 6.2 then forward (see note below). Also suggest that point 8 is cutfrom the ‘main elements and rather put forward as a separate paragraph talkingabout the reason why variations 3a and 3b are not taken forward. i.e. section 6.6(p.41) is too short and could be bulked up a bit.
f. Has the option of higher densities and taller built form at the centre of the sitebeen looked at? The current proposal suggests the stronger built form on theedges (fig 24; p35) which is then not as easily transitioned to the surroundingcommunities. If the core (heart) of the development is stronger, it would alsocontribute to the legibility of the area and give clear direction as to where higherorder activities can be found. It could also strengthen the movement hierarchyand allow for movement patterns to assist in integrating the community.Alternatively the transition along the edges must be very carefully handled (builtform wise) so as to not result in development turning its back (please see UrbanDesign Policy. Suggest that the blocks along the edges must receive additionaldesign focus. The creation of clear public and private spaces will go a long way in
Page 8 of 10
creating integrated communities. Creating private spaces (back gardens)exposed to the edges will not assist in this.
g. The landscape design and storm water attenuation section is welcomed.
h. Concern about the size of residential units of around 43 – 45m². Not clear if theseare all rental units or if future additions to units are possible, taking into account thegeneral momentum. The reason is so as to not create slum conditions, i.e. thepublic realm in such areas must be so carefully planned and designed that cleardistinction is drawn from the outset.
i. Would suggest that character areas are developed from the ConceptDevelopment Framework so that the site is not broken up into built form types, butrather character types, i.e. what makes a certain area different – what is it’scharacter and how does the built form respond to this? The ConceptDevelopment Framework could already establish these character areas andestablish design briefs/principles for their development, i.e. supporting anintegrated development with variation throughout, rather than boxed in areas.This will also help with the social integration between people rather than separatethem according to ‘built form’ – a very delegate design decision. Use the builtform to strengthen integration.
j. Gross density identified as 164du/ha with a Nett Density of close to 300du/ha. Thisis very high and care need to be taken as to the development. From experience,there will have to be a considered effort to keep the development to well definedprinciples and objectives and to not relax on these until the end otherwise thedevelopment will become less-desirable. The transition between phases and allphase’s focused approach is necessary. The maintenance and management ofthe community from the outset is also critical so as to establish a sense ofcommunity. I suggest the establishment of community leaders that is ‘placed’ firstto help in new residents. They offer advice as to how the system will work, howpeople should act within the community, where information if found, etc. Withhigh density developments, one needs to be proactive with community-making,not just place-making! This is all part of the ongoing management of an area buthas to start early.
k. In light of a very rapid development process envisioned, we suggest that theDevelopment Framework (phase 2) be initiated ASAP. The current ConceptDevelopment Framework should therefore please clearly identify the strategy tobe incorporated into the eventual Development Framework of Phase 2): Thisstrategy must identify key objectives and development principles that can beunpacked in the Development Framework. It is critical to have these defined and‘bought into’ ASAP so as to support the rapid speed of the rest of the process.
Page 9 of 10
l. With this is the establishment of community facilities ASAP, i.e. not merely theprovision of housing. Communities are formed around community functions andtherefore, if these are delivered later, the sense of community cohesion ishampered. We therefore stress the importance of establishing/funding andprovision of community facilities very early on in the process – lessons fromDunoon. In addition, the establishment of the green infrastructure (trees/plants)early on would contribute to the feeling of a more established environment earlieron. Pre-planting can be done early on so as to afford the growing/establishmentof the trees until such time as the community moves in.
m. The FINAL Development Framework must develop clear design guidelines to assistthe SDP processes to follow. Without these, the individual SDPs and their evaluationcould cause lengthy periods so assisting a clear and defined way forward is veryimportant. Alignment to the Development Framework will be key, i.e. theimportance of having the Development Framework (not just a concept DevFramework) is critical to take the process forward and help the City to assist therapid process.
n. The NID refers to (in the recommendations) to Urban Design Guidelines – can thisbe clearly evaluated and incorporated into the Development Framework (as wellas Conceptual Framework). Links between the various reports should bereinforced.
4. General notesa. P17 - 4.1.1 – last sentence: …mixed land-uses due to/resulting from…b. P21 - Figure 6 – missing key elements (green arrows; white triangles? – possibly add
the catchment areas for the schools in terms of walking distances)c. P31 – suggest you move the second sentence to the top/as the start of the 6.4
sectiond. P47 – section 9.4 – the numbering of the bulk is unnecessary. Also, the heading is
confusing and could possibly be re-worked.e. P57 – 10.3.1 – check spelling in first paragraph.f. Not sure that mixed use development along Forest Drive is as accessibly as placing
it at the heart/along the spine of the development (lessons learned from MiltonKeynes, UK). The focus should be on creating a heart for and hierarchy within thedevelopment rather than accessibility for cars to developments.
g. P 68 – section 13 – next steps: some reference issues.
Please note the Urban Design Policy (2013) and make specific reference to it indocumentation to assist the eventual planning applications to be policy compliant.
Internationally it has been recognised that design, and more specifically urban design,can add value to development processes and play a positive role in urbantransformation. The intention of the Urban Design Policy is to guide the design process and
Page 10 of 10
formulation of development proposals so as to make Cape Town safer, more prosperousand more inclusive.
Please download policy here:http://www.capetown.gov.za/en/Planningportal/Documents/Urban%20Design%20Policy.pdf
Please minimise parking at ground floor of buildings – this goes against policy objectivesand hamper safety. Basement parking should be investigated so as to not create a sea ofparking (now or in the future).
We look forward to the development of the Development Framework (phase 2) andsubsequent SDPs from this.
1
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Appendix JCORRESPONDENCE WITH COCT SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT
1
van Beek, Bryony
From: Anthony Isaacs <[email protected]>Sent: 13 October 2015 07:57 AMTo: Snyman, JohanSubject: RE: conradie site
Morning Johan
With regards to the previous servicing of Conradie hospital it would be No we never serviced them . With regards tothe capacity of the COCT to service Conradie , we can however we would on service the office waste NO other .
RegardsAnthony IsaacsSen Superintendent Atlantic collectionSolid Waste - Collections and Drop OffTel 021 442 8100Fax: 021 448 2250Cell: 084 3333 004Email [email protected]
CITYwebMySite
From: Snyman, Johan [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: 12 October 2015 04:20 PMTo: Anthony IsaacsSubject: FW: conradie site
Hi Anthony
As discussed:
1) Did Conradie Hospital used to manage their own solid waste?2) Do COCT have capacity (and what are the implications) to service the solid waste for the site? i.e are there
restrictions in the handling capacity at Athlone Waste transfer station?
Many Thanks
2
Johan Snyman Pr Tech EngCivil Technologist
WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff, Development, Transportation and Infrastructure, Africa3rd Floor, 35 Wale Street, Cape Town, 8001, South AfricaTel: +27 21 481 8697Mob: +27 84 265 3222Fax: +27 21 481 8799
www.wspgroup.co.zawww.pbworld.com
WSP and Parsons Brinckerhoff have combined and are now one of the world's leading engineering professional services consulting firms. We bring togetherour 32,000 staff, based in more than 500 offices, across 39 countries to provide engineering and multidisciplinary services in a vast array of industry sectors,with a focus on technical excellence and client service.
This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer: http://www.wspgroup.com/en/Welcome-to-WSP-Africa/WSP-Africa/Disclaimer
WSP Group Africa (Pty) Ltd, Registered Office: WSP House, Bryanston Place, 199 Bryanston Drive, Bryanston, 2191, South Africa Registered Number:1999/008928/07 South Africa
Disclaimer: This e-mail (including attachments) is subject to the disclaimer published at:http://www.capetown.gov.za/en/Pages/disclaimer.aspx. Please read the disclaimer before opening anyattachment or taking any other action in terms of this e-mail. If you cannot access the disclaimer, kindlysend an email to [email protected] and a copy will be provided to you. By replying to this e-mail or opening any attachment you agree to be bound by the provisions of the disclaimer.
No virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2016.0.7227 / Virus Database: 4435/10953 - Release Date: 11/05/15
1
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Appendix KLIST OF CORRESPONDENCE AND MEETINGS
DAY DATE TIME VENUE CONTACT NAME/DEPARTMENT / COMPANY
CONTACT DETAILS MEETING DESCRIPTION REPRESENTATIVEFINANCIAL
TRANSACTIONADVISORY &
TECHNICAL TEAMFriday 18-09-2015 13h45 - 15h00 13th Floor, 2
Bayside, CivicCentre, CapeTown
Trade and invest:Development FacilitationUnit: CoCT
As per attendanceRegister
Stormwater Flood LinesMeeting
Kathy Ziehl-Roux,WSP Group Africa
Tuesday 22-09-2015 11h00 - 11h30 17th Floor, 2Bayside, CivicCentre, CapeTown
P Roux (CoCT Stormwater)Storm Water MasterPlanning Dept
+27 21 400 1053pierre.roux@capeto
wn.gov.za
Receive StormwaterFloodline information indata format
Kathy Ziehl-Roux,WSP Group Africa
Wednesday 23-09-2015 / Telephone and E-mail
B de Wet (CoCT Stormwater)Storm Water MasterPlanning Dept
+27 21 400 5036johannes.dewet@ca
petown.gov.za
Receive StormwaterFloodline information inCAD format
Kathy Ziehl-Roux,WSP Group Africa
Tuesday 07-10-2015 / Telephone and E-mail
P Roux (CoCT Stormwater)Storm Water MasterPlanning Dept
+27 21 400 1053pierre.roux@capeto
wn.gov.za
Receive SW master planof Salt River-received
Kathy Ziehl-Roux,WSP Group Africa
Tuesday 13-10-2015 / Telephone and E-mail
M Schmidt / C Davids (CoCT)Electricity Dept
+27 21 444 2181calvin.davids@capet
own.gov.za
Existing ElectricalInfrastructure (Ongoing)
Kathy Ziehl-Roux,WSP Group Africa
Wednesday 07-10-2015 / Telephone and E-mail
S Manie Water (CoCT)Demand Management &Strategy
+27 21 444 0739shamile.manie@cap
etown.gov.za
Current Water andSanitation Infrastructure.Demand and futureprojects. (Ongoing)
Kathy Ziehl-Roux,WSP Group Africa
Monday 12-10-2015 / Telephone and E-mail
A Isaacs (CoCT) Atlanticcollection Solid Waste -Collections and Drop Off
+27 21 442 8100anthony.isaacs@cap
etown.gov.za
Historical Solid Wasteinformation and planned
Kathy Ziehl-Roux,WSP Group Africa
Wednesday 14-10-2015 / Telephone and E-mail
M Mulcahy, Green Cape [email protected] Green discussions Kathy Ziehl-Roux,WSP Group Africa
Wednesday 14-10-2015 / Telephone and E-mail
A Hazel, Human SettlementsWestern cape Government
+27 21 483 5616hazell@westerncape
.gov.za
Sanitation Alternativesdiscussion
Kathy Ziehl-Roux,WSP Group Africa
Thursday 15-10-2015 14h30 to15h30
Meeting G Gerber, Western CapeGovernment
Environmental issuesdiscussions
Friday 16-10-2015 09h00 to09h30
Meeting A Hazel, Human SettlementsWestern cape Government
+27 21 483 5616anthony.hazell@wes
terncape.gov.za
Sanitation Alternativesdiscussion
Kathy Ziehl-Roux,WSP Group Africa
AIDE MEMOIRE
OF
BETTER LIVING MODEL (BLMEP)
CONRADIE SITE – TELEPHONIC MEETINGS AND E-MAILS -
SUBJECT DAY DATECONTACT NAME/DEPARTMENT /
COMPANYMEETING DESCRIPTION
Storm water Wednesday 23-09-2015 B de Wet (CoCTStormwater) Storm WaterMaster Planning Dept
Receive Stormwater Floodlineinformation in CAD format.
Storm water Tuesday 06-10-2015 P Roux (CoCTStormwater) Storm WaterMaster Planning Dept
Receive SW master plan of SaltRiver-received.
Elictricity Tuesday 13-10-2015 M Schmidt / C Davids(CoCT) Electricity Dept
Existing Electrical Infrastructure(Ongoing)
Water &Sanitation
Wednesday 07-10-2015 S Manie Water (CoCT)Demand Management& Strategy
Current Water and SanitationInfrastructure. Demand andfuture projects. (Ongoing)
Solid Waste Monday 12-10-2015 A Isaacs (CoCT) Atlanticcollection Solid Waste -Collections and Drop Off
Historical Solid Wasteinformation and planned
Sustainability /Green Design
Wednesday 14-10-2015 M Mulcahy, GreenCape
Going Green discussions.Received e-mail information onGreen Design.
Sanitation Wednesday 15-10-2015 A Hazel, HumanSettlements WesternCape Government
Sanitation Alternativesdiscussion. Meeting arrangedfor Fri 16-10-2015.
Environmental Thursday 15-10-2015 Gerhard Gerber,Western CapeGovernment
To liaise with all the ProvincialDepartments to:• Identify each department’sability to contribute todevelopment vision andinnovation, based on businessunusual and define specificproject objectives and targets;• Confirm backlogs in housingand/or facilities or serviceprovision with relevantdepartments; and• Confirm departmental UAMP’s(user asset management plans)and implementationprogrammes with relevantdepartments.
Aide memoire prepared by Johan Snyman2015-OCTOBER-15
1
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Appendix LCONRADIE BLEMP SITE LOCALITY PLAN
ERF
112657
FO
R
ES
T D
R
IVE
EX
TE
N
SIO
N
R
A
I
L
W
A
Y
L
I
N
E
J
A
N
S
M
U
T
S
D
R
I
V
E
EXISTING CANAL
VIKING
PARK
THORNTON
SITE BOUNDARY
WCG
ORTHOTIC
AND
PROSTHETIC
CENTRE
JEWISH
CEMETERY
PINELANDS
CLIENT: SCALE : CHECKED: APPROVED:
DRAWN: DATE:
PROJECT No: DRAWING No: REV:
DESIGN:
PROJECT:
-
REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION CHK APD
DRAWING STATUS:
TITLE:
NTS
JULY 2016
WESTERN CAPE
GOVERNMENT
CONRADIE BLEMP
LOCALITY PLAN
25027 C001 B
A APRIL 2016 - INITIAL ISSUE - -
3rd Floor 35 Wale St. Cape Town 8000
PO Box 2613 Cape Town 8000
Tel: +27(0)21-481-8700 Fax: +27(0)21-481-8799 www.wspgroup.co.za
WSP Group Africa (Pty) Ltd
Development, Transportation and Infrastructure
CA
D F
IL
E N
AM
E: Z
:\2
00
00
- 2
09
99
\2
05
27
- C
on
ra
die
G
am
e C
ha
ng
er P
ro
je
ct\3
. C
ivils\3
- D
ra
win
gs\3
.3
D
ra
win
gs\D
WG
S
HE
ET
S\C
00
1 L
oca
lity P
la
n re
v2
.d
wg
PLO
T D
AT
E: 2016/07/07 02:42:24 P
M
TEMPLATE VERSION 1.1
PRELIMINARY
COPYRIGHT RESERVEDC
The content of this document is privileged and confidential and may not be disclosed or reproduced
without the express authorisation of the author, being "WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD"
If drawing status = construction, a signed copy of this drawing (either in hardcopy
or electronic format) is available at the office of origin and at the office of issue.
PR No.:
1
CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016
Appendix MEXTERNAL AND INTERNAL BULK INFRASTRUCTUREPLANNING
External Bulk Infrastructure Planning
Infrastructure type Description Requirement for phase
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
Flood relief Increased capacity by diverting the ElsieskraalRiver Canal, including storm water attenuationareas
Required
Storm water On-site storm water attenuation and connectionto the Elsieskraal River Canal
Required
Water Connection to bulk line along Forest DriveExtension
Required
Sewer On-site pump station, rising main and connectionto existing bulk line across lower end of theElsieskraal River Canal
Required
Solid waste None N/A
Electricity Connection to main supply, incl. sub-stations Required
Roads & transportation Odin Road extension (including a bridge over theElsieskraal River Canal)
Required
Class 4 local access road traversing the site fromForest Drive Extsension to Odin Drive Extension –also part of the the required internal roadnetwork
Required
Local intersection upgrades andsignalisation:Forest Drive Extension/Mutual Way,Mutual Way/Jan Smuts Drive, Odin Road/ThorCrescent, Odin Road/Viking Way, 2 newaccesses off Forest Drive Extension
Required
Aerodrome Rd Extension from Odin RoadExtension to Voortrekker Road (1.4 km road link &bridge over Forest Drive Extension/Northernrailway line.)
Required
Internal Bulk Infrastructure Planning
Infrastructure type Description Requirement for phase
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
Flood relief & Stormwater
Internal storm water network Required per phase Required per phase Required per phase
Water Internal water network Required per phase Required per phase Required per phase
Sewer Internal sewer network and on-site pumpstation, rising main and connection to bulkline along Elsieskraal River Canal for the shortterm. Possibility of on-site treatment for longterm development for re-use.
Required per phase Required per phase Required per phase
Solid waste Waste collection and pick-upareas. Possibility of on-site sorting of wet anddry waste, including recycling waste, forthe long-term sustainable option.
Required per phase Required per phase Required per phase
Electricity Internal electrical reticulation, incl. sub-stations, etc. and possible long term on site‘green’ energy for site reticulation.
Required per phase Required per phase Required per phase
Roads &transportation
Internal road network incl. NMT. Required per phase Required per phase Required per phase
A Class 4 local access road over the site fromOdin Road Extension to Forest Drive Extension.
Required
A local access road from the site to theadjacent clinic.
Required