Recent activities of the IGS Regional Network Associate Analysis Centre for SIRGAS (IGS RNAAC SIRGAS)
Laura Sánchez ([email protected])Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut der Technischen Universität München (DGFI‐TUM), Munich, Germany
Recent activities of the IGS Regional Network Associate Analysis Centre for SIRGAS (IGS RNAAC SIRGAS)
Laura Sánchez ([email protected])Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut der Technischen Universität München (DGFI‐TUM), Munich, Germany
Symposium SIRGAS 2015, 18‐20 November 2015, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
The SIRGAS Reference Frame is composed currently by 389 continuously operating GNSS stations and itcomprises two hierarchy levels: a core network (SIRGAS‐C) providing the primary link to the global ITRF; andnational reference networks (SIRGAS‐N) improving the geographical density of the reference stations andensuring the accessibility to the global reference frame at national and local levels. The SIRGAS referencestations are processed by 10 SIRGAS Processing Centres (CEPGE Ecuador, CNPDG‐UNA Costa Rica, CPAGS‐LUZVenezuela, DGFI‐TUM Germany, IBGE Brazil, IGAC Colombia, IGN Argentina, IGM Chile, INEGI Mexico, SGMUruguay), who generate loosely constrained weekly solutions to be integrated in a unified solution for the entirenetwork. The individual solutions are combined by the SIRGAS Combination Centres: DGFI‐TUM and IBGE. Asresponsible for the IGS Regional Network Associate Analysis Centre for SIRGAS (IGS RNAAC SIRGAS), DGFI‐TUMprocessed the entire SIRGAS reference network since June 1996 until August 2008. Now, DGFI‐TUM supportsSIRGAS by1) processing the SIRGAS‐C core network (Fig. 1)2) combining the core network with the national reference networks (Fig. 2)3) ensuring that the SIRGAS processing strategy conforms the IERS standards and IGS guidelines (Fig. 3)4) developing strategies to guarantee the reliability of the reference frame through time, this includes
‐ estimation of the reference frame kinematics (Fig. 4)‐ evaluation of the seismic impacts on the reference frame (Fig. 5)‐modelling crustal deformation in the SIRGAS region (Fig. 6)
5) making available the SIRGAS products via www.sirgas.org and ftp.sirgas.org.
Fig. 6 – Post‐seismic deformation model VEMOS2015 and its comparison with the pre‐seismic model VEMOS2009.
Fig. 1 – Core and national networks within the SIRGAS Reference Frame
Fig. 2 ‐ Quality control of the individual solutions delivered by the SIRGAS Analysis Centres as well as of the combined solutions computed by the IGS RNAAC SIRGAS(time span GPS weeks 1810 – 1865).
Standard deviation of station positions after solving theindividual solutions with respect to the IGS ReferenceFrame. These values represent the formal errors of theindividual solutions. Processing Centres applying theBernese GNSS Software present values about ±1,6 mm,while Processing Centres using GAMIT/GLOBK havevalues of 2,0 mm.
Time series of the RMS of the station positionresiduals for each analysis centre with respect to theIGS weekly solutions. This comparison allows to assessthe accuracy of the individual solutions; i.e. about ±2mm in the North and the East, and ±5 mm in theheight . Outliers in the IGM‐CL and LUZ‐VE series haveto be further studied.
Time series of the RMS of the station position residualsfor each analysis centre with respect to the SIRGASweekly solutions. Outliers in the LUZ‐VE series for theEast component have to be further studied.
Quality evaluation of combined SIRGASsolutions: The mean standard deviation ofthe combined solutions agrees quite wellwith those computed for the individualcontributions, i.e. the quality of the individualsolutions is maintained and theircombination does not deform or damage theinternal accuracy of the entire SIRGASnetwork. The coordinates repeatability in theweekly combinations provides an estimate ofthe accuracy (internal consistency) of theweekly combinations of about ±1.2 mm inthe horizontal component and about ±3.5mm in the vertical one. The RMS valuesderived from the time series for stationpositions and with respect to the IGS weeklycoordinates indicate that the reliability of thenetwork (external precision) is about ±1.5mm in the horizontal position and ±4.0 mmin the height. The differences respect to theIBGE weekly combinations are at theexpected level (less than 0.5 mm).
Fig. 3 – Inventory for the second SIRGASreprocessing. It is necessary for computing all daily and weekly normal equations of the reference frame applying the new IERS and IGS guidelines. This inventory was performed from 1997 until 2014; as an example the daily RINEX file availability for the year 2014 is shown.
Fig. 4 – Multiyear solution SIR15P01. It covers the time span from 2010.2 to 2015.2, includes 303 stations and refer to the IGb08, epoch 2013.0. Its accuracy is estimated to be 1.8 mm in the horizontal position, 3.5 mm in the vertical position, 1.0 mm/a in the horizontal velocities and 1,2 mm/a in the vertical velocities.
Fig. 5 – Station discontinuities (left) and post‐seismic relaxation movements (right) identified in the SIRGAS reference stations from March 2010 to April 2015.
