![Page 1: Radiation in high-^s final states Peter Skands (FNAL) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester) ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56649f155503460f94c2aa73/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Radiation in high-^s final states
Peter Skands (FNAL)
with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester)
ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005
![Page 2: Radiation in high-^s final states Peter Skands (FNAL) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester) ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56649f155503460f94c2aa73/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Overview
• QCD @ high energy: scales, logs & hands
• Tevatron: ttbar production
• LHC: ttbar production
• LHC: SUSY pair production
![Page 3: Radiation in high-^s final states Peter Skands (FNAL) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester) ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56649f155503460f94c2aa73/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Collider Energy ScalesHARD SCALES:HARD SCALES:
• s : collider energy
• pT,jet : extra activity
• QX : signal scale (ttbar)
• mX : large rest masses
(s, m2? , . . . )
p2? ;jet
m2p
m2p
Q2Xs
![Page 4: Radiation in high-^s final states Peter Skands (FNAL) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester) ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56649f155503460f94c2aa73/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Collider Energy ScalesHARD SCALES:HARD SCALES:
• s : collider energy
• pT,jet : extra activity
• QX : signal scale (ttbar)
• mX : large rest masses
SOFT SCALES:SOFT SCALES:
• : decay widths
• mp : beam mass
• QCD : hadronisation
• mi : small rest masses+ “ARBITRARY” SCALES:+ “ARBITRARY” SCALES:
• QF , QR : Factorisation & Renormalisation
(s, m2? , . . . )
p2? ;jet
m2p
m2p
Q2Xs
![Page 5: Radiation in high-^s final states Peter Skands (FNAL) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester) ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56649f155503460f94c2aa73/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Approximations to QCD
1.1. Fixed order matrix elements: Truncated expansion in Fixed order matrix elements: Truncated expansion in SS • Full intereference and helicity structure included to Full intereference and helicity structure included to
given order. given order. • Divergences appear as low-pDivergences appear as low-pTT log divergences. log divergences.• Difficulty (computation time) increases rapidly with final Difficulty (computation time) increases rapidly with final
state multiplicity state multiplicity limited to 2 limited to 2 5/6. 5/6.
2.2. Parton Showers: infinite series in Parton Showers: infinite series in SS (but only singular (but only singular terms = collinear approximation).terms = collinear approximation).
• Resums logs to all orders Resums logs to all orders excellent at low p excellent at low pTT. . • Factorisation Factorisation Exponentiation Exponentiation Arbitrary multiplicity Arbitrary multiplicity• Easy match to hadronisation modelsEasy match to hadronisation models• Interference terms neglected + simplified helicity Interference terms neglected + simplified helicity
structure structure large uncertainties away from singular large uncertainties away from singular regions.regions.
![Page 6: Radiation in high-^s final states Peter Skands (FNAL) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester) ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56649f155503460f94c2aa73/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
A soft jet in Geneva?
A handwaving argument
• Quantify: what is a soft jet?
![Page 7: Radiation in high-^s final states Peter Skands (FNAL) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester) ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56649f155503460f94c2aa73/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
A soft jet in Geneva?
A handwaving argument
• Quantify: what is a soft jet?
• Handwavingly, leading logs are:
• So, So, very roughlyvery roughly, logs become large for jet p, logs become large for jet pTT
around 1/6 of the hard scale.around 1/6 of the hard scale.
®s log2(Q2F =p2
? ;jet)
! O(1) for QFp? ; j et
» 6
![Page 8: Radiation in high-^s final states Peter Skands (FNAL) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester) ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56649f155503460f94c2aa73/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
ttbar + jets @ Tevatron
SCALES [GeV]s = (2000)2
Q2Hard ~ (175)2
50 < pT,jet < 250
RATIOSQ2
H/s = (0.1)2
1/4 < pT / QH < 2
Process characterized by:
• Threshold production (mass large compared to s)
• A 50-GeV jet is reasonably hard, in comparison with hard scale ~ top mass
![Page 9: Radiation in high-^s final states Peter Skands (FNAL) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester) ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56649f155503460f94c2aa73/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
ttbar + jets @ Tevatron
NLO K-factorNo K-factor No K-factor
SCALES [GeV]s = (2000)2
Q2Hard ~ (175)2
50 < pT,jet < 250
RATIOSQ2
H/s = (0.1)2
1/4 < pT / QH < 2
![Page 10: Radiation in high-^s final states Peter Skands (FNAL) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester) ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56649f155503460f94c2aa73/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
ttbar + jets @ Tevatron
NLO K-factorNo K-factor No K-factor
Hard tails: • Power Showers (solid green & blue) surprisingly good (naively expect collinear approximation to be worse!)• Wimpy Showers (dashed) drop rapidly around top mass.
Soft peak: logs large @ ~ mtop/6 ~ 30 GeV fixed order still good for 50 GeV jets (did not look explicitly below 50 GeV yet)
SCALES [GeV]s = (2000)2
Q2Hard ~ (175)2
50 < pT,jet < 250
RATIOSQ2
H/s = (0.1)2
1/4 < pT / QH < 2
![Page 11: Radiation in high-^s final states Peter Skands (FNAL) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester) ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56649f155503460f94c2aa73/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
ttbar + jets @ LHC
SCALES [GeV]s = (14000)2
Q2Hard ~ (175+…)2
50 < pT,jet < 450
RATIOS:Q2
H/s = (0.02)2
1/5 < pT / QH < 2.5
Process characterized by:
• Mass scale is small compared to s
• A 50-GeV jet is still hard, in comparison with hard scale ~ top mass, but is now soft compared with s.
![Page 12: Radiation in high-^s final states Peter Skands (FNAL) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester) ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56649f155503460f94c2aa73/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
ttbar + jets @ LHC
Hard tails: More phase space more radiation.• Power Showers still reasonable (but caution advised!)• Wimpy Showers (dashed) drop catastrophically around top mass.
• Soft peak: logs slightly larger (scale larger than mtop, since not threshold dominated here) but fixed order still reasonable for 50 GeV jets.
SCALES [GeV]s = (14000)2
Q2Hard ~ (175+…)2
50 < pT,jet < 450
RATIOSQ2
H/s = (0.02)2
1/5 < pT / QH < 2.5
![Page 13: Radiation in high-^s final states Peter Skands (FNAL) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester) ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56649f155503460f94c2aa73/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
SUSY + jets @ LHC
SCALES [GeV]s = (14000)2
Q2Hard ~ (600)2
50 < pT,jet < 450
RATIOSQ2
H/s = (0.05)2
1/10 < pT / QH < 1
Process characterized by:
• Mass scale is again large compared to s
• But a 50-GeV jet is now soft, in comparison with hard scale ~ SUSY mass.
(SPS1a)
![Page 14: Radiation in high-^s final states Peter Skands (FNAL) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester) ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56649f155503460f94c2aa73/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
SUSY + jets @ LHC
Hard tails: Still a lot of radiation (pT spectra have moderate slope)
• Parton showers less uncertain, due to higher signal mass scale. Drop of wimpy showers happens later ~ 600 GeV.
• Soft peak: logs BIG: fixed order breaks down for ~ 100 GeV jets. Reconfirmed by parton showers universal limit below 100 GeV.
SCALES [GeV]s = (14000)2
Q2Hard ~ (600)2
50 < pT,jet < 450
RATIOSQ2
H/s = (0.05)2
1/10 < pT / QH < 1
• (2 jet sample: matrix element blowing up artificially large norm. difference?)
![Page 15: Radiation in high-^s final states Peter Skands (FNAL) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester) ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56649f155503460f94c2aa73/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
pT of hard system(Equivalent to pT,Z for Drell-Yan)
Resummation necessary
Bulk of cross section sits in peak sensitive
to multiple emissions.
~uL~g + 1 jet @ LHC
pT of (~uL~g) system
ttbar + 1 jet @ LHC
pT of (ttbar) system~g~g + 1 jet @ LHC
pT of (~g~g) system
![Page 16: Radiation in high-^s final states Peter Skands (FNAL) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester) ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56649f155503460f94c2aa73/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Conclusions
• SUSY-MadGraphSUSY-MadGraph soon to be public.
• Comparisons toComparisons to PYTHIA QPYTHIA Q22- and p- and pTT22-- ordered ordered
showersshowers New illustrations of old wisdom:New illustrations of old wisdom:
– Hard jetsHard jets (= hard in comparison with signal scale) collinear approximation misses relevant termscollinear approximation misses relevant terms use use matrix elements with explicit jetsmatrix elements with explicit jets interference & helicity structure included.
– Soft jetsSoft jets (= soft in comparison with signal process, but but still e.g. 100 GeV for SPS1astill e.g. 100 GeV for SPS1a) large logarithmslarge logarithms use resummation / parton showersuse resummation / parton showers to resum logs to all orders.
![Page 17: Radiation in high-^s final states Peter Skands (FNAL) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich) & D. Rainwater (U Rochester) ILC Workshop, Snowmass CO, Aug 2005](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013101/56649f155503460f94c2aa73/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Conclusions
• SUSY-MadGraphSUSY-MadGraph soon to be public.
• Comparisons toComparisons to PYTHIA QPYTHIA Q22- and p- and pTT22-- ordered ordered
showersshowers New illustrations of old wisdom:New illustrations of old wisdom:
– Hard jetsHard jets (= hard in comparison with signal scale) collinear approximation misses relevant termscollinear approximation misses relevant terms use use matrix elements with explicit jetsmatrix elements with explicit jets interference & helicity structure included.
– Soft jetsSoft jets (= soft in comparison with signal process, but but still e.g. 100 GeV for SPS1astill e.g. 100 GeV for SPS1a) large logarithmslarge logarithms use resummation / parton showersuse resummation / parton showers to resum logs to all orders.