.
CO
Notice: VariouCompany to
and issuance
This docum
003 5-Ja
002 10-O
001 26-A
000 09-Au
REV DA
BECHT
OG&C,
NSTRUC
us aspects of thisatisfy its obligaof this documen
R
ment contains in
an-12
Oct-11
Aug-11
ug-2011
ATE
TEL
INC.
C
QU
QUEEN
CTION E
is document (andations under the Ent, Contractor doe
Electronic docRefer to the elect
© Bechteformation that is
reprod
I
I
I
I
REASO
MARICONSTRUCT
CONTR
UEENSLAND
NSLAND
MARI
ENVIRO
d associated docEnvironmental Imes not waive its r
cuments, once prtronic document
Security Lel, Oil, Gas and C
confidential andduced or disclose
ssued for Use
ssued for Use
ssued for Use
ssued for Use
ON FOR REVISI
NE FACILITITION ENVIROROL PLAN (C
D CURTIS LN
D CURTIS
NE FAC
NMENTA
cuments) have bempact Statementrights under Artic
EIS obligation
rinted, are unconmanagement sy
Level 2 - BechteChemicals, Inc. 2d proprietary to Bed without BOGC
ON
ES ONMENTAL
ECP)
G PROJECT
S LNG P
CILITIES
AL CON
een developed tot/Impact Assessmcles 12.4, 20.1, ans
ntrolled and may ystem (EDMS) fo
el Confidential 2011-2012. All riBOGCI or its affiliCI prior written p
DD
JM
DD
DD
BY
Docum
T G01-
PROJEC
NTROL P
o address commment Study (“EISand 31.3 relating
y become outdateor the current rev
ights reserved. iates, clients or s
permission.
MNH VJ
TW TW
GR VJ
VJ BB
CK’D APP
JOB NO
ment Numbe
-GHX-00086
CT
PLAN (C
mitments and conS”) for the Projecg to the impacts a
ed. vision.
suppliers, and ma
J
W
J
B
PR
O. 25566-100
r R
Pag
CECP)
ditions required ct. By preparationassociated with th
ay not be used,
Revision
003
ge 1 of 110
for n he
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Revision 003
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction 1
1.1. Purpose 1
1.2. CECP Objectives 2
2. Project Description – Construction Dock and Initial Site Access 2
2.1. Surrounding Development 2
2.2. Location and Description 3
2.3. Proposed Works 4
2.4. Major Facilities 5
2.5. Construction Sequence 6
2.6. Bulkheads 7
2.7. Fender/Mooring Piles 7
2.8. Navigation Aids and Marine Signage 7
2.9. Ramps 8
2.10. Lighting 8
2.11. Hydrodynamics 10
3. Project Description – Materials Offloading Facility 11
3.1. Overview of the MOF 11
3.2. Surrounding Development 11
3.3. Location and Description 11
3.4. Seawater Intake Outfall 15
3.5. Proposed Works 15
3.6. Construction Sequence 16
3.7. Bulkheads 18
3.8. Fender/Mooring Piles 19
3.9. Structures 19
3.10. Navigation Aids and Marine Signage 19
3.11. Ramps 19
3.12. Lighting 19
3.13. ASS Strategy for MOF 21
3.14. Hydrodynamics 21
4. Project Description – LNG Jetty 22
4.1. Overview of the LNG Jetty 22
4.2. Lighting 24
5. Project Description – Tidal Area Infrastructure 28
5.1. Sedimentation basins (1, 2, 4) 28
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Revision 003
5.2. East Diversion Ditch Outfall Apron 28
5.3. General Site Development 28
5.4. Lighting 28
6. Legislative Framework 29
6.1. National Strategies 29
6.2. Commonwealth Legislation 29
6.3. Queensland Legislation 29
6.4. Guidelines and Standards 30
6.5. Licenses and Permits 32
7. Construction Environmental Risk Assessment 33
8. Environmental Management Process 33
8.1. Environmental Policy 33
8.2. Gladstone Port Corporation Environmental Policy 34
8.3. Roles and Responsibilities 34
8.4. Reporting Requirements 36
8.5. Environmental Procedures and Forms 36
9. EIS Risk Assessment 37
9.1. Environmental Risks associated with Marine Facilities 38
9.2. Habitat Impacts 38
9.3. Construction Noise 50
9.4. Lighting 52
10. Site Specific Environmental Aspects 54
10.1. General Construction 55
10.2. Construction Noise and Vibration 57
10.3. Soil Erosion and Sediment Control 59
10.4. Management of Acid Sulphate Soils 61
10.5. Waste Management 63
10.6. Refuelling and Hazardous Substances Management 67
10.7. Air Quality 71
10.8. Greenhouse Gas 73
10.9. Marine Water Quality 74
10.10. Weed and Pest Management 78
10.11. Terrestrial Flora and Fauna 79
10.12. Marine Flora and Fauna 80
10.13. Marine Pest Management 85
10.14. Red Imported Fire Ant 86
10.15. Mosquito and Biting Midge 88
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Revision 003
10.16. Visual Amenity 89
10.17. Lighting 90
10.18. Marine Traffic Management 92
10.19. Indigenous Cultural Heritage 93
10.20. Non-Indigenous Cultural Heritage 95
10.21. Stakeholder Management 96
11. Environmental Performance 99
11.1. Environmental Inspection 99
11.2. Environmental Auditing 99
11.3. Environmental Monitoring 101
11.4. Reporting and Compliance Checking 102
11.5. Identifying Environmental Issues and Corrective Actions 102
12. Communication 104
12.1. Internal Communication 104
12.2. External Communication 104
12.3. Community Engagement and Consultation 106
13. Training and Environmental Awareness 106
13.1. New-Hire Orientation – Environmental Awareness 107
13.2. Hazardous Material Management and Spill Response Training 108
13.3. Toolbox Talks 108
13.4. Job Hazard Analysis 108
14. Emergency Preparedness and Response 108
15. Document Control 109
15.1. Document Control and Record Management 109
15.2. CECP Review 109
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Revision 003
List of Attachments
Attachment A Site Drawings
Attachment B Environmental Risk Register
Attachment C QGC Environmental Policy
Attachment D Sample Environmental Inspection Checklists
Attachment E SWIO System Operating Plan
Attachment F SWIO Operation Risk Assessment
List of Acronyms
ASS Acid Sulphate Soils
DERM Department of Environment and Resource Management
DPI&F Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries
CECP Construction Environmental Control Plan GBRWHA Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area
GPC Gladstone Port Corporation
HSSE Health, Safety, Security and Environment
JHA Job Hazard Analysis
ISA Initial Site Access
LNG Liquefied Natural Gas
MLWS Mean Low Water Springs
MNES Matters of National Environmental Significance
MSQ Maritime Safety Queensland
MSDS Material Safety Data Sheets
PASS Potential Acid Sulphate Soils
QASSIT Queensland Acid Sulphate Soils Investigations Team
QCLNG Queensland Curtis Liquefied Natural Gas
QGC Queensland Gas Company
RIFA Red Imported Fire Ants
SEPWC Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities
SOPEP Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan
WHA World Heritage Area
WMS Work Method Statement
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 1 Revision 003
1. Introduction
1.1. Purpose
The intention of this CECP is to describe Bechtel’s system for managing environmental risks
associated with construction activities within or immediately adjacent to the marine environment (at
or below MHWS 1.77m or AHD), such as erosion, stormwater emissions or waste management,
associated with construction activities for marine facilities and associated infrastructure for the
QCLNG Project on Curtis Island covered by EPBC referral 2008/4401, including:
Initial Site Access (ISA); Construction Dock; Materials Offloading Facility (MOF) (with Seawater Intake and Outfall Structure (SWIO)) LNG Jetty; General Tidal Works
Site plans illustrating the location of these facilities are included as Attachment A, below.
This CECP does not apply to scope of work which is executed above the MHWS 1.77m (AHD)
elevation. The Construction Environmental Control Plan for the LNG Facilities (25566-100-G01-
GHX-00042) applies to works performed in this area.
This CECP also addresses:
Potential impacts to Matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES) (as defined under
the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act 1999), including marine
fauna such as mammals or turtles, from construction activities
Current Queensland permit Conditions of Approval issued for construction of individual marine
facilities such as the ISA, MOF, and Construction Dock and the draft Construction Dock
Operational Works Tidal Permit (OPW) – DERM and DEEDI Final Conditions.
This CECP is an overview which combines appropriate mitigation practices and environmental
management protocols for construction activities of marine facilities in general. The reader is
directed to each specific environmental permit for details regarding each facility. Environmental
aspects are discussed in relation to the potential environmental impact, control measures to avoid
or limit impacts and monitoring requirements.
Broad strategies for emergency response are also presented in this CECP. This CECP is not
intended to be an Engineering design document. For design drawings, calculations and details for
these infrastructure developments, please see relevant Basis of Design and design
documentation.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 2 Revision 003
1.2. CECP Objectives
The key objectives of the CECP are to:
Implement appropriate environmental management practices.
Implement a system for compliance with applicable legislation and permit requirements
Develop, implement and monitor measures to address potential environmental impacts
including potential impacts on MNES.
Respond to changes in environmental conditions during the proposed works through review
and monitoring, and control programmes.
The Marine Facilities CECP is a “live” document that will be updated as determined by Bechtel to
reflect major modifications in project execution. The construction work execution may differ from
this plan within confines of the Contract scope parameters.
2. Project Description – Construction Dock and Initial Site Access
The Initial Site Access (ISA) is the first stage of the Construction Dock, and its purpose is to allow
safe access to Curtis Island for the site preparation activities and for development of the balance
of the Construction Dock.
The purpose of the Construction Dock is to receive vessels, self-propelled RO-RO vessels and
barges, containing construction related equipment, materials, and personnel from the QCLNG
sites on the Gladstone mainland located at Auckland Point and near the RG Tanna coal facility.
The Construction Dock will also receive personnel ferries transporting workers daily to/from the
mainland.
2.1. Surrounding Development
The proposed site and adjacent lots are currently undeveloped, as illustrated in Photo 1 on the
following page, and there are no existing bulkheads or other marine structures at the proposed
location. The site is intended to be developed for LNG industry purposes for the QCLNG project.
The adjoining lot south of the site is the proposed site for the Gladstone LNG Project
(Santos/Petronas) and north of the QCLNG site is the proposed APLNG project
(Origin/ConocoPhillips) site.
25566-100
Pho
2.2.
The Qu
Island, w
frontage
approxim
area atta
The Cur
depicted
consists
with sha
surround
Ele
-G01-GHX-0008
oto 1 Existing
Locatio
eensland C
within the P
e to the Gla
mately 6km
ached to lan
rtis Island sit
d in Photo 1
s of closed R
allow waters
ding waters
ectronic docum
S© Copyright Bec
86
g Site Condit
on and Desc
urtis LNG (Q
Port of Glads
dstone Harb
north-east o
nd on Lot 2 o
te represent
on this pag
Rhizophora
s. Isolated p
of the site.
ents, once prin
Security Levechtel Oil, Gas and
tions for the
cription
QCLNG) Pro
stone, Quee
bour opposi
of Gladstone
on SP22592
ts an undula
ge. The sho
stylosa man
patches of Z
ted, are uncont
el 2 - Bechted Chemicals, Inc
Pag
Constructio
oject Constr
ensland. The
te Passage
e City, and is
4.
ating landsca
reline in the
ngroves whi
Zostera capr
trolled and may
el Confidentiac. 2011-2012. Al
e 3
on Dock and
ruction Dock
e subject sit
Islands (So
s formally de
ape, heavily
e vicinity of t
ch adjoin ex
ricorni seag
y become outdat
al ll rights reserved
ISA (Source
k and ISA a
te (refer to
outh) and F
escribed as
vegetated w
the Construc
xposed bank
rasses are
ted.
d.
Revision 003
: QGC)
are located o
Figure 1) ha
isherman’s
within the ti
with mature
ction Dock g
ks of mud a
also commo
3
on Curtis
as water
Landing,
idal work
trees, as
generally
and sand
on within
25566-100
Figu
2.3.
The maQCLNGwill facidesignestandard
2
The ISA
1. A2. A3. E4. A
b5. F
Ele
-G01-GHX-0008
ure 1: ISA an
Propose
rine facility, G site on Cur
litate the inied under theds as includ
2.3.1.
A consists of
Approach chA cofferdamEarthworks fA sloped eabarge; and Floating bert
ectronic docum
S© Copyright Bec
86
nd Construct
ed Works
located in prtis Island, isitial construce supervisioed on the dr
Initial S
five compon
hannel (dredstructure in
for the estabarth filling st
th with moor
ents, once prin
Security Levechtel Oil, Gas and
ion Dock Loc
part of the tids comprised ction phase
on of an RPrawings.
ite Access
nent parts:
ging by othecorporating
blishment of tructure with
ring and bert
ted, are uncont
el 2 - Bechted Chemicals, Inc
Pag
cation on QC
dal area, attof two phas of the QCL
PEQ, and w
(ISA)
ers and outsa RO-RO rathe road co
h protection
th piles.
trolled and may
el Confidentiac. 2011-2012. Al
e 4
CLNG Site
tached to thses – the ISALNG Projec
will be comp
side of this pamp; nnecting to tby rip rap
y become outdat
al ll rights reserved
e southern eA and Cons
ct. The maripliant with a
permit applica
the site; for beach la
ted.
d.
Revision 003
end of the ptruction Docne facility h
all of the co
ation);
anding of ag
3
proposed ck, which has been odes and
ggregate
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 5 Revision 003
2.3.2. Construction Dock
The full Construction Dock facility includes the ISA, plus the addition of the following berths:
One (1) berth for receiving the aggregates barge deliveries from RG Tanna; One (1) berth fitted out with a “linkspan” pontoon to function as the berth for receiving the
self-propelled RO-RO vessels during early stages of the project (now allowing all tide access from the vessels, which with a fixed ramp is not possible);
One (1) berth in a pontoon and gangway arrangement, that will receive the ferry vessels; and
One (1) berth to receive bunker vessels.
2.3.3. Construction Works
The general works intended for the construction of the proposed facilities include:
1. Dredging (By QGC) 2. Earthworks (Cut and Fill) 3. Pile driving 4. Backfill placement operations 5. Rock installation 6. Installation of fenders, ladder ways, floating dock, signage, covered walkways,
temporary lighting and buildings 7. Machinery operation and lighting 8. Construction related truck movements.
2.4. Major Facilities
The following list is a summary of the major facilities that will be installed.
A link span built on foundation of pipe piles, for the purposes of berthing and loading/unloading self-propelled RO-RO vessels and personnel ferries;
A jib crane on west berth of fixed dock (bunker berth) to handle the hoses, piping and manifold to offloading fuel/water through underground piping to field storage tanks.
A concrete bund area with sump for fuel manifold storage and potential spill containment along apron line of bunker berth. Calculated capacity of containment of the bund kerb and sump will be 3.6 m3 compared with 0.3 m3 of potential spill from manifold under normal operation.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 6 Revision 003
An emergency shut-down valve (ESD) on piping for fuel is to be installed on the dock side bordering connection between underground piping and manifold. The ESD, together with a one-way flow check valve, forms a double block and bleed system to prevent backflow of fuel under normal and emergency conditions. The ESD and check valve will be located inside concrete bund area.
ISA ramp consisting of a cofferdam structure of tubular pipe pile with tie back, backfilled and provided with a reinforced concrete ramp; equipped with marine fenders for the loading/unloading of heavy construction equipment. The ramp will be 16 metres in width;
The floating dock will be for personnel ferries including a pontoon and gangway, 9m in width and 24m in length;
Mooring / fender piles will be provided in order to secure the floating docks;
The gangway slope will be 1:12 (max) at highest astronomical tide (HAT) and 1:6 (max) at lowest astronomical tide (LAT);
Dock lighting will be provided as well as operational lighting; and
The docks will have suitable fenders for the vessels to rest up against during unloading and loading.
2.5. Construction Sequence
The sequence of construction shall broadly be in accordance with the following steps:
The Initial Site Access / Construction Dock construction will be worked in coordination with the dredging contractor. Dredging will commence with the access to the Initial Site Access wharf, and follow on with the Construction Dock. The initial dredging will be completed to the bulkhead line, with the piling works following, allowing sufficient space for safe clearances between the two operations.
Necessary barges, transport vessels, and rock transportation barges required for the installation of the finial selected piling system will be mobilised.
The fill materials for the Construction Dock will be sourced from the various quarry locations about the municipality of Gladstone, and transported with tug and barge from the RG Tanna facility located on the mainland.
Curtis Island survey control points will have been previously established and pile guide assemblies will be required such that piles are installed per the required specifications and dimensional tolerances.
Initial site access work areas along the Construction Dock. Once pile driving activities are progressed to a point, placement of the various rock core materials will commence and be pushed to firm ground beyond the tidal zones. This will allow for early mobilization of
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 7 Revision 003
equipment required to complete the Construction Dock and commence the overall site preparation activities on the island.
The direction for fill placement work will be from the marine side to the land side initially, as the materials will be lifted and placed from the barges. As fill areas are completed, initially for the ISA, work faces will open up to allow large trucks to be loaded from the barges, and transport onto the ISA such that work can also progress from the land side to the back face of the bulk head walls. Rock or select backfill material placement operations will be coordinated with tie rod installation.
Once the pile driving, core backfilling (if required), tie rod are substantially completed, installation of the exterior amour rock will commence. Again, this rock installation will be worked from an onshore work face and augmented with marine barge work fronts as is required.
Finalized fenders, ladder ways, floating dock, signage, walkways, lighting, guard house, first aid facilities, and temporary office structures will be installed close to the Construction Dock as this facility is being built and then put into operations for subsequent construction activities on the QCLNG project site.
2.6. Bulkheads
The tubular pipe piled bulkhead and abutment foundation will be designed to be suitable for berthing and loading/unloading self-propelled RO-RO vessels, personnel ferries and barges.
The bulkhead construction process will involve the installation of pipe piling using a combination of driven and vibratory means from a floating platform. After the bulkhead has been installed it is to be backfilled using free-draining granular material. Backfill material shall be suitable for placement inland and offshore and compaction using the selected methods.
2.7. Fender/Mooring Piles
Mooring / Fender piles will consist of pilings driven to the appropriate depth, as determined during the detailed design phase. Mooring bollards, dolphins and fenders will be installed to facilitate selected barge / ferry berthing.
Fendering systems will be installed along the front of the dock ramps and along the ferry floating dock and ISA for vessels to rest up against during unloading and loading.
2.8. Navigation Aids and Marine Signage
Navigational aids and marine signage will be defined during detailed engineering in accordance
with Maritime Safety Queensland (MSQ), and as needed to address safety concerns during
construction and operations.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 8 Revision 003
2.9. Ramps
Two forms of ramp are designed into this facility: 1. Link-span – this is a tide-floating ramp, tied onto the bulk head wall, but that moves with the
tides and allows one of the aggregate berths to dual function in receipt of the self-propelled RO-RO vessels.
2. Partial tide access ramp within the ISA – this will be a hard surfaced ramp that will allow drop front vessels to berth, specifically during mobilisation activities for the site preparation subcontract, and the follow on land based construction activities for the Construction Dock.
2.10. Lighting
Permanent lighting will be provided on the construction dock and on the floating pontoons.
Lighting will be designed for the safe operations and security of the facilities. For the bunker berth,
lighting design (including specification of fittings and equipment) will take into account relevant
hazardous area classifications. It should be noted that lighting design of the permanent facilities
will be developed taking into account an understanding of and management of potential impacts
on shipping traffic, and possible ecological impacts. Permanent plant lighting design aspects will
be presented as part of the conditioning of the operational works permits for the LNG facility.
Construction lighting is dynamic and dependent upon variables such as: The area under
construction, activities to be accomplished, safe movement of personnel and vehicles and weather
conditions. Construction lighting is typically much brighter than permanent plant lighting needs
because of the typically higher safety risks associated with construction activities. In general,
construction lighting must emulate the intensity of daytime conditions, and there is a need to
provide lighting from various angles to eliminate shadows or dark areas which would contribute to
safety risks.
Area lighting for construction, must be widespread and consistent over the entire area where
activities will take place, including the water surface if necessary.
Circumstances where minimising light spill will not be practicable include:
Lighting of the edges of structures under construction which protrude over the
water. Workers need to clearly see the edge of the structure or workfront, and any edge
protection placed for their safety. Lighting of the structure will be both from the top and
from various angles to provide illumination from all sides. By need, light will be directed
onto the water.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 9 Revision 003
As construction of jetty structures progresses from the shore out over the water, the water
area where construction is expected to progress will be directly illuminated and illumination
will move with the construction progress.
All areas of water around the workfront where there is the potential for a worker to fall into
the water will be illuminated to allow immediate recognition and emergency response to the
man-overboard situation.
Any points where boats/vessels are expected to moor will be illuminated, including water’s
surface where the boat and mooring structure meet.
Areas on the water around the structures under construction where vessels are expected
to work will be illuminated to allow the vessel master to see the structure protruding from
the water.
Areas of the water where visual monitoring must take place will be illuminated, especially if
visual monitoring for potential spills or failures must be maintained.
Any areas where workers are expected to work from a vessel or gain access from a vessel
to a structure, another vessel, or the shore will be illuminated, including the water surface.
Unfinished structures over the water may be illuminated even when construction activities
are not taking place to allow security personnel to visually detect trespassing or intrusion
onto the structure.
For permanent installations, the areas or structures to be lit are static, and unchanging, and the
operating activities in the area are typically routine.
Lighting will be focussed on to the areas required to limit the light spill, limiting exposure to
sensitive receptors, the local community, mariners, and marine or terrestrial habitat.
Management measures regarding lighting (Section 10.17, below) will be implemented during
construction.
2.10.1. ASS Strategy for Construction Dock
The ASS / PASS Strategy for the Construction Dock site is as follows:
The Construction Dock has been refined through the concept and design phases to avoid the clearance of large tracts of mangroves and subsequently the disturbance of PASS.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 10 Revision 003
Mangroves are to be cleared to the ground level in a manner which will minimise both soil disturbance and the risk of organic material entering the marine environment, as well as, meeting the acceptable health and safety work practices.
PASS on the seaward side of the Construction Dock bulkhead will be removed by dredge and mixed with alkaline seawater and underlying marine sediments. Provision will be made for inline lime dosing, through mixing of material and removal of mangrove roots. Currently, varying options for dispose of neutralised dredge spoils are currently under evaluation, and include: land reclamation at Fisherman’s Landing, disposal on Curtis Island, deep interment on Curtis Island or existing permitted sea dumping.
PASS on the landward side of the bulkhead will remain in-situ and fill placed directly over the surface. A combination of geo-fabric and geo-grid materials will be placed over the surface to prevent shear failure under the fill. A guard layer of lime will be placed on the surface under areas of proposed fill, with imported gravel or cobble fill placed over the ground reinforcement until a hard standing area above high water level is established. Shear failure and subsequent heave will be avoided by the use of ground reinforcement materials, the placement of initial gravel / cobble layers and the development of flat fill barriers. The sheet piling will then be extended ahead of the fill to allow construction of the two dock structures and the connecting embankment to the site.
The use of sheet piling in the landward side of the bulkhead as cut-off wall will cease away from the dredged inlet when ground conditions are sufficiently stable enough to allow for the use of a battered embankment slope. The seaward front and sides of the fill dock will be up to 10 metres high. These sides will be provided by a sheet pile wall around the perimeter driven into the underlying residual soils in the deeper sections or unstable areas. Where a battered fill slope is used, it will be protected from scouring and wave action by geo-textile and rock armouring. Some PASS, may however, need to be excavated and transported to a dedicated treatment area on Curtis Island.
2.11. Hydrodynamics
The design of Construction Dock is comprised of one (1) fixed dock and two (2) floating docks, which are to be anchored by pipe piling (fixed dock) and mooring and fender piling (floating docks).
As indicated in the attached hydrodynamics statement, it is expected that the proposed ISA /
Construction Dock development will pose no considerable impact on coastal processes. While
there may be instances of change to localised wave exposure and some potential instability and
erosion in the immediately adjacent areas (or areas dredged), no adverse impacts on the shoreline
remote from the immediate site or overall coastal processes will occur.
25566-100
3. Pro
3.1.
The Env
(sEIS) d
of mate
operatio
compon
importat
3.2.
The pro
develop
Pho
3.3.
The loca
arrange
1. Onethe
Ele
-G01-GHX-0008
oject D
Overvie
vironmental
describes the
erials, equip
on phases o
nent of the
tion of the va
Surroun
oposed site
ped for LNG
oto 2 Existing
Locatio
ation and lay
ment of the
e (1) RO-ROself-propelle
ectronic docum
S© Copyright Bec
86
Descript
ew of the MO
Impact Sta
e establishm
ment, plant
of the LNG
constructio
arious modu
nding Deve
is currently
industry pur
g Site Condit
on and Desc
yout of the M
MOF, as de
O berth fitteded RO-RO v
ents, once prin
Security Levechtel Oil, Gas and
tion – M
OF
atement (EIS
ment of a Ma
and perso
Facility. Th
n phase th
ules and maj
lopment
undevelope
rposes for th
tions for the
cription
MOF on the
esigned, inclu
d out with a vessels (whic
ted, are uncont
el 2 - Bechted Chemicals, Inc
Page
Materia
S) and Supp
aterial Offloa
nnel to the
e EIS furthe
he QCLNG
or modules
ed, as illustra
e QCLNG p
MOF (Sourc
e QCLNG sit
udes the foll
‘linkspan’ poch allows for
trolled and may
el Confidentiac. 2011-2012. Al
e 11
ls Offlo
plemental E
ading Facility
QCLNG si
er identifies
Project, as
required for
ated in Pho
project.
ce: QGC)
te is shown
lowing berth
ontoon to fur all tide acc
y become outdat
al ll rights reserved
oading
Environmenta
y (MOF) to f
ite during th
s the MOF a
s the facility
r the LNG Fa
to 2. The si
in Figure 2
hs:
unction as thcess from ve
ted.
d.
Revision 003
Facility
al Impact St
facilitate the
he construc
as the main
y will cater
acility.
ite is intend
below. The
he berth for ressels);
3
y
tatement
e transfer
ction and
n marine
r for the
ed to be
e general
receiving
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 12 Revision 003
2. One (1) heavy shipment unloading dock that will be able to receive:
a. Heavy cargo vessels
b. Heavy RO-RO vessels
c. General Construction Barges
d. Multi-purpose vessels
e. Other lift-on and lift-off (LO-LO) vessels;
3. One (1) berth on a pontoon and gangway arrangement, that will receive the ferry vessels;
4. One (1) berth for storing a vessel
It should be noted that vessel refuelling and bunkering are not intended to take place at the MOF.
The following list is a summary of the major facilities that will be installed.
A steel pipe piled bulkhead, tied back and backfilled with suitable material for the purposes of berthing and loading/unloading self-propelled RO-RO and LO-LO vessels and non-self-propelled barges;
The floating dock for personnel ferries will be a width of 6m;
The MOF slip will be approximately 90m clear width. This distance will allow for the Module/Cold Box vessels to manoeuvre in a safe manner during the docking/undocking operations;
Mooring/fender piles will be provided in order to secure the vessels;
The personnel gangway slope will be 1:12 (max) at highest astronomical tide (HAT) and 1:6 (max) at lowest astronomical tide (LAT);
Lighting and Navigational aids will be provided; and
The docks will have rubber rail fenders for the vessels to rest up against during unloading and loading.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 13 Revision 003
Figure 2: MOF Location and layout on QCLNG Site
25566-100
Ele
-G01-GHX-0008
ectronic docum
S© Copyright Bec
86
ents, once prin
Security Levechtel Oil, Gas and
ted, are uncont
el 2 - Bechted Chemicals, Inc
Page
trolled and may
el Confidentiac. 2011-2012. Al
e 14
y become outdat
al ll rights reserved
ted.
d.
Revision 0033
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 15 Revision 003
3.4. Seawater Intake Outfall
The Seawater Intake Outfall (SWIO) piping and structure is currently designed at an approved (permit 25b Tidal Works), temporary, location in the APLNG turning basin area. It is anticipated that the SWIO will be later installed at the MOF to avoid interference with neighbouring project activities. The temporary, and MOF locations for the SWIO are illustrated in drawings located in Attachment A, below. The SWIO System is to be used during construction of the Queensland Curtis LNG facility. The purpose of the SWIO is to provide seawater to the Reverse Osmosis (RO) Facility and to transfer effluent streams from the RO and wastewater treatment facilities to the sea-channel where these effluent streams shall be discharged through a diffuser. The SWIO shall consist of the following facilities, herein collectively referred to as the SWIO:
Offshore intake pump station and air supply facility, Onshore chemical injection facilities Seawater transfer line, Effluent stream discharge line, Offshore effluent stream discharge diffuser
The seawater intake structures, piping, and outfall will be used for a maximum of five (5) years. No specific design considerations will be made to purposefully extend the anticipated life of the SWIO beyond five years. The intake structure, diffuser, pipelines, conduits, and appurtenances will be abandoned in place or removed when service from this intake and outfall facility is no longer needed. All rock bedding material will remain in place to avoid disturbing any Acid Sulfate Soils (ASS). The SWIO will be designed using the current editions of relevant Australian and International Codes, Standards and Guidelines. Anticipated SWIO operations are described in Attachment E, below. A risk assessment outlining potential environmental and safety risks of the SWIO operations can be found in Attachment F, below. 3.5. Proposed Works
The permanent marine facility has been designed under the supervision of an RPEQ and has a design life of 20 years (Note the design life of the sea water intake / outfall system for construction activities is only 5 years, as indicated above). The proposed marine facility will be used to load and unload the following typical cargo:
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 16 Revision 003
Personnel;
Containerised bulk materials (steel, pipe, paints, insulation, piping components, electrical and instrumentation components);
Break bulk shipments of oversized cargo (vessels and equipment);
Grocery and consumables deliveries to the TWAF and offices;
Flat bed trucks with palletised deliveries (procured fabricated items);
Construction equipment (for example site vehicles, small scale earthworks equipment, cranes, trucks and manlifts);
Construction consumables (welding gases in secured bottle racks, welding rods, hand tools, small quantities of pre-packaged greases and lubricants for construction equipment maintenance and limited quantities of fuels in self-bunded storage containers compliant to AS1940);
Waste being transported by a licensed waste management subcontractor for disposal on the mainland; and
Modules.
3.6. Construction Sequence
The sequence of construction shall broadly be in accordance with the following steps:
Mobilisation to the site.
Construction of an access road from the developed site area, through the intertidal area, to the hill behind the MOF.
Clear and grub the hill behind the main bulkhead.
Remove the mangroves at the base of the hill and behind the bulkhead wall.
Push the materials form the hill to form a temporary bulkhead which a barge can be pulled up to the piles.
Curtis Island survey control points will have been previously established and pile guide assemblies will be required to ensure piles are installed per the required specifications and dimensional tolerances.
Commence construction of the quarry run rock fill groin for the heavy berth, in accordance with the approved Acid Sulfate Soils Management Plan (ASSMP).
Barge in the piles, and offload and transport the piles to the pile laydown yard. The laydown yard is to be located on the cut down hill.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 17 Revision 003
Marine architectural calculations will be performed to properly size and source vessels and barges required for the installation of the final selected piling system.
Commence piling operations using piling rigs working down both sides of the heavy berth, and other rigs across the main bulkhead wall. Piling may be completed from either land or waterside as conditions require.
With the piled walls complete, incorporate the quarry run groin within the permanent plant structure.
Upon completion of all of the piled walls, construct an earth fill cofferdam across the opening of the main berth (approximately 90m in length).
In the cofferdam berth area, proceed with the removal of the remaining mangroves and excavate the PASS for removal to treatment.
Handover excavated berth area in accordance with QGC and Contractor agreement to allow dredging operations (subject of a separate application) to commence.
When dredging works have been completed, install the fender piles for the south dock.
Relocate the floating pontoon and linkspan bridge from the Construction Dock.
Place the completed works into service.
25566-100
Figu
3.7.
The steself-prop
The bucombinais propofor placmaterialcombina
Ele
-G01-GHX-0008
ure 3: Work S
Bulkhea
el pipe piledpelled RO-R
lkhead conation of driveosed to be bacement inlanls propertiesation is avoid
ectronic docum
S© Copyright Bec
86
Sequence Gr
ads
d bulkhead RO vessels, p
struction pren and vibraackfilled usinnd and offss shall be sded.
ents, once prin
Security Levechtel Oil, Gas and
raphical Rep
will be desigpersonnel fe
rocess will atory means ng free-drainhore and cuch that exc
ted, are uncont
el 2 - Bechted Chemicals, Inc
Page
presentation
gned to be erries and ba
involve thefrom a land
ning granulaompaction ucessive sett
trolled and may
el Confidentiac. 2011-2012. Al
e 18
suitable for arges.
e installation rig. After th
ar material. Busing the stlement und
y become outdat
al ll rights reserved
berthing an
n of steel he bulkhead Backfill mateselected meer the most
ted.
d.
Revision 003
nd loading/u
pipe piles has been in
erial shall beethods. The t critical des
3
unloading
using a nstalled it e suitable
in-place sign load
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 19 Revision 003
3.8. Fender/Mooring Piles
Mooring / Fender piles will consist of pilings driven to the appropriate depth, as determined during the detailed design phase. Mooring bollards, dolphins and fenders will be installed in order to facilitate selected barge / ferry berthing and mooring.
3.9. Structures
In order to provide for both the manual personnel working on the MOF, as well as cater for security demands, one (1) temporary building is to be provided near the back of the MOF, above the HAT, which will function both as a security office and break room.
3.10. Navigation Aids and Marine Signage
Safe navigation on the approaches to and from the MOF is provided by means of navigational aids
and marine signage, to be defined during detailed engineering in consultation with Maritime Safety
Queensland (MSQ), and as needed to address those safety concerns identified.
3.11. Ramps
One form of linkspan floating ramp is proposed for the MOF and is tied onto the bulkhead wall, but
will move with the tides allowing for the receipt of the self-propelled, RO-RO vessels..
3.12. Lighting
Lighting will be provided on the MOF and on the floating pontoons. Permanent lighting will be
designed for the safe operations and security of the facilities.
Construction lighting is dynamic and dependent upon variables such as: The area under
construction, activities to be accomplished, safe movement of personnel and vehicles and weather
conditions. Construction lighting is typically much brighter than permanent plant lighting needs
because of the typically higher safety risks associated with construction activities. In general,
construction lighting must emulate the intensity of daytime conditions, and there is a need to
provide lighting from various angles to eliminate shadows or dark areas which would contribute to
safety risks.
Area lighting for construction, must be widespread and consistent over the entire area where
activities will take place, including the water surface if necessary.
Circumstances where minimising light spill will not be practicable include:
Lighting of the edges of structures under construction which protrude over the
water. Workers need to clearly see the edge of the structure or workfront, and any edge
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 20 Revision 003
protection placed for their safety. Lighting of the structure will be both from the top and
from various angles to provide illumination from all sides. By need, light will be directed
onto the water.
As construction of jetty structures progresses from the shore out over the water, the water
area where construction is expected to progress will be directly illuminated and illumination
will move with the construction progress.
All areas of water around the workfront where there is the potential for a worker to fall into
the water will be illuminated to allow immediate recognition and emergency response to the
man-overboard situation.
Any points where boats/vessels are expected to moor will be illuminated, including water’s
surface where the boat and mooring structure meet.
Areas on the water around the structures under construction where vessels are expected
to work will be illuminated to allow the vessel master to see the structure protruding from
the water.
Areas of the water where visual monitoring must take place will be illuminated, especially if
visual monitoring for potential spills or failures must be maintained.
Any areas where workers are expected to work from a vessel or gain access from a vessel
to a structure, another vessel, or the shore will be illuminated, including the water surface.
Unfinished structures over the water may be illuminated even when construction activities
are not taking place to allow security personnel to visually detect trespassing or intrusion
onto the structure.
For permanent installations, the areas or structures to be lit are static, and unchanging, and the
operating activities in the area are typically routine.
Lighting will be focussed on to the areas required to limit the light spill, limiting exposure to
sensitive receptors, the local community, mariners, and marine or terrestrial habitat.
Management measures regarding lighting (Section 10.17, below) will be implemented during
construction.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 21 Revision 003
3.13. ASS Strategy for MOF
Potential acid sulphate soils (PASS) at the MOF site can be divided into three distinctive
component zones according to the development methodology and the destination of excavated
sediment. These component zones are:
An access apron across the tidal flat between the extra-tidal residual landscape of the site and the landward edge of the small terrestrial hill (i.e. landward of the ‘battery line’).
The actual MOF construction footprint incorporating the terrestrial hill, mangrove zone and an area underlying a groin projection into the near shore.
The dredge footprint extending seaward of the area demarcated in Component Zone 2.
A complete ASSMP has been prepared covering all three component zones, inclusive of three
connected ASSMPs. These ASSMP include:
Material Offloading Facility Acid Sulfate Soils Management Plan prepared by Coffey Geotechnics Pty Ltd, retained by Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemical Inc. (Component Zone 1);
QCLNG Material Offloading Facility (MOF): Intertidal/Mangrove Zone, Curtis Island, Queensland prepared by GeoCoastal Group, retained by QCLNG Operating Company Pty Ltd (Component Zone 2); and
A further ASSMP for the seaward portion (Component Zone 3), to be associated with the Dredge Management Plan (not directly applicable to the marine facilities construction covered by this CECP).
3.14. Hydrodynamics
The design of the marine facility is comprised of one (1) RO-RO berth fitted out with a ‘linkspan’
pontoon, one (1) heavy shipment unloading dock, one (1) berth for vessel storage, and one (1)
pontoon and gangway arrangement for passenger ferry vessels, which are to be anchored by steel
pipe piles. A hydrodynamics coastal process consideration statement has been developed, and it
is expected that whilst there may be some localised changes in wave exposure, potentially
creating minor instability and erosion of immediately adjacent areas or siltation in dredged areas,
there will be no adverse impacts to the shoreline remote from the immediate site or the overall
coastal processes. Furthermore, the location and configuration of the MOF is not expected to
influence the overall prevailing coastal processes or the shoreline remote from the site.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 22 Revision 003
4. Project Description – LNG Jetty
4.1. Overview of the LNG Jetty
The EIS and SEIS describes the establishment of the LNG jetty for the loading and export of LNG
from the LNG facility.
The construction of the permanent marine facility (LNG jetty) for the export of LNG cargo will begin
with the civil and concrete installation program. The marine elements of the jetty will be an open
trestle design, and construction (and operations) will be undertaken in accordance with applicable
industry standards as referenced in Table 4-1 below.
Table 4-1: Industry Standards Applicable to Construction of Marine Facilities
Organisation Applicable Standard/Guidelines
International Maritime Organisation (IMO)
International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL). Latest edition with amendments and MEPC resolutions
International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code and SOLAS Amendments 2002, 2003 Edition
British Standards Institution British Standard Code of Practice for Marine Structures (BS 6349) – Parts 1-6
Installation and Equipment for Liquefied Natural Gas – Design of Onshore Installations (BS EN:1473)
Society of International Gas Tankers and Terminal Operators Ltd (SIGTTO)
Site Selection and Design for LNG Ports and Jetties,
Information Paper No. 14. Guidelines for Ship to Shore Access
for Gas Carriers.
LNG Operations in Port Areas.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 23 Revision 003
Organisation Applicable Standard/Guidelines
Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF)
International Safety Guide for Oil Tankers and Terminals (ISGOTT) (with International Chamber of Shipping and International Association of Ports and Harbours) Prediction of Wind Loads on Large Liquefied Gas Carriers (with SIGTTO) Prediction of Wind and Current Loads on Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCCs)
Mooring Equipment Guidelines. Guidelines and Recommendations for the Safe Mooring of Large Ships at Piers and Sea Islands
Safety Guide for Terminal Handling Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk
Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC)
Guidelines for the Design of Fender Systems
Joint PIANC-IAPH Report on Approach Channels, A Guide for Design (Vols 1 and 2)
Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material – A Practical Guide
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
NFPA 59A, Production, Storage and Handling of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
NFPA 307, Construction and Fire Protection of Marine Terminals, Piers, and Wharves
In general, construction will be undertaken as follows.
The LNG pipe rack approach for jetty construction will be carried out by ‘Over the Top’
construction methods, while the loading platform and dolphins will be constructed concurrently
using floating plant.
Conceptually, the pipe rack construction will likely utilise a crane travelling on a rail/bogey system,
which will drive piles and install headstocks, followed by a travelling gantry system, which will
install and deck girders, parapets, module pipe bridges and other follow-up works.
The loading platform and dolphin construction will be undertaken by barge- mounted pile-driving
plant and piling frame. It is envisaged that the approach pipe rack jetty, loading platform and
dolphins will be constructed at the same time.
As the LNG Jetty ‘Over the Top’ construction method is initiated, temporary roadways and
equipment pads will be required for the first two jetty pile structures. This will be the only on-grade
construction that will result in direct impact on mangrove areas working from the land.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 24 Revision 003
Due to long-term maintenance, and to prevent encroachment, the operating LNG pipe rack,
mangroves and other vegetation will be removed in a corridor approximately 10 m either side of
the jetty approach structure. The jetty approach structure is approximately 15 m wide, resulting in
removal of mangroves and vegetation in a corridor approximately 35 m wide and 70 m long. This
vegetation would be removed working from the land side through the tidal area. Outside the
construction and operation zone of influence, care will be exercised to avoid the adjacent
mangrove areas.
As the heavy civil and heavy rigging construction activities of the LNG Jetty near completion,
ancillary infrastructure will be installed, such as; terminal buildings, the LNG ship fender system,
miscellaneous steel catwalks to the mooring and breasting dolphin structures, pipe installations,
wire pulling, pipe testing, loading arm hydraulic tubing and instrumentation installations.
The location and layout of the LNG Jetty, as well as the MOF and Construction Dock, are shown in
Figure 4.
4.2. Lighting
Lighting issues for the construction of the LNG Jetty will be similar to those of the Construction
Dock and MOF. See Section 2.10 above.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 25 Revision 003
Figure 4: LNG Jetty, MOF and Construction Dock Location
25566-100
Ele
-G01-GHX-0008
ectronic docum
S© Copyright Bec
86
ents, once prin
Security Levechtel Oil, Gas and
ted, are uncont
el 2 - Bechted Chemicals, Inc
Page
trolled and may
el Confidentiac. 2011-2012. Al
e 26
y become outdat
al ll rights reserved
ted.
d.
Revision 0033
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 27 Revision 003
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 28 Revision 003
5. Project Description – Tidal Area Infrastructure
The following is a brief overview and introduction to drainage facilities that are to be partially
constructed within the tidal areas. None of these structures are marine facilities, but are part of the
site development infrastructure (land side). General overview drawings of the facilities can be
found in Attachment A.
5.1. Sedimentation basins (1, 2, 4)
These ponds collect the storm water during the Construction Phase and will continue to service
the facility during the operation of the facility. The design, capacity and location of these ponds
are such that the water is collected, channelled and managed to meet water outfall conditions.
5.2. East Diversion Ditch Outfall Apron
The east diversion ditch is located to the south of the site, adjacent to the Construction Dock. Its
function is to direct water flow from the natural watershed areas, outside of the facility, to the
outfall. The ditch and associated box culvert are not located within the tidal zone, but the outfall
rock apron is within the defined Tidal Works area. The rock apron is designed to measure and
dissipate energy from the water as it is directed to the outfall. This apron, set in concrete, is
designed to lower the water velocity which will reduce scouring and subsequent transport of
sediments into the harbour. The diversion ditches, located along the perimeter of the facility,
collect rainwater from the natural watershed area outside of the property boundaries. The
diversion ditches redirect and divert the rainwater around the site development area to discharge it
into the harbour.
5.3. General Site Development
The zone for the Tidal Works area is not a straight line, but meanders along the coastal frontage
based on natural elevation changes. The designs of the facilities along the coast line have been
optimized to fit within the undulating tidal works area, mangrove locations, wave directions and
other natural topographical and tidal features of the site.
The construction infrastructure facilities include parking, staging and lay down areas. The
permanent plant infrastructure includes roads, paving, parking and buildings.
The shoreline of the site will be protected from erosion and stormwater run off by the use of sheet
piling and rip-rap rock armour.
5.4. Lighting
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 29 Revision 003
Lighting during construction will be similar to that described in Section 2.10 above.
6. Legislative Framework
Applicable legislation, guidelines, and associated standards relevant to construction works and
environmental protection are listed below.
6.1. National Strategies
National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development 1992
National Strategy for the Conservation of Australia’s Biological Diversity 1996
National Greenhouse Strategy 1998
National Environmental Protection (Ambient Air Quality) Measure 1998
6.2. Commonwealth Legislation
Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
Native Title Act 1993
Australian Heritage Council Act 2003
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island Heritage Protection Act 1984
6.3. Queensland Legislation
Environmental Protection Act 1994
Environmental Protection Regulation 2008
Environmental Protection (Waste Management) Policy 2000
Environmental Protection (Waste Management) Regulation 2000
Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 2009
Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008
Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2008
Land Protection (Pest and Stock Route Management) Act 2002
Plant Protection Act 1989
Plant Protection Regulation 2002
Vegetation Management Act 1999
Nature Conservation Act 1992
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 30 Revision 003
Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 1996
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003
Water Act 2000
Fisheries Act 1994
Transport Operations (Marine Safety) Act 1994
Transport Operations (Marine Safety) Regulation 2004
Transport Operations (Marine Pollution) Act 1995
Dangerous Goods Safety Management Act 2001
Dangerous Goods Safety Management Regulations 2001
Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995
6.4. Guidelines and Standards
Table 6-1 below provides a list of relevant standards and guidelines that are applicable to the
construction activities at the marine facilities.
Table 6-1 Performance Guidelines and Standards
Aspect Performance Guidelines/Standards
Risk AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 Risk Management – Principles and Guidelines
Water National Water Quality Management Strategy – Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality, ANZECC/ARMCANZ, 2000.
National Water Quality Management Strategy – Australian Guidelines for Water Quality Monitoring and Reporting, ANZECC/ARMCANZ, 2000
Monitoring and Sampling Manual Version 1 2009 For sampling in compliance with the Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 2009
National Water Quality Management Strategy – Guidelines for Groundwater Protection in Australia, ANZECC/ARMCANZ, 1995.
National Water Quality Management Strategy – Australian Guidelines for Sewerage Systems – Effluent Management, ANZECC/ARMCANZ, 1997.
Department of Environment and Resource Management (2009) Queensland Water Quality Guidelines, Version 3. ISBN 978-0-9806986-0-2
Draft State Planning Policy Guidelines for Healthy Waters 2009, DERM.
Standard Methods of the Examination of Water and Wastewater – American Public Health Association (APHA)/Australian Waste Water Association (AWWA)
AS 2031 Selection of Containers and Preservation of Water Samples for Chemical and Microbiological Analysis
Waste AS 1216 Classification, Hazard identification and Information Systems for Dangerous Goods
AS 1678 Emergency Procedure Guides – Transport
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 31 Revision 003
Aspect Performance Guidelines/Standards
AS 1940 Storage and Handling of Flammable and Combustible Liquids
AS 3780 The Storage and Handling of Corrosive Substances
AS 2809 Road Tank Vehicles for Dangerous Goods
AS 2931 Selection and Use of Emergency Procedure Guides for Transport of Dangerous Goods
Soils National Environmental Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure, 1999 NEPC.
“Draft Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Contaminated Land in
Queensland” (Department of Environment 1998)
Soil Erosion and Sediment Control, Engineers Guidelines for Queensland, Institute of Engineers QLD, 1996.
Air AS 3580 Methods of Sampling and Analysis of Ambient Air
Queensland and EPA Air Quality Sampling Manual November 1997
Methods and Guidance for the Modelling and Assessment of Air Pollutants in NSW – DRAFT February 2005 (NSW EPA)
Approved Methods and Guidance for the Modelling and Assessment of Air Pollutants in NSW –August 2001 (NSW EPA)
National Road Transport Commission/ NEPC - Stationary Exhaust Noise Test Procedures for In- Service Motor Vehicles, April 2000.
Noise Queensland EPA Noise Management Manual Third Edition March 2000
AS 1055: 1997 Parts 1 & 2 Acoustics – Description and Measurement of Environmental Noise
AS 1259.2 – 1990 Acoustics – Measurement of airborne noise emitted by earth-moving machinery and agricultural tractors – Stationary test condition Part 1: Determination of compliance with limits for exterior noise
AS 2436: 1981 Guide to Noise Control on Construction, Maintenance and Demolition Sites
AS 2670.1: 2001 Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration Part 1: General Requirements
Vehicle Standard (Australian Design Rule 28/01 – External Noise of Motor Vehicles) 2006.
British Standard 7385: Part 1-1990 Evaluation and Measurement for Vibration in Buildings - Guide for measurement of vibrations and evaluation of their effects on buildings
Australian Dangerous Goods Code: Transport of Dangerous Goods
Dangerous Goods AS 1216 Classification, Hazard Identification and Information Systems for Dangerous Goods
AS 1678 Emergency Procedure Guides – Transport
AS 1940 Storage and Handling of Flammable and Combustible Liquids
AS 2508 Safe Storage and Handling Information Cards for Hazardous Materials
AS 2809 Road Tank Vehicles for Dangerous Goods
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 32 Revision 003
Aspect Performance Guidelines/Standards
AS 3780 – 1994 The Storage and Handling of Corrosive Substances
AS 2931 Selection and Use of Emergency Procedure Guides for Transport of Dangerous Goods.
Australian Dangerous Goods Code: Transport of Dangerous Goods
Marine MARPOL Annexes I, II, IV and V
International Regulations for the Prevention of Collisions at Sea
Port Procedures and Information for Shipping for the port of Gladstone
Standard for Marine Construction Activities within Gladstone Harbour (MSQ)
6.5. Licenses and Permits
Bechtel and its subcontractors will comply with the relevant licences, permits, registrations and
approvals obtained by QGC that are applicable to the construction scope of work.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 33 Revision 003
7. Construction Environmental Risk Assessment
Bechtel has used a risk management process to place appropriate environmental control
measures addressing the design and construction of the Works, and which takes into account the
relevant construction activities, standards and reasonably foreseeable misuse, on a basis of
observing the “Hierarchy of Controls” principles:
Elimination of the hazard;
Substitution with a less hazardous material, process or equipment;
Designing the equipment / process to mitigate the risk; and
Separation/isolation of the hazard to reduce the requirement for administrative/personal
protective equipment controls.
A Risk Register will be maintained electronically and will be updated throughout the duration of the
construction activities. An initial Risk Register has been prepared for construction works at the
ISA and Construction Dock and this is provided as Attachment B. Additional risks will be
assessed and control measures implemented as they are identified during further development of
Work Method Statements (WMS).
8. Environmental Management Process
8.1. Environmental Policy
Activities carried out at the marine facilities will conform to the QGC Environmental Policy as
presented in Attachment C. In order to achieve this, construction activities will be executed
according to the following:
• Compliance with current environmental and other legal requirements;
• Where possible, restriction of disturbance of fauna, flora and soil on projects;
• Prevention and reduction of waste, soil, air, water pollution and disturbance of the surroundings;
• Correct handling of environmental-threatening products and limitations of their use, where reasonably practicable;
• Rational use of water, energy, fuels and materials;
• Implementation of measures to prevent environmental incidents and emergency situations; and
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 34 Revision 003
• Encouragement of environmental awareness of all employees and subcontractors by education, training and written work instructions or procedures.
8.2. Gladstone Port Corporation Environmental Policy
Bechtel will seek to achieve the principles of the GPC Environmental Policy including:
Continual improvement in environmental performance by highlighting environmental risks,
incidents, complaints or changes in legislation.
Action is taken to prevent or control any environmental harm that may be caused.
Operating in a manner that allows for sustainable development and minimised environmental
harm to the port and surrounding areas
8.3. Roles and Responsibilities
Bechtel will be responsible for implementing and adhering to the obligations in this CECP, the
QGC and GPC Environmental Policies as stated above and the management measures as
provided in Section 6.
Each member of Bechtel project team is responsible for conforming to applicable Australian and
Queensland laws and regulations and for conducting work in accordance with permit requirements
and the CECP. Specific responsibilities of project entities and personnel are addressed in the
following sections. Furthermore, all personnel are responsible for the environmental performance
of their activities and for complying with the general environmental duty as set out in Section
319(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1994 which states:
“A person must not carry out any activity that causes, or is likely to cause, environmental harm
unless the person takes all reasonable and practicable measures to minimise the harm.”
The following table (Table 8-1) provides a summary of the likely responsibilities and
accountabilities of various parties who will have active roles in the implementation of the CECP.
Table 8-1 Summary of Roles and Responsibilities
Role Responsibilities
QGC Project proponent with overall responsibility for project delivery and commitments arising under the CECP.
Ecological monitoring and long-term studies Complaints and public relations management
Site Manager Environmental management performance.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 35 Revision 003
Role Responsibilities
Implement company environmental policies and procedures on site during the construction of the works through allocated field personnel.
Provide resources to carry out their duties compliant with the CECP.
Implement corrective actions or modify practices in order to address any complaints received.
Completion of the contract works.
Environmental Manager Maintain a master copy of the CECP containing a record of the completion of planned actions, monitoring records and reports that are made available during audits.
Implement CECP requirements on site.
Advise Contractor Site Manager with regards to environmental matters.
Conduct site specific induction training for all personnel prior to commencement of work.
Keep conditions of licenses and permits up to date and readily available on site.
Undertake regular monitoring in relation to environmental management issues and verify that monitoring results are made available to the community consultative committees.
Notify QGC of any environmental incidents including any remedial action taken.
Implement adequate and accurate identification and reporting of any non-conformances and any other environmental issues that may arise during construction.
Direct complaints received to QGC.
Environmental Inspectors (multiple)
Perform duties such as baseline surveys, assisting preparation of work plans and field compliance activities.
Raise awareness of potential environmental impacts to Project personnel such that mitigation measures and actions may be instituted to maintain compliance with Project requirements.
Review construction work plans and activities to advise and determine that proper and required environmental controls are incorporated.
Notify management of any circumstances that warrant agency notification or management action in support of effective environmental compliance.
Monitor all Field Engineering activities are planned and conducted in accordance with applicable environmental regulations and site-specific requirements.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 36 Revision 003
Role Responsibilities
When appropriate, participate in Government agency and authority meetings to review environmental requirements and compliance.
Conduct regular field inspections of construction activities for compliance with existing permits, approvals and all applicable environmental regulations.
Providing guidance to Construction Superintendents for resolution of environmental compliance issues.
Conducting Environmental Training for Construction personnel and preparing training materials and guideline sheets to facilitate compliance and communication.
Superintendent Accountable to Site Manager for execution of the Works in accordance with this CECP.
Implement the work is undertaken in accordance with the CECP, specifications and drawings.
Manage subcontractors perform work in accordance with the CECP.
8.4. Reporting Requirements
Bechtel will require its contractors to establish formal reporting as per the HSSE Incident
Recording, Reporting and Investigation Procedure. Bechtel will report environmental incidents to
QGC and QGC shall provide the applicable agency with any reports as required by law.
8.5. Environmental Procedures and Forms
Environmental procedures and forms have been prepared for to address risk and compliance
management systems. The management tools that are applicable include procedures which
provide instruction for specific environmental tasks for consistency in approach and quality of
results. Environmental procedures are developed for managing issues including water monitoring,
contamination testing, noise monitoring and dust monitoring, and are linked to the Work Method
Statements. As need arises or as conditions change, procedures, forms and checklists are
subject to change, independently of those listed in this CECP.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 37 Revision 003
9. EIS Risk Assessment
QGC has conducted environmental risk assessments as part of the EIS and permit application
process. Details of their assessment are given in this section.
QCLNG Project marine facilities with Port Curtis covered by the EPBC Marine Facilities referral
2008/4401 include:
the Initial Site Access (ISA);
Construction Dock;
Materials Offloading Facility (MOF); and
LNG Jetty.
A summary of marine habitat within Port Curtis are summarised in Table 9-1 below (source:
QCLNG EIS).
Table 9-1: Description and areas of habitat, including seagrass meadows in Port Curtis
Habitat Type Area (Ha) % Area of
Total Prominent Location(s)
Exposed mud and sandbanks 5,144 0 Eastern side of Curtis Island, Western
side of Facing Island
Exposed rocky substrate 297 0.52 Curtis, Facing, Tide and Picnic Islands
Seagrass (coastal) 7,246 12.7 Pelican Banks, Quoin Island,Fisherman’s
Landing area
Seagrass (deepwater) 6,332 11.1 Facing Island, Seal Rocks, West and East
Banks
Benthic macro-
invertebrate
communities
(including coral)
Open
substrate,
occasional
individual
9,876 17.3 Outside Facing Island from Curtis Island
to East Bank
North-west of Seal Rocks
Entrance to Rodds Bay
Low
Density
8,606 15 Throughout the Port of Gladstone / Rodds
Bay area
Medium 4,099 7.2 Southern and northern side of Seal Rocks
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 38 Revision 003
Density
High 4,189 7.3 Narrow strip in channel form
9.1. Environmental Risks associated with Marine Facilities
Key environmental risks associated with construction and operation of the marine facilities include:
Risks associated with shipping activity – these are addressed in the QCLNG Shipping Activity
Management Plan and are not addressed further herein;
Impact on inter-tidal habitat – potential impacts include:
Loss of habitat for migratory birds – these are addressed in the QCLNG Migratory
Shorebird Management Plan – Marine Infrastructure, QCLNG Curtis Island and are not
addressed in detail herein, although mitigation measures associated with migratory birds
are included in Section 10.12;
Potential loss of habitat for the Water Mouse (Xeromys myoides) – these are addressed
in the QCLNG Environmental Management Plan - Water Mouse (Xeromys myoides)
Impact on marine habitat, and especially seagrass, as a result of construction of the facilities –
refer Section 9.2 below;
Disturbance of marine life by noise, especially during construction – refer Section 9.3 below;
Disturbance of marine life by lighting – refer Section 9.4 below..
Detailed management plans addressing these and other environmental aspects are provided in
Section 10. A high level discussion of risks specific to MNES is provided below, providing context
for the detailed management plans provided in Section 10.
9.2. Habitat Impacts
9.2.1. Seagrass Impacts
Seagrasses are true flowering plants found between intertidal and subtidal habitats. Seagrasses
play a major role in marine ecosystem functioning including as a substrate, nursery area and
providing shelter and food for organisms as well as physical stability of the coastline and seafloor.
They are essential food sources for a variety of marine and estuarine organisms including
dugongs, turtles, fish and macro-invertebrates
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 39 Revision 003
Within the Port Curtis region, seagrass has been regularly monitoring by the Department of
Primary Industries and Fisheries (DPIF) Marine Ecology Group in collaboration with the Port Curtis
Integrated Monitoring Program (PCIMP). Within the Port of Gladstone, the following six seagrass
species have been identified:
Halodule uninervis
Halophila ovalis
Halophila decipens
Halophila minor
Halophila spinulosa
Zostera capricorni
A total of 7,246 ha of intertidal (coastal) seagrass beds have been identified within the Port of
Gladstone – Rodds Bay Dugong Protection Area (DPA), with an additional 6,332 ha in deepwater
areas (>5m Mean Sea Level) indentified to the east and south of Facing Island. No deepwater
seagrass communities have been reported within the inner-port area.
Port Curtis is located within the Rodds Bay Dugong Protection Area (DPA), with this area covering
the entire coastal zone between Rodds Bay and the Narrows.
Surveys utilised in the assessment of seagrass beds include the 2002 Port-wide baseline survey
and the 2009 PCIMP Intertidal and Coastal Monitoring Program (unpublished) survey, both
conducted by the DPIF. The surrounding area of the proposed ISA / Construction Dock marine
facility, LNG Jetty / trestle, and MOF and were further confirmed through in-situ surveying
undertaken in January 20101 and June 20102 by Vision Environment on behalf of QGC..
ISA / Construction Dock
For the ISA / Construction, the 2002 survey report found seagrass beds in the development extent
within the area required to be dredged. An intertidal seagrass meadow was evidenced to occur
along the Curtis Island shoreline, comprising an area of 6.5 + 0.7 hectares, which was partially
1 Vision Environment, 2010. Mangrove & Seagrass Assessment. Unpublished report for QGC, January 2010
2 Vision Environment, 2010. Materials Offloading Facility, Trestle & Early Landing Areas: Marine Plants Survey.
Unpublished report for QGC, June 2010
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 40 Revision 003
located (1.72 ha) within the bounds of the area to be dredged. The seagrass meadow consisted of
isolated patches of Zostera capricorni and isolated patches of Halophila ovalis, with a relatively low
biomass of 0.28 + 0.28gDWm-².
The 2009 survey by contrast, indicates that the seagrass meadow which was evident in 2002 had
decreased substantially. The decrease in area of the seagrass meadow has meant that it is no
longer present within the development extents of the proposed ISA / Construction Dock, but is
present to the southeast of the development site, covering 2 + 0.26 hectares of the intertidal
shoreline. The meadow has also changed in terms of species with only isolated patches of
Halophila ovalis remaining present, with an equally low biomass of 0.0038gDWm-².
Although the seagrass meadows are no longer present within the development (including
dredging) area, low cover patchy meadows in the area, such as those present in 2002, are likely to
vary considerably dependent upon season and year. Despite the lack of seagrass in the 2009
survey report, the site area can be regarded as a suitable seagrass habitat, and therefore, it would
be reasonable to assume that seagrasses may occur at the site again if the environmental
conditions are suited to their needs
Whilst no seagrass beds were directly located at the ISA and Construction Dock during recent
surveys, seagrasses are transient in nature and the site can be considered a suitable habitat. If
there are seagrass meadows located within the subject site at the time of construction they will be
directly impacted. These impacts would result from factors such as: seabed disturbance from the
various building works required, mooring / fender piling works, dredging, and associated
earthworks occurring within the tidal area. Seabed disturbance will not only directly alter the
density of the seagrass but also suspended sediment may smother seagrass beds or lessen light
availability in the water column reducing the density and condition of the seagrass in the area
affected. However, given the lack of seagrass cover at time of survey, and the extent of seagrass
through Port Curtis as summarised in Table 8-1, direct impacts arising from construction of the
Construction Dock are anticipated to be minimal .
Extent of seagrass at the Construction Dock in the 2002 and 2009 DPIF survey and the area of the
2010 survey are shown in Figure 5 below3.
MOF / LNG Jetty
3 Figure taken from Vision Environment, 2010. Mangrove & Seagrass Assessment. Unpublished report for QGC,
January 2010
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 41 Revision 003
Surveys conducted in 20104 included sampling across transects in the MOF and LNG trestle
footprint. All benthic samples collected in the Early Landing/Trestle and MOF approach channels
yielded no seagrass or algae. These findings parallel the findings of the investigations undertaken
by DPIF on behalf of PCIMP in November 2009 (2009 PCIMP Intertidal and Coastal Monitoring
Program unpublished data). A more recent (June 2010) helicopter survey at low tide of the areas
in question also revealed no plant material in the surveyed MOF area. Seagrass habitats were
identified in the larger area during the PCIMP survey in November 2009, but as of June 2010, the
seagrass meadow located north of the MOF area is no longer present, while the seagrass
meadow to the south has retreated a further 85m offshore.
No seagrass meadows were either recorded or observed at the MOF or LNG jetty site, although
there are four seagrass meadows located in immediate surrounding area, with one located
approximately 35m to the northwest and a second located approximately 35m to the southeast,
the closest situated to the southeast of the site along the Curtis Island intertidal shoreline.
However, given the lack of seagrass cover at time of survey, and the extent of seagrass through
Port Curtis as summarised in Table 8-1, direct impacts arising from construction of the MOF and
LNG Jetty are anticipated to be minimal
Extent of seagrass at the MOF and LNG Jetty in 2009 DPIF survey are shown in Figure 6 and
Figure 7 below5.
9.2.2. Intertidal Habitat – Migratory Shorebirds
QGC commissioned Sandpiper Ecological Surveys and Wildsearch Environmental Services to
undertake baseline migratory shorebird surveys at the proposed QGC Liquefied Natural Gas
(LNG) facility at Gladstone, Queensland. The surveys were undertaken as part of the QCLNG EIS
process during October 2008, February 2009, and September 2009. Details of timing,
methodology, survey effort and results are presented in the QCLNG Migratory Shorebird
Management Plan.
4 Vision Environment, 2010. Materials Offloading Facility, Trestle & Early Landing Areas: Marine Plants Survey.
Unpublished report for QGC, June 2010
5 Figures taken from Vision Environment, 2010. Materials Offloading Facility, Trestle & Early Landing Areas:
Marine Plants Survey. Unpublished report for QGC, June 2010
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 42 Revision 003
Survey results identified small numbers of five species, Whimbrel, Far Eastern Curlew (N.
madagascariensis), Bar-tailed Godwit (Limosa lapponica), Masked Lapwing (Vanellus miles) and
Australian Pied Oystercatcher (Haematopus longirostris) were recorded foraging and/or roosting
within the LNG facility. A Beach Stone-Curlew (Esacus magnirostris) was recorded flying past the
site on one occasion. The maximum number of shorebirds recorded within the QCLNG site during
a single survey was 13 at low tide on 7 October 2008. High tide counts ranged from three to five
individuals.
Survey results indicate that the QCLNG site (including the marine facilities) does not represent an
important roost or foraging area for migratory (or resident) shorebirds. The site (including the
immediately adjacent intertidal habitat) supports a very small proportion of the migratory shorebird
population in the Curtis Coast Region (0.001%), Port Curtis (0.003%) and Upper Port Curtis
(0.01%)6. Additional low tide surveys of the QCLNG shoreline conducted in January 2011 support
the earlier findings (Sandpiper & Wildsearch unpublished).
Sandpiper and Wildsearch7 concluded that:
whilst the proposed LNG Facility (including marine facilities) may render some of the claypan
habitat unsuitable for shorebirds this would affect a very small number (i.e. between 3 and 6)
of individuals;
a substantial area of adjoining intertidal habitat will continue to be available to shorebirds at
low tide despite the presence of marine facilities;
shorebirds are likely to continue to forage within the adjoining habitat, albeit in lower numbers;
lights from the marine facilities may benefit some individuals that forage near the site at night.
Given this predicted minimal impact, no specific action to address loss of intertidal habitat for
migratory shorebirds arising from construction of marine facilities is warranted. Notwithstanding
this, actions to monitor and report shorebirds are included in the QCLNG Migratory Shorebird
Management Plan and are summarised in Section 10.12 of this marine facilities CECP.
6 Sandpiper Ecological Surveys & Wildsearch Environmental Services, 2009. QGC Queensland Curtis LNG Project,
Curtis Island: Supplementary Surveys for Powerful Owl and Migratory Shorebirds. Report prepared for ERM
Australia.
7 Sandpiper Ecological Surveys & Wildsearch Environmental Services, 2009. QGC Queensland Curtis LNG Project,
Curtis Island: Supplementary Surveys for Powerful Owl and Migratory Shorebirds. Report prepared for ERM
Australia.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 43 Revision 003
25566-100
Figu
Ele
-G01-GHX-0008
ure 5 Seagras
ectronic docum
S© Copyright Bec
86
ss at Constr
ents, once prin
Security Levechtel Oil, Gas and
ruction Dock
ted, are uncont
el 2 - Bechted Chemicals, Inc
Page
trolled and may
el Confidentiac. 2011-2012. Al
e 44
y become outdat
al ll rights reserved
ted.
d.
Revision 0033
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 45 Revision 003
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 46 Revision 003
Figure 6 Seagrass at LNG Jetty
25566-100
Ele
-G01-GHX-0008
ectronic docum
S© Copyright Bec
86
ents, once prin
Security Levechtel Oil, Gas and
ted, are uncont
el 2 - Bechted Chemicals, Inc
Page
trolled and may
el Confidentiac. 2011-2012. Al
e 47
y become outdat
al ll rights reserved
ted.
d.
Revision 0033
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 48 Revision 003
Figure 7 Seagrass at MOF
25566-100
Ele
-G01-GHX-0008
ectronic docum
S© Copyright Bec
86
ents, once prin
Security Levechtel Oil, Gas and
ted, are uncont
el 2 - Bechted Chemicals, Inc
Page
trolled and may
el Confidentiac. 2011-2012. Al
e 49
y become outdat
al ll rights reserved
ted.
d.
Revision 0033
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 50 Revision 003
9.3. Construction Noise
Impacts on marine fauna arising from construction noise, and specifically piling, were modelled for
the QCLNG SEIS. A summary is provided below.
Underwater noise models use bathymetric data, geoacoustic information and oceanographic
parameters as inputs to produce estimates of the acoustic field at any depth and distance from the
source.
Five different sources were used to assess underwater noise impacts. These include an LNG
tanker, tug boat, cutter suction dredge (CSD), and two pile-driving operations. For the purposes of
this marine facilities CECP, the key items are the pile driving and, to a lesser extent CSD. The
seabed parameters entered into the model were based on estimates obtained from core samples
and seismic surveys.
Zones of interest for the underwater noise assessment include the following:
area of possible physical injury: possibility that the animal may suffer physical injury and/or
permanent hearing damage
area of possible avoidance: possibility that the animal may experience masking and/or
behavioural change and/or avoid the area.
9.3.1. Turtles
Little is known about the source levels and associated frequencies that cause physical injury to a
turtle. For the purpose of the assessment, frequencies are based on empirically-based safety
ranges from studies which have examined the effects of explosions on turtles. The estimated
received levels at which there is a possibility of physical injury or behavioural effect for turtles is
detailed in Table 9-2 below.
In general, it is estimated that a pressure value of 222 dB re 1µPa should not be exceeded for
adult turtles to avoid physical injury. Hatchlings were evaluated using the same auditory sensory
(sound) values for fish, at 198 dB re 1µPa2s.
Table 9-2: Estimated received levels at which there is a possibility of physical injury or behavioural effect for turtles
Effect Possible physical injury Possible avoidance
Peak pressure 222 dB re 1µPa 175 dB re 1µPa
Sound level (SEL) 198 dB re 1µPa No data available
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 51 Revision 003
9.3.2. Cetaceans and Dugongs
Values which were used to assess the possibility of physical injury or behavioural effect of
underwater noise on cetaceans and dugongs are provided in Table 9-3. They are based on the
criteria recommended by Southall et al8 and the EPBC Act Policy Statement 2.19.
It is estimated that to avoid physical injury to dugongs and cetaceans a pressure value of 222 dB
re 1µPa and sound level of 198 dB re 1µPa2.s should not be exceeded.
Table 9-3: Estimated received levels at which there is a possibility of physical injury or behavioural effect for cetaceans and dugongs
Effect Possible physical injury Possible avoidance
Peak pressure 230 dB re 1µPa 224 dB re 1µPa
SEL 198 dB re 1µPa2.s 160 dB re 1µPa2.s
9.3.3. Findings
In general, results indicate that sound levels (SEL) from all sources will be below 198 dB re
1µPa2.s at 2 m below the surface. That is, the level at which possible injury to dugongs,
cetaceans, and turtles might occur. The largest sound levels will come from piling of the jetty and
the Materials Offloading Facility (MOF) and these are highlighted in the figures below.
The furthest distance from piling of the jetty and MOF to the zone of possible physical injury is
55 m for turtles and 22 m for dugongs and cetaceans (see Table 9-4). The maximum distances
between noise sources and the zone of avoidance for turtles range from 160 m to 1,500 m, while
for cetaceans and dugongs, distances range of 5 m to 205 m.
The relatively short ranges can be attributed to the fact that the jetty and MOF pile-driving activities
take place in very shallow water (approximately 5 m), which implies that only a small portion of the
pile is in the water during the pile-driving and that most of the acoustic energy is transferred into
the seabed.
8 Southall BL, Bowles AE, Ellison WT, Finneran JT, Gentry RL, Greene Jr CR, Kastak D, Ketten DR, Miller JH,
Nachtigall PE, Richardson WJ, Thomas JA and Tyack PL. (2007). Marine Mammal Noise Exposure Criteria: Initial
Scientific Recommendations Aquatic Mammals, Volume 33, Number 4, 2007, ISSN 0167-5427
9 DEWHA (2008). EPBC Act Policy Statement- Interaction between offshore seismic exploration and whales.
http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/publications/pubs/seismic-whales.pdf accessed December 2009.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 52 Revision 003
Table 9-4 summarises the maximum distances between noise sources and the zones of
avoidance and possible physical injury for turtles, cetaceans and dugongs.
Table 9-4: Furthest distance to zones of avoidance and possible physical injury
Animal class Source(s) Furthest
distance from
source to zone
of avoidance
Furthest distance
from source to
zone of possible
physical injury
Furthest distance
from source to
EPBC Act policy
level (160 dB re
1µPa2.s)
Turtles Piling at jetty 1,500 m 55 m N/A
Piling at MOF 1,200 m 55 m N/A
Cutter suction
dredge
55 m - N/A
Tug boat - - N/A
LNG tanker and
tug boat
160 m - N/A
Cetaceans and
dugongs
Piling at jetty 205 m 22 m 205 m
Piling at MOF 160 m 22 m 160 m
Cutter suction
dredge
5 m - 5 m
Tug - - -
LNG tanker and
tug
- - -
Based on these findings, mitigation measures to minimise risk of physical injury to turtles,
cetaceans and dugong as a result of noise generated during piling for the marine facilities have
been developed and are included in Section 10.12.
9.4. Lighting
Potential impacts on marine fauna arising from lighting associated with the LNG Facility, including
marine facilities on Curtis Island, were addressed in the QCLNG SEIS. A summary is provided
below.
Lighting associated with the operation of the onshore facilities and marine facilities represents a
source for potential impacts to turtles. There is no line of sight between the QCLNG Project LNG
marine facilities and turtle nesting beaches on the seaward beaches of Curtis and Facing Islands,
and therefore any impact would only accrue to feeding or transitory animals. Potential light impacts
to the local turtle population are considered to be negligible, given the disruption to a small portion
of the population. On this basis it is considered unlikely that the QCLNG Project would lead to a
significant impact on EPBC-listed turtle species found in Port Curtis. This is because of the low
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 53 Revision 003
level of disturbance likely to be caused by the Project and the distance to sensitive nesting
beaches.
The response of shorebirds (including EPBC listed migratory species) to lights is difficult to predict.
Shorebirds are likely to habituate to the presence of lights, although response will differ between
species. Migratory shorebirds are likely to inhabit the Port Curtis area during the period of
September to April. This period includes the wet season when there would be greater food
availability for shorebirds within the intertidal and wetland areas where shorebirds congregate.
Those areas in Port Curtis identified as important habitat for shorebirds are not located near the
LNG facility. Therefore, it is assumed that impacts from shielded lighting would have minimum
impacts on the identified important roosting areas. A zone of low shorebird activity is likely to exist
around each dock at night. The impact of lights on shorebirds is expected to be localised. As noted
previously, Sandpiper and Wildsearch10 have concluded that lights from the marine facilities may
benefit some individuals that forage near the site at night.
Mitigation measures to address potential lighting impacts are included in Section 10.17.
10 Sandpiper Ecological Surveys & Wildsearch Environmental Services, 2009. QGC Queensland Curtis LNG Project,
Curtis Island: Supplementary Surveys for Powerful Owl and Migratory Shorebirds. Report prepared for ERM
Australia.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 54 Revision 003
10. Site Specific Environmental Aspects
The environmental aspects addressed in this CECP include:
General Construction
Construction Noise and Vibration
Soil Erosion and Sediment Control
Management of Acid Sulphate Soils
Waste Management
Refuelling and Hazardous Substances Management
Contaminated Sites
Air Quality
Greenhouse Gas
Marine Water Quality
Weed and Pest Management
Marine Flora and Fauna
Red Imported Fire Ant
Terrestrial Flora and Fauna
Marine Pest Management
Red Imported Fire Ant
Mosquito and Biting Midge
Visual Amenity
Lighting
Traffic and Transport
Marine Traffic Management
Indigenous Cultural Heritage
Non-indigenous Cultural Heritage
Stakeholder Management
These will be implemented subject to QGC approval of the relevant scope.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 55 Revision 003
10.1. General Construction
Aspect
General construction environmental management.
Objectives
1. Manage marine construction and worksite to avoid environmental harm and potential
environmental harm on Matters of National Environmental Significance and in accordance with
the Environmental Protection Act 1994.
2. Manage marine construction and worksite in accordance with Condition of Approval for the
Construction Dock Operational Works Tidal Permit Final Conditions (DERM and DEEDI) and
the CECP.
3. Avoid or limit construction impacts to the local community.
Potential Impacts on Environmental Values
Non-compliance with Conditions of Approval may lead to environmental harm occurring or community
complaints. The Company’s reputation may also be impacted.
Control Strategy
1. Monitor compliance with the Conditions of Approval by undertaking regular audits.
2. Follow QGC’s instructions regarding community engagement strategy for the construction phase.
This is to incorporate an ongoing notification system to keep stakeholders informed about the
construction and any impacts they may experience. The strategy is also to incorporate a
complaints handling system.
Actions
1. The marine construction area will be maintained in a state that is satisfactory to the
Gladstone Ports Corporation.
2. DERM will be notified in writing by QGC, at least five days prior, of the date of
commencement of construction of the ISA and the Construction Dock, including the date of
expected completion of work.
3. Marine construction worksites are to be designed to incorporate environmental management
measures such as stormwater management features, noise attenuation and dust
minimisation. Construction worksites are to be designed to avoid unnecessary impacts to
local flora and fauna.
4. In accordance with Construction Dock OPW Tidal Permit Conditions of Approval (DERM Condition 4) rock, stone, gravel or other material used in backfilling of the bulkhead wall will be: Suitable for the purpose of having regard to the location of the land and to the
proposed use of the land; and
Free from contaminants as much as practical.
5. In accordance with Construction Dock OPW Tidal Permit Conditions of Approval (DERM Condition 5) rock, stone, gravel or other material will be managed within the construction footprint area.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 56 Revision 003
6. Construction vehicle access is to occur on a sealed, watered or stabilised roadway to
minimise dust generation.
7. Construction activities are to be undertaken in accordance with the Job Hazard Analysis
(JHA) which is to incorporate environmental management measures for each construction
activity.
8. Marine plant equipment will comply with the “Standards for Marine Construction activities
within Gladstone Harbour” as amended from time to time and available on the Maritime
Safety Queensland website.
9. Temporary works associated with the construction of the works are to be removed from the
site at the completion of works.
10. Shipping activity associated with construction and operation of the marine facilities will be
undertaken in accordance with the QCLNG Shipping Activity Management Plan (Bechtel
document 25566-500-GCI-GCX-0003).
Performance Indicators
1. No enforcement action undertaken by DERM or Council.
2. Construction activities are carried out in a manner that does not contravene the CECP.
3. Site inspections have been completed at the required frequency by appropriate personnel
and records of inspection maintained.
4. Any actions raised during site inspections are to be closed as soon as reasonably possible.
5. Corrective actions were taken to address non-compliances.
6. Monitoring has been carried out in accordance with the Conditions of Approval and as
required under the CECP. The results of monitoring required by Conditions of Approval are
recorded and reported to the administering authority when requested.
7. Community complaints handled in accordance with the system adopted for the QCLNG
Project, complaints are promptly attended to and closed out.
Monitoring
1. Regular weekly inspections of the construction worksite to determine compliance with the
above.
Reporting
1. Environmental checklist completed and submitted to Environmental Manager for review.
Defects identified during these inspections are added to the sites Corrective Action Register.
2. Any environmental incidents or complaints are reported within 24 hours of receipt / reporting
to the contractor HSSE manager, GPC and other agencies as appropriate.
Corrective Action
1. Any actions raised during site inspections are to be closed as soon as possible. The
construction worksite layouts are to be reviewed by an environmental professional before
work commences.
Training
1. Site Specific Induction.
2. Personnel are to be familiar with the GPC Environmental Policy which will be available on
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 57 Revision 003
site at all times.
10.2. Construction Noise and Vibration
Aspect
A potential exists for construction noise and vibration to impact on neighbouring projects, personnel
and the surrounding environment. Due to tidal conditions, works may be executed at times which fall
outside of normal daylight hours; however, there are no nearby residential receptors to be adversely
impacted from activities at night.
Objectives
The key objectives are:
1. To prevent noise and vibration nuisance from construction activities.
2. Maintain a reasonable acoustic environment for living, in particular for sleeping, and use of
properties during construction works.
Potential Impacts on Environmental Values
Noise impacts to sensitive places or commercial places may cause environmental nuisance as
described in the Environmental Protection Act 1994.
(note that noise and vibration impacts on marine fauna are addressed in Section 10.12 Marine Flora
and Fauna)
Control Strategy
When construction will involve the use of heavy equipment and noise and vibration generating
activities, these activities will be prevented as much as practicable from being a nuisance to the
site’s personnel and neighbours in accordance with the Environmental Protection Regulation 2008
and Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2008.
Prevent noise becoming a safety issue to personnel on site in accordance with the Workplace
Health and Safety Act 1995.
Actions
1. Advise personnel at induction and at subsequent tool box meetings of requirements in
regard to limiting use of audible signals, unnecessary revving of engines, unnecessary
engine braking and generally exercising due courtesy to local residents and fellow workers.
2. Adjacent landholders and GRC will be advised of any atypical noise events 7 days prior to
commencement of the activities.
3. Adjacent landholders and GRC will be advised of any excessive noise-generating activities
which are planned to occur during evening or night time hours (between 1800 and 0600
hours); 7 days prior to commencement of the activities.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 58 Revision 003
4. Noise monitoring will be undertaken when requested by the administering authority to
investigate a complaint.
5. Equipment used on site will be maintained to limit noise and vibration impact.
6. Engines will be turned off when not in use.
7. Limit the height from which the material is dropped into the truck when loading rock and
other materials into trucks.
8. Locate generators, compressors and other noise generating equipment away from offices
and work areas.
9. Provide appropriate hearing protection to affected workers if noise levels exceed the 85
dB(A) limit for protection of worker’s health.
10. Maintain awareness of construction workers in relation to minimising noise impacts from
equipment operation.
Performance Indicators
1. Noise and vibration not to cause an environmental nuisance at nearby sensitive or
commercial places.
2. No noise or vibration complaints from neighbouring properties.
3. Noise and vibration levels meet limits specified in Environmental Protection Regulation 2008
and Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2008.
Monitoring
1. When requested by the administering authority, noise monitoring will be undertaken within a
reasonable and practicable timeframe to investigate any complaint related to noise.
2. The method of measurement and reporting of noise levels will comply with the latest edition
of the DERM Noise Measurement Manual.
3. Operators shall undertake daily pre-start checks to verify equipment is in operating
condition.
4. Records of plant maintenance will be maintained by the equipment owners.
5. Complaints will be referred to QGC for follow-up and resolution.
Reporting
1. Records of any noise and vibration monitoring shall be retained for the duration of the
construction activities and five (5) years after completion of works.
2. Complaints will be referred to QGC for follow-up and resolution.
Corrective Action
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 59 Revision 003
1. Identify the source of the noise or vibration and cease that activity until the source has been
altered or noise abatement measures instigated.
2. Where possible, schedule operations so that noisy equipment is used separately, rather
than concurrently.
3. Complaints shall be managed by QGC. Mitigations will be implemented as directed by
QGC.
4. Direct that work practices be modified as necessary to reduce the duration and/or level of
noise or vibration.
Training
1. Site Specific Induction
2. Toolbox Talk – Noise
3. Toolbox Talk – Vibration
4. Toolbox Talk – Complaint Management
10.3. Soil Erosion and Sediment Control
Aspect
Erosion, sedimentation and displacement of stockpiled material, cleared areas and waterways.
Objectives
To provide effective erosion and sediment control measures to mitigate the potential effects of
construction on local waterways, land use and the general environment.
The key objectives are:
1. To prevent sedimentation leaving the construction site.
2. To prevent the erosion of the construction area.
3. To prevent sediment-laden water entering stormwater or nearby waterways.
Potential Impacts on Environmental Values
Sediment laden run-off may enter nearby receiving waters during construction.
Natural waterways and flow paths may be reduced due to the construction of the marine facilities.
Control Strategy
1. The disturbance of bed and banks surrounding the construction site will be kept to a minimum.
2. A Sediment and Erosion Control Plan is to be developed and submitted to relevant agencies
prior to commencement of construction.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 60 Revision 003
3. Stage excavation activities in a manner to limit areas exposed and therefore vulnerable to erosion
and sedimentation.
4. Erosion and sediment control structures (e.g. sediment fencing around exposed areas and
material stockpiles, shake down grids / rubble at unsealed egress points) will be installed to limit
erosion of disturbed areas and prevent the contamination of waterways.
5. Upstream run-off will be diverted around areas disturbed by construction activities or where
contaminants or wastes are stored or handled that may contaminant stormwater.
6. Measures for the collection, treatment and disposal of contaminated stormwater and drainage
from construction worksites and stockpile placement sites.
7. Erosion and sediment control structures will be regularly inspected and maintained, particularly
prior to and following heavy rainfall events.
Actions
1. Implement project plans 25566-100-G01-GHX-00079 “Storm Water Quality Management Plan
– Early Works” and 25566-100-G01-GHX-00080 “Soil Erosion and Sedimentation
Management Plan – Early Works”.
Performance Indicators
1. Refer to project plans 25566-100-G01-GHX-00079 “Storm Water Quality Management Plan –
Early Works” and 25566-100-G01-GHX-00080 “Soil Erosion and Sedimentation
Monitoring
1. As per project plans 25566-100-G01-GHX-00079 “Storm Water Quality Management Plan –
Early Works” and 25566-100-G01-GHX-00080 “Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Management
Plan – Early Works”.
Reporting
1. As per project plans 25566-100-G01-GHX-00079 “Storm Water Quality Management Plan –
Early Works” and 25566-100-G01-GHX-00080 “Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Management
Plan – Early Works”.
Corrective Action
1. As per project plans 25566-100-G01-GHX-00079 “Storm Water Quality Management Plan –
Early Works” and 25566-100-G01-GHX-00080 “Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Management
Plan – Early Works”.
2. Remove deposited material from roadways.
3. Review corrective action implementation for effectiveness.
4. Provide additional training to personnel where required.
Training
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 61 Revision 003
1. Site Specific Induction
2. Toolbox Talk – Erosion and Sedimentation Control
10.4. Management of Acid Sulphate Soils
Aspect
During construction Actual Acid Sulphate Soils (AASS) and Potential Acid Sulphate Soils (PASS)
may potentially be encountered.
Objectives
Manage the environmental or public health impacts associated with working in actual or potential acid
sulphate soils encountered during earthworks.
The key objectives are:
Acid sulphate soils are not disturbed or excavated unnecessarily.
No PASS fill material will be incorporated into the fill until monitoring tests indicate that
actionable levels of oxidisable sulphur are below Queensland Acid Sulphate Soils Investigation
Team (QASSIT) guidelines.
No physical evidence in the works of acid sulphate soils on site such as yellow efflorescence on
soil surface, iron staining of soils or water, sulphurous odour or low water pH.
Contaminants are not directly released as a result of construction activities to any waters or the
bed and banks of any waters.
Control Strategy
Reasonable and practicable control measures will be implemented to limit disturbance and manage
AASS/PASS where required.
As required in the Construction Dock OPW Tidal Permit Conditions of Approval (DERM Condition 11)
work will be carried out in accordance with an Acid Sulphate Soil Management Plan (ASSMP)
approved by DERM, implemented over the full period of construction and for a period after completion
of construction as defined in the ASSMP.
Management of ASS and PASS for the MOF will undertaken in accordance with three connected
ASSMPs,
Material Offloading Facility Acid Sulfate Soils Management Plan prepared by Coffey
Geotechnics Pty Ltd, retained by Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemical Inc. (Component Zone 1);
QCLNG Material Offloading Facility (MOF): Intertidal/Mangrove Zone, Curtis Island,
Queensland prepared by GeoCoastal Group, retained by QCLNG Operating Company Pty Ltd
(Component Zone 2); and
A further ASSMP for the seaward portion (Component Zone 3), to be associated with the
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 62 Revision 003
Dredge Management Plan (not directly applicable to the marine facilities construction covered
by this CECP)
Actions
1. Where required, PASS disturbance shall be limited.
2. Construction works will comply with management measures outlined in the QCLNG Acid
Sulphate Soil Management Plan.
3. PASS shall be neutralised in a timely manner following dry excavation.
4. Measures shall be implemented to contain and treat leachate.
5. Incorporate knowledge of location of PASS/AASS into earthworks program.
6. ASS will be managed in accordance with the ‘Queensland Acid Sulphate Soil Technical
Manual, Soil Management Guidelines 2002’.
7. Neutralisation of PASS using incorporation and mixing of agricultural lime at rates
determined from testing of materials at time of placement.
8. Material excavated from the PASS/ASS areas shall be tested in accordance with the
QASSIT Guidelines to confirm the presence of ASS. Material deemed to contain PASS
shall be neutralised with lime and disposed of as per the DERM approved plan. Where
approved, PASS will be reburied within 12 hours below Mean Low Water Springs (MLWS).
9. Environmental Manager shall be notified immediately if suspected ASS are encountered.
10. Management of ASS is to be confirmed by Environmental Manager following completion of
acid sulphate soil testing.
11. Personnel will be advised at induction of ways to identify ASS.
12. Soils validated as neutral may be used as reclamation fill on site.
13. Excavated PASS or AASS shall be spread in layers of 300mm loose and each layer shall be
limited at the calculated rate. Soils will require drying and must be worked several times to
guarantee thorough mixing of lime. Mixing shall be performed by disc plough, rotary hoe or
equivalent.
14. Limit treatment of ASS during foreseeable or extended periods of wet weather.
15. Net acidity levels should remain constant or negative if treatment is undertaken of PASS
16. pH must remain within QASSIT guidelines for existing PASS (6.5-9.0)
17. Runoff pH should remain within QASSIT guidelines (6.5-9.0)
Performance Indicators
1. Acid sulphate soils are not disturbed or excavated unnecessarily.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 63 Revision 003
2. Contaminants are not directly or indirectly released as a result of construction activities to
any waters or the bed and banks of any waters.
Monitoring
1. Monitoring for ASS will occur in areas of ASS disturbance as specified in the QCLNG ASS
Management Plan.
2. Material excavated from PASS/ASS areas shall be tested in accordance with the QASSIT
Guidelines to confirm presence / absence of ASS.
3. Any reburial of PASS must occur within 12 hours of exposure and below MLWS.
4. Results shall be reviewed upon receipt of the results to detect any unforseen changes to
PASS/Net Neutralising PASS testing or treatment areas
5. Validation sampling will be conducted following remediation or covering of contaminated soil
and sign-off will be obtained from a qualified/certified auditor.
6. Records of monitoring results shall be maintained and available upon request.
Reporting
1. Field screening and sampling results must be updated as taken and reviewed, available in a
suitable format for inspections by the DERM.
Corrective Action
1. If acid sulphate soil levels exceed QASSIT levels, re-treat with Aglime and re-test.
2. If Net Neutralising PASS is unexpectedly located, lab test and lime as advised.
Training
1. Site Specific Induction
2. Environmental Awareness Training – Acid Sulphate Soils Module
3. Toolbox Talk – Acid Sulphate Soil Impacts
10.5. Waste Management
Aspect
A potential exists for environmental harm from incorrect waste management as follows:
Solid and liquid construction waste and organic wastes may detract from the amenity of the
area and have the potential to contaminate land and waterways.
Many of the waste products associated with maintenance activities are classified as Regulated
Waste under the Environmental Protection Act 1994 and must be disposed of in the appropriate
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 64 Revision 003
manner.
Objectives
1. To comply with the CECP, the Waste Management Plan, Construction Dock and MOF OPW Tidal
Permit Conditions of Approval (DERM Conditions) and relevant legislation.
2. To implement waste management principles (Reduce, Re-use, Recycle) and effective disposal
strategies.
3. Maintain the aesthetic appeal of the area and the habitat of the surrounding environment by
proper handling and disposal of wastes.
4. Identify and correctly dispose of those waste products identified as ‘Regulated Wastes’ under
Schedule 7 of the Environmental Protection Regulation 2008.
5. Implement Waste Tracking Procedures for those waste products identified as ‘Trackable Waste’
under Schedule 1 of the Environmental Protection (Waste Management) Regulation 2000.
6. Prevent mixing of waste streams.
Potential Impacts on Environmental Values
Incorrectly handled wastes could cause environmental harm and contamination. Waste disposal
increases the burden on landfill.
Control Strategy
1. Manage waste in accordance with the Waste Management Plan, the Conditions of Approval and
relevant legislation.
2. All waste removed from the site to be removed by a person who holds a current authority to
transport such wastes.
3. Regulated waste will not be disposed of on site.
4. Educate the workforce to familiarise them with waste types and management practices.
Actions
1. A Waste Management Plan for the activities on site will be prepared and implemented.
2. Construction will comply with the management measures outlined in the Waste Management
Program.
3. Procure the correct quantities for materials for construction works to limit waste and excess
materials.
4. In accordance with the Construction Dock OPW Tidal Permit Conditions of Approval (DERM
Condition 10) waste generated by construction activities will be collected and disposed of at a
facility that is permitted to accept such waste.
5. A waste-minimisation program will assess opportunities for reduction at source, reuse and
recycling as well as recovery of materials or conversion of waste into useable materials.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 65 Revision 003
6. Where possible, waste containers used at the construction site will be labelled to help assist in
the segregation efforts onsite.
7. Source re-use options on site for waste materials, e.g. re-use waste concrete to stabilise site
accesses, re-use timber formwork, re-use steel off-cuts where possible.
8. Personnel shall undergo a site specific induction that includes waste management practices
and applicable legislative requirements.
9. Hazardous waste material generated will be segregated from other waste streams, clearly
labelled and appropriately stored.
10. Hazardous liquid wastes awaiting disposal, such as hydrocarbons and oils, shall be stored
appropriately in accordance with AS1940:2004 ‘The Storage and Handling of Flammable and
Combustible Liquids’.
11. Waste oil will be kept in bunded area and removed for recycling by an appropriately licensed
contractor.
12. Dispose of wastes frequently to reduce on-site accumulation.
13. Wastes will be segregated for recycling purposes to the level that is available within local
government areas and by local contractors
14. Food wastes shall be removed from site at the earliest convenience to control vermin and
odour. Food wastes shall be stored in bins that have lids to exclude wildlife and water. Open
skips are not recommended.
15. Waste generated by site will be recorded in a waste register with the following information:
Date removed from site
Waste type
Quantity (Litres or m3)
Origin
Destination
Final fate, (e.g. recycled, burial etc)
Reference number of waste transport certificate
16. Waste tracking certificates (DERM approved 5 docket system) shall accompany trackable
regulated wastes.
17. Green waste should be reused on site wherever possible.
18. Overall standard housekeeping will be employed so that rubbish and waste is suitably
contained on site until disposal and is prevented from escaping into bushland, creeks,
stormwater, and/or onto neighbouring properties.
19. On the completion of works the site shall be cleared of all rubbish and waste be left in a clean
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 66 Revision 003
and tidy condition.
20. If required, concrete wash water from agitator trucks or concrete pumping equipment is to be
washed out into a designated area on site.
Performance Indicators
1. No contamination of soil, water or air as a result of inappropriate waste management.
2. Reuse and recycling wastes on site where practically possible.
3. Minimal odour or vermin issues including polluted water runoff into surface waters.
4. The handling and transporting of dangerous goods occurs in accordance with the relevant
Australian Standards.
5. Waste management practices do not result in degradation of health to personnel or
sensitive receptors.
Monitoring
1. Regular weekly inspection of the waste handling facilities to verify waste has been
appropriately segregated
2. Receptacles shall be checked to verify correct types of waste are being deposited in each
relevant receptacle.
3. Compliance with the Waste Management Plan will be audited regularly.
4. Maintained site waste register.
5. Regular 6-monthly audits of onsite waste disposal and recycling facilities.
Reporting
1. Waste register to be maintained and updated.
2. Non-Compliance and Incident Reporting will be done and closed out by Environmental
Manager.
3. Waste tracking documentation will be recorded and sent to the DERM within 7 days of
disposal of waste. Green or yellow copies will be stored in the site files with the waste
register.
4. Waste handling procedures will be reviewed as required to mitigate waste management
issues or transgressions.
Corrective Action
1. Re-train personnel and replace bins as necessary if rubbish becomes contaminated.
2. Amend waste management plan if required.
Training
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 67 Revision 003
1. Site Specific Induction
2. Environmental Awareness Training – Waste Management module
3. Toolbox Talk – Waste Management
4. Toolbox Talk – Waste Tracking
5. Toolbox Talk – Recycling and Reuse
10.6. Refuelling and Hazardous Substances Management
Aspect
A potential exists for fuel, oil, chemicals and other potentially hazardous materials may leak or be
spilled contaminating surrounding land and water. Contaminated soils are considered ‘Regulated’
under the Environmental Protection Act 1994.
Objectives
To limit potential construction hazards and risks for construction workers and limit the potential for
environmental harm from construction activities.
The key objectives are:
1. Prevent contamination of land or water on or around the site.
2. Spills of fuel and oil are contained and cleaned up so that no environmental harm occurs.
Potential Impacts on Environmental Values
Incorrect storage and handling of hazardous chemicals, corrosive substances, toxic substances,
gases, dangerous goods, and flammable and combustible liquids handled wastes has the potential to
cause environmental harm and contamination.
Note that potential impacts arising from marine fuel and oil spills, and management and mitigation
measures, are addressed separately in the QCLNG Project Construction Environmental Control Plan
– Marine Fuel and Oil Spill Management Plan
Control Strategy
1. The construction site is appropriately managed in accordance with the Workplace Health and
Safety Act 1995.
2. Fuel and chemical handling and storage will comply with Australian Standards including, AS1940:
Storage and Handling of Flammable and Combustible Liquids, and AS3780: The Storage and
Handling of Corrosive Substances.
3. Storage tanks will be bunded so that capacity is sufficient to contain at least 110% of a single
storage tank or 100% of the largest storage tank plus 10% of the second largest storage tank in
multiple storage areas.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 68 Revision 003
4. Drum storages will be bunded so that the capacity is sufficient to contain at least 25% of the
maximum design storage volume.
5. Develop emergency response procedures, and implement in the event of accidents and
emergencies.
6. Provide fire and life safety measures, including ventilation, smoke extraction and fire fighting
systems for the duration of the construction phase.
7. Relevant spill equipment is available and in located in easily accessible areas, including refuelling
vehicles.
8. Relevant plant, including marine vessels, will be equipped with adequate spill response equipment.
9. Personnel are trained to use spill equipment and familiar with disposal requirements.
Actions
1. Develop and implement safety measures for the construction works including strategies that
address flood, fire and chemical hazard, communications, access for emergency services,
response coordination and management.
2. Develop and implement a communication with the Department of Community Safety in relation
to emergency procedures.
3. Where possible, minimum quantities of hazardous substances necessary for construction will
be maintained.
4. Report any toxic, infective or hazardous contaminants that are uncovered during the works.
5. Personnel shall receive induction training pertaining to storage and handling procedures, spill
response and environmental incident reporting procedures.
6. Refuelling equipment shall be by manual operation.
7. Fuelling and maintenance of vehicles and equipment shall comply with the relevant regulations
and standards and it shall be undertaken at locations away from drainage systems.
Precautions shall be in place to verify accidental spills do not escape into surface waters. Such
precautions may include fitting equipment with Banlaw Dry-Break (or equivalent) fuel nozzles,
use of absorbent material to soak up excess oil and use of drip trays.
8. Signage shall be displayed in accordance with DGSM Regulation requirements.
9. Storage of fuel, oil and degreasers shall be contained within impervious bunded areas and
comply with AS1940 ‘The Storage and Handling of Flammable and Combustible Liquids’.
10. Storage of corrosive substances shall be in accordance with AS3780 “The Storage and
Handling of Corrosive Substances”.
11. Incompatible chemicals, gases and hazardous substances will be segregated or separated
where required.
12. Smoking will be confined to designated areas.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 69 Revision 003
13. Servicing of plant will be performed in designated areas or offsite in the instance of major
works, where any potential spills can be contained.
14. Spill response kits will be placed at designated locations nearby to high risk activities. High risk
activities include locations where liquid hazardous materials are stored, where refuelling and
equipment maintenance are taking place (e.g. spill kits, absorbent pads, absorbent material,
booms etc). The spill response kits shall be suitable for oil/fuel spills to both land and water.
15. Impervious surfacing or drip trays will be used under stationary plant and equipment as
required during emergency maintenance.
16. Sand bags are to be in place at all times in front of the barge scuppers.
17. Material Safety Data Sheets shall be maintained on site.
18. In the event of a spill to water following actions will be undertaken:
Identify source of spill/leak and shut down immediately where safe to do so.
Notify Environmental Officer / Supervisor immediately.
Immediately inform the GPC, relevant environmental agencies and any other crew or ships
in the immediate vicinity of the spill in accordance with SOPEP.
Use absorbent booms and skimmers in spill response kit to soak up as much of the spill as
possible
Continue to soak up or skim fuel from water body until no visible slick
Remove booms on the outgoing tide once clearance / approval has been received from
GPC and DERM.
Check for any injury or mortality to fish and monitor for signs of environmental harm.
19. Spill response equipment that has been used in spill response shall be disposed of in
appropriate regulated waste bins or in accordance with the Waste Management Program.
20. Refuelling procedure over water:
Refuelling shall only be undertaken over water in calm conditions.
Fuel pods are self-bunded.
Drip trays/absorbent pads are to be placed beneath hose and nozzle prior to fuelling
activities to capture spills.
Spill kit materials and marine booms are on hand and contain the necessary items.
Filling points are located over a solid surface (e.g. deck), not directly over the water.
Place nozzle in tank and commence filling (do not commence filling until nozzle is placed in
tank).
Monitor filling and cease before tank overflows.
Inspect in and around plant and machinery after refuelling has ceased and immediately
clean up any drips or spills. Immediately report any spillages to water.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 70 Revision 003
The use of mobile phones, radios or other sources of ignition are not permitted during
refuelling operations.
A copy of SOPEP shall be communicated to all marine based personnel and maintained on
the water vessel at all times.
Performance Indicators
1. No contamination of land or water on or around the site.
2. Chemicals and fuels, including any spillage, is contained within an onsite containment
system and controlled in a manner that prevents harm to the environment.
3. Safe environment maintained for construction workers.
4. Limit construction hazards and risks for construction workers.
5. Correct disposal of contaminated products and recording of incidents.
6. Reduction of spill volumes and frequencies.
7. Effective and efficient clean-up of spills.
Monitoring
1. Regular visual inspections and job observations of refuelling on barge and of storage
facilities.
2. Regular weekly inspection of spill kits and re-stock when required.
3. All incidents shall be logged, investigated and actioned in accordance with project procedure.
Reporting
1. Spills to be recorded and entered into the Incident Log.
2. Waste transport certificates dockets shall be included on the waste register including
reference to docket number, quantity of waste etc.
Corrective Action
1. In the event of a spill to land or water the approved site Emergency Response Plan(s) will be
followed.
2. Identify cause of contamination, clean up in accordance with local government regulations and
take preventative action to limit a re-occurrence.
3. Large quantities of contaminated soil shall be removed from the spill site and transported in
accordance with local government regulations and the Waste Management Procedures for final
disposition.
4. An incident report shall be completed for any chemical, fuel or oil spills to water, and logged
into the Site Spill Register. A MSQ Marine Incident Report will be submitted to the relevant
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 71 Revision 003
authority by QGC.
5. The Barge Master shall be notified of all spills to water in accordance with SOPEP.
6. Restock any used items from spill kit.
7. Oil/hydrocarbon contaminated materials will be disposed of appropriately.
8. Contaminated soil shall be removed from the spill site and disposed of in accordance with
Waste Management Procedures for this site.
9. Leaking containers shall be placed on spill trays.
10. Emergency Contacts:
Regional Harbour Master (Gladstone) Phone (07) 4973 1200
Marine Unit Coordinator for GPC Phone (07) 4973 1208
DERM Pollution Hotline Phone 1300 130 372
QPWS Phone 1300 130 372
DPI&F Phone 13 25 23
Training
1. Site Specific Induction
2. Environmental Awareness Training – Hazardous Substances Management and Spill Response
Modules.
3. Spill response and the application of spill response material.
10.7. Air Quality
Aspect
Potential exists for air and dust nuisance to project personnel and the surrounding environment.
Objectives
1. Ambient air quality is maintained on the worksite, at nearby properties and in the surrounding
area throughout the construction period.
2. Community concerns and complaints about air quality are addressed quickly and effectively.
Potential Impacts on Environmental Values
Air quality impacts may cause an environmental nuisance, community complaints; excessive levels
of dust may also pose a health concern.
Control Strategy
Practicable control measures will be undertaken to reduce air pollution and to prevent airborne
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 72 Revision 003
contaminants created by the work from affecting the site’s personnel and nearby properties in
accordance with the Environmental Protection Regulation 2008 and Environmental Protection (Air)
Policy 2008.
Actions
1. Regular watering of the construction site and access roads. Watering frequency will be
increased during periods of high risk (e.g. high winds).
2. Avoiding or minimising dust generating activities (e.g. stripping, excavation) during high risk
times such as dry and windy conditions.
3. Promptly removing and disposing of materials, mud or the like spilled onto the road surface
which may cause a dust nuisance.
4. Surface sealing (with gravel or other material) of internal roads.
5. Restricting the movement of heavy vehicles to designated and restricted roads wherever
practicable.
6. Limiting the speed of vehicular traffic on unsealed roads.
7. A wheel shake down pad will be installed where necessary.
8. Take measures to limit dust-creating material (earth or similar material) is not transported
from construction sites to roads or other areas in the public domain.
9. Vehicles carrying bulk materials that could cause air pollution will be covered prior to leaving
site.
10. Encouraging reduction in engine idling during on and off-loading activities: trucks and heavy
equipment will not idle for extended periods (e.g. longer than five minutes).
11. As necessary, in high-traffic laydown areas, geotextile, stone or other means to stabilise the
area will be utilised to reduce dust.
12. Re-vegetation works, if required, and as authorised by QGC to be undertaken in a timely
manner.
13. Stockpile maximum height will be a function of safety, the angle of repose, and the
available area to store the material and most importantly, the equipment which is used
to create and manipulate the pile.
Performance Indicators
1. No excessive dust emissions.
2. Minimal complaints relating to air quality from surrounding areas.
3. Visible dust clouds are limited.
Monitoring
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 73 Revision 003
1. Visual monitoring of dust emissions will be conducted and watering frequency altered as
required.
2. The area of construction and associated access areas will be regularly inspected to assess
the effectiveness of dust mitigation measures.
3. When requested by the administering authority, air quality monitoring will be undertaken
within a reasonable and practicable timeframe to investigate any complaint related to air
quality.
4. Records of plant maintenance will be kept.
Reporting
1. Incident Reports will be prepared by Environmental Manager.
2. Complaints will be directed to QGC for follow-up and resolution.
Corrective Action
1. Locate the source of the airborne contaminant (dust) problem and improve control
mechanisms.
2. Non- Compliance and Incident Reporting will be investigated and closed out by Environment
Manager.
3. Locate the source of the dust problem and cover or water the exposed areas.
Training
1. Site Specific Induction
2. Environmental Awareness Training Package – Air Pollution Module.
3. Toolbox Talk – Dust Monitoring
4. Toolbox Talk – QGC’s Complaint Management Process
10.8. Greenhouse Gas
Aspect
Emission of greenhouse gases into the air from fuel usage.
Objectives
Keep emissions from plant and equipment as low as practically possible.
Control Strategy
Practicable control measures will be undertaken to reduce air pollution and to prevent air borne
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 74 Revision 003
contaminants created by the work from affecting the site’s personnel and neighbours, including any
adjacent bushland, in accordance with the Environmental Protection Regulation 2008 and
Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008.
Actions
1. Schedule deliveries of construction materials and/or disposal of waste materials to limit the
length and number of trips required, by ensuring full loads and sourcing materials locally
where practicable.
2. Vehicles, plants and equipment will be maintained and operated according to
manufacturer’s instructions.
3. Limiting travel to necessary trips.
4. Enforcing speed limits.
5. Turn off vehicles, plant and equipment rather than allowing to idle when not required.
Performance Indicators
1. No visible emissions from construction equipment (clouds of smoke).
Monitoring
1. Visual inspections will be undertaken to verify that air borne contamination mitigation
measures are appropriate to weather conditions and work being undertaken at the time.
Reporting
1. Records of fuel use will be maintained onsite.
Corrective Action
1. Locate the source of the air borne contaminant problem and improve control mechanisms.
2. Complaints will be directed to QGC for follow-up and resolution.
Training
1. Site Specific Induction.
2. Toolbox Talk – Greenhouse Gas Emissions
3. Toolbox Talk – Complaint Management
10.9. Marine Water Quality
Aspect
A potential exists for the contamination of marine surface waters as follows;
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 75 Revision 003
Spills or leaks during fuelling and maintenance of vehicles and equipment or leakage from
hydrocarbon storage areas may contaminate the surrounding surface waters.
Surface water runoff and discharge waters may enter the surrounding surface waters.
Sewerage facilities may lead to water pollution and odour nuisance.
Objectives
1. Superintendent shall implement adequate control measures to prevent the construction work from
adversely impacting on the water quality of natural drainage systems and stormwater. Such control
measures shall be in accordance with the Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 2009.
2. No discharge of sediment or oil and grease to waterways from site.
3. Uncontrolled discharge of sewage does not occur.
4. Protect the visual amenity of the wider Project area for recreational users.
Potential Impact to Environmental Values
1. Sediment laden run-off may enter nearby receiving waters during construction.
2. Hydrocarbon run-off may occur if spills are not adequately contained and construction equipment is
not maintained.
3. Natural waterways and flow paths may be reduced due to the construction activities.
Control Strategy
1. Monitor water quality prior to any discharges from stormwater detention basins where installed.
2. Construction activities will be undertaken in compliance with the Conditions of Approval and the
CECP.
3. Water quality complies with stormwater release limits outlined in the Stormwater Management
Plan.
4. Limit potential sources or pathways for contaminants to enter surrounding waters.
5. Suitable plant and equipment are used during construction to limit turbidity in tidal waters.
Actions
1. Install control measures such as contours and shallow diversion channels to prevent, as far
as practicable, large amounts of stormwater eroding banks and sediment entering the marine
environment.
2. Where possible, clear runoff from undisturbed areas shall be directed around the disturbed
areas.
3. In accordance with the Construction Dock OPW Tidal Permit Conditions of Approval (DERM
Condition 3 and 4) rock, stone, gravel or other material used in the backfilling of the bulkhead
wall will be:
a. suitable for the purpose having regard to the location of the land and to the proposed
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 76 Revision 003
use of the land; and
b. free from contaminants, as much as practicable.
All rock, stone, gravel or other material shall be managed within the construction footprint area.
4. Following major rainfall events, the performance of erosion and sediment control devices and
the quality of water runoff leaving the site will be inspected.
5. As required, runoff shall be contained within controlled detention systems, prior to discharge.
6. Storage of fuel, oil and degreasers shall comply with AS1940 ‘The Storage and Handling of
Flammable and Combustible Liquids’.
7. Storage of corrosive substances shall be in accordance with AS3780 “The Storage and
Handling of Corrosive Substances”.
8. Fuelling and maintenance of vehicles and equipment shall comply with the relevant
regulations and standards and it shall be undertaken at locations away from drainage
systems.
9. Spill response kits will be placed at designated locations nearby to high risk activities. High risk
activities include locations where liquid hazardous materials are stored, where refuelling and
equipment maintenance are taking place (e.g. spill kits, absorbent pads, absorbent material,
booms etc). The spill response kits shall be suitable for oil/fuel spills to both land and water.
10. In the event of a spill to water following actions will be undertaken:
Identify source of spill/leak and shut down immediately where safe to do so.
Notify Supervisor immediately.
Immediately inform the GPC, relevant environmental agencies and any other crew or ships
in the immediate vicinity of the spill in accordance with SOPEP.
Use absorbent booms and skimmers in spill response kit to soak up as much of the spill as
possible
Continue to soak up or skim fuel from water body until no visible slick
Remove booms on the outgoing tide once clearance / approval has been received from
GPC and DERM.
Check for any injury or mortality to fish and monitor for signs of environmental harm.
11. Water which is contaminated by fuels, oil, chemicals or hazardous waste shall not be
discharged into surrounding marine waters. Such liquids shall be cleaned up using spill
response materials and placed in drums and disposed of in accordance with Local Authority
and Government regulations.
12. QGC to notify GPC, DERM, and/or Gladstone Regional Council where the incident is of the
nature that requires notification under the Environmental Protection Act 1994 and associated
policies (i.e. material or serious environmental harm).
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 77 Revision 003
13. Concrete trucks are to be washed in designated, lined and contained wash out areas.
14. Major services of equipment will be performed off site where practically possible.
Performance Indicators
1. No discharge of sediment or oil and grease to waterways from site.
2. No visible evidence (i.e. sediment plumes or oily sheens) of water quality impacts as a result
of marine construction activities.
3. Compliance with Queensland Water Quality Guidelines prior to any discharge into
surrounding surface waters.
Monitoring
1. Water quality monitoring and sampling shall be undertaken, if required, following a major
incident (e.g. spill/leak of hydrocarbons to sensitive marine environment or release of
contaminated waters) to monitor any changes to water quality that can be attributed to
construction impacts.
2. Visual inspections or work areas to verify spills/leaks are rectified and cleaned promptly.
3. Visual inspections to verify that appropriate control measures are in place to suit the
construction activities taking place at the time.
4. Incidents shall be logged in the Environmental Incident Register, investigated and actioned in
accordance with the Incident Reporting Procedure.
Reporting
1. Incidents shall be logged in the Environmental Incident Register, investigated and actioned in
accordance with the Incident Reporting Procedure.
Corrective Action
1. If oil or grease is detected the source shall be identified and equipment fixed. Where feasible
the oil or grease shall be captured and placed in drums on the barge for removal from site in
accordance with GPC requirements or Local Environmental Authority Regulations.
2. Provide additional training to personnel where required.
3. If pH levels are out of desired range, chemical treatment with lime, bicarbonate, CO2 or other
means will be utilised to maintain a range of 6.5 to 8.5.
Training
1. Site Specific Induction
2. Toolbox Talk – Water Quality Monitoring
3. Spill response and the application of spill response material.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 78 Revision 003
10.10. Weed and Pest Management
Aspect
Clearing of native vegetation and disruption to surrounding areas may increase the threat of weed
infestation from declared weeds already existing on or surrounding the site and other noxious
weeds may be introduced to the area.
Objectives
To prevent the spread or introduction of pest and weed species as a result of construction activities.
Potential Impacts on Environmental Values
Potential for environmental harm as a result of pest infestation.
Control Strategy
1. Limit the possibility of declared weed growth on site by reducing clearing of native vegetation
where possible.
2. Control the introduction of declared weeds by reducing possible sources of weed seeds
potentially introduced to site.
Actions
1. Implement project plan 25566-100-G01-GHX-00047 “Weed, Pest and Quarantine
Management Plan”
Performance Indicators
1. Reduction in weed species occurring on site.
2. No spreading of existing weeds on site.
3. No pest infestations on site.
4. Vehicles entering site to be free of weeds and weed seeds.
Monitoring
1. As per project plan 25566-100-G01-GHX-00047 “Weed, Pest and Quarantine Management
Plan”.
Reporting
1. As per project plan 25566-100-G01-GHX-00047 “Weed, Pest and Quarantine Management
Plan”.
Corrective Action
1. As per project plan 25566-100-G01-GHX-00047 “Weed, Pest and Quarantine Management
Plan”.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 79 Revision 003
Training
1. Site Specific Induction.
2. Environmental Awareness Training – Weeds and Pest Management Modules.
3. Toolbox Talk – Weeds.
10.11. Terrestrial Flora and Fauna
Aspect
Construction of the marine facilities will require some clearing of terrestrial vegetation and disturbance of fauna.
Objectives
To minimise impacts on abundance and distribution of flora and fauna as a result of construction
activities.
Control Strategy
Protective measures will be undertaken and monitored to verify that terrestrial flora and fauna are
protected during the construction process.
Actions
1. Activities will only be undertaken in approved construction areas to avoid damage to terrestrial
plants.
2. Vegetation authorised for clearing will be clearly marked by QGC consultants.
3. Clearing will be monitored by suitably qualified QGC consultants.
4. Vehicle access to sensitive areas, such as salt marshes, mudflats, mangroves and riparian
zones, will be restricted to the minimum practical.
5. Notification will be given to DERM should any plants outside the permitted clearing zone be
damaged or disturbed. This will be entered in an Incident Register.
6. Fauna will be managed by QGC in accordance with the QGC Species Management Plan.
7. Pre-clearance surveys will be conducted by QGC to assess and potentially relocate animals
(as appropriate) inhabiting the construction area prior to vegetation clearance.
8. If applicable, recorded roosting and nest sites of the Powerful Owl and Barking Owl within the
clearing footprint will be protected where practicable.
9. If applicable, protocols for hollow bearing tree removal to minimise or avoid injury to arboreal
fauna will be implemented during construction.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 80 Revision 003
Performance Indicators
1. No unauthorised clearing
2. Low disturbance to water quality outside the construction area
Monitoring
1. Visual assessment to verify no clearing outside the approved construction area.
2. Clearance of vegetation will be monitored by appropriately qualified QGC personnel.
Reporting
1. Monthly report on activities to DERM by QGC ecologist.
Corrective Action
1. Where disturbance is impacting on the surrounding environment the work methods will be
assessed to reduce impacts.
Training
1. Site Specific Induction
2. Toolbox Talk – Terrestrial Flora and Fauna
10.12. Marine Flora and Fauna
Aspect
Marine plants (mangroves, salt couch, seagrass) are protected by legislation unless otherwise
permitted under a permit / licence.
A potential exists for environmental damage that would affect marine flora and fauna as follows;
Areas immediately around the periphery of the construction works may suffer from degradation and native flora and fauna may be dispossessed.
Construction activities may affect the vegetation on the banks of watercourses.
All native fauna are protected by law.
Objectives
1. To protect marine flora and fauna, and especially EPBC listed species including migratory
shorebirds, dugong, turtles and cetaceans, from direct or indirect damage.
2. To comply with the CECP, MOF and Construction Dock OPW Tidal Permit Conditions of Approval
(DEEDI Conditions) and relevant legislation.
Control Strategy
Protective measures will be undertaken to verify that marine flora and fauna are protected during the
construction process. . In line with best practice, these include implementation of one or a combination
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 81 Revision 003
of the following:
Note that potential impacts and specific control strategies for the EPBC listed Water Mouse (Xeromys
myoides) and migratory shorebirds are addressed separately in the:
QCLNG Environmental Management Plan - Water Mouse (Xeromys myoides) and
Migratory Shorebird Management Plan – Marine Infrastructure, QCLNG Curtis Island.
Actions
1. In accordance with the Construction Dock OPW Tidal Permit Conditions of Approval (DEEDI
Condition 4) three signs will be displayed around the development site in locations clearly visible
to the public for at least five business days prior to the commencement, during and five days
after the removal, destruction or damage of marine plants.
2. Construction activities in marine areas will be undertaken in as short a timeframe as practicable
to minimise disturbance.
3. Vessels will abide by the Port of Gladstone vessel speed restrictions and exclusion zones.
4. In accordance with the Construction Dock OPW Tidal Permit Conditions of Approval (DEEDI
Condition 5) the boundaries of the approved on-shore marine plant clearing works will be
adequately marked (e.g. with corner pegs).
5. In accordance with the Construction Dock OPW Tidal Permit Conditions of Approval (DEEDI
Condition 7) marine plant disturbances will be performed in such a manner to minimise impacts
and limit direct or in-direct disturbance of damage to adjacent tidal or marine plants.
6. In accordance with the Construction Dock OPW Tidal Permit Conditions of Approval (DEEDI
Condition 8) cleared marine vegetation will be removed from the inter-tidal zone.
7. In accordance with the Construction Dock OPW Tidal Permit Conditions of Approval (DEEDI
Condition 9) marine plant disturbance within the works buffer zone will be restricted to that area
required to support construction works.
8. In accordance with the Construction Dock OPW Tidal Permit Conditions of Approval (DEEDI
Condition 10) any tidal land profiles disturbed within the works buffer zone will be restored to
pre-works levels and prepared, managed and protected to promote natural regeneration upon
completion of the Construction Dock works.
9. External lighting will be located as necessary to comply with occupational health and safety
requirements while minimising where practicable light spill into the marine environment.
10. Light disturbance to marine turtles will be minimised to that required for safe construction.
11. Project vessels will have a Ship Board Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (SOPEP) and carry an oil
pollution spill kit.
12. Food scraps and other putrescible wastes from vessels will be disposed of in accordance with
MARPOL 73/78 Annex V (International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 82 Revision 003
[Garbage]).
13. Personnel will be trained to spot megafauna during the course of work. Megafauna identified
will be reported to QGC for formal tracking and documentation.
14. Pursuant to SEWPAC’s request of 7 October 2011 under Condition 31 of approval EPBC
2008/4401, the following procedures will no longer apply:
The proposed management measures will be used to mitigate potential impacts during
piling. In line with best practice, these include implementation of one or a combination of the
following:
Prior to commencement of activity carry out observation for marine megafauna within a
zone of 250 m for megafauna for a period of 20 minutes.
Personnel will be trained to spot marine fauna during the course of work. QGC will be
notified if marine fauna are spotted within the work zone.
If megafauna are observed within the zone, commence a slow start to operations
gradually building to full activity over a 15-minute period to allow any unseen megafauna
time to exit the zone.
During operations maintain a watch for megafauna; if they approach within 250 m
operators are to be advised and to prepare to stop activities if animals continue to
approach within 100 m.
Exclusion zones of 22m for cetaceans and dugongs and 55m for turtles will be used.
If a procedural stop is required, then recommencement follows the steps above.
Night time piling would normally occur as a continuous operation following on from daytime
piling i.e., less than one hour between consecutive hammering noise emissions will qualify
night-time piling to be conducted under normal circumstances. If a start up sequence (soft
start) is required (i.e., if piling noise has ceased for 1hr or more) then the relevant Conditions
in the EPBC Act Policy (2.1) adapted for local marine megafauna will apply.
Provided there have not been three (3) or more megafauna-caused shutdowns (i.e,
sightings within 100m) in the previous 24hrs.
Megafauna have not been spotted within the 250m exclusion zone in the last 2hrs
before sundown.
Frequent daytime sightings of megafauna within the 250m exclusion zone (i.e, more
than three (3) within 24hrs) while piling operations are underway would trigger the
proponent to contact SEWPC to discuss appropriate additional provisions for night-time
piling activity, before night-time piling would recommence.
For night-time operations, if there have been no procedurally required stoppages during the
preceding day, no observation requirements are imposed.
The following procedures, requested by SEWPAC on 7 October 2011 pursuant to Condition
31 of approval EPBC 2008/4401 will apply in relation to pile driving from marine plant upon
approval of this revision of the plan:
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 83 Revision 003
Pile driving will only be conducted during daylight hours, except in the event of a pile being in an unsafe state at dusk. In these circumstances work may continue until the individual pile is made safe before piling is ceased for the evening.
A marine mammal and sea turtle observation zone of 500m in radius from the noise emitting source will be established. During periods when pile driving is planned to occur, each morning before work begins, a wildlife lookout shall inspect the marine mammal and sea turtle observation zone for 30 minutes if the work is occurring in water deeper than 2 m. The same procedure will be followed after work has ceased for more than two hours and prior to it beginning again.
Prior to the commencement of full power pile driving, ‘soft start’ procedures that slowly ramp up the intensity of noise emissions over a period of no less than 15 minutes will be employed. These soft start techniques may include ‘fairy’ taps or alternative means of alerting and dispersing marine fauna such as broadcasting noise simulations of pile driving. Noise attenuation measures such as an air bubble curtain may also be used.
Pile driving shall not commence if a marine mammal or sea turtle is within 500m. If, after pile driving has commenced (including under soft start procedures), a marine mammal or sea turtle is observed within 100m of the noise emitting source, then pile driving shall cease. QGC notes that while these procedures will reduce daily noise from marine facilities construction, the overall period of construction, and therefore environmental disturbance, will be extended by several months. QGC reserves it rights under Condition 27 of approval EPBC 2008/4401 to submit a further revision of this plan for the Minister’s approval with a view to providing a further assessment of the environmental effects of night time piling and proposing appropriate mitigation measures to address them. The objective of any further submission will be to reduce the overall period of environmental disturbance associated with marine facilities construction.
15. Ballast water management and associated marine pest management will be undertaken in
accordance with the Weed, Pest and Quarantine Management Plan (project plan 25566-100-
G01-GHX-00047).
16. Basic information (e.g. pictures of common species) on migratory shorebirds will be
included in the site induction, and personnel will be encouraged to report any large (>10
individuals) flocks of shorebirds observed on the intertidal mudflats or claypan to
supervisors and/or environmental staff.
QGC environmental staff shall follow-up these reports by conducting a site inspection as
soon as practicable. Species diversity and the number of individuals should be recorded
during each inspection.
Records shall be kept by QGC using the standard Shorebirds 2020 datasheet available
at www.shorebirds.org.au/counting-shorebirds/forms-instructions/. Shorebirds that
cannot be identified using binoculars shall be photographed and images sent to QGC
who will engage an experienced ornithologist/ecologist for identification.
QGC environmental specialists shall inspect sediment ponds once/month at high and
low tide between December and April in the first 12 months after construction
commences. QGC will pass the data to GPC for inclusion in the Curtis Coast Regional
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 84 Revision 003
Shorebird Monitoring Report if these surveys regularly (>50% of samples) record flocks
of 10 or more individuals.
17. Pursuant to SEWPAC’s request of 7 October 2011, the following procedure is modified as
follows and will take effect upon approval of this revision of the plan:
In the event of observation of any injury to or mortality to any animal the Environmental
Manager is to be notified immediately. If the animal is an EPBC listed species, the
Environmental Manager is to notify QGC as soon as practicable and no later than 24 hours
after the first sighting of the injured or deceased animal.
Notification to QGC is to include:
Date, time, and location of first sighting of the animal;
Species;
Status: injured / dead, any apparent injuries (if safe to obtain this information)
If possible, cause of injury or mortality;
Any actions undertaken to date, and any further corrective action planned.
Note that following notification to QGC of the injury to, or mortality of, an EPBC listed species,
QGC will undertake notification to SEWPC.
Performance Indicators
1. No damage to marine flora and fauna outside the construction area.
2. Low disturbance to water quality outside the construction area.
Monitoring
1. In accordance with applicable permit conditions, monitoring of the tidal land profile regeneration
will be carried out by QGC for a period of five years from the completion of the works.
2. In accordance with applicable permit conditions, the health and structure of mangrove and other
marine plant communities within and adjacent the works buffer zone will be monitored by QGC
during for a period of 12 months from completion of tidal works construction activity.
3. Monitoring for shorebirds by QGC as specified in Action 17 above
Reporting
1. Visual assessments of water quality will be done on a regular basis.
2. QGC shall provide monitoring reports of natural regeneration biannually to the Manager,
Planning and Assessment (South) Fisheries Queensland and other agencies as required by
permit conditions, or as part of overall ecological monitoring programmes.
3. Reporting of shorebirds species and diversity as outlined in Action 17 above (QGC activity).
4. Reporting observations of injury to or mortality of any MNES listed species, as outlined in Action
18 above.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 85 Revision 003
Corrective Action
1. Where disturbance is impacting on the surrounding environment the work methods will be
assessed to reduce impacts.
Training
1. Site Specific Induction
2. Toolbox Talk – Marine Plants
10.13. Marine Pest Management
Aspect
Mobilising of plant and equipment into the marine environment has the potential to introduce marine
pests e.g. release of non-native mussels in uncontained ballast water.
Objectives
Prevent introduction and proliferation of marine pests in order to maintain existing surrounding ecosystems and maintain environmental quality.
Potential Impact to Environmental Values
Potential for environmental harm, including potential harm to the World Heritage Values of the Great
Barrier Reef Marine Park World Heritage Area, as a result of marine pest infestation.
Control Strategy
1. Limit the introduction and proliferation of potential pests through containment systems and MSQ
clearances in compliance with statutory and approval requirements.
Actions
1. Personnel shall receive induction training pertaining to the reporting of potential pests within
the construction area. Follow up training will be undertaken at toolbox meetings if required.
2. The disturbance area shall be clearly marked, including buffer zones.
3. Limit disturbance to approved construction areas only.
4. Entry to exclusion zones is not permitted by unauthorised personnel.
5. Vehicles brought to site from known weed infested areas shall be washed free of
accumulations of dirt and organic matter.
6. All personnel shall receive induction training pertaining to the management of marine flora
and fauna and protected areas on site. Follow up training will be undertaken at toolbox
meetings if required.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 86 Revision 003
7. Ballast water management and associated marine pest management will be undertaken in
accordance with the Weed, Pest and Quarantine Management Plan (project plan 25566-100-
G01-GHX-00047).
Performance Indicators
1. No introduction of pests or non-native flora and fauna as a direct result of construction
activities.
Monitoring
1. Regular visual inspections of the site to verify no introduced pests.
2. Any suspected marine pests shall be reported to QGC.
Reporting
1. Any suspected marine pests should be recorded by QGC and reported to the DPIF and GPC.
2. Any disturbance outside the designated work area is to be reported.
Corrective Action
1. Reinstatement of area if works are beyond limits of construction.
2. Assess the potential for environmental harm as a result of the pest infestation, in consultation
with relevant agencies, and determine if further action measures are required.
Training
1. Site Specific Induction
2. Toolbox Talk – Marine Pests
10.14. Red Imported Fire Ant
Aspect
Red Imported Fire Ants (RIFA) may be introduced to site in high risk items including imported fill,
construction machinery, hay bales, potted plants or other landscaping materials. They are a
serious menace to people, property and the natural environment. Bites are very painful causing
blistering and sometimes an allergic reaction.
Objectives
To prevent the spread or introduction of Red Imported Fire Ant as a result of construction activities.
Control Strategy
1. Use staff awareness to assist in identification of Fire Ant colonies.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 87 Revision 003
2. Liaise with statutory bodies to assist in the eradication of RIFAs.
Actions
1. Where required Biosecurity Queensland – Department of Employment, Economic
Development and Innovation (DEEDI) shall be contacted to carry out an initial site
inspection and make sure that an Approved Risk Management Plan is in place.
2. Personnel will receive induction training to increase awareness and assist in identification
of RIFAs.
3. Activities on site shall be undertaken in accordance with the Approved Management Plan
(ARMP 3540).
4. Environmental Manager shall verify that DEEDI have not imposed any restrictions on
movements from the site. If restrictions have been imposed, all instructions will be
followed.
5. Verify that if high risk items such as materials or machinery are being brought to site from a
Fire Ant Restricted Area that a DEEDI approved Movement Certificate is supplied. In the
event that a certificate cannot be supplied, entry to the site will not be permitted.
6. Verify that suppliers of high risk materials or restricted items have an Approved Risk
Management Plan. A copy of all suppliers’ Approved Risk Management Plans shall be
maintained on site.
7. All earthmoving machinery and light vehicles brought to site from areas known to be
infected with RIFAs shall be washed free of accumulations of dirt and organic matter and
inspected before mobilisation to site. Note - currently all plant and machinery mobilised
from South East Queensland meet this criteria.
8. All subcontractors / suppliers and plant owners / operators shall be provided with
information regarding the responsibilities in terms of fire ant management.
9. If RIFAs are suspected, nests will not be disturbed as this may encourage the colony to
move. A potential RIFA infestation will be reported to DEEDI.
10. Approval shall be obtained from DEEDI prior to removing any high risk or restricted items
from the site. A fire ant declaration form or movement certificate will be required to
accompany these materials to their destination.
11. Personnel will be trained to identify RIFAs during a site specific induction as follows:
Small, reddish-brown ants (2 – 6 mm long) that are very aggressive when disturbed.
Nests commonly appear as dome-shaped mounds up to 250 mm high with no obvious
opening. However, RIFAs may also build less obvious nests in potted plants and in or
under other items stored on the ground (eg. soil, organic mulches, potting mixes, baled
hay & straw, building and landscaping materials and equipment).
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 88 Revision 003
Performance Indicators
1. No introduction of fire ant colonies on site.
Monitoring
1. DEEDI inspection of site conducted where required.
2. Weekly visual assessment of site to identify any ants that meet the identification criteria.
3. High risk or restricted items coming to site shall be inspected.
4. Remain vigilant and keep an eye out for RIFAs and their nests.
Reporting
1. All fire ant presence on site is to be reported to the Environmental Officer and DEEDI.
2. Copies of all DEEDI approved Movement Certificates shall be maintained in project files.
This documentation shall be maintained for a minimum period of 12 months.
Corrective Action
1. Identify if the RIFAs were introduced and take measures to prevent a re-occurrence.
2. Develop an action plan in consultation with the DPI&F and implement on site
Biosecurity DEEDI Call Centre Phone 13 25 23
RIFA Control Centre Phone (07) 3310 2907
Training
1. Site Specific Induction
2. Environmental Awareness Training – RIFA and Pest Management module
3. Toolbox Talk – RIFAs
10.15. Mosquito and Biting Midge
Aspect
Mosquitoes and biting midge present environmental, workplace health and a general public health
concern.
Objectives
To undertake construction activities such that potential health impacts on personnel and nearby
sensitive receptors arising from mosquitoes and biting midges are limited.
Control Strategy
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 89 Revision 003
1. The work areas will be assessed prior to undertaking works and on an informal basis to identify
potential breeding sites.
2. Controls plans will be based on, and conform to, the DERM Mosquito Management Code of
Practice for Queensland.
Actions
1. Implement project plan 25566-100-G01-GHX-00056 “Mosquito and Biting Management
Plan”.
Performance Indicators
1. Minimise production of potential mosquito and biting midge breeding sites resulting from
construction activities.
Monitoring
1. As per project plan 25566-100-G01-GHX-00056 “Mosquito and Biting Management Plan”.
Reporting
1. As per project plan 25566-100-G01-GHX-00056 “Mosquito and Biting Management Plan”..
Corrective Action
1. As per project plan 25566-100-G01-GHX-00056 “Mosquito and Biting Management Plan”.
Training
1. Site Specific Induction
10.16. Visual Amenity
Aspect
Maintaining the visual amenity of the marine facilities and surrounding area.
Objectives
To reduce as much as practicable potential impacts on visual amenity associated with the
construction of the marine facilities, and in particular the impact on the world heritage values of
“aesthetics and natural beauty” of the GBRWHA area (noting that these world heritage values are
already attenuated by the presence of Port of Gladstone industrial elements in the viewshed, and that
the Gladstone Port is not ‘‘pristine’’ nor representative of the “exceptional natural beauty” assigned to
the World Heritage and National Heritage values).
Control Strategy
1. Construction areas will be maintained in a safe, neat and orderly manner.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 90 Revision 003
Actions
1. To limit the potential impacts on visual amenity during construction areas will be
maintained in a safe, neat and orderly manner.
Performance Indicators
1. Minimise visual impact on surrounding areas (residential/marine).
2. No complaints regarding visual amenity from construction activities.
Monitoring
1. Monitoring of complaints on visual amenity will occur throughout construction (QGC
activity).
Reporting and Corrective Action
1. Non-compliance and Incident reporting will be investigated and closed out by
Environmental Manager.
2. Complaints will be referred to QGC for follow-up and resolution.
Training
1. Site Specific Induction.
10.17. Lighting
Aspect
Lighting will be required for some construction activities for safe operations and may impact on the
surrounding neighbours, mariners and marine fauna.
Objectives
To reduce as much as practicable lighting impacts on sensitive receptors, including EPBC listed
marine fauna including migratory shorebirds, dugong, turtles and cetaceans.
Lights used on the Construction Dock and Material Off-loading Facility are installed to reduce light-
spill over intertidal areas which may be habitat for EPBC listed migratory shorebirds
Potential Impacts on Environmental Values
Construction lighting at the ISA/Construction Dock may be visible by the surrounding neighbours,
mariners and marine fauna.
Control Strategy
Lighting design guidelines will be developed and implemented.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 91 Revision 003
Actions
1. Lighting will only be available for the duration of the illumination requirement.
2. Vehicular roadways will not be lit unless necessary. Low or ground level reflectors and
reflective road lines will be utilised instead.
3. As far as practicable lighting (with the exception of emergency lighting) will be localised.
4. Permanent lighting will comply with lighting design guidelines.
5. Lights will be directed away from the Port of Gladstone to the extent possible.
6. External lighting will be located as necessary to comply with occupational health and safety
requirements while minimizing where practicable light spill into marine environment.
7. Measures that will be implemented to mitigate against the attraction of marine fauna into
the work area and surroundings will be the following:
External lighting located as necessary to comply with occupational health and safety requirements while minimising where practicable light spill into the marine environment.
Light disturbance to marine turtles will be minimised to that required for safe
construction
Food scraps from vessels will be disposed of in accordance with MARPOL 73/78
Annex V (International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships
[Garbage]), and land based work adjacent to the water will have waste stored in
suitable receptacles, and be removed on a minimum once daily basis.
8. Complaints will be referred to QGC for follow-up and resolution.
Performance Indicators
1. Comply with lighting standards for permanent lighting design.
2. Minimal complaints regarding lighting from surrounding residential and marine uses.
Monitoring
1. Complaints will be referred to QGC for follow-up and resolution.
Reporting
1. QGC shall provide regular updates to the community (e.g. complaints, newspaper articles,
reference group meetings).
2. Complaints will be referred to QGC for follow-up and resolution.
Corrective Action
1. Identify cause of non-conformance and modify construction methods.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 92 Revision 003
2. Where feasible implement barriers and or signs.
Training
1. Provide additional training to personnel where appropriate.
10.18. Marine Traffic Management
Aspect
A potential exists for traffic delays and/or accidents due to the following:
Increased risk of ship accidents due to increased volume of traffic within the Gladstone Harbour and the Narrows Area.
Objectives
1. Limit marine traffic accidents and maintain navigational safety
2. Limit disturbance to the recreational boat users of the Gladstone Harbour.
Control Strategy
1. QGC to notify surrounding recreational boat users at earliest convenience of any potential
disruptions.
2. QGC to keep recreational boating community informed by regular Project communication (e.g.
updates in construction progress, delays etc.)
3. QGC develop a transparent Communication plan.
4. QGC consult with other stakeholders wherever required.
Actions
1. QGC shall consult with boating community to identify activities.
2. QGC shall designate a Community Liaison Officer (CLO) for the duration of the contract.
3. Activities will be planned to reduce the impact on the surrounding boating community as much
as practicable.
4. Warning signs and navigation markers will be erected where required.
5. Marine plant and equipment used must comply with the “Standard for Marine Construction
Activities within the Gladstone Harbour” (www.msq.gov.qld.au).
6. Gladstone Ports Corporation (GPC) will be consulted during the development of suitable routes
and the planned delivery of major/heavy loads to limit disruption to local traffic.
7. QGC shall record complaints, and action in accordance with established procedure.
Performance Indicators
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 93 Revision 003
1. Minimal environmental nuisance to nearby residents or the public from construction activities.
2. No complaints from nearby residents.
Monitoring
1. Complaints will be referred to QGC for follow-up and resolution.
Reporting
1. Non- Compliance and Incident Reporting will be investigated and closed out by Contractor
HSSE Manager.
2. Complaints will be referred to QGC for follow-up and resolution.
Corrective Action
1. Identify cause of non-conformance and modify construction methods.
2. Where feasible, implement barriers and/or signs.
3. Provide additional training to personnel where appropriate.
Training
1. Site Specific Induction
2. Toolbox Talk – Stakeholder Relations
3. Toolbox Talk – Complaints Management
10.19. Indigenous Cultural Heritage
Aspect
No significant indigenous cultural heritage values have been identified within the construction area,
however there is always the possibility that cultural artefacts will be unearthed during the
construction phase and may be damaged or destroyed.
Objectives
To prevent harm to Indigenous cultural heritage items during construction.
The key objectives are:
1. Prevent or limit damage to potential indigenous cultural heritage sites and artefacts.
2. Report all potential sites or artefacts to traditional owners and DERM.
Potential Impacts on Indigenous Cultural Heritage
Damage may occur during excavation to artefacts that were not previously identified.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 94 Revision 003
Control Strategy
1. To educate personnel on the identification of indigenous cultural heritage and understand the duty
of care requirements.
2. To prevent damage to Indigenous cultural heritage items (sites, areas etc) through increased
awareness of the importance of indigenous cultural heritage.
3. To promote the preservation of indigenous cultural heritage.
Actions
1. Personnel will be advised at induction and at subsequent tool box meetings of requirements
with regards to Indigenous cultural heritage issues.
2. If, during construction of the works, items of cultural heritage are discovered, construction
activity at the particular location will cease immediately and the items will be left and kept in
a safe condition. Bechtel Environmental Manager shall be notified immediately.
3. The construction area will be clearly defined and no works will occur outside this area.
4. The find will not be removed or further disturbed unless given direction by the Aboriginal
Authority and DERM through QGC.
5. If, during construction of the Works, human skeletal remains are exposed, construction
activity in the vicinity of the particular location shall cease immediately and the Police will be
notified immediately of the find. Site Manager will be notified immediately of the discovery.
No work shall be resumed until the Police have authorised access.
6. Exclusion zones shall be established and clearly signed around all areas of known cultural
heritage value within the construction site.
7. Entry to exclusion zones shall only be permitted for authorised personnel only.
Performance Indicators
1. No unauthorised disturbance to Indigenous cultural heritage sites.
2. No damage to Indigenous cultural heritage artefacts or sites.
Monitoring
1. Visual monitoring of construction works, including clearing of vegetation and ground
disturbance activities for the presence of items of indigenous cultural heritage significance.
2. Watching brief to be maintained during clearing and topsoil stripping activities.
Reporting
1. Identify cause of damage to cultural heritage items and provide additional training to
personnel in recognition of such items.
2. Incidents shall be logged, investigated and actioned.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 95 Revision 003
3. Surveys and monitoring conducted will be recorded, when earth disturbing activities are
underway.
Corrective Action
1. Take corrective actions as directed by QGC.
Training
1. Site Specific Induction
2. Environmental Awareness Training – Indigenous Cultural Heritage Module.
3. Toolbox Talk – Indigenous Cultural Heritage
10.20. Non-Indigenous Cultural Heritage
Aspect
No significant Non-indigenous cultural heritage values have been identified within the construction
area.
Objectives
To prevent harm to Non-Indigenous cultural heritage items during construction.
The key objectives are:
1. Prevent or limit damage to potential indigenous cultural heritage sites and artefacts.
2. Report potential sites or artefacts to QGC.
Potential Impacts on Non-Indigenous Cultural Heritage
Damage may occur during excavation to non-indigenous cultural heritage artefacts that were not
previously identified.
Control Strategy
1. To educate personnel on the identification of non-indigenous cultural heritage and understand the
duty of care requirements.
2. To prevent damage to non-indigenous cultural heritage items, sites, areas etc. through increased
awareness of the importance of and protection of non-indigenous cultural heritage.
3. To promote the preservation of non-indigenous cultural heritage.
Actions
1. Personnel will be advised at induction and at subsequent tool box meetings of
requirements in regard to non-indigenous cultural heritage issues.
2. Areas of non-indigenous cultural heritage significance shall be clearly identified, marked
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 96 Revision 003
and where required protected.
3. Disturbance to or removal of any unmarked non-indigenous cultural heritage sites /
material is not permitted without permission.
4. Exclusion zones shall be established and clearly signed around areas of known non-
indigenous cultural heritage value within the construction site.
5. Entry to exclusion zones shall only be permitted for authorised personnel only.
Performance Indicators
1. No unauthorised disturbance to non-indigenous cultural heritage sites.
2. No damage to non-indigenous cultural heritage artefacts or sites.
Monitoring
1. Visual monitoring of construction works, including clearing of vegetation and ground
disturbance activities for the presence of items of non-indigenous cultural heritage
significance.
2. Watching brief to be maintained during clearing and topsoil stripping activities.
Reporting
1. Identify cause of damage to non-indigenous cultural heritage items and provide additional
training to personnel in recognition of such items.
2. Incidents shall be logged, investigated and actioned.
Corrective Action
1. Take corrective actions as directed by QGC.
Training
1. Site Specific Induction
2. Environmental Awareness Training – Non-Indigenous Cultural Heritage Module.
3. Toolbox Talk – Non-Indigenous Cultural Heritage
10.21. Stakeholder Management
Aspect
A potential exists for poor stakeholder relations due to the following:
Neighbouring properties, recreational users of Curtis Island and mariners may be in proximity to
the work, and there is a risk that they may be adversely affected by construction activities.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 97 Revision 003
QGC as the proponent will assume the lead in all stakeholder consultations.
Objectives
1. Limit disturbance of nearby properties, recreational users of Curtis Island and mariners.
Control Strategy
1. QGC to notify community at earliest convenience of any potential disruptions.
2. QGC to inform community by regular Project communication (e.g. Updates, project progress,
delays, etc)
3. QGC to maintain transparent community relations
4. QGC to consult with other stakeholders (e.g. schools, interest groups etc) wherever required.
Actions
1. Construction activities will be planned to have minimal impact on the community.
2. No timber, water, gravel or any other resource will be taken from adjoining land without the
written consent of the land owner.
3. Road warning signs and lighting will be erected where required.
4. QGC to advise landholders likely to be affected of the construction program, of heavy or large
loads.
5. The use of buses and car pools by the workforce will be encouraged in order to limit disruption
to local traffic.
6. All efforts shall be made to check that gates and fences bounding the site and access roads
through the site are maintained in good repair.
7. Personnel will be advised at induction not to trespass on neighbouring properties.
8. Complaints will be referred to QGC for follow-up and resolution.
Performance Indicators
1. Minimal environmental nuisance to neighbouring properties or the public from construction
activities.
2. Minimal complaints from nearby residents.
Monitoring
1. Visual inspections of neighbouring boundaries.
2. Complaints will be referred to QGC for follow-up and resolution.
Reporting
1. Complaints will be referred to QGC for follow-up and resolution.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 98 Revision 003
2. QGC shall provide regular updates to the community (e.g. complaints, newspaper articles,
reference group meeting etc).
Corrective Action
1. Identify cause of non-conformance and modify construction methods.
2. Where feasible, implement barriers and/or signs.
3. Provide additional training to personnel where appropriate.
Training
1. Site Specific Induction
2. Toolbox Talk – Stakeholder Relations
3. Toolbox Talk – Complaints Management
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 99 Revision 003
11. Environmental Performance
11.1. Environmental Inspection
The Environmental Manager or designee, will perform and document regular field inspections to
verify that the relevant environmental requirements specified in this CECP are being implemented
during construction activities. The actual inspection schedules will be dictated by the type of
construction activities occurring and the environmental requirements relevant to those activities.
Subcontractors will be expected to inspect their work areas and storage/laydown areas daily.
Environmental Manager will periodically verify these activities are occurring by reviewing the
Subcontractor’s environmental records using Environmental Field Inspection Procedures, including
applicable checklists and forms for completing the inspections.
The environmental inspection checklists will include details of observations, the responsible party,
and when the situation will be mitigated. Example checklists are included as Attachment D.
Environmental Manager will implement required environmental improvements and maintain an
Action Tracking database that will identify the status of corrective actions. Open actions will be
reviewed in the weekly progress meeting to help promote timely closeout.
If necessary, “stop work” orders will be issued if construction activities are not in accordance with
the applicable environmental requirements and may result in a significant adverse impact to the
environment if the activity continues. For example, a culturally significant artefact find or a
significant hazardous substance spill. If such conditions exist, Environmental Manager will take
appropriate action to halt and correct the problem and immediately notify Site Manager, and other
personnel, as appropriate. The construction activity in question will not resume until corrective
actions have been taken.
Should site self assessments by Environmental Manager indicate trends considered unacceptable
by Site Manager, offsite evaluations and audits may be performed through Contractor and/or QGC
HSSE personnel. The results of those evaluations will be shared with Site Manager and HSSE
Manager.
Inspections records and audit reports will be available for review by the administering authority
upon request.
11.2. Environmental Auditing
Auditing is to be undertaken to confirm that activities are carried out in line with the defined
requirements, and are producing the required performance outcomes. The audits will cover a
spectrum, from compliance with strategic procedures to compliance with job-specific procedures.
These audits will be initiated by the QGC Environmental Manager and performed by a suitably
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 100 Revision 003
qualified external Third Party Auditor who is accepted by the administering authority. A copy of the
final version of the auditor’s report will be submitted directly to QGC, and accompanied with a
statutory declaration, stating that the report accurately represents the findings of the Third Party
Auditor.
An audit procedure will include the following:
Review the scope, plan and schedule of the audit.
- Examine objective evidence (documented environmental records, direct observations of
non-conformance/potential opportunities and personnel interviews) to verify conformance
with CECP requirements.
- Give specific attention to continual improvement actions developed in response to previous
audit findings.
- Post-audit communication to present audit findings, clarify any misunderstandings and
summarise the audit findings.
An Audit Summary Report will be completed by QGC within three weeks of completing an
audit and the results discussed at the next management meeting.
A summary of Project elements that will be subject to audit is provided in Table 11-1 below.
Table 11-1 Suggested Audit Requirements
Element to be Audited Area or Function to be Audited
Application of CECP Audit to determine the extent of compliance with the various components of the CECP.
Monitoring results and documentation
Audit monitoring results against defined performance criteria. Have results of monitoring and inspection programs been
documented? Have environmental or health risks been documented and
managed?
Incident documentation and emergency preparedness
Reporting and managements of incidents.
An audit to assess management, documentation and reporting of incidents/emergency situations. Are incidents reported and documented?
Are there options available for improvement and management of processes where incidents have occurred?
Induction, training and awareness
Induction and training registers will be audited annually to verify personnel receive relevant inductions and training, as appropriate to their roles and responsibilities within the scheme.
Management Review Audit of:
Information and environmental management strategies remain current
Opportunities for improvement have been identified Requests or directions from relevant stakeholders have been
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 101 Revision 003
Element to be Audited Area or Function to be Audited
considered Changes in environmental management practices or pollution,
contamination or legislation have been incorporated The CECP has been reviewed/updated to account for changes
to the program.
11.3. Environmental Monitoring
Specific monitoring measures for the following environmental aspects, during construction, have
been discussed in the management plans presented for each aspect in the previous section:
General Construction
Construction Noise and Vibration
Soil Erosion and Sediment Control
Management of Acid Sulphate Soils
Waste Management
Refuelling and Hazardous Substances Management
Contaminated Sites
Air Quality
Greenhouse Gas
Marine Water Quality
Weed and Pest Management
Marine Flora and Fauna
Marine Pest Management
Red Imported Fire Ant
Mosquito and Biting Midge
Visual Amenity
Lighting
Traffic and Transport
Marine Traffic Management
Indigenous Cultural Heritage
Non-indigenous Cultural Heritage
Stakeholder Management
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 102 Revision 003
Monitoring will be undertaken by suitably qualified personnel. Instruments, equipment and
measuring devices used for measuring or monitoring shall be calibrated, and appropriately
operated and maintained. Results of monitoring will be maintained on record, compiled and
reported internally and will be made available for inspection. QGC will conduct necessary flora
and fauna monitoring, habitat monitoring, and any long-term ecological monitoring associated with
the project.
The administering authority must be notified within seven (7) days of completion of analysis of any
result of a monitoring program that indicates an exceedance of a limit specified in the project
approvals. The written notification shall include:
The analysis results
Details of investigation or corrective actions taken
Any subsequent analysis.
Monitoring results will be maintained on record.
11.4. Reporting and Compliance Checking
Environmental compliance reviews/coordination meetings will be held among appropriate Project
personnel, including Site Manager, HSSE Manager, the lead Subcontractor representatives and
other staff (as applicable). The purpose of these meetings is to discuss current and future
construction activities as they relate to maintaining environmental compliance. Typically, these
meetings will occur as part of the Weekly Subcontractor Progress Review Meetings, but may be
held more frequently as construction activities warrant.
11.5. Identifying Environmental Issues and Corrective Actions
11.5.1. Emergency and Incident Management
An environmental incident will be regarded as any incident that harms or has the potential to cause
significant harm to the environment. In the event that an environmental incident occurs, the
following steps will be followed immediately:
Prevent further pollution/environmental harm (including impacts on air, water quality, flora and
fauna and noise environment)
Clean-up and/or control polluting substance(s)
Implement mitigation measures to prevent recurrence of a similar incident
Document the incident and instigate an incident investigation as appropriate.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 103 Revision 003
Incidents will be reported within 24 hours to the relevant Environmental Manager. Any emergency
or incident which results in the release of contaminants or mismanagement of waste not in
accordance, or reasonably expected to be not in accordance with project approvals will be
reported by Environmental Manager to QGC. The notification of emergencies or incidents shall
include the following:
The holder of the development approval
The location of the emergency or incident
The number of the development approval
The name and telephone number of Environmental Manager
The time of the release/mismanagement incident
The time the holder became aware of the release/mismanagement incident
The suspected cause of the release/mismanagement incident
The environmental harm caused, threatened, or suspected to be caused by the
release/mismanagement incident
Actions taken to prevent further release and mitigate any environmental harm caused by the
release/mismanagement incident.
Within fourteen (14) days following the initial notification of an emergency or significant incident,
written advice shall be provided:
Proposed actions to prevent a recurrence of the emergency or incident
Outcomes of actions taken at the time to prevent or minimise environmental harm/ nuisance.
In the event of any observation of injury to or mortality of an MNES listed fauna species, response
is to undertaken as outlined in Action 18 of Section 10.12 Marine Flora and Fauna..
11.5.2. Complaints and Responses
QGC will respond to all complaints and will arrange any monitoring, inspections or investigations to
establish the circumstances surrounding the allegation. Should corrective action be necessary,
such action shall be taken to remedy the incident and to prevent recurrence.
The QGC procedure for complaints includes:
A process for receiving and responding to complaints that is acceptable to the relevant agency.
A process for registering and handling complaints received in terms of:
o Time and date of complaint
o The identity of the complainant and the recorder of the complaint
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 104 Revision 003
o The specific action or activity causing the complaint
o Whether environmental compliance requirements are being met
o The action taken to address the complaint if necessary
A database for tracking of complaints and actions taken in response
Immediate communication of the complaint to the Contractor and referral to QGC.
Details on how the action taken is to be communicated to the complainant and Bechtel
Feedback to the complainant and the relevant agency as required within a specified time
period
Any subsequent remedial action required to avoid cause for future complaints if relevant
Regular reporting to the relevant agency of complaints and corrective actions
Monitoring and auditing of the complaint handling system
12. Communication
12.1. Internal Communication
Environmental protection will be enhanced through clear and concise internal communications,
which will include regularly scheduled environmental meetings. Corrective actions raised during
environmental meetings will be recorded for follow-up.
12.2. External Communication
QGC will have responsibility for contact with environmental or other governmental agencies to
keep them informed of the work status.
12.2.1. Maritime Safety Queensland Communication Requirements
QGC shall inform the Regional Harbour Master, Maritime Safety Queensland (Gladstone) in
writing, prior to commencement of work including:
o The proposed date of commencement of construction or the establishment of plant on the
site
o The proposed timetable associated with the works
o The name and address of the on-site contractor undertaking the works
o The name and telephone number (work and after hours) of a contact for the on-site
contractor
o “For Construction” plans to be provided prior to any construction takes place
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 105 Revision 003
o Final number and position of Navigation lights to be determined
o Further consideration to be given to the mooring arrangements specifically for the mooring
of the tugs
o The construction authority must issue any notices or advertisements as required by the
Regional Harbour Master
The Project shall issue any notices or advertisements as required by the Regional Harbour
Master.
Bechtel shall comply with instructions issued by the Regional Harbour Master of completion of
the works within 14 days of practical completion.
Bechtel shall comply with instructions issued by the Regional Harbour Master, Gladstone or his
representatives and the works must be curtailed or cancelled if recommended.
12.2.2. DERM Communication Requirements
QGC shall inform DERM by written communication of the date of work commencement and
expected date of completion, at least five days prior to the commencement date.
QGC shall, within three (3) months of the date of practical completion of the works, submit to
DERM, a letter from a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland certifying that:
o The works have been constructed in accordance with the approved drawings and the
conditions of this development approval;
o The works are structurally adequate for anticipated usage; and
o The state coastal land, for a distance of 15 metres around the site of the works, is clear of
all debris.
QGC, within ten (10) days following completion of the works, shall notify the DERM so that an
inspection can be undertaken.
12.2.3. SEWPC Communication Requirements
Action 17 of Section 10.12 Marine Flora and Fauna specifies requirement with regard to
shorebird observations at the LNG Facility. QGC will provide this information to SEPWC upon
request.
Action 18 of Section 10.12 Marine Flora and Fauna specifies requirement in the event of any
observation of injury to or mortality of any EPBC listed fauna species. In the event that any
such observation is made, QGC will notify SEWPC as soon as practicable after receipt of the
information.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 106 Revision 003
12.3. Community Engagement and Consultation
Stakeholder management measures specific to the construction activities have been detailed in
the management section and tables above. In general the QGC community engagement process
includes:
Early establishment of community information services which may include telephone service,
Project website and email service, regular newsletters, scheduled information sessions or
open days.
Availability of information through the QCLNG Project website generally and in response to
specific inquiries about environmental performance.
Early and on-going engagement with owners and occupants of premises adjacent to the
proposed works or proposed mitigation measures.
Where required, special procedures to respond to complaints, issues or incidents, such as
face-to-face meetings and on-going communications with affected parties and a documented
process for issues resolution.
Further to the process outlined above the consultation with property owners and occupants of
residences identified as potentially affected by the construction works, as well as the wider
community, will be conducted by QGC throughout the construction period.
13. Training and Environmental Awareness
Environmental education is an important part of an effective environmental compliance program
and the overall HSSE program. The curricula stress the importance of maintaining "environmental
awareness" in the personnel's everyday duties. Presentations will be followed by a question and
answer period.
Project personnel will receive training an induction into the CECP to familiarise them with the
relevant management systems and requirements, as appropriate to their roles and responsibilities.
Environmental management training will address:
The role of the CECP
Personnel responsibilities
Incident and emergency response
Health and safety instruction
Identification and understanding of the environmental issues outlined in the CECP
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 107 Revision 003
Specific topics as applicable to the individual’s role
Gladstone Ports Corporation Limited’s environmental policy (a copy of which will be kept on
site)
Attendance records for personnel induction/training will be maintained onsite.
13.1. New-Hire Orientation – Environmental Awareness
New-hire orientation and training is a mandated part of training for onsite construction personnel
and will be delivered by Bechtel HSSE Personnel or a designated training coordinator. In addition
to HSSE performance and site rules, the following environmental topics will be covered:
General site maintenance (e.g. good housekeeping, environmental controls maintenance).
Waste management rules and requirements (e.g., waste transfer, burn restrictions, aerosol
can segregation, storage area management, proper labelling and waste disposal).
Hazardous material/waste handling (e.g. hazard identification, MSDS, incompatible
segregation, container management, proper labelling).
Erosion and sediment control (e.g. assessing site conditions and erosion control
requirements, installing and maintaining erosion and sediment control measures while working
in an area, reporting non-functioning erosion control measures).
Sensitive areas protection (e.g. working only within approved limits, maintaining buffers zones
around sensitive resources, storing hazardous materials away from ocean shores and
streams).
Endangered species awareness and protection (e.g. endangered species in the area,
identifying unusual plants and animals in the area, reporting sightings).
Interaction with local wildlife (e.g. hunting, fishing and foraging rules, how to behave when you
encounter a wild and/or potentially dangerous animal).
Dust control measures (e.g. speed restrictions).
Pest control (e.g. red imported fire ants, biting midges, feral animals).
Unanticipated discoveries (e.g. stop work immediately if archaeological artefacts,
contaminated soils, containers, pipes, and/or tanks are discovered/uncovered, immediately
notify supervisor).
Spill prevention and response (e.g. proper storage of hazardous materials, secondary
containment, spill response, and notifications).
Environmental awareness training will be included in each construction New-Hire Orientation.
Each new starter will be required to attend New-Hire Orientation before working on the job site and
records will be kept of personnel who attend.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 108 Revision 003
13.2. Hazardous Material Management and Spill Response Training
Supervisors, foremen and subcontractors will receive additional hazardous material management
training, including how to avoid spills and how to respond to minor spills. Attendees will be
documented. This training will be presented by HSSE personnel, or designated training
coordinator.
Additional environmental training classes may be developed for Project specific situations and/or
issues.
13.3. Toolbox Talks
Toolbox Talks will be held regularly in order to cascade relevant information is communicated to
the workforce and that feedback can be provided on issues of interest or concern. These talks will
be undertaken to review issues associated with upcoming work activities, including cultural
heritage, the environment and safety. Records will be kept for Toolbox Talk Agendas, attendance
and outcomes. Sessions will include discussion of strategies to be implemented as identified in job
hazard analysis (JHAs).
13.4. Job Hazard Analysis
A JHA will be undertaken to help personnel identify, analyse and manage the hazards associated
with their work. The JHA will formalise the process of hazard identification and management that
most people follow when working. The JHA will require personnel to examine the task they are
about to undertake by:
Breaking the job into separate, defined steps.
Identifying the potential hazards (safety and environmental) that could occur during each
defined step.
Listing the method to be followed to prevent or limit the risk of injury, loss, damage or
environmental incident that may be caused by each potential hazard.
14. Emergency Preparedness and Response
Preparedness includes developing response procedures for possible emergencies, pre-positioning
emergency response materials (e.g. spill kits, fire fighting tools) and training and equipping
adequate numbers of emergency responders. In addition to the available capability of QGC and
its contractors, specialty subcontractors may be available for response to exceptional
emergencies.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 109 Revision 003
An Emergency Response Plan, including safety, security and environmental procedures,
describes the preparedness measures and response that will be conducted in the event of an
emergency. Environmental emergencies may involve spills of dangerous goods on land or water,
unanticipated discovery of hazardous materials, unanticipated discovery of cultural resources,
wildfire, unauthorised discharge of storm water or other contaminated water, unauthorised release
of air pollutants, and unexpected encounters with wildlife. Response to an emergency generally
follows these steps:
Stop the source of the problem if it is safe to do so
Contain the problem to the extent possible
Report the problem
Clean up and remediate the affected resources
15. Document Control
15.1. Document Control and Record Management
The system used for control of management and technical documents including “controlled”
documents subject to revision will enable the complete management of all documents, including
the identification of document or drawing lists, author and recipient management, and various
forms of reporting.
15.2. CECP Review
This CECP, its implementation, and the associated elements of the accompanying environmental
management systems, will be reviewed as appropriate every 12 months for conformance with the
QCLNG environmental policies and objectives, and legal and other requirements. In addition, if
during construction, Corrective or Preventative Actions are raised indicating that amendments are
required to the CECP this will also trigger the review process. A review may also be undertaken
following request by the administering authority.
The outcomes of the management review process will be incorporated as improvements to the
CECP, WMS’ and other procedures/plans, to facilitate regulatory and policy compliance and
continuous improvement.
The agenda for the management reviews will typically include:
Progress of the CECP implementation
Management effectiveness
Adequacy of resources
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Page 110 Revision 003
Results of the audits
Critical non-conformance or repeated non-conformances
Overall performance against benchmarks
Organisation changes
Training.
If the text or body of the CECP is to be updated at any stage during the construction process, a
revised copy will be submitted to QGC.
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Revision 003
Attachment A – Site Drawings
Drawing No Title
25566-100-C0K-0000-00120; Rev. E
Infrastructure Works Within Tidal Area; (temporary SWIO location shown)
25566-100-C0K-0000-00120; Rev. F
Infrastructure Works Within Tidal Area; (MOF SWIO location shown)
25566-100-CG-0000-00020; Rev. 008
Civil – Site Development; Sheet Piling and Cofferdam Plan, Profiles and Cross Sections
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 20111-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Revision 003
Attachment B – ISA and Construction Dock Risk
Register
GOLDING CONTRACTORS PTY LTDCTR86 Rev 01 Probability Exposure Consequences
A.B.N. 88 009 734 794 Risk Score GC-3-13-03 Almost Certain Very Rare
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK REGISTER Legend: U Unacceptable Risk - implement controls and reassess Quite Possible Rare
A Acceptable Risk - no additional controls necessary Unusual But Possible Infrequent
Site / Project / Location: QCLNG Construction Dock - Curtis Island - Risk Register Remotely Possible Occasional
Conceivable but Very Unlikely Frequent
Impacts and Risk Assessment Practically impossible Continuous
No. Activity Aspect Impact Comments
Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score
1 MobilisationPlant & Equipment mobilised to site
Air emissions
Greenhouse gas emissions
Generation of noise and vibration
Hydrocarbon spill resulting from equipment failures (eg. burst hoses, leaks etc)
Hydrocarbons entering water degrading water quality
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Golding
Environmental Inspection Forms, Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
Dam.>$2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$1M to $2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$500K to $1MSerious Env. HarmDam.>$100K to $500KSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100KMaterial Env. Harm
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Significance of Risk Residual Risk after ControlsControl Reference
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
High noise & vibration levels from plant and equipment is a nuisance to the fauna of the area (nesting birds etc)
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Noise Abatement Management Plan, Golding Vibration
Management, Golding Environmental Inspection
Forms, Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
U
Bechtel Noise Abatement Management Plan, Golding Vibration
Management, Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
High noise & vibration levels from plant and equipment is a nuisance to personnel on site and/or residents
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Air pollution - exhaust emissions from plant
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
ADam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
U
Bechtel Air Quality and Dust Management Plan, Golding Environmental
Awareness Training Package, Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
U
Bechtel Air Quality and Dust Management Plan, Golding Environmental
Awareness Training Package, Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
FrequentAir pollution - exhaust emissions and dust from equipment
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
AU
Bechtel Core Process - CP-406 - External Stakeholder
Interaction, Dept TMR Wide Load Transit Permits
Unusual but possible
FrequentWide loads creating traffic hazards on public roads
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Introduction of fire ants in dirt and soil
Unusual But Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Weed and Pest Management Plan,
Golding Fire Ant Managament Plan, Supplier Fire Ant
Declarations, Golding WMS
Conceivable but very unlikely
U
Bechtel Weed and Pest Management Plan,
Queensland Government Weed Seed Declaration
Forms, Golding Environmental Inspection Forms and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
FrequentIntroduction of noxious weeds in dirt and soil
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Page 1 of 15
GOLDING CONTRACTORS PTY LTDCTR86 Rev 01 Probability Exposure Consequences
A.B.N. 88 009 734 794 Risk Score GC-3-13-03 Almost Certain Very Rare
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK REGISTER Legend: U Unacceptable Risk - implement controls and reassess Quite Possible Rare
A Acceptable Risk - no additional controls necessary Unusual But Possible Infrequent
Site / Project / Location: QCLNG Construction Dock - Curtis Island - Risk Register Remotely Possible Occasional
Conceivable but Very Unlikely Frequent
Impacts and Risk Assessment Practically impossible Continuous
No. Activity Aspect Impact Comments
Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score
Dam.>$2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$1M to $2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$500K to $1MSerious Env. HarmDam.>$100K to $500KSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100KMaterial Env. Harm
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Significance of Risk Residual Risk after ControlsControl Reference
Hydrocarbons entering surface water degrading surrounding habitat
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Golding
Environmental Inspection Forms, Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
2 Piling in Marine EnvironmentPlant & Equipment mobilised to site
Greenhouse gas emissions
Generation of noise and vibration
A
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
U
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Weed and Pest Management Plan,
Queensland Government Weed Seed Declaration
Forms, Golding Environmental Inspection Forms and Golding WMS
Bechtel Weed and Pest Management Plan,
Golding Fire Ant Managament Plan, Supplier Fire Ant
Declarations, Golding WMS
Conceivable but Very Unlikely
Frequent
FrequentConceivable
but Very Unlikely
Frequent
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
UBechtel Soil Contamination
Management Plan and Golding WMS
FrequentRemotely Possible
UDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Bechtel Air Quality and Dust Management Plan, Golding Environmental
Awareness Training Package, Golding WMS
FrequentAlmost Certain
Air pollution - exhaust emissions from plant
High noise & vibration levels from plant and equipment is a nuisance to personnel on site and/or surrounding residents
Quite Possible
Frequent
High noise & vibration levels from
Disturbance of contaminated materials (eg. Tributyl Tin Deposits)
Unusual But Possible
Introduction of noxious weeds in dirt and soil
Introduction of fire ants in dirt and soil
Unusual But Possible
Quite Possible
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
URemotely Possible
FrequentBechtel Noise Abatement
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
ADam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Bechtel Noise Abatement Management Plan,
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
AU
Bechtel Soil Contamination Management Plan,
Golding Acid Sulphate Soil Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
FrequentDisturbance of acid sulphate soilsQuite
PossibleFrequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
Page 2 of 15
GOLDING CONTRACTORS PTY LTDCTR86 Rev 01 Probability Exposure Consequences
A.B.N. 88 009 734 794 Risk Score GC-3-13-03 Almost Certain Very Rare
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK REGISTER Legend: U Unacceptable Risk - implement controls and reassess Quite Possible Rare
A Acceptable Risk - no additional controls necessary Unusual But Possible Infrequent
Site / Project / Location: QCLNG Construction Dock - Curtis Island - Risk Register Remotely Possible Occasional
Conceivable but Very Unlikely Frequent
Impacts and Risk Assessment Practically impossible Continuous
No. Activity Aspect Impact Comments
Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score
Dam.>$2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$1M to $2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$500K to $1MSerious Env. HarmDam.>$100K to $500KSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100KMaterial Env. Harm
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Significance of Risk Residual Risk after ControlsControl Reference
Hydrocarbon spill resulting from equipment failures (eg. burst hoses, leaks etc)
Bechtel Surface Water and Groundwater Quality Management Plan,
Dangerous Goods and Hazardous Substances
High noise & vibration levels from plant and equipment is a nuisance to the fauna of the area (nesting birds etc)
Vibrations may cause structural damage to adjacent buildings
Quite Possible
Unusual But Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
A
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
URemotely Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Management Plan, Golding Vibration
Management, Golding Environmental Inspection
Forms, Golding WMS
Bechtel Noise Abatement Management Plan, Golding Vibration
Management, Golding Environmental Inspection
Forms, Golding WMS
FrequentRemotely Possible
U
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Frequent
Frequent
A
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
FrequentRemotely Possible
U
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Golding Scheduled
and Preventative Maintenance Program, Maintenance Records, Golding Errosion and
Sediment Control Plan, Golding Environmental
Inspections, Golding WMS
Frequent
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Golding Scheduled
and Preventative Maintenance Program, Maintenance Records,
Golding WMS
Quite Possible
Hydrocarbons entering surface water degrading water quality and surrounding habitat
Hydrocarbons entering groundwater degrading water quality
Quite Possible
Frequent
Hydrocarbons entering land and contaminating soils
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
U
Quite Possible
Remotely Possible
Remotely Possible
U
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
Frequent
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Golding Scheduled
and Preventative Maintenance Program, Maintenance Records,
Golding WMS
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
A
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Frequent
Not satisfying public perceptionsDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
ADam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
URemotely Possible
FrequentBechtel Core Process - CP-406 - External Stakeholder
Interaction
Quite Possible
Dam.>$10K to $100KWastewaters entering groundwater
UUnusual But
FrequentRemotely
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
A
Page 3 of 15
GOLDING CONTRACTORS PTY LTDCTR86 Rev 01 Probability Exposure Consequences
A.B.N. 88 009 734 794 Risk Score GC-3-13-03 Almost Certain Very Rare
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK REGISTER Legend: U Unacceptable Risk - implement controls and reassess Quite Possible Rare
A Acceptable Risk - no additional controls necessary Unusual But Possible Infrequent
Site / Project / Location: QCLNG Construction Dock - Curtis Island - Risk Register Remotely Possible Occasional
Conceivable but Very Unlikely Frequent
Impacts and Risk Assessment Practically impossible Continuous
No. Activity Aspect Impact Comments
Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score
Dam.>$2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$1M to $2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$500K to $1MSerious Env. HarmDam.>$100K to $500KSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100KMaterial Env. Harm
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Significance of Risk Residual Risk after ControlsControl Reference
Concrete spill from equipment failures (concrete pump burst, formwork burst etc)
Concrete entering groundwater degrading water quality
Unusual But Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Surface Water and Groundwater Quality Management Plan,
Dangerous Goods and Hazardous Substances Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Conceivable but Very Unlikely
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
Waste disposal
Concrete structures reducing the visual amenity of area
3Placement of Backfill material behind piles
Excavation of marine sediments, and backfill using local material and imported rock/fill material
Introduction of noxious weeds in dirt Quite Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
U
Bechtel Weed and Pest Management Plan,
Queensland Government Weed Seed Declaration
Remotely Frequent
Dam. to $10KA
Hazardous Substances Management Plan,
Golding Environmental Inspection Forms, Golding
WMS
Bechtel Surface Water and Groundwater Quality Management Plan,
Dangerous Goods and Hazardous Substances
Management Plan, Golding Machinery
Inspection Forms, Golding Safety Inspection Forms,
Golding WMS
Bechtel Waste Management Plan,
Golding Environmental Inspection Forms, Golding
WMS
Bechtel Waste Management Plan,
Golding Environmental Inspection Forms, Golding
WMS
Material Env. Harm
degrading water qualityU
PossibleFrequent
PossibleFrequent
Material Env. Harm
A
A
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
Unusual But Possible
Concrete entering surface waters degrading water quality
FrequentConceivable
but Very Unlikely
U
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
URemotely Possible
Frequent
Occasional
Bechtel Waste Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Conceivable but Very Unlikely
Degraded soil quality from excess concrete, reo, nails, formwork, packaging materials
Quite Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Degraded surface water quality from excess concrete, reo, nails, formwork, packaging materials
Quite Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
URemotely Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
ADam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
FrequentRemotely Possible
UDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
FrequentQuite
Possible
Visual pollution from excess concrete, reo, nails, formwork, packaging materials
Not satisfying public perceptionsUnusual But
PossibleFrequent
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
URemotely Possible
FrequentBechtel Core Process - CP-406 - External Stakeholder
Interaction
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
OccasionalUnusual But
PossibleConcrete entering surface waters degrading surrounding habitat
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
A
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Surface Water and Groundwater Quality Management Plan,
Dangerous Goods and Hazardous Substances Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Page 4 of 15
GOLDING CONTRACTORS PTY LTDCTR86 Rev 01 Probability Exposure Consequences
A.B.N. 88 009 734 794 Risk Score GC-3-13-03 Almost Certain Very Rare
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK REGISTER Legend: U Unacceptable Risk - implement controls and reassess Quite Possible Rare
A Acceptable Risk - no additional controls necessary Unusual But Possible Infrequent
Site / Project / Location: QCLNG Construction Dock - Curtis Island - Risk Register Remotely Possible Occasional
Conceivable but Very Unlikely Frequent
Impacts and Risk Assessment Practically impossible Continuous
No. Activity Aspect Impact Comments
Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score
Dam.>$2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$1M to $2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$500K to $1MSerious Env. HarmDam.>$100K to $500KSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100KMaterial Env. Harm
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Significance of Risk Residual Risk after ControlsControl Reference
Air emissions
Greenhouse gas emissions
Generation of noise and vibration
High noise & vibration levels from plant and equipment is a nuisance Quite
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
UBechtel Noise Abatement
Management Plan andRemotely
FrequentDam. to $10K
UBechtel Noise Abatement
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
High noise & vibration levels from plant and equipment is a nuisance to personnel on site and/or residents
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Frequent
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
AFrequent
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
A
UBechtel Air Quality and Dust Management Plan
and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Air pollution - exhaust emissions from plant
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
UBechtel Air Quality and Dust Management Plan
and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Remotely Possible
FrequentAir pollution - exhaust emissions and dust from equipment
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
UBechtel Air Quality and Dust Management Plan
and Golding WMS
and soil PossibleFrequent
Introduction of fire ants in dirt and soil
Unusual But Possible
Frequent
Air pollution - dust from stockpilesQuite
PossibleFrequent
Material Env. Harm
U Weed Seed Declaration Forms, Golding
Environmental Inspection Forms and Golding WMS
PossibleFrequent
Env. NuisanceA
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Weed and Pest Management Plan,
Golding Fire Ant Managament Plan, Supplier Fire Ant
Declarations, Golding WMS
Conceivable but very unlikely
Page 5 of 15
GOLDING CONTRACTORS PTY LTDCTR86 Rev 01 Probability Exposure Consequences
A.B.N. 88 009 734 794 Risk Score GC-3-13-03 Almost Certain Very Rare
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK REGISTER Legend: U Unacceptable Risk - implement controls and reassess Quite Possible Rare
A Acceptable Risk - no additional controls necessary Unusual But Possible Infrequent
Site / Project / Location: QCLNG Construction Dock - Curtis Island - Risk Register Remotely Possible Occasional
Conceivable but Very Unlikely Frequent
Impacts and Risk Assessment Practically impossible Continuous
No. Activity Aspect Impact Comments
Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score
Dam.>$2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$1M to $2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$500K to $1MSerious Env. HarmDam.>$100K to $500KSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100KMaterial Env. Harm
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Significance of Risk Residual Risk after ControlsControl Reference
Erosion and Sedimentation
Importation of fill materials
Dam.>$10K to $100K
A
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Soil contamination through introduction of contaminated material in imported fill
Unusual But Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
UBechtel Soil Contamination
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Conceivable but Very Unlikely
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Changes to natural flows causing localised flooding
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Stormwater, Soil Erosion and Sedimentation
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Bechtel Stormwater, Soil Erosion and Sedimentation
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Stormwater, Soil Erosion and Sedimentation
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
to the fauna of the area (nesting birds etc)
PossibleFrequent
Material Env. Harm
U Management Plan and Golding WMS
PossibleFrequent
Env. Nuisance
AU
Bechtel Stormwater, Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Spillage on public roads leading to Quite
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K Remotely
Frequent
A
A
A
UBechtel Air Quality and Dust Management Plan
and Golding WMS
Conceivable but Very Unlikely
Loss or degradation of soil Quite
Possible
Loss of sediment into surface water degrading water quality
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
U
Spillage on public roads creating dust nuisance
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Frequent
Page 6 of 15
GOLDING CONTRACTORS PTY LTDCTR86 Rev 01 Probability Exposure Consequences
A.B.N. 88 009 734 794 Risk Score GC-3-13-03 Almost Certain Very Rare
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK REGISTER Legend: U Unacceptable Risk - implement controls and reassess Quite Possible Rare
A Acceptable Risk - no additional controls necessary Unusual But Possible Infrequent
Site / Project / Location: QCLNG Construction Dock - Curtis Island - Risk Register Remotely Possible Occasional
Conceivable but Very Unlikely Frequent
Impacts and Risk Assessment Practically impossible Continuous
No. Activity Aspect Impact Comments
Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score
Dam.>$2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$1M to $2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$500K to $1MSerious Env. HarmDam.>$100K to $500KSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100KMaterial Env. Harm
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Significance of Risk Residual Risk after ControlsControl Reference
Hydrocarbon spill resulting from equipment failures (eg. burst hoses, leaks etc) or vehicular accident
Hydrocarbons entering surface water degrading water quality
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
Hydrocarbons entering surface water degrading surrounding habitat
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
Hydrocarbons entering groundwater degrading water quality
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
Hydrocarbons entering land and contaminating soils
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
Land disturbance
Stockpiling of material
A
Frequent
Water quality degradation by leaching of sediments (eg p H
Quite Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
U
Disturbance of contaminated materials (eg. old waste dump etc)
Unusual But Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Material Env. Harm
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Bechtel Surface Water and Groundwater Quality
Management Plan and Soil Remotely Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
AUBechtel Soil Contamination
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Conceivable but Very Unlikely
Disturbance of acid sulphate soilsQuite
PossibleFrequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Soil Contamination Management Plan, Acid
Sulphate Soil Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
A
UBechtel Unanticipated
Discoveries Management Plan and Golding WMS
Conceivable but Very Unlikely
Frequent
UManagement Plan and
Golding WMS
Damage to cultural heritage sites and artefacts
Unusual But Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
sediment entering waterways PossibleFrequent
Material Env. Harm
PossibleFrequent
A
Page 7 of 15
GOLDING CONTRACTORS PTY LTDCTR86 Rev 01 Probability Exposure Consequences
A.B.N. 88 009 734 794 Risk Score GC-3-13-03 Almost Certain Very Rare
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK REGISTER Legend: U Unacceptable Risk - implement controls and reassess Quite Possible Rare
A Acceptable Risk - no additional controls necessary Unusual But Possible Infrequent
Site / Project / Location: QCLNG Construction Dock - Curtis Island - Risk Register Remotely Possible Occasional
Conceivable but Very Unlikely Frequent
Impacts and Risk Assessment Practically impossible Continuous
No. Activity Aspect Impact Comments
Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score
Dam.>$2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$1M to $2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$500K to $1MSerious Env. HarmDam.>$100K to $500KSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100KMaterial Env. Harm
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Significance of Risk Residual Risk after ControlsControl Reference
Pit dewatering leading to scouring
Pit dewatering without testing discharge waters
Damage to sewerage & water mains leading to leakage of waters
Wastewaters entering surface water degrading water quality
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Surface Water and Groundwater Quality
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
A
Wastewaters entering surface water degrading surrounding habitat
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$500K to $1M
Serious Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Surface Water and Groundwater Quality
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
A
Wastewaters entering groundwater degrading water quality
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Surface Water and Groundwater Quality
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
AU
Bechtel Surface Water and Groundwater Quality
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
FrequentSurface water quality degradationQuite
PossibleFrequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
U
Bechtel Surface Water and Groundwater Quality
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
A
U
Bechtel Surface Water and Groundwater Quality
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Conceivable but Very Unlikely
Frequent
A
Soil quality degradation by leaching of sediments (eg. pH changes)
Quite Possible
Frequent Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
leaching of sediments (eg. p H changes)
PossibleFrequent
Serious Env. Harm
UContamination
Management Plan and Golding WMS
PossibleFrequent
Material Env. Harm
Legal non complianceQuite
PossibleFrequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
Unprotected discharge point leading to erosion from water pressure
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
UBechtel Soil Contamination
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Page 8 of 15
GOLDING CONTRACTORS PTY LTDCTR86 Rev 01 Probability Exposure Consequences
A.B.N. 88 009 734 794 Risk Score GC-3-13-03 Almost Certain Very Rare
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK REGISTER Legend: U Unacceptable Risk - implement controls and reassess Quite Possible Rare
A Acceptable Risk - no additional controls necessary Unusual But Possible Infrequent
Site / Project / Location: QCLNG Construction Dock - Curtis Island - Risk Register Remotely Possible Occasional
Conceivable but Very Unlikely Frequent
Impacts and Risk Assessment Practically impossible Continuous
No. Activity Aspect Impact Comments
Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score
Dam.>$2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$1M to $2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$500K to $1MSerious Env. HarmDam.>$100K to $500KSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100KMaterial Env. Harm
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Significance of Risk Residual Risk after ControlsControl Reference
Wastewaters entering land and contaminating soils
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Surface Water and Groundwater Quality
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
Bitumen and Asphalt Deliveries
4Installation of Underground Services - water, conduits
Air emissions
Generation of noise and vibration
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
AUBechtel Core Process - CP-406 - External Stakeholder
Interaction
Remotely Possible
OccasionalVisual pollution from excess bitumen or asphalt
Unusual But Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Occasional
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
A
Soil quality degradation from excess bitumen or asphalt
Quite Possible
Surface water quality degradation from excess bitumen or asphalt
Unusual But Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Surface Water and Groundwater Quality
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Conceivable but Very Unlikely
Remotely Possible
Occasional
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
AFrequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
UBechtel Soil Contamination
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Occasional
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
ATraffic problems on public roadsQuite
PossibleFrequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
UBechtel Core Process - CP-406 - External Stakeholder
Interaction
Remotely Possible
FrequentRemotely Possible
UDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Air pollution - dust from plant and equipment
FrequentQuite
PossibleAir pollution - exhaust emissions from plant and equipment
Noise & vibration levels from plant and equipment (cranes, small tools etc) is a nuisance to personnel on site and/or nearby residents
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
ADam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Bechtel Air Quality and Dust Management Plan
and Golding WMS
Bechtel Air Quality and Dust Management Plan
and Golding WMS
FrequentQuite
Possible
Quite Possible
Frequent
FrequentRemotely Possible
U
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
ADam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
URemotely Possible
FrequentBechtel Noise Abatement
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Page 9 of 15
GOLDING CONTRACTORS PTY LTDCTR86 Rev 01 Probability Exposure Consequences
A.B.N. 88 009 734 794 Risk Score GC-3-13-03 Almost Certain Very Rare
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK REGISTER Legend: U Unacceptable Risk - implement controls and reassess Quite Possible Rare
A Acceptable Risk - no additional controls necessary Unusual But Possible Infrequent
Site / Project / Location: QCLNG Construction Dock - Curtis Island - Risk Register Remotely Possible Occasional
Conceivable but Very Unlikely Frequent
Impacts and Risk Assessment Practically impossible Continuous
No. Activity Aspect Impact Comments
Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score
Dam.>$2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$1M to $2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$500K to $1MSerious Env. HarmDam.>$100K to $500KSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100KMaterial Env. Harm
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Significance of Risk Residual Risk after ControlsControl Reference
Delivery of pipes, conduits, sand etc
Hydrocarbon spill resulting from equipment failures (eg. burst hoses, leaks etc)
Waste disposal
5Plant and equipment maintenance and servicing - Marine works
Establishment of site workshop covered by earthworks, concrete works and underground services sections
Refer above N/A N/A N/A
Transportation of large volumes of hydrocarbons to site
Accident involving transportation of large volume of hydrocarbons to
site
Increased vehicular movements on public roads - poor public relations
Unusual But Possible
OccasionalDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Surface water and
Groundwater Quality Management PlanBechtel Dangerous Goods
and Hazardous Substances Management
Noise & vibration levels from plant and equipment (cranes, small tools etc) is a nuisance to the fauna of the area (nesting birds etc)
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Frequent
URemotely Possible
Frequent
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Bechtel Core Process - CP-406 - External Stakeholder
Interaction
UCEMP & ECP's - Noise and Vibration Section
Traffic problems on public roads. Not satisfying public perceptions
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
A
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
FrequentRemotely Possible
U
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan and Golding WMS
FrequentQuite
PossibleHydrocarbons entering soil resulting in contamination
Hydrocarbons entering surface water degrading water quality and surrounding habitat
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
URemotely Possible
Frequent
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Surface water and
Groundwater Quality Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Quite Possible
FrequentSoil contamination from excess tape, glues, rubber bands, packaging materials etc
Degraded surface water quality from excess tape, glues, rubber bands, packaging materials etc
FrequentQuite
PossibleA
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Bechtel Waste Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
URemotely Possible
FrequentBechtel Waste
Management Plan and Golding WMS
A
FrequentRemotely Possible
U
Visual pollution from excess tape, glues, rubber bands, packaging materials etc
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
URemotely Possible
FrequentBechtel Waste
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Quite Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
URemotely Possible
OccasionalDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Bechtel Core Process - CP-406 - External Stakeholder
InteractionA
Hydrocarbons entering surface water degrading water quality and surrounding habitat
Hydrocarbons entering groundwater
URemotely Possible
Occasional
Dam.>$1M to $2M
Serious Env. Harm
AQuite
PossibleFrequent
Dam.>$1M to $2M
Serious Env. Harm
Quite U
Dam.>$1M to $2M
Frequent A
Dam.>$1M to $2M
OccasionalRemotely
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
AQuite
Possible
Page 10 of 15
GOLDING CONTRACTORS PTY LTDCTR86 Rev 01 Probability Exposure Consequences
A.B.N. 88 009 734 794 Risk Score GC-3-13-03 Almost Certain Very Rare
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK REGISTER Legend: U Unacceptable Risk - implement controls and reassess Quite Possible Rare
A Acceptable Risk - no additional controls necessary Unusual But Possible Infrequent
Site / Project / Location: QCLNG Construction Dock - Curtis Island - Risk Register Remotely Possible Occasional
Conceivable but Very Unlikely Frequent
Impacts and Risk Assessment Practically impossible Continuous
No. Activity Aspect Impact Comments
Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score
Dam.>$2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$1M to $2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$500K to $1MSerious Env. HarmDam.>$100K to $500KSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100KMaterial Env. Harm
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Significance of Risk Residual Risk after ControlsControl Reference
Fire and Explosion
Air emissions
Generation of noise and vibration
Hydrocarbon spill resulting from equipment failures (eg. burst hoses, leaks etc)
Hydrocarbon spill during refuelling and maintenance
Quite Possible
Quite Possible
Hydrocarbons entering groundwater degrading water quality
Hydrocarbons entering water degrading water quality and surrounding habitat
Bechtel Air Quality and Dust Management Plan
and Golding WMS
Bechtel Noise Abatement Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Plan, Surface water and Groundwater Quality Management Plan
Bechtel Air Quality and Dust Management Plan
and Golding WMS
degrading water quality PossibleU
Serious Env. Harm
Frequent ASerious Env.
Harm
Occasional
A
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
Possible
OccasionalConceivable
but Very Unlikely
U
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
Golding Emergency Response Plan and
Golding WMSFrequent
Unusual But Possible
Loss of human lifeUnusual But
PossibleFrequent
Destruction of buildings from fire
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
UConceivable
but Very Unlikely
OccasionalGolding Emergency Response Plan and
Golding WMS
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
A
Poor public relationsUnusual But
PossibleFrequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
UConceivable
but Very Unlikely
Occasional
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
A
Air pollution - exhaust emissionsRemotely Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Bechtel Core Process - CP-406 - External Stakeholder
Interaction and Golding Emergency Response Plan and Golding WMS
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
UAir pollution - gas cylinder releasesQuite
Possible
Quite Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
U
A
A
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
FrequentRemotely Possible
Remotely Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Noise & vibration levels from plant and equipment (cranes, welders, small tools etc) is a nuisance to personnel on site and/or surrounding residents
Noise & vibration levels from plant and equipment cranes, welders, small tools etc) is a nuisance to the fauna of the area (nesting birds etc)
Quite Possible
U
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
FrequentUnusual But
Possible
ADam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
FrequentRemotely Possible
U
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
FrequentBechtel Noise Abatement
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Hydrocarbons entering land and contaminating soils
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
URemotely Possible
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Surface water and
Groundwater Quality Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
URemotely Possible
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Surface water and
Groundwater Quality Management Plan and
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
A
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
FrequentRemotely Possible
U
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
Frequent
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Surface water and
Groundwater Quality Management Plan and
Quite Possible
Hydrocarbons entering land and contaminating soils
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
URemotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Surface water and
Groundwater Quality Management Plan and
A
AHydrocarbons entering surface water degrading water quality and surrounding habitat
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
FrequentRemotely Possible
U
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Surface water and
Groundwater Quality Management Plan and
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
FrequentQuite
Possible
Page 11 of 15
GOLDING CONTRACTORS PTY LTDCTR86 Rev 01 Probability Exposure Consequences
A.B.N. 88 009 734 794 Risk Score GC-3-13-03 Almost Certain Very Rare
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK REGISTER Legend: U Unacceptable Risk - implement controls and reassess Quite Possible Rare
A Acceptable Risk - no additional controls necessary Unusual But Possible Infrequent
Site / Project / Location: QCLNG Construction Dock - Curtis Island - Risk Register Remotely Possible Occasional
Conceivable but Very Unlikely Frequent
Impacts and Risk Assessment Practically impossible Continuous
No. Activity Aspect Impact Comments
Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score
Dam.>$2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$1M to $2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$500K to $1MSerious Env. HarmDam.>$100K to $500KSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100KMaterial Env. Harm
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Significance of Risk Residual Risk after ControlsControl Reference
Wash down of tools, plant and equipment
Hydrocarbons entering land and contaminating soils
Hydrocarbons entering surface water degrading water quality and surrounding habitat
Hydrocarbons entering groundwater degrading water quality
Rain causing overflow from hydrocarbon storage bunds
Poor disposal of regulated Waste
General Waste Disposal
Bechtel Waste Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Bechtel Waste Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Bechtel Waste Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Hydrocarbons entering groundwater degrading water quality
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
URemotely Possible
Occasional
AURemotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Surface water and
Groundwater Quality Management Plan and
AUnusual But
Possible
Unusual But Possible
Occasional
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Occasional
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Bechtel Waste Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Surface water and
Groundwater Quality Management Plan and
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Surface water and
Groundwater Quality Management Plan and
A
Unusual But Possible
Remotely Possible
U A
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Occasional
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Occasional
URemotely Possible
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Surface water and
Groundwater Quality Management Plan and
Occasional
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
Hydrocarbons entering land and contaminating soils
Quite Possible
Occasional
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
URemotely Possible
Occasional
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Surface water and
Groundwater Quality Management Plan and
Hydrocarbons entering water degrading water quality
Quite Possible
Occasional
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
URemotely Possible
Occasional
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Surface water and
Groundwater Quality Management Plan and
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
U
Quite Possible
Frequent U
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Legal non - compliance
Land contamination from battery acids
Quite Possible
Frequent
Land contamination from steel scraps
Land contamination from oily rags and filters
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
U
Quite Possible
FrequentRemotely Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Remotely Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Remotely Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Remotely Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Remotely Possible
FrequentVisual pollution from excess packaging
Poor public relations if housekeeping not up to scratch
Quite Possible
Frequent
FrequentQuite
Possible
Bechtel Waste Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Bechtel Core Process - CP-406 - External Stakeholder
Interaction and Bechtel Waste Management Plan
and Golding WMS
ADam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
FrequentRemotely Possible
UDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
U
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
U
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
A
A
Water Contamination from poor waste disposal practices
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
UBechtel Waste
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Page 12 of 15
GOLDING CONTRACTORS PTY LTDCTR86 Rev 01 Probability Exposure Consequences
A.B.N. 88 009 734 794 Risk Score GC-3-13-03 Almost Certain Very Rare
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK REGISTER Legend: U Unacceptable Risk - implement controls and reassess Quite Possible Rare
A Acceptable Risk - no additional controls necessary Unusual But Possible Infrequent
Site / Project / Location: QCLNG Construction Dock - Curtis Island - Risk Register Remotely Possible Occasional
Conceivable but Very Unlikely Frequent
Impacts and Risk Assessment Practically impossible Continuous
No. Activity Aspect Impact Comments
Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score
Dam.>$2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$1M to $2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$500K to $1MSerious Env. HarmDam.>$100K to $500KSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100KMaterial Env. Harm
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Significance of Risk Residual Risk after ControlsControl Reference
6Site Office, Crib and Ablution Facilities
Establishment of site workshop covered by clearing and grubbing, earthworks, concrete works and underground services sections
Refer above N/A N/A N/A
Air emissions
Generation of noise
Spill of waste products from ablution facilities
Waste disposal
Paper usage Use of natural resource
Use of electricity
Storage of waste products prior to disposal off site
Bechtel Waste Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Bechtel Air Quality and Dust Management Plan
and Golding WMS
Bechtel Waste Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Surface water and
Groundwater Quality Management Plan and
Air pollution - generator exhaust emissions
Noise levels from generator and is a nuisance to personnel on site and/or nearby residents
Noise levels from generator is a nuisance to the fauna of the area (nesting birds etc)
Quite Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
FrequentQuite
Possible
Remotely Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Bechtel Air Quality and Dust Management Plan
and Golding WMSA
ADam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
FrequentRemotely Possible
UBechtel Noise Abatement
Management Plan and Golding WMS
ADam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
FrequentRemotely Possible
UBechtel Noise Abatement
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
FrequentQuite
Possible
U
ADam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
FrequentRemotely Possible
UFrequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Unusual But Possible
Wastewaters entering land and contaminating soils
Wastewaters entering surface water degrading water quality and surrounding habitat
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
UConceivable
but Very Unlikely
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Surface water and
Groundwater Quality Management Plan and
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
ADam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
FrequentConceivable
but Very Unlikely
U
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Frequent
Bechtel Dangerous Goods and Hazardous
Substances Management Plan, Surface water and
Groundwater Quality Management Plan and
Remotely Possible
Wastewaters entering groundwater degrading water quality
Land contamination (waste paper, food scraps, packaging materials etc)
Unusual But Possible
ContinuousDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
URemotely Possible
Bechtel Waste Management Plan and
Golding WMSFrequent
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
ADam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
FrequentRemotely Possible
UDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
ContinuousBechtel Waste
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Quite Possible
Surface water pollution (waste paper, food scraps, packaging materials etc)
Green house gas emissions
Feral animal populations increase as a result of feeding from food scraps
Almost Certain
Quite Possible
Quite Possible
Continuous
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
U
ContinuousDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
U
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
U ADam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
ContinuousRemotely Possible
Remotely Possible
ContinuousDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Remotely Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Page 13 of 15
GOLDING CONTRACTORS PTY LTDCTR86 Rev 01 Probability Exposure Consequences
A.B.N. 88 009 734 794 Risk Score GC-3-13-03 Almost Certain Very Rare
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK REGISTER Legend: U Unacceptable Risk - implement controls and reassess Quite Possible Rare
A Acceptable Risk - no additional controls necessary Unusual But Possible Infrequent
Site / Project / Location: QCLNG Construction Dock - Curtis Island - Risk Register Remotely Possible Occasional
Conceivable but Very Unlikely Frequent
Impacts and Risk Assessment Practically impossible Continuous
No. Activity Aspect Impact Comments
Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score
Dam.>$2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$1M to $2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$500K to $1MSerious Env. HarmDam.>$100K to $500KSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100KMaterial Env. Harm
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Significance of Risk Residual Risk after ControlsControl Reference
Poor housekeeping
7Works in a Marine Environment -Craneage, Refuelling, Maintenance, Ablution Facilities
Plant & Equipment mobilised to site
Air emissions
Generation of noise and vibrations
Sedimentation
Bechtel Weed and Pest Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Bechtel Waste Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Bechtel Waste Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Bechtel Waste Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Food scraps and wrappers scattered by birds and animals
Increased odours (human health & hygiene)
Aesthetic appeal not satisfying public perceptions
Quite Possible
Frequent
Quite Possible
Quite Possible
Continuous
ContinuousDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
URemotely Possible
ContinuousDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
U
URemotely Possible
ContinuousDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
Introduction of noxious weeds in dirt and soil
Unusual But Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
FrequentConceivable
but very unlikely
U
A
A
URemotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Bechtel Weed and Pest Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
FrequentUnusual But
PossibleIntroduction of fire ants in dirt and soil
Wide loads creating traffic hazards on public roads
Quite Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
URemotely Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Bechtel Core Process - CP-406 - External Stakeholder
InteractionA
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Air pollution - exhaust emissions from plant
Quite Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
URemotely Possible
FrequentDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Bechtel Air Quality and Dust Management Plan
and Golding WMSA
AFrequentQuite
Possible
High noise & vibration levels from plant and equipment is a nuisance to personnel on site and/or residents
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
FrequentRemotely Possible
UBechtel Noise Abatement
Management Plan and Golding WMS
ADam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Quite Possible
High noise & vibration levels from plant and equipment is a nuisance to the fauna of the area (nesting birds etc)
Loss of spoilQuite
PossibleRemotely Possible
Frequent
Bechtel Stormwater, Soil Erosion and Sedimentation
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Frequent
Frequent
FrequentRemotely Possible
UDam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Bechtel Noise Abatement Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
A
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Quite Possible
Sediment entering surface waters deteriorating water quality
Changes to natural flows causing localised flooding
Quite Possible
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Bechtel Stormwater, Soil Erosion and Sedimentation
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Frequent
Frequent
FrequentRemotely Possible
U
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Bechtel Stormwater, Soil Erosion and Sedimentation
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
A
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
U
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
U
Page 14 of 15
GOLDING CONTRACTORS PTY LTDCTR86 Rev 01 Probability Exposure Consequences
A.B.N. 88 009 734 794 Risk Score GC-3-13-03 Almost Certain Very Rare
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK REGISTER Legend: U Unacceptable Risk - implement controls and reassess Quite Possible Rare
A Acceptable Risk - no additional controls necessary Unusual But Possible Infrequent
Site / Project / Location: QCLNG Construction Dock - Curtis Island - Risk Register Remotely Possible Occasional
Conceivable but Very Unlikely Frequent
Impacts and Risk Assessment Practically impossible Continuous
No. Activity Aspect Impact Comments
Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score Probability Exposure Consquences Risk Score
Dam.>$2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$1M to $2MSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$500K to $1MSerious Env. HarmDam.>$100K to $500KSerious Env. Harm
Dam.>$10K to $100KMaterial Env. Harm
Dam. to $10KEnv. Nuisance
Significance of Risk Residual Risk after ControlsControl Reference
Hydrocarbon spill resulting from equipment failures (eg. burst hoses, leaks etc)
Spill of waste products from ablution facilities
Hydrocarbon spill during refuelling and maintenance
Land disturbance
Waste disposal
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
Bechtel Marine Fuel and Oil Spill Management Plan,
Surface Water and Groundwater Quality
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
FrequentHydrocarbons entering surface water and degrading surrounding habitats
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
U
UHydrocarbons entering surface water degrading water quality
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
Bechtel Marine Fuel and Oil Spill Management Plan,
Surface Water and Groundwater Quality
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Marine Fuel and Oil Spill Management Plan,
Surface Water and Groundwater Quality
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
A
Hydrocarbons entering surface water degrading water quality and surrounding habitat
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
FrequentQuite
Possible
Hydrocarbons entering land and contaminating soils during loading on land
Bechtel Marine Fuel and Oil Spill Management Plan,
Surface Water and Groundwater Quality
Management Plan and Golding WMS
A
A
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Bechtel Marine Fuel and Oil Spill Management Plan,
Surface Water and Groundwater Quality
Management Plan and Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Hydrocarbons entering groundwater degrading water quality
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
Spilt wastewaters entering surface water and degrading water quality
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
Disturbance of acid sulphate soilsQuite
Possible
Water pollution from items dropped into the water eg. Off cuts, excess concrete, waste etc
Quite Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
URemotely Possible
Bechtel Marine Fuel and Oil Spill Management Plan, Waste Management Plan
and Golding WMS
A
Occasional
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
A
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
U
ARemotely Possible
Frequent
Dam.>$10K to $100K
Material Env. Harm
U
Bechtel Marine Fuel and Oil Spill Management Plan,
Surface Water and Groundwater Quality
Management Plan and Golding WMS
U FrequentRemotely Possible
Bechtel Soil Contamination Management Plan and
Acid Sulphate Soils Management Plan and
Golding WMS
Remotely Possible
FrequentFrequent
Dam.>$100K to $500K
Serious Env. Harm
U
Page 15 of 15
25566-100-G
Attac
E
G01-GHX-00086
chmen
lectronic docum
© Copyright Be
6
nt C – Q
ments, once pri
Security Levechtel Oil, Gas a
QGC E
nted, are uncon
vel 2 - Bechtnd Chemicals, In
Environ
ntrolled and may
tel Confidentnc. 2011-2012. A
nmenta
y become outda
tial All rights reserve
al Poli
ated.
ed.
Revision 003
cy
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Revision 003
Attachment D – Sample Environmental Inspection
Checklist
QCLNG Weekly Environmental Inspection Checklist
Curtis Island Construction Dock Contractor: Location: Date: Time: Inspector: Accompanied by:
Item
Acc
epta
ble
Nee
ds
Imp
rove
men
t
N/A
Act
ion
R
equ
ired
General Conditions
Site generally clean and free of rubbish General appearance of work areas No rock, stone or gravel present outside the construction footprint No clearing outside the approved construction area (marine and land based) Boundaries of on-shore marine plant clearing works adequately marked Visual inspection for presence of Red Imported Fire Ant Visual inspection of site for new/expanded pest infestation (marine and land based) Inspection for presence of mosquito larvae in areas of ponding or pooled water which cannot be removed
Inspection of potential mosquito breeding grounds following rain events
Noise and Vibration
Noise levels acceptable Noise impacts on neighbours acceptable Generators, compressors and other noise generating equipment located away from offices and work areas
Equipment noise/vibration checked and controlled (evidence of pre-start checks)
Erosion/Sediment Control
Erosion/sediment controls are effective and maintained Sediment traps free flowing Silt fencing/rubble in good repair Drainage free of erosion and debris No visible sediment plumes in discharge or rock placement areas Sediment and erosion controls cleaned so at least 60% capacity of the control is maintained Following rainfall events, performance of erosion and sediment control devices and the quality of runoff leaving the site will be inspected and recorded
Water Quality
Release of contaminants from stormwater discharge points to water comply with Temperature, TSS, pH, Total Hydrocarbons, DO limits and metals on Curtis Island Petroleum Facility Licence as
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Revision 003
monitored prior to discharge or daily during discharge events throughout construction. Adequate records of monitoring available. Disturbed areas and stormwater drainage channels inspected Daily inspections for stormwater management after major rainfall
Acid Sulphate Soils
Material excavated from PASS areas to be tested to confirm the presence of ASS (monitoring results available)
Reburial of PASS occurring within 12 hours of exposure
Waste
Appropriate segregation of waste Waste oil kept in bunded area for removal by licensed recycling contractor Sufficient waste/recycling facilities provided and being used correctly Waste register maintained and up to date
Item
Acc
epta
ble
Nee
ds
Imp
rove
men
t N/A
Act
ion
R
equ
ired
Refuelling/Hazardous Materials/Contamination
Visual inspection of refuelling Visual inspection of storage facilities Inspection of spill kits (placement and stocking) Site Spill Register up to date Fuel, oil, degreasers stored within impervious bunded areas, complying with AS1940 Storage tanks are bunded, capacity of bund at least 110% of single largest tank volume or 100% of largest tank volume plus 10% of second largest tank volume in a multiple storage area
Drum storage bunded, with bund capacity is at least 25% of maximum design storage volume Hazardous materials adequately contained and clearly labelled Hazardous storage area clearly signposted Corrosive substances stored in accordance with AS3780 Spill kits for oil/fuel spills to both land and water are present nearby to high risk activities on the worksite
Details of all chemicals on site maintained in Hazardous Substances Register MSDS available on site for all materials held Equipment free of oil leaks Water surfaces free of oil sheen
Air Quality
Visual monitoring of dust emissions – dust is at acceptable level Equipment exhaust/fumes emissions controlled Contamination measures appropriate for weather Construction vehicle access is on sealed or stabilised roads
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Revision 003
Actions Required
Pro
pos
ed
Com
ple
tion
D
ate
Per
son
R
esp
onsi
ble
Act
ual
C
omp
leti
on
Dat
e
Inspector Signature: _____________________________
HSSE Manager Reviewed Inspection Checklist HSSE Manager Signature: _____________________________
Copy of Inspection Checklist issued to Contractor
All actions have been closed out on Corrective Action Register – Checklist can be filed
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Revision 003
Attachment E – Seawater Intake and Outfall System
Operating Plan
Electronic documents, once printed, are uncontrolled and may become outdated.
Security Level 2 - Bechtel Confidential © Copyright Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals, Inc. 2011-2012. All rights reserved.
25566-100-G01-GHX-00086 Revision 003
Attachment F – Seawater Intake and Outfall System
Operations Risk Assessment