Download - Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16
![Page 1: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entanglement
APS March MeetingPittsburgh, 2009 March 16
I. Ramsey interferometry and cat states
II. Quantum information perspectiveIII. Beyond the Heisenberg limit
IV. Two-component BECs
Appendix. Quantum metrology and resources
Carlton M. CavesUniversity of New Mexico
http://info.phys.unm.edu/~cavesQuantum circuits in this presentation were set using the LaTeX package Qcircuit, developed at the University of New Mexico by
Bryan Eastin and Steve Flammia. The package is available at http://info.phys.unm.edu/Qcircuit/ .
![Page 2: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Herod’s Gate/King David’s PeakWalls of Jerusalem NP
Tasmania
I. Ramsey interferometry and cat states
![Page 3: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Ramsey interferometry
N independent “atoms”
Frequency measurementTime measurementClock synchronizationShot-noise limit
![Page 4: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Cat-state Ramsey interferometry
J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, D. J. Wineland, and D. J. Heinzen, Phys. Rev. A 54, R4649 (1996).
Fringe pattern with period 2π/N
N cat-state atoms
It’s the entanglement, stupid.
Heisenberg limit
![Page 5: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
II. Quantum information perspective
Cable BeachWestern Australia
![Page 6: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Heisenberg limit
Quantum information version of
interferometryShot-noise
limit
cat stateN = 3
Fringe pattern with period 2π/N
![Page 7: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Cat-state interferometer
Single-parameter estimation
State preparation Measurement
![Page 8: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Heisenberg limit
S. L. Braunstein, C. M. Caves, and G. J. Milburn, Ann. Phys. 247, 135 (1996).V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, PRL 96, 041401 (2006).
Generalized uncertainty principle
(Cramér-Rao bound)
Separable inputs
![Page 9: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Achieving the Heisenberg limit
cat state
![Page 10: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Is it entanglement?
It’s the entanglement, stupid.
But what about?
We need a generalized notion of entanglement that includes information about the physical situation, particularly the relevant Hamiltonian.
![Page 11: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
III. Beyond the Heisenberg limit
Echidna Gorge Bungle Bungle Range
Western Australia
![Page 12: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Beyond the Heisenberg limitThe purpose of theorems in
physics is to lay out the assumptions clearly so one
can discover which assumptions have to be
violated.
![Page 13: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Improving the scaling with N
S. Boixo, S. T. Flammia, C. M. Caves, and JM Geremia, PRL 98, 090401 (2007).
Metrologically relevant k-body
coupling
Cat state does the job. Nonlinear Ramsey interferometry
![Page 14: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Improving the scaling with N without entanglement
S. Boixo, A. Datta, S. T. Flammia, A. Shaji, E. Bagan, and C. M. Caves, PRA 77, 012317 (2008).
Productinput
Productmeasurement
![Page 15: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
S. Boixo, A. Datta, S. T. Flammia, A. Shaji, E. Bagan, and C. M. Caves, PRA 77, 012317 (2008); M. J. Woolley, G. J. Milburn, and C. M. Caves, arXiv:0804.4540 [quant-ph].
Improving the scaling with N without entanglement. Two-body couplings
![Page 16: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Improving the scaling with N without entanglement. Two-body couplings
S. Boixo, A. Datta, M. J. Davis, S. T. Flammia, A. Shaji, and C. M. Caves, PRL 101, 040403 (2008).
Super-Heisenberg scaling from nonlinear dynamics, without any
particle entanglement
Scaling robust against decoherence
![Page 17: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Pecos WildernessSangre de Cristo RangeNorthern New Mexico
IV. Two-component BECs
![Page 18: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Two-component BECs
![Page 19: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Two-component BECs
Different spatial wave functions
J. E. Williams, PhD dissertation, University of Colorado, 1999.
![Page 20: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Two-component BECs
Different spatial wave functions
Renormalization of scattering strengths
Let’s start over.
![Page 21: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Two-component BECs
Renormalization of scattering strengths
Different spatial wave functions
![Page 22: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Two-component BECs
Two-body elastic losses
Imprecise determination of N
? Perhaps ?With hard, low-dimensional trap
![Page 23: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Cape HauyTasman Peninsula
Appendix. Quantum metrology and resources
![Page 24: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Making quantum limits relevant
The serial resource, T, and the parallel resource, N, are
equivalent and interchangeable, mathematically.
The serial resource, T, and the parallel resource, N, are
not equivalent and not interchangeable, physically.
Information science perspective
Platform independence
Physics perspectiveDistinctions between different
physical systems
![Page 25: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Making quantum limits relevant. One metrology story
A. Shaji and C. M. Caves, PRA 76, 032111 (2007).
![Page 26: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
One metrology story
![Page 27: Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement APS March Meeting Pittsburgh , 2009 March 16](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110104/56815f63550346895dce558c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
One metrology story