![Page 1: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Quality, Profit, and the Public GoodTensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education
Kevin KinserDepartment of Educational Administration and Policy Studies
University at Albany
State University of New York
![Page 2: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Quality
• Standard– Pre-defined criteria: Implicit or explicit
• Measurement– Data collection and reporting
• Assessment– Judgment: what is good
![Page 3: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Quality Assurance
• External evaluation• Community norms• Public confidence
• Who is evaluating?• Whose norms?• Which public?
Quality Insurance?
![Page 4: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Profit
• Revenue – Expenses = Surplus
• Fee-based, unsubsidized = Private
• Shareholder/owner compensation = Profit
Distinction: Home or Cross-Border location?
![Page 5: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Public Good
• Higher education should contribute to the realization of significant public ends (Kezar, et al, 2005)
• Benefits accrue to society as a whole
• Contemporary Challenges– expanding private sector, privatization– economic, competitiveness rationale
Public benefits in a global market?
![Page 6: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Endemism
• Natural to or characteristic of a specific place
• Belonging to a particular people or country
• Restricted or peculiar to a locality or region
• Prevalent in a specific field, area, or environment
![Page 7: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Organizational Endemism
• Organizations are embedded in a physical location and uniquely situated to thrive within its context
• Relationship between the geopolitical environment and the organization– structures, associations, and economic
conditions connected with a particular region
Adapted from Lane & Kinser, 2008
![Page 8: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Endemic Higher Education
• Higher education has traditionally been geographically focused and state supported
• Borders are important– define the boundaries of institutional service
– define the scope of political sponsorship
• Legally, economically, and culturally linked to their native geopolitical environment.
![Page 9: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Non-Endemic Academics
• Higher education operating outside of its geopolitical home base
• Requires adaptation to the new environment
• Tests resiliency of existing systems and procedures (e.g., quality assurance)
Cross-border activity
Invasive or Cultivar?
![Page 10: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Endemic Quality Assurance
• Place of origin matters
• Establish trust in the source
• Regulate the delivery
• Importing higher education– Acceptable, creditable, valuable
• Exporting higher education– Protection of the national “brand”
![Page 11: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Cross-Border Models
• Branch campus• Foreign ownership• Curriculum supply
• Joint venture• Distance education• Partnerships
Ubiquitously private, increasingly for-profit
![Page 12: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
U.S. Case: Regulatory Triad
• Federal oversight: Accountability
• State registration: Approval
• Accreditation review: Quality Assurance– voluntary– non-governmental– multiple agencies
![Page 13: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
U.S. “Domestic” Cross-Border
• Each state represents a distinctive regulatory environment
• Endemic higher education the norm– Public, private, for-profit institutions typically
operate in a single state
• Relatively permeable borders– U.S. Constitution Commerce clause
• Non-endemic is a private activity
![Page 14: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
U.S. Non-endemic examples
• Public– Troy University: 8 fed, 15 states; SACS– University of Toledo: 1 fed, 1 state; HLC
• Private– Webster University: 1 fed, 20 states; HLC– Western Governors Univ: 1 fed, 48 states; NW, DETC
• For-profit– Strayer University: 60 fed, 15 states; MSA– Kaplan College/Univ: 33 fed, 20 states; HLC, ACICS,
ACCSCT, DETC
![Page 15: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Quality Confusion
• Triad pressured by non-endemic higher education– States serve as inconsistent regulators
• limited control of exporting
• variable oversight of importing
– Multiple accreditation options provide conflicting standards; compliance concerns
– Feds unconcerned with locations
![Page 16: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Why Private Matters
• Control separated from geography
• Financial incentives and market pressures encourage expansion
• Public good competes with private benefit
• Quality assurance as operating expense– Argument for legitimacy
![Page 17: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
“A generalized perception or assumption that the actions of an entity are desirable, proper, or appropriate within some socially constructed system of norms, values, beliefs, and definitions.” (Suchman, 1995)
Quality and Legitimacy
![Page 18: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
“A generalized perception or assumption that the actions of an entity are desirable, proper, or appropriate within some socially constructed system of norms, values, beliefs, and definitions.” (Suchman, 1995)
Quality and Legitimacy
![Page 19: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
“A generalized perception or assumption that the actions of an entity are desirable, proper, or appropriate within some socially constructed system of norms, values, beliefs, and definitions.” (Suchman, 1995)
Quality and Legitimacy
![Page 20: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
“A generalized perception or assumption that the actions of an entity are desirable, proper, or appropriate within some socially constructed system of norms, values, beliefs, and definitions.” (Suchman, 1995)
Quality and Legitimacy
![Page 21: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
International Implications
• Permeable borders encourage non-endemic activity
• Public institutions not distinctive from private, for-profit
• Borders remain barriers to state oversight• Endemic quality assurance may not adequately
address non-endemic functions• Even in a robust regulatory environment, non-
endemic institutions can control the process
![Page 22: Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062511/551becb0550346af588b6474/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Conclusion