![Page 1: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and
Requisite VarietyStuart A. Umpleby
The George Washington University
Washington, DC
![Page 2: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
A model of social change using four methods for describing systems
Ideas
Variables Groups
Events
![Page 3: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Designing conceptual systems
• Architecture students are taught to “think with your pencil”
• If one wants to design theories, philosophies, or social movements, how does one “think with one’s pencil”?
• Quadrant diagrams are one possibility
![Page 4: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The purposes of quadrant diagrams
• Bring order to a variety of points of view
• Compare personalities, fields of study, cultures, policies, strategies
• Show how organizations or countries or fields of study change
• Add a new dimension to a previous analysis
![Page 5: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Rules for making quadrant diagrams
• To conform with common time series graphs, put earlier positions in the lower left quadrant and later positions in the upper right quadrant
• To conform with an optimistic outlook, put less desirable conditions in the lower left quadrant and more desirable conditions in the upper right quadrant
![Page 6: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Quadrant diagrams as a way of clarifying a variety of positions
![Page 7: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Attitudes toward participation in planning
Technology is good
Technology is bad
Participation is good
political scientists left wing campus activists
engineers advocates of planning via networked computers
Participation is bad
![Page 8: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Quadrant diagrams in the field of management and business
![Page 9: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
High taskorientation
Low taskorientation
Low people orientation
The “managerial grid”
High people orientation
![Page 10: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Independentactivities
Interdepend-ent activities
Competition
Negative sum
Conflict Collaboration
Cooperation
Working relationship taxonomy, Turner
Positive sum
![Page 11: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Task oriented
Growth oriented
incubator
guided missile Eiffel Tower
family
Heterarchy
A taxonomy of corporate cultures
Hierarchy
![Page 12: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Distributedfacilities
One, centrallocation
Transnationalfirms
Single market
Global firms Internationalfirms
Multinationalfirms
Approaches to international management, Miroshnik
Multiple markets
![Page 13: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
High Income
Low Income
Cash Cow
Low Growth
Dog Problem Child
Star
Boston Consulting Group portfolio management
High Growth
![Page 14: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Growth companies
Value companies
Low capitalization High capitalization
Financial portfolio management
![Page 15: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
High complexity
Low complexity
Few connections
Normal accidents
The causes of “normal accidents”
Many connections
![Page 16: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Quality Improvement Priority Matrix
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Importance - % saying "very important"
Per
form
ance
- %
say
ing
"poo
r"
Computer Resources
Faculty Advisors
Classroom Projectors
Academic Advisors
Int'l. St. Orienta.
Course Info.
Classroom Appearance
![Page 17: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Quadrant diagrams in the field of futures research and forecasting
![Page 18: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Low y2kimpact
High y2kimpact
Let the long boom roll
No major economic calamity or terrorist event
Y2k whammy Double whammy
From out of the ball park
Possible y2k outcomes, Marien
Major economic calamityor terrorist event
![Page 19: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
IsolatedFailure
WidespreadMultipleFailures
Don’t worry, be happy
Intense but isolated efforts of business and government
Big blame game begins
We did our best
Egg-on-facefalse alarm
Possible Y2K actions and outcomes, Marien
Major, globallycoordinated mobilization
![Page 20: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Isolatedfailures
Interdepend-ent failures
Fire in the theater
Social chaos
Millennial collapse
Community andhuman spirit
Official future
Social response to y2k outcomes, Carmichael
Social cohesion
![Page 21: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Rules HeuristicsRemove ambiguity Allow ambiguity
Means of controlling or directing system
Organizing Futures Research Methods
MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL
COMPLEXITY COMPLEXITY
Agent Modeling Causal Layered Analysis
Interactive Scenarios
Structural Analysis Field Anomaly Relaxation
Decision Modeling
ENGINEERING SYSTEMS
APPROACHES THINKING
Relevance Trees Cross-Impact Analysis
Trend Impact Analysis
Technology Sequence Analysis
Statistical Modeling Scenarios Multiple Perspectives Concept
Strategic Analysis Tools Strategic Diagnosis
Simulation and Games
Text Mining
Environmental Scanning Normative Forecasting
Des
ign
Em
erge
nce
Stan
d ou
tsid
e sy
stem
Thr
ough
Int
erac
tions
of
agen
ts
Nat
ure
of p
ossi
ble
unde
rsta
ndin
g of
sys
tem
![Page 22: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Quadrant diagrams in sociology and political science
![Page 23: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Sociologyof radicalchange
Sociology ofregulation
Radical humanist
Subjective
Interpretive Functionalist
Radical structuralist
Four paradigms of social theory, Burrell and Morgan
Objective
![Page 24: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Welfare state
Selfreliance
Western EuropeIn 1960s
Convergence of capitalist and socialist societies
Central planning Free markets
Socialist countriesIn 1950s
United Statesin 1920s
![Page 25: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Democracy
Totalitar-ianism
Perhaps Japan
Russia
Central planning
Stalinist system
China
Some third world countries
Western democracies
Two paths toward a mixed economy
Free markets
![Page 26: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Generating additional systems or strategies
Strong authority with openness (schools)
glasnost
Strong authority with secrecy (USSR)Distrust
nationalities disputes
Distrust with equality (international system)
Assume equality of opportunityAssume differences in capability
DemocracyTrust
![Page 27: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Strong government
Weak government
Few government services Many government services
USA
intended path
USSR
Underdeveloped countries
actual path
Developing, socialist countries
Fukuyama's additional dimension
![Page 28: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Quadrant diagrams in understanding the evolution of science
![Page 29: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Coherence conception of knowledge
Second order cybernetics Social construction of reality
German Idealism Vienna CircleRepresentation conception of knowledge
Knowledge as an individual activity Knowledge as an group activity
Two Paths to a Similar Outcome
![Page 30: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Normal Science
Incommensurable Definitions
CorrespondencePrinciple
Revolutionary Science
The Dialectics of Science
![Page 31: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Author First Order Cybernetics
Second Order Cybernetics
Von Foerster
Pask
VarelaUmpleby
Umpleby
The cybernetics of observed systemsThe purpose of a modelControlled systemsInteraction among the variables in a systemTheories of social systems
The cybernetics of observing systems The purpose of a modelerAutonomous systemsInteraction between observer and observedTheories of the interaction between ideas and society
Definitions of First and Second Order Cybernetics(An example of incommensurable definitions)
![Page 32: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
The Correspondence Principle
• Every new theory should reduce to the old theory to which it corresponds for those cases in which the old theory is known to hold
• All the evidence that supported the old theory also supports the new theory
• The principle requires adding a new dimension previously not considered
![Page 33: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
New philosophy of science
Old philosophy of science
Amount of attention paid to the observer
An Application of the Correspondence Principle
![Page 34: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Why quadrant diagrams are useful
• Quadrant diagrams are a way of creating a meta-analysis
• They are a way of thinking abstractly about a large number of special cases
• They focus attention on a few, ideally most important, dimensions
• They help a regulator (manager) achieve requisite variety
![Page 35: Quadrant Diagrams, Levels of Conceptualization and Requisite Variety Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d135503460f949e7eac/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Presented at a symposium organized by the
Washington Evolutionary Systems Society
within a meeting of the
Washington Academy of Sciences
held at the National Science Foundation
Arlington, VA, March 25-26, 2006