Download - PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
![Page 1: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The attraction of celebrities
![Page 2: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Learning objective
To be able to explain psychological explanations of Celebrity Worship and Stalking
PASSING INTENSE
INTEREST WORSHIP
![Page 3: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Who do you consider to be a ‘celebrity’? List at least 10 people.
• Who is your favourite celebrity? Why?
• What characteristics are displayed by celebrities?
• What have they done to be famous?
![Page 4: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
What is a celebrity?A celebrity is a famous, widely-recognised person who commands a high degree of public and media attention. It has been said that they are well known just for being well known.
The rise of celebrity culture is linked to massive growth of reality TV – in particular Big Brother.
![Page 5: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
National Children’s Day Poll 2008
Who is the most famous person in the world?
Simon Cowell!
![Page 6: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Social Psychological explanations
Pathological view:
AbsorptionAddiction
Model
Attachment styles
Positive/healthy view:
Jenkins Positive Action view
![Page 7: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Parasocial Relationships• Relationships with
celebrities are usually entirely one-sided.
• The target individual is unaware of the existence of the person who created the relationship.
• These relationships may be appealing because they make few demands, and the individual does not run the risk of criticism or rejection as might be the case in a real relationship.
![Page 8: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
PSRs are more likely if….
• The TV characters perceived as attractive
• We perceive them as similar to us
• We perceive them as real
• If the viewer is female• The viewer is lonely
and shy
![Page 9: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Celebrity Attitude Scale
1. Entertainment-Social: talk with friends about celebrities/gossip.
2. Intense-Personal: intensity of feelings for celebrities. Can become an obsession.
3. Borderline-Pathological: potentially harmful aspects of feelings for celebrities. Can lead to uncontrollable behaviours e.g. stalking.
![Page 10: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Entertainment socialThis 10-items scale measures the social aspect associated with the celebrity worship such as discussion with friends and shared experiences. i.e. My friends and I like to discuss what X has done.
![Page 11: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The intense personal sub-scale
This nine items scale measures the intensity of a person’s feelings towards the celebrity along with obsessional tendencies such as “ I consider X to be my soul mate”.
![Page 12: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The borderline psychological sub-scale
This four item scale measures the potentially harmful aspects of feelings towards the celebrity i.e. “ if X asked me to do something illegal as a favour I would probably do it”
![Page 13: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Absorption Addiction Model
McCutcheonPSR’s compensate for ‘defects or lacks’ within their own lives.Allows an escape from reality.
Most fans stay at level 1Fans with a weaker sense of personal identity or poor adjustment may “absorb” themselves in a celebrity’s life to gain a stronger sense of identity.PSR are addictive so increasing sense of involvement with the celebrity is needed.
![Page 14: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Absorption Addiction ModelThis model therefore
predicts that there will be an association between poorer mental health and the strength of parasocial relationships.
To test this McCutcheon Devised (CAS) Celebrity Attitude Scale
Celebrity Attitude Scale Measures 23 attitudes on celebrities.PSR’s into three levels.These can be stages; a person can move up the levels.
![Page 15: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Maltby et al. (2001)Ps: UK students (126 males+181 females)Completed 23 item CAS and mental health questionnaire measuring depression, anxiety and social dysfunction
Ps on level 1 had some degree of social dysfunction, experienced loneliness in real life.Ps on level 2 scored highly on anxiety and depression.Could not test for level 3 as mental health questionnaire did not include items on serious problems with adjustment.
![Page 16: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Maltby et al. (2001) evaluation
Correlational
studyEthics
Use of
questionnaires
![Page 17: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Evaluation of PSR• Support?• Challenge?• Are PSR really dysfunctional?• Benefits of PSR• Are PSR real?
![Page 18: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Pathological (2) view of PSR’s
Attachment styles and Parasocial Relationships
• Theory proposes insecure attachment leads to an increased interest in celebrities.
• PSRs make no demands, and do not involve criticism or the risk of rejection.
![Page 19: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Attachment styles and Parasocial Relationships
It is thought that those who can be needy and clingy in relationships may be more likely to develop PSRs.
This type of attachment style is known as insecure-resistant (anxious ambivalent)
![Page 20: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Attachment style and PSRs• Most likely to form PSRs• They have concern that others will not reciprocate their
desire for intimacy. They turn to TV characters to satisfy their “unrealistic and often unmet relational needs”
Anxious-ambivalent
• Least likely• They find it difficult to develop relationships and therefore
are very unlikely to seek them from real or fictional people.
Anxious avoidant
• Not likely• Often have satisfactory real-life relationships and do not
seek as additional relationship with a celebrity.
Secure attachment
![Page 21: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Support: Cole and Leets 1999
Those with an insecure resistant attachment style turn to tv characters as a means of satisfying their ‘unrealistic and often unmet’ relational demands
![Page 22: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
McCutchon (2006)Tested 3 hypothesis1. Adults with insecure
attachment are more likely to become attached to celebrities than those with a secure adult attachment type.
2. Insecure adults are more likely to agree with/condone stalking and obsessive behaviour towards celebrities.
3. There is a correlation between stalking and pathological tendencies towards attachment to celebrities.
• Sample: 299 students (age 16-42)
• Procedure:used celebrity attitude scale and a stalking scale.Measured adult attachment using a relationship questionnaireMeasured childhood attachment type through the use of a parental bonding scale based on their recall of the relationship with their parents before the age of 16.
![Page 23: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
McCutchon (2006): Findings
There was no relationship between insecure attachment and the tendency to form PSR with celebrities.
Those with insecure attachment types were more likely to think that stalking was acceptable and there was a relationship between pathological attachment and the tendency to stalking. Therefore insecure attachment is a predisposing factor
![Page 24: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
McCutchon (2006): Evaluation
Correlational
studyEthics
Use of questionnaires
Use of
retrospective data
![Page 25: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
THE POSITIVE/ACTIVE VIEW
Jenkins & Jenson (1992)Parasocial relationships serve an important function:Fans enhance lives by taking active & positive roleCreate social networks (fan clubs)Fans develop sense of appreciation of others people’s talents
Evaluation
Chamberlain et al (2008) examined idea that due to social power and status celebrities received more favourable treatment. However no differences found and social impact of celeb may be less than imaginedRichins (1994) individuals identified celebrities to construct their self-concepts and identities
![Page 26: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
StalkingStalking is obsessive behaviour focused on
an individual which is unwanted and creates fear in the victim. Most victims of stalking are not celebs.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ALYijG7s7s&feature=related
Meloy (1999) suggests that ‘private’ stalking there has been a relationship between the victim and stalker; in ‘public’ stalking the victim is a public figure such as a celebrity.
![Page 27: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Kienlen (1998) – Stalking and Insecure Attachment
TypesPREOCCUPIED STALKER
Poor self image; constantly seeking approval from others’ Stalking results from real or imagined rejection and is an attempt to restore a positive sense of self
FEARFULSTALKER
Poor self image, but sees others as unsupportive and unreliable. Stalking is a result wanting someone to boost self image but rejecting them because of a lack of trust. Stalking is a way of boosting self image.
DISMISSINGSTALKER
Is distant and aloof from others in order to maintain an inflated self image. When relationships fail this person may stalk out of revenge
![Page 28: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Support for Attachment Theory of Stalking
• Kienlen et al (1997) – studied records of 25 stalkers & found disrupted childhood attachment and loss of an important relationship in the 6mths prior to stalking
• Lewis et al (2001) found that stalkers have traits typical of insecure attachment such as ambivalent attitudes to those they have relationships with and emotional instability.
![Page 29: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
• McCutcheon et al (2006) 266 university students, measured correlations between insecure attachment style and attachment to celebrities and tendency to condone celebrity stalking. Found that insecure attachment types more likely to condone celebrity stalking and are more likely to form parasocial relationships. NB – this is only a predisposing factor.
![Page 30: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Relational Goal Pursuit Theory of Stalking
Based on the assumption that people desire relationships so if the ‘goal’ of having a relationship is thwarted people will engage in extra effort to achieve it. If people have been rejected they magnify the importance of the relationship goal. This leads to thoughts and feelings which further magnify their efforts.
.
![Page 31: PsychExchange.co.uk Shared Resource](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060118/558c227fd8b42a9b2e8b462c/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Attaining a relationship is a lower-order goal linked to a higher-order goal (e.g. happiness/improved self worth) and will be pursued in spite of resistance and obstacles. Failure to attain the lower-order goal and exaggerated belief in the consequences of goal failure leads to rumination and excessive pursuit is rationalised and belief in the ability to attain the celebrity relationship is reinforced.
Attaining a relationship is a lower-order goal linked to a higher-order goal (e.g. happiness/improved self worth) and will be pursued in spite of resistance and obstacles. Failure to attain the lower-order goal and exaggerated belief in the consequences of goal failure leads to rumination and excessive pursuit is rationalised and belief in the ability to attain the celebrity relationship is reinforced