This project has received funding from the
European Union‘s Horizon 2020 research and
innovation programme under grant agreement No 723974.
Progress, Results
WP2: Mapping C-ITS context
08.08.2017
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 208.08.2017
• Task 2.1: Identifying and mapping C-ITS services
• Lead: CE Delft
• Task 2.2: Barriers, enablers and KPIs for implementation of C-
ITS
• Lead: CE Delft
• Task 2.3: Taxonomy of case studies
• Lead: University of Barcelona
Structure of WP2
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 308.08.2017
Planning
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 408.08.2017
Task 2.1: Overview of C-ITS applications
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 508.08.2017
• Assessment of ITS initiatives (macro-level)
• Identification
• Assessment of ITS services (meso-level)
• Identification
• Categorisation
Objectives
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 608.08.2017
• ITS: application of ICT in transport
• C-ITS:
a subset of the overall ITS that communicates and shares information
between ITS stations to give advice or facilitate actions with the
objective of improving safety, sustainability, efficiency and comfort
beyond the scope of stand-alone systems.
• ITS services: combined use of ITS technologies in order to fulfil user
requirements related to a transport mode (or integration of more than
one transport mode) on a certain market.
Definitions
708.08.2017
• 94 ITS services identified• Desk study
• Interviews
• Data gathered on:• Country
• TRL
• ITS key-enabling technology
• Deployment area
• Transport mode
• Type of transport
• Primary benefits
• Type of stakeholders
• Institutional framework
• Transferability
ITS services identified
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 808.08.2017
• Categorisation needs a market driven approach in order to be
alligned with NEWBITS purposes
• Based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) a market
type segmentation was chosen:
• Advanced Traveler Information Systems (ATIS)
• Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS)
• Advanced Transportation Pricing System (ATPS)
• Advanced Public Transportation System (APTS)
• Cooperative vehicle system (CVS)
Categorisation of ITS services
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 908.08.2017
• Long list of criteria was developed based on literature review
• Based on AHP these criteria were ranked based on theirrelevance for NEWBITS purposes
• Top 5:
• Primary benefits
• Type of stakeholders
• Innovation level
• ITS key-enabling technology
• Transferability
• Selection of 4 criteria: primary benefit, innovation level, ITS technology and market segment
Categorisation approach
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 1008.08.2017
• Tabular one-to-one mapping
Mapping of identified ITS services on categories (1)
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 1108.08.2017
• Three dimensional mapping
Mapping of identified ITS services on categories (2)
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 1208.08.2017
Mapping of ITS services: Service types
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 1308.08.2017
Task 2.2: Assessment of barriers,
enablers and KPIs
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 1408.08.2017
• Assessment of barriers and enablers
• Identify main barriers and enablers for the deployment of ITS services.
• Assess the relevance of the barriers and enablers for the different market segments and types of services.
• Explore the impact of external factors (macro-trends) of future relevance of barriers and enablers
• Assessment of KPIs
• Identify main KPIs used for ITS services
• Assess the relevance/usage of KPIs for the different market segments and types of services
• Assess the main barriers for applying the KPIs.
Objectives
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 1508.08.2017
Methodology assessment barriers and enablers
1. Conduct a systematic review of barriers and
enablers
• Literature review
• Interviews
2. Identification of main barriers and enablers
by market segment
4. Exploration of the impact of external factors
on the future relevance of barriers and
enablers
3. Identification of main barriers and enablers
by service type
• Stakeholder survey
• Input from
identified services
in NEWBITS D2.1
• Literature review
Assessment steps Research Method
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 1608.08.2017
Overview of barriers and enablers
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 1708.08.2017
Relevance of barriers
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Existence of the last mover advantage
Lack of a sufficient legal framework
Lack of political prioritisation
Lack of funding
Lack of attractive business models
Current infrastructure not ready to integrate ITS…
Lack of interoperability and incompatibility
Technical weaknesses in ensuring data security
High or uncertain maintenance costs
Lack of user acceptance
Limited understanding of user needs
Lack of cooperation between stakeholders
Lack of skilled staff for ITS companies
Lack of demonstrated benefits of ITS services
No real barriers
Other
Frequency by which barriers are mentioned
Total
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 1808.08.2017
Main barriers per market segment
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 1908.08.2017
Main enablers per market segment
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 2008.08.2017
Service type Important
characteristics
Most relevant barriers
Type 1 TRL 9 Lack of user acceptance
Lack of political prioritisation
Type 2 TRL 7; CVS and ATIS Technical barriers
Lack of user acceptance
Lack of legal framework
Type 3 TRL 7 – 9; efficiency
main primary benefit
Wide range of barriers are relevant
Type 4 TRL 7; CVS Lack of user acceptance
Lack of demonstrated benefits
Lack of legal framework
Current infrastructure not ready
Main barriers per service type
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 2108.08.2017
Service type Important
characteristics
Most relevant enablers
Type 1 TRL 9 Increased user acceptance
More attractive business cases
Type 2 TRL 7; CVS and ATIS More cooperation stakeholders
Legal framework
Involvement of end-users
Type 3 TRL 7 – 9; efficiency
main primary benefit
Wide range of enablers
Type 4 TRL 7; CVS More cooperation stakeholders
Public awareness
Main enablers per service type
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 2208.08.2017
• Increased political commitment:
• due to increased attention sustainable transport, urbanisation,
increase multimodal transport
• More attractive business models:
• due to urbanisation, ageing population
• Improved infrastructure:
• due to emerging technologies (e.g. 5G)
• More user-acceptance
• due to more prominent role generation Y
Impact megatrends on relevance barriers/enablers
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 2308.08.2017
Methodology assessment barriers and enablers
1. Conduct a systematic review of KPIs • Literature review
• Interviews
2. Mapping of KPIs by market segment
4. Assess barriers for the appliance of
KPIs
3. Assess utilisation of relevant KPIs per
service type
• Stakeholder survey
• Input from identified
services in NEWBITS
D2.1
• Literature review
• Stakeholder survey
Assessment steps Research Method
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 2408.08.2017
Main deployment KPIs
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 2508.08.2017
Main benefit KPIs
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 2608.08.2017
• As benefit KPIs are mainly related to the primary objective of
the service
• No clear distinction in benefit KPIs per market segment or
service type can be identified.
Relevant KPIs per market segment or service type
WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 2708.08.2017
Barriers for implementation KPIs
0 5 10 15 20 25
Lack of available/compatible data
Lack of knowledge/skills
Data ownership leading to difficulties in accessing information
Lack of financing/funding
Lack of cooperation between stakeholders
Lack of clearly defined KPIs
Difficulties to realise cooperation (organisational/cultural backgrounds)
Lack of guidance/best practices
Perceived limited added value of KPIs
Data privacy
Other
Lack of staff resources
Frequency by which the barrier is mentioned