-
7/29/2019 Portfolio Management, Security Analysis and Investment Philosophy
1/16
2/22/13 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, SECURITY ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY
pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invphillectures/port.html
RISK PREFERENCES
The trade off between Risk and Return
Most, if not all, investors are risk averse
To get them to take more risk, you have to offer higher expected returns
Conversely, if investors want higher expected returns, they have to be willing to take more risk.
Ways of evaluating risk
Most investors do not know have a quantitative measure of how much risk that they want to take
Traditional risk and return models tend to measure risk in terms of volatility or standard deviation
The Mean Variance View of Risk
In the mean-variance world, variance is the only measure of risk. Investors given a choice between tow investments
with the same expected returns but different variances, will always pick the one with the lower variance.
Estimating Mean and Variance
In theoretical models, the expected returns and variances are in terms of future returns.
In practice, the expected returns and variances are calculated using historical data and are used as proxies for
future returns.
Illustration 1: Calculation of expected returns/standard deviation using historical returns
GE The Home Depot
Year Price at Dividends Returns Price at Dividends Returns
-
7/29/2019 Portfolio Management, Security Analysis and Investment Philosophy
2/16
2/22/13 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, SECURITY ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY
pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invphillectures/port.html 2
end of year during year end of year during year
1989 $ 32.25 $ 8.13
1990 $ 28.66 $ 0.95 -8.19% $ 12.88 $ 0.04 58.82%
1991 $ 38.25 $ 1.00 36.95% $ 33.66 $ 0.05 161.79%
1992 $ 42.75 $ 1.00 14.38% $ 50.63 $ 0.07 50.60%
1993 $ 52.42 $ 1.00 24.96% $ 39.50 $ 0.11 -21.75%
1994 $ 51.00 $ 1.00 -0.80% $ 46.00 $ 0.15 16.84%
Average 13.46% 53.26%
Standard Deviation 18.42% 68.50%
Concept Check:
While The Home Depot exhibited higher variance in returns, much of the variance seems to come from the
stock price going up dramatically between 1989 and 1992? Why is this upside considered risk?
Should risk not be defined purely in terms of "downside" potential (negative returns)?
Variance of a Two-asset Portfolio
mportfolio = wAmA + (1 - wA) mB
s2portfolio = wA2s2A + (1 - wA)
2s2B + 2 wA wB rABsA sB
where
wA = Proportion of the portfolio in asset A
The last term in the variance formulation is sometimes written in terms of the covariance in returns between the two assets, which is
sAB = rABsA sB
The savings that accrue from diversification are a function of the correlation coefficient.
Illustration 2: Extending the two-asset case - GE and The Home Depot
Step 1: Use historical data to estimate average returns and standard deviations in returns for the two investments.
Stock Average Return (1990-94)Standard Deviation (1990-
94)
General Electric 13.46% 18.42%
The Home Depot 53.26% 68.50%
Step 2: Estimate the correlation and covariance in returns between the two investments using historical data.
YearReturns on
GE(RGe)Returns on HD (RH)
(RGE-
Avge(RGE))2
(RH-
Avge(RH))2
(RGE- Avge(RGE)
(RH-Avge(RH)
1990 -8.19% 58.82%0.04686 0.00309 (0.01203)
1991 36.95% 161.79%0.05518 1.17786 0.25494
1992 14.38% 50.60%0.00008 0.00071 (0.00024)
-
7/29/2019 Portfolio Management, Security Analysis and Investment Philosophy
3/16
2/22/13 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, SECURITY ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY
pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invphillectures/port.html 3
1993 24.96% -21.75% 0.01322 0.56265 (0.08625)
1994 -0.80% 16.84%0.02034 0.13265 0.05194
Total0.13568 1.87696 0.20835
Variance in GE Returns = 0.13568/4 = 0.0339 Standard Deviation in GE Returns = 0.0339 0.5= 0.1842
Variance in HD Returns = 1.87696/4 = 0.4692 Standard Deviation in HD Returns = 0.4692 0.5 = 0.6850
Covariance between GE and The Home Depot Returns = 0.20835/4 = 0.0521
Correlation between GE and The Home Depot Returns =rGH = sGH /sG sH = 0.0521/(0.1842*0.6850) = 0.4129
Step 3: Compute the expected returns and variances of portfolios of the two securities using the statistical parameters estimates
above
Consider, for instance, a portfolio composed of 50% in GE and 50% in The Home Depot
Average Return of Portfolio = 0.5 (13.46%) + 0.5 (53.26%) =
Variance of Portfolio = (0.5)2 (18.42%)2 + (0.5)2 (68.50%)2 + 2 (0.5) (0.5) (0.4129)(18.42%)(68.50%) = 1518%
Standard Deviation of Portfolio = 38.96%
From Two Assets To Three Assets to n Assets
The variance of a portfolio of three assets can be written as a function of the variances of each of the three assets,
the portfolio weights on each and the correlationsbetween pairs of the assets. The variance can be written as
follows -
-
7/29/2019 Portfolio Management, Security Analysis and Investment Philosophy
4/16
2/22/13 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, SECURITY ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY
pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invphillectures/port.html 4
sp2= wA
2s2A + wB2s2B + wC
2s2C+ 2 wA wB rABsAsB+ 2 wA wC rACsAsC+ 2 wB wC rBCsBsC
where
wA,wB,wC = Portfolio weights on assets
s2A ,s2
B ,s2
C = Variances of assets A, B, and C
rAB , rAC , rBC = Correlation in returns between pairs of assets (A&B, A&C, B&C)
The Data Requirements
Number of covariance terms = n (n-1) /2
where n is the number of assets in the portfolio
Number of Covariance Terms as a function of the number of assets in portfolio
Number ofAssets
Number ofcovariance terms
2 1
5 10
10 45
20 190
100 4950
1000 499500
Some Closing Thoughts on Risk
Most Investors do not measure their risk preferences in terms of standard deviation
For other investors, risk has to be assessed by using
Scoring Systems (where investors are asked for information or questions to answers which can be used to
analyze how much risk an investor is willing to take)
Risk categories (High; Average; Low)Life cycle theories of investing
A Life Cycle View of Risk
-
7/29/2019 Portfolio Management, Security Analysis and Investment Philosophy
5/16
2/22/13 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, SECURITY ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY
pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invphillectures/port.html 5
General Propositions:
As investors age, there will be a general increase in risk aversion, leading to greater allocation to safer asset classes.
PORTFOLIO VALUE
The value of a portfolio constrains yourchoices at later stages.
This is because trading individual securities creates costs - brokerage costs, bid-ask spreads and price impacThere is a critical mass value, below which it does not pay to actively manage a portfolio - it is far better to
invest in funds.
The larger a portfolio, the more choices become available in terms of assets - this is largely because somecomponents of trading costs - the brokerate costs and the spread - may get smaller for larger portfolios.
If a portfolio becomes too large, it might start creating a price impact which might cause trading costs to start
increasing again.
Taxes do matter: Individuals should care about after-tax returns
Stock and Bond Returns: 1926-1989 - Before and After Taxes
Stocks Bonds
Market Returns $ 534.46 $ 17.30
After Transactions Cost $ 354.98 $ 11.47
After Income Taxes $ 161.55 $ 4.91
After Capital Gains Taxes $ 113.40 $ 4.87
After Inflation $ 16.10 $ 0.69
Transactions Costs: 0.5% a year; Income taxes: at 28%; Capital Gains at 28% every 20 years;
The Effect of Turnover on After-tax Returns
-
7/29/2019 Portfolio Management, Security Analysis and Investment Philosophy
6/16
2/22/13 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, SECURITY ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY
pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invphillectures/port.html 6
CASH NEEDS & TIME FRAME
- What is a long time horizon?
- Determinants of time horizon
* Age
* Level of Income
* Stability of Income
* Cash Requirements
- Time Horizon and Asset Choice
Proposition: The cost of keeping funds in near-cash investments increases with the time horizon of the investor.
-
7/29/2019 Portfolio Management, Security Analysis and Investment Philosophy
7/16
2/22/13 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, SECURITY ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY
pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invphillectures/port.html 7
THE IMPORTANCE OF ASSET ALLOCATION
The first step in all portfolio management is the asset allocation decision.
The asset allocation decision determines what proportions of the portfolio will be invested in different assetclasses.
Asset allocation can be passive,It can be based upon the mean-variance framework
It can be based upon simpler rules of diversification or market value based
When asset allocation is determined by market views, it is active asset allocation.
Passive Asset Allocation: The Mean Variance View of Asset Allocation
Efficient Portfolios
Return Maximization Risk Minimization
Objective Function
Maximize Expected Return Minimize return variance
Constraint
where,
s2 = Investor's desired level of variance
E(R) = Investor's desired expected returns
-
7/29/2019 Portfolio Management, Security Analysis and Investment Philosophy
8/16
2/22/13 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, SECURITY ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY
pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invphillectures/port.html 8
Markowitz Portfolios
The portfolios that emerge from this process are called Markowitz portfolios. These portfolios are consideredefficient, because they maximize expected returns given the standard deviation, and the entire set of portfolios is
referred to as the Efficient Frontier. Graphically, these portfolios are shown on the expected return/standard deviation
dimensions in figure 5.7 -
Figure 5.7: Markowi tz Portfolios
Application to Asset Allocation
If we have information on the expected returns and variances of different asset classes and the covariancesbetween asset classes, we can devise efficient portfolios given any given level of risk.
For example, if the following is the information of 4 asset classes:
Asset Class MeanStandard
deviation
U.S. stocks 12.50% 16.50%
U.S. bonds 6.50% 5.00%
Foreign Stocks 15.00% 26.00%
Real Estate 11.00% 12.50%
Correlation Matrix for Asset Classes
U.S. Stock U.S. Bonds Foreign Stocks Real Estate
U.S. Stocks 1.00 0.65 0.35 0.25
U.S. Bonds 1.00 0.15 -0.10
Foreign Stocks 1.00 0.05
Real Estate 1.00
The More General Lesson: Diversification Pays
-
7/29/2019 Portfolio Management, Security Analysis and Investment Philosophy
9/16
2/22/13 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, SECURITY ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY
pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invphillectures/port.html 9
Passive Asset Allocation: Market Value Based Allocation
Active Asset Allocation: The Market Timers
The objective is to create a portfolio to take advantage of 'forecasted' market movements, up or down. Strategies
could include:
* Shifting from (to) overvalued asset classes to (from) undervalued asset classes if you expect the market to go up
(down).
* Buying calls (puts) or buying (selling) futures on a market if you expect the market to go up (down).
Assumption: You can forecast market movements
Advantage: If you can forecast market movements, the rewards are immense.
Disadvantage: If you err, the costs can be significant.
Does Active Asset Allocation Work?
-
7/29/2019 Portfolio Management, Security Analysis and Investment Philosophy
10/16
2/22/13 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, SECURITY ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY
pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invphillectures/port.html 10
Tactical asset allocation funds do not do well ..
Fairly unsophisticated strategies beat these funds..
-
7/29/2019 Portfolio Management, Security Analysis and Investment Philosophy
11/16
2/22/13 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, SECURITY ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY
pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invphillectures/port.html 1
SECURITY SELECTION
Once the asset allocation decision has been made, the portfolio manager has pick the securities that go into theportfolio.Again, the decision can be made on a passive basis or on active basis.
Active security selection can take several forms:
it can be based upon fundamentals
it can be based upon technical indicatorsit can be based upon information
Passive Security Selection: The Index Fund
Index funds are created by holding stocks in a wider index in proportion to their market value. No attempt is made to
trade on a frequent basis to catch market upswings or downswings or select 'good' stocks.
Assumptions: Markets are efficient. Attempts to time the market and pick good stocks are expensive and do not
provide reasonable returns. Holding a well diversified portfolio eliminates unsystematic risk.
Advantages: Transactions costs are minimal as is the cost of searching for information.
B. Markowitz Portfolio: A Markowitz efficient portfolio is created by searching through all possible combinations o
the universe of securities to find that combination that maximizes expected return for any given level of risk.
Assumptions: The portfolio manager can identify the inputs (mean, variance, covariance) to the model correctly and
has enough computer capacity to run through the optimization exercise.
-
7/29/2019 Portfolio Management, Security Analysis and Investment Philosophy
12/16
2/22/13 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, SECURITY ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY
pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invphillectures/port.html 12
Advantages: If historical data is used, the process is inexpensive and easily mechanised.
Disadvantages: The model is only as good as its inputs.
II. ACTIVE STRATEGIES
The objective is to use the skills of your security analysts to select stocks that will outperform the market, and create
a portfolio of these stocks. The security selection skills can take on several forms.
(1) Technical Analysis, where charts reveal the direction of future price movements
(2)Fundamental Analysis, where public information is used to pick undervalued stocks
(3)Access to pri vate information, which enables the analyst to pinpoint mis-valued securities.
Assumption: Your stock selection skills help you make choices which, on average, beat the market.
Inputs: The model will vary with the security selection model used.
Advantage: If there are systematic errors in market valuation andyour model can spot these errors, the portfolio will
outperform others in the market.
Disadvantage: If your security selection does not pay off, you have expended time and resources to earn whatanother investor could have made with random selection.Security Selection strategies vary widely and can lead to
contradictory recommendations..
Technical investors can be
momentum investors, who buy on strength and sell on weakness
reversal investors, who do the exact oppositeFundamental investors can be
value investors, who buy low PE orlow PBV stocks which trade at less than the value of assets in place
growth investors, who buy high PE and high PBV stocks which trade at less than the value of future
growthInformation traders can believe
that markets learn slowly and buy on good news and sell on bad newsthat markets overreact and do the exact opposite
They cannot all be right in the same period and no one approach can be right in all periods.
A Caveat.. There are not very many great stock pickers either...
-
7/29/2019 Portfolio Management, Security Analysis and Investment Philosophy
13/16
2/22/13 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, SECURITY ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY
pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invphillectures/port.html 13
III. Trading and Execution
The cost of trading includes the brokerage cost, the bid-ask spread and the price impact
The Trade offs on Trading
There are two components to trading and execution - the cost of execution (trading) and the speed of execution
Generally speaking, the tradeoff is between faster execution and lower costs.
For some active strategies (especially those based on information) speed is of the essence.
Maximize: Speed of Execution
Subject to: Cost of execution < Excess returns from strategy
For other active strategies (such as long term value investing) the cost might be of the essence.
Minimize: Cost of Execution
-
7/29/2019 Portfolio Management, Security Analysis and Investment Philosophy
14/16
2/22/13 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, SECURITY ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY
pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invphillectures/port.html 14
Subject to: Speed of execution < Specified time period.
The larger the fund, the more significant this trading cost/speed tradeoff becomes.
MEASURING PERFORMANCE
* Who should measure performance?
Performance measurement has to be done either by the client or by an objective third party on the basis of agreedupon criteria. It should not be done by the portfolio manager.
* How often should performance be measured?
The frequency of portfolio evaluation should be a function of both the time horizon of the client and the investmentphilosophy of the portfolio manager. However, portfolio measurement and reporting of value to clients should be
done on a frequent basis.
* How should performance be measured?
I. Market Indices (No adjustment for risk): There are some who do not like models for risk and return and prefer
comparison to broad market indices (S&P 500, NYSE composite, ..)
The limitation of this approach is that it does not explicitly control for risk. Thus, an advantage is given to risky fundand money managers.
Tracking Error as a Measure of Risk
Tracking error measures the difference between a portfolios return and its benchmark index. Thus portfolios that
deliver higher returns than the benchmark
II. Against other portfolio managers
In some cases, portfolio managers are measured against other portfolio managers who have similar objective
functions. Thus, a growth fund manager may be measured against all growth fund managers.
III. Risk-Adjusted Models
A. The CAPM: The capital asset pricing model provides a simple and intuitive measure for measuring performance. I
compares the actual returns made by a portfolio manager with the returns he should have made, given both marketperformance during the period and the beta of the portfolio created by the manager.
Abnormal Return = Actual Return - Expected Return
> 0: Outperformed
< 0: Underperformed
where,
Actual Return = Returns on the portfolio (including dividends)
Expected Return = Riskfree rate at the start of the period + Beta of portfolio * (Actual return on market during the
period - Riskfree Rate)
This abnormal return is calledJensen's Alpha. It can also be computed by regressing the returns on the portfolio
against a market index, and then comparing the intercept to Rf (1- Beta).
Variants: Define Rp to be the return on the portfolio and Rm to be the return on the market.
-
7/29/2019 Portfolio Management, Security Analysis and Investment Philosophy
15/16
2/22/13 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, SECURITY ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY
pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/invphillectures/port.html 15
Treynor Index = (Rp - Rf)/ Beta of the portfolio
> (Rm - Rf) : Outperformed
< (Rm - Rf) : Underperformed
Sharpe Index = (Rp - Rf)/ Variance of the portfolio
> (Rm - Rf)/sm : Outperformed
< (Rm - Rf)/sm : Underperformed
Information Ratio = Jensens alpha / Unsystematic Risk
> 0: Outperformed the market
< 0 : Underperformed
Tracking Error as a Measure of Risk
Tracking error measures the difference between a portfolios return and its benchmark index. Thus portfolios
that deliver higher returns than the benchmark but have higher tracking error are considered riskier.
Tracking error is a way of ensuring that a portfolio stays within the same risk level as the benchmark index.It is also a way in which the active in active money management can be constrained.
Performance Attribtion
This analysis can be carried one step forward, and the overall performance of a money manager can be decomposed
into market timing and security selection components.
If money managers are good market timers,
they should hold high beta stocks, when the the return on the market > risk free rate
they should hold low beta stocks, when the return on the market < risk free rateThus, the market timing capabilities of a money manager can be evaluated by looking at the managers
performance over time relative to the market. For instance, consider the following funds
In some cases, better estimates of market timing can be obtained by fitting a quadratic curve to actual returns.
where c is a measure of the market timing ability of a fund (money manager).
-
7/29/2019 Portfolio Management, Security Analysis and Investment Philosophy
16/16
2/22/13 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, SECURITY ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHY
B. The APT: The arbitrage pricing theory defines the expected return in terms of statistical factors (instead of just the
market as in the CAPM). A beta is defined relative to each factor.
C. Multi-Index Models: Multi-index models allow the performance evaluator to bring in economic factors that may
influence expected returns.
* Window Dressing and other Phenomena that cloud measurement
1. Marking up the merchandise (thinly traded stocks)
2. Tricking the technicians (stocks with breakout points)
3. Playing catch up (Buying hot stocks just before evaluation)
4. Dumping the losers just before evaluation