Return to sport progression: beyond eccentric exercise
Dr Peter Malliaras
Outline
• Stretch shorten cycle • Ra;onale and indica;ons in tendinopathy rehabilita;on
• Evidence • Prac;cal considera;ons and return to sport
Stretch-‐shortening cycle (SSC) = walk, run, jump
SSC components Tendon s;ffness
Force producing capacity
Structural eg fibre type, architecture Neuromuscular eg RFD
Joint and leg s;ffness Sprint / jump performance
Farley 1993, Komi 2000, Roberts 2002, Brughelli 2008, Hobara 2008, 2010, Harrison 2004
• Greater performance – Tendon recoils faster than concentric muscle – Increase EMG – muscle poten;a;on, reflex
• Greater efficiency – Length-‐tension, force-‐velocity – Passive energy -‐ tendon
Finni 2000, Komi 2000, Finni 2006, Hof 1983, 2002, Fenn 1924, 1924b
Stretch-‐shortening cycle (SSC)
SSC and tendinopathy
• Tendinopathy associated with SSC – Sport, posi;on, volume, frequency
• High forces, strain • Loading rate, energy absorp;on
– Influence on tenocytes?
Zwerver 2011, Lian 2005, Malliaras 2008, Ferred 1986
Achilles tendinopathy deficits
• Neuromuscular deficits – Reduced tendon s;ffness
– Reduced rate of force development
– Reduced hopping distance
Wang 2012, Arya 2010, Child 2010
Silbernagel 2007
• Con;nued sport v no sport first 6 weeks
• Con-‐ecc, eccentric, faster-‐power
• Greater drop CMJ & hop quo;ent 6 months
902 Silbernagel et al The American Journal of Sports Medicine
There were significant (P < .05) correlations between theinitial VISA-A-S score and the improvements in VISA-A-Sscore seen at the subsequent evaluations: 0 to 6 weeks,r = –.292; 0 to 3 months, r = –.470; 0 to 6 months, r = –.459;and 0 to 12 months, r = –.756.
The same significant (P < .05) correlations were seenwhen comparing the initial pain level with hopping and theimprovements seen in pain level at the subsequent evalua-tions: 0 to 6 weeks, r = –.498; 0 to 3 months, r = –.591; 0 to6 months, r = –.681; and 0 to 12 months, r = –.823.
There were no significant correlations between the dura-tion of symptoms and the change in VISA-A-S score orchange in pain level with hopping at any of the evaluations.
DISCUSSION
This randomized study could not demonstrate any nega-tive effects from allowing the patients to continue Achillestendon-loading activity (such as running and jumping)when using the pain-monitoring model during rehabilita-tion for Achilles tendinopathy.
Furthermore, this randomized treatment study confirmsearlier results that strengthening exercises of the Achillestendon, gastrocnemius, and soleus muscle complex causesignificant improvements in symptoms and muscle-tendonfunction in patients with Achilles tendinopathy.5,21,26,36,41
Historically, in the literature, initial rest from pain-provoking activity has been recommended for Achillestendinopathy,7,30,42 but it appears that this might not benecessary. The patients in this study could safely continuewith their activity of choice as long as they followed thepain-monitoring model. The pain-monitoring model statesthat exercise activity that does not cause pain above 5 of
10 on a VAS is safe. Because most of the patients withAchilles tendinopathy are middle-aged, physically activeindividuals, the allowance of continued exercise activitymay have positive effects on their general health and qual-ity of life. Also, athletes with Achilles tendinopathy wouldpotentially benefit from being able to continue their sportsactivity in order to avoid significant deterioration in sport-ing performance. As in the present study, Visnes et al45 alsoallowed continued physical activity during treatment intheir study on athletes with patellar tendinopathy. Theycould not, however, show any positive effect of eccentrictraining when elite volleyball players with patellartendinopathy continued their normal in-season training.No physical activity-monitoring model, such as the pain-monitoring model used in the present study, was used byVisnes et al45; this might explain the lack of improvement.
It cannot be excluded in the present study that the lackof treatment differences found between the 2 treatmentgroups for the functional secondary outcome evaluationsrepresents a type II error. The power calculation made wasfor the primary and not for the secondary outcomes. Thus,no definite conclusions can be drawn from the results forthe functional evaluations.
The literature states that Achilles tendinopathy mostlyoccurs in middle-aged men. In our study, as well in others, itcan be seen that there is a change over the years in the per-centage of women included. In the often-cited study byKvist,14 it was reported that 89% of the patients withAchilles tendinopathy were men. In a review of several morerecent treatment studies, the percentage of women wasbetween 14% and 55%, with the higher percentages seen inthe later studies.4-7,21,24,27,29-31,38 Because previous studies onAchilles tendinopathy include both men and women, we alsoincluded both men and women in the present study. At thetime we planned the study, we did not expect to have as highas 50% women and did not expect that there would be aneed for controlling the ratio between men and women ineach group to get an equal number. Even though there are 7women in the exercise training group and 11 women in theactive rest group, there is no significant difference in thenumber of women in the 2 treatment groups. However, werecognize that the numbers are low and the chance to detecta difference with statistics is small. Further, statisticalanalysis comparing the 4 groups (women and exercise train-ing, women and active rest, men and exercise training, menand active rest) on the main outcome (change in VISA-A-Sscore) using the Kruskal-Wallis test did not show any sta-tistical differences between the groups. We acknowledgethat gender could be a confounding factor; however, we haveno indication that this factor has affected the outcome of thepresent study. Therefore, we do not believe that the validityof our results is affected by the ratio of men and women inthe different treatment groups.
Even though our results appear similar to earlier stud-ies on the effect of exercise on Achilles tendinopathy,direct comparisons between treatment studies are diffi-cult to make because of variations in outcome meas-ures.5,21,26,36,41 The VISA-A-S questionnaire, used in thepresent study, measures important aspects of the
Figure 1. Mean VISA-A-S scores with 95% confidence inter-val, at 0 and 6 weeks and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month evaluations.VISA-A-S, Swedish version of the Victorian Institute of SportsAssessment–Achilles questionnaire.
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 w 6 w 3 m 6 m 12 mV
ISA
-A-S
sco
re
Exercise Active rest
at Kings College London - ISS on January 14, 2010ajs.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Patellar tendinopathy deficits
• Greater jump height – Precede and aier pain onset if ac;ve
• Less peak quadriceps torque (uni vs controls, bi) • Less peak jumping power, work
Cook 2004, Lian 2003, Visnes 2013
Crossley 2007
Bisseling 2007
Clinical presenta;on varies
Landing strategy
• Ver;cal vs horizontal – Higher PT force
• Previous PT, asymptoma;c – eg less PF, knee flexion spike jump landing
– eg less hip flexion stop jump
Edwards 2010, 2010b, 2013, Bisseling 2008
loading the patellar tendon compared with duringvertical landings.Ankle dorsiflexion was significantly less during the
horizontal landing phase compared with verticallanding phase. Malliaras et al. (2006) cautionedthat reduced ankle dorsiflexion range during landingmay increase the risk of developing patellar tendino-pathy by limiting the range of motion over which theankle joint plantar flexor muscles can act, in turn,causing the knee and hip extensor groups to have tocontribute more to this force dissipation (Kovacset al., 1999). The limited dorsiflexion range of move-ment combined with the lower ankle dorsiflexionvelocity displayed by the participants during thehorizontal landing phase may have contributed tothe higher patellar tendon load compared with thatsustained during the vertical landing phase.
In comparison to this study, similar (Yu et al.,2004, 2006; Chappell et al., 2005; Sell et al., 2006;Herman et al., 2008) and varied (Yu et al., 2006)values have been reported previously for knee andhip joint angles during the horizontal landing phaseof the stop-jump movement. Several studies havesuggested that increased knee flexion during landingwas a strong predictor of patellar tendinopathy,whereby athletes with patellar tendinopathy landedwith more knee flexion at initial contact (Richardset al., 1996) and at the time of the FV (Bisseling et al.,2007; Bisseling et al., 2008). It was hypothesized thatlanding with more knee flexion might not onlycontribute to the higher patellar tendon forceobserved in the horizontal landing phase, but as thepatellar tendon is oriented anteriorly at knee flexionangles 4601 (DeFrate et al., 2007), it may also leadto greater compression of the posterior aspect of thepatellar tendon against the patella (Toumi et al.,2006). Greater compression of the patellar tendonhas been suggested to be a cause of proximal patellartendinopathy (Almekinders et al., 2002; Hamilton &Purdam, 2004). We speculate that landing withgreater hip flexion during the horizontal landingphase may potentially add to this compression asthe total body center of mass would be located moreposterior to the base of support, creating a greaterhorizontal shear force at the knee joint (Fig. 6). As aresult of these compressive forces, patellar tendonadaptation may occur in the form of increasing theamount of fibrocartilage, which is known to resistcompressive and shear forces (Benjamin & Ralphs,1998). It is thought this tendon adaptation may be atthe expense of tissue that resists tensile loading,which may, in turn, decrease load tolerance andultimately overload of the patellar tendon (Hamilton& Purdam, 2004).Despite the significantly lower FV in the horizontal
landing phase, the FPT was significantly greaterrelative to during the vertical landing phase. TheFPT is derived by dividing the knee joint moment bythe patellar tendon moment arm. Knee joint mo-ments are calculated via a complex equation incor-porating both the kinetics and kinematicscharacterizing the lower limb during the landingaction (Winter, 1990). In the present study, varia-tions in the patellar tendon moment arm could notexplain between-phase di!erences in the FPT as theparticipants displayed similar amounts of knee jointflexion at FPT during the two landing phases (Herzog& Read, 1993). Therefore, the significantly higherknee joint moment was attributed to the significantlyhigher FPT found in the horizontal landing phase(Fig. 2). We speculate that the higher knee jointmoment was primarily due to the direction of thevector of the resultant ground reaction force, whichcreated a larger knee joint moment arm by increasing
Fig. 6. Lower limb alignment during the horizontal andvertical landing phases of a stop-jump movement at initialfoot-ground contact (IC) and at the time of the peak patellartendon force (FPT). Note the more posterior direction of thevertical ground reaction force vector and the altered tibialalignment during the horizontal landing phase comparedwith the vertical landing phase.
Patellar tendon loading during landing
7
Systematic review of AT & PT Loading programs
Limited evidence that eccentrics are superior to other loading
Malliaras et al 2013
Alfredson Stanish &Curwin
Silbernagel HSR
Type of exercise
Eccentric Eccentric-concentric Faster eccentric-concentric
Eccentric-concentric Eccentric Faster eccentric-concentric Balance exercise Plyometric
Eccentric-concentric
Sets, reps 3x15 3x10-20 Various 4 x 15 to 6
Frequency Twice daily Daily Daily 3x/week
Progression Load Speed then load Volume Type of exercise
Load
Pain Enough load to achieve up to moderate pain
Enough load to be painful in third set
Acceptable if within defined limits
Acceptable if was not worse after
Sports Medicine Systema;c Review, Malliaras et al 2013
Clinical SCC loading
• Romero-‐Rodriguez 2011 – n=10, 50% ac;ve in sport – Patellar tendinopathy – Improved VISA 86% – No increase jump height
• Flywheel training, eccentric cycling – Increased leg spring s;ffness
Elmer 2011
SSC training • Jumping
– Ver;cal – Forward – Hurdle – Drop jumps 20-‐70cm step
• Power training – Squat jumps
• Bounding
What can SSC rehabilita;on offer?
• Increased rate force development (RFD) – Burgess 2007, Kyrolainen 2005, Kubo 2007, Wu 2009
• Improved jump performance – Burgess 2007, Kyrolainen 2005, kubo 2007, Houghton 2013, Foure
2009, Taube 2012, Wu 2009
Tendon s;ffness • Inconsistent outcomes
– Increases (e.g. Wu 2009, Burgess 2007)
– No change (e.g. Kubo 2007, Houghton 2013)
• No change aier walking, running programs (e.g. Hansen 2003, Kubo 2008)
Tendon s;ffness
• Burgess 2007 – Warm up then 60-‐80 maximal drop jumps – 2 sessions/week, 6 weeks = 840 jumps
• Kubo 2007 – Warm up then 50 drops jumps, 20cm – 4 sessions/week, 12 weeks = 2400 jumps
Resistance versus SSC
• 12 weeks of resistance training vs plyometric training
– Tendon s;ffness increased with weight training
– Jump performance increased with plyometrics
Kubo 2007, Markovic 2007
Copyright @ 200 by the American College of Sports Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.7
Electromyographic activity. The electromyographicactivity (EMG) was recorded during the measurements ofthe maximal voluntary isometric strength, tendonproperties, and jump performances. Bipolar surfaceelectrodes (5 mm in diameter) were placed over the belliesof MG, LG, SOL, and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles with aconstant interelectrode distance of 25 mm. The electrodeswere connected to a preamplifier and differential amplifierwith a bandwidth of 5 Hz to 500 Hz (model 1253A, NECMedical Systems, Tokyo, Japan). The EMG signals weretransmitted to a computer at a sampling rate of 1 kHz. TheEMG was full-wave rectified and averaged for the durationof the contraction (mEMG). During the jumping tests, themEMG values from MG, LG, SOL, and TAwere calculatedfrom the prelanding (defined as 100 ms preceding landing),eccentric and concentric phases, respectively, according tothe ankle joint angle. In addition, the mean of mEMG in theMG, LG, and SOL was defined as the mEMG of plantarflexors. During the measurements of tendon properties, themEMG of TA was measured to investigate the antagonistmuscle activity of TA (coactivation level). To determine themaximal activation of TA, a maximal dorsiflexion isometriccontraction was performed at the same angle (90- of anklejoint). We normalized the mEMG value of TA with respectto the mEMG value of TA at the same angle when acting asan agonist at maximal effort.
Statistics. Descriptive data included means T SD. Atwo-way ANOVA with repeated-measures [2 (groups) ! 2(test times)] was used to analyze the data. The F ratios formain effects and interactions were considered significant atP G 0.05. Significant differences among means at P G 0.05were detected using a Tukey post hoc test.
RESULTS
The muscle volumes of the plantar flexor musclesincreased significantly 4.9 T 2.3% for PT (P = 0.003) and5.4 T 2.8% for WT (P = 0.002), respectively (Table 1). Nosignificant difference in the relative increase of musclevolume was found between PT and WT (P = 0.379). Therewere no significant differences in the relative increase in themuscle volume among MG, LG, and SOL (Fig. 1).Furthermore, no significant change in the Achilles tendonCSA was found between both the protocols (Table 1).
The MVC value increased significantly by 17.3 T 21.7%for PT (P = 0.017) and 19.3 T 13.6% for WT (P = 0.003),respectively (Table 1). There was no significant differencein the relative increase of the MVC value between the twoprotocols (P = 0.818). The activation level of the plantarflexor muscles assessed by superimposing electrical stimuliincreased significantly by 5.6 T 6.6% for PT (P = 0.019)and 5.8 T 8.2% for WT (P = 0.049), respectively (Table 1).No significant change in the coactivation level was foundafter training for PT (P = 0.771) and WT (P = 0.549),respectively (Table 1). Although the twitch torque valueand the rate of torque development did not change for both
the protocols, the time to peak torque shortened signifi-cantly for PT (P = 0.011) but not for WT (P = 0.499)(Table 1).
Both protocols produced no significant differences in thetendon-elongation values at any force-production levelsafter training (Fig. 2). The maximal tendon elongation andelastic energy increased significantly for PT (tendonelongation P = 0.031, elastic energy P = 0.044), but notfor WT (tendon elongation P = 0.374, elastic energy P =0.681) (Table 1). The relative increases in the maximaltendon elongation and elastic energy were greater for PTthan for WT (tendon elongation P = 0.032, elastic energy
FIGURE 3—The relative changes in the jump height of SJ, CMJ, andDJ for plyometric and weight training protocols. The relative increasesin the SJ, CMJ, and DJ heights were significantly greater for PT thanfor WT. ** P G 0.01; *** P G 0.001.
http://www.acsm-msse.org1806 Official Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine
APP
LIED
SCIENCES
Pathology changes
• Less fluid flow response with loading – Aggrecan
• Reduced s;ffness aier resistance training
• Neuromuscular adapta;on more realis;c
Grigg 2012 , Docking 2013
Kongsgaard 2010
Indica;ons for specific SSC?
• Con;nued sport possible for some • Quick return to sport within season
– Inseason management of symptoms – Return to sport criteria? Pain, training capacity
• Spectrum of presenta;ons clinically – Pain / confidence – Kinema;cs eg poor eccentric control, s;ff knee – Performance eg hop distance
Hop kinema;cs Hop distance
Low intensity • Pain • Motor paperns • Endurance • Jumps • Hops – Achilles ++ • Box
Landing strategy
• Replicate landing
e.g. block jump landing • Land on toes • Soi landing
• Hip flexion difficult in volleyball
Eric MacLean A Theoretical Review of Lower Body…
3
for executing effective lower body plyometric training. The conclusions stated in this work, and the biomechanical points identified, can be applied to understanding the biomechanics of lower body plyometrics, as the primary movement pattern of lower body plyometric training is the multi-jointed squat position; an action that utilizes the triple flexion / extension of the ankles, knees and hips to generate force production and high power outputs (2,7). Figure 1 represents the ‘athletic position’. This position is achieved when there is lower extremity bilateral symmetry, and equal body weight distribution across all joints and limb segments. Mastery of this position is granted only when it can be maintained in static and lateral movement patterns. It is this position which acts as the basic start and landing position for all two legged jumps.
Figure 1 – The Athletic Position in Triple Flexion
The athlete in Figure 1 is attempting to
highlight the key biomechanical points outlined in the literature associated with force production and power output. These key points include the feet being shoulder or slightly greater than shoulder width apart, the knees remaining posterior to the distal aspect of the feet, where the feet are oriented in the sagittal plane, in line with the patella, where the centre of the patella does not drift past the lateral aspect of the foot. Feet must remain forward with an angular displacement from the midline of the shank no greater than 10o-15o, with hip flexion at approx 90o (1).
The stated biomechanical limb positions are suggested based on the following collection of reported findings related to force production, power output, and decreased risk of injury.
While active in bounding, hopping, or jumping movements, either single or double legged, deep knee flexion during the eccentric phase of the movement, and complete triple extension of the
ankles, knees and hip should be encouraged during the concentric phase of the movement, as illustrated in Figure 2. These joint position recommendations are given as the factors established as being major determinants of vertical jump performance; force developed from the hip, knee and ankle joints, and the rate of force development produced by these muscles (3), and the neural control of the movement (2).
However, before the particulars of the concentric, explosive phase of the movement is discussed, the eccentric, force and power producing flexion aspect of the jump must be analyzed.
Figure 2 – Concentric phase of a Medicine Ball jump squat.
Escamilla et al reported that, greater forward knee movements during the descent (eccentric) phase of the squat are shown to increase knee shear forces (1). This is important biomechanical error to consider in relation to performing plyometric exercises, as the speed at which the movements take place are purposefully quick, and as such creates an element of instability. Further, several studies have reported significant greater tibiofemoral shear and compressive forces during a fast squat cadence (1). Escamilla et al report that the fast decent rate of a squat movement requires greater deceleration forces from the knee and hip extensors in order to slow down and stop the body system (body plus added resistance) at the bottom of the decent (1). If the athlete is in poor biomechanical alignment, the unequal distribution of these forces has the potential to increase the magnitude of the compressive forces to the stabilizing structures of the knee joint; namely the bursa, medial and lateral meniscuses, or collateral and cruciate ligaments. It is the unequal distribution of these compressive forces which have the strength to create myotendinous or joint capsule injury.
Chmielewsky 2006, Flanagan 2008
Landing challenges
• Stop jump – eg basketball
• Proximal kine;c chain
Performance
• Minimise hysteresis – <25ms contact ;me
• Progress intensity but not at expense of speed
• Single leg • Ver;cal • Forward • Hurdle
Chmielewsky 2006, Flanagan 2008
When to start?
• Stable pain, but present • Reasonable kinema;cs • Side to side isolated & compound strength
– Leg extension – Leg press – Calf raise
How to progress?
• Start asap
• Every 2-‐3 days -‐ tenocytes? pain? • Pain / endurance – 5-‐10 mins • Motor paperns – 5x10 • Performance – 5x10, 5x5
– Stable pain before progressing
Isometric Kine;c chain
Isometrics for load Concentric-‐eccentric – isolated Concentric-‐eccentric – compound Eccentric?
Hopping Landing Running
Performance -‐hops -‐cudng -‐sprint
Sport à
Return to sport = stable pain, strength, motor paperns, performance à
Summary
• Limited evidence for SSC rehab – Look for individual indica;ons
• No evidence on return to sport criteria – Pain, strength, movement paperns, performance
• Achilles – low intensity, endurance • Patellar – motor paperns
Twi$er: @DrPeteMalliaras
Case 1 • A young talented player
with symptoms in the patella tendon (on and off pain during warm up or aier training, beper during ac;vity) during the preseason training
• what to do? • con;nue training? adjust
training? add treatment?
Modify training based on pain response What are the deficits? Address these in parallel
Case 2 • A very important player
during season experience increasing symptoms (pain and stiffness in the morning) in the Patellar Tendon weeks before an important match
• What to do ?? Modify load Isometrics High volume injection Other eg heel wedges, tape
Case 3 • One of your players
experiences sudden onset of pain in the inser;onal Achilles tendon during training but only during high loading.
• What to do ? Imaging Clinical signs of tear? Fascia crura