Download - Outline of Reviewers
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
1/21
UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF LAW
1st Semester 2006-07
POLITICAL LAW
Prof. H. Harry L. Roque, Jr.
I. SCOPE & HISTORY
Political Law, definedVicente G. Sinco,Philippine Political Law (p.1)
The Constitution & Constitutional Law
Sinco, (pp.66-77)
Constitutional HistoryVicente V. Mendoza,From McKinleys Instructions to the New Constitution (pp.1-53)
Cesar Adib Majul, The Political & Constitutional Ideas of the Philippine Revolution, (pp.177-205)Sinco, (pp. 78-108)
The 1935 Constitution
The 1973 ConstitutionAquino v. Enrile, 59 SCRA 183 (1973)Philippine Bar Association v. COMELEC, 140 SCRA 455 (1985)
The 1987 Constitution
Lawyers League for a Better Philippines v. Aquino, G.R. No. 73748, 22 May 1986.
In Re Saturnino Bermudez, 145 SCRA 160 (1986)
De Leon v. Esguerra, 153 SCRA 602 (1987)
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
Francisco v. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 160261 (Nov. 10, 2003) Angara v. Electoral Tribunal, 63 Phil., 139 (1936)
II. THE CONCEPT OF STATE
The Concept of State
Sinco, (pp.3-16)
Elements of a State:
a. People
ART. IV
i. CitizensART. IV, 1
R. A. No. 9139
Moy Ya Lim Yao v. Commission on Immigration, 41 SCRA 292 (1971)
In Re Application for Admission to the Bar of Vicente Ching, 316 SCRA 1 (1999)
In Re Florencio Mallare, 59 SCRA 45 (1974)
Aznar v. COMELEC, 185 SCRA 703 (1990)
ii. Natural-born Citizens
ART. IV, 2
Co v. House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal, 199 SCRA 692(1991)
1
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
2/21
Bengzon III v. House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal, 357 SCRA 545 (2000)
iii. Loss and ReacquisitionART. IV, 3
R. A. No. 8171
Bengzon III v. House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal, 357 SCRA 545 (2000)
Labo v. COMELEC, 176 SCRA 1 (1989)
Frivaldo v. COMELEC, 257 SCRA 727 (1996)Valles v. COMELEC, 337 SCRA 543 (2000)Yu v. Defensor-Santiago, 169 SCRA 364 (1989)
Republic v. Guy, 115 SCRA 244 (1982)
Jao v. Republic, 121 SCRA 358 (1983)
iv. Effect of Marriage
ART. IV, 4
v. Dual AllegianceART. IV, 5
Mercado v. Manzano, 307 SCRA 630 (1999)
b. Territory
Art. II
Merlin M. Magallona, A Primer in International Law in Relation to Philippine Law (pp.79-88);Merlin M.
Magallona, A Primer on the Law of the Sea (1997)
c. Government
i. Definition
E. O. No. 292, 2(1),(2),(4), & (10)
ii. De Jure and De Facto governmentsCo Kim Chan v. Valdez Tan Keh, 75 Phil. 113 (1945)
In Re Saturnino Bermudez, 145 SCRA 160 (1986)
In Re Letter of Associate Justice Reynato Puno, 210 SCRA 589 (1992)
Estrada v. Desierto, 353 SCRA 452 (2001)
Constituent and Ministrant functionsACCFA v. CUGCO, 30 SCRA 64 (1969)
iii. Parens PatriaeGovernment of the Philippine Islands v. Monte de Piedad, 35 Phil. 728 (1916)
d. Sovereignty
Sinco,supra (pp.17-30)Co Kim Cham v. Valdez Tan Keh, 75 Phil. 113 (1945)
Macariola v. Asuncion, 114 SCRA 77 (1992)
Ruffy v. Chief of Staff, 37 Phil. 875 (1946)
Peralta v. Director of Prisons, 75 Phil. 285 (1945)
Alcantara v. Director of Prisons, 75 Phil. 749 (1945)
State Immunity
2
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
3/21
Art. XVI, 3
i. Characterization of Suit
Begosa v. Chairman, Philippine Veterans Administration, 32 SCRA 466 (1970)
Republic v. Feliciano, 148 SCRA 424 (1987)
ii. Rationale for Immunity
Sanders v. Veridiano, 162 SCRA 88 (1988)United States v. Guinto, 182 SCRA 644 (1990)The Holy See v. Rosario, 238 SCRA 524 (1994)
iii. Waiver of Immunity
Act No. 3083
C.A. No. 327, as amended by P.D. No. 1445
Sayson v. Singson, 54 SCRA 282 (1973)Republic v. Purisima, 78 SCRA 470 (1977)
Amigable v. Cuenca, 43 SCRA 360 (1972)Ministerio v. City of Cebu, 14 SCRA 464 (1971)
Santiago v. Republic, 87 SCRA 294 (1978)
Lim v. Brownell, 107 Phil. 344 (1960)United States v. Ruiz, 136 SCRA 487 (1985)
Republic v. Villasor, 54 SCRA 84 (1973)
iii. Suits Against Government Agencies
Philippine National Railways v. IAC, 217 SCRA 401 (1993)
National Irrigation Administration v. Fontanilla, 194 SCRA 486 (1991)
Social Security System v. Court of Appeals, 120 SCRA 707 (1983)
iv. Suability vs. Liability
Merritt v. Government of the Philippine Islands, 34 Phil. 311 (1916)
III. GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE
i. Separation of Powers
Springer v. Government of Phil. Islands, 277 U.S. 189 (1928)
Angara v. Electoral Commission, 63 Phil. 139 (1936)
ii. Non-delegation Doctrine
Pelaez v. Auditor General, 15 SCRA 569 (1965)
United States v. Ang Tang Ho, 43 Phil. 1 (1922)
People v. Rosenthal, 68 Phil. 328 (1939)
Ynot v. Intermediate Appellate Court, 148 SCRA 659 (1987)
Rodriguez v. Gella, 92 Phil. 603 (1953)Araneta v. Dinglasan, 84 Phil. 368 (1949)
Chiongbian v. Orbos, 285 SCRA 253 (1995)
People v. Dacuycuy, 173 SCRA 90 (1989)
iii. Amendments & Revision
Gonzales v. COMELEC, 21 SCRA 774 (1967)
Tolentino v. COMELEC, 41 SCRA 702 (1967)
Javellana v. Executive Secretary, 50 SCRA 30 (1973)
Occena v. COMELEC, 104 SCRA 1 (1981)Almario v. Alba, 127 SCRA 69 (1984)
3
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
4/21
Proposal
ART. XVI, 1
Gonzales v. COMELEC, 21 SCRA 774 (1967)
Direct Proposal
ART. XVI, 2
Defensor-Santiago v. COMELEC, 270 SCRA 106 (1997)
Constitutional Convention
ART. XVI, 3
Tolentino v. COMELEC, 41 SCRA 702 (1967)
Plebiscite Requirement
ART. XVI, 4
IV. FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES & STATE POLICIES
i. Democracy and Republicanism
ii. Renunciation of War as Instrument of National Policy
Lim v. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 151445, 11 April 2002
iii. The Incorporation Clause
Lim v. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 151445, 11 April 2002
Secretary of Justice v. Lantion, 322 SCRA 160 (2000)
Lasco v. United Nations Revolving Fund for Natural Resources, 241 SCRA 681 (1995)
iv. Civilian Supremacy
Integrated Bar of the Philippines v. Zamora, 338 SCRA 81 (2000)
v. Protection of the People
vi. Separation of Church and State
vii. Independent Foreign Policy
viii. Freedom from Nuclear Weapons
BAYAN v. Executive Secretary, 342 SCRA 449 (2000)
ix. Promotion of Social Justicex. Respect for Human Rights
xi. Recognition of the Sanctity of Family Life
Silva v. Court of Appeals, 275 SCRA 604 (1997)
Hernandez v. Court of Appeals, 320 SCRA 76 (1999)
xii. Recognition of the Role of the Youthxiii. Recognition of Fundamental Equality Before Law
Philippine Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. NLRC, 272 SCRA 596 (1997)
xiv. Advancement of the Right to a Balanced and Healthful Ecology
Oposa v. Factoran, 224 SCRA 792 (1993)
C & M Timber Corporation v. Alcala, 273 SCRA 402 (1997)
xv. Priority to Education, Science & Technology, Arts, Culture and SportsGuingona v. Carague, 196 SCRA 221 (1991)
xvi. Affirmation of Labor as Primary Social Economic Force
4
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
5/21
xvii. Self-Reliant and Independent National Economy
Tanada v. Angara, 272 SCRA 18 (1997)
xviii. Indispensable Role of Private Sector
xix. Promotion of Rural Development and Agrarian Reformxx. Recognition and promotion of Rights of Indigenous Cultural Communities
xxi. Role of Non-Governmental Organizationsxxii. Recognition of the Vital Role of Communication and Information
xxiii. Autonomy of Local Governmentsxxiv. Guarantee of Equal Access to Opportunities for Public Servicexxv. Honesty and Integrity in the Public Service
xxvi. Policy of Full Public Disclosure
Chavez v. Public Estates Authority, G.R. No. 133250, 9 July 2002
V. THE LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT
The Nature of Legislative Power
Composition and Qualifications
ART. VI, 2
ART. VI, 5(1) (2)R. A. No. 7941
Veterans Federation Party v. COMELEC, 342 SCRA 244 (2000)Ang Bagong Bayani-OFW Labor Party v. COMELEC,359 SCRA 698 (2001)
Bengson III v. House of Representatives electoral Tribunal, 357 SCRA 545 (2001)
Romualdez-Marcos v. COMELEC, 248 SCRA 300 (1995)
Coquilla v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 151914, 31 July 2002Domino v. COMELEC, 310 SCRA 546 (1999)
Tobias v. Abalos, 239 SCRA 106 (1994)
Mariano v. COMELEC, 242 SCRA 211 (1995)
Term of Office
ART. VI, 4ART. VI, 7
Policy Against Gerrymandering
ART. VI, 5(3)
Ceniza v. COMELEC, 95 SCRA 763 (1980)Equitable Representation
ART. VI,
Rule on Vacancies
Salaries
PHILCONSA v. Mathay, 18 SCRA 300 (1966)
Parliamentary Immunities
Martinez v. Morfe, 44 SCRA 22 (1972)
Osmena v. Pendatun, 109 Phil. 863 (1960)Jimenez v. Cabangbang, 17 SCRA 876 (1966)
People v. Jalosjos, 324 SCRA 689 (2000)
Full Disclosure & Conflict of InterestART. VI, 12
5
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
6/21
Incompatible & Forbidden Offices
ART. VI, 13
Adaza v. Pacana, 135 SCRA 431 (1985)
Practice of Law & Financial Interest
ART. VI, 14
Puyat v. De Guzman, 113 SCRA 33 (1982)
Arroyo v. House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal, 246 SCRA 384 (1995)
Sessions
ART. VI, 15
Officers of the Congress
ART. VI, 16(1)
Defensor-Santiago v. Guingona, 298 SCRA 756 (1998)
Quorum RequirementART. VI, 16(2)
Avelino v. Cuenco, 82 Phil. 17 (1949)
Power to Control Proceedings
ART. VI, 16(3)
Osmena v. Pendatun, 109 Phil. 863 (1960)Defensor-Santiago v. Sandiganbayan, 356 SCRA 636 (2001)
People v. Jalosjos, 324 SCRA 689 (2000)
Vera v. Avelino, 77 Phil. 192 (1946)
Paredes v. Sandiganbayan, G. R. No. 118364, 10 August 1995
The Journal and the Enrolled Bill Doctrine
ART. VI, 16(4)
United States v. Pons, 34 Phil. 729 (1916)
Mabanag v. Lopez Vito, 78 Phil 1 (1947)Casco Philippine Chemical Co. v. Gimenez, 7 SCRA 374 (1963)
Astorga v. Villegas, 56 SCRA 714 (1974)
Morales v. Subido, 27 SCRA 131 (1969)Arroyo v. De Venecia, 277 SCRA 268 (1997)
Adjournments
ART. VI, 16(5)
The Electoral Tribunals
ART. VI, 17
ART. VI, 19
Angara v. Electoral Commission, 63 Phil. 139 (1936)
Bondoc v. Pineda, 201 SCRA 792 (1991)Guerrero v. COMELEC, 336 SCRA 458 (2000)
Abbas v. Senate Electoral Tribunal, 166 SCRA 651 (1988)
Suanes v. Disbursing Officer of the Senate, 81 Phil. 818 (1948)
Lazatin v. House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal, 168 SCRA 391 (1988)Garcia v. House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal, 352 SCRA 353 (1999)
The Commission on Appointments
ART. VI, 18ART. VI, 19
Daza v. Singson, 180 SCRA 496 (1989)
6
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
7/21
Coseteng v. Mitra, Jr., 187 SCRA 377 (1990)
Guingona, Jr. v. Gonzales, 214 SCRA 789 (1992)
Inquiries in Aid of Legislation
ART. VI, 21
Arnault v. Nazareno, 87 Phil. 29 (1950)
Arnault v. Balagtas, 97 Phil. 358 (1955)
Bengzon, Jr. v. Senate Blue Ribbon Committee, 203 SCRA 767 (1991)
The Question Hour
ART. VI, 22
Power to Declare Existence of State of War
ART. VI, 23(1)
Emergency Powers
ART. VI, 23(2)
The Origination Clause
ART. VI, 24Tolentino v. Secretary of Finance, 235 SCRA 630 (1994)
Tolentino v. Secretary of Finance, 249 SCRA 628 (1995)
Alvarez v. Guingona, Jr., 252 SCRA 695 (1996)
The General Appropriations Clause
ART. VI, 25
i. Riders
ART. VI, 25(2)
Garcia v. Mata, 65 SCRA 517 (1975)
ii. Transfer of Funds
Demetria v. Alba, 148 SCRA 208 (1987)PHILCONSA v. Enriquez, 235 SCRA 506 (1994)
Gonzales v. Macaraig, Jr., 191 SCRA 452 (1990)
Title & Subject of Bills
ART. VI, 26(1)
Central Capiz v. Ramirez, 40 Phil. 883 (1920)
Tio v. Videogram Regulatory Board, 151 SCRA 208 (1987)
Lidasan v. COMELEC, 21 SCRA 497 (1967)
Tobias v. Abalos, 239 SCRA 106 (1994)
Procedure for Passage of Law
ART. VI, 26(2)
Tolentino v. Secretary of Finance, 249 SCRA 628 (1995)Tolentino v. Secretary of Finance, 325 SCRA 630 (1994)
Effectivity of Laws
Tanada v. Tuvera, 136 SCRA 27 (1985)Tanada v. Tuvera, 146 SCRA 446 (1986)E. O. No. 200(1987)
Presidential VetoART. VI, 27
Gonzales v. Macaraig, Jr., 191 SCRA 452 (1990)
7
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
8/21
Philippine Constitution Association v. Enriquez, 235 SCRA 506 (1994)
Bengzon v. Drilon, 208 SCRA 133 (1992)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Court of Tax Appeals, 185 SCRA 329 (1990)
Aspects of Power to Appropriate
i. Uniform and Equitable System of Taxation
ART. VI, 28(1)
ii. Progressive System of TaxationART. VI, 28(1)
Tolentino v. Secretary of Finance, 249 SCRA 628 (1995)iii. Authority to Delegate Tariff Rates
Garcia v. Executive Secretary, 211 SCRA 219 (1992)
iv. Exemptions from Taxation
Tolentino v. Secretary of Finance, 249 SCRA 628 (1995)
Tolentino v. Secretary of Finance, 325 SCRA 630 (1994)
Centeno v. Villalon-Pornillos, 326 SCRA 197 (1994)
Abra Valley College, Inc. v. Aquino, 162 SCRA 106 (1988)Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Court of Appeals, 298 SCRA 83 (1998)
v. Vote Required for Grant of Exemption
Limitations on Use of Public Funds
ART. VI, 29
Manosca v. Court of Appeals, 252 SCRA 142 (1996)
Requirement for Increase in Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court
ART. VI, 30
First Lepanto Ceramics, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 237 SCRA 519 (1994)Fabian v. Desierto, 295 SCRA 470 (1998)
Prohibition Against Grant of Title of Royalty or Nobility
ART. VI, 31
Initiative and Referendum
ART. VI, 32
Garcia v. COMELEC, 237 SCRA 279 (1994)
VI. THE EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT
ART. VII, 1
Marcos v. Manglapus, 177 SCRA 668 (1989)
Philippine Constitution Association v. Enriquez, 235 SCRA 650 (1994)
Pimentel v. Aguirre, 336 SCRA 201 (2000)
Laurel v. Garcia, 187 SCRA 797 (1990)Beltran v. Makasiar, 167 SCRA 393 (1988)
Qualifications
ART VII, 2
The Vice-President
ART. VII, 3
Term Limits
ART. VII, 4
8
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
9/21
How Elected
ART. VII, 4
Defensor-Santiago v. Ramos, 253 SCRA 559 (1996)
Oath
ART. VII, 5
ProhibitionsART. VII, 6
Rules on Succession
ART. VII, 7-11
Estrada v. Desierto, 353 SCRA 452 (2001)Resolution on the Motion for Reconsideration, 356 SCRA 108 (2001)
Multiple Office & Other Activities
ART. VII, 13
Civil Liberties Union v. Executive Secretary, 194 SCRA 317 (1991)
Resolution on the Motion for Reconsideration dated 1 August 1991
Dela Cruz v. Commission on Audit, G.R. No. 138489, 29 November 2001.
Prohibited Appointments
ART. VII, 13
Appointments by Acting President
ART. VII, 14
Midnight Appointments
ART. VII, 15
De Rama v. Court of Appeals, 353 SCRA 94 (2001)
In Re Appointment of Valenzuela, 298 SCRA 408 (1998)
The Appointments Clause
ART. VII, 16
Sarmiento v. Mison, 156 SCRA 549 (1987)Bermudez v. Torres, 311 SCRA 733 (1999)
Manalo v. Sistoza, 312 SCRA 239 (1999)Calderon v. Carale, 208 SCRA 254 (1992)
Ad Interim Appointments
ART. VII, 16
Matibag v. Benipayo, G.R. No. 149036, 2 April 2002
Executive Control and The Take Care Clause
ART. VII, 17
Mondano v. Silvosa, 97 Phil. 143 (1955)
Villena v. Secretary of the Interior, 67 Phil. 451 (1939)
Buklod ng Kawaning EIIB v. Executive Secretary, 360 SCRA 718 (2001)
Ang-Angco v. Castillo, 9 SCRA 619 (1963)Lacson-Magallanes Co., Inc. v. Pano, 21 SCRA 895 (1967)
De Leon v. Carpio, 178 SCRA 457 (1991)
Commander-in-Chief Powers
9
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
10/21
ART. VII, 18
Integrated Bar of the Philippines v. Zamora, 338 SCRA 81 (2000)
Lacson v. Perez, 357 SCRA 756 (2001)Ruffy v. Chief of Staff, 75 Phil. 875 (1946)
Aquino v. Military Commission No.2, 63 SCRA 546 (1975)Olaguer v. Military Commission No.34, 150 SCRA 144(1987)
Pardoning PowerART. VII, 19
People v. Casido, 269 SCRA 360 (1997)
People v. Patriarca, Jr., 341 SCRA 464 (2000)
Monsanto v. Factoran, Jr., 170 SCRA 190 (1989)
Sabello v. DECS, 180 SCRA 623 (1989)Echegaray v. Secretary of Justice, 301 SCRA 96 (1999)
Espuelas v. Provincial Warden of Bohol, 108 Phil. 353 (1960)
Barrioquinto v. Fernandez, 85 Phil. 642 (1949)
Torres v. Gonzales, 152 SCRA 272 (1987)
Borrowing Power
ART. VII, 20
Foreign Affairs Power
ART. VII, 21
Bayan v. Executive Secretary, 342 SCRA 449 (2000)
Commissioner of Customs v. Eastern Sea Trading, 166 SCRA 533 (1989)
Secretary of Justice v. Lantion, 343 SCRA 377 (2000)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. John Gotamco & Sons, Inc., 148 SCRA 36 (1987)
Power over Budget
ART VII, 22
Opening AddressART VII, 23
VII. THE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Judicial Power
ART VII, 1
Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803)
Manila Electric Co. v. Pasay Transportation Co, 57 Phil. 600 (1932)
Grave Abuse of Discretion
Garcia v. Board of Investments, 191 SCRA 288 (1990)Daza v. Singson, 180 SCRA 496 (1989)
Prudential Considerations
Ashwander v. TVA, 297 U.S. 288 (1936), Brandeis, j. (concurring)People v. Vera, 65 Phil. 58 (1937)
Matibag v. Benipayo, G.R. No. 149036, 2 April 2002
Soriano v. Estrada, G.R. Nos. 146528, 146549, 146579, 146631, 26 February 2001.
i. Actual Case or Controversy
Cruz v. Secretary of Natural Resources, Mendoza, j. (concurring), 347 SCRA 128 (2000)
10
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
11/21
ii. Political Questions
Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 82 S. Ct. 691, 7 L. Ed. 2d 663 (1962)Casibang v. Aquino, 92 SCRA 642 (1979)
Tanada v. Cuenco, 100 Phil. 1101 (1957)Sanidad v. COMELEC, 73 SCRA 333 (1976)
Abueva v. Wood, 45 Phil. 612 (1924)
Integrated Bar of the Philippines v. Zamora, Puno, j. (concurring), 338 SCRA 121-136 (2000)Estrada v. Desierto, 353 SCRA 452 (2001)
ii. Standing
Joya v. PCGG, 225 SCRA 568 (1993)
Kilosbayan v. Morato, 246 SCRA 540 (1995)Integrated Bar of the Philippines v. Zamora, 338 SCRA 81 (2000)
BAYAN v. Executive Secretary, 342 SCRA 449 (2000)Del Mar v. PAGCOR, 346 SCRA 485 (2000)
Anti-graft League of the Philippines, Inc. v. San Juan, 260 SCRA 250 (1996)
iii. Taxpayers Suit
Pascual v. Secretary of Public Works, 110 Phil. 331 (1960)Telecommunications and Broadcast Attorneys of the Philippines v. COMELEC, 289 SCRA 337 (1998)
Sandoval v. PAGCOR, 346 SCRA 485 (2000)
iv. Ripeness
Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los Angeles, 331 U.S. 549 (1947)
v. Mootness
Gonzales v. Narvasa, 337 SCRA 733 (2000)
Jurisdiction
ART. VIII, 2, 4 & 5.
Mantruste Systems Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 179 SCRA 136 (1989)Firestone Ceramics v. Court of Appeals, 334 SCRA 465 (2000)
Fortich v. Corona, 312 SCRA 751 (1999)Fabian v. Desierto, 295 SCRA 470 (1998)
In Re Cunanan, 94 Phil. 534 (1954)
Echegaray v. Secretary of Justice, 301 SCRA 96 (1999)
In re Integration of the Bar of the Philippines, 49 SCRA 25 (1972)In re Atty. Edillon, 84 SCRA 554 (1978)
Qualifications
ART. VIII, 7
The Judicial and Bar CouncilART. VIII, 8
Appointments to the Judiciary
ART. VIII, 9
Term of Office
ART. VIII, 11
Salary
ART. VIII, 10
Nitafan v. Commission on Internal Revenue, 152 SCRA 284 (1987)
11
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
12/21
Administrative Supervision
ART. VIII, 6
Maceda v. Vasquez, 221 SCRA 464 (1993)
Judge Caoibes, Jr. v. Ombudsman, 361 SCRA 395 (2001)
Power to Discipline
People v. Gaccott, Jr., 246 SCRA 52 (1995)
Fiscal Autonomy
ART. VIII, 3
Prohibition against Administrative Functions
ART. VIII, 12
In re Judge Manzano, 166 SCRA 246 (1988)
Certification RequirementART. VIII, 13
Consing v. Court of Appeals, 177 SCRA 14 (1989)
Substance of Decisions
ART. VIII, 14
Yao v. Court of Appeals, 344 SCRA 202 (2000)Francisco v. Permskul, 173 SCRA 324 (1989)
Valdez v. Court of Appeals, 194 SCRA 360 (1991)
Komatsu Industries Phils, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 289 SCRA 604 (1998)
Period to Decide
ART. VIII, 15
Annual Report
ART. VIII, 16
VIII. THE CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSIONS
Limitations
ART. IX-A, 2
Salary
ART. IX-A, 3
Power to Appoint Employees
ART. IX-A, 4
Fiscal Autonomy
ART. IX-A, 5
Power to Promulgate Rules
ART. IX-A, 6
Aruelo, Jr. v. Court of Appeals, 227 SCRA 311 (1993)
Quasi-Judicial Functions
ART. IX-A, 7
Orocio v. Commission on Audit, 213 SCRA 109 (1992)
Mison v. Commission on Audit, 187 SCRA 445 (1990)
12
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
13/21
Cua v. COMELEC, 156 SCRA 582 (1987)
Dumayas, Jr. v. COMELEC, 357 SCRA 358 (2001)
Mathay v. Civil Service Commission, 312 SCRA 91 (1999)Garces v. Court of Appeals, 259 SCRA 99 (1996)
Filipinas Engineering & Machine Shop v. Ferrer, 135 SCRA 25 (1985)
The Civil Service Commission
Qualifications
ART. IX-B, 1
Gaminde v. Commission on Audit, 347 SCRA 655 (2000)
Scope of the Civil Service
ART. IX-B, 2
Bliss Development Corporation Employees Union v. Civil Service Commission, 237 SCRA 271 (1994)
Cuevas v. Bacal, 347 SCRA 338 (2000)
Canonizado v. Aguirre, 323 SCRA 312 (2000)Civil Service Commission v. Salas, 274 SCRA 414 (1997)
Security of Tenure in the Civil ServiceART. IX-B, 2(3)
Right to Self-Organization
Bangalisan v. Court of Appeals, 276 SCRA 619 (1997)
Association of Court of Appeals Employees v. Ferrer-Calleja, 203 SCRA 596 (1991)
Central Personnel Agency
ART. IX-B, 3
Delos Santos v. Mallare, 87 Phil. 259 (1950)
Civil Service Commission v. Dacoycoy, 306 SCRA 425 (1999)
Lazo v. Civil Service Commission, 236 SCRA 469 (1994)
Orbos v. Civil Service Commission, 189 SCRA 459 (1990)Lapinid v. Civil Service Commission, 197 SCRA 106 (1991)
Oath or AffirmationART. IX-B, 4
Salary Standardization
ART. IX-B, 5
One-year Ban
ART. IX-B, 6
Prohibition on Multiple Offices
ART. IX-B, 7
Civil Liberties Union v. Executive Secretary, 194 SCRA 317 (1991)Flores v. Drilon, 223 SCRA 568 (1993)
Prohibition on Multiple Compensation
ART. IX-B, 8
Civil Liberties Union v. Executive Secretary, 194 SCRA 317 (1991)
Santos v. Court of Appeals, 345 SCRA 553 (2000)
Peralta v. Mathay, 38 SCRA 256 (1967)
Sadueste v. Municipality of Surigao, 72 Phil. 485 (1941)
The Commission on Elections
13
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
14/21
Qualifications
ART. IX-C, 1
Cayetano v. Monsod, 201 SCRA 210 (1991)
Brillantes, Jr. v. Yorac, 192 SCRA 358 (1990)
Powers & Functions
ART. IX-C, 2Montejo v. COMELEC, 242 SCRA 415 (1995)Mercado v. Board of Election Supervisors, 243 SCRA 422 (1995)
Beso v. Aballe, 326 SCRA 100 (2000)
Laurel v. Presiding Judge, RTC-Manila, Br.10, 323 SCRA 778 (1999)
Internal Organization
ART. IX-C, 3
Villarosa v. COMELEC, 319 SCRA 470 (1999)
Abad v. COMELEC, 320 SCRA 507 (1999)
Extraordinary Powers
ART. IX-C, 4National Press Club v. COMELEC, 207 SCRA 1 (1992)
Social Weather Stations, Inc. v. COMELEC, 357 SCRA 496 (2001)
Unido v. COMELEC, 104 SCRA 17 (1981)Sanidad v. COMELEC, 181 SCRA 529 (1990)
Recommendation on Pardons
ART. IX-C, 5
Free and Open Party System
ART. IX-C, 6
Prohibition on Block VotingART. IX-C, 7
Representation of Political PartiesART. IX-C, 8
Election Period
ART. IX-C, 9
Bona fide Candidates
ART. IX-C, 10
Expenses for Elections
ART. IX-C, 11
Commission on Audit
Qualifications
ART. IX-D, 1
Powers and Duties
ART. IX-D, 2
Development Bank of the Philippines v. Commission on Audit, 231 SCRA 202 (1994)
Development Bank of the Philippines v. Commission on Audit, G.R. No. 88435, 16 January 2002
14
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
15/21
Uy v. Commission on Audit, 328 SCRA 607 (2000)
Prohibition Against Exemption from JurisdictionART. IX-D, 3
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Court of Appeals, 218 SCRA 203 (1993)
Annual Report
ART. IX-D, 4
IX. LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Local Government Units
ART. X, 1
Metro Manila Development Authority v. Bel-Air Village Association, 328 SCRA 836 (2000)
Local Autonomy
ART. X, 2
R. A. No. 7160, 2-3
City Government of San Pablo, Laguna v. Reyes, 305 SCRA 353 (1999)
Ganzon v. Court of Appeals, 200 SCRA 271 (1991)
Local Government Code
ART. X, 3
R. A. No. 7160
General Supervision
ART. X, 4
Pablico v. Villapando, G.R. No. 147870, 31 July 2002
Pimentel v. Aguirre, 336 SCRA 201 (2000)
Drilon v. Lim, 325 SCRA 135 (1994)
Income Generation PowersART. X, 5
Manila Electric Co. v. Province of Laguna, 306 SCRA 750 (1999)PLDT v. City of Davao, 363 SCRA 522 (2001)
Resolutio on Motion for Reconsideration
Just Share in National TaxesART. X, 6
Pimentel v. Aguirre, Jr., 336 SCRA 201 (2000)
Equitable Share from Development of National Wealth
ART. X, 7
R. A. No. 7160, 289-294
Term of Office of Local Officials
ART. X, 8
Borja v. COMELEC, 295 SCRA 157 (1996)Socrates v. Hagedorn, G.R. No. 154512, 12 November 2002
Adormeo v. COMELEC, G. R. No. 147927, 4 February 2002
Lonzanida v. COMELEC, 311 SCRA 602 (1999)
Local Sectoral Representation
ART. X, 9
15
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
16/21
Plebiscite Requirement
ART. X, 10
Padilla v. COMELEC, 214 SCRA 735 (1992)Miranda v. Aguirre, 314 SCRA 603 (1999)
Cawaling, Jr., v. Executive Secretary, 368 SCRA 453 (2001)Mariano v. COMELEC, 252 SCRA 211 (1995)
Tan v. COMELEC, 147 SCRA 727 (1986)
Metropolitan Political Subdivisions
ART. X, 11
Metro Manila Development Authority v. Bel-Air Village Association, 328 SCRA 836 (2000)
Classification of Local Governments
ART. X, 12
Local Government Coordination
ART. X, 13
Regional Development Councils
ART. X, 14
Autonomous Regions
ART. X, 15
General Supervision over Autonomous Regions
ART. X, 16
Residual Powers
ART. X, 17
Organic Act for Autonomous RegionsART. X, 18-20
Ordillo v. COMELEC, 192 SCRA 100 (1990)
Abbas v. COMELEC, 179 SCRA 287 (1989)
X. ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS
Public Office as Public Trust
ART. X, 1
R. A. No. 6713
Impeachable Officers
ART. X, 2In re Indorsement from Gonzales, 160 SCRA 771 (1988)
Procedure for Impeachment
ART. X, 3
Sison & Hilbay,Impeachment Q & A (pp.1-12)
Estrada v. Desierto, 353 SCRA 452 (2001)
Romulo v. Yniguez, 141 SCRA 263 (1986)
In re Gonzalez, 160 SCRA 771 (1988)
The Sandiganbayan
ART. X, 4
16
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
17/21
Uy v. Sandiganbayan, 354 SCRA 651 (2001)
The Office of the Ombudsman ART. X, 5-7
Qualifications ART. X, 8-9
Rank ART. X, 10
Term ART. X, 11
Jurisdiction
ART. X, 12-13
Almonte v. Vasquez, 244 SCRA 286 (1995)Bureau of Internal Revenue v. Ombudsman, G. R. No. 115103, 11 April 2002
Camanag v. Guerrero, 268 SCRA 473 (1997)
Almonte v. Vasquez, 244 SCRA 286 (1995)
Acop v. Office of the Ombudsman, 248 SCRA 566 (1995)Garcia v. Mojica, 314 SCRA 207 (1999)
Raro v. Sandiganbayan, 335 SCRA 561 (2000)
Macalino v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 140199-140200, 6 February 2002Laurel v. Desierto, G.R. No. 145368, 12 April 2002
Fiscal Autonomy
ART. X, 14
Recovery of Unlawfully Acquired Properties
ART. X, 15
Presidential Ad-Hoc Fact-Finding Committee on Behest Loans v. Desierto, 317 SCRA 272 (1999)
Non-Accomodation Clause ART. X, 16
Statement of Assets and Liabilities ART. X, 17
Allegiance ART. X, 18
XI. NATIONAL ECONOMY & PATRIMONY
Goals of National EconomyART. XII, 1
The Regalian Doctrine
ART. XII, 2
Cruz v. Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources, 347 SCRA 128 (2000)
Miners Association of the Philippines v. Factoran, 240 SCRA 100 (1995)
Classification of Public Lands
ART. XII, 3
Chavez v. Public Estates Authority, G.R. No. 133250, 9 July 2002Lee v. Republic, 366 SCRA 524 (2001)
Pagkatipunan v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 129682, 21 March 2002
Rights of Indigenous Cultural Communities ART. XII, 5
Social Function of the Use of Property ART. XII, 6
17
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
18/21
Persons Qualified to Acquire Public Lands
ART. XII, 7-8
Krivenko v. Register of Deeds, 79 Phil. 461 (1947)Register of Deeds of Rizal v. Ung Sui Si Temple, 97 Phil. 58 (1955)
Roman Catholic Apostolic Prefect of Davao v. Register of Deeds, 102 Phil. 596 (1957)J.M. Tuazon & Co. v. Land Tenure Administration, 31 SCRA 413 (1970)
Meralco v. Castro-Bartolome, 114 SCRA 799 (1982)
Director of Lands v. Intermediate Appellate Court, 146 SCRA 509 (1986)Republic v. Court of Appeals, 155 SCRA 344 (1987)Republic v. Guzman, 326 SCRA 91 (2000)
Yap v. Court of Appeals, 312 SCRA 603 (1999)
Republic v. Court of Appeals, 235 SCRA 567 (1994)
Ong Ching Po v. Court of Appeals, 239 SCRA 341 (1994)Godinez v. Pak Luen, 120 SCRA 223 (1983)
Economic & Planning Agency
ART. XII, 9-10
Preference to Qualified Filipinos
Manila Prince Hotel v. GSIS, 267 SCRA 408 (1997)
Regulation of Franchises
ART. XII, 11
JG Summit Holdings v. Court of Appeals, 345 SCRA 143 (2000)
Tatad v. Garcia, 243 SCRA 436 (1995)
Bagatsing v. Committee on Privatization, 246 SCRA 334 (1995)
People v. Quasha, 93 Phil. 393 (1953)King v. Hernaez, 4 SCRA 792 (1962)
Filipino First Policy
ART. XII, 12
Practice of Profession
ART. XII, 14
Javellana v. DILG
Policy on Private Corporations
ART. XII, 16
Government Takeovers
ART. XII, 17-18
Anti-Trust Clause
ART. XII, 19
Garcia v. Corona, 321 SCRA 218 (1999)Tatad v. Secretary of the Department of Energy, 281 SCRA 330 (1997)
Central Monetary Authority
ART. XII, 20
Policy on Foreign Loans
ART. XII, 21
Sanctions for Violation
ART. XII, 22
18
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
19/21
SPECIAL INTERESTS
Social Justice and Human Rights
ART. XIII, 1-2
LaborART. XIII, 3
Philtread Workers Union v. Confesor, 269 SCRA 393 (1997)
Bangalisan v. Court of Appeals, 276 SCRA 619 (1997)
Jacinto v. Court of Appeals, 281 SCRA 57 (1997)
Agrarian and Natural Resources Reform
Basis
ART. XIII, 4-5
Association of Small Landowners in the Philippines v. Secretary of Agrarian Reform, 175 SCRA 343 (1989)
Gonzales, Jr. v. Alvarez, 182 SCRA 51 (1990)
Luz Farms v. Secretary of Agrarian Reform, 192 SCRA 51 (1990)
Stewardship Principle
ART. XIII, 6
Rights of Subsistence Fishermen
ART. XIII, 7
Tano v. Socrates, 278 SCRA 154 (1997)
Incentive to Landowners
ART. XIII, 8
Urban Land Reform and Housing ART. XIII, 9-10
Health ART. XIII, 11-13
WomenART. XIII, 14
Peoples Organizations ART. XIII, 15-16
Human Rights
The Commission on Human Rights
ART. XIII, 17
QualificationsART. XIII, 17
Powers and Functions
ART. XIII, 18-19
Simon v. Commission on Human Rights, 229 SCRA 117 (1994)
Education, Science and Technology, Arts, Culture and Sports
State Mandate on Education
ART. XIV, 1-3
19
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
20/21
U. P. v. Judge Ayson, 176 SCRA 571 (1989)
Mindanao University v. DAR, 215 SCRA 86 (1992)
Villar v. TIP, 135 SCRA 706 (1985)Tangonan v. Cruz Pano, 137 SCRA 245 (1985)
Ownership Requirement
ART. XIV, 4
Tax Exemption
ART. XIV, 4(3)(4)
Academic Freedom
ART. XIV, 5(2)
Miriam College Foundation v. Court of Appeals, 348 SCRA 265 (2000)
U. P. Board of Regents v. Court of Appeals, 313 SCRA 404 (1999)
University of the Philippines v. Civil Service Commission, 356 SCRA 57 (2001)
U.P. v. Judge Ayson, 176 SCRA 571 (1989)Alcuaz v. PSBA, 161 SCRA 7 (1988)
Licup v. University of San Carlos, 178 SCRA 637 (1989)
Right to Choose Profession ART. XIV, 5(3)
Highest Budgetary Priority
ART. XIV, 5(5)
Guingona, Jr. v. Carague, 196 SCRA 221 (1991)
Language
National Language ART. XIV, 6
Official Languages ART. XIV, 7
Science and Technology
Priority for Research and Development ART. XIV, 10-11
Regulation of Technology ART. XIV, 12
Protection of Intellectual Property ART. XIV, 13
Arts and Culture ART. XIV, 14-18
Sports ART. XIV, 19
The Family
Foundation of the Nation ART. XV, 1
Marriage ART. XV, 2
Guarantees ART. XV, 3
Care for Elderly ART. XV, 4
20
-
8/9/2019 Outline of Reviewers
21/21
XII. GENERAL PROVISIONS
The Philippine FlagART. XVI, 1
Ebralinag v. Division Superintendent of Schools in Cebu, 219 SCRA 256 (1993)
Other National Symbols ART. XVI, 2
The Armed Forces of the Philippines ART. XVI, 4-5
National Police Force
ART. XVI, 6
Agbay v. Deputy Ombudsman for the Military, 309 SCRA 726 (1999)Alunan III v. Asuncion, 323 SCRA 623 (2000)
Ownership of Mass Media
ART. XVI, 11
21