Oroville Dam Spillways Emergency, February 2017 and Beyond
Presented to the California Water Commission on May 18, 2017
DWR State Water Project
Overview
Largest state owned & operated water
delivery system in the U.S. CA voters
said yes in 1960 BPA
Multiple Purposes and Benefits: water
supply, flood control, Delta WQ, fish and
wildlife preservation and enhancement,
recreation, and electric grid stability
Serves 25 million Californians & over
750,000 acres of farmland
32 Storage Facilities, 21 Pumping Plants,
4 Pumping-generating Plants, 8
Hydroelectric Plants, about 700 miles of
Canals and Pipelines
ASCE Project of the Millenium and
numorous other accolades
Over 190 MAF delivered, over 200 million
recreation user days, and significant flood
control protection
SWP Facilities
SWP Beneficial Uses of the Feather River Local Senior Water Rights Supply, SWP Water Rights Conditions/Supply, Fish and Wildlife Preservation, and Flood Protection
Meet local water supply
contractual requirements
(superior water rights)
Specifically to support SWP
water supply deliveries
Meet Delta WQ requirements
(SWP water right permit req)
Flood control USACE Rule
Curve
Meet instream requirements
for flow/temp specifically for
endangered salmonids
SWP Oroville Facilities
hydropower generated
subordinate to the requirements
above (some peaking flexibility)
112 Year Hydrologic Record
of Feather River Watershed
Annual Runoff
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
19
06
19
09
19
12
19
15
19
18
19
21
19
24
19
27
19
30
19
33
19
36
19
39
19
42
19
45
19
48
19
51
19
54
19
57
19
60
19
63
19
66
19
69
19
72
19
75
19
78
19
81
19
84
19
87
19
90
19
93
19
96
19
99
20
02
20
05
20
08
20
11
20
14
20
17
TAF
Annual Unimpaired Runoff from the Feather River
Distribution of Landfalling Atmospheric Rivers on the U.S. West Coast (From 1 Oct 2016 to 12 April 2017)
Ralph/CW3E AR Strength Scale Weak: IVT=250500 kg m1 s1
Moderate: IVT=500750 kg m1 s1
Strong: IVT=7501000 kg m1 s1
Extreme: IVT>1000 kg m1 s1
AR Strength AR Count*
Weak 12
Moderate 21
Strong 13
Extreme 3
49 Atmospheric Rivers have made landfall on the West Coast thus far during the 2017 water year (1 Oct. 12 April 2017)
This is much greater than normal 1/3 of the landfalling ARs have been strong or extreme
*Radiosondes at Bodega Bay, CA indicated the 1011 Jan AR was strong (noted as moderate based on GFS analysis data) and 78 Feb AR was extreme (noted as strong)
By F.M. Ralph, B. Kawzenuk, C. Hecht, J. Kalansky
Water year 2017 AR landfall
locations through 11 April 2017
Location of landfall represents position where AR was strongest at landfall . Many ARs move down the coast over time. This map does not show these areas.
Wettest Year in Northern Sierra 8 Station Index History 97 years
Northern Sierra Snow Water Content Comparison in Wet YearsSignature of higher snow level storms very evident in 2016-2017
How wet has 2016-2017 been?
Sacramento Valley 8 Station wettest year in 97 year record Jan and Feb total precipitation was 46 inches Previous record was 40 inches
Inflow into Lake Oroville February was 540% of average Jan/Feb inflow was 4.4 MAF (= average annual)
Previous high was 3.48 MAF in 1909 Recent highs: 3.19 MAF in 1986; 3.07 MAF in 1997
Released the entire volume of the Lake (3.5 MAF) in 6 week period beginning in mid-Jan
Impaired gated spillway will have released almost 5 MAF since 2/7/17, more than twice any year in history
Inspection of Initial Spillway Deck and Foundation Erosion February 7, 2017
10
Damage after Flows Resumed on Feb. 8th, 2017 400 feet of headcutting in the first 24 hours 11
February 9th aggressive headcuttingcontinues, threatening Hyatt 230 Kvtransmission tower and entire line
The Dilemma what is the safe discharge of the gated spillway to preclude erosion encroaching on the gate structure and thus requiring permanent closure?
Gated Control Spillway at 55,000 cfs on 2/10/17, erosion had significantly slowed but not one expert in the joint command group believed it had stopped Emergency Spillway Grouting/Clearing/Grubbing Underway
12
Debris Dam Diversion Pool on February 27, 2017 1.7 MCY
13
Debris Dam in the Diversion PoolFebruary 27, 2017
14
Working to clear a HPGP Tailrace ChannelFebruary 28, 2017
15
Edward Hyatt Powerplant
Sandbagging Efforts by DWR Staff
16
Edward Hyatt Powerplant
Sandbags Placed to Protect Equipment
17
2017 Oroville Spillways Emergency Response and Recovery
Ongoing Response and Recovery: Protect the public, property, and all those responding to this emergency Continued Collaboration with State, Federal, and Local Agencies Diversion Pool Debris Clean-Up, >1,600,000 cy removed, more importantly
over 1 million cubic yards removed between 2/27 and 3/5! $274 million emergency response estimate provided to CalOES and FEMA
for February thru May 2017 costs (Recovery $s are separate) $150 million expended to date for debris removal, ES work, Hyatt flood fight, etc. Many emergency response work invoices still not submitted
Hyatt Powerplant Operations 5 units generating as of 3/9/17 after one month outage due to high tailrace WSEL flood threat Penstock 1 outage (U1-3) for annual maintenance 4/14-5/23
Drilling Gated Control Spillway slab and foundation data suggests much of upper chute w/thicker slab than as-built drawings show
Construction contract for Burma Road awarded to Teichert work underway for important construction access roads for $5.8 million
Spillway re-construction contract awarded to Keiwit Pacific for cutoff wall on ES, and RCC replacement of lower concrete chute for $275 million
Environmental and Cultural Collaboration/Assessments ongoing 18
Comparison of Lake Oroville Gated Control Spillway
19