Optimizing Resource Discovery Service Interfaces in
Statewide Virtual Libraries:The Library of Texas Challenge
William E. Moen, Ph.D.<[email protected]>
Texas Center for Digital Knowledge
University of North Texas
Denton, Texas
Presented at Libraries Without Walls 5: The Distributed Delivery of Library and Information ServicesSeptember 19-23, 2003 Lesvos, Greece
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 2
Presentation Overview
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 3
Library of Texas
A Virtual LibraryReaching Across Boundaries to
Extend Access to Information Resources
• Collection Boundaries
• Organizational Boundaries
• Format Boundaries
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 4
ZLOT project
• Z Implementation Component of the Library of Texas (ZLOT)– Develop standards-based approach for the virtual library
• Project Focus– Identify requirements for resource discovery service– Demonstrate feasibility and utility of resource discovery
tools– Assist in implementation and testing
• Phase 1 – 2002: Design and specifications• Phase 2 – 2003: Implementation
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 5
Characterizing the virtual library
• An environment for provision of – Services– Resources
• Not a digital library– Not all resources available are in
digital/electronic form
• An evolving product that responds to– Users’ needs– Available resources– Current and emerging technologies
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 6
Service-centric virtual library
Virtual Library Services
UserGroup
UserGroup
UserGroup
UserGroup
LibraryResources
LibraryTechnology
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 7
Virtual library services
Standard Information Interchange Among Services
Financial
Authorization
ResourceSharing
PatronAccount
LibraryInformation
EducationResourceDiscovery
Reference Personalization
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 8
Resource discovery
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 9
Resource discovery: Supporting user tasks
Browse
SelectCollection
Evaluate
Search
Common User Interface
Personalize
Save
Acquire
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 10
Content
Content
Content
Content
Content
OAIRepository
Standards-basedSearch & RetrievalProtocols
Proprietary or Non-standard
Search & Retrieval Protocols
Content
Content
Content
CommonSearch
Interface
Resource discovery:Operational view
UserInterface
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 11
Resource discovery:LOT RDS functional view
1. Library catalogs
2. Licensed databases
3. Archive of government information
4. Other collections
Search Targets/CollectionsMiddlewar
e
LOT RDS Interface
1. Broadcast searching
a. Similar resources
b.Dissimilar resources
2. Common retrieval display
1. Translates searches
2. Formats retrievals
3. Interacts with multiple IR systems
Information Retrieval Systems
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 12
LOT RDS:Summary of key requirements
• Customizable interface– For local library presence– For personalization
• Common interface for search and retrieval – Simple and advanced searching– Single database searching– Broadcast searching across similar/dissimilar databases
• Tools to help users select search targets• Common display for results• Indications of availability and “how to get”
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 13
Optimizing the RDS
• Assumptions– Multiple user groups – Diversity of information needs, behaviors, and
expectations– Users may not understand distributed search
applications– User interface presents complex functionality
• Strategy to optimize– Usability assessment– Helping users develop new mental model
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 14
Usability considerations
• Users– Categorization of users based on demographics,
skills, needs, behaviors– Current library users vs. new users
• Interface is really about functionality– Presents application and its components– Components support various user tasks
• Usability criteria, measures, and procedures
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 15
Usability criteria
• Jakob Nielsen – Learnability– Efficiency– Memorability– Errors– Satisfaction
– Other quality attributes (e.g., utility)
• Whitney Quesenbery– Effective– Efficient– Engaging– Error tolerant– Easy to learn
Nielson, J. (2003). Usability 101.http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030825.html
Quesenbery, W. (2002). Getting Started: Using the 5Es to understand users. http://www.wqusability.com/articles/getting-started.html
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 16
Application & components
• Technical components
• Interoperability components
• User interface components
• Task components – Collection selection components– Searching components– Retrieval components– Personalization components
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 17
Usability framework
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 18
Priority usability issues
• Do user understand the service?• Are user tasks supported?
– Tasks represented by application functionality– Selection of search targets– Searching
• Simple• Advanced• Refining searches
– Reviewing results– Navigating– Accessing/acquiring
• Is system performance adequate?
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 19
RDS example
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 20
RDS example
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 21
RDS example
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 22
RDS example
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 23
RDS example
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 24
RDS example
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 25
RDS example
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 26
RDS example
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 27
RDS example
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 28
RDS example
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 29
Informing the RDS product
• Heuristic evaluation by usability expert
• Acceptance testing by ZLOT staff– Use of original technical specifications– Identified usability issues
• User testing
• Ongoing testing by developers, ZLOT and TSLAC staff
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 30
5 Es of usability revisited
ResourceDiscovery
Service
Effective
Efficient
Easy to Learn
Engaging
Error Tolerant
Adapted from Quesenbery, W. (2002). Getting Started: Using the 5Es to understand users.
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 31
Next steps
• Prepare a formal usability assessment • Develop measures based on 5 Es to assess RDS
components• Develop scenarios for users to exercise all
functionality• Conduct user testing• Inform enhancements to the product
• Generalize usability assessment methodology other for metasearch applications, resource discovery services, and virtual libraries
Moen Libraries Without Walls 5 – September 19-23 32
William E. Moen
Library of Texas<http://www.tsl.state.tx.us/lot>
ZLOT Project<http://www.unt.edu/zlot/>
Texas Center for Digital Knowledge<http://www.txcdk.org/>