Socia
l Impa
ct A
sses
smen
t
ADP-1207-S
OC-0001-S
ocial Im
pact Ass
essm
ent
November 2
012
North
Ryde
Stat
ion Pr
ecinc
t Pro
ject:
Urbis‟s Social Policy team has received ISO 20252 Certification
for the provision of social policy research and evaluation, social planning, community consultation, market research and communications research.
© Urbis Pty Ltd
ABN 50 105 256 228 All Rights Reserved. No material may be reproduced without prior permission.
While we have tried to ensure the accuracy of the information in this publication, the Publisher accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions or resultant consequences including any loss or damage arising from reliance in
information in this publication. URBIS
Australia Asia Middle East urbis.com.au
URBIS STAFF RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS REPORT WERE:
xdisclaime rx
Director Roberta Ryan and Susan Rudland
Associate Director Erin Saunders
Senior Consultant Ben Dowler
Job Code SA4475
TABLE OF CONTENTS
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Context and purpose of this report ...................................................................................... 1
1.2 Study Methodology ............................................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................ 2 1.2.2 Stakeholder consultation ..................................................................................................... 3 1.2.3 Key Stakeholders ............................................................................................................... 3
1.3 Objectives of Social Impact Assessment ............................................................................. 4
1.4 Report Structure ................................................................................................................. 4
2 The North Ryde Station Precinct Project ................................................................................... 6
2.1 The North Ryde Station Precinct ......................................................................................... 6
2.2 The Proposal ...................................................................................................................... 8
3 Social Policy Context ................................................................................................................ 10
3.1 State Policy ...................................................................................................................... 10
3.2 Local Policy ...................................................................................................................... 11 3.2.1 Management Plan 2009 – 2013 ........................................................................................ 11 3.2.2 Social Plan 2005 ............................................................................................................... 11 3.2.3 City Housing Strategy ....................................................................................................... 11 3.2.4 Parks on Track for People 2025 ........................................................................................ 12 3.2.5 Draft Integrated Open Space Plan (IOSP) ......................................................................... 13
4 Existing Community Profile ...................................................................................................... 14
4.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 14
4.2 Age Structure ................................................................................................................... 14
4.3 Cultural and Linguistic Characteristics ............................................................................... 15
4.4 Income and Affluence ....................................................................................................... 16
4.5 Housing Tenure and Family Structure ............................................................................... 17
4.6 Education and Employment .............................................................................................. 19
5 Projected Future Community Profile ........................................................................................ 21
5.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 21
5.2 Comparison neighbourhoods ............................................................................................ 21 5.2.1 Chatswood ....................................................................................................................... 21 5.2.2 St Leonards ...................................................................................................................... 21 5.2.3 Top Ryde .......................................................................................................................... 21
5.3 Dwelling typologies ........................................................................................................... 22
5.4 Age Structure ................................................................................................................... 23
5.5 Education and Employment .............................................................................................. 24
5.6 Income and Affluence ....................................................................................................... 24
5.7 Housing Tenure and Household Structure ......................................................................... 25
5.8 Cultural and Linguistic characteristics ............................................................................... 27
5.9 Proposed and Approved Developments ............................................................................ 28
5.10 Summary of Projected Population ..................................................................................... 32
6 Existing Social Infrastructure ................................................................................................... 33
6.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 33
6.2 Public Transport ............................................................................................................... 33
6.3 Primary and Secondary Schools ....................................................................................... 37 6.3.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 37 6.3.2 School Location and Capacity ........................................................................................... 40
URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
6.4 Tertiary Education ............................................................................................................ 47
6.5 Preschools and Childcare Centres .................................................................................... 49
6.6 Libraries ........................................................................................................................... 51
6.7 Community Facilities ......................................................................................................... 53
6.8 Medical Centres and Hospitals.......................................................................................... 55 6.8.1 Hospitals .......................................................................................................................... 55 6.8.2 Medical centres and speciality services ............................................................................. 55
6.9 Aged Care ........................................................................................................................ 57
7 Social Infrastructure Assessment ............................................................................................ 60
7.1 Social Infrastructure Needs ............................................................................................... 60
7.2 Benchmarks ..................................................................................................................... 60 7.2.1 Social Infrastructure Benchmarks ..................................................................................... 60
7.3 Social Infrastructure Assessment and recommendations................................................... 62
8 Existing Open Space and Recreation Facilities ....................................................................... 67
8.1 Overall Open Space ......................................................................................................... 67
8.2 Natural Areas ................................................................................................................... 69
8.3 Blenheim Park .................................................................................................................. 69
8.4 Waterloo Park ................................................................................................................... 69
8.5 Els Hall Park ..................................................................................................................... 70
8.6 Santa Rosa Park .............................................................................................................. 70
8.7 Ryde Park ........................................................................................................................ 70
8.8 Meadowbank Park and Memorial Park .............................................................................. 70
8.9 Recreation Facilities ......................................................................................................... 70
9 Open Space Assessment .......................................................................................................... 73
9.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 73 9.1.1 Consultation ..................................................................................................................... 73 9.1.2 Benchmarks ..................................................................................................................... 75
9.2 Open Space In The NRSPP .............................................................................................. 77
9.3 Open Space Assessment ................................................................................................. 83
9.4 Conclusion And Recommendations .................................................................................. 86
10 Social Impact Assessment ....................................................................................................... 87
10.1 Potential Social Issues And Impacts ................................................................................. 87
10.2 Land Use .......................................................................................................................... 87
10.3 Built Form ......................................................................................................................... 88
10.4 Public Art .......................................................................................................................... 89
10.5 Connectivity And Accessibility ........................................................................................... 89
10.6 Sustainability .................................................................................................................... 90
10.7 Lane Cove National Park .................................................................................................. 90
10.8 Macquarie Park Cemetery and Crematorium..................................................................... 90
10.9 Housing Affordability ......................................................................................................... 91
10.10 Safety And Security .......................................................................................................... 91
11 Conclusion and Recommendations ......................................................................................... 94
Appendix A Correspondence from NSW Department of Education and Communities .......... 97
TABLE OF CONTENTS
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
FIGURES:
Figure 1 – Land parcels that make up the NRSPP ........................................................................................7 Figure 2 – Median weekly individual and household income – North Ryde, Ryde LGA and Sydney SD ......... 16 Figure 3 – Housing tenure – north Ryde, Ryde LGA and Sydney SD ........................................................... 17 Figure 4 – Household structure – North Ryde, Ryde LGA and Sydney SD ................................................... 18 Figure 5 – Approved and future proposed developments including population footprint as at September 201131 Figure 6 – Transportation routes within Ryde LGA ...................................................................................... 34 Figure 7 – Bus network routes (NRSPP) ..................................................................................................... 35 Figure 8 – STA and Hillsbus services operating via North Ryde ................................................................... 36 Figure 9 – Primary schools in Ryde LGA and proximity ............................................................................... 38 Figure 10 – Secondary schools in Ryde LGA and proximity ......................................................................... 39 Figure 11 – Ryde LGA primary schools....................................................................................................... 45 Figure 12 – Ryde LGA secondary schools .................................................................................................. 46 Figure 13 – Tertiary education within Ryde LGA ......................................................................................... 48 Figure 14 – Childcare and preschools within Ryde LGA .............................................................................. 50 Figure 15 – Libraries within Ryde LGA ........................................................................................................ 52 Figure 16 – Community halls, community facilities and meeting rooms ........................................................ 54 Figure 17 – Hospitals and medical centres located within Ryde LGA ........................................................... 56 Figure 18 – Aged care facilities and services .............................................................................................. 58 Figure 19 – Stepped spaces option ............................................................................................................ 79 Figure 20 – Open space Typologies ........................................................................................................... 82
TABLES:
Table 1 – SIA requirements ..........................................................................................................................1 Table 2 – Age distribution: Ryde suburb, Ryde LGA and the Sydney Statistical Division ............................... 14 Table 3 – Cultural background – North Ryde, Ryde LGA and Sydney SD .................................................... 15 Table 4 – Occupation categories – North Ryde, Ryde LGA and Sydney SD ................................................. 19 Table 5 – Highest tertiary education qualification achieved by residents aged 15 years and over – North Ryde,
Ryde LGA and Sydney SD....................................................................................................... 20 Table 6 –Potential dwelling typology for the NRSPP.................................................................................... 22 Table 7 – Comparison of dwelling schedule ................................................................................................ 22 Table 8 – Potential age profile .................................................................................................................... 23 Table 9 – Potential occupation profile (aged 15 years and over) .................................................................. 24 Table 10 – Potential average household income (per household) ................................................................ 25 Table 11 – Potential housing status ............................................................................................................ 25 Table 12 – Potential household structure .................................................................................................... 26 Table 13 – Potential family composition ...................................................................................................... 26 Table 14 – Potential birthplace ................................................................................................................... 27 Table 15 – Potential language groups ......................................................................................................... 27 Table 16 – Approved and future proposed developments within Ryde LGA as at July2012 ........................... 28 Table 17 – Existing capacity within schools in Ryde LGA ............................................................................ 40 Table 18 – Current schools in catchment summary ..................................................................................... 43 Table 19 – Projected demand school enrolments - 2013 ............................................................................. 43 Table 20 – Standards of primary schools within close proximity to the site (1.6km) ....................................... 44 Table 21 – Aged care facilities in Ryde LGA ............................................................................................... 57 Table 22 – Standards and Benchmarks For Social Infrastructure ................................................................. 61 Table 23 – Assessment of social infrastructure ........................................................................................... 62 Table 24 – Council managed open space in the Ryde LGA ......................................................................... 67 Table 25 – Taken from City of Ryde 2006, Parks on track for people 2025 ................................................... 69 Table 26 – Natural areas in the vicinity of the NRSPP ................................................................................. 69 Table 27 – Other existing open space and recreation facilities ..................................................................... 71 Table 28 – Standards for open space ......................................................................................................... 75
URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
Table 29 – Standards for recreational facilities ........................................................................................... 76 Table 30 – Open space provision in the NRSPP ......................................................................................... 80 Table 31 – Public domain CPTED considerations ....................................................................................... 92
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 INTRODUCTION 1
1 Introduction
This report constitutes a Social Impact Assessment (SIA) in support of a Rezoning Study in respect of the North Ryde Station Precinct Project (NRSPP).
The Rezoning Study seeks to establish a site specific planning regime for the North Ryde Station Precinct, including land use zones, building heights and floor space ratio (FSR) and maximum parking rates to facilitate the ultimate redevelopment of the precinct for a mixed use, transit-oriented development (TOD).
1.1 CONTEXT AND PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT
This report has been prepared in support of an application for the rezoning of land known as the North Ryde Station Precinct. The Rezoning Study (the Study) has been prepared on behalf of Transport for NSW (TfNSW, formerly Transport Construction Authority) to facilitate a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) that aims to encourage patronage of North Ryde Station and other nearby public transport systems and improve connectivity in the local area. The proposal seeks to facilitate the staged redevelopment of vacant lands around North Ryde Station for a mix of residential, commercial, retail, community and open space uses.
On 2 March 2011, the Minister for Planning (now Minister for Planning and Infrastructure) formed the opinion that the North Ryde Station Precinct was of potential State planning significance under State Environmental Planning Policy (Major Development) 2005 (MD SEPP) and Study Requirements (Requirements) for a State Significant Site Study (SSSS) were issued on 9 November 2011. The Precinct is now undergoing an assessment process to facilitate the rezoning of the site to allow for its staged redevelopment.
The Study is prepared in accordance with the Requirements issued in November 2011 and references the criteria for establishing State and regional planning significance under the MD SEPP.
The rezoning process seeks the establishment of a site specific planning regime for the North Ryde Station Precinct in the form of an amendment to the Ryde Local Environmental Plan addressing land use zones, building heights, FSR and maximum parking rates to facilitate the ultimate redevelopment of the precinct for a mix of residential, commercial, retail, community and open space uses. This regime will provide the planning framework against which the future staged development of the Precinct will be assessed.
In accordance with the above process, and in line with the original DGRs, a Rezoning Study is being prepared for the project, informed by a variety of specialist studies including this SIA.
The SIA has been prepared in accordance with the relevant DGRs, as shown in the table below:
TABLE 1 – SIA REQUIREMENTS
REQUIREMENT REFERENCE IN SIA
(1) Provide a social impact assessment of the proposal
including:
An assessment of any impacts on adjoining
communities
Sections 7, 9 and 10
A community profile and analysis of the needs
of future residents
Sections 4, 5, 7 and 9
2 INTRODUCTION URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
REQUIREMENT REFERENCE IN SIA
Details of the nature and scale of proposed
infrastructure that accurately reflects the
characteristics and likely needs of the intended
population. This should include but not be
limited to schools, childcare centres, medical
facilities, community facilities and open space;
and
Sections 6, 7, 8 and 9
Identification and management of any impacts
on nearby social infrastructure including the
Blenheim Park multipurpose facility.
Section 8.3
(2) Provide details of any open space and community
facilities and outline proposed management
arrangements of such facilities.
Sections 7, 9, 10 and 11
The SIA assesses the proposed land use change and planning framework to be established for the precinct to guide its future redevelopment. This report documents the findings of the assessment and makes appropriate recommendations for the management of potential social issues and impacts associated with the NRSPP.
1.2 STUDY METHODOLOGY
1.2.1 OVERVIEW
The recommendations contained in this report have been developed through a range of investigations including a local and regional social infrastructure audit and open space assessment, stakeholder consultation and review and input to various iterations of the project. The key tasks undertaken as part of the methodological process for the SIA include:
A review of the relevant State and local social policy context.
A review of the existing community demographic profile using Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) data.
Projected community demographic profiling.
Review of existing and proposed social infrastructure (local and regional scale).
Review of existing and proposed open space and recreational facilities (local and regional scale).
Stakeholder consultation with key local and regional stakeholders.
Participation in the project development phase regarding the delivery of social infrastructure, open space and recreational facility provision through various design reviews and workshops.
Review of key technical reports prepared to support the rezoning proposal which inform and address potential impacts on the community.
Identification of the potential social impacts and benefits of the proposal for both the future community of the North Ryde Station Precinct and the surrounding community.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 INTRODUCTION 3
Based upon the findings of the above analysis, an assessment of potential social issues and impacts associated with the NRSPP was undertaken and recommendations made in relation to the management of potential negative impacts and enhancement of positive impacts as appropriate.
1.2.2 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION
Urbis Pty Ltd Public Policy was engaged to assist with stakeholder and community consultation activities in relation to the NRSPP. The consultation process is documented in full in a separate community consultation report however an overview is provided here to inform the SIA.
The consultation process was designed in accordance with the City of Ryde Engagement Plan and Framework. The process is comprised of four key stages, the timing of which aligns with the assessment and approvals process. Key stages are:
Stage 1: Input into project development and land use study.
Stage 2: Detailed Environmental Impact Assessment.
Stage 3: Planning application.
Stage 4: Post-lodgement, including public exhibition.
Key activities completed or underway at the time of writing include:
Ongoing briefings with key stakeholders, including City of Ryde Council, the NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure, (DP&I) the NSW Department of Education and Communities (NSW DEC), Macquarie Park Cemetery and Crematorium and the NSW National Parks & Wildlife Services (NSW NPWS) (Lane Cove National Park).
Establishment of a project website, containing information and updates about the proposal, how to provide feedback and learn about the proposal, the team, the consultation process and opportunities to be involved.
Establishment of a Project Info Line, providing callers with the opportunity to contact the project team to ask questions, and to provide suggestions and feedback.
Advertisements about the project and consultation, published in the local newspaper (The Northern District Times) on 26 October and 2 November 2011.
Distribution of an addressed letter to approximately 90 local residents and businesses on 1 November 2011, outlining the project, the proponent and team, the consultation process and establishment of a Community Liaison Group (CLG).
Distribution of a community newsletter to approximately 2000 local residents and businesses on 31 October 2011, outlining the project, the proponent and team, the consultation process and establishment of a CLG.
Door knock (face-to-face discussions) by key team members from Urbis and TfNSW in Morshead Street and parts of Epping Road, Ryrie Road and Truscott Street that interface with Morshead Street, on Thursday 3 November 2011.
Establishment and facilitation of a Community Liaison Group (CLG), comprised of 12 community and business representatives selected via an advertised and open application process. The CLG had met four times (Monday 5 December 2011, Monday 19 December 2011, Monday February 6 2012 and Monday 12 March 2012) at the time of writing, with further meetings to be scheduled in 2012.
1.2.3 KEY STAKEHOLDERS
Urbis has undertaken a range of consultation activities with stakeholders to determine capacity of current facilities and potential current and future needs. This information, along with an examination of accepted benchmarks and standards, assisted in informing recommendations for potential community facilities on
4 INTRODUCTION URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
site as well as an understanding of the general requirements within the LGA. Council and a number of stakeholders were contacted to investigate the capacity, vacancies, trends and usage of local services and facilities. The following provides a list of those services providers and stakeholders consulted.
The NSW Department of Education and Communities (DEC).
Tertiary educational facilities including Macquarie University, Ryde TAFE and Meadowbank TAFE.
A number of local primary schools, including North Ryde Public School, Truscott Street Public School, and Holy Spirit Primary School.
A number of local secondary schools, including Epping Boys High, Holy Cross Catholic School and Ryde Secondary College.
A random selection of the 34 childcare centres and 10 preschools within Ryde LGA (nine) were contacted via telephone to gain further insight into capacity.
Some hospitals within Ryde LGA and four medical centres and speciality services located in the North Ryde suburb (via telephone interviews).
Eight telephone interviews were undertaken with aged care service providers to discuss trends in service usage, current capacity and plans for expansion.
Consultation was undertaken with five libraries located within Ryde LGA.
Four community facilities were consulted within the suburb of North Ryde.
Six sporting and recreational facilities including North Ryde RSL, the Macquarie University Sport and Aquatic Centre and the operators of other swimming facilities, golf clubs, tennis courts and private gyms.
Consultation with Macquarie Park Cemetery and Crematorium.
Consultation with NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (Lane Cove National Park).
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Based upon consideration of the nature of the proposal, the local and regional context and feedback from stakeholder consultation, the key objectives of the social impact assessment are:
To develop an understanding of the demographic characteristics of the existing local community and the likely future community of the NRSPP.
To identify and assess the potential impacts of the development upon the existing community in terms of demand for local facilities and services and general amenity.
To identify the facilities and services required to meet the needs of the future community and evaluate the proposed development in terms of its ability to provide these facilities.
1.4 REPORT STRUCTURE
The SIA report first establishes the context of the project from a social perspective including the existing community profile, the relevant social policy framework, existing social infrastructure and open space and key community views and perspectives of the area and the project.
The report goes on to profile the likely future community of the NRSPP and the likely needs of this community in terms of open space and recreation, community facilities and social infrastructure.
The report then details the findings of an assessment of the NRSPP against the various social issues identified and provides recommendations as to the management of any residual social impacts.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 INTRODUCTION 5
Specifically, the report is structured into the following key sections:
Description of the site and project, including stakeholder consultation.
Review of State and local policy context.
Review of existing community demographic profile.
Projected community demographic profiling.
Review of existing social infrastructure.
Review of existing open space and recreational facilities.
Social infrastructure and open space assessment.
Social Impact Assessment.
Summary of Findings and Recommendations
6 The NORTH RYDE STATION PRECINCT PROJECT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
2 The North Ryde Station Precinct Project
2.1 THE NORTH RYDE STATION PRECINCT
The North Ryde Station Precinct comprises four parcels of Government-owned land and one parcel of privately owned land located within the Macquarie Park Corridor (MPC), a predominately commercial area that lies between the M2 Motorway and Epping Road, North Ryde.
The Precinct is situated within the City of Ryde (Council) Local Government Area (LGA), at the southern end of the MPC. The lands have a total area of 13.99ha and are divided by the M2 Motorway, Epping Road and Delhi Road. The five separate but linked parcels of land comprising the Precinct are known as:
M2 Site (owned by TfNSW)
Station Site North (owned by TfNSW)
Station Site South (owned by Goodman International Funds Management Limited (Goodman))
Office of Strategic Lands (OSL) Site (owned by OSL)
Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) Site (owned by RMS)
Figure 1 overleaf illustrates the location and ownership of these land parcels.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 THE NORTH RYDE STATION PRECINCT PROJECT 7
FIGURE 1 – LAND PARCELS THAT MAKE UP THE NRSPP
Source: TfNSW, 2012
8 The NORTH RYDE STATION PRECINCT PROJECT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
2.2 THE PROPOSAL
The NRSPP represents a TOD which aims to make best and most efficient use of existing transport infrastructure in the vicinity. This transport infrastructure includes the Epping to Chatswood Rail Link (ECRL) with stations at North Ryde (within the Precinct) and Macquarie Park (within 800 metres of the Precinct) as well as high-frequency bus routes along Epping Road which dissects the Precinct.
The proposal is consistent with recognised TOD principles as it would provide the following:
Mixed use development within 800 metres of the North Ryde Station and Macquarie Park Stations, with greater focus on residential development, supported by appropriate community facilities.
Integration of North Ryde Station with retail, commercial, recreational and community uses, stimulating activity around the station precinct.
Significantly improved pedestrian and bicycle connectivity to North Ryde Station.
Improved pedestrian and bicycle connectivity to nearby employment areas within Macquarie Park.
Reduced levels of private vehicle parking combined with provision for car share schemes and other transport alternatives to reduce car dependency.
Liveable and active public domain spaces for the community that integrate with proposed land uses and the station.
High quality open space within a walkable catchment.
Proposed zones have been identified for the site to provide for the following land uses:
The high density residential zone (R4) across the majority of the M2 site and the medium density residential zone (R3) on the OSL and RMS sites providing for a diversity of housing types in close proximity to North Ryde Station.
The mixed use zone (B4) for the Station South and North sites and a portion of the M2 site providing for retail and commercial/employment on the M2 site and convenience retail and complementary commercial development in proximity to North Ryde Station.
The public recreation zone (RE1) throughout the precinct to provide a series of public open space areas, buffer zones and green links.
The RE1 zone will also allow for community facilities as a permitted use. The potential for a community centre with associated recreation space has been identified within the proposed RE1 zone on the M2 site.
A Development Control Plan (DCP) identifying development standards, public domain and road and infrastructure layout has been prepared to guide the future development of lands within the North Ryde Station Precinct.
Key elements of the DCP include:
Provision of a spine road through the M2 Site from Epping Road to Wicks Road to provide the main vehicular connection through the M2 site.
Development of a vehicular access point to the M2 Site from Epping Road and one on Wicks Road with connections onto Waterloo Road.
A footpath and pedestrian bridge sited at the southern end of the M2 site connecting the site with the Station.
Significant pedestrian and cycleway upgrades and new links to improve connectivity to North Ryde Station and the MPC.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 THE NORTH RYDE STATION PRECINCT PROJECT 9
A fixed quantum of private vehicle, public and other forms parking to promote public transport utilisation and reduced car dependency.
Sustainability initiatives including the use of native plants grown with locally sourced seed, Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) measures and rehabilitation of the riparian zones on the northern portion of the M2 Site to create a natural open space area with drainage area.
Best practice Urban Design to create usable spaces, enhanced amenity and activation of the Precinct in accordance with TOD principles.
10 SOCIAL POLICY CONTEXT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
3 Social Policy Context
3.1 STATE POLICY
3.1.1 NSW 2021: A PLAN TO MAKE NSW NUMBER ONE
NSW 2021 is a 10 year plan that focuses on the NSW economy, quality services, infrastructure, governance and local environment and communities. This Plan replaces the State Plan as the NSW Government‟s strategic business plan. The Plan set immediate and long term priorities and actions and guides NSW Government resource allocation in conjunction with the NSW Budget. The Plan has five strategies and 32 goals. The five strategies include:
1. Transport
2. Health
3. Family and Community Services
4. Education and Training
5. Police and Justice.
Of particular importance to the NRSPP is transport. Key goals within the transport strategy include:
Reduce travel times
Grow patronage on public transport by making it a more attractive choice
Improve customer experience with transport services
Improve road safety.
Key targets within these goals and specific to the NRSPP include:
Increasing the number of trips by public transport for all trips, in particular trips to work. Actions to deliver on the target include:
- Provide better public transport connections between and within population and economic centres through the development of strategic bus corridors, the potential expansion of Sydney‟s light rail network, and the upgrade of supporting infrastructure in key centres.
- Increase the frequency and efficiency of public transport services through improvements in timetabling and better service coordination.
- Introduce an electronic ticketing system.
In addition, there is a target to increase walking and cycling. Actions include:
Complete the construction of the Metro Sydney Bike Network and work with local councils to complete local cycle networks as part of an integrated transport network.
Develop and implement a NSW Walking Strategy to encourage and promote walking for travel and recreation, and to enhance walking environments in NSW.
The NRSPP will provide current and future residents with greater access and increase patronage to local train stations. The TOD will focus on providing greater access for residents to cycle, bus and train services through well designed pedestrian and cycle pathways in line with the strategic directions of NSW 2021.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 SOCIAL POLICY CONTEXT 11
3.2 LOCAL POLICY
3.2.1 MANAGEMENT PLAN 2009 – 2013
The City of Ryde Management Plan guides Council operations towards 2013, detailing Council structures, key strategies and planned capital works. Reflecting the overarching vision for Ryde to be “an innovative city, a leader in environmental, economic and social sustainability”, the Plan strives for sustainability in four key areas, making the following commitments:
People: The City of Ryde is committed to maintaining a socially sustainable City through community participation in our products and services.
Assets/Economic: The City of Ryde is committed to the delivery and maintenance of high quality public infrastructure and facilities
Environment: The City of Ryde is committed to maintaining an ecologically sustainable City through the management of our City’s natural and physical environment.
Governance: The City of Ryde is committed to effective decision-making processes that ensure transparency and involvement of its community.
With respect to social infrastructure and the needs of the community, the Management Plan:
Acknowledges that the Ryde LGA population is growing and changing, resulting in increased demand and diverse needs.
Makes a commitment to „enhance the capacity of the service network and emerging and anticipated needs‟.
Identifies the need for service accessibility to be enhanced for young people, older people, families and children.
3.2.2 SOCIAL PLAN 2005
The Social Plan was developed in 2005 to identify and respond to community needs to achieve the following the Vision of Ryde as: “A City that plans for people by identifying their diverse needs and involving them in decision making to improve their quality of life”. The key outcomes of the Social Plan are:
A vibrant city that is economically strong and engages its community through cultural and social activities.
A city that plans for people by involving them in decision making to improve their quality of life.
A harmonious community through culturally enriched and respectful society.
A variety of groups within the community are considered, including older people, young people, children, men, women, Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) people, Aboriginal people and people with a disability. The Plan makes a number of recommendations for Council-lead social initiatives targeting each of these groups and their needs. The wider community and minority groups within Ryde LGA are included in the consultation process of the NRSPP and a separate community and stakeholder consultation process has been undertaken through the development of the project. This process and its outcomes are documented separately as part of the broader rezoning study.
3.2.3 CITY HOUSING STRATEGY
The City Housing Strategy determines how best to accommodate future population and housing requirements within the LGA by defining the types and locations of land use and development. A series of community consultations and workshops were undertaken by Council to inform the outcomes of the Strategy. City of Ryde Housing Strategy aims to ensure that future residential development:
Is appropriately located
Addresses affordability
12 SOCIAL POLICY CONTEXT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
Promotes social wellbeing and community connections
Examines ways to maintain low density suburbs
Provides a modest housing mix for current and future residents
Enables people to easily access shops, services, open spaces
Is environmentally sustainable.
The housing study noted that in 2006, the most common housing type in the Ryde LGA was detached dwellings (54.5%), with 28.4% residential flats and 14.2% townhouses or semis. The study also noted some distinct trends in housing type in the LGA between 2001 and 2006 with an increase in medium density and high density housing and a general decrease in single detached dwellings overall.
The Study also establishes a range of key principles to guide planning for housing provision in the LGA including:
To meet the dwelling targets set by the Metropolitan Strategy and Sub-Regional Strategy
To maintain the City of Ryde‟s current strategic planning direction to focus the majority of residential growth within Macquarie Park and the town centres.
Encourage additional dwellings in small centres
Dwelling numbers and types should be appropriate to the nature of the centre.
Protect the character of low density residential areas.
Provide a diversity of housing types.
Provide high levels of residential amenity.
Encourage residential development which is sustainable.
The NRSPP aligns with many of these principles through the provision for a range of housing types within the MPC, centred on a railway station thus maximizing transport efficiency and sustainability. The project will contribute to the overall housing stock within the LGA as well as the diversity of housing and works to preserve the amenity of low density residential areas through sensitive urban design and an indirect reduction in pressure for higher density development within established low density areas.
3.2.4 PARKS ON TRACK FOR PEOPLE 2025
Introduced in 2006, Parks on Track for People 2025 provides direction for the management of Ryde‟s parks and reserves over a 20 year period. The Plan recognises the diversity and changing needs of the community and places emphasis on the provision of multi-purpose open spaces. It also seeks to enable the sustainable and equitable delivery of recreation and park resources across the community.
The Plan complements generic Plans of Management for sportsgrounds, parks, natural areas and general community uses, providing information about:
Trends in recreation and physical activity
Funding arrangements
Paradigms in service delivery across the major park types
The distribution and size of parks.
The plan is to be superceded by the Draft Integrated Open Space Plan (IOSP) currently under preparation and discussed in more detail below.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 SOCIAL POLICY CONTEXT 13
3.2.5 DRAFT INTEGRATED OPEN SPACE PLAN (IOSP)
At the time of writing this report, the City of Ryde Council was preparing the Integrated Open Space Plan (IOSP) which guides and influences future planning and management decisions for parks and open spaces in the Ryde LGA. The report is currently in draft form and has recently been on exhibition (concluding in June 2012). Whilst the document was not finalised at the time of writing this report, Part 4 (Needs and Demand Report) was made available for the purposes of this study.
The IOSP considers the supply of open space, investigates the recreation needs of the Ryde community and identifies opportunities to more sustainably manage and enhance open spaces in the LGA. This document is considered to be of particular relevance to the NRSPP and based on a review of available elements of the IOSP at the time of writing, key matters in the Plan include:
Open space is the most used facility/space in the LGA, with 13.7% of residents using parks and gardens at least once a month.
Formal, primarily indoor, recreation facilities are well used and in high demand.
The need for open space to accommodate changing demographics by providing a variety of open space settings.
The value of natural bushland in the area and to the community.
The need for better transport networks and linkages between open spaces (including bike and walking paths).
The opportunity for open spaces to facilitate social interaction.
A perceived oversupply of playgrounds, highlighting the need for more strategic thinking in planning for playgrounds.
The opportunity to investigate alternate open spaces, including rooftop areas.
The need to cater for groups such as youth and the CALD community.
The provision of spaces that encourage use throughout the day and night.
Opportunities for Council to partner with third parties in the provision of open space.
These matters were noted and considered in the planning for the precinct and used to inform the open space needs assessment detailed later in this report.
14 EXISTING COMMUNITY PROFILE URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
4 Existing Community Profile
4.1 OVERVIEW
The following presents an assessment of the demographic profile of the North Ryde suburb at 2006. The demographic profile of North Ryde is compared to the wider City of Ryde LGA and Sydney Statistical Division (Sydney SD). This analysis provides a context for assessing the current and future needs of the community of the North Ryde Station Precinct and City of Ryde LGA. The data and information in this section has been derived from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2006Census and the City of Ryde Community Profile. At the time of writing this report, the complete 2011 Census dataset was not available.
4.2 AGE STRUCTURE
At the time of the 2006 Census, there were a total of 10,195 residents in the suburb of North Ryde and a total of 96,948 within the greater City of Ryde LGA. Table 2 below illustrates the age distribution of these areas at 2006, comparative to the Sydney SD.
TABLE 2 – AGE DISTRIBUTION: RYDE SUBURB, RYDE LGA AND THE SYDNEY STATISTICAL DIVISION
AGE GROUP NORTH RYDE (SUBURB) RYDE LGA SYDNEY SD
NUMBER OF
PERSONS
% NUMBER OF
PERSONS
% NUMBER OF
PERSONS
%
0-4 years 593 5.8% 5,596 5.8% 270,814 6.6%
5-14 years 1,276 12.5% 10,575 10.9% 534,214 13.0%
15-24 years 1,195 11.7% 13,849 14.3% 569,896 13.8%
25-54 years 4,264 41.8% 43,223 44.6% 1,816,092 44.2%
55-64 years 1,051 10.3% 9,607 9.9% 422,182 10.2%
65 years and
over
1,815 17.8% 14,100 14.5% 505,979 12.3%
Total 10,195 100.0% 96,950 100.0% 4,119,190 100.0%
Median age 40 years 37 years 35 years
Source: ABS, 2011
Table 2 indicates:
The median age of the North Ryde (40 years) and Ryde LGA (37 years) population is higher than the Sydney SD (35 years). This is reflected in the higher proportion of people aged 65 years and over.
There is a slightly lower proportion of children (0-14 years) located within North Ryde (18.3%) and Ryde LGA (16.7%) when compared to the Sydney SD (19.6%).
The suburb of North Ryde has a slightly lower proportion of young people (15-24 years) when compared to the Ryde LGA and Sydney SD.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 EXISTING COMMUNITY PROFILE 15
4.3 CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC CHARACTERISTICS
The cultural and linguistic characteristics of North Ryde and the wider Ryde LGA are similar. The Ryde LGA has a lower proportion of people born in Australia (55.4%) when compared to the North Ryde (62.4%) and the Sydney SD (60.4%). This is also reflected in those people who stated they were born overseas; North Ryde (32.2%), Ryde LGA (37.6%) and Sydney SD (31.7%). A smaller proportion of people identified themselves as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Island in North Ryde (0.3%) and Ryde LGA (0.3%) when compared to the Sydney SD (1.1%).
With regards to those born overseas, the following table highlights the cultural groups with the largest representation in North Ryde, Ryde LGA and Sydney SD.
TABLE 3 – CULTURAL BACKGROUND – NORTH RYDE, RYDE LGA AND SYDNEY SD
NORTH RYDE RYDE LGA SYDNEY SD
China (4.0%) China (6.8%) England (3.5%)
England (3.3%) Hong Kong (2.8%) China (2.6%)
Hong Kong (1.8%) Republic of Korea (2.6%) New Zealand (2.0%)
Iran (1.5%) England (2.6%) Vietnam (1.5%)
Italy (1.4%) India (1.9%) Lebanon (1.3%)
Source: ABS, 2006
This table suggests a high proportion of Chinese born people and South East Asian born people generally, within North Ryde and the Ryde LGA when compared to the Sydney SD. There are also a notable percentage of people who were born in England.
The most common languages spoken at home other than English within North Ryde were: Cantonese (4.7%), Armenian (4.7%) and Mandarin (4.0%). Similarly, the most common language spoken at home within Ryde LGA other than English is Cantonese (7.0%), this is closely followed by Mandarin (5.9%) and Italian (3.1%). This is associated with the cultural make-up of these geographic areas.
16 EXISTING COMMUNITY PROFILE URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
4.4 INCOME AND AFFLUENCE
Figure 4 below illustrates the median weekly individual and household incomes North Ryde, compared to the Ryde LGA and the wider Sydney SD.
FIGURE 2 – MEDIAN WEEKLY INDIVIDUAL AND HOUSEHOLD INCOME – NORTH RYDE, RYDE LGA AND SYDNEY SD
Source: ABS, 2006
It is noted that the median weekly individual incomes for North Ryde, Ryde LGA and the Sydney SD are similar. When compared, the suburb of North Ryde has the lowest median weekly individual income ($491). However, the suburb of North Ryde has the highest median weekly household income ($1,238) when compared to the Ryde LGA ($1,158) and Sydney SD ($1,154).
The Social-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA)1 index of relative socio-economic disadvantage has
been referenced in relation to North Ryde and Ryde LGA. When ranked across Australia, the North Ryde suburb is ranked in the 8
th SEIFA decile, indicating low levels of disadvantage. When compared within
NSW it is ranked in the 7th decile. The Ryde LGA is ranked in the 10
th decile (highest) within Australia and
ranked in the 9th decile within NSW. Overall, these suggest that North Ryde and Ryde LGA have low
levels of disadvantage.
1 Socio-economic Index for Areas, ABS data, 2006, accessed at:
http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/DetailsPage/2033.0.55.0012006?OpenDocument
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 EXISTING COMMUNITY PROFILE 17
4.5 HOUSING TENURE AND FAMILY STRUCTURE
Figure 3 below provides an overview of tenure types within the suburb of North Ryde, Ryde LGA and the Sydney SD, at the time of the 2006 Census.
FIGURE 3 – HOUSING TENURE – NORTH RYDE, RYDE LGA AND SYDNEY SD
Source: ABS, 2006
This figure indicates:
The suburb of North Ryde had a higher proportion (42.5%) of people who stated that they fully owned their dwelling when compared to Ryde LGA (32.9%) and the Sydney SD (30.1%).
North Ryde and the Sydney SD have a similar percentage of dwellings being purchased when compared to the wider Ryde LGA.
North Ryde has a considerably lower percentage of people who rent (20.3%) when compared to the wider Ryde LGA (31.4%) and the Sydney SD (29.7%). This is reflective of the higher percentage of fully owned dwellings in North Ryde.
Overall, this suggests that North Ryde is a suburb where many residents have settled, invested economically and have become part of the community. It suggests long term residents and an established and stable community. A lower percentage of renters when compared to Ryde LGA and Sydney SD suggests fewer opportunities for people moving into and out of the North Ryde suburb.
18 EXISTING COMMUNITY PROFILE URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
Figure 4 below illustrates the predominant household structures within the North Ryde suburb and the wider Ryde LGA and Sydney SD at the time of the 2006 Census. The following points are highlighted:
There are a higher proportion (74.7%) of family households within North Ryde when compared to Ryde LGA and the Sydney SD. This may reflect the higher median household incomes within North Ryde when compared to Ryde LGA and Sydney SD.
There are a lower proportion of lone person households within North Ryde and Sydney SD when compared to the wider Ryde LGA. This may suggest that although not in the suburb of North Ryde there is a significant presence of one bedroom apartments and/or Independent Living Units for the elderly (ILUs) within Ryde LGA.
North Ryde has a slightly lower proportion of group households when compared to Ryde LGA and Sydney SD.
Figure 4 – Household structure – North Ryde, Ryde LGA and Sydney SD
Source: ABS, 2006
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 EXISTING COMMUNITY PROFILE 19
4.6 EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT
At the time of the 2006 Census, the unemployment rate in North Ryde was 3.5%, considerably lower than the Sydney SD at 5.3%, and somewhat lower than for the Ryde LGA at 4.7%. Table 4 below provides an outlines of the key occupation categories for the suburb of North Ryde, the Ryde LGA and the Sydney SD.
TABLE 4 – OCCUPATION CATEGORIES – NORTH RYDE, RYDE LGA AND SYDNEY SD
OCCUPATION NORTH RYDE RYDE LGA SYDNEY SD
Managers 13.6% 13.7% 13.2%
Professionals 26.1% 29.3% 23.7%
Technicians and Trades
Workers
12.9% 11.3% 12.7%
Community and Personal
Service Workers
7.0% 7.2% 8.0%
Clerical and Administrative
Workers
18.3% 17.7% 16.7%
Sales Workers 10.1% 9.0% 9.5%
Machinery Operators And
Drivers
3.6% 3.4% 6.0%
Labourers 6.6% 6.6% 8.1%
Source: ABS, 2006
The above table suggests:
The occupation profile of North Ryde and Ryde LGA suggests a slightly higher proportion of white collar workers, with a lower proportion of machinery operators and drivers (3.6% and 3.4% respectively) when compared to the Sydney SD of 6.0%. The Sydney SD also has a slightly higher proportion of Labourers compared to North Ryde and the Ryde LGA.
North Ryde and Ryde LGA have a slightly higher proportion of clerical and administrative workers when compared to Sydney SD. This may reflect the opportunities provided by the MPC including the Macquarie Business and Technology Park and the number of educational facilities located across the LGA.
Overall, North Ryde (26.1%) and Ryde LGA (29.3%) have a higher proportion of professional workers when compared to the Sydney SD. The higher number of professionals may also be associated with the slightly higher median weekly individual and household incomes within Ryde LGA.
20 EXISTING COMMUNITY PROFILE URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
Table 5 below shows the highest educational qualifications achieved by residents (15 years and over) at the time of the 2006 Census. The table compares North Ryde with Ryde LGA and the Sydney SD.
TABLE 5 – HIGHEST TERTIARY EDUCATION QUALIFICATION ACHIEVED BY RESIDENTS AGED 15 YEARS AND OVER – NORTH RYDE, RYDE LGA AND SYDNEY SD
HIGHEST QUALIFICATION ACHIEVED (15 YEARS+)
NORTH RYDE RYDE LGA SYDNEY SD
Bachelor or higher degree 36.0% 41.1% 32.6%
Advanced diploma or diploma
17.5% 18.0% 16.4%
Vocational 26.1% 20.6% 26.0%
Not stated 17.0% 17.4% 22.0%
Source: ABS, 2006
The above table shows:
There are a considerably higher percentage of people with a Bachelor or higher degree living in North Ryde (36.0%) and Ryde LGA (41.1%), when compared with the Sydney SD (32.6%).
Of the number of people aged 15 years and over who stated they had a tertiary qualification, North Ryde had the highest proportion of people that had an advanced diploma, diploma or vocational qualification (53.5%). Ryde LGA had a total of 38.6% and the Sydney SD had 42.4%. These are reflective of the high proportion of people with a Bachelor degree or higher within Ryde LGA generally.
North Ryde and Ryde LGA had a slightly lower proportion of people who did not state any qualification when compared to the Sydney SD.
Overall, North Ryde and Ryde LGA have a high proportion of people aged 15 years and over with a tertiary qualification when compared to the Sydney SD.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 PROJECTED FUTURE COMMUNITY PROFILE 21
5 Projected Future Community Profile
5.1 OVERVIEW
The following presents a projection of the likely demographic profile of the incoming population for the NRSPP. This assessment has been based on a review of existing resident profiles of similar neighbourhoods, which have undergone high density mixed use development in recent years and are located within close proximity to the NRSPP. These neighbourhoods include the suburbs of Chatswood and St Leonards, and the development area known as Top Ryde.
2006 Census data has been used to identify the demographic profile of existing residents within the comparison neighbourhoods. The estimated demographic profile for the NRSPP has been developed based on the average profile of the three comparison neighbourhoods. This provides a general overview of the potential demographic profile for the NRSPP development without providing detailed analysis of the dwelling structure and other factors which may impact the resident demographic profile.
5.2 COMPARISON NEIGHBOURHOODS
5.2.1 CHATSWOOD
Chatswood is an established residential neighbourhood located 5km east of the NRSPP development site and 10km north of Sydney CBD. The suburb has undergone significant development over the last 20 years and is now a major commercial and retail district in North Sydney. The suburb is characterised by a number of high density residential towers, headquarters of major companies and a number of large shopping centres. Recent development in the area includes the “Metro Chatswood”, a TOD which includes high density residential development located in close proximity to a railway and bus interchange.
In 2006 the suburb had a population of 21,093 people, with relatively high proportions of residents from China, Hong Kong and South Korea. The suburb has a population density of approximately 4,074 people per sq.km.
5.2.2 ST LEONARDS
St Leonards is located 6km south east of the NRSPP site and 5km north west of Sydney CBD. The suburb lies across the LGAs of Lane Cove, North Sydney, and City of Willoughby. The area was originally developed as a major rail interchange and has since undergone high density development for residential and commercial purposes, leveraging from its proximity to the CBD.
The suburb is characterised by a major commercial centre which includes a number of high rise developments. This includes “The Forum” development, a large scale complex of three commercial office buildings, two residential towers containing 782 apartments, and a number of retail outlets. The development was constructed over the existing railway station.
In 2006 the suburb had a population of 4,188 people, and a population density of approximately 5,260 people per sq.km.
5.2.3 TOP RYDE
The area of Top Ryde is an unofficial locality within the City of Ryde LGA. It is located approximately 3km south west of the NRSPP site, and contains high density commercial/retail and residential buildings located around the intersection of Devlin Street and Blaxland Road.
In 2006 the area was estimated to have a population of 1,385 and a population density of 3,318 people per sq.km.
The area of Top Ryde is currently undergoing large scale development. This has not been captured in this profile as this data originates from 2006.
22 PROJECTED FUTURE COMMUNITY PROFILE URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
5.3 DWELLING TYPOLOGIES
To estimate the suitability of the three comparison neighbourhoods against the NRSPP development, the dwelling typology for these neighbourhoods has been compared to the potential dwelling typology for the NRSPP (shown 8 below). It is estimated that he NRSPP could provide 2,564 units, providing accommodation for approximately 4,565 residents. This equates to an average occupancy rate of 1.78 people per unit. It should be noted that potential occupancy rates for each dwelling type have not been considered in this calculation, this is therefore provided as a guide only.
TABLE 6 –POTENTIAL DWELLING TYPOLOGY FOR THE NRSPP
ACCOMMODATION SCHEDULE % NO. UNITS NO. RESIDENTS
Studios 5% 128 228
1 bed 30% 769 1370
2 bed 50% 1282 2283
2 bed rooftop 5% 128 228
3 bed 4.5% 115 205
3 bed rooftop 5% 128 228
3 bed penthouse 0.5% 13 23
Total 2,564 4,565
Source: ABS, 2006 and Urbis, 2012
Table 7 below compares the accommodation schedule of the three comparison neighbourhoods and that which is estimated for the NRSPP.
TABLE 7 – COMPARISON OF DWELLING SCHEDULE
ACCOMMODATION
SIZE
CHATSWOOD ST LEONARDS TOP RYDE AVERAGE NRSPP
% NO.
No bedroom* 1.1% 4.8% 0.7% 2.2% 5%* 128
1 Bedroom 13.4% 38.2% 18.0% 23.2% 30% 769
2 Bedrooms 39.5% 37.6% 58.3% 45.2% 55% 1,410
3 Bedrooms 28.8% 16.7% 16.5% 20.7% 10% 256
4 or more Bedrooms** 17.2% 2.7% 6.4% 8.8% 0% 0
Notes:
* Relates to studio accommodation for NRSPP
** includes 3 bed rooftop, and penthouse apartments
Source: ABS, 2006 and Urbis, 2012
This indicates that the area of St Leonards has a similar accommodation structure compared with the potential for NRSPP, with high proportions of 1 bedroom and 2 bedroom dwellings. Chatswood has significantly higher proportions of 3 bedrooms and 4 or more bedroom dwelling types compared to the other neighbourhoods.
The average dwelling size of the three comparison areas is similar to the proposed dwelling typology of the NRSPP, with the majority of dwellings of 2 or 1 bedroom. The comparison neighbourhoods have higher proportions of dwellings with 3 or more bedrooms compared to the NRSPP accommodation schedule. This may result in a higher proportion of family households identified in the average demographic profile for the comparison areas, than would be expected for the NRSPP.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 PROJECTED FUTURE COMMUNITY PROFILE 23
5.4 AGE STRUCTURE
Table 8 below presents the age structure of comparable neighbourhoods and the estimated age profile for residents of the NRSPP.
The demographic profile of Chatswood, St Leonards and Top Ryde is characterised by high proportions of young residents between the ages of 20 and 44 years old, with smaller proportions of residents aged 14 years or younger, and 44 years or older. However the Chatswood and Top Ryde areas have higher proportions of residents over the age of 65 years, compared with St Leonards.
Based on the comparable neighbourhoods, it is anticipated that the NRSPP development may attract a high proportion of residents (53.4%) between the ages of 20 and 44 years old. The largest age category is likely to be the 25-29 year age group with 662 residents (14.5%).
It is also anticipated that the NRSPP will attract a relatively high proportion of older residents with approximately 413 people (9.0%) over the age of 65 years old. It is suggested that older residents may appreciate the proximity of the development to the City and surrounding suburbs, and the relative affordability of smaller units.
TABLE 8 – POTENTIAL AGE PROFILE
Age cohort Chatswood St Leonards Top Ryde NRSPP
% NO.
Aged 0-4 5.6% 4.2% 4.8% 4.9% 223
Aged 5-9 4.8% 2.2% 5.2% 4.1% 185
Aged 10-14 4.9% 1.7% 4.6% 3.7% 170
Aged 15-19 6.0% 3.6% 5.2% 4.9% 225
Aged 20-24 9.8% 12.5% 8.3% 10.2% 465
Aged 25-29 10.1% 21.8% 11.6% 14.5% 662
Aged 30-34 9.1% 16.7% 10.0% 11.9% 544
Aged 35-39 8.2% 10.3% 9.8% 9.4% 430
Aged 40-44 7.4% 6.4% 8.4% 7.4% 337
Aged 45-49 6.9% 5.7% 8.6% 7.1% 322
Aged 50-55 5.8% 4.4% 5.1% 5.1% 233
Aged 55-59 5.4% 4.0% 4.2% 4.5% 207
Aged 60-64 3.6% 2.3% 3.9% 3.3% 149
Aged 65+ 12.3% 4.2% 10.6% 9.0% 413
Total 4,565
Source: ABS, 2006
24 PROJECTED FUTURE COMMUNITY PROFILE URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
5.5 EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT
Table 9 below presents the occupation profile of residents within the three comparison neighbourhoods and the estimated occupation profile for incoming residents of the NRSPP.
This indicates that on average the comparable neighbourhoods have high proportions of residents employed as professionals (35.3%), clerical and administrative workers (16.1%), or managers (15.5%), and low proportions of labourers (5.4%) and machinery operators (3.2%).
Based on the comparable neighbourhoods, it is anticipated that the NRSPP development will attract predominantly white collar workers with approximately 1,612 residents employed as professionals, 737 employed in clerical and administrative, and 708 residents employed in managerial occupations.
TABLE 9 – POTENTIAL OCCUPATION PROFILE (AGED 15 YEARS AND OVER)
Occupation Chatswood St Leonards Top Ryde NRSPP
% No.
Managers 17.3% 19.4% 9.9% 15.5% 708
Professionals 37.3% 45.5% 23.1% 35.3% 1612
Technicians & trades workers
7.5% 5.7% 14.6% 9.3% 423
Community & Personal Service Workers
6.6% 5.9% 7.4% 6.6% 303
Clerical & Administrative Workers
15.1% 13.4% 20.0% 16.1% 737
Sales Workers 9.8% 6.5% 9.3% 8.5% 388
Machinery operators & Drivers
1.9% 1.6% 6.3% 3.2% 148
Labourers 4.6% 2.2% 9.4% 5.4% 246
Total 4,565
Source: ABS, 2006
5.6 INCOME AND AFFLUENCE
Table 10 overleaf presents the average household income for the three comparison neighbourhoods and the estimated average household income for the NRSPP.
This indicates that the area of St Leonards has the highest average household income of $94,614, compared to $80,469 in Chatswood, and $57,603 in Top Ryde. It is likely that St Leonards has a higher average household income due to location of nearby medical employment, including Royal North Shore Private Hospital. Over 35% of households in St Leonards earn over $130,000, compared to only 26% in Chatswood and 6.6% in Top Ryde.
Based on the average household income profile of the comparison neighbourhoods it is anticipated that the average household income for the NRSPP will be $77,562 – however this does not take into account the cost or affordability of the proposed dwellings. This is similar to the average household income for the Chatswood neighbourhood.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 PROJECTED FUTURE COMMUNITY PROFILE 25
TABLE 10 – POTENTIAL AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD INCOME (PER HOUSEHOLD)
Income Chatswood St Leonards Top Ryde NRSPP
% No.
Average household income $80,469 $94,614 $57,603 $77,562
$Neg/Nil 5.3% 4.4% 2.1% 3.9% 180
$1-$13,000 5.2% 3.5% 8.9% 5.9% 268
$13,000-$18,200 5.4% 2.2% 5.9% 4.5% 205
$18,200-$26,000 2.0% 0.7% 4.6% 2.4% 111
$26,000-$33,800 7.8% 3.8% 10.1% 7.2% 331
$33,800-$41,600 5.2% 4.7% 7.8% 5.9% 270
$41,600-$52,000 6.5% 6.0% 11.2% 7.9% 361
$52,000-$62,400 9.7% 10.1% 14.7% 11.5% 525
$62,400-$72,800 4.1% 3.1% 4.8% 4.0% 182
$72,800-$88,400 7.9% 9.5% 11.9% 9.8% 445
$88,400-$104,000 7.6% 10.5% 6.7% 8.3% 377
$104,000-$130,000 7.4% 6.4% 4.8% 6.2% 284
$130,000-$156,000 12.4% 18.1% 4.3% 11.6% 529
$156,000 plus 13.6% 16.9% 2.3% 10.9% 499
Source: ABS, 2006
5.7 HOUSING TENURE AND HOUSEHOLD STRUCTURE
Table 11 below presents the housing status of residents within the three comparison neighbourhoods and the estimated housing status profile for the NRSPP.
This indicates that the majority of residents (54.5%) within the three comparison neighbourhoods currently rent their dwelling from private landlords. There are a smaller proportion of residents who own their dwelling (22.8%) or are in the process of purchasing a property (22.7%).
The neighbourhoods of Chatswood and Top Ryde have significantly higher proportion of residents who have purchased their property (32.5%, and 23.0% respectively) compared to St Leonards (13.0%). It is anticipated that this may be due to recent development within St Leonards and employment in surrounding land uses including medical and technology hubs.
Based on the table below it is estimated that approximately 2,488 residents within the NRSPP will be renters, with 1,042 residents owning and 1,035 residents purchasing their property.
TABLE 11 – POTENTIAL HOUSING STATUS
Housing Status Chatswood St Leonards
Top Ryde
NRSPP
% No.
Owner 32.5% 13.0% 23.0% 22.8% 1,042
Purchaser 24.0% 20.0% 24.0% 22.7% 1,035
Renter 43.5% 67.0% 53.0% 54.5% 2,488
Public Renter 1.4% 0.8% 0.9% 1.0% 48
Private Renter 41.4% 66.0% 52.1% 53.2% 2,428
Source: ABS, 2006 and Urbis, 2012
26 PROJECTED FUTURE COMMUNITY PROFILE URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
Table 12 below presents the household structure of dwellings within each of the comparison neighbourhoods, and the potential household structure for the NRSPP.
This indicates that the majority (59.5%) of dwellings within the comparison neighbourhoods were family households, with 40.5% of dwellings identified as non-family households. Of the non-family households, 33.5% were identified as lone person households, with only 7.0% identified as group households.
Based on the above, it is anticipated that of the 2,564 dwellings proposed by the NRPP, 1,525 will be family households, with 859 lone person households, and 180 group households.
TABLE 12 – POTENTIAL HOUSEHOLD STRUCTURE
Household structure Chatswood St Leonards Top Ryde NRSPP
% No.
Family Households 67.9% 53.6% 56.9% 59.5% 1,525
Non-Family Households 32.1% 46.4% 43.1% 40.5% 1,039
Group 7.0% 9.3% 4.8% 7.0% 180
Lone Person 25.1% 37.1% 38.3% 33.5% 859
Source: ABS, 2006 and Urbis, 2012
Note: Group and lone person households are considered to be non-family households.
Table 13 below identifies the composition of family households for the three comparative neighbourhoods and the NRSPP.
This indicates that St Leonards has a significantly higher proportion of family households identified as a couple family with no children (61.4%) compared with Chatswood (38.1%) and Top Ryde (39.4%), suggesting a high proportion of young single couples in the area.
TABLE 13 – POTENTIAL FAMILY COMPOSITION
Family composition Chatswood St Leonards
Top Ryde
NRSPP
% No.
Couple family with no children 38.1% 61.4% 39.4% 46.3% 706
Couple family with children under 15 29.4% 17.5% 31.2% 26.0% 397
Couple family with no children under 15 13.9% 6.5% 9.3% 9.9% 151
One parent family with children under 15 5.1% 2.5% 9.3% 5.7% 86
One parent family with no children under 15 8.8% 7.2% 8.2% 8.1% 123
Other 4.6% 4.8% 2.5% 4.0% 61
Source: ABS, 2006 and Urbis, 2012
Based on the above it is estimated that of the 1,525 family households estimated for the NRSPP, 706 will be couple families with no children, 397 will be couple families with children under 15 years old, and 151 will be couple families with no children under 15 years old.
It should be noted again that this assessment does not consider the types of dwellings or units proposed at the site, and should be used as a guide to likely population characteristics of similar development areas.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 PROJECTED FUTURE COMMUNITY PROFILE 27
5.8 CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC CHARACTERISTICS
Table 14 below presents the birthplace of residents in comparable neighbourhoods and the estimated birthplace profile of residents of the NRSPP. This only provides a comparison of the 11 largest groups and does not consider all birthplace locations. This indicates that the majority of residents in the comparable neighbourhoods were born overseas, 55.2%, compared to those born in Australia, 44.8%. The majority of residents born overseas were born in Asian countries, with high proportions of residents born in North East Asia (19.5%) and South East Asia (8.7%).
Based on the birthplace profile of the comparison areas, it is estimated that the NRSPP will attract a large proportion of overseas investors with approximately 2,522 residents from overseas. Of these 892 may come from North East Asia, 395 from South East Asia, and 220 from North West Europe. These figures are based solely upon an analysis of demographics in comparison neighbourhoods and do not account for project specific cultural influences such as the proximity of the site to a cemetery which may affect the desirability of the development for certain Asian cultures.
TABLE 14 – POTENTIAL BIRTHPLACE
BIRTHPLACE CHATSWOOD ST
LEONARDS
TOP
RYDE
NRSPP
% NO.
Australian Born 44.2% 42.2% 47.9% 44.8% 2,043
Overseas Born 55.8% 57.8% 52.1% 55.2% 2,522
Oceania 3.2% 4.8% 3.2% 3.7% 169
North West Europe 5.2% 6.4% 2.8% 4.8% 220
Southern and Eastern Europe
1.9% 1.6% 6.5% 3.4% 153
North Africa and the Middle East
0.8% 0.3% 2.8% 1.3% 61
South East Asia 6.8% 9.2% 9.9% 8.6% 395
North East Asia 26.3% 21.4% 10.9% 19.5% 892
Southern and Central Asia
2.1% 3.8% 3.0% 3.0% 135
Americas 0.9% 1.2% 0.5% 0.9% 39
Sub Saharan Africa 0.7% 0.8% 0.7% 0.8% 34
Source: ABS, 2006 and Urbis, 2012
Table 15 below identifies the language profile of residents in the comparison areas, and the potential language diversity of the proposed incoming population. This indicates that the main language spoken by residents at home for each neighbourhood is English. There are also a high proportion of residents whose main language spoken at home is Chinese. Chatswood has the highest proportion of Chinese speaking residents, with a total of 25.3% of residents speaking either Cantonese or Mandarin.
The NRSPP is expected to attract a high proportion of investors from overseas, most likely from China, Hong Kong or Korea. It is estimated that up to 886 people (19.4%) of the incoming population could speak Chinese as their main language.
TABLE 15 – POTENTIAL LANGUAGE GROUPS
LANGUAGE
SPOKEN AT HOME
CHATSWOOD ST LEONARDS TOP RYDE NRSPP
% NO.
English only 51.0% 55.2% 44.9% 50.4% 2,299
28 PROJECTED FUTURE COMMUNITY PROFILE URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
LANGUAGE
SPOKEN AT HOME
CHATSWOOD ST LEONARDS TOP RYDE NRSPP
% NO.
Chinese - Cantonese 14.1% 11.5% 5.5% 10.4% 473
Chinese - Mandarin 11.2% 7.5% 8.4% 9.0% 412
Other 3.7% 4.5% 10.8% 6.3% 288
Korean 6.6% 2.6% 0.8% 3.4% 153
Japanese 2.8% 6.4% 0.2% 3.1% 143
Italian 1.4% 0.4% 6.9% 2.9% 133
Iranic - Persian 0.7% 0.7% 3.0% 1.5% 68
Hindi 0.7% 1.8% 1.9% 1.5% 67
Indonesian 1.4% 1.4% 0.8% 1.2% 55
Source: ABS, 2006 and Urbis, 2012
5.9 PROPOSED AND APPROVED DEVELOPMENTS
There are a number of proposed and approved development applications (DAs) within Ryde that will contribute to population increases in this area. There are seven proposed or approved developments within Ryde LGA, including the NRSPP. These are predicted to provide additional residential accommodation for up to 15,000 people over the next 20 years. This number inevitably involves some „double counting‟ as it includes NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure (DP&I) projections which capture some of the additional approvals but not the NRSPP or a number of others. The approved and future proposed developments are listed in Table 16 below and illustrated in Figure 5.
TABLE 16 – APPROVED AND FUTURE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN RYDE LGA AS AT JULY2012
ADDRESS LANDOWNER DETAILS STATUS
110-114
Herring Road
Stamford
Grand
Four precincts comprising around 625 residential units
(amounting to around 56,000sqm Gross Floor Area
(GFA) and buildings ranging from 9 to 21 storeys in
height). Limited retail of around 212sqm.
Seeks approval for 2 residential buildings to a
maximum height of 13 storeys (136 apartments of
mixed 1,2,3 bed and 192 car parking spaces)
DGRs issued/no
approval as yet
DGRs issued/no
approval as yet
120-128
Herring Road
Lipman
Properties
Mixed use comprising 4 x 12 storey and 1 x 9 storey
building envelopes (557 apartments) with basement
car parking (667 car spaces), road works and
landscaping
Staged subdivision into 7 allotments comprising 5
All approved.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 PROJECTED FUTURE COMMUNITY PROFILE 29
ADDRESS LANDOWNER DETAILS STATUS
residential allotments and 2 road allotments for access
road
Construction of 1 x 12 storey mixed use
residential/retail buildings providing 123 apartments,
ground floor retail space, 152 basement car spaces
and a new access road.
88 Talavera
Road
St Hilliers An 8 storey hotel building with 151 hotel rooms/suites,
ancillary meeting rooms, bar area, retail area and
theatrette, and 52 car parking accessed from Talavera
Road.
Three residential apartment buildings comprising of 7
storeys, containing 232 apartments with associated
landscaped courtyards, and 235 car parking spaces
accessed off Alma Road.
Landscaping works and improvements to Shrimptons
Creek, the proposed public open space area to the
east of Shrimptons Creek, and public domain works
across the site.
DA377/2007:
Approved and still
valid, however unlikely
to be constructed due
to lack of feasibility in
commercial market
Application currently
being prepared, not
lodged.
Talavera
Road
AMP Capital
Investors
Expansion to the existing centres resulting in an
increase of 31,800sqm GFA comprising a full line
David Jones and approximately 130 new speciality
stores and fresh food market as well as a further 1,050
car spaces.
Approved
Herring Road Macquarie
University
400,000sqm commercial GFA
61,200sqm academic GFA
3,450 beds (student and provision for senior living)
Infrastructure upgrade, improvements to road
Establish integrated landscape open space with
pedestrian/cycle
Car parking structures
Approved
5 Whiteside
Avenue,
North Ryde
EG Funds The subject site is comprised of three lots – 5
Whiteside Street (Lot 6, DP 260000) and 14 and 16
David Avenue (Lots 4 and 3 of DP 25688).
Irregular in shape, the subject site has a combined
area of 1.39 hectares.
The site has frontages to Whiteside Street, David
Avenue and Epping Road. The setback to Epping
Road is approximately 20 metres due to the location of
DGRs issued/no
approval as yet
30 PROJECTED FUTURE COMMUNITY PROFILE URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
ADDRESS LANDOWNER DETAILS STATUS
an RTA-owned road widening reserve.
The site is zoned R2 Low Density Residential under
the Ryde LEP 2010.
213 residential apartments on site, in four blocks
ranging in height from 2 storeys to 8 storeys. This will
include 63 x 1-bedroom apartments, 100 x 2-bedroom
apartments and 50 x 3-bedroom apartments.
Access to the site via Whiteside Street and Epping
Road only, with no access to or from the site via David
Avenue. Whiteside Street will be two-way north of the
entry point to Epping Road, and will remain one-way
south of the entry point to prevent access onto
Parklands Avenue.
Approximately 311 car parking spaces including 4 on-
street visitor parking spaces.
A communal open space in the north of the site closest
to Epping Road.
TBA LaSalle
Investment
Management
co-invest with
the Toga
Group
$200m-plus project to build more than 560 apartments
in Macquarie Park in Sydney's north
Design phase
1-9
Allengrove
Crescent,
116a-122b
Epping Road,
259-263 Lane
Cove Road,
North Ryde
EGC
Custodian
Services
Concept Plan for the demolition of the existing 15
dwellings, excavation of three stepped basement
levels and the construction of 269 residential units in
three blocks:
Block along Epping Road, 112 units, height varying
from 5 to 10/11 storeys
Middle Block, 108 units, height varying from 5 to 11
storeys
Block along Allengrove Crescent, 49 units, height
varying from 4 to 7 storeys
Project refused.
Source: Urbis, 2012
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-01-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AUGUST 2012 PROJECTED FUTURE COMMUNITY PROFILE 31
FIGURE 5 – APPROVED AND FUTURE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS INCLUDING POPULATION FOOTPRINT AS AT SEPTEMBER 2011
Source: Urbis, 2012
32 PROJECTED FUTURE COMMUNITY PROFILE URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
The above figure shows the seven large developments approved or proposed in the Ryde LGA, including the NRSPP. The majority of developments are located within reasonably close proximity of the NRSPP. The population growth expected to result from these developments (projected to be up to 15,000), coupled with the growth generated by the NRSPP, will place increased demand on existing open space and social infrastructure in close proximity to the site.
5.10 SUMMARY OF PROJECTED POPULATION
If the NRSPP attracts a demographic profile similar to the demographic profile of existing residential communities of Chatswood, St Leonards and Top Ryde, the NRSPP may include the following key characteristics:
A high proportion of residents (53.4%) aged 20 to 44 years old
Largest age cohort of 25 to 29 years old (14.5%)
A relatively high proportion of older residents aged 65 years and older (9.0%)
A high percentage of white collar workers
An average annual household income of $77,562
A high percentage of residents who rent from private landlords
A high percentage of couple families with no children (46.3%)
Attract a large proportion of people born overseas, predominately from south-east Asia (China, Hong Kong and Republic of Korea)
A notable Chinese (Cantonese and Mandarin) speaking community.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 33
6 Existing Social Infrastructure
6.1 OVERVIEW
This section provides an overview of existing social infrastructure provision in the City of Ryde LGA and its current operating capacity. Infrastructure and services considered include:
Public transport
Schools
Tertiary Education
Preschools and childcare
Libraries
Aged care
Hospitals and medical services.
6.2 PUBLIC TRANSPORT
The NRSPP is generally well served by transport infrastructure, surrounded by major roads and dissected by a major railway line. The project aims to capitalise on this strategic location in the form of a TOD providing jobs and housing in close proximity to established transport infrastructure.
All proposed development lots within the NRSPP are located within an 800m walkable catchment of public transport with North Ryde Station located in the south of the NRSPP site and Macquarie Park Station located approximately one kilometre north-west. Train lines servicing these stations provide direct access for residents to the City, Epping, Hornsby, Chatswood, North Sydney, Burwood, Strathfield and Eastwood.
In addition to rail services, high frequency bus services provide regular services to the City and other popular destinations. There are a total of six bus routes along Epping Road, nine bus routes along Waterloo Road and seven bus routes along Lane Cove Road. Local residents and visitors are able to access local and regional locations including the City, Manly, Parramatta, Rhodes, Chatswood, Epping, Macquarie University and Macquarie Shopping Centre.
These services provide direct services to key primary and secondary schools located in close proximity to Epping Road and Lane Cove Road, as well as servicing beyond the Ryde LGA boundaries, offering residents with children the option to attend schools beyond the immediate locale. It should be noted that many schools often provide school bus services in addition to public bus routes.
There are also a number of local cycle routes across the Ryde LGA including Epping Road, Pittwater Road and the M2 Motorway.
Figure 6 identifies the seven train stations and number of bus and cycle routes available within the Ryde LGA boundary whilst Figure 7 and Figure 8 (overleaf) outline the bus network services and times within close proximity to the NRSPP
34 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-01-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AUGUST 2012
FIGURE 6 – TRANSPORTATION ROUTES WITHIN RYDE LGA
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 35
Figure 7 – Bus network routes (NRSPP)
Source: TfNSW, 2012
36 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
Figure 8 – STA and Hillsbus services operating via North Ryde
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 37
6.3 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS
6.3.1 OVERVIEW
This section provides an overview of existing school facilities in proximity to the NRSPP site and provides a preliminary assessment of capacity and demand.
There are a total of 20 primary schools within Ryde LGA – comprising 14 public schools and six non-government schools (refer Figure 9). Five secondary schools are located within Ryde LGA – including three public schools and two non-government schools (refer Figure 10).
For the purposes of the social infrastructure audit, three primary schools located outside Ryde LGA have also been included due to their proximity to the precinct (Boronia Park Public School, Hunters Hill, Lane Cove West Public School, Lane Cove West and Mowbray Public School, Lane Cove). Arden Anglican Senior School has also been included but falls outside the Ryde LGA boundaries. Excellent public transport services provide access to these schools as well as those within the LGA providing a variety of schooling choices for future residents
38 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
FIGURE 9 – PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN RYDE LGA AND PROXIMITY
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 39
FIGURE 10 – SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN RYDE LGA AND PROXIMITY
40 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
6.3.2 SCHOOL LOCATION AND CAPACITY
According to best practice for primary schools, a school should be central to its catchment. The DEC guidelines for schools suggest a walkable school radius of 1.6km for primary schools to maximise demand for bus transport and opportunities to walk to school (shown in Figure 10). For secondary schools, an approximate 3.2km radius (driving) has been applied as a reasonable standard (shown in Figure 11). Applying these guidelines provides and understanding of whether future residents and students of the NRSPP are within reasonable distance of schools and therefore provide the basis for assessment of capacity and demand.
Based upon the GIS mapping analysis undertaken for the purposes of this study it can be seen that there are a total of three public primary schools and one non-government primary school within the 1.6km walking radius to the NRSPP site. It can also be seen that there are five secondary schools within Ryde LGA, two of which are located within the 3.2km driving radius of the NRSPP site. Further discussion on capacity and location of these schools is provided below.
In the evaluation of social infrastructure need, the capacity of existing schools to take additional students was assessed. The analysis considered which schools were significantly under the standard provision and which have potential for more students per average square metre. There was significant variation across the catchment in the number of square metres per enrolled student. This shows that some schools are at or over capacity from a standard provision perspective but also shows that others have the potential to increase student densities to pick up extra demand. Table 17 below provides a summary of these findings. Those schools highlighted blue are those that have potential for more students (as measured per average number of square metres per student).
TABLE 17 – EXISTING CAPACITY WITHIN SCHOOLS IN RYDE LGA
NAME GOVERNMENT ADDRESS SUBURB AREA OF
SCHOOL
CURRENT
ENROLMENTS
CURRENT SQM PER
STUDENT
PRIMARY SCHOOLS
Holy Spirit
Primary
School
Non-
government
195 Coxs
Rd North Ryde 3.58 ha 605 Students 59 m2
Our Lady
Queen of
Peace
Non-
government
Westminster
Road Gladesville 2.62 ha 255 Students 103 m2
Northcross
Christian
School
Non-
government
61-65 Lane
Cove Road Ryde 0.56 ha 290 Students 19 m2
St. Anthony‟s
Catholic
Primary
Non-
government
Cnr
Balaclava
Road and
Agincourt
Road Marsfield 3.17 ha 222 Students 143 m2
St. Charles
Borromeo
Cath School
Non-
government
582 Victoria
Road Ryde 2.23 ha 451 Students 49 m2
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 41
NAME GOVERNMENT ADDRESS SUBURB AREA OF
SCHOOL
CURRENT
ENROLMENTS
CURRENT SQM PER
STUDENT
St. Michaels
Catholic
Primary
Non-
government
Maxim
Street Meadowbank 0.81 ha 296 Students 27 m2
St. Therese
Catholic
Primary
Non-
government
448
Blaxland
Road Eastwood 0.42 ha 162 Students 26 m2
East Ryde
Primary
School Public
12-14 Twin
Rd North Ryde 3.51 ha 414 Students 85 m2
North Ryde
Public School Public Cox's Road North Ryde 2.41 ha 248 Students 97 m2
Truscott
Street Public
School Public Truscott St North Ryde 2.10 ha 305 Students 69 m2
Ryde Public
School Public Pope St Ryde 3.66 ha 389 Students 94 m2
Denistone
East Public Public Lovell Rd Eastwood 2.94 ha 829 Students 35 m2
Eastwood
Heights
Public Public
Lincoln
Street Eastwood 2.22 ha 337 Students 66 m2
Eastwood
Public Public Rowe St Eastwood 2.32 ha 690 Students 34 m2
Ermington
Public Public
Winbourne
St West Ryde 2.12 ha 465 Students 46 m2
Gladesville
Public Public Victoria Rd Gladesville 2.90 ha 391 Students 74 m2
Meadowbank
Public Public
Thistle
Street Ryde 3.37 ha 159 Students 212 m2
Putney
Public Public
193
Morrison
Road Putney 1.80 ha 405 Students 44 m2
42 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
NAME GOVERNMENT ADDRESS SUBURB AREA OF
SCHOOL
CURRENT
ENROLMENTS
CURRENT SQM PER
STUDENT
West Ryde
Public Public
6 Endeavour
Street West Ryde 1.63 ha 313 Students 52 m2
Boronia Park
Public School Public
113
Pittwater Rd Hunters Hill 0.79 ha 376 Students 21 m2
Mowbray
Public School Public
635
Mowbray
Road Lane Cove 4.0 ha 304 Students 131m2
Lane Cove
West Public
School Public
80 Avalon
Avenue Lane Cove 1.7ha 435 Students 40m2
SECONDARY SCHOOLS
Holy Cross
Catholic
College
Non-
government
517 Victoria
Road Ryde 11.20 ha 546 Students 205 m2
Marist
College
Eastwood
Non-
government
44 Hillview
Road Eastwood 3.32 ha 705 Students 47 m2
Epping Boys
High Public
213 Vimiera
Road Eastwood 12.17 ha 1114 Students 109 m2
Marsden
High Public
22a
Winbourne
St West Ryde 8.51 ha 747 Students 114 m2
Ryde
Secondary
College Public
5 Malvina
Street Ryde 4.04 ha 938 Students 43 m2
Arden
Anglican
Senior
School
Non-
government
50 Oxford
St, Epping 9869 2644 2.22 ha 659 Students 34 m2
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 43
Further, Table 18 below shows the average enrolments for primary and secondary non-government and public schools within Ryde LGA.
TABLE 18 – CURRENT SCHOOLS IN CATCHMENT SUMMARY
SCHOOLS TOTAL ENROLED AVERAGE ENROLMENT
Total primary schools 22 8341 379
Non-government 7 2281 326
Public 15 6060 404
Total sec. schools 6 4709 785
Non-government 3 1910 637
Public 3 2799 933
Grand total 28 13050 466
Table 19 below illustrates the new school demand to 2031 for the different catchments based upon DoPI population projections.
TABLE 19 – PROJECTED DEMAND SCHOOL ENROLMENTS - 2013
NEW DEMAND BY
2031 (BASED ON
DOPI)
WALKING (1.6KM) POTENTIAL
ENROLMENTS
DRIVING (3.2KM) POTENTIAL
ENROLMENTS
RYDE LGA
POTENTIAL
ENROLMENTS
Age 5-11 Primary 45 305 1443
Age 12-17 Secondary 39 261 1236
Subtotal 84 566 2678
NEW DEMAND BY
2031 (FROM NEW
DEVELOPMENT IN
CATCHMENT)
WALKING (1.6KM) DRIVING (3.2KM) RYDE LGA
Age 5-11 Primary 464 911 942
Age 12-17 Secondary 397 781 807
Subtotal 861 1692 1749
TOTAL DEMAND WALKING (1.6KM) DRIVING (3.2KM) RYDE LGA
Age 5-11 Primary 509 1216 2384
Age 12-17 Secondary 436 1042 2043
Total 945 2258 4427
44 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
Table 20 illustrates that with the use of the Ryde benchmark there is potential capacity within the local schools (1.6km radius) to accommodate an additional 134 primary school students.
TABLE 20 – STANDARDS OF PRIMARY SCHOOLS WITHIN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE SITE (1.6KM)
NAME ADDRESS AREA
SQM
CURRENT
ENROLMENTS
CURRENT
SQM PER
STUDENT
POTENTIAL
CAPACITY
FROM
STANDARDS
CURRENTLY
OVER OR
UNDER
Holy Spirit
Primary
School
195 Coxs
Rd
35,837
m2 605 Students 59 m
2 527 -78
Over
Standard
East Ryde
Primary
School
12-14 Twin
Rd
35,126
m2 414 Students 85 m
2 517 103
Under
Standard
North Ryde
Public
School Cox's Road
24,082
m2 248 Students 97 m
2 354 106
Under
Standard
Truscott
Street Public
School Truscott St
20,990
m2 305 Students 69 m
2 309 4
Under
Standard
Total of
potential
capacity 134
Figure 11 and Figure 12 illustrate the comparison between enrolments and capacity at schools within the Ryde LGA. The size of the circle indicates the number of students enrolled – the larger the circle, the higher the number of school students. The lighter the colour of the circle, the more capacity the school has.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 45
FIGURE 11 – RYDE LGA PRIMARY SCHOOLS
46 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
FIGURE 12 – RYDE LGA SECONDARY SCHOOLS
URBIS SOCIAL_IMPACT_ASSESSMENT_FINAL_22 NOVEMBER 2012.DOCX EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 47
6.4 TERTIARY EDUCATION
There are a total of four key tertiary education institutions within Ryde LGA. These include:
Macquarie University
Ryde TAFE - Northern Sydney Institute
Meadowbank TAFE - Northern Sydney Institute
Morling Theological College
Figure 13 overleaf shows the location of these institutions in relation to the NRSPP site.
The major tertiary institution in Ryde LGA is Macquarie University, one of New South Wales‟ leading Universities. Macquarie University offers a range of courses including general arts and science degrees as well as law, economics and commerce, information technology (IT), education, medicine, allied health, engineering, social sciences, environmental sciences and planning. Students are understood to attend from both the Ryde area and the greater Sydney population. Macquarie University is accessible by train and bus for both local and regional students. The university also has a number of on-site student accommodation areas. According to the City of Ryde, Macquarie University currently holds 32,500 staff and students which are projected to increase to 55,000 by 2031
2.
Meadowbank TAFE located near Meadowbank railway station offers a range of trades and engineering courses, visual arts courses, business and accounting, community services courses, IT, allied health and fitness, and occupational health and safety (OH&S).
Ryde TAFE offers a range of courses in the hospitality industry; horticulture, land management and garden design; floristry; and events and tourism.
Morling Theological College is a Baptist College offering Bachelor‟s degrees and Certificate qualifications in a range of theological and ministry studies.
UTS Ku-ring-gai Campus (not located in Figure 13), while outside the Ryde LGA is accessible from Ryde via bus and connects with trains from Chatswood station. It is approximately 3.8 km from North Ryde Station. Its faculties include arts and social sciences; business; tourism, design, architecture and building; engineering; law; nursing; and science. The UTS Ku-ring-gai Campus and Macquarie University are located within close proximity to the NRSPP site. The universities provide local residents with a broad choice of course options within close proximity to where they live.
2 Ryde City Council, Community Facilities: Future Directions, p. 39
48 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE URBIS
SOCIAL_IMPACT_ASSESSMENT_FINAL_22 NOVEMBER 2012.DOCX
FIGURE 13 – TERTIARY EDUCATION WITHIN RYDE LGA
URBIS SOCIAL_IMPACT_ASSESSMENT_FINAL_22 NOVEMBER 2012.DOCX EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 49
6.5 PRESCHOOLS AND CHILDCARE CENTRES
There are 34 childcare centres and 10 preschools within Ryde LGA. There are a high proportion of long day care centres and preschools within the suburb of North Ryde, with nine childcare/long day care centres and two preschools. Others are located in the suburbs of Ryde, East Ryde, West Ryde, Gladesville, Meadowbank and Macquarie Park. Figure 14 overleaf shows the location of childcare services and preschools within Ryde LGA.
As part of the social infrastructure audit, telephone interviews were undertaken with a number of childcare centres and preschool operators. A total of nine telephone interviews were conducted, with five of these being undertaken with Directors at centres in North Ryde.
Of the nine centres interviewed, seven were operating at capacity, and two were operating almost at capacity i.e. they had limited vacancies on one day of the week only. All interviewees cited a high demand in the Ryde area for child care, in particular in the suburb of North Ryde. Further, research was conducted of the data available on the Care for Kids Online Website
3. This website provides vacancy
rates within childcare centres across NSW. It was determined that 20/34 (59%) childcare centres and 2/10 (20%) preschools currently have some vacancies within Ryde LGA
3 Care for kids online, Australia‟s online childcare resource, childcare centre search, 2011, viewed at:
http://www.careforkids.com.au/search/regions.asp?stateID=1&ct=&ut=4&ctype=
50 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE URBIS
SOCIAL_IMPACT_ASSESSMENT_FINAL_22 NOVEMBER 2012.DOCX
FIGURE 14 – CHILDCARE AND PRESCHOOLS WITHIN RYDE LGA
URBIS SOCIAL_IMPACT_ASSESSMENT_FINAL_22 NOVEMBER 2012.DOCX EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 51
6.6 LIBRARIES
There are a total of five libraries located within the Ryde LGA shown at Figure 15 below. They include Main Library – Ryde, Gladesville Library, North Ryde Library, Eastwood Library and West Ryde Library.
All five libraries are owned and run by the City of Ryde Council and it is understood that the City of Ryde intends to continue to maintain libraries in the LGA, with no plans to privatise services.
Library branches in the LGA are well used and valued by the community. All branches are well serviced and are fairly advanced in their use of technology (e.g. Wi-Fi). Programs are available for children, young people, the elderly and multicultural groups (e.g. story reading, bilingual story reading, home library service for older residents). There is a major Chinese book and resource collection, as well as smaller Korean and Tamil collections.
52 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE URBIS
SOCIAL_IMPACT_ASSESSMENT_FINAL_22 NOVEMBER 2012.DOCX
FIGURE 15 – LIBRARIES WITHIN RYDE LGA
URBIS SOCIAL_IMPACT_ASSESSMENT_FINAL_22 NOVEMBER 2012.DOCX EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 53
6.7 COMMUNITY FACILITIES
According to the City of Ryde‟s Community Facilities: Future Directions4 document, there are over 60
Council-run community buildings throughout the Ryde LGA. These buildings range from small meeting rooms to halls and tennis centres, and include 14 community halls, four meeting rooms and seven community facilities. Many of these facilities are open to hire and can accommodate a range of public uses. There are two senior citizen facilities (the Eastwood Senior Citizens Centre and the Eastwood Woman‟s Rest Centre) in Ryde, as well as two art facilities and venues (Willandra House/Gallery and Argyle Theatre).
There are a further two community halls located in Lane Cove and two located in Epping.
In addition to Council run community facilities, the Ryde LGA contains a number of privately operated facilities and services. Some of these services include; New Horizons Enterprises, Northern Sydney Carer Support Service, the Multicultural Community Advisory Service and Catholic Community Services. These services provide support, activities, education opportunities and accommodation to young people, families, people with disability, older people, and people from non-English speaking backgrounds.
Figure 16 overleaf provides the location of the community halls, facilities and meeting rooms within Ryde LGA.
Facilities specifically provided for young people in Ryde LGA are generally limited to clubs and halls. There are very few youth centres located within Ryde LGA, other than the North Ryde RSL „Youth Club‟ that offers a range of sporting and fitness activities. Anecdotally, evidence suggests that this facility is at capacity and the next closest youth centre is located in Epping. It should be noted that the City of Ryde Community Facilities Plan and consultation with City of Ryde open space planners both identify gaps in provision of facilities and services for young people. Possible facilities listed within the Section 94 Contributions Plan identified to meet this demand include skate parks, a youth centre and multi-purpose arts centre. The use of school halls by the broader community as required for those funded by the Building Education Revolution Funding has increased supply, however City of Ryde Council reports continuing under provision.
Within the Ryde LGA there are 20 community centres providing before and after school care, with some also providing vacation care. Four of these centres are located within North Ryde, and operate from the following locations: Holy Spirit Primary School; Ryde East Primary School; North Ryde Public School; and Truscott Street Public School. The four facilities located within the suburb of North Ryde were contacted by phone. All indicated that they had some capacity on some days of the week, although noting that they are at capacity on other days.
4 City of Ryde, 2010, Community Facilities: Future Directions
54 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE URBIS
SOCIAL_IMPACT_ASSESSMENT_FINAL_22 NOVEMBER 2012.DOCX
FIGURE 16 – COMMUNITY HALLS, COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND MEETING ROOMS
URBIS SOCIAL_IMPACT_ASSESSMENT_FINAL_22 NOVEMBER 2012.DOCX EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 55
6.8 MEDICAL CENTRES AND HOSPITALS
There are five hospitals, 15 medical centres and over 25 speciality medical services available within the Ryde LGA. Figure 17 overleaf shows the location of these hospitals as well as local medical centres, relative to the NRSPP site.
6.8.1 HOSPITALS
The Ryde LGA is well serviced for hospitals, with five located in the Ryde LGA and the Royal North Shore Hospital located approximately 5.5km south east of the NRSPP site. All of the hospitals in Ryde LGA fall within the Northern Sydney Local Health District. Some of the services available at these hospitals are discussed below.
Ryde Hospital and Community Health Services are located approximately 7.5 km from the NRSPP site. The hospital provides inpatient and community services, including emergency department and intensive care, elective surgery and day surgery, maternity, orthopaedics, and cardiac services and mental health. Community Health Services include dental, aged care, rehabilitation, diabetes, child, adolescent and family health, mental health, drug and alcohol and health promotion.
Macquarie University Hospital is less than 5km from the site. It is a private hospital providing surgery and specialists, cancer care, allied health, imaging, pathology and sports injury treatment.
Royal North Shore Hospital is a major post graduate teaching and research hospital. It has an emergency department with a major trauma centre and intensive care support, pain management, cardiology unit, a burns unit, oncology and neonatal intensive care. The hospital is currently undergoing a major upgrade. North Shore Private Hospital, on the Royal North Shore site provides a range of clinical services and general surgical services including cardiography, maternity, oncology, intensive care and rehabilitation.
The Royal Rehabilitation Centre located in Ryde provides rehabilitation services for adults with disabilities arising from spinal cord injury, occupational injury, orthopaedic injury, amputations, age related illness, neurological illness and traumatic brain injury. Some of these services are being moved off site and some redevelopment of the current site is taking place.
6.8.2 MEDICAL CENTRES AND SPECIALITY SERVICES
There are approximately 15 medical centres within Ryde LGA, as well as over 25 speciality medical services and allied health services. Speciality and allied health services provide radiology, physiotherapy, speech pathology, hearing services, podiatry, pain management and urology and gynaecology assistance.
Four general practitioners and medical centres are located in North Ryde. Consultation undertaken with the managers of these practices indicated that services have some capacity to take on new patients.
56 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE URBIS
SOCIAL_IMPACT_ASSESSMENT_FINAL_22 NOVEMBER 2012.DOCX
FIGURE 17 – HOSPITALS AND MEDICAL CENTRES LOCATED WITHIN RYDE LGA
URBIS SOCIAL_IMPACT_ASSESSMENT_FINAL_22 NOVEMBER 2012.DOCX EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 57
6.9 AGED CARE
There are 45 aged care services and facilities operating in the Ryde LGA, including high and low care residential services, retirement villages, day cares, social groups and specialist medical services. Figure 18 below shows the location of aged care facilities and services within the Ryde LGA.
There are 24 residential services available (refer Table 21 and Figure 18) including high care facilities, low care housing (including hostels and serviced apartments) and self-care/independent living units (ILUs). Organisations providing aged care services within the North Ryde area include Baptist Care Services – Care Centre Northern Sydney, KinCare and Catholic Care Services. Interviews with some key community based support providers suggest that these services are well used by the greater Ryde community.
It is noted that there is one residential aged care facility within the suburb of North Ryde, namely the New Horizons Aged Care Facility that provides 78 high care beds.
TABLE 21 – AGED CARE FACILITIES IN RYDE LGA
NAME SUBURB DESCRIPTION
New Horizons Aged Care facility North Ryde High level care. 78 beds
BCS Cooinda Court Hostel Marsfield Low care hostel accommodation for 67
BCS Care Centre Northern Suburbs. Short Term Care Support
Marsfield Short term (6 week) care program
Dorothy Henderson Lodge Marsfield Hostel accommodation for 79 residents of which 13 are in a secure unit.
BCS Shalom Centre Marsfield High care facility including a high care dementia specific unit.
BCS Willandra Village Marsfield Independent living units, low care accommodation and high care facility
Presbyterian Aged Care - Eastwood (Woolway)
Marsfield 23 independent living units
Southern Cross Village Marsfield 72 independent living units and 40 residential care apartments.
San Antonio da Padova Protettore Di Poggioreale Sydney Nursing Home Ltd
Ryde 40 high care places, 10 dementia specific low care.
Rotherham Nursing Home Ryde 40 place high care
Mary Potter Nursing Home Ryde 63 bed high care, 21 dementia specific
Marian Hostel Ryde 48 low care places
Clermont Nursing Home Ryde 55 high care places
Thomas Bowden Retirement Village Ryde Retirement village (ILUs) plus 47 low care/ assisted living places.
Dalton Gardens Ryde Independent living units
Ashburn House Aged Care Gladesville 23 low care, 84 high care places
Warrigal Care Gladesville Gladesville 36 low care places, 1 respite
Fernleigh Nursing Home West Ryde 72 high care places
St Catherine's Aged Care Services Ltd Eastwood Combination of high care, low care, rehabilitation and day care.
Vimiera Village Eastwood 92 self-care, 52 assisted living
Living Choice Leisure Lea Eastwood 112 independent living units, 25 assisted care
Bethany Nursing Home/ Hostel Eastwood High care and low care
Ann Maria Aged Care Facility Gladesville High care
58 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE URBIS
SOCIAL_IMPACT_ASSESSMENT_FINAL_22 NOVEMBER 2012.DOCX
FIGURE 18 – AGED CARE FACILITIES AND SERVICES
URBIS SOCIAL_IMPACT_ASSESSMENT_FINAL_22 NOVEMBER 2012.DOCX EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE 59
Eight telephone interviews were undertaken with service providers to discuss trends in service usage, current capacity and plans for expansion. In regard to the make-up of aged care service users, as well as incoming populations, services indicate that the majority of people within residential aged care facilities (including self-care, low care and high care) generally move to these facilities from within the Ryde LGA, including North Ryde, or have family in the local area. Facilities consulted with identified some need for additional aged care services in the LGA, in particular dementia specific, high care and low care places. A current lack of promotion for community based wellness programs (e.g. stroke prevention) was also identified.
With regard to vacancies in aged care facilities, the New Horizons Aged Care facility in Ryde is currently at capacity. While there are no plans to provide additional aged care services in future, six assisted living units are planned for young people with disability. Consultation undertaken with other service providers, as well as a review of relevant literature and policy, indicates that many of these facilities and services are also at or nearing capacity, however waiting periods are reportedly fairly short. A number of services also indicated plans to expand services in coming years.
These findings regarding capacity were confirmed by further research undertaken using the DPS „Guide to Aged Care‟ website
5, that provides an overview of current vacancy rates within key aged care services
across Australia. Two facilities in Ryde suburb (Pindari Village and Thomas Bowden Village) and one facility in Eastwood (St Catherine‟s Aged Care Services) indicated they had vacancies.
5 DPS Guide to Aged Care, 2006 – 2011, viewed at: http://www.agedcareguide.com.au/
60 SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
7 Social Infrastructure Assessment
7.1 SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS
Urbis Public Policy undertook a social infrastructure audit and needs assessment in respect of the NRSPP in order to inform the design phase of the project. The assessment considered the need for social infrastructure and services within the NRSPP in light of the local policy context, available standards and benchmarks, current and projected demographic characteristics and existing local infrastructure and services.
The Infrastructure Needs Analysis included the following key tasks:
Review of relevant local and state government documents relating to provision of infrastructure – standards and benchmarks.
Analysis of local demographic characteristics and population projections (as described in Sections 4 and 5 of this report).
Audit of existing local infrastructure including GIS mapping.
Evaluation of the capacity of these facilities based on discussions with the City of Ryde Council, a limited number of informal telephone interviews with service providers to identify capacity, vacancies, trends and usage (described in Section 6).
Analysis of the likely future demand for social infrastructure drawing on the application of benchmarks to population estimates, stakeholder views and participation trends.
7.2 BENCHMARKS
The following provides a high level overview of some available benchmarks for the provision of infrastructure within Ryde LGA. These benchmarks have been drawn from a variety of sources, including guidelines for new release areas (Growth Centres Commission, (GCC)) and Ryde City Councils Section 94 Development Contributions Plan.
It is important to note that while benchmarks provide a guide to the provision required, there are many contextual factors also influencing the facilities that may be required. For instance, the application of benchmarks must also consider what facilities and services are currently available, how these facilities are used and whether there are vacancies or capacity in these services. The characteristics of the incoming population, including how the population is expected to evolve, are also an important consideration.
It is also noted that some benchmarks, despite being used as a guide by a variety of consent authorities, are many years old and subsequently may no longer be realistic for modern developments and densities. Subsequently, benchmarks have not been the determining factor for the provision of social infrastructure within the NRSPP.
7.2.1 SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE BENCHMARKS
Table 22 overleaf illustrates the recognised standards and benchmarks for the provision of social infrastructure and services. Benchmarks can provide an evidence base for provision requirements; however the exact built form and scale of recommended facilities should be determined at the Structure Planning and design phases and with regard for policy directions for social infrastructure provision. This includes co-location of facilities or multipurpose centres, which provide efficiencies in terms of infrastructure costs and required land take. Further, in applying existing benchmarks and formulas in relation schools, it is important to consider the size/land take of existing schools as inner urban schools generally have a smaller footprint than in greenfield sites, which is often the basis of current benchmarks.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT 61
TABLE 22 – STANDARDS AND BENCHMARKS FOR SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE
FACILITY/ SERVICE STANDARD SOURCE LAND REQUIREMENT
Community centre GCC standard – 1: 6,000 people (local)
GCC standard – 1: 20,000 people
(district)
City of Ryde S.94 – 1 per 7,000 –
10,000 people
GCC standard[1]
City of Ryde S.94[2]
600-800m2
Youth centre City of Ryde S.94 – 1 per 20,000 people
or 1 per 3,000 13-19 year olds
City of Ryde S.94[3]
300-400m2
Seniors centre 1 per 30,000 people City of Ryde S.94[4]
1,000-2000m2
Library GCC standard 1: 33,000 people
(branch);
GCC standard 1: 40,000 people
(district)
GCC standard 1:30,000 people
City of Ryde S.94 1 per 5,000 people
(branch)
City of Ryde S.94 1 per 30,000 people
(district)
GCC standard[5]
City of Ryde S.94[6]
Branch: 600m2 –
2,400m2
District: 1,000m2 –
2,400m2
Arts/cultural centre:
0.24 – 8 ha
Hospital GCC standard – 2 beds: 1,000 people GCC standard[7]
-
Child care GCC standard 1: 5 children (0-4 years) GCC standard[8]
-
Outside school
hours care
and vacation care
GCC standard 1 place: 25 children 5-12
years
GCC standard[9]
-
Primary school 1.6km walking radius (DEC)
GCC standard approx. 1: 1,500 new
dwellings
DEC standard[10]
GCC standard[11]
3ha / 2.3 (if joint use)
[1] Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
[2] City of Ryde Council, Section 94 Development Contributions Plan, December 2007.
[3] City of Ryde Council, Section 94 Development Contributions Plan, December 2007.
[4] City of Ryde Council, Section 94 Development Contributions Plan, December 2007.
[5] Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
[6] City of Ryde Council, Section 94 Development Contributions Plan, December 2007.
[7] Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
[8] Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
[9] Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
[10] Bankstown LEP 2001 AND Bankstown DCP 2005, Issues Paper, Review of planning requirements for schools in the City of
Bankstown, 2009, p. 12. [11]
Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
62 SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
FACILITY/ SERVICE STANDARD SOURCE LAND REQUIREMENT
Secondary school 3.2km driving radius (Urbis)
GCC standard approx. 1: 4,500 new
dwellings
Urbis approximation
standard (based on
DEC 1.6km
walkable
standard)[12]
GCC standard[13]
6ha or 10ha if combined
K-12 + special needs
school facilities
Aged care facilities DoHA standard: 88 high and low care
RAC places per 1,000 population aged
70+
GCC standard: Aged care housing –
1:10,000 centre
GCC standard: High care (Nursing
Home) – 40 beds: 1,000 people 70+
years
GCC standard: Low care (Hostel) – 48
places: 1,000 people 70+ years
Department of Health
and Ageing
(DoHA)[14]
GCC standard[15]
GCC standard[16]
GCC standard[17]
-
7.3 SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Table 23 below assesses the provision of social infrastructure in the NRSPP against relevant benchmarks, and in consideration of the influencing factors described above including local context, population characteristics and the nature of the development as a TOD.
TABLE 23 – ASSESSMENT OF SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE
ELEMENT EVALUATION
Public transport The NRSPP by its very nature as a TOD aims to capitalise upon existing, established
transport infrastructure. As discussed previously, the site is well serviced by a range
of public transport that provides access to surrounding suburbs, services and key
commercial and business districts. This is significant as residents within an area will
often travel beyond their immediate surrounds to access district and regional services
and facilities, for example Secondary schools.
In this respect, the NRSPP is considered well placed for a true TOD, taking
advantage of its location within walking distance of two railway stations and a variety
of high frequency bus services.
The improved connections to these transport services, as proposed by the NRSPP
will encourage greater public transport usage from both the development itself and
[12] Urbis, 2011
[13] Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
[14] Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA) (2007a) 2007 Aged Care Approvals Round: Essential Guide.
[15] Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
[16] Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
[17] Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT 63
ELEMENT EVALUATION
surrounding areas with a subsequent reduction in demand for travel via private
vehicle. The NRSPP also adopts lower than standard car parking rates for the area,
further driving the mode shift.
Schools – primary and
secondary
Section 6.3 of the report identifies schools within a walkable catchment of the NRSPP
and assesses their capacity to take additional students. It can be seen that there are
a number of small to medium sized schools located within close proximity to the
NRSPP, of which some have capacity. Medium to large schools by enrolment are
located further from the site and are closer to capacity.
In 2006 there were 14,459 school age students in Ryde LGA. The enrolment in all
schools in 2011 in Ryde LGA was 11,652. This shows an existing potential shortfall of
2,807 however this could be contributed to secondary students attending schools
outside the Ryde LGA, most likely private or other government schools.
There is potential demand to 2031 for an additional six primary schools and two
secondary schools within the Ryde LGA to cater for a predicted new school age
population of 4,427 children. Some capacity has been identified within some of the
existing schools which have a low ratio of students per square metre of school site
area. Some of these are within close proximity to the NRSPP site.
There is expected to be an additional 945 and 2,258 school aged students within the
1.6km and 3.2km school catchments respectively by 2031. This creates the demand
for three new primary schools and one new secondary school within these catchment
areas.
A number of the primary schools within a close proximity to the NRSPP site have a
high number of square metres per student and therefore potential capacity for
expansion; this was also suggested by the DEC. The four primary schools within the
1.6km radius of the site have potential capacity considering the sizes of the school‟s
land area and the number of currently enrolled students. Based upon the use of the
Ryde benchmark there is potential capacity within these schools (1.6km radius) to
accommodate an additional 134 primary school students.
As stated earlier in this report, TfNSW met with the DEC to discuss educational
implications associated with the NRSPP site. It was agreed that given access
constraints, the NRSPP site is not an ideal strategic location for a new school and
that an additional school on the site may only cater for the local future population. The
possibility of upgrading current local schools to cater for increases in population was
instead suggested. This was confirmed in a letter from DEC to the DP&I (Appendix A)
Tertiary education Additional tertiary education institutions are unlikely to be needed as a result of new
developments within the area. The City of Ryde‟s Community Facilities: Future
Directions6 acknowledged however that provision of social infrastructure for the large
number of students travelling through the Ryde LGA is a key challenge in service
provision. The additional services and facilities provided through the NRSPP, such as
retail services, the community centre and additional open space would also be
6 Ryde City Council, Community Facilities: Future Directions, p. 40
64 SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
ELEMENT EVALUATION
available to service the student community as needed.
Preschools and childcare
centres
Population growth resulting from the NRSPP is anticipated to generate demand for
additional childcare services in the local area. For instance, applying the City of Ryde
Council standard for provision of long day care of one place per 11 children between
0 and 4 years, an additional 223 children within this age group (as determined at
Section 5 above) will generate demand for an additional 20 places. Consideration
may therefore be given to the provision of a purpose built childcare facility at the
NRSPP site, however it is acknowledged this will be addressed commercially at later
stages of development as demand arises. Provision for a community centre has been
made within the planning for the precinct and this provides an opportunity for the
incorporation of child care if deemed appropriate.
Medical centres and
hospitals
Based on consultation with service providers and the large number of hospitals
available in the LGA and further afield, there is not deemed to be a need for
additional medical facilities to be provided within the NRSPP, however it would be
expected that there would be demand for commercial space for medical and allied
heath related activities. The NRSPP provides opportunities for conveniently located
commercial/retail floorspace which could accommodate these types of services.
Aged care and independent
living units
There is a projected cumulative increase in population of 15,000 from proposed
developments in the area. Based on the benchmark threshold adopted by SGS
Economics and Planning (1 aged care facility per 60,000 people)7, the provision of
aged care services is not a priority for this locale. This conclusion is also reached
using the benchmark standard for aged care facilities outlined in the Ryde City
Council Section 94 Development Contributions Plan (1 aged care facility per 30,000
people)8.
Previous research undertaken by Urbis for UnitingCare Ageing within the Northern
Sydney Health Region used the NSW Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA)
benchmark of 88 high and low care Residential Aged Care (RAC) places per 1,000
population aged 70+(DoHA, 2007a9). At the time of the research (2007) it was
predicted that by 2011 Ryde LGA‟s ratio of RAC places would be 10.9 places per
person aged 70+. It is noted that there is a move underway to separate care and
accommodation and there may be a subsequent need for Independent Living Units
(ILUs) in some areas. The City of Ryde Council Affordable Housing Strategy Stage 1
Final Background Report similarly acknowledges that, while ILUs are currently well
supplied in Ryde LGA, there is an expected shortfall towards 2031.
As stated previously, a number of stakeholder interviews were undertaken with aged
care providers in the Ryde LGA. Through anecdotal evidence there may be scope to
provide ILUs within the NRSPP at later stages on the project site but it is considered
unnecessary at this point.
7 SGS Economics and Planning, M2/Delhi Road Land Use Assessment Draft Report, November 2010
8 City of Ryde Council, Section 94 Development Contributions Plan, December 2007
9 Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA) (2007a) 2007 Aged Care Approvals Round: Essential Guide
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT 65
ELEMENT EVALUATION
Libraries The current provision of five libraries meets the base standard for 150,000 population
(Council standard of 1 library per 30,000 people). There is currently no need for an
additional library within Ryde LGA. However, with a predicted additional 48,000
people to 2031 within Ryde LGA overall, there may be a need to consider a new
library facility in the future, outside the scope of the NRSPP.
Community facilities In order to meet the Council standard of one community centre per 10,000 people,
five community centres are required in the Ryde LGA (based on a 2006 population of
100,900 people). Furthermore, the NSW DP&I have projected Ryde‟s population to
increase to 148,000 by 2031, which coupled with population increase generated by
new developments in the area, will almost certainly create demand for these
additional community centres.
To meet this need a community centre and associated half basketball court and open
space is recommended on the western edge of the M2 site as part of the NRSPP.
The provision of this facility will be confirmed as part of the ongoing consultation that
will be undertaken with Council regarding Section 94 contributions for the site.
Provision of a community facility would align with the suggestion of Council‟s
Community Facilities: Future Directions document that iconic community facilities can
be provided in major development projects, such as those in the MPC, Ryde Town
Centre and West Ryde.
The Community Facilities: Future Directions document identifies multi-purpose
spaces as a key gap in the provision of community facilities in the LGA. The co-
location of facilities, in centres where people naturally congregate are all City of Ryde
identified best-practice principles able to be adhered to by providing a multi-purpose
within the NRSPP. Council also suggests the co-location of community facilities with
key destinations such as parks, recreation centres, shops, transport nodes, and
health care providers.
For reference, a number of best-practice case studies of multi-purpose community
centres were considered in the design process for the NRSPP and the analysis
revealed that a multi-purpose centre should provide flexible spaces, capable of
accommodating the diverse and changing needs of the community.
The co-location of the community facilities and open space is representative of the
best practice principles described above. The community centre proposed as part of
the NRSPP is well located, close to the major allocation of open space, with a high
level of pedestrian connectivity, particularly from the south due to the existing
pedestrian bridge which links the existing residential areas of North Ryde. This not
only makes the NRSPP site attractive for future residents but enables access for
current residents of North Ryde.
The multi-purpose design of the facility including active recreational facilities e.g. a
basketball court responds to identified needs in the existing community. Assuming the
proposed community centre will cater for the broader community beyond the
incoming residents, an approximate area of over 2,000 square metres for this facility
was considered appropriate, and a total area of approximately 2,500 square metres
has been provided for.
66 SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
ELEMENT EVALUATION
The DCP provides guidance for the design of public open space to be provided on
the site. This includes a playground, a BBQ area, outdoor gym circuit and opportunity
for a café adjoining Blenheim Park. The passive open space areas across the
NRSPP will be enhanced by these embellishments and will introduce places for local
and neighbouring residents to gather and form relationships with the new precinct.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 EXISTING OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES 67
8 Existing Open Space and Recreation Facilities
8.1 OVERALL OPEN SPACE
According to the City of Ryde‟s Parks on Track for People 2025 document, there are 355 hectares of parkland in the Ryde LGA. There are a total of 207 parks, 98 of which include playground equipment. There are also a number of smaller pocket parks in the LGA, however these have been omitted for the purposes of this audit.
A desktop audit identified 42 Council managed parks and open spaces in the Ryde LGA (excluding pocket parks), 27 of which include sports fields and ovals. Six of these open spaces are in North Ryde, including the newly opened sports complex at the ELS Hall Park. These parks and sports fields are listed in Table 24 and more detail about parks and open space in the vicinity of the NRSPP is provided in the following sections.
TABLE 24 – COUNCIL MANAGED OPEN SPACE IN THE RYDE LGA
SUBURB NAME ADDRESS
North Ryde ELS Hall Park and sports centre Kent Rd, North Ryde
North Ryde Common Wicks Rd, North Ryde
Blenheim Park Blenheim Rd, North Ryde
North Ryde Park Cressy Rd, North Ryde
Field of Mars Reserve Pittwater Rd, North Ryde
Yinnell Reserve Gilda St, North Ryde
Marsfield Dunbar Park Sobraon Road, Marsfield
Marsfield Park Vimiera Road , Marsfield
Pioneer Park Balaclava Road, Marsfield
Waterloo Park Waterloo Road, Marsfield
Macquarie Park Christie Park Christie Road, Macquarie Park
Fontenoy Park Fontenoy Road, Macquarie Park
Tuckwell Park Tuckwell Place, Macquarie Park
Wilga Reserve Cottonwood Cres, Macquarie Park
East Ryde Magdala Park Magdala Rd, East Ryde
Ryde Santa Rosa Park Bridge Rd, Ryde
Anderson Park Belmore Street, Ryde
Bennelong Park Waterview Street, Ryde
Gannan Park Buna Street, Ryde
68 EXISTING OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
SUBURB NAME ADDRESS
Helene Park 33 Blaxland Road, Ryde
Pidding Park Pidding Road, Ryde
Ryde Park Blaxland Road, Ryde
Yamble Reserve Quarry Road, Ryde
West Ryde Anzac Park Wattle Street, West Ryde
Darvall Park Chatham Road, West Ryde
Lions Park Victoria Road, West Ryde
Gladesville Banjo Paterson Park Punt Road, Gladesville
Bremner Park Morrison Road, Gladesville
Monash Park Ryde Road, Gladesville
Peel Park Stanbury Street, Gladesville
Tyagarah Park Tyagarah Street, Gladesville
Westminster Park Westminster Road, Gladesville
Eastwood Brush Farm Park Lawson Street, Eastwood
Eastwood Park Lakeside Road, Eastwood
Forrestor Park Vimiera Road, Eastwood
Glen Reserve Glen Street, Eastwood
Meadowbank Meadowbank Park Constitution Road, Meadowbank
Memorial Park Meadow Crescent, Meadowbank
Putney Cleves Park Douglas Street, Putney
Kissing Point Park Waterview Street, Putney
Morrison Bay Park Frances Road, Putney
Putney Park Pellisier Road, Putney
Open space has been identified as being in short supply relative to existing demand. Both passive and active open spaces are by traditional standards
10, undersupplied in the Ryde LGA. If areas of passive
recreation, garden areas, paved areas and parklands such as the Lane Cove National Park are accumulated, the City of Ryde almost meets the National Playing Fields Association Standard for outdoor play, games, sport and other physical recreation of 2.4ha per 1,000 people. Table 25 below outlines this shortfall.
10 Parks on Track for People 2025
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 EXISTING OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES 69
TABLE 25 – TAKEN FROM CITY OF RYDE 2006, PARKS ON TRACK FOR PEOPLE 2025
NATIONAL PLAYING FIELDS
ASSOCIATION STANDARD
(PER 1,000 MEMBERS OF THE
COMMUNITY)
CITY OF RYDE
(PER 1,000 MEMBERS OF THE
COMMUNITY)
Total outdoor sports areas 1.6 Ha 0.64 Ha
As playing fields 1.2 Ha 0.62Ha
Area for children‟s play 0.8 Ha 0.51 Ha
8.2 NATURAL AREAS
There are a number of natural areas in the vicinity of the NRSPP. These natural areas vary in size and accessibility and include walking trails, reserves and National Parks. Table 26 provides more detail.
TABLE 26 – NATURAL AREAS IN THE VICINITY OF THE NRSPP
SUBURB NAME ADDRESS
Chatswood West Lane Cove National Park Lady Game Dr, near Fullers Bridge
Mowbray Park Avian Cres
Ryde Canon Walk Argyle St
Lane Cove West Blackman Park Lloyd Rees Dr
Lane Cove Stringybark Reserve Murray St
8.3 BLENHEIM PARK
Blenheim Park in North Ryde is approximately 20,000 square metres in area and includes picnic and BBQ facilities with covered seating, a grassed area and a variety of playground equipment in clusters suitable to varying age groups. A native landscaped cycle/walking track links the different uses. A fenced area for walking dogs off-leash is provided separated from the more family-oriented areas. Car parking is provided within the park for 40 vehicles, in addition to a 12-space car park in the street and some additional on-street parking.
8.4 WATERLOO PARK
Waterloo Park in Marsfield was referenced by the City of Ryde as a good example of a reasonably sized, flexible and successful open space. The City of Ryde indicated that the provision of an open space similar to Waterloo Park, particularly in composition would be valuable at the NRSPP.
Waterloo Park hosts a baseball diamond/sports field, a walking track dotted with fitness stations at intervals, younger children‟s playground equipment, older children‟s climbing equipment, picnic and BBQ facilities, and a half sized basketball court. Waterloo Park has parking for approximately 32 cars, with additional parking at the nearby small shopping centre and on street. The area of the park is approximately 24,000 square metres.
70 EXISTING OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
8.5 ELS HALL PARK
The ELS Hall Park in North Ryde contains three sports fields, playground equipment for older and younger children, a walking/cycle track, fitness stations, picnic and BBQ facilities and a newly opened indoor sports complex. The sports complex is a multi-purpose facility containing two indoor courts for basketball, netball, soccer, badminton and volleyball.
ELS Hall Park is approximately 80,000 m2 with car parking for approximately 125 vehicles. ELS Hall Park
is connected via a walking track along a creek corridor to Santa Rosa Park.
8.6 SANTA ROSA PARK
Santa Rosa Park provides an example of connectivity between open spaces, with a walking/cycle track from ELS Hall Park. A native landscaped walking track follows the creek line through the Park to a soccer field and children‟s playground beyond. An additional walking/cycling track is located along the edge of the reserve.
8.7 RYDE PARK
Despite being too large to reasonably be replicated in the NRSPP (60,000m2), Ryde Park provides a
good example of an integrated multi use park. It houses a cricket oval and a football field on the eastern side, with walking/cycle tracks linking these to a grassed area with picnic tables and BBQs, a bocci pitch, children‟s playground and café towards the western side. The café is located next to the playground and has outdoor seating.
8.8 MEADOWBANK PARK AND MEMORIAL PARK
Meadowbank and Memorial Parks are located adjacent to one another. Meadowbank Park accommodates a complex of sporting/soccer fields and adjoins a tennis complex. Memorial Park, on the banks of the Parramatta River and linked to Meadowbank Park by cycle and walking tracks, has playground equipment and BBQs.
8.9 RECREATION FACILITIES
Eighteen other sports hubs, swimming pools, gymnasiums and tennis courts have been identified in the Ryde LGA including:
The Ryde Aquatic Leisure Centre which includes facilities for water and swimming activities, water polo, netball, soccer, basketball, badminton, indoor soccer and hockey.
North Ryde RSL Community Club Ltd which hosts on site cricket, baseball, tennis, a gymnasium and indoor soccer.
Macquarie University Sport and Aquatic Centre and the university sports fields which are open to the public and hire out fields for clubs. University facilities include a 50m and 25m pool, gymnasium, squash courts, badminton courts and basketball court in addition to sports fields which provide valuable local active recreation facilities.
Gladesville Indoor Sports Centre which includes indoor cricket facilities, practice nets, netball and indoor soccer courts.
Macquarie Ice Rink, located in the Macquarie Centre.
North Ryde Golf Club on Twin Road.
In addition, there are a number of privately operated gyms and tennis courts in the Ryde LGA including four in North Ryde. There are a range of regional, district and local facilities outside the LGA, but nearby. These include:
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 EXISTING OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES 71
Sydney Olympic Park which houses a wide range of active and passive recreational opportunities.
Olympic Park, which is less than 5km from Ryde and approximately 8km from the proposed site.
Lane Cove Aquatic Centre, less than 5km from the site, which includes a 25 m indoor pool, a 50 metre outdoor pool, a leisure pool, warm water pool, sauna, steam room, spa, fitness and weights area, café and a crèche.
Rotary Memorial Athletics Field, located at the western end of Mowbray Rd in Lane Cove North approximately 2km from the site, accommodates a district size athletics field with nearby BBQ and picnic facilities, a boardwalk and walking track along the Lane Cove River linking to other bushland areas, and a canoe launching jetty.
University of Technology Sydney (UTS) Ku-ring-gai Sports Centre at the UTS Lindfield campus, approximately 4km by road from the North Ryde Station Precinct site, has a gymnasium, badminton, squash, tennis facilities and an oval. Membership is open to the general public. There is train access from North Ryde to the UTS site.
National Parks and walking tracks include the Lane Cove National Park, Canon Walk, Blackman Park, Stringybark Reserve, Mowbray Park and the Field of Mars.
TABLE 27 – OTHER EXISTING OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES
TYPE OF FACILITY
NAME ADDRESS
Regional Sydney Olympic Park Off Homebush Bay Drive,
Rotary Field Mowbray Rd West, Lane Cove North
Swimming pools,
gymnasiums,
sports facilities etc.
Ryde Aquatic Leisure Centre 504 Victoria Road, Ryde
North Ryde RSL Youth Club Cnr Pittwater & Magdala Rds, North Ryde
NSW 2113
North Ryde RSL Community Club Ltd Cnr Pittwater & Magdala Rds, North Ryde
NSW 2114
North Ryde Golf Club Ltd Twin Rd, North Ryde NSW 2113
Upper Limits Gym Stamford Grand Hotel, Cnr Epping & Herring
Rds, North Ryde NSW 2113
Active Health Club Lower Level, The Conference Centre, 7
Talavera Rd, North Ryde NSW 2113
Tennis World 16-18 Epping Rd, North Ryde NSW 2113
Ryde East Public School courts and facilities 12 Twin Rd, North Ryde NSW 2113
Ryde Parramatta Golf Club Ltd 1156 Victoria Rd, West Ryde NSW 2114
Geoff Pollard Tennis Centre. Macquarie
University Tennis Courts
Cnr Talavera & Culloden Rds, Marsfield NSW
Macquarie University Sport and Aquatic
Centre
No 2 Gate, Gymnasium Rd (enter off
Culloden Rd), Marsfield NSW 2122
72 EXISTING OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
TYPE OF FACILITY
NAME ADDRESS
M.A.A.S.H. Sports & Fitness Trafalgar Place, Marsfield NSW 2122
Abuklea Road Tennis Courts 87 Abuklea Rd, Marsfield NSW 2122
Moore Tennis - Tennis School Community Tennis Courts, Kings Park, Salter
Cres, Denistone East NSW 2112
AJH Tennis & Sports Centre 54 Agincourt Rd, Marsfield NSW 2122
Gladesville Indoor Sports 39A Frederick St, Ryde NSW 2112
UTS Kuring-gai Sports Centre Eton Rd, Lindfield NSW 2070
Next Generation Ryde 504a Victoria Rd, Ryde NSW 2112
North Shore Squash Centre Lane Cove 29 Birdwood Av, Lane Cove NSW 2066
Ryde Eastwood Leagues Club - The Fitness
Edge
117 Ryedale Rd, West Ryde NSW 2114
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT 73
9 Open Space Assessment
9.1 OVERVIEW
Urbis conducted an open space and recreation analysis in respect of the NRSPP to inform the proposed rezoning and DCP. The analysis assessed existing supply and demand for open space and recreation facilities in the local area based on document review, an audit of existing facilities, population analysis and stakeholder consultation. The following tasks were undertaken in completing this Open Space and Recreation analysis:
Review of relevant local and state government documents relating to provision of open space and sporting facilities standards and benchmarks
High level assessment of demographics and population projections to gauge impact on existing facilities and the need for new facilities
Audit of existing open space and sporting facilities
Investigation of the usage trends and capacity of these facilities based on discussions with the City of Ryde Council and a limited number of informal telephone interviews with providers
Assessment of the likely future demand for open space and sporting facilities, drawing on available benchmarks, population estimates, stakeholder views, participation trends, best practice and City of Ryde policies.
The following is noted about this assessment:
The majority of data, services and facilities reviewed are located within the Ryde LGA. This served a practical purpose of providing a distinct boundary for the audit. The LGA is fairly large and much of the external population anticipated to use the NRSPP will come from this 41km
2 catchment.
It is understood that a new Integrated Open Space Plan will shortly supersede the existing Parks and Track for People 2025 document. While some elements of the Integrated Open Space Plan were provided to Urbis in the preparation of this study, not all were made available or were incomplete at the time of writing. The Integrated Open Space Plan has therefore not been considered in full as part of the assessment.
9.1.1 CONSULTATION
Telephone consultations were conducted with representatives from six sporting and recreational facilities including:
the North Ryde RSL Community Club
the Macquarie University Sport and Aquatic Centre
Ryde Aquatic Leisure Centre
North Ryde Golf Club Ltd
Upper Limits Gym
AHJ Tennis and Sports Centre.
There were a range of views expressed about the capacity of current facilities. Key findings include:
The North Ryde RSL Community Club indicated that their facilities are operating at capacity, and as they field a number of sporting teams using Council facilities, they indicated that these were also operating beyond capacity. The RSL would ideally like to be able to expand their facilities, and suggested the provision of additional indoor soccer training facilities would relieve some pressure
74 OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
from outdoor fields. The new ELS sports complex was suggested as going some way to addressing this.
Macquarie University Sport and Aquatic Centre indicated that there is additional capacity at all their facilities‟ including their sports fields.
There is some capacity within privately operated tennis facilities and gyms.
North Ryde Aquatic Centre reported capacity, particularly over winter months.
The North Ryde Golf Club is at capacity for men‟s and women‟s competitions however they have some capacity for social games.
In addition, consultation was undertaken with City of Ryde Council who raised the following key issues in relation to open space and recreation in the LGA:
Parks and active spaces in the Ryde area and North Ryde (e.g. Blenheim Park) are heavily used, some beyond capacity.
There is a lack of space to the South of Epping Road. This information is confirmed by Clouston Associates
11 mapping of accessibility and connectivity of open space which shows impediments to
access to open space for residents in some areas of North Ryde due to the presence of major roads such as Epping Road and Lane Cove Road.
There is a lack of facilities for youth in the area.
Council‟s priority for the site is for additional active open spaces, particularly in higher density residential development.
A multi-purpose area is desirable, to cater for a range of uses. Flexibility is required to meeting changing needs of the community over time.
Walkability is key priority. The open space needs to cater for the needs of the high proportion of residents from Asian countries and provide opportunities for walking and activities such as Tai Chi and table tennis. This could be done with a multi-purpose area. The increasing number of workers in the area also needs to be provided for.
There is a trend towards „parent sport‟, in particular soccer. There is a need for open space to provide children a place to play while parents‟ play sport. Sites need to cater for multiple age groups e.g. fenced play equipment, open park/ovals, nets for cricket/hoops, exercise equipment.
Environmental considerations are important, particularly in the area of the site. There is significant community interest in this. Magdala Park is of importance to the community.
The co-location of sporting facilities with community facilities is generally supported. The new sports/recreation complex at ELS Hall Park was cited as a good example.
A district park is suggested as a minimum. This requires good connectivity via walking and cycle ways to other bushland or open space (green fingers).
Waterloo Park, which includes a sports field, walking circuit, playgrounds and basketball court was cited as a possible model for an open area on site. Ryde Park was thought to be a good example of a multi-purpose open space area, but it is recognized it is too big for the North Ryde Station Precinct.
Smaller pocket parks are generally not favoured by Council, due to difficulties in making them useful for community uses and ongoing maintenance costs. Larger, better quality facilities are favoured.
11 Clouston Associates, 2011, Accessibility and Connective of Open Space
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT 75
It was thought that there is not a need for additional swimming pools, and facilities such as gyms and tennis courts are likely to be provided on a commercial basis by private operators.
9.1.2 BENCHMARKS
There are a number of open space and recreation facility standards that can be applied to establish the open space and recreational facilities required to service the population of the NRSPP and surrounding catchment. The following section outlines some of these benchmarks, including guidelines for new release areas (GCC) and Ryde City Council‟s Section 94 Development Contributions Plan.
It is important to note that while benchmarks provide a guide to the provision requires, there are many contextual factors also influencing the amount of open space and recreation facilities that may be required. For instance, the application of benchmarks must also consider what facilities and services are currently available, how these facilities are used and whether there are vacancies or capacity in these services. The characteristics of the incoming population, including how the population is expected to evolve, are also an important consideration.
It is also noted that some benchmarks, despite being used as a guide by a variety of consent authorities, are many years old and subsequently may no longer be realistic for modern developments and densities. Subsequently, benchmarks have not been the determining factor for the provision of open space and recreation facilities within the NRSPP.
9.1.2.1 OPEN SPACE STANDARDS
Table 28 outlines available open space standards that may be used to assess the provision of open space in the City of Ryde and more specifically, at the NRSPP.
TABLE 28 – STANDARDS FOR OPEN SPACE
TYPE OF OPEN SPACE STANDARD SOURCE LAND
REQUIREMENT
General 2.83 hectares per 1,000 head of
population benchmark
City of Ryde Section 94
Contributions Plan12
-
GCC standard13
Local Park 1 local park per 4,000 people Local Government and Shires
Association14
0.4 – 1.5 hectare
District Park 1 district park per 10,000 Local Government and Shires
Association15
2 – 5 hectares
1 district park per 100,000
people
GCC standard16
Of particular note, is the standard of 2.38 hectares of open space per 1,000 people, which is identified in both the City of Ryde‟s Section 94 Contributions Plan
17 and the Growth Centres Commission
12 City of Ryde, 2007, Section 94 Contributions Plan.
13 Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
14 LGSA, 1999, Open space and sports facility standards
15 LGSA, 1999, Open space and sports facility standards
16 Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
17 City of Ryde, 2007, Sections 94 Contributions Plan
76 OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
Development Code18
. While this standard is commonly referred to in open space planning, the NSW Department of Planning‟s Recreation and Open Space Guidelines
19 acknowledges that the standard may
be unrealistic in more densely populated areas of the Sydney Metropolitan region. This is likely to be the case for the Ryde LGA, particularly for the higher density proposals associated with the North Ryde Station Precinct.
9.1.2.2 RECREATION FACILITY STANDARDS
The following provides an overview of some available benchmarks for the provision of recreational facilities.
TABLE 29 – STANDARDS FOR RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
TYPE OF FACILITY STANDARD / INDICATIVE
POPULATION
THRESHOLD
SOURCE INDICATIVE LAND
SIZE
Sports field – local 1 per 10,000 people GCC standard20
Small: 100 x 70 metres
Large: 120 x 80 metres
Sports field – district 1 per 30,000 people GCC standard21
5 – 8 hectares
Cricket oval 2,500 people Department of Planning
200922
2 hectares
Soccer field 3,000 people Department of Planning
200923
1 hectare
Netball courts 1 per 1,000 – 2,000 people City of Ryde Section 94
Contributions Plan24
1 – 2 hectares
3,000 people Department of Planning
200925
1 per 10,000 people GCC standard26
Basketball courts 1,800 people Department of Planning
200927
1 – 2 hectares
Tennis centre / courts –
local
1 per 1,000 – 1,500 people City of Ryde Section 94
Contributions Plan28
1 hectare
18 Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
19 NSW Department of Planning, 2010, Recreation and Open Space Guidelines for Local Government.
20 Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
21 Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
22 NSW Department of Planning, 2009, Draft local development contributions guidelines
23 NSW Department of Planning, 2009, Draft local development contributions guidelines
24 City of Ryde, 2007, Section 94 Contributions Plan.
25 NSW Department of Planning, 2009, Draft local development contributions guidelines
26 Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
27 NSW Department of Planning, 2009, Draft local development contributions guidelines
28 City of Ryde, 2007, Section 94 Contributions Plan.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT 77
TYPE OF FACILITY STANDARD / INDICATIVE
POPULATION
THRESHOLD
SOURCE INDICATIVE LAND
SIZE
1 per 10,000 people GCC standard29
Tennis centre – district 1 per 30,000 people GCC standard30
2 hectares (8 – 12
courts)
Swimming pool or
aquatic centre – district
1 per 20,000 – 50,000 City of Ryde Section 94
Contributions Plan31
1 hectare
1 per 100,000 people GCC standard32
Gymnasiums Research suggests that gyms
become profitable with 500 plus
members.
Urbis Property Economics The most successful
gyms are those with an
area of at least
1,000m² and
membership of 1,500 -
2,000 members. This
equates to between
0.5m² and 0.67m² of
gym floor space per
member.
9.2 OPEN SPACE IN THE NRSPP
The key principles which have informed open space planning for the NRSPP are:
Diversity: The full spectrum of open space should be represented in the NRSPP, including passive open space, active open space and bushland with ecological value.
Connectivity: There must be strong connectivity and walkability between the main park in the precinct and other open space, both within the NRSPP and to areas beyond.
Mixed-use: Open space must by flexible and able to accommodate a variety of uses. The diverse needs of different age groups and cultures must also be catered to.
Critical mass: There should be at least one major allocation of open space that allows for a range of activities in one place (walking, running, play equipment, picnicking, ball sports, exercise, etc.).
Attractive: Open space on site (in particular the main park) should attract the broader community to the Precinct.
Three distinct options for the provision and distribution of open space across the precinct were considered, being:
Option 1: Linear Park – a green corridor running the length of the Precinct.
29 Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
30 Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
31 City of Ryde, 2007, Section 94 Contributions Plan.
32 Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
78 OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
Option 2: Central Park – a large central open space in each site within the Precinct.
Option 3: Stepped Spaces – smaller and more widely distributed open spaces to spread open space evenly throughout the Precinct.
Upon evaluation, Option 3 (Stepped Spaces), (see Figure 19) was chosen as the most appropriate design for the NRSPP as it:
Optimises the attributes of all development sites.
Spreads the open space through the sites.
Creates distinct neighbourhoods around a number of „green hearts‟
Can be staged to deliver „complete‟ stages
Provides café spaces on parks oriented to the afternoon sun.
Includes a community centre used to define west edge of M2 Site.
Provides north-south development with have good solar access.
Achieves the lowest area of site road coverage and highest area of development plots.
Maximises open space frontage and north facing facades.
Includes potential for informal sporting use of open space.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT 79
FIGURE 19 – STEPPED SPACES OPTION
80 OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
The „Stepped Spaces‟ option produced the following key areas of open space – summarised in Table 30 below and shown in Figure 20.
TABLE 30 – OPEN SPACE PROVISION IN THE NRSPP
OPEN SPACE ELEMENT SIZE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS SPACE UNDER THE DCP
M2 Site - Central Open Space
(proposed to be zoned Public Open
Space RE1)
6,290m² Includes 2,000m² lawn for informal ball games and active play
Children‟s playground with equipment for children 2-8 years
Park will interface with the retail and commercial buildings to
the south
Includes BBQ and picnic facilities
Outdoor gym circuit
Bike parking provided on urban edge
Adjacent road to the south to be a raised surface to create a
shared zone and increase permeability between the retail and
park edge.
Public art, comprising a totemic element marking the main
open space.
Provides the pedestrian bridge landing area
M2 Site - Northern Bushland Park
(proposed to be zoned Public Open
Space RE1)
4,040m² A natural landscape of restored bushland
Environmental playground for children 2-8 years
Pedestrian connection to Wicks Road to be located on the
eastern side of the park and bridged over Porters Creek.
Public art comprising a naturalistic piece relating to the creek
and trees.
M2 Site - Community Park
(Permissible under the proposed
High Density Residential Zone R4. A
park of this size, open to the public,
in this general location is a
requirement under the DCP)
1,895m² Designed as a passive recreation place including a retail
dining area
Detention capability
Footpath to be located between the adjacent building and the
park to connect the M2 edge road to the Spine Road.
Public art comprising a small, informal element.
M2 Site - Community Centre
(Permissible under the proposed
Public Open Space zone RE1 zone.
The provision of the community
centre in this general location is a
requirement of the DCP)
2,500m²
(Total site)
1,665 m² of
this is
Community
Centre
open
Multi-purpose community centre site
Building to open onto landscaped open space
Open space to include half basketball court
Playground for small children 0-6 years
Includes bike parking and community car park.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT 81
OPEN SPACE ELEMENT SIZE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS SPACE UNDER THE DCP
space
OSL Site – Open Space
(proposed to be zoned Public Open
Space RE1)
2,175m² Open space along southern boundary to provide an addition to
Blenheim Park
Includes footpath connection from Blenheim Park to Epping
Road.
Includes provision for café.
Public art comprising an informal piece relating to the Blue
Gum High Forest.
The overall provision and distribution of open space within the NRSPP was also influenced by a number of key factors:
The identity of the proposal as a TOD requiring the achievement of a certain density to make it feasible and successful in activating surrounding transport infrastructure.
The access constraints of the site (particularly the M2 site) making it unsuitable for larger regional or district open space provision.
The proximity of the site to large areas of regional and local open space such as the Lane Cove National Park, Blenheim Park and Bundarra Reserve and the ability of the future community to access this space.
The constraints of the site in relation to the presence of rail infrastructure and the Epping-Chatswood Rail Corridor bisecting the site.
In summary open space provision across the NRSPP is proposed as follows
Of the 21,000m2 of land proposed to be zoned Public Recreation RE1, the DCP controls requires the
provision of 16,065m2 of open space areas as follows:
- M2 Site - Central Open Space (6,290 m2)
- M2 Site - Northern Bushland Park (4,040m²)
- OSL Site – Open Space (2,175m²)
- Open space area associated with the community centre (approximately 1,665m2)
The remainder of the land zoned RE1 is required for the necessary road connections through the site and land
required for the community centre.
In addition, the DCP requires a community park be provided in the High Density Residential Zone (M2 site) providing a further 1,895m² of land for open space. The DCP also requires the provision of other public domain areas such as urban plazas around the potential retail land uses and the station entrance.
82 OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
FIGURE 20 – OPEN SPACE TYPOLOGIES
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT 83
9.3 OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT
The following table provides an assessment of the adequacy of the open spaces proposed to be provided within the North Ryde Station Precinct.
OPEN SPACE /
RECREATION ELEMENT
EVALUATION
Open Space Provision within
the NRSPP
Based upon the open space benchmarks cited previously in this report, the
anticipated population growth associated with the NRSPP justifies the provision of
regional scale open space. However, it is acknowledged that the provision of such
open space is unfeasible given site constraints such as access, parking and the
higher density required of a TOD. It is noted that the standard of 2.38 hectares of
open space per 1,000 people, identified in both the City of Ryde‟s Section 94
Contributions Plan33
and the Growth Centres Commission Development Code34
is
acknowledged to be unrealistic in more densely populated areas of the Sydney
Metropolitan region as proposed under the NRSPP.
A district scale park, demonstrating best practice principles such as colocation of a
variety of multi-purpose facilities and spaces catering to diverse community needs
is considered more reasonable and achievable within the NRSPP.
Good connectivity and mixed-use capabilities are particularly important in the
context of the NRSPP which has the potential for the establishment of good links to
regional open space such as Lane Cove National Park. The opportunity to provide
pedestrian links from the site to the National Park has been given consideration
and whilst beyond the scope of the NRSPP to provide, it is recommended that
future opportunities to establish these connections be investigated.
The main open space area on the NRSPP is approximately 6,290m² and is
centrally located on the M2 Site in proximity to the proposed multi-purpose
community centre. The park provides a lawn area of 2,000m² to facilitate active
play, along with a playground and passive recreation spaces.
The provision of formal sporting fields was considered during the design process
for the NRSPP, however the access and parking constraints of the M2 Site
precluding an efficient and functional design for the incorporation of such facilities.
Half-court basketball courts are planned for the site, to be provided on the site of
the community centre, along with potential indoor sports facilities within the centre
itself.
Fitness stations are also proposed in the main open space area to provide
residents with opportunities for active recreation and exercise.
Improved pedestrian and cycleways will also be provided throughout the precinct to
better connect existing and future residents with surrounding facilities.
Overall, in comparison to other high density and TODs, the NRSPP provides a
higher than average rate of open space per resident and has one of the highest
33 City of Ryde, 2007, Sections 94 Contributions Plan
34 Growth Centres Commission, 2006, Development Code: Precinct Development Parameters.
84 OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
OPEN SPACE /
RECREATION ELEMENT
EVALUATION
proportions of open space across the development of the seven developments
considered.
It is also noted that, unlike many developments, the NRSPP proposes the delivery
of open spaces up front at Stage 1 of the development, making these spaces
available to the existing and future community up front.
Playgrounds Regarding children‟s playgrounds, the City of Ryde adopts a high standard of 0.5
hectares of play area per 1,000 people. Applying this standard to the NRSPP,
approximately 2.5 hectares of play areas would be required in addition to other
open space areas. This standard is considered excessive for densely populated
areas and, despite the application of this benchmark in Ryde in the past, it is not
anticipated that this scale of provision will be necessary. Council has
acknowledged no shortage of play grounds in the LGA.
Recent good practice in relation to the provision of playgrounds suggests they can
utilise small areas and as long as there is a variety of equipment provided, they do
not need to use of large tracts of land.
Four children‟s playgrounds are proposed within the NRSPP, located within the
main open space area on the M2 Site, co-located with the community facility, within
the community park on the M2 Site and within the northern bushland park on the
M2 Site.
Active Recreation Facilities The assessment has determined that formal recreation facilities, in particular tennis
courts, gymnasiums and swimming pools, are adequately provided for within the
LGA. Based on consultation with some providers, it has been determined that there
is also sufficient capacity within formal recreation facilities to accommodate
additional patronage.
Consultation with Council and a desktop review of existing facilities indicate that
regional scale facilities (such as tennis courts, swimming pools and gymnasiums)
currently service the area well and there is not a pressing need for additional
facilities to be provided. Subsequently it is concluded that there is no need to
incorporate regional scale facilities into the NRSPP. At present, many regional
scale facilities are provided by the commercial sector (pools, tennis courts etc.) and
it considered that similar arrangements will suffice for the NRSPP should the
demand for additional regional facilities arise at a later stage.
Bearing in mind the known shortfall in active recreation opportunities in the local
area, the NRSPP has planned for the inclusion of some local scale active
opportunities such as half-court basketball courts, exercise stations and potential
indoor courts within the community centre.
Impacts upon Blenheim Park Blenheim Park is located directly south of the OSL Site.
A visit to Blenheim Park on a weekday morning undertaken as part of the open
space needs assessment found that all areas of the park were in use. During
consultation Council also noted through consultation that Blenheim Park was a
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT 85
OPEN SPACE /
RECREATION ELEMENT
EVALUATION
well-used and popular open space within the LGA.
In order to minimise the potential impacts of increased demand on this space, the
proposal aims to provide an integration of open space, community facilities, parking
and connectivity between the OSL Site and Blenheim Park. The proposal provides
an additional 2,175 square metres of public open space that connects directly to
the north-western edge of Blenheim Park and has been incorporated into the
planning framework as an extension to the Park to be dedicated to Council. In
addition a free standing café is proposed to be included in this additional open
space to improve retail amenity for the existing and future users of the park. It is
envisaged that the open space area (and possibly the café) adjoining Blenheim
Park would be subdivided into a separate superlot which would be vested to
Council at a later stage for the benefit of existing and future residents of the area.
It is also noted that Blenheim Park is principally used by families with young
children, with play equipment generally designed for children under 12. The
proposed NRSPP is expected to attract a future population which is dominated by
professional couples without children therefore the likely usage patterns of the
future community of the NRSPP will be different to those currently utilising
Blenheim Park. Further as the development of the NRSPP will occur in a staged
manner, over a 15 year period, any increased demand on Blenheim Park would be
experienced incrementally and gradually over time providing ample opportunity for
the staged management of potential impacts.
Couples with no children and a working population will be more likely to access
Blenheim Park during afternoons and evenings as well as on weekends, rather
than during weekdays when families with children under 5 would generally visit. It
is acknowledged that there is likely to be some additional demand for the park
during weekends, however, the bulk of the future population of the NRSPP will
reside on the M2 site where more conveniently located open space areas east of
Epping Road will service some of this increased demand. It will be important to
ensure the appropriate management and maintenance of the park continues,
particularly during high usage periods.
It is understood that the existing trees along the western edge of the OSL Site will
also be maintained, as will the green link through the site between Epping Road
and Blenheim Park.
The proposed built form on the OSL Site is of a scale which preserves the context
and setting of Blenheim Park and nearby residences and significant trees along the
western boundary of the OSL Site are also retained under the proposal to form a
natural buffer. The proposed development outcome aims to maintain the amenity of
the existing residential dwellings and minimises overshadowing impacts on
Blenheim Park.
86 OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
9.4 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The City of Ryde has identified shortfalls in active open space provision, both during consultation and in Council planning documents. For instance, Council‟s Parks on Track for People 2025 document recognises a need for Council to provide more opportunities for women and youth to be engaged in active recreation. The North Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils
35 (NSROC) has also identified similar
shortfalls, particularly around the availability of sportsgrounds in the NSROC region (which includes the City of Ryde). Sportsgrounds in the area are in poor condition, are overused and are unable to accommodate expressed demand or projected future demand.
Key principles adopted for open space planning at the NRSPP include:
Recognising the diverse and changing nature of the population of the Ryde LGA and catering for a variety of needs in terms of active and passive recreation opportunities.
Flexible and appropriate open space and recreation provision to accommodate a broad cross section of the community, including the use of multi-purpose spaces which are more efficient in delivering a range of services, particularly on constrained sites.
Improving connectivity between open spaces and recreation facilities, including public transport, walking tracks and bike paths. Connectivity is a key priority for the NRSPP generally and has permeated the philosophy of open space provision.
Maximise opportunities for social interaction and engagement throughout the day and the night through the co-location of community facilities and open space.
Active recreation opportunities provided alongside traditional passive recreation facilities.
The provision of open space and recreation facilities within the NRSPP must be considered in the context of the development as a TOD and the higher densities associated with this form of development. Inherent site constraints, such as accessibility and parking also limit the suitability of the site for regional scale open space which might attract patronage from the broader community. The NRSPP provides open space and recreation facilities to primarily serve the future community of the precinct, but also embellishes existing open spaces such as Blenheim Park through the addition of some 2,175m² of additional land to the park along with provision for retail opportunities to enhance the amenity for users of the park.
Importantly, the NRSPP is located in proximity to high quality regional open space through the Lane Cove National Park. Improved linkages to the park would benefit the future community of the development greatly and, whilst beyond the immediate scope of the NRSPP, all opportunities for the establishment of these linkages should be explored. The additional demand placed on open space facilities provided elsewhere in the Ryde will be addressed through the requirement to pay Section 94 Contributions and will be assessed at future DA stage.
35 North Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils, 2011, Draft NSROC Regional Sportsground Management Strategy
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 87
10 Social Impact Assessment
10.1 POTENTIAL SOCIAL ISSUES AND IMPACTS
This section provides an assessment of other potential social impacts of the proposed NRSPP. It details likely positive and negative impacts in the immediate vicinity and the local community based on the background research undertaken (document review, current and future Census-based demographic profiling, audit of existing and proposed social infrastructure and open space) and the outcomes of the stakeholder and community consultation activities undertaken to date.
The proposed NRSPP will result in substantial change to the site as it currently exists. There will be inevitable impacts on the local and regional community immediately and into the future as the development progresses. The planning controls proposed for the precinct aim to ensure that a high quality development results which meets the needs and respects the current and future populations.
The local, regional and global strategic significance of the NRSPP is considerable. The project will support the envisaged growth of Ryde and the MPC as Major Centres and strengthen the role of Macquarie Park in Sydney‟s „global arc‟. The proposed development will be an iconic landmark in the region and will activate and compliment regional land uses and assets including the North Ryde Railway Station, the Macquarie Business Park, Macquarie University and major education and health services.
The NRSPP integrates with surrounding residential and business land uses and provides opportunities for people to live, work and study in the area. Further, it will provide greater activation of the North Ryde Railway Station and increased patronage for the train station to capitalise on the State Government‟s investment in this important transport infrastructure. The NRSPP will allow people to live close to employment and education infrastructure as well as provide access to a number of different transport options.
The following sections seek to provide an understanding of the social impacts of the proposal, including:
the potential impacts of the proposed land use and built form;
connectivity and accessibility;
sustainability;
impacts upon surrounding features such as Lane Cove National Park and the Macquarie Park Cemetery and Crematorium;
housing affordability; and
safety and security.
Note that these potential impacts should be considered in addition to the assessment of social impacts considered at Section 7 for social infrastructure and Section 9 for open space and recreation facilities.
10.2 LAND USE
The NRSPP proposes a mix of new land uses across the Precinct including residential, commercial, retail and community uses. The mix of land uses proposed is not incompatible with the existing surrounding land use character and has been designed to create a new community with a distinct identity. It is recognised that the proposed land uses are located to reflect opportunities created by access to local transport hubs, including North Ryde Railway Station and express bus stops on Waterloo and Epping Road. The two key principles that underpin the land use arrangement are:
employment uses within 500 metres of the station; and
residential within 800 metres of the station.
88 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
In this way, the NRSPP maximizes opportunities for residents to access public transport and improve the overall sustainability of the development in line with TOD principles. The proposed land use mix is not expected to result in adverse social impact or land use conflict.
10.3 BUILT FORM
Whilst the built form proposed is different in scale to that of established surrounding areas, it is recognised that the NRSPP will be a distinct neighbourhood with its own character which will evolve over the life of the development. The built form therefore responds to the desired future character of the precinct and is expected to integrate well with the type of development set to emerge in Macquarie Park over the next decade.
Due to the proposed densities of the NRSPP the design response is especially important to creating a high quality environment, particularly at street level. Consideration has been given in the development of built form controls to creating a human scale and activating ground planes including front gardens and front doors onto the street at ground level. The proposed built form controls have been developed to minimize negative impacts upon surrounding development in terms of visual impact and solar access, optimise roads and open space and to provide high quality sites for future development.
The proposed built form and building heights have been designed to respond to a number of principles, including:
Defining streets with low scale buildings.
Locating towers on the edges of sites away from existing residential areas.
Locating towers off axis to minimise visual impact.
Provision of increased heights to the road away from Epping Road.
Lower development to the north side of perimeter blocks for solar access to courtyards.
Avoiding long uninterrupted facades.
Avoiding towers on axes.
High rise blocks orientated to maximise city and green views.
The „high rise‟ buildings have been strategically positioned on the M2, Station North and Station South Sites, along major arterial roads, away from low scale residential development and adjacent to commercial development. These buildings justify and reflect the TOD principles of high density located within close proximity to transport hubs. In addition the higher towers are located to minimise the potential for overshadowing, preserve amenity for open space areas, and maintain identified view corridors within and between sites. It is noted that the proposed design attempts to minimise the impact of the project on surrounding development, particularly the low rise residential development to the south of the OSL Site. Buildings located adjacent to residential development and open space are „stepped back‟ allowing for reduced physical impact. For example low rise buildings located on the OSL Site (four storeys) are located along the passive open space buffer on the western edge of the site. Building heights of up to six storeys on the OSL Site are located along Epping Road, away from current residential dwellings to the south of the site.
The proposed planning framework aims to minimise the impact of overshadowing on current land uses adjacent to the NRSPP site including existing and proposed open spaces. The following highlights key findings from the solar access studies and the overshadowing assessment:
Indicative building envelopes achieve no overshadowing of adjacent residential properties after 10:30am on the shortest day of the year (21 June). This is above the standard requirement of the Ryde DCP 2010 for two hours minimum sunlight between 9:00am and 3:00pm.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 89
Approximately 14 residential properties will experience overshadowing at some point from 9am until 10:30am.
The location and design of buildings also maximises the lunch time sun on the new open spaces within the NRSPP.
It is noted, that overshadowing may have some impact on the proposed open space, predominately during winter months. However, the DCP prepared for the NRSPP will require future development applications to demonstrate that the proposed open space and landscaping is well designed to ensure acceptable levels of solar access are achieved and the amenity of these spaces is preserved.
10.4 PUBLIC ART
The DCP includes requirements for public art across the NRSPP site. The provisions aim to encourage a narrative consistent with the history, built and natural forms and location of the artworks. The inclusion of public art work within the community will provide an extension of place and ownership for residents. It will be important to include current and potential future community members in the design of the public artwork to reflect the cultural diversity of the likely future residents.
10.5 CONNECTIVITY AND ACCESSIBILITY
The North Ryde Station Precinct comprises five separate parcels of land, currently fragmented and isolated from each other and local services and facilities as a result of major arterial roads. A key outcome of the NRSPP will be improved connections between these sites and importantly, improved connections for future residents to public transport, employment, retail services and open space.
The ultimate redevelopment of the precinct as envisaged by the rezoning proposal and DCP emphasises public transport, pedestrian and cycle access. The proposed cycle ways and pedestrian path ways will connect the NRSPP site with the wider North Ryde suburb as well as key transport infrastructure, including the North Ryde Train Station. These connections will encourage new residents to access existing and new built and natural infrastructure by foot and bike. This will influence transport choices and reduce the reliance of future residents on private vehicles.
It is noted however that there will be a need to manage on site vehicular movement due to the location of the site within close proximity to major arterial roads and existing traffic conditions on the surrounding road network. The area currently experiences a constrained traffic environment. Extensive traffic studies were undertaken in the preliminary and assessment phases of the project to identify and quantify the potential traffic and access constraints of the precinct (Parsons Brinckerhoff, August 2012). As a result of these studies and in response to the nature of the project as a TOD, a reduced rate of car parking has been proposed across the site to further drive a mode shift towards public and active transport. In addition, road upgrades and improvements will also be implemented to support the proposed development.
The DCP for the precinct proposes a spine road through the M2 Site from Waterloo Road to Epping Road for primary vehicular circulation through the site. Appropriate pedestrian and cycle safety measures will be implemented along this road to maximise safe movements and interfaces. Local roads and one way streets located within the Precinct have been designed to discourage high vehicle speeds and allow for cycles to share carriageway.
The NRSPP reflects the key principles of a TOD by encouraging and providing pedestrian and cycleway access and mobility throughout the site and adjoining land uses. Connection between the different parcels of land is evident with pedestrian walk ways, footpaths and a universally accessible pedestrian and cycle bridge. The pedestrian bridge will be an integral part of bringing the NRSPP together and it will be important that the design and function of the bridge is iconic, promotes a sense of ownership and is easily accessible for all population groups.
Overall there is a strong sense of permeability in the DCP structure plan, encouraging internal and external accessibility for future residents to the North Ryde Railway Station, open space, community facilities and proposed commercial premises.
90 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
With regard to regional connectivity, the DCP reflects the objective of the Macquarie Park Town Centre Strategy for Character Area 3 (Waterloo Road) by ensuring Waterloo Road (the main street of the Corridor) between Macquarie University and the Riverside Corporate Park, supports and links Macquarie University to the Riverside Corporate Park.
10.6 SUSTAINABILITY
The NRSPP adopts a holistic approach to sustainability, embedding sustainable initiatives into the planning framework for the precinct. As part of the development of the project, a project specific sustainability strategy has been prepared which provides targets to be adopted through the design, construction and future operation of the NRSPP.
The sustainability targets include; water minimisation, energy and carbon reduction, waste minimisation and materials selection, ecology, community, car dependency and TOD. These targets will be implemented through a variety of mechanisms including inherent design principles, installation through early infrastructure works, sustainability requirements for planning approvals, the site specific development control plan and potentially through contracts of sale.
These initiatives will be implemented throughout the design, construction and completion phases of the NRSPP to ensure that the project represents best practice or above in sustainable development.
10.7 LANE COVE NATIONAL PARK
The NRSPP benefits from its close proximity to regional open space in the Lane Cove National Park, located just east of the precinct. Despite its close proximity, the existing isolated nature of the North Ryde Station Precinct sites limits the connectivity to this important open space area for future residents. The improved connections between sites, including the proposed pedestrian bridge will greatly improve access to the National Park.
Through the project development phase potential future direct pedestrian links to the LCNP (indicative only) were identified at the northern point of the M2 Site and to the east of the Station North Site. These links could provide greater access to the National Park for local residents of the NRSPP as well as residents of the wider Ryde LGA. These access points may connect to existing pedestrian paths as well as proposed connections throughout the NRSPP creating a potential new walking circuit. It is noted that the delivery of these connections is not in the control of the proponent and therefore outside of the scope of the NRSPP to deliver. However, consideration of the establishment of these links in the future, subject to agreement with landowners would benefit the existing and future community.
Any potential links should consider the following factors:
Providing access to residents from both east and west sides of the cemetery.
Providing access to existing facilities within the park.
Minimising impacts on private lands.
Providing a „whole of government‟ solution by using public lands where possible.
Avoiding steepest gradients to minimise earthworks and required site improvements.
Taking advantage of existing paths and roadways.
Providing potential for a „loop‟ circuit through the park.
10.8 MACQUARIE PARK CEMETERY AND CREMATORIUM
The NRSPP is located adjacent to the Macquarie Park Cemetery and Crematorium (MACCEM), a large, open lawn cemetery. As part of the social impact assessment, consultation was undertaken with the MACCEM to establish any issues or concerns in relation to the proposed development.
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 91
As part of this consultation, use of MACCEM‟s open space areas as pedestrian links to Lane Cove National Park and for passive uses was discussed. Overall, MACCEM support the proposal for activation of the precinct. Further details of this meeting are provided within the Urbis Public Policy Consultation Report 2012. MACCEM has also recently prepared a master plan for the cemetery but this document was not available for review at the time of writing this report.
The DCP for the NRSPP suggests potential pedestrian links along the southern boundary of the cemetery with an existing light crossing (signalised) located between the Station North Site and the cemetery. Proposed access links between the NRSPP site and cemetery site, including the LCNP should be considered in context with the operation hours of the cemetery (7am and 6pm, 7 days a week). It is understood that a link from Wicks Road to the NRSPP site is proposed and supported. Connectivity between these three distinct areas is encouraged as it will provide current and future North Ryde residents and visitors with opportunities of accessing a variety of community based services, transport and bushland.
10.9 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY
The City of Ryde Affordable Housing Strategy36
prepared by Judith Stubbs and Associates investigated the matter of housing affordability in the Ryde LGA in 2008. The Strategy identified that there is some need for additional affordable housing in the Ryde LGA, as is the case across much of Sydney. The report found that there are “constraints for low to moderate-income households in either purchasing or renting affordably in the LGA”. University students, young working singles and couples, families with children and older residents receiving the aged pension are most affected.
While there is always a need for affordable housing, the NRSPP is not considered ideally suited for the provision of public housing. However, a 4% affordable housing component is proposed as part of the NRSPP to be delivered partly through housing stock (2%) and partly through monetary contribution (2%). This is considered to adequately address the need for affordable housing within the precinct and has been agreed with the Department of Housing.
The demand for affordable housing will be further alleviated by the proposal through the increase in housing supply that will result from the NRSPP, as well as the provision of lower-cost housing stock driven through smaller unit sizes and lower car parking rates as proposed.
Judith Stubbs and Associates identify a current oversupply of Independent Living Units (ILUs) in the Ryde LGA, though a shortfall is expected to occur towards 2021. The provision of “an adequate amount of high density development close to services and transport that is adaptable and accessible” was identified as a partial response to this shortfall and the NRSPP responds to this need.
10.10 SAFETY AND SECURITY
The proposed design for the NRSPP considers and addresses the principles of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) which is based upon four key principles:
Territorial reinforcement
Surveillance
Access Control
Activity Management
The public domain elements of the design guiding the future development of the NRSPP have been assessed against these principles in the table below:
36 Judith Stubbs and Associates, 2008, City of Ryde Affordable Housing Strategy.
92 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
TABLE 31 – PUBLIC DOMAIN CPTED CONSIDERATIONS
PUBLIC DOMAIN CPTED CONSIDERATIONS M2 SITE OSL SITE RMS SITE STATION
SITE
TERRITORIAL REINFORCEMENT
Ensure block road widths and building setbacks contribute to
human scale
Yes Yes NA Yes
Use of high quality finishes to encourage pride and sense of
ownership
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Select materials to resist vandalism Yes Yes Yes Yes
Select materials and planting to facilitate ongoing
maintenance
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Limit private activities to private areas Yes Yes Yes Yes
SURVEILLANCE
Design streets to increase pedestrian and bicycle traffic Yes Yes NA Yes
Open spaces to be overlooked by people in adjacent
buildings
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Provide unimpeded sight lines, particularly along pedestrian
pathways
Yes Yes NA Yes
Planting to protect sightlines Yes Yes Yes Yes
Public domain to be lit to Australian standards Yes Yes Yes Yes
Ensure that the faces of the people in open spaces are lit Yes Yes Yes Yes
ACCESS CONTROL
Use clearly identifiable points of entry to open spaces Yes Yes NA Yes
Open spaces to have more than two egress points Yes Yes NA Yes
Limit depth of dead end streets/ensure viability Yes Yes NA Yes
ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT
Create a mix of uses which open at night and after hours
that promote round-the-clock surveillance and are
compatible with neighbouring uses such as residential areas
Yes Yes NA Yes
Locate retail and commercial activities adjacent to open Yes Yes NA Yes
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 93
PUBLIC DOMAIN CPTED CONSIDERATIONS M2 SITE OSL SITE RMS SITE STATION
SITE
space
Manage block length to manage scale and facilitate
walking/cycling
Yes Yes NA Yes
Locate amenities such as seating or refreshments in
common areas to attract desired users.
Yes Yes NA Yes
Community centre to have publicly accessible uses and
activities
Yes NA NA NA
The table above demonstrates the compliance of the NRSPP with the principles of CPTED.
94 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
11 Conclusion and Recommendations
Overall, the NRSPP has been planned and designed to contribute positively to the local and regional community of North Ryde and the broader Ryde LGA. The proposal offers a unique opportunity to achieve a TOD in an under developed Precinct that has access to a new railway station. The project has been informed by TOD principles and seeks to achieve an integrated land and transport oriented hub, with improved connectivity to North Ryde Station and access for future residents to open space and recreational facilities, including the LCNP.
This SIA has demonstrated the potential positive and negative social impacts of the NRSPP and areas for management as part of future development stages. The review of current and future demographic profiles, review of local and state planning policies, the social infrastructure audit and stakeholder consultation carried out to date have demonstrated the likely need and demand for services and facilities within the NRSPP. A range of issues were raised during these studies and consultation and these have been considered and responded to as appropriate within the NRSPP. The following outlines key matters to be considered and implemented where appropriate in relation to the NRSPP:
Ongoing community consultation should be implemented throughout future stages of the development process. The proponent has demonstrated a commitment to meaningful engagement through a wide range of community and stakeholder consultation undertaken to date.
The NRSPP will generate a future population which triggers the need for additional school enrolments. However, the isolated nature of the site makes it unsuitable for a new school location (as agreed with the DEC). Rather, the additional demand for school places should be addressed through the upgrade of existing schools in the area which have the capacity for additional enrolments.
The provision of open space within the NRSPP must be considered in the context of the nature of the project as a TOD, its isolated nature and inability to accommodate significant parking associated with larger areas of open space and the applicability of standard benchmarks to modern, higher density developments.
The implementation of proposed pedestrian and cycle ways within the NRSPP is critical to achieve the full connectivity benefits promised by the NRSPP. The proposed DCP demonstrates high quality pedestrian and cycle links across the site and also establishes regional connections. It will be important to ensure that these connections are clearly defined, easily accessible and appropriately landscaped. This will ensure residents and visitors are able to navigate around the NRSPP, access transport hubs, including the North Ryde Station as well as access regional open space, including Blenheim Park and the LCNP.
Whilst beyond the immediate scope of the NRSPP, it would be of benefit to consider ways of achieving future connections to the LCNP to expand open space and recreation opportunities for existing and future residents through the creation of a potential new walking track.
The provision of additional space to expand Blenheim Park is a positive outcome for the community. In order to counter any additional pressures on this parkland as a result of development and growth in the area, it is important to ensure the appropriate management and maintenance of the park continues, particularly during high usage periods.
The management of potential overshadowing of open space as a result of the NRSPP is critical to preserving the amenity of proposed open space areas, particularly during winter months. Proposed open space embellishment and landscaping must be designed to ensure maximum light to ensure that these spaces are inviting and encourage residents and visitors into the space.
The proposed multi-purpose community facility is considered adequate for the NRSPP site. It will be important that this facility is accessible and inviting for current and future residents. It is recommended that the internal and external uses associated with the facility cater for active recreation activities.
There is a need for childcare services within the Ryde LGA generally. The projected incoming population is expected to be predominately couple families with no children. However, there may be
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 95
an opportunity to provide some sort of childcare or after school service as part of the multi-purpose facility.
The appropriate management of these issues and the security of delivery of the various open spaces and community facilities proposed under the NRSPP will ensure that the project maximises its potential positive social impacts for the existing and future community
96 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
URBIS ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012 APPENDICES
Appendix A Correspondence from NSW Department of Education and Communities
APPENDICES URBIS
ADP – 1207 – SOC-0001-SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2012
SydneyLevel 23, Darling Park Tower 2201 Sussex Street Sydney, NSW 2000Tel: +612 8233 9900 Fax: +612 8233 9966
MelbourneLevel 12, 120 Collins StreetMelbourne, VIC 3000Tel: +613 8663 4888 Fax: +613 8663 4999
BrisbaneLevel 7, 123 Edward StreetBrisbane, QLD 4000Tel: +617 3007 3800 Fax: +617 3007 3811
PerthLevel 1, 55 St Georges TerracePerth WA 6000Tel: +618 9346 0500Fax: +618 9221 1779
Australia • Asia • Middle [email protected]