![Page 1: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Noise in Radiographic Imaging
![Page 2: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Review: Sources of Noise
• 1) Systematic– Geometric distortion– Non-linearity of detector– Sampling error– Computation (eg Reconstruction) error
• 2) Random – Photon noise– Film grain noise– Electronic Noise– Scattered Radiation
![Page 3: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Noise Characterization• Objective physical Characterization
– Probability density– SNR– Power Spectrum– DQE
• Subjective Characterization • Measure of performance or• Psychophysical evaluations or • correctness of Diagnosis
– TP– TN– FP– FN
![Page 4: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Wiener Spectrum with a Film-Screen system
• Assuming Stationary process means:x-ray exposure has an average flux of
density which is constant over area of the screen.
Therefore, Fluctuation in film exposure and film optical density is described by Power Spectral Densities (or Wiener Spectrum)
It is also called Noise Transfer Properties of the Film-Screen
![Page 5: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Film-Screen Response
• The input is an x-ray flux and the output is a fluctuating density distribution.
• Overall system Response is thus:– 1) Converting from x-ray to an input irradiance
distribution– 2) performing a filtering process which is spreading of a
flush of light from a point source (where x-ray is absorbed in phosphor)
– 3) Converting the filtered exposure fluctuation to optical density fluctuations on film (where light is absorbed to the emulsion grains)
![Page 6: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Film-Screen Interaction Model
![Page 7: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
input irradiance distribution I
• Considering phosphor screen as M slabs of thin thickness Δz, the mean number of randon x-ray photons absorbed within mth slab located at z=zm:
m
m0
0
0
zlayer at absorption ofy probabilit
zlayer at fluenceray -incident x )exp(
inputscreen at irradiated fluence (constant) average
:
)exp(
z
z
where
zz
p
mp
mppm
![Page 8: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Input irradiance distribution II
• Each photon absorption of Φm creates a flash of optical low energy lights g.
Therefore, average optical photon (Energy) density per unit area of layer zm is:
<Em(r)> = g Φm
![Page 9: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Methods for Measuring Noise Power Spectra (Wiener)
• Using Fourier Transform of Autocovariance (Autocorrelation) function of the photon Fluctuation
Recall: <Em(r)> = g Φm
• The Autocorrelation function of the photon distribution is:
REm(L) = <Em(r)Em(r+L)> = g2[Φm δ(L)+ Φ2m]
![Page 10: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
filtering process I • Spreading of light from a point source (where x-ray is
absorbed in phosphor) is described by Point Spread Function Pm(r)
• Therefore the film exposure is defined by random process:
Efm(r) = Em(r)*pm(r)
The Autocorrelation function of filtered photon distribution is:
REfm(L) = <Efm(r)Ef
m(r+L)> = REm(L)*pm(L)•pm(L) =
g2Φm pm(L) • pm(r) + g2 Φ2m
Because (see section 3.5.1): Rout(τ)= p(τ)•p(τ)*Rin(τ)
![Page 11: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
filtering process II
Recall: REfm(L) = g2Φm pm(L) • pm(r) + g2 Φ2m
g2 Φ2m = Square of mean exposure
Autocorrelation function of exposure fluctuation is:RΔEfm(L) = g2Φm pm(L) • pm(r)
Wiener Spectrum is given by FT of the fluctuation RΔEfm(L):
SΔEfm(u) = g2Φm |Pm(u)|2
Where Pm(u) is FT of PSF; pm(r), the optical transfer function of mth layer.
![Page 12: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Autocorrelation of the Fluctuation and Wiener of whole Screen of thickness MΔz=ds
)exp('
)()(')()(S
)]()()[(')()(R
0
2
0
2E
0
2E
z
where
dzuPzzgu
dzLpLpzzgL
pp
z
ds
zz
ds
![Page 13: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Measurable density fluctuation• Optical density fluctuation ΔD is related to exposure
fluctuation ΔE by:
ΔD = 0.434γΔE/Eavg
Therefore Wiener spectrum of density fluctuation is:
Since the Average exposure is given by:
)(434.0
)(
2
uSE
uS Eavg
D
ds
avg dzzzgE0
)(')(
dzuPzzgdzzzg
uS z
ds
dsD
2
0
2
0
2
2
)()(')())(')((
)434.0()(
![Page 14: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Measuring NPS (conceptually)
Measure change in the variation in the amplitude of sine waves with noise (Variable signal)
![Page 15: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Measuring NPS (theoretically)
A uniform x-ray exposure contains noise at all spatial frequencies
![Page 16: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Measuring NPS (experimentally)
![Page 17: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Typical NPS of Film-Screen system
![Page 18: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Paradox
![Page 19: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Imaging concepts used to modelimaging system performance.
![Page 20: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Optimum Filters for noise
• It depends on:– The purpose of system usage– The nature of input to the filter– The definition of the best
• Two main filters:– Wiener filter– Matched filter
![Page 21: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Wiener filter
• The aim is to extract a signal from additive, signal-independent noise
• Spectral information or autocorrelation of signal or/and noise is known
• The signal is tried to be estimated so that the difference between this estimation and the original signal (random process) property is minimized
![Page 22: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Wiener filter• The input to filter is random process y(t) comprising
the real signal contaminated by noise:y(t) = S(t)+n(t)
An estimated signal ŝ(t) is obtained by filtering y(t) with wiener filter p(t):
ŝ(t) = y(t)*p(t)
Then the mean Square error should be minimized by:
<|Ŝ(t) - S(t)|2> = minimum
![Page 23: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Wiener filter
• It can be shown that the p(t) that minimizes <|Ŝ(t) - S(t)|2> makes the error e(t) = Ŝ(t)-S(t) orthogonal to the data y(t).
<[Ŝ(t) - S(t)] y(t’)> = 0Also signal and noise are uncorrelated:
<s(t)n(t’)> = 0Therefore:
<{[s(t)*p(t)] + [n(t)*p(t)] – s(t)} {s(t’)+n(t’)}> =∫<s(t”)s(t’)>p(t-t”)dt” + ∫<n(t”)n(t’)>p(t-t”)dt” - <s(t)s(t’)> = 0
![Page 24: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Wiener filter• Since each term is an autocorrelation function:
Rs(t-t’)*p(t-t’) + Rn(t-t’)*p(t-t’) – Rs(t-t’) = 0
Fourier Transform of this equation gives:Ss(u)P(u) + Sn(u)P(u) = Ss(u)
Where Ss and Sn are power spectral density of s and n, and P(u) is optimum filter with transfer function given as:
P(u) = Ss(u)/[Ss(u)+Sn(u)]
This means P(u) should be large for frequencies at which the signal power is larger than noise power, and vise versa
![Page 25: Noise in Radiographic Imaging. Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic – Geometric distortion – Non-linearity of detector – Sampling error – Computation](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081414/55143dfb550346414e8b47d2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Matched filter
• Wiener filter was optimal for estimation problem based on an unknown random variable as input signal, therefore the estimated filtered output resemble the input.
• Matched filtering is based on a known input signal which should be detected using an optimum filter.
• An optimized filter is the one which maximize SNR of the output. eg;[SNR(t)]2 = [s(t)*p(t)]2 / [n(t)*p(t)]2 = Maximize