Download - Mobilizing Knowledge for innovation in the public sector: role of communities of practice
Mobilizing Knowledge for innovation in the public sector: role of communities of practice
Sujata Gamage, LIRNEasiaFebruary 23-25, 2010
WITS Innovation SymposiumJohannesburg, South Africa
www.lirneasia.net
context
Innovations in government services are critical in developing countries
Very little work on innovations in the public sector
www.lirneasia.net
This presentation
Why the communities of practice concept is particularly fitting for understanding knowledge to innovation processes in the public sector
How do we know a CoP when we see one Manifestation of a community of practice in the solid
waste sector in Sri Lanka Further work to explore the relative importance of
communities of practice in K2I processes in local government
www.lirneasia.net
Thinking on innovation has changed much in the last decade
1995: An innovation system is made up of institutions that create, store and transfer the knowledge, skills and artifacts which define new technologies.” (Metcalfe, 1995)
2006: Research is an important source of knowledge for innovation, but it serves principally as a complement to other knowledge and other activities. Many countries have an urgent need to develop the other elements of the innovation system, particularly more extensive patterns of interaction and the attitudes and practices that support interaction. Once research is better integrated into this wider set of activities, it will become clearer where research capacity is limiting and where it needs strengthening [WB, 2006]
www.lirneasia.net
Mode -1 v. Mode -2
Knowledge produced outside of formal knowledge institutions in the context of work (or mode-2 knowledge) will be increasingly more important
Gibbons, et al. 1994 Novotny, Scott and Gibbons, 2006
www.lirneasia.net
Empirical support for importance of mode-2 knowledge
INNOVATION SURVEYS: The most important links and collaborations for businesses are with other enterprises, including customers, suppliers and even competitors (HSRC, 2009).
KIBS LITERATURESoft’ sources such as suppliers and customers and skilled personnel or consultants recruited are critical for innovation in knowledge intensive business services (KIBS) (from Tether, 2004; Freel, 2006 in the KIBS literature)
www.lirneasia.net
Communities of practice
Definition: Groups of people who share a concern for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly (Lave and Wenger, 1991)Context: Apprentices and how they learn; focus
on cooperation, not competition or incentives Corollary: A Community of practice is a means of
sharing mode-2 knowledge to innovate (within an organization or a sector)
Use: In the corporate sector for knowledge management within organizations or across divisions; within a sector various trade associations serve as CoPs. Public sector
www.lirneasia.net
Communities of practice in the public sector
Applicable to instances where there are multiple branches of an agency; or multiple institutions providing same service to different communities (e.g. local government)
Since agencies or LGAs are not competing for markets, knowledge sharing can be more free, but,
In the absence of competition or incentives, members may have less inclination to use community resource to innovate and improve own performance
www.lirneasia.net
Survey of 109 local government authorities in 3 Provinces in Sri Lanka
www.lirneasia.net
Key questions
SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGEWho did you contact in the last 12 months to get the information/knowledge you needed
SUCCESSWhat percent of your waste is separated and processed prior to dumping
www.lirneasia.net
Connectedness v. success of 109 Solid Waste managers in Wayamba, Sabaragamuwaad Western Provinces in Sri Lanka
No
successSome success
No connectedness 42% 1% 43%
Some connectedness 40% 17% 57%
82% 18% 109
www.lirneasia.net
Connectedness v. Success of 109 Solid Waste managers in Wayamba, Sabaragamuwaad Western Provinces in Sri Lanka
No
successSome success
No connectedness 42% 1% 43%
Some connectedness 40% 17% 57%
82% 18% 109
www.lirneasia.net
Sources of Knowledge (19/109 successful LAs; almost all received financial support from govt .agencies)
Number %
Gov+ 2 11%
Peer+ 10 53%
Other 7 37%
PEER: Anupa Pasqual, Balangoda UC, Bandaragama PS, Bulathsinhala PS, Kuruwita PS, Mawanella PS, Negombo MC, Rathnapura MC, Weligama UC
OTHER: Unnamed Expert-India; Pilapitiya-Expert Sri Lanka (4), Basnayake- Pofessor, U Perdeniya (on volunteer basis or as consultants)
Peers are an important source of knowledge
www.lirneasia.net
Connectedness of SW Managers in Sri LankaEmerging community of practice?
www.lirneasia.net
Issue
Of the 109 LGAs in the survey, 17% perform as a CoP 1% performs on own 40% Others connected but do not perform 42% are just happy not to do anything
www.lirneasia.net
Ongoing Research
How important are CoPs for innovation? i.e. Will there continue to be more innovation within the CoP than outside? Facilitate further Cooperation in knowledge
sharing in one or more provinces Introduce an element of competition Follow the growth of the CoP and its effect
on innovation
www.lirneasia.net
Summary
Innovative practitioners in solid waste management value their peers as sources of knowledge
They are connected to each other through knowledge-intensive links. They use the knowledge to improve performance. i.e. they form a CoP
This observation has to led to the implementation of some exciting new action research which may actually lead to better service delivery by local authorities in selected provinces in Sri Lanka while yielding new insights
www.lirneasia.netResults
www.lirneasia.net
Standards and Certificates
www.lirneasia.net
Training of trainers Curriculum writing
www.lirneasia.net
Training of trainers
www.lirneasia.net
40 personnel from 10 LAs at Balangoda UC Training Center
22
www.lirneasia.net
Thank you