MGT MGT MGT MGT MGT
ASSESSMENT REPORT
Regarding the IP\RESISTIVITY and MAGNETIC SURVEYS at PAGWACHUAN LAKE - GRID 2, LONGLAC, ONTARIO on behalf of PRODIGY GOLD INC. VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd. Suite 2311, 7 King Street East Toronto, ON M5C 3C5
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 4
2. GENERAL SURVEY DETAILS ................................................................................................................... 5
LOCATION .......................................................................................................................................... 5
ACCESS ............................................................................................................................................. 6
SURVEY GRID ..................................................................................................................................... 6
3. SURVEY WORK UNDERTAKEN ............................................................................................................... 7
GENERALITIES .................................................................................................................................... 7
PERSONNEL ....................................................................................................................................... 7
SPECIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................................. 7
INSTRUMENTATION .............................................................................................................................. 9
PARAMETERS ..................................................................................................................................... 9
MEASUREMENT ACCURACY AND REPEATABILITY ..................................................................................... 9
DATA PRESENTATION .......................................................................................................................... 9
4. RESULTS AND SUMMARY INTERPRETATION .................................................................................... 11
PREFACE ......................................................................................................................................... 11
INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY PLAN MAP RESULTS .............................................................. 11
PDP SURVEY DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................... 14
TOTAL FIELD MAGNETIC DATA INTERPRETATION ................................................................................... 15
FFT PROCESSING ............................................................................................................................. 16
5. CONLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................. 18
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
APPENDIX B: IRIS IP6 DIGITAL FORMAT
APPENDIX C: THEORETICAL BASIS AND SURVEY PROCEDURES
APPENDIX D: INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS
APPENDIX E: LIST OF MAPS
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 iii
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
Figure 1: General Property Location of Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2 ................................................... 5 Figure 2: Pole-Dipole Schematic Array Layout ................................................................................... 8 Figure 3: Total Chargeability Plan Map over Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2 ......................................... 11 Figure 4: Total Chargeability Data Statistics .................................................................................... 12 Figure 5: Apparent Resistivity Plan Map over Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2........................................ 13 Figure 6: Apparent Resistivity Data Statistics................................................................................... 13 Figure 7: Stacked Pseudosections of Induced Polarization over Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2............ 14 Figure 8: Stacked Pseudosections Apparent Resistivity over Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2 ................ 15 Figure 9: Total Magnetic Field Plan Map over Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2 ....................................... 16 Table I: Pole-Dipole Survey Coverage ............................................................................................... 8 Table II: Magnetic Survey Coverage .................................................................................................. 9
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 4
1. INTRODUCTION
MGT Project #: P-236
Project Name: Pagwachaun Lake - Grid 2
Survey Period: August 11 to September 2nd, 2011
Survey Type: Induced Polarization, Resistivity and Magnetic
Client: Prodigy Gold Inc.
Client Address: Suite 1205 – 700 West Pender Street Vancouver, B.C. V6C 1G8
Objectives:
1. Document the physical properties of the major lithologic units and alteration patterns for compilation with the exploration database and verify some of prominent MMI anomalies over the established grid.
2. Generate a geological model using the Time Domain Induced Polarization \
Resistivity \ Magnetic data. 3. Increase the exploration program efficiency by better directing the future
exploration works and to assist in mapping of general geology, locating structural and alteration features that may favor the precious and base metals presence in the surveyed areas.
Pole-Dipole arrays were designed to investigate in the 30-150 meters depth range.
Report Type: Assessment Report
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 5
2. GENERAL SURVEY DETAILS
LOCATION
Province: Ontario
Country: Canada
Nearest Settlement: Longlac Twp.
UTM Coordinates: UTM Coordinates (NAD 83, Zone 16N):
Figure 1: General Property Location of Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
Grid 2 PAG
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 6
ACCESS
Base of Operations: Longlac, Ontario
Grid Location: Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2 is located 30 km east of Longlac.
Mode of Access: The surveyed grid area is accessible by truck.
SURVEY GRID
Coordinate Reference System: UTM (Map Datum NAD83)
Established: Prior and during the survey execution
Line Separation: 100 meters
Station Interval: 25 meters
Station Interval Magnetic Survey: 12.5 meters
Method of Chaining: Metric-chained
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 7
3. SURVEY WORK UNDERTAKEN
GENERALITIES
Surveyed By: Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd.
Survey Dates: August 11TH to September 2nd, 2011
Mob/Demob Days: 1 day
Survey Coverage: approx. 10.0 km
PERSONNEL
FIELD CREW
Project Manager: Genc Kallfa (Toronto, ON) George Kapllani (Toronto, ON)
Field Assistants: Ryan Goudy (Sudbury, ON) Mike Decosse (Ottawa, ON) Two helpers provided by client August 3rd, 2011)
SPECIFICATIONS
Arrays: Pole-Dipole (see Fig.2)
Transmitting dipole spacing: Pole-Dipole: C1-C2 = 1.0 km minimum
Array Parameters: Pole-Dipole: n=2a, a=25m, dipole 1 to 6
Sampling Interval: 25 meters
Total Pole-Dipole Lines: 13 lines
Areal Coverage: approx 0.9 km2
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 8
Figure 2: Pole-Dipole Schematic Array Layout
SURVEY COVERAGE:
1. Pole-Dipole Array: 9,295 m (see Table I)
LINE START END TOTAL (m) L1+00E 0 1150N 1150 L2+00E 275S 400N 675 L3+00E 275S 400N 675 L4+00E 275S 400N 675 L5+00E 275S 400N 670 L6+00E 250S 400N 950 L7+00E 175S 400N 575 L8+00E 200S 400N 600 L9+00E 250S 400N 650 L10+00E 225S 400N 625 L11+00E 275S 400N 675 L12+00E 300S 400N 700 L13+00E 275S 400N 675
TOTAL 9295 Table I: Pole-Dipole Survey Coverage
2. Magnetic Survey: 10,595 m (see Table II)
LINE START END TOTAL (m) L1+00E 0 1150N 1150 L2+00E 275S 400N 675 L3+00E 275S 400N 675 L4+00E 275S 400N 675 L5+00E 275S 400N 670 L6+00E 250S 400N 950 L7+00E 175S 400N 575
DIPOLE-POLE ROLL-ALONG ARRAY
(COVERAGE 6 POINTS PER SPREAD
Rx Tx300m
N=1-6
PREVIOUSSPREAD
NEXTSPREAD
N=1N=2
N=3N=4
N=5N=6
A =50m
CURRENT SPREAD
C2
C1
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 9
L8+00E 200S 400N 600 L9+00E 250S 400N 650 L10+00E 225S 400N 625 L11+00E 275S 400N 675 L12+00E 300S 400N 700 L13+00E 275S 400N 675 Base Line 0 1300E 1300
TOTAL 10595 Table II: Magnetic Survey Coverage
INSTRUMENTATION
Receiver: IRIS IP-6 (time domain / 10 channels)
Transmitter: Walcer 9000 Transmitter
Power Supply: MG-12 Honda 12.0 KW Generator
PARAMETERS
Input Waveform: 0.0625 Hz square wave at 50% duty cycle (16 seconds On/Off)
Receiver Sampling Parameters: Customize windows
Measured Parameters:
1) Chargeability in millivolts/Volt (10 time slices + total area under decay curve) 2) Primary Voltage in millivolts and Input Current in amperes for Resistivity
calculation according to the pole-dipole and gradient arrays geometry factor1.
MEASUREMENT ACCURACY AND REPEATABILITY
Chargeability: generally 0.5 mV/V.
Resistivity: less than 5% cumulative error from Primary voltage and Input current measurements.
DATA PRESENTATION
Maps:
Reconnaissance Plan Maps: Posted/contoured Total Chargeability, Apparent Resistivity and Magnetic, at 1:2500 scale.
1 See BRGM/IRIS IP6 receiver operating manual and Appendix B.
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 10
Pole-Dipole Pseudosections: Posted/contoured pseudo depth section maps of combined Total Chargeability and Apparent Resistivity at 1: 2500 scale (non-terrain corrected).
Digital:
TDIP Raw data: Iris IP-6 format (see Appendix B) Gradient Processed data: Geosoft .XYZ files using the following format:
Column 1 Station - Eastings, in meters Column 2 Line – Northings, in meters Column 3 Total Chargeability, in mV/V Column 4 Apparent Resistivity, in -m
Pole-Dipole Processed data: Geosoft .GDB files using the following format:
Column 1 Line - Northings, in meters Column 2 Station - Eastings, in meters Column 3 Estimated Depth in Pseudosection, in meters Column 4 to 10 Time Windows of Total Chargeability, in mV/V Column 11 Total Chargeability, in mV/V Column 12 Reading Dipole Number Column 13 Transmitting Dipole Electrode Position, in meters Column 14 and 15 Receiving Dipole Electrode Position, in meters Column 16 Primary Voltage, in mV Column 17 Induced Current, in Amps Column 18 Self-Potential Column 19 Flag Channel using the Quality Control Column 20 Type of reading (0 – single reading; 1- average reading) Column 21 Contact Resistivity, in kohm-m Column 22 Apparent Resistivity, in ohm-m Column 23 Total Chargeability, in mV/V Column 24 Reading Error Column 25 Number of Reading Cycles
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 11
4. RESULTS AND SUMMARY INTERPRETATION
PREFACE
The Interpretation of exploration data requires combining different types of information to provide a geologic model. It implies bringing together all data components into an image that makes conceptual sense in terms of the geology of the exploration area. The identification of geologic objects and the inference of a spatial description of the lithology—consistent with all available information—are the objectives of the process. The more information that can be utilized, the greater the degree of confidence is going to be in the model generated (more certain is the result of the inference). The interpretational process should serve to combine different types of geophysical data, petrophysical
information on the rock properties, and information on the geology of the area.
INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY PLAN MAP RESULTS
The following discussion summarizes the results of the Pole-Dipole TDIP \ Resistivity survey over the PAGWACHAUN LAKE – GRID 2, undertaken by MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD in August - September 2011. The present geophysical interpretation makes use of TD Induced Polarization \ Resistivity data, created from the results of deepest level (n=6) of Pole-Dipole survey, with chargeability parameter able to detect and discern mineralization ranging from disseminate to massive concentrations and resistivity data mostly characterizing the geological structures.
Figure 3: Total Chargeability Plan Map over Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
The original survey design consisted in a combination of gradient and PDP dipole surveys; however due poor grid accessibility, only Pole-Dipole survey was undertaken.
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 12
IP\Resistivity results over the PAGWACHAUN LAKE – GRID 2 successfully define the geophysical signatures potentially associated to lithologic changes, structures, and chemical alteration. Total chargeability and apparent resistivity show that the property is generally characterized by relatively high resistivity, especially to the grid center and SW, suggesting the predominance of low conductivity geological units, such as mafic units and felsic\qtz\carbonate alteration and questionable to weak chargeability responses at depth.
The authors would like to emphasize the fact that the induced polarization phenomena, although generally less intense, is also found in the absence of electrically conductive bodies (known as non-metallic or electrolytic IP). To explain electrolytic IP, one often considers the presence of clay particles, whose surface would be charged negatively and hence would induce an accumulation of cations in the electrolyte. However, it is quite possible that the increase of secondary mineralization in the rock, might as well give considerable chargeability responses, such is the case of pyroxenite.
Induced polarization data indicate the occurrence of metallic/electronic/electrode chargeability. This phenomenon may be observed in electrically conductive bodies and/or non-metallic/electrolytic/membrane IP, which is also found in the absence of electrically conductive bodies. Consequently, an IP map might represent the distribution of metallic and non-metallic responses.
The gradient total chargeability responses at PAGWACHAUN LAKE – GRID 2 (Figure 3) are characterized by narrow range in strength, varying between questionable\weak to strong but generally falling in the questionable category (avg. 3.0 mV/V) – consistent with weakly mineralized environment, with the peaks most likely corresponding to higher mineralization content\graphite\argillitic alteration at depth. In addition, it is important to emphasize that the chargeabilities seem to be stronger to the grid south, likely representing increase sulphide\graphite\argillitic content. Statistical analysis of total chargeability data (Figure 4) shows that only 8 % of total chargeability data falls in moderate to strong category and almost 90 % falling in questionable to weak category (<8.5 mV/V), suggesting low contrast of IP anomalies over the background.
Figure 4: Total Chargeability Data Statistics
Total chargeability plan map shows the presence of several, chaotic and not line-to-line correlated induced polarization signatures, most likely related to the presence of sulphides or argillitic content; however it is important to emphasize that the southern anomalies must be better covered with
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 13
geophysical surveys.
Figure 5: Apparent Resistivity Plan Map over Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
Figure 6: Apparent Resistivity Data Statistics
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 14
Furthermore, the geophysical survey was extended to north in order to verify some of the prominent geological outcrops. Induced polarization data show the presence of two moderate anomalous signatures; however there is not enough geophysical coverage to conclude about the nature and extension of these anomalies.
Apparent Resistivity data (Figure 5) display a wide range, varying between 107 ohmm and 117.6 kohmm (avg. 5.6 kohmm); indicative of relatively low porosity bedrock at depth – with the average consistent with compact mafic rocks. The apparent resistivity data define high resistivity almost NE-SW trending zones, interpreted as diabase\qtz\carbonate altered dykes or volcanics. The very high resistivity values possibly reflect the shallow occurrence of volcanics or interpreted dykes. High resistivity zones are relatively thin, with the exception of some localized high resistivity zones to the grid north; long trending generally showing very good line-to-line correlation; however local breaks and displacements are observed suggesting aggressive tectonic activity.
Statistical analysis of apparent resistivity (Figure 6) shows that less 30% of resistivity data falls in low to moderate category, indicator of porous rocks at depth and the rest fall in high category, suggesting compact rocks presence.
PDP SURVEY DESCRIPTION
Pole-Dipole survey shows that the total chargeability is characterized by questionable chargeability signatures, with anomalous chargeabilities ranging from 8 mV/V to 14.7 mV/V, usually indicator of moderate to relatively high mineralization concentration.
Figure 7: Stacked Pseudosections of Induced Polarization over Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
Surveyed data show the presence of moderate to strong induced polarization anomalies to the south of
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 15
surveyed lines (Figure 7), generally associated with low to contact\nil resistivity, indicator of massive mineralization or graphitic presence. Anomalous induced polarization signatures are not properly covered and south extension of geophysical survey is strongly recommended.
Figure 8: Stacked Pseudosections Apparent Resistivity over Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
Pole-Dipole data shows that the surveyed area is characterized by the presence of low\lower resistivity to the grid south and in surface (Figure 8), likely representing sedimentary\metamorphic units. Furthermore, the extended L.1+00E shows the presence of very high resistivity to the north e.g. granitic units; however proper geophysical coverage is required in order to define the spatial extension of resistive units.
TOTAL FIELD MAGNETIC DATA INTERPRETATION
The fundamental factor influencing potential field anomalies is the mineralogy of the rocks, which control magnetic susceptibility. The magnetic field is controlled by the accessory minerals in a rock, principally magnetite and their distribution may not be uniform for various reasons: concentration in distinct layers; uneven hydrothermal alteration etc.
Magnetic survey is a proven efficient tool in mineral\iron prospecting and\or the delineation of geological contacts between intrusive rocks and sedimentary units. Sedimentary rocks usually exert such a small magnetic effect compare to the intrusives that most variations in magnetic intensity measurable at the surface result from intrusive rocks.
Ground total field magnetic results on the PAGWACHAUN LAKE – GRID 2 (Figure 9) display relatively wide variation in Total Field Magnetic (TFM). The diurnally and loop corrected magnetic contour maps are dominated by disturbances most likely related to the local disturbances and less to major geological changes (broad scale signatures).
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 16
The TFM disturbances are mostly observed center and south of surveyed grid, suggesting high content of magnetic material in the area and clearly forming long NE-SW trending magnetic lineaments that seem to line-to-line correlate. Of note, the magnetic signatures do not to correlate with induced polarization or apparent resistivity data.
Figure 9: Total Magnetic Field Plan Map over Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
FFT PROCESSING
Vertical Derivative transforms are intended to facilitate the interpretation of gravity and magnetic maps. They are enhancement techniques which amplify the shorter wavelength features relatively to those with longer wavelengths. Vertical derivatives of any order may be prescribed. The higher the order the greater is the relative amplification of higher frequencies and greater too is the risk of accentuating noise to an unacceptable degree. For this reason vertical derivatives of order three and above are hardly ever calculated. Thus the First Vertical Derivative (FVD) and second vertical Derivative (SVD) transforms are the only transforms of this type that are routinely generated. The first vertical derivative can be used as an alternative to a residual display. The SVD or FVD are calculated using a filtered and unmasked grid of magnetic anomaly.
The following briefly discusses the FFT processing results of gridded data:
High Pass First Vertical Derivative (FVD) of RTE Data): Designed specifically to enhance the shallowest geologic sources in the data. As with other filters that enhance the high-wavenumber components of the spectrum, low-pass filters are applied to remove high-wavenumber noise.
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 17
In order to remove the directional ringing problems caused by the gridding process, a directional cosine filter was used and highly directional features can be isolated. The First Vertical Derivative of magnetic data shows the presence of NE-SW magnetic trend, especially to the grid south. Minor displacement or breaks are observed, but no major faults are interpreted from the FVD plan map.
High Pass Second Vertical Derivative (SVD) of RTE Data: The primary property of the SVD transform is that the ZERO CONTOUR represents the point of inflexion on the original anomaly curve which approximates the locations of edges of the causative bodies, providing that the bodies are shallow and have vertical sides. A series of SVD processing was undertaken however the FFT result were not different from the FVD results, previously described.
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 18
5. CONLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Pole-Dipole time domain induced polarization \ resistivity and magnetic surveys over the PAGWACHAUN LAKE – GRID 2 have identified geophysical signatures, potentially related to lithologic contacts or geochemical alteration, fault-fracture, structures and, most importantly, the presence of increased chargeability, potentially related to mineralization.
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD will undertake a more detailed data interpretation, including possible geoscientific data integration and visualization.
Induced Polarization and Resistivity responses at PAGWACHAUN LAKE – GRID 2 can be classified based on their associated resistivity and strength, in IF\Graphite\MS\sulphide bearing type of signatures is characterized by increased chargeability associated to conductive host (low resistivity).
Prominent Induced Polarization responses in plan range from weak to strong, most likely suggesting moderate content of sulphides\Fe+2 rich rocks in the property
Magnetic survey over the PAGWACHAUN LAKE – GRID 2 accurately contours the presence of increased phyrrotite\ pyroxenite\IF or increase Fe2+ presence.
Considering the complexity of geological model and styles of mineralization, the authors strongly recommend undertaking secondary discriminative methods such as geochemistry\MMI surveys over most prominent geophysical targets in order to better select DH targets.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED
GENC KALLFA, B.SC., P.GEO. LUDVIG KAPLLANI. PH.D., A.I.P.G. Senior Geophysicist Senior Geophysicist
Toronto, November 2011
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 19
APPENDIX A
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
I, Ludvig Kapllani, declare that:
1. I am a consulting geophysicist with residence in Toronto, Ontario and am presently working in this capacity with Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd. of Toronto, Ontario.
2. I obtained a Bachelor’s of Science Degree, (B.Sc.), Geophysics, in spring 1976, a Masters of Science Degree, (M.Sc.), Geophysics, in June 1986, Ph.D in January 1995, Geophysics, from Polytechnic University of Tirana, Albania and Associate Professor, February 1995 (titles recognized by University of Toronto, August 1999).
3. I have practiced my profession continuously since May 1976, in North and South America, Africa, Asia and Europe.
4. I am member of AMERICAN INSTITUTION OF PROFESSIONAL GEOLOGISTS (AIPG), membership number CPG-1138.
5. I have no interest, nor do I expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of PRODIGY GOLD INC.
6. I am the author of this report and the statements contained represent my professional opinion based on my
consideration of the information available to me at the time of writing this report.
Toronto, Ontario November 2011
Ludvig Kapllani, M.Sc., Ph.D. Senior Geophysicist
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd.
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 20
APPENDIX A
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
I, Genc Kallfa, declare that:
1. I am a consulting geophysicist with residence in Toronto, Ontario and am presently working in this capacity with Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd. of Toronto, Ontario.
2. I obtained a Bachelor’s of Science Degree, (B.Sc.), Geophysics, from the Polytechnic University, in Tirana, Albania, in spring 1987.
3. I have practiced my profession continuously since May 1987, in North and South America, Africa, Asia and Europe.
4. I am member of ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL GEOSCIENTISTS OF ONTARIO (APGO), membership number 0404.
5. I have no interest, nor do I expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of PRODIGY GOLD INC.
6. I am the author of this report and the statements contained represent my professional opinion based on my
consideration of the information available to me at the time of writing this report.
Toronto, Ontario November 2011
Genc Kallfa, B.Sc., P.Geo. (ON) Senior Geophysicist
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd.
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 21
APPENDIX B
IRIS IP6 DIGITAL FORMAT
#1388 Aug 16 2004 12:58 dipole 4 trigger 1 domain Time T wave Programmable wind. Grad. RCTGL array V= 42.734 Sp= 6 I= 540.00 Rs= 15.46 Ro= 27563.8 Ohm.m M= 4.37 E= 0.1 M1= 12.11 M2= 10.29 M3= 8.50 M4= 7.12 M5= 6.10 M6= 5.09 M7= 3.88 M8= 2.95 M9= 2.49 M10= 2.14 cycl= 12 Time= 4000 V_D= 2620 M_D= 120 T_M1= 120 T_M2= 120 T_M3= 180 T_M4= 240 T_M5= 240 T_M6= 480 T_M7= 480 T_M8= 640 T_M9= 640 T_M10= 640 Spacing config. : Metric XP= -475.0 Line= 800.0 D= -25.0 AB/2= 650.0 #1389 Aug 16 2004 12:58 dipole 5 trigger 1 domain Time T wave Programmable wind. Grad. RCTGL array V= 140.057 Sp= -11 I= 540.00 Rs= 10.22 Ro= 97194.5 Ohm.m M= 4.16 E= 0.0 M1= 12.07 M2= 10.23 M3= 8.37 M4= 6.87 M5= 5.78 M6= 4.78 M7= 3.78 M8= 2.67 M9= 2.26 M10= 1.97 cycl= 12 Time= 4000 V_D= 2620 M_D= 120 T_M1= 120 T_M2= 120 T_M3= 180 T_M4= 240 T_M5= 240 T_M6= 480 T_M7= 480 T_M8= 640 T_M9= 640 T_M10= 640 Spacing config. : Metric XP= -500.0 Line= 800.0 D= -25.0 AB/2= 650.0
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 22
APPENDIX C
THEORETICAL BASIS AND SURVEY PROCEDURES
POLE-DIPOLE TDIP SURVEY
The collected data sets are reduced, using IP6 receiver, to apparent resistivity, total chargeability and metal factor as explained in the following figures and equations: Using the following diagram (Fig. C1) for the electrode configuration and nomenclature:2
DIPOLE-POLE ARRAY
CP2 P1 C1a na
Figure C1: Pole-Dipole Electrode Array
the apparent resistivity is given by:
metres-ohm I
VP a 1nn= 2a
where: “a” is the MN dipole spacing (metres) “n” is the separation parameter between C1 and P1P2 “VP” is the primary voltage measured between P1P2 (volts)
“I” is the output current between C1C2 (amperes) The Total Chargeability calculations are the same as the Gradient arrays as explained above:
The sets are then ready for plotting, profiling using the Geosoft SushiTM program. The Apparent Resistivity, Total Chargeability and Metal Factor (IP/Resistivity*1000) results of the Pole-Dipole surveys are presented in pseudo section format. All resistivities are in �-metres and chargeabilities in mV/V.
2 From Telford, et al., Applied Geophysics, Cambridge U Press, New York, 1983..
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 23
APPENDIX D
INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS
IRIS ELREC 6 RECEIVER
Weather proof case Dimensions: 31 cm x 21 cm x 21 cm Weight: 6 kg with dry cells 7.8 kg with rechargeable bat. Operating temperature: -20C to 70C (-40C to 70C with optional screen heater) Storage: (-40C to 70C) Input channels: 6 Input impedance: 10 Mohm Input overvoltage protection: up to 1000 volts Input voltage range: 10 V maximum on each dipole 15 V maximum sum over ch 2 to 6 SP compensation: automatic 10 V with linear drift correction up to 1 mV/s Noise rejection: 50 to 60 Hz powerline rejection 100 dB common mode rejection (for Rs=0) automatic stacking Primary voltage resolution: 1 V after stacking accuracy: 0.3% typically; maximum 1 over whole temperature range Secondary voltage windows: up to 10 windows; 3 preset window specs. plus fully programmable sampling. Sampling rate: 10 ms Synchronization accuracy: 10 ms, minimum 40 V Chargeability resolution: 0.1 mV/V accuracy: typically 0.6%. maximum 2% of reading 1 mV/V for Vp > 10 mV Grounding resistance: 0.1 to 467 kohm Memory capacity: 2505 records, 1 dipole/record Data transfer: serial link @ 300 to 19200 baud remote control capability through serial link @ 19200 baud
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
P-236 – November 2011 24
APPENDIX D
INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS
Walcer Tx 900 Transmitter
Input: 120V line to neutral
400 Hz / 3 Phases
Powered by MG-12
Output: 100V – 3200V in 10 steps 5 mA – 20 A 9.0 KVA Output Switching: TD: Seconds on/off switching 1,2,4 and 8 seconds Size: 63cm X 54cm X 25cm Weight: 44 kg
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
QS-236 – November 2011 25
APPENDIX D
INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS
MG-12 GENERATOR
Output: 120 – 220 V AC
400 Hz / 3 Phases
Generator: Bendix Aircraft Type Forced Air Cooled Engine: 20 HP Honda Twin Cylinder Size: 75cm X 70cm X 25cm Weight: 125 kg
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd Prodigy Gold Inc. IP\Resistivity\Magnetic Surveys Pagwachuan Lake – Grid 2
QS-236 – November 2011 26
APPENDIX E
LIST OF MAPS
Posted/Contoured Plan Maps at 1:2500 scale
PLAN TOTAL CHARGEABILITY APPARENT RESISTIVITY TOTAL MAGNETIC FIELD P236-PLAN-CHG-1 P236-PLAN-RES-1 P236-MAGCONT-GRID 2 TOTAL 1 1 1
Pseudosections at 1:2500 scale:
LINE QUANTITATIVE SECTION L1+00E Pseudosection Plot 1+00E L2+00E Pseudosection Plot 2+00E L3+00E Pseudosection Plot 3+00E L4+00E Pseudosection Plot 4+00E L5+00E Pseudosection Plot 5+00E L6+00E Pseudosection Plot 6+00E L7+00E Pseudosection Plot 7+00E L8+00E Pseudosection Plot 8+00E L9+00E Pseudosection Plot 9+00E
L10+00E Pseudosection Plot 10+00E L11+00E Pseudosection Plot 11+00E L12+00E Pseudosection Plot 12+00E L13+00E Pseudosection Plot 13+00E
TOTAL 13
Average IP Resistivity mVN Ohm*m
6.5 5000
4500
5.5 4000
3500
4.5 3000
4 2500
3.5 2000
1500
2.5 1000
500 ------1.5
2+00 s Filter 6.19 5.1 4.8
Average IP mVN
Resistivity Ohm*m
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
Filter 378
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
2+00 s 416 490
1+00 s 4.67 4.48 3.88 3.4 2.65
1+00 s 529 621 670 772 877
310
Resistivity Average IP Ohm*m mVN
5000 6.5
___ / 4500
4000 5.5
3500
-~~-~ 3000 4.5
2500 4
2000 3.5
1500
1000 2.5
500
1.5
0+00 N 1+00 N 2+00 N 3+00 N 2.3 2.05 1.84 1.9 1.98 2.09 2.27 2.78 3.09 3.27 3.21 2.89 3.02 2.91 2.85 2.75 Filter
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
0+00 N 1+00 N 2+00 N 3+00 N 954 1280 1690 2010 1870 1450 1610 1920 2210 2430 2450 2770 3260 3560 3560 3620 4960 Filter
1173
1241
1391
/ 1836 2943 %5322 ~3626
12~1507-1394 1458-~ 2411 ( 4521 6312 7090
1348/ 1902~~1288 1334 --------~ 1984 2200 2117 3419 ( 6095 7656
1237 ~1773/ 2693~3152-~¥ 1940---2~ 2578 2631 2803/ 4620 7261
1385-------- 1577 1641 I 2516 ( 3492 4435 ~ 2365 2243 2777 2965 ~ 3543 ~28 / / ~ ~ /
1692 1976 211>§-;)054 4541 5506 4928 2788 2803 3040 3581 3844 3781
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
Average IP mVN
Resistivity Ohm*m
Pseudo Section Plot 13+00 E
Pant-leg Filter ** * *
Dipole-Pole Array
a
' '
na
/ /
a
/ /
* * 'o/ plot point
a=25 m
* *
Logarit~IT.Ji% Contours . '2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, ...
• 0
D
25
INTERPRETATION Strong increase in polarization accompanied by marked decrease in resistivity.
Well defined increase in polarization without marked resistivity decrease.
Poorly defined polarization increase with no resistivity signature.
Low resistivity feature.
Scale 1 :2500 0 25 50 75 100 125
(meters)
PRODIGY GOLD INC
150
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
PAGWACHUAN GRID 2
LONGLAC,ON Date: 01/09/2011 Interpretation:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD
Average IP Resistivity Resistivity Average IP mVN Ohm•m Ohm· m mVN
9 9000 ,----,,----------,-----,-----------,-----,-----,-----,-----,-----,-----,-----,----,-----,-----,-----,-----,-----------------------------,----,,----------,-----------,-----,-----,-----------,-----------,-----------,----------,-----------,-----,-----,-----,-----,-----,----------,- 9000 - 9
8
6
5
4
3
2
Average IP mVN
Resistivity Ohm*m
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000 -- - - - ---=-~=-----=::::---- - - ------------------------ -2000
1000
8+00 s Filter 3.76 3.78 3.66 4.01 4.1 4.7
no2 4
n=4
n=S
n=6
8+00 s Filter 3150 3340 3030 2940 2420 2910
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=6
n=7
6+00 s 4.81 5.95 6.71 6.67 8.17
6+00 s 3020 3830 4710 4360 3280
---- - - -
4+00 s 2+00 s 6.97 7.5 7 .34 6.78 6.56 6.09 3.39 2.56 6 .07 5.68 4.93 4.57 4.45 3.9
4+00 s 2+00 s 2550 46 10 4960 4590 8330 6520 967 644 437 527 510 591 639 835
3
0+00 N 3.93 3.44 3 .02 2 .66 2.34 2.05 1.99 2.65 2.53
2
2
0+00 N 943 951 1370 1340 1720 1890 1480 131 0 1410
1794 3231 3803 5148
2+00 N 2 .59 2 .69 2.81 3.08 2.95 2.74 2 .99
3~3-3
:(: >. < l:~· 4- 3 3 4
2+00 N 1600 1660 1930 2980 184 0 2000 3990
2.42 2.29
3580 3330
- 8000
- 7000
6000
2 .79 Filter
no2
n=4
n=5
n=6
5270 Filter
~ \ \ 54\ 39 ~~- 3565
2284-.........__ . 2242 9036 9533
\ ----..._./ \ \ 3:272 - ...... 2279 3369 \ 11402
n=2
n=3
\ \ '---, J "" \ - 1470 2058 4655 3104 3802
1769 1908 / 268~ r6~35/ --;;;--------w?--~~5 2448 \ 3329 6625
n=4
n=6
n=7
- 8
- 7
6
5
- 4
- 3
- 2
Average IP mVN
Resistivity Ohm *m
Pseudo Section Plot 12+00 E
Pant-leg Filter
* * * *
* * * *
Dipole-Pole Array
a
'
na
' / ' / ' /
'"' plot point
a
a =25m
Logarithmic Contours
1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5 , 7.5, 10, ...
Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150
(meters)
PRODIGY GOLD INC INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
PAGWACHUAN GRID 2
LONGLAC, ON Date: 09/11/2011 Interpretation:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD
Average IP Resistivity mVN Ohm*m
11 7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000 4
1000
2+00 s Filter 10.4 8.87 8.21
Average IP n=2
mVN n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
2+00 s Filter 467 519 642
Resistivity n=2
Ohm*m n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
/~///~',
---~
---------------------=-===-~ ==----- ~ ~- ~~~ ~ = ~~ -~- c:::<" -----.-- - - ----
1+00 s 8.37 8.35 8.27 5.75
1+00 s 693 892 1130 1380
0+00 N 1+00 N 4.35 3.58 3.04 2.47 2.12 2.05 2.23
0+00 N 1+00 N 1260 1180 1270 1170 1130 1300 1670
1345
1440~1518~ 1170 1 1727 ~1902~ 1612~
1437 2214 2994-----3448 2022- 1911 1401
2.87
1770
I ' -------- ..________ ~ 1764 2720 3613 300§ 2319 - 22§0 1701'
2+00 N 3+00 N 3.24 3.38 3.98 2.54 2.75 2.83 3.13 2.61 2.32
2+00 N 3+00 N 1640 1460 1780 2170 2480 4780 4810 5650 6760
Resistivity Average IP Ohm*m mVN
7000 11
6000 10
5000
4000
3000
2000 4
1000
2.42 Filter
·4 n=2 Average IP mVN
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
5820 Filter
Resistivity Ohm*m
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
Pseudo Section Plot 11+00 E
Pant-leg Filter ** * * * * * *
Dipole-Pole Array
a
' '
na
/ /
'o/ plot point
a
/ /
a=25 m
Logarithmic Contours
1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, ...
Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150
(meters)
PRODIGY GOLD INC INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
PAGWACHUAN GRID 2
LONGLAC,ON Date: 01/09/2011 Interpretation:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD
Average IP Resistivity mVN Ohm'm
11 5500
Average IP mVN
Resistivity Ohm'm
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
Frlter 3.49
n~2
n=4
n=S
n=6
Filter 2450
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=6
n=7
8+00 s 3 05
8+00 s 2640
3508
6+00 s 2.86 2.76 3.6 4.37 4.99 5.72 6.65 7.41 7.73 10.7 10.5 9.44 8.24 8.4
6+00 s 2970 2730 2970 3070 3570 3990 5430 4140 3490 4700 3620 4500 3970 4670
•······~~=--~~~==~- ~7 /- 2500 '.. 1743- 24~3105 --2795 -- ---- --- -- ---~ ~1736 1n1 _-- zo1s-2o:ls ~3973 ...._____2s9e..-- 3688 3417 4as 1 s22s ---- / --..--2165- 2645 2667_2927- 2796 5609 3747 '--4 991 4614 4270 ~ / - --------- - - . vw / \ / '-------------- '-.------" \
18 14 2655--- 3215 3492 4025 3605 /6744 4608 (Q 5370 5077 3~88 3::!.140 ) / /' ..--- - I IIJ~'I \__ \ - -
2304 _-- 3125 4215 4524 ----5458-- 474(--/ 8961 ~6474 __ 7602 76 1 3~~6639 . 4674 158 4 1347 . ----- - ..--- ------- r ~ / / ___ ./ 3902 4830 5467 6518 5868 11622' 8213 9433 9064 18147 5339 1 7 18----'IM!~IIIIIIIIII!
4+00 s 2+00 s 6.65 6 .25 4.22 2 .39 10.2 10.2 3 .99 7.94 6 .49 4.37 3.51 3.23
4+00 s 2+00 s 3000 1590 1100 1010 11 80 1150 1010 1320 1840 1640 1250 91 7
- ---- -- -- --- --- ·- ---- -
0+00 N
2.72 2.43 2.17 2.1 7 2.17 2.68 3.28
0+00 N 960 1070 1230 1290 1280 1220 1150
1714
--------
2+00 N
3.84 2.27 2.26 2.49 2.24 204
2 +00 N 1240 1350 1390 2020 1650 2010
2.33 1.58
3320 3770
Resistivity Average IP Ohm' m mVN
5500 11
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0.71 Frller
n~2
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
2830 Filler
10
8
6
4
2
0
Average IP mVN
201 5 2727 "- 7376 9914
I - ~"---,------n=2 Resistivity
6/ 27,82 -----)186(\-1676~5169
/)937----- 2086 ~65 1701 ( 1'65
__..-- 2160 2316 1848 ~23 1 3 ~ w!e ..--..--- I L
1_?25 -- 2226 2369 2 129 \ 1839 ~2238
2048 2442 2408 2270 2074 1-7s'i
n=3
n=4
n=6
n=7
Ohm•m
Pseudo Section Plot 10+00 E
Pant-leg Filter
* * * * * *
* *
Dipole-Pole Array
a na
' / ' / ' /
'"' plot point
a
a =25m
Logarithmic Contours
1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, ...
Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150
(meten;)
PRODIGY GOLD INC INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
PAGWACHUAN GRID 2
LONGLAC,ON Date: 09/11/2011 Interpretation:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD
Average IP Resistivity mVN Ohm'm
14 2200
12
10
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
-----~------
6 1000
____ / 4 800
600 2
400
Average IP mVN
Resistivity Ohm*m
200
2+00 s Filter 9.18
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
2+00 s Filter 358
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
8.61 7.61 12.2
402 372 755
1+00 s 8.69
1+00 s 2180
4 08
1820
2.1
834
2.45
748
0+00 N 2.43
0+00 N 850
2.16 1.92
965 1290
1.31
1410
1+00 N 0.91
1+00 N 1120
Resistivity Average IP Ohm*m mVN
2200 14
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
12
10
4
1.27 1.75 1.84
2+00 N 1.51 1.47 1.56 1.46
3+00 N 1.33 1.28 1.03 0.875 Filter
1 ~ n=2 Average IP mVN
n=3
n=4
1\ n=5
0 n=6
2 n=7
2+00 N 3+00 N 867 882 977 1150 1760 1340 1290 1400 2060 1650 1950 Filter
n=2 Resistivity Ohm*m
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
801~1034 -925_895
% 861 972~~00~9------1591-1380 ---- /,~\ -717 1005 1144 1316 ~~) 1705 1839-------2119
~ / / \\0~0 ~ ( 780 825 1039 1265 1429 1797"--./2081 2161 2304
\ 902 ~74-1~ 1356 /1~ 185~) 2214 2587 2647
1110 1237 1§§9 1843 2235 2606 3027 n=7
Pseudo Section Plot 9+00 E
Pant-leg Filter
* * * * * *
* *
Dipole-Pole Array
a na
' / ' / ' / ' /
"' plot point
a
/
a =25m
Logarithmic Contours
1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, ...
Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150
(meters)
PRODIGY GOLD INC INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
PAGWACHUAN GRID 2
LONGLAC,ON Date: 01/09/2011 Interpretation:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD
Average IP Resistivity mVN Ohm*m
5.5 1700
5 1600
4.5
4 1400
3.5
3 1200
2.5
2 1000
1.5
800 ---------------0.5 700
1+00 s 0+00 N 1+00 N 2+00 N 3+00 N Filter 5.18 3.63 2.44 2.17 2.11 2.21 2.21 1.99 1.77 1.64 1.67 1.42 1.42 1.25 1.18 1.07 0.939 0.82 0.722 0.714 0.75
Average IP n=2
mVN n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
1+00 s 0+00 N 1+00 N 2+00 N 3+00 N Filter 769 852 1020 1100 1140 1080 1020 1010 1320 1060 1120 1250 1610 1430 1340 1280 1210 1280 1320 1400 1620
Resistivity n=2
Ohm*m n=3
n=4 1480 1552-1421 1305 1297 1230
n=5 I ~.
1371 1866 1879 1807 1819 1476-1565
n=6 1275 I 1684 ~ 2476 2523 ~68 ----1824
n=7 121 7 1265 1492 1916 2674 ~ 2799 2432
Resistivity Average IP Ohm*m mVN
1700 5.5
1600
4.5
1400 4
3.5
1200
2.5
1000 2
1.5
800
700 0.5
0.752 Filter
n=2 Average IP mVN
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
1520 Filter
n=2 Resistivity Ohm*m
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
Pseudo Section Plot 8+00 E
Pant-leg Filter
* * * * * * * *
Dipole-Pole Array
a na
/
/ /
'"' plot point
a
/ /
a =25m
Logarithmic Contours 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, ...
Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150
(meters)
PRODIGY GOLD INC INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
PAGWACHUAN GRID 2
LONGLAC,ON Date: 01/09/2011 Interpretation:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD
Average IP Resistivity mVN Ohm•m
3.5 2200
2000
2.5 1800
2 1600
1.5 1400
1200
0.5 1000
800
-0.5 600
-1 400
1+00 s 0+50 s 0+00 N 0+50 N 1+00 N 1+50 N 2+00 N 2+50 N 3+00 N 3+50 N Filter 3.35 3.04 2.81 2.29 2.01 1.95 1.8 1.35 0.694 0.211 -0.124 -0.254 -0.289 -0.0742 -0.0899 0.371 0.14 0.268 -0.873 0.729
Average IP n=2
mVN n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
1+00 s 0+50 s 0+00 N 0+50 N 1+00 N 1+50 N 2+00 N 2+50 N 3+00 N 3+50 N
Filter 556 587 757 1520 2090 1590 892 1150 1230 1460 1580 1510 1100 1020 1130 1080 1020 996 925 1130
Resistivity n=2 Ohm•m
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
Resistivity Average IP Ohm•m mVN
2200 3.5
2000
1800 2.5
1600 2
1400 1.5
1200
1000 0.5
800
600 -0.5
400 -1
0.87 Filter
n=2 Average IP mVN
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
1200 Filter
n=2 Resistivity Or1m•m
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
Pseudo Section Plot 7+00 E
Pant-leg Filter
* * * * * *
* *
Dipole-Pole Array
a
'
na
' /
' / /
" plot point
a
/ /
a =25m
Logarithmic Contours
1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, ...
Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150
(meters)
PRODIGY GOLD INC INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
PAGWACHUAN GRID 2
LONGLAC,ON Date: 01/09/2011 Interpretation:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD
Average IP Resistivity mVN Ohm'm
3.5 1500
1400
2.5 1200
2 1000
1.5 800
600 0.5
400
2+00 s Filter 3.45
Average IP n=2 mVN
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
2+00 s Filter 488
Resistivity n=2 Ohm*m
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
3.15 2.82
519 557
2.51
652
1+00 s 1.97
1+00 s 812
1.47
882
1+00 N 2+00 N 1.77 1.61
0+00 N 1.5 1.29 0.819 0.318 0.414 0.514 0.131 0.29 0.27 0.452 0.426 0.426
3+00 N 0.48 0.569 0.485
0+00 N 1+00 N 2+00 N 3+00 N 871 1120 1220 1400 1420 1360 1260 1250 1320 1250 1290 1320 1040 1030 938 922 917
963......--Ti03~ / 1 040-957--1i'li2-1045-1013~
( 1156 1158 981 1233 1177 1394.----1614---1405 1152 986
953 1220 1265 1061 1469~150~ 1939-1945---~1390 ~979-1~1027-1 9 082
~99 1216 1362 1286 ( 1719/200: 2516 2490~-----~1511~~~1363 9--853- - 1007 1298 1510- 1478 2282 2472 3043- 2886 2632 2215 2127 ~ 1895 1608 1772 3549
Resistivity Average IP Ohm'm mVN
1500 3.5
1400
1200 2.5
1000
1.5 800
600 0.5
400
0.53 Filter
n=2 Average IP mVN
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
1040 Filter
n=2 Resistivity Ohm*m
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
Pseudo Section Plot 6+00 E
Pant-leg Filter
* * * * * *
* *
Dipole-Pole Array
a na
' / ' / ' / ' /
"' plot point
a
/
a =25m
Logarithmic Contours
1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, ...
Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150
(meters)
PRODIGY GOLD INC INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
PAGWACHUAN GRID 2
LONGLAC,ON Date: 01/09/2011 Interpretation:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD
Average IP Resistivity mVN Ohm'm
1600
1400
1200
4 1000
800
600
400
~--~-~------------------------- ---
-1
2+00 s 1+00 s 0+00 N 1+00 N 2+00 N Filter 6.12 5.39 4.24 3.8 3.53 3.19 2.93 1.97 1.45 0.614 0.281 0.0215 0.0882 0.169 0.322 0.479 0.653 0.289 0.295 0.295 0.224 0.34
Average IP n=2
mVN n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
2+00 s 1+00 s 0+00 N 1+00 N 2+00 N Filter 185 237 280 331 366 412 464 562 636 716 707 771 824 973 1120 1220 1350 1480 1200 1170 1180 1220
Resistivity n=2
Ohm'm n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
Resistivity Average IP Ohm'm mVN
1600
1400
1200
1000 4
800
600
400
---------------.......__ 200
-1
3+00 N 0.31 -0.0264 0.223 0.252 -0.284 Filter
n=2 Average IP mVN
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
3+00 N 1200 1350 1280 1160 1390 Filter
747 n=2 Resistivity Ohm*m
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
Pseudo Section Plot 5+00 E
Pant-leg Filter
* * * * * * * *
Dipole-Pole Array
a na
/
/
' / ' / ' /
"' plot point
a
a =25m
Logarithmic Contours
1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, ...
Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150
(meters)
PRODIGY GOLD INC INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
PAGWACHUAN GRID 2 LONGLAC,ON Date: 01/09/2011 Interpretation:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD
Average IP Resistivity mVN Ohm'm
2400
4
2000
1500 ~····· ... _
-1
Average IP mVN
Resistivity Ohm'm
1000
500
200
Filter 6.7
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
Filter 325
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
-------
2+00 s 4.83 3.41 3.07
2+00 s 308 346 327 368
-----------
2.57 2.23
398 440
Resistivity Average IP Ohm'm mVN
2400
2000
1500 4
~-~---------------------~-------------------~-~--------------
1000
500
200 -1
1+00 s 0+00 N 1+00 N 2+00 N 3+00 N 1.13 0.284 -0.0263 -0.344 -0.563 -0.57 -0.662 -0.626 -0.414 0.0306 0.167 0.158 0.19 0.195 0.459 0.483 0.915 0.327 0.153 0.474 Filter
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
1+00 s 0+00 N 1+00 N 2+00 N 3+00 N 573 566 571 573 615 706 901 952 1060 1330 1400 1320 1200 1120 1170 1300 1780 2230 1730 1620 Filter
9_6?4 0 4? \ 1962 ,3468 2841
(836 1037-~8-----737 ~ 856~ ~ \4059
689 985L_1032~ /23-1464-1496~977 954 742 ~~6 651 720~783-------723 717~ 839 /1059 1193/2 /31-2104~1921 1680~ ~ 790
733~ 873 954-938 :;;;------- 820 983 1420_.--------1581 1818 2653 2889 ~1725~089 1007
---------- --- ~ I / / / ----------._ ~ 846 943 10§9 1089 1179 112§ 974 966 1151 1785 1957 2425 3336 3552 "'2689 1904 1286
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
Average IP mVN
Resistivity Ohm*m
Pseudo Section Plot 4+00 E
Pant-leg Filter
* * * * * * * *
Dipole-Pole Array
a na
/
/
' / ' / ' /
"' plot point
a
a =25m
Logarithmic Contours
1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, ...
Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150
(meters)
PRODIGY GOLD INC INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
PAGWACHUAN GRID 2 LONGLAC,ON Date: 01/09/2011 Interpretation:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD
Average IP Resistivity mVN Ohm'm
4
-1
Average IP mVN
Resistivity Ohm'm
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
Filter 5.73
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
Filter 274
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
4.48
310
2+00 s 1+00 s 3.9 3.5 3.2 2.66 1.84 1.05
2+00 s 1+00 s 462 386 473 688 570 588
919
0+00 N 1+00 N 2+00 N 3+00 N 0.217 -0.316 -0.706 -1.12 -1.09 -1.19 -0.996 -0.759 -0.775 -0.622 -0.438 -0.0346 0.241 0.0757 0.578 -0.503 0.291 0.0294
0+00 N 1+00 N 2+00 N 3+00 N 618 928 690 758 861 907 951 997 1050 1160 1140 1170 1100 1160 1660 4630 4210 2500
Resistivity Average IP Ohm'm mVN
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
1.4 Filter
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
4800 Filter
4
-1
-2
Average IP mVN
868 \1311\\ \51 /9700 ..:::::::~308
---- 977-1004 1161 845 87 1 ) 1863"\11206 16352
n=2 Resistivity Ohm*m
n=3
~996~ 1427~1505 1108 926 1142 \ \'098~16185 / ---- / \ ) ~~·
n=4
851 855 832 830 767 918__,......-1055 1168 1160 ~ 1527 1959 1296 1134 1133 1" 53-= 34
925~1000-1031-964--949/ 1147 1331 1462-1525 1686 2000 1744 "----1473-1511-1543 ~ / / ~ I
1264 1365 1320 1285 1279 1133 1379 1474 1756 1929 2134 I 1638 1917 1808 1973 1-
n=5
n=6
n=7
Pseudo Section Plot 3+00 E
Pant-leg Filter
* * * * * * * *
Dipole-Pole Array a na
/
/
' / ' / ' /
"' plot point
a
a =25m
Logarithmic Contours 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, ...
Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150
(meters)
PRODIGY GOLD INC INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
PAGWACHUAN GRID 2 LONGLAC,ON Date: 01/09/2011 Interpretation:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD
Average IP Resistivity mVN Ohm*m
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
4 1000
800
600
400
3+00 s
Average IP mVN
Resistivity Ohm*m
Filter
n=1
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
Filter
n=1
e
3+00 s
7.21
529
n=2
n=3
n=4 ~ n=5 1368
n=6
n=7
2+00 s 7.51 7.79 8.07 8.12 7.71 7.16
2+00 s 574 743 778 830 1120 979
2205
1+00 s 0+00 N 1+00 N 6.33 5.7 4.97 4.35 4.05 3.46 2.8 3.09 2.88 2.47 2.23
1+00 s 0+00 N 1+00 N 918 996 1140 1150 1240 1690 1090 1050 1170 1250 1370 1670
/ 1643 1894 2817
2+00 N 3+00 N 2.43 2.23 2.68 2.21 2
2+00 N 3+00 N 1420 1120 1010 1420 1900
-3192
1.93
1990
Resistivity Average IP
2.01
1350
Ohm*m mVN 2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000 4
800
600
400
Filter
n=1
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
Filter
n=1
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
Average IP mVN
Resistivity Ohm*m
Pseudo Section Plot 2+00 E
Pant-leg Filter
* * * * * * * *
Pole-Dipole Array a na a
/
/ / ,.,
plot point a=25 m
Logarithmic Contours
1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, ...
Scale 1 :2500 25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150
(meters)
PRODIGY GOLD INC INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
PAGWACHUAN GRID 2 LONGLAC,ON Date: 01/09/2011 Interpretation:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD
Average IP mVN
10
8
6
4
2
0
-1
Average IP mVN
Resistivity 011 m*m
Resistivity Ohm•m
70000
60000
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000 ------------0
2+00 N Filter -0.0802 0.175 -0.137 -0.077 0.0612 0.0306 0.161 0. 765 1.24
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
2+00 N Filter 1300 915 944 1220 1470 1520 1850 1730 1820
n=2
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n= ?
1.37 1.92 2.1 8 1.93
2000 2760 266 0 3990
Resistivity Average IP Ohm*m mVN
70000 - 10
60000 - 8
50000
- 6 40000
- ------- ----------------- -30000 - 4
- - -------------------.... ..... ____________ __ 200 00 - 2
10000 - 0
-1
4+00 N 6+00 N 8+00 N 10+00 N 2.18 2.75 2.96 3.6 1 3.04 2 .92 2 .86 3 .2 2 .98 3.16 3.47 3.87 4.4 5.86 6.15 5.78 7.26 8.25 7 .16 7.6 7.91 8.07 7.25 9 .1 6 7. 75 6 .52 5.99 6.81 6.94 6.69 F1lter
n=2 Average IP mVN
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
3 3 4 n=7
4+00 N 6+00 N 8+00 N 10+00 N 10800 7130 141 00 19600 19000 12700 13300 20000 16300 151 DO 21100 15200 19600 20100 54800 50400 29500 49600 51100 42800 60800 55500 63600 47800 51300 56600 58700 42300 62600 67300 55300 Filter
n=2 Resistivity Ohm*m
n=3
n=4
n=5
n=6
n=7
Pseudo Section Plot 1+00 E
Dipole-Pole Array a na a
Pant-leg r>l ~ Filter "* * *
* * * *
Logarithmic Contours
25 0 25
' /
' /
' ':<! /
/
a = 25 m plot point
1' 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, .. .
Scale 1 :2500 50 75 100 125 150
(mete rs)
PRODIGY GOLD INC INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
PAGWACHUAN GRID 2 LONGLAC, ON Date: 01/09/2011 Interpretation:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD
TOTAL MAGNETIC FIELD
555200E 555300E 555400E 555500E 555600E 555700E 555800E 555900E 556000E 556100E 556200E 556300E 556400E
4215743
5510400N
5510300N -
5510200N
5510100N -
v, 'y
v, ~ ~
0
" ,.
5510000N
5509900N
5509800N
5509700N -
5509600N
5509500N -
5509400N
5509300N -
I I I I
555200E 555300E 555400E 555500E 555600E 555800E 555900E 556000E 556100E 556200E 556300E 556400E
556500E 556600E
I
556500E 556600E
5510400N
- 5510300N
5510200N
- 5510100N
5510000N
5509900N
5509800N
- 5509700N
5509600N
- 55.li9500N .z5u
5509400N
- 5509300N
-rJ-
59919. 59729. 59546. 59399. 59271.
59178. 59073. 58975.
58884. 58815. 58733. 58653. 58577.
58517. 58445. 58372. 58302. 58247. 58178. 58109.
58040. 57970. 57915.
57845. 57773. 57700.
57641.
57485. 57403.
57333. 57242. 57145. 56947.
56818. 56671. 56489. 56299. 55961.
TOTAL MAGNETIC FIELD (nT)
Scale 1:2500 50 100
(metres)
PRODIGY GOLD INC PAGWACHUAN LAKE -GRID 2
LONGLAC,ON
GROUND MAGNETIC SURVEY TOTAL FIELD CONTOUR PLAN MAP
(Diurnal and Loop Corrected)
Magnetic Datum:
Magnetic Inclination:
Magnetic Declination:
Diurnal Correction:
Station Interval:
Grlddlng Method:
Grid Cell Size:
Contour Interval:
Colour Zoning:
Survey Date:
Instrumentation:
Operator:
58,800 nT
Base Station (8 secfcyc)
25 metres
Random
5.0m
100, 500, 2000 nT
Equal Area f Colour.tbl
August 2011
GEM GSM-19
RG
Surveyed & Processed by:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD.
DWG. NO. P236-MAGCONT-PAGWACHUAN GRID 2
5510400N-
5510000N
.... 0 0 555200E 555400E
5509200N ------~------------------------------t-----------~
555200E 555400E
555600E
555600E
TOTAL CHARGEABILITY (mVN)
555800E 556000E 556200E 556400E 556600E - 5510400N
5509400N
555800E 556000E 556200E 556400E 556600E
25 0 25
9.3
8.7
8.1
7.6
7.2
6.9
6.6
6.3
6.0
5.8
5.5
5.3
5.0
4.8
4.6
4.4
4.1
4.0
3.8
3.5
3.3
3.1
2.9
2.7
2.5
2.2
2.0
1.8
1.5 1.3
1.1
0.8
0.5
-0.2
-0.6
-1.0
-1.6
-2.2
-3.3
Chargeability (mV/V)
Scale 1 :2500 50 75 100 125 150
(metres)
PRODIGY GOLD INC
PAGWACHUAN LAKE -GRID 2 LONGLAC, ON
TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY
Pole-Dipole Array
TOTAL CHARGEABILITY
Transmitter Frequency
Transmitter Current
Decay Curve:
Station Interval:
Data from N=6
0.0625 Hz (50% duty cycle)
0.8 to 1.2 Amps
lP-G Custom Semilogarithmic Windows
10 Gates
Chargeability Contour Interval:
25 meters
0.5, 2.5 mV/V
Equal Area Zoning Colour Scale:
Survey Date:
Instrumentation:
August, 2011
Rx =IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)
Tx = WALCER TX 9000 (9.0 kW) + MG-12 (12 kVA)
Surveyed & Processed by:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD.
DWG. #: P236-PLAN-CHG-1
5510400N-
.... 0 0 555200E
1- - -t-- ,, 0 0 0 J
555200E
555400E 555600E
I
555400E 555600E
APPARENT RESISTIVITY (ohm-metres)
555800E 556000E 556200E 556400E 556600E - 5510400N
~---+------------------------------~----------------------------~~-----------------------------r----sso9200N
555800E 556000E 556200E 556400E 556600E
25 0 25
11958.
9005.
7223.
6135.
5199.
4474.
3892.
3467.
3052.
2699.
2431.
2155.
1911.
1720.
1522.
1340.
1193.
1038.
893.
757.
643.
516.
388.
267.
Resistivity (ohm-m)
Scale 1 :2500 50 75 100 125 150
(metres)
PRODIGY GOLD INC
PAGWACHUAN LAKE -GRID 2 LONGLAC, ON
TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY
Pole-Dipole Array
APPARENT RESISTIVITY
Transmitter Frequency
Transmitter Current
Decay Curve:
Station Interval:
Data from N=6
0.0625 Hz (50% duty cycle)
0.8 to 1.2 Amps
lP-G Custom Semilogarithmic Windows
10 Gates
Resistivity Contour Interval:
25 meters
10 levels/log decade
Equal Area Zoning Colour Scale:
Survey Date:
Instrumentation:
August, 2011
Rx =IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)
Tx = WALCER TX 9000 (9.0 kW) + MG-12 (12 kVA)
Surveyed & Processed by:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD.
DWG. #: P236-PLAN-RES-1