Download - Me 414 He Presentation
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
1/26
Heat Exchanger Design
ME 414 Design Project
Created and Designed by:Michael Stark
Joshua Keith
Billy Burdette
Brandon Mullen
Joseph Listerman
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
2/26
Project Goalsy Design Heat Exchanger
y Create a light weight heat exchanger
y Heat exchange must be as efficient as possible
y Cost must be kept low as possible
y The size of the heat exchanger must be under design constraint
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
3/26
Project Guidelinesy During the process of a liquid chemical product, its temperature needs
to be reduced by 20 degrees Celsius.y Mass flow rate is 220,000 kg/hr
y Fluid enters the heat exchanger at 45 C and should leave at 25 Cy Material properties of this chemical product can be approximated as water
y Cooling of the chemical product will be achieved by using treated citywatery City water is available at 20 C
y Mass flow rate is adjustable and one of the design parameters to be selected
y Exit temperature of city water from the heat exchanger is a function of the selected massflow rate
Professor Toksoy
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
4/26
Project Optimizationy Must cool the chemical from 45 C to 25 C
y Heat exchanger length can not exceed 7 meters
y
Heat exchanger shell diameter can not exceed 2 metersy Minimize heat exchanger shell and tube weight hence the cost
y Minimize heat exchanger pressure drop
Professor Toksoy
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
5/26
Heat Exchanger Design Inputs
for MATLAB Chemical to be cooled was set as Shell side liquid Mass flow rate of cooling water = 220 kg/sec Shell ID = .889 m Shell thickness = 5 mm Tube OD = 6.35 mm Tube thickness = .457 mm Tube Length = 2.88 m Baffle space = .6 m Helical Baffles Counter flow One shell pass and one tube pass Aluminum was used for both shell and tube materials Gnielinski equation used for tube side Nusselt correlation Square tube pitch
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
6/26
Heat Exchanger Design Inputs for
MATLAB Explained
Chemical to be cooled was set as shell side liquid In order to keepshell side pressure drop to a minimum we needed to keep the massflow rate in the shell low. The only way we found of doing this andgetting the desired Q was to push the chemical to be cooled through
the shell. Mass flow rate of cooling water = 220 kg/sec - For these inputs this
calculates out to an average tube side fluid velocity of ~1 m/s whichfalls within the recommended range of .9 2.4 m/s.
Tube OD = 6.35 mm - The small OD was needed to increase the
surface area for heat transfer for a given shell ID. Tube thickness = .457 mm -The small tube thickness was needed to
increase the heat transfer coefficient and also reduced the totalmaterial weight and cost.
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
7/26
Tube Length = 2.88 m - The tube length was increased to increase thecalculated Q.
Baffle space = .6 m - Although slightly larger then the recommended valueof 40-60% of shell ID, .6 m worked well.
Helical Baffles A helical baffle will increase the heat transfer coefficientconsiderably without dramatically increasing pressure drop due to the natureof the flows.
Counter flow - Because of the narrow band of temperatures between thetwo fluids, a counter flow arrangement was used in order to increase the logmean temperature difference between the two fluids without having toincrease the mass flow rate of the water to very high levels.
Heat Exchanger Design Inputs for
MATLAB Explained Cont.
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
8/26
One shell pass and one tube pass - One pass was used for both the shell andtube because currently the program does not calculate pressure drop due tomultiple passes correctly. We discovered this late into the project and didnot have time to fix the issue. If the pressures were calculated properly thewater output temperature for one shell pass and two tube passes must stay
below 28.33 deg C in order to keep the log mean temperature differencecorrection factor valid for the given temperature requirements.
Aluminum was used for both shell and tube materials - Aluminum waschosen for its excellent heat transfer properties and its reduced weight.
Gnielinskis equation used for tube side Nusselt correlation For thecalculated Reynolds number of 5800 this correlation is most applicable.Petuhkov Krillovs correlation is used for Reynolds number larger then104.
Heat Exchanger Design Inputs for
MATLAB Explained Cont.
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
9/26
Nusselt Correlation
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
10/26
D.O.E. Run 1
240200
1600000
1400000
1200000
1000000
800000
42
1.50.5
1600000
1400000
1200000
1000000
800000
mdot Shell
Mean
Tube Length
Shell
Main Effects Plot for q_CalcData Means
240200
120000
100000
80000
42
1.50.5
120000
100000
80000
mdot Shell
Mean
Tube Length
Shell
Main Effects Plot for DP_TubeData Means
240200
80000
60000
40000
20000
42
1.50.5
80000
60000
40000
20000
mdot Shell
Mean
Tube Length
Shell
Main Effects Plot for DP_ShellData Means
240200
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
42
1.50.5
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
mdot Shell
Mean
Tube Length
Shell
Main Effects Plot for WeightData Means
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
11/26
D.O.E. Run 1y Factors
y Shell mass flow rate
y Tube length
y Shell internal diameter
y The most significant affect on heat transfer was tube length, aresult of increased surface area.
y Shell I.D. and tube length had the greatest affect on weight, thelarger the shell the more tubes can fit inside.
y Shell side pressure drop increases with tube length and mass flowrate. Dramatic decrease as shell ID increases.
y The only factor affecting the tube side pressure drop was tubelength.
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
12/26
D.O.E. Run 2
0.80.3
5600000
5400000
5200000
5000000
4800000
0.0007110.000457
0.50.1
5600000
5400000
5200000
5000000
4800000
Baffles Space
Mean
Tube Th
Baffle Cut
Main Effects Plot for q_CalcData Means
0.80.3
20000
18000
16000
14000
12000
0.0007110.000457
0.50.1
20000
18000
16000
14000
12000
Baffles Space
Mean
Tube Th
Baffle Cut
Main Effects Plot for DP_TubeData Means
0.80.3
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0.0007110.000457
0.50.1
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
Baffles Space
Mean
Tube Th
Baffle Cut
Main Effects Plot for DP_ShellData Means
0.80.3
2500
2450
2400
2350
2300
0.0007110.000457
0.50.1
2500
2450
2400
2350
2300
Baffles Space
M
ean
Tube Th
Baffle Cut
Main Effects Plot for WeightData Means
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
13/26
D.O.E. Run 2y Factors
y Baffle Space
y Tube Thickness
y Baffle Cut
y Baffle spacing has a large affect on q and shell side pressure drop.
y Tube thickness was the only factor affect HE weight in this DOE.
y Baffle cut doesnt seem to have any affect on other parameters.
y We fixed baffle spacing because it heavily influenced shell sidepressure drop.
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
14/26
Final D.O.E.
42
8000000
7000000
6000000
5000000
4000000
1.5000.889
0.012700.00635
8000000
7000000
6000000
5000000
4000000
Tube Length
Mean
Shell ID
Tube OD
Main Effects Plot for q_CalcData Means
42
12000
9000
6000
3000
0
1.5000.889
0.012700.00635
12000
9000
6000
3000
0
Tube Length
Mean
Shell ID
Tub e OD
Main Effects Plot for DP_TubeData Means
42
20001750
1500
1250
1000
1.5000.889
0.012700.00635
2000
1750
1500
1250
1000
Tube Length
Mean
Shell ID
Tube OD
Main Effects Plot for DP_ShellData Means
42
6000
5000
4000
3000
1.5000.889
0.012700.00635
6000
5000
4000
3000
Tube Length
Mean
Shell ID
Tube OD
Main Effects Plot for WeightData Means
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
15/26
Final D.O.E.
y Final optimization factorsy Mass flow rate of the shell fluid fixed to 220 kg/s
y Tube length
y Shell internal diameter
y Tube outer diameter
y We adjusted the ranges of our chosen factors and ran the DOEagain.
y The mass flow rate only affected the shell side pressure drop atthis stage of the design. We chose the shell side mass flow ratebased on what we decided would yield reasonable shell outlettemperature using counter flow.
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
16/26
Factorial Design Analysis Heat Rate
y Tube length has the largestaffect on the heat rate.
y Shell ID has the smallestrelative affect on heat rate.
y Shell ID had a negative affecton heat rate.y This was a result of more
tubes decreasing the
velocity in the tube.y The result is laminar flow
inside the tube.
BC
AB
B
AC
C
A
4003002001000
Term
Standardized Effect
12.7
A Tube Length
B Shell ID
C Tube OD
Factor Name
Pareto Chart of the Standardized Effects
(response is q_Calc, Alpha = 0.05)
4003002001000
99
9590
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
5
1
Standardized Effect
Percent
A Tube Length
B Shell ID
C Tube OD
Factor Name
Not Significant
Significant
EffectType
AC
AB
C
B
A
Normal Plot of the Standardized Effects
(response is q_Calc, Alpha = 0.05)
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
17/26
Factorial Design Analysis - P Tubey We can see that tube length has the largest affect on tube side pressure
drop.
y Shell ID has no affect on tube pressure drop.
y We expected tube OD to have a larger affect on tube side pressure drop.
AB
BC
B
AC
A
C
14000120001000080006000400020000
Term
Effect
A Tube Length
B S hell ID
C Tube O D
Factor Name
Pareto Chart of the Effects(response is DP_Tube, Alpha = 0.05)
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
18/26
Factorial Design Analysis - P Shelly Shell ID had the largest
affect on shell sidepressure drop.
y
The affect of tube OD onthe pressure drop wassurprising.y We attribute this affect to
the 60 triangular pitchtube arrangement.
y As tube OD grows largerthere is more pressuredrop in the shell.
AC
AB
BC
A
C
B
14121086420
Term
Standardized Effect
12.71
A Tube Length
B S hell ID
C Tube O D
Factor Name
Pareto Chart of the Standardized Effects(response is DP_Shell, Alpha = 0.05)
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
19/26
Factorial Design Analysis HE Weight
y The shell insidediameter has the largestaffect on weight.y The larger the shell
diameter the moretubes we could fitinside, thus increasingweight.
y Because tube length
determines the lengthof the heat exchanger, ittoo has a large affect onheat exchanger weight.
BC
AC
C
AB
A
B
40003000200010000
Term
Effect
A Tube Length
B Shell ID
C Tube O D
Facto r N ame
Pareto Chart of the Effects
(response is Weight, Alpha = 0.05)
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
20/26
Design Optimization - 1
y The design optimized to our originaldesign.
yWe expected our final tube diameter to
be 6.35 mm with a mass flow rate of 220kg/s.
y Optimal Tube OD was 8.3mm
y The tube length was longer than ouroriginal design called for, which was aresult of maximizing the q calculated.
y We set target values for the shell andtube side pressure drops.
y We set a target range for total weightbetween 900-1100 kg.
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
21/26
Design Optimization - 2
CurHigh
Low1.0000D
New
d = 1.0000
MinimumWeight
y = 2288.8141
d = 1.0000
MinimumDP_Shell
y = 1805.0741
d = 1.0000
MinimumDP_Tube
y = 5865.8838
d = 1.0000
Maximumq_Calc
y = 5.454E+06
1.0000
Desirability
Composite
0.0063
0.0127
0.8890
1.50
2.0
4.0Shell ID Tube ODTube Len
[2.6263] [0.8890] [0.0096]
y The design optimized to our original design.
y We expected our final tube diameter to be6.35 mm with a mass flow rate of 220 kg/s.
y Optimal Tube OD was 8.3mm, adjusted itto 9.525 mm to coincide with standardtube dimensions.
y The tube length was longer than our originaldesign called for, which was a result ofmaximizing the q calculated.
y
We set target values for the shell and tube sidepressure drops.
y We set a target range for total weight between900-1100 kg.
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
22/26
Heat Exchanger Design Output from
MATLAB
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
23/26
Heat Exchanger Final Design
y Tube side mass flow rate of 220 kg/sec
y Tube OD set to 9.525 mm, thickness 0.889 mm
y Shell ID set to .889 meters, thickness 5 mm
y Heat exchanger is a one pass counter flow tube arrangementwith helical baffles and optimized tube length of 2.6 m.
y The ratio between desired and calculated heat rate is 1.00.
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
24/26
Further Analysis
y We believe that cost could be decreased by over-designingthe HE and reducing the number of tubes until we got thedesired heat ratio.
y
The tube mass flow rate was an important designconsideration because the outlet temperature of the shellfluid was completely dependent on it.
y After performing a macroscopic heat balance, counter flowwas chosen because the cold fluid outlet temp was expectedto be higher than the hot fluid outlet temp.
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
25/26
Matlab Program Improvements
y Create program checks in order to eliminate unrealisticdesigns.
y If multiple tube passes are used with parallel flow it is possibleto calculate a LMTD_CF that is an imaginary number.
y Provide the operator more detailed information regardingthe Nusselt correlations.
-
8/3/2019 Me 414 He Presentation
26/26
Cost Summary
y Heat Exchanger Dry Weighty 730 Kg
y Heat Exchanger & Fluid Weight
y 2287 Kg
y Costy OnlineMetals.com
y $37.00 per 8ft length of aluminum tubing
y Total estimated aluminum tubing cost $337,000.00
y
$11.00 per 8ft length of mild steel tubingy Total estimated mild steel tubing cost $100,000.00
y Instillation and Manufacturing