![Page 1: MBA Cultural Policy Comparison - USA, Japan and Canada](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070321/558c69f6d8b42ae7508b4737/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
PUBLIC POLICY PRESENTATION
CULTURAL POLICY AND CULTURAL COMPLEXES
HIROYASU SUDO MARCH 2012
![Page 2: MBA Cultural Policy Comparison - USA, Japan and Canada](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070321/558c69f6d8b42ae7508b4737/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
TODAY’S NEWS
![Page 3: MBA Cultural Policy Comparison - USA, Japan and Canada](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070321/558c69f6d8b42ae7508b4737/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
AGENDA• Issue: Arts Funding
• Countries: Canada, the US, Japan
• Situations in each country
• Cultural complex in each country
• Suggestion
![Page 4: MBA Cultural Policy Comparison - USA, Japan and Canada](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070321/558c69f6d8b42ae7508b4737/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ISSUE: ARTS FUNDING• Arts Funding – Public or Private
• Why? – Public Goods, Philanthropy, Diplomacy…
• Trend – Decreasing (i.e. Global Competition, The Crisis)
• ‘Creative Class’ theory -- Instrumentalism
![Page 5: MBA Cultural Policy Comparison - USA, Japan and Canada](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070321/558c69f6d8b42ae7508b4737/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
CANADA• Objective: National Pride/ Social Cohesion/ Diversity
• History: Formed after WWII, American Influence
• Type: Public Funding is larger
• Culture: Individualistic, slightly socialistic
• Trend: Decreasing, yet the scope is broadening
![Page 6: MBA Cultural Policy Comparison - USA, Japan and Canada](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070321/558c69f6d8b42ae7508b4737/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
THE UNITED STATES• Objective: Public Goods, Diplomacy
• History: In line with active philanthropy (Carnegie)
• Type: Private Funding is substantially larger
• Culture: Individualistic, Capitalistic (Democratic)
• Trend: Recovering from the Crisis
![Page 7: MBA Cultural Policy Comparison - USA, Japan and Canada](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070321/558c69f6d8b42ae7508b4737/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
JAPAN• Objective: Public Goods, Preservation, Economic Growth
• History: Westernization = Modernization, WWII
• Type: Public Funding is marginal (fear of public intervention)
• Culture: Collectivist, Capitalistic
• Trend: Recovering from the Crisis, Collaboration with Private
![Page 8: MBA Cultural Policy Comparison - USA, Japan and Canada](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070321/558c69f6d8b42ae7508b4737/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
COMPARISON
• Punctuation Equilibrium: External Influence
• Advocacy Coalition: Linear
• Path Dependency: Disconnected Evolution
• Policy tools: Direct, Indirect, Hybrid
Canada USA Japan
ObjectiveNational Pride/Social Cohesion
Economic DevelopmentPublic goods
DiplomacyPreservation
Economic Development
Policy Change PEF ACF PDF
Public/Private 27:23 13:43 6:12.2
ratio 117% 30% 49%
Culture Individualist - Socialistic Individualist - Capitalistic Collectivist - Capitalistic
![Page 9: MBA Cultural Policy Comparison - USA, Japan and Canada](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070321/558c69f6d8b42ae7508b4737/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
CULTURE COMPLEX• Cultural Hub
• Encourage arts/culture
• Provide facilities (Theatre, Gallery, etc.)
![Page 10: MBA Cultural Policy Comparison - USA, Japan and Canada](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070321/558c69f6d8b42ae7508b4737/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
HARBOURFRONT CENTRE• Non-profit (established as a
crown company)
• Artistic Innovation, Cultural Engagement
• 4 Theatres, 2 Galleries
• Decreasing Public Funding
• Increasing Private Funding
![Page 11: MBA Cultural Policy Comparison - USA, Japan and Canada](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070321/558c69f6d8b42ae7508b4737/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
LINCOLN CENTER• Non-profit (most donation from Rockefeller)
• Initiated by The Mayor's Slum Clearance Committee
• Urban Renewal
• Opera house, Concert Halls, Music School
• Marginal Public Funding
![Page 12: MBA Cultural Policy Comparison - USA, Japan and Canada](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070321/558c69f6d8b42ae7508b4737/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
ROPPONGI ART DISTRICT• Mix of Non-profit and For-profit
• Economic Development
• 3 Museums (2 Private Museums and 1 National Arts Center)
• Form the Arts Triangle
• Resulted in commercial success
![Page 13: MBA Cultural Policy Comparison - USA, Japan and Canada](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070321/558c69f6d8b42ae7508b4737/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
CONCLUSION• Harbourfront Centre needs to be more commercial
• But cannot compromise its mission
• Could learn from the US organizations about private funds
• Programming should be aimed at ‘creative class’
• The Japan case tells that the government can support the initiative for economic growth
<Takeaways>
• Country comparison let us see a bigger picture
• This leads to deeper understanding of the issue
• Results in a better suggestion