Download - Manchester feb 2013 small
![Page 1: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Balloon debate:Responsible innovation in geoengineering
[email protected] @jackstilgoe
Manchester, Feb 2013
![Page 2: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Synthetic biology
![Page 8: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
‘Research Councils have a responsibility to scrutinize the potential impacts and risks of emerging technologies, and encourage the researchers we fund to do likewise.... The challenge will be to define an approach that promotes creativity and innovation in research underpinned by a commitment to its responsible development.’
David Delpy, ESPRC CEO
![Page 11: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The what, the how and the why of innovation
Products
• What are the likely risks and benefits ?
• How will the risks and benefits be distributed?
• What other impacts can we predict ?
• How might these change in the future?
• What don’t we know about?
• What might we never know about?
Processes
• How should research and innovation take place?
• How should standards be drawn up and applied?
• How should risks and benefits be defined and measured?
• Who is in control?• Who will take
responsibility if things go wrong?
• What if we are wrong?
Purposes
• Why should this research be undertaken?
• Who will benefit ?• What are the
alternatives?• Who gets to decide?
![Page 12: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Pathologies of innovation
– Late lessons from early warnings (EEA)– The dilemma of control (David Collingridge)– Systemic risk and normal accidents (Charles Perrow)– Technological lock-in (Paul David)– Myths of techno-fixes (Dan Sarewitz)– Altered nature of human action (Hans Jonas)– Organised irresponsibility (Ulrich Beck)– Expectations and Imaginaries (Brown, Hedgecoe, Jasanoff,
Wynne et al.)– Deficit models of publics (Brian Wynne)– Society as a laboratory (Krohn and Weyer)
![Page 13: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
On responsibility
• From retrospective… (accountability and liability)
• … to prospective (care and responsiveness)• … and collective• Role responsibilities and general
responsibilities• Second-order (or meta-)responsibilities
![Page 14: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
On innovation
• Non-linear• Socio-technical• Systemic
Responsible innovation is ‘collective care for the future through the stewardship of innovation in the present’
![Page 15: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Four characteristics of responsible innovation
Reflexive Anticipatory
Responsive Inclusive
![Page 16: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Mechanisms for responsible innovation
• Life-cycle analysis• Risk assessment• Ethics committees• Public dialogue• Foresight• Codes of conduct• Multidisciplinary collaboration and technology appraisal• Training and capacity-building• Institutional structures• Systems of reward and recognition, intellectual property, standards,
publication, peer review• … and more
![Page 17: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
“The imaginary made real”
![Page 18: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Stratospheric Particle Injection
for Climate Engineering
(SPICE)
![Page 19: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
![Page 21: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
![Page 22: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
![Page 26: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
![Page 28: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
![Page 29: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
![Page 32: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Conditions for acceptance (Macnaghten and Szerszynski, 2013, GEC)
1. Confidence in the scientific consensus on climate 2. Conviction that SRM will be effective, cost effective and
operational3. Trust in science to identify and mitigate side-effects before
deployment4. Consensus that mitigation policies are flawed5. Confidence that geoengineering deployment would
complement rather than replace mitigation6. Guarantee that ‘benign’ intent can be separated from others 7. Belief that SRM geoengineering can be governed
democratically
![Page 33: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
![Page 34: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
![Page 36: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Stage gate criteria
1. Safety2. Compliance3. Framing and Communication (reflexive)4. Imagination of applications and
implications (anticipatory, reflexive)5. Hearing public and stakeholder views
(inclusive)
![Page 37: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
![Page 38: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
![Page 39: Manchester feb 2013 small](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050919/5469b0ccaf7959842c8b611b/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)