Download - Legal Tools & Strategies to Abate Blight
Legal Tools & Strategies to Abate Blight
Jessica L. Powell, Chief Counsel of Quality of Life, City of Cincinnati Solicitor's Office
513-352-3945
City of Cincinnati – Overview of “the Problem”
The City of Cincinnati has 2200 vacant problem buildings. The greatest challenge is finding the funding to demolish the
many abandoned buildings that are beyond repair. Laws that are founded on the presumption that “all land has
value” can come up short in light of the conditions created by the housing and foreclosure crisis. The private market does not take care of these abandoned properties and they become a burden to local government.
2
Tools to Combating Blights OVERVIEW
1. Addressing Blight Before it Happens
2. Code Enforcement 3. Legal Action and Advocacy 4. Partnerships
Part I: Addressing Blight Before It Happens
• Problem – The City’s code enforcement is reactive. By the time the City cites a blighted property or utilizes other tools, the costs associated with repair have skyrocketed, making demolition the “only” option
• Problem – The City’s demolition Funds are limited
Part I: Addressing Blight Before It Happens
• In Summer 2015, the City of Cincinnati partnered with the University of Chicago’s Data Science for Social Good (DSSG) program to embark on an analysis of whether the City could identify blight before it happened.
Part I: Addressing Blight Before It Happens
• A Brief History of Data Science for Social Good • Founded in 2013 by Obama 2012 Chief Data Scientist Rayid Ghani,
funded by Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt • Fellows are: computer scientists / statisticians / social scientists • 12 projects per year with non-profit and government partners • Mission: Training data scientists to tackle problems that really matter • Some highlights: – Lead hazard prediction model for Chicago Dept. of Public Health – Early warning system for struggling high school students – Identifying factors that elevate maternal mortality in Mexico • The City of Cincinnati was one of 12 projects chosen by the DSSG
project out of 500 applicants.
Part I: Addressing Blight Before It Happens
• DSSG GOAL: Help the city of Cincinnati combat blight more effectively by using data science methods to explore the effects of various factors on blight.
• 1. Creat Actionable Insight -Provide a list of properties ranked by likelihood of having a building violation and the possibility to prioritize inspections
• 2. Get a Small, Concrete Win that Demonstrates to Power of Analytics - Use the project as a pilot to develop out the City’s predictive analytics problem solving approach
Part II: Code Enforcement City of Cincinnati – Property Maintenance Code
Enforcement The Property Maintenance Division is charged with
eliminating blight and building safety hazards and promotes building repair and renovation through education and enforcement to protect the public health, safety and quality of life.
PMCE received about 6,000 requests for service each year. These requests include tenant complaints about poor housing conditions and neighbor complaints of blight on commercial and residential buildings and premises.
Part II: Code Enforcement City of Cincinnati – Weed & Litter
The City’s Department of Public Services receives over 4,000 complaints for weed and litter per year. Of this, approximately 3,000 complaints
result in a ciatation For 2015, there are over 900 lots
awaiting abatement.
14
Part II: Code Enforcement City of Cincinnati – Concentrated Code Enforcement
At various times, the City undertakes Concentrated Code Enforcement in a particular neighborhood. Concentrated Code Enforcement is a house-to-house inspection in code enforcement areas.
All buildings in a neighborhood focus area are inspected on the exterior for property maintenance issues. It is a systematic and proactive approach to addressing code violations and is typically performed as part of the Neighborhood Enhancement Program.
Most recent concentrated code enforcement effort was in Walnut Hills
15
Part III: Legal Action & Advocacy
• Ordinances – Vacated Building Maintenance License (CMC 1101-
61 et. Seq.) – Vacant Foreclosed Property Registration (CMC
Chapter 1123) – Private Lot Abatement Ordinance (CMC Chapters
713 and 741)
Part III: Legal Action & Advocacy
• Legislative – HB 134 – Expedited foreclosure Bill – Note: possible attempt by GA to preempt local
foreclosure registration ordinances!
Part III: Legal Action & Advocacy Public Nuisance Receivership Actions – ORC3767.41
Action filed in Common Pleas court to have a receiver appointed to abate the nuisance conditions
City considers filing when other avenues for compliance have been exhausted
Receiver motivation = costs for repairs become a super-priority lien on property
Challenge = Not always economically feasible if cost of repairs > value of property
Bigger challenge = Hamilton County does not have a housing court
18
Part III: Legal Action & Advocacy City of Cincinnati – Legal Remedies
Criminal Liability for Failure to Comply with Ordinances Requiring Maintenance
19
Used for more serious violations involving safety issues, willful disregard of the code, and/or longstanding violations. Failure to comply with orders under Cincinnati Municipal Code Sec. 1101-71 is a first degree misdemeanor punishable by 6 months in jail and/or a $1000.00 fine. Challenge = corporate and LLC owners cannot be tried in abstentia (State of Ohio v. TC Funding Group, 1st Dist. No. C-090191)
Part III: Legal Action & Advocacy Miscellaneous
Collection actions on fine, fees and abatement costs
Action under RC 715.261 to foreclose on barricade / demolition liens (eff. November 2014 – what municipalities are doing this?
Common Law Nuisance Claims Statutory nuisance based on criminal activity
(see R.C. 3767.01 et seq.) Go after the bigger offenders
20
Part IV – Essential Partnerships
• CDC’s • Legal Aid Society • Tenants • Community Councils • Treasurer’s Office • Land Bank • Local policy groups • Elected representatives • Others