Learning from crisis and returning to growth by means of leadership development within
the Public sector: the Irish experience"
Presentation to DISPA, Rome
Dr Brian CawleyDirector General, IPA
Institute of Public Administration | 57-61 Lansdowne Road | Dublin 4 | Ireland | Ph. +353 1 2403600 | www.ipa.ie
Evolution of Economic StrategyPost-war insular, protectionist approach led to stagnationRadical policies initiated in late 50’s led to export-led growth policyLeading to the development of a modern economy heavily oriented towards service sector- pharma, tech, financeAttracting Multinationals to Ireland
Low corporation tax Access to EU markets and role of EU membership High education attainment levels and ready supply of highly
qualified workforce Role of Irish emigrants, particularly in US Focus on niche areas in technology, pharmaceuticals,
healthcare and now biotech, software (gaming), green technologies
Alignment of academic research and education with this strategy
Foundations of the ‘Celtic Tiger economy’
Economic Crisis Solid sustainable growth replaced by ‘housing bubble’ Narrowing of tax base Bank insolvency and fiscal collapse EU/IMF/ECB bailout with €64bn injection to banks Rapid growth replaced by contraction of economy (10% each
year from 2008-2010) From full employment to 15% unemployment International factors, but also national factors
© IPA 4
© IPA 5
This crisis was not unique in our public administration“Public unease stems not just from the failure itself, but from a feeling that collectively we do not learn from failure, leaving us not only as poor but as puzzled as before”What do we learn from Official Reviews?
© IPA 6
“International developments, however, did not in themselves cause the crisis though they helped precipitate it. The problems causing the crisis as well as the scale of it were the result of domestic Irish decisions and actions”. (Nyberg 2011: ii).
Early Warning signs ignored
“the Ministry of Finance should have adapted its advice in tone and urgency after a number of years of fiscal complacency.. it should have shown more initiative in making these points”
© IPA 7
GROUPTHINK“Why did so many professionally adept Irish bankers and public servants (as well as politicians, entrepreneurs, experts, media and households) simultaneously come to makeassessments and decisions that have later proven seriously
unsound in a number of ways?Groupthink occurs when people adapt to the beliefs and views of others without real intellectual conviction. A consensus forms without serious consideration of consequences or alternatives,
often under overt or imaginary social pressure.” (Nyberg 8)
© IPA 8
Silencing of Contrary Views/Avoiding Conflict“people indicated to us that contrarian views were both difficult to maintain during the long boom and unhealthy to present to boards or superiors. A number of people stated that had they implemented or consistently supported contrarian policies they may ultimately have lost their jobs, positions, or reputations. ”
(Nyberg 2011: iii).
© IPA 9
© IPA 10
‘Quick Fix ‘ Solutions“Over the years the accumulation of successive incremental fixes in response to minor and major technical, administrative , and management problems in the systems daily operations has resulted in a technically deficient, managerially uncoordinated, inefficient and excessively resourced system”
Reform, including public sector reform, has for decades emphasised technical, but not adaptive,
change“The public sector modernization project in Ireland was widely supported in principle from the early to mid- 1990s on. But its implementation was limited on all the conventional measures. It was stronger on symbolic areas such as customer service statements than on real substantive change.”
© IPA 11
Systemic nature of Public Administration
“the nature of systemic banking crises rarely allows blame and responsibility to be confidently allocated. Systemic financial crises, like the recent Irish one, require a great number of institutions, enterprises and individuals to simultaneously follow unsound policies or practices”
© IPA 12
Multiple agencies- who takes responsibility?
“the view was expressed to the Commission that it was not the primary responsibility of the Central Bank to evaluate possible problems in domestic financial markets emanating from the behaviour of individual institutions”(Nyberg 66).
© IPA 13
The failure to adapt was a failure of leadership
“The current crisis raises questions about leadership and adaptation on the part of Irish public administration. There is a need to address problems related to culture and change that require solutions that must come from outside the current
repertoire. “
© IPA 14
Different approach and Emphasis Leadership is about promoting adaptation in complex
systems Requires a tolerance for conflict and ‘distress’ Achieving a better balance between risk and reward Relationship is fundamental (and had been
neglected)
© IPA 15
Leadership Development -Objective To build a community of practice and learning
at the most senior levels of public service that shares a common framework, common principles, and shared understanding of how leadership challenges are identified, framed, and tackled
© IPA 16
Key principles of programme design
Real Problems, Real People, Real Outcomes Case in Point pedagogy Discovering Authentic Leadership The role of Purpose
© IPA 17
Leadership Programme 5 years on Over 300 senior public servants to date Almost 100% of those at Permanent Secretary
level Big demand for programme Tracking of progress on challenges International groups
© IPA 18
© IPA 19
Training and Development such as the Leadership Challenge Programme help us learn from the past, to adapt and build new capacity in the system and create the conditions for growth