Transcript
Page 1: Lake Tsala Apopka  Water Quality Data Report

Lake Tsala Apopka Water Quality Data Report

Citrus/Hernando Waterways Restoration Council

Citrus County Task ForceSeptember 12, 2011

Page 2: Lake Tsala Apopka  Water Quality Data Report
Page 3: Lake Tsala Apopka  Water Quality Data Report

Lakes with the most consistent sampling frequency

Bellamy CooterCroft DoddFloral City Ft. CooperHampton HendersonHernando Little (Consuella)Little Henderson SpiveyTodd

Page 4: Lake Tsala Apopka  Water Quality Data Report

Lakes with the least consistent sampling frequency

BradleyCatoDavisMagnoliaPoint LonesomeTussockVan Ness

Page 5: Lake Tsala Apopka  Water Quality Data Report

Total Nitrogen, 2011 Average

• <1 mg/L – Good conditions, low risk of water quality degradation

• 1-1.5 mg/L – Fair conditions, within seasonal averages

• >1.5 mg/L - System may be prone to sudden reductions in water quality, algae blooms

Page 6: Lake Tsala Apopka  Water Quality Data Report

Total Nitrogen, 2011 Average• Bellamy - 1.10 • Bradley - 1.34 • Cato - 0.78 • Cooter - 0.46 • Croft - 1.11 • Davis - 1.01 • Dodd - 1.14 • Floral City - 1.07• Fort Cooper - 0.98 • Hampton - 0.99 • Henderson - 0.97 • Hernando - 1.02 • Little (Consuella) - 0.83 • Little Henderson - 0.96 • Magnolia – No Data• Point Lonesome - 1.50 • Spivey - 0.97 • Todd - 1.12 • Tussock - 1.09 • Van Ness - 1.14

Page 7: Lake Tsala Apopka  Water Quality Data Report

Total Nitrogen, 2010 Average• Bellamy - 1.20 • Bradley - 1.72 • Cato - 1.61 • Cooter - 0.42 • Croft - 1.34 • Davis - 1.55 • Dodd - 1.27 • Floral City - 1.41 • Fort Cooper - 1.11 • Hampton - 1.39 • Henderson - 1.36 • Hernando - 1.30 • Little (Consuella) - 0.80 • Little Henderson - 1.30 • Magnolia - 0.63 • Point Lonesome - 1.43 • Spivey - 1.49 • Todd - 1.26 • Tussock - 1.33 • Van Ness - 1.37

Page 8: Lake Tsala Apopka  Water Quality Data Report

Total Phosphorus, 2011 Average

• <0.05 mg/L – Good conditions

• 0.05-0.1 mg/L – Fair conditions, within seasonal averages

• >0.1 ug/L - System may see a rapid increase in algal growth

Page 9: Lake Tsala Apopka  Water Quality Data Report

Total Phosphorus, 2011 Average• Bellamy - 0.019 • Bradley - 0.024 • Cato - 0.058 • Cooter - 0.025 • Croft - 0.015 • Davis - 0.022 • Dodd - 0.017 • Floral City - 0.033 • Fort Cooper - 0.011 • Hampton - 0.032 • Henderson - 0.019 • Hernando - 0.017 • Little (Consuella) - 0.027 • Little Henderson - 0.018 • Magnolia – No data • Point Lonesome - 0.028 • Spivey - 0.020 • Todd - 0.016 • Tussock - 0.045 • Van Ness - 0.015

Page 10: Lake Tsala Apopka  Water Quality Data Report

Total Phosphorus, 2010 Average• Bellamy - 0.019 • Bradley - 0.037 • Cato - 0.097 • Cooter - 0.027 • Croft - 0.014 • Davis - 0.035 • Dodd - 0.016 • Floral City - 0.056 • Fort Cooper - 0.011 • Hampton - 0.054 • Henderson - 0.027 • Hernando - 0.016 • Little (Consuella) - 0.019 • Little Henderson - 0.022 • Magnolia - 0.018 • Point Lonesome - 0.035 • Spivey - 0.034 • Todd - 0.016 • Tussock - 0.059 • Van Ness - 0.016

Page 11: Lake Tsala Apopka  Water Quality Data Report

Total Chlorophyll, 2011 Average

• <15 ug/L – Good conditions, low incidence of algae

• 15-30 ug/L – Fair conditions, within seasonal averages

• >30 ug/L - System may become low in oxygen, low in light penetration

Page 12: Lake Tsala Apopka  Water Quality Data Report

Total Chlorophyll, 2011 Average• Bellamy - 5.42 • Bradley - 12.30 • Cato - 14.99 • Cooter - 4.38 • Croft - 5.17 • Davis - 3.84 • Dodd - 6.46 • Floral City - 12.18 • Fort Cooper - 1.58 • Hampton - 15.71 • Henderson - 5.43 • Hernando - 6.05 • Little (Consuella) - 6.88 • Little Henderson - 5.80 • Magnolia – No Data • Point Lonesome - 8.10 • Spivey - 5.93 • Todd - 5.67 • Tussock - 19.84 • Van Ness - 3.27

Page 13: Lake Tsala Apopka  Water Quality Data Report

Total Chlorophyll, 2010 Average• Bellamy - 6.66 • Bradley - 26.71 • Cato - 8.89 • Cooter - 3.68 • Croft - 5.97 • Davis - 21.39 • Dodd - 9.06 • Floral City - 12.72 • Fort Cooper - 1.59 • Hampton - 19.20 • Henderson - 17.23 • Hernando - 9.07 • Little (Consuella) - 6.07 • Little Henderson - 15.23 • Magnolia - 2.57 • Point Lonesome - 15.63 • Spivey - 33.95 • Todd - 7.74 • Tussock - 26.58 • Van Ness - 4.75

Page 14: Lake Tsala Apopka  Water Quality Data Report

Trophic State Index, 2011 Average

• 0 – 50 – Good conditions, low risk of algae blooms

• 50-70 – Fair conditions, water quality may be degraded

• 70+ - System is experiencing trophic collapse, fish kills and algae blooms may occur

Page 15: Lake Tsala Apopka  Water Quality Data Report

Trophic State Index, 2011 Average• Bellamy - 42.5 • Bradley - 46.7 • Cato - 51.5 • Cooter - 34.0 • Croft - 39.2 • Davis - 39.5 • Dodd - 42.9 • Floral City - 50.7 • Fort Cooper - 26.2 • Hampton - 54.7 • Henderson - 42.6 • Hernando - 42.5 • Little (Consuella) - 46.5 • Little Henderson - 42.0 • Magnolia - No Data• Point Lonesome - 46.4 • Spivey - 43.4 • Todd - 40.1 • Tussock - 57.0 • Van Ness - 35.6

Page 16: Lake Tsala Apopka  Water Quality Data Report

Trophic State Index, 2010 Average• Bellamy - 43.1 • Bradley - 54.6 • Cato - 58.3 • Cooter - 37.3• Croft - 39.0• Davis - 53.0 • Dodd - 42.9 • Floral City - 53.2 • Fort Cooper - 26.8• Hampton - 54.1 • Henderson - 50.4 • Hernando - 42.8 • Little (Consuella) - 42.9 • Little Henderson - 49.9 • Magnolia - 37.4 • Point Lonesome - 51.9 • Spivey - 52.4 • Todd - 42.5 • Tussock - 58.1 • Van Ness - 38.8

Page 17: Lake Tsala Apopka  Water Quality Data Report

Conclusions

• Data for all lakes was well within state standards (where applicable)

• Water Quality in 2011 so far is much better than in 2010 in most locations

• Historically, water quality increases as you move south to north. But with nutrient data it appears that the Nitrogen levels in the Inverness has been better than the Hernando Pool.


Top Related