Download - LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
1/81
FORM GEN. 160 (Rev. 6-80) CITY OF LOS ANGELESINTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE
Date: April 1, 2005
From:
The Honorable City Councilc/o City Clerk, Rm 395, City HallAttention: Honorable Antonio Vilaraigosa, Transportation Committee
wf. :~ Tanda General Mangerent of Transportation
To:
Subject: COMMUNITY DASH NEED ASSESSMENT STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS(C.F. 04-0823-S1)
SUMMARY
The Community DASH Need Assessment Study, prepared by the Deparment of Transportation(LADOT) with the assistance of its consultant, Transportation Management and Design (TMD),has produced a raned/prioritized list of potential new Community DASH routes to beconsidered for implementation by the City, subject to available funding. The Study also includesrecommendations for remedial actions for those few existing Community DASH routes whichare currently performing poorly or marginally (as determined by the Council-adopted transitservice performance standards). The list of new DASH routes is intended to guide the growth ofthe DASH system, as fuding permits, over the next seven to ten years. Because of the curentand short-term future fuding constraints, and the context of the ongoing MTA MetroConnections planing exercise, additional recommendations are also hereby transmitted with theintent of maximizing transit funding while also preserving any enhanced fuding for purposes ofexpanding the supply of transit service to City residents.RECOMMENDATIONSThat the City Council:1. Adopt this report and attachments prepared by LADOT with the assistance of itsconsultant, Transportation Management and Design (TMD), as its report on this matter.2. Adopt the recommended prioritized list of Potential New Community DASH Routes
Exhibit E-l) as the guide for future expansion of the Community DASH system, subject toavailable funding3. Consider inclusion of sufficient operating and capital funding in the City's FY 2005/06Budget for the implementation of the top one or two raned new DASH routes as listed in
Exhibit E-l.
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
2/81
The Honorable City Council -2- April 1, 2005
4. Resolve to include in the City s Legislative Program support for federal, state and localfunding for replacement of existing City transit vehicles, and for purchase and/oroperation of new transit vehicles for the top five recommended new or expandedCommunity DASH routes as listed in Exhibit E-l.
5. Direct LADOT, in cooperation with affected Council Offces, to:(a) Initiate the public hearing process to implement the Study s cost neutral recommendations
Exhibit E-2) concerning the restructuring of the existing marginal/poor performing DASHFairfax, DASH Hollywood/West Hollywood, DASH Beachwood Canyon and DASH VanNuys/Studio City services after the Department has pursued reasonable remedial steps(including additional marketing) to improve the performance of these services.
(b) Implement expanded DASH Warer Center service to complement the opening of theMetro Orange Line in September, 2005.6. Direct the CAO, in cooperation with LADOT, to report back to the Transportation Committeeof Council regarding potential alternative DASH transit fuding sources, such asMICLAlonding, local Proposition C fuds and assessment districts for expansion of theCommunity DASH system.7. Adopt as a policy, in response to potential MTA bus service reductions within Cityboundaries, to not substitute Community DASH for cancelled MTA service unless the
City is guaranteed on-going funding for the operation of that replacement DASHservice route, such as through inclusion of the route in the County Formula AllocationProcedure F AP).
8. Adopt as a policy that the City, through its representatives on the MTA Board,aggressively pursue a fare reimbursement agreement for all DASH routes tohonor MT A passes.
BACKGROUNDThis Deparment initiated the citywide Community DASH Need Assessment Study during FY2003-04, executing a contract (City Contract C-I06512) with a consultant team headed byTransportation Management and Design (TMD), in April 2004. The consultant team includesparicipation by the UCLA Deparment of Urban Planning/Institute of Transportation Studies inits Senior Advisory Committee.The two primar objectives of the Study have been to: (1) analyze the existing CommunityDASH services operating in Los Angeles and the communities in which they operate to make
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
3/81
The Honorable City Council -3- April 1, 2005
recommendations for the implementation of new, viable service in areas of the City with goodtransit potential; and (2) recommend measures to improve existing Community DASH serviceswhich are under-performing in terms of productivity and cost-effectiveness based on the CityCouncil adopted transit performance standards. The overall Study goal was to produce aprioritized list of new and/or modified Community DASH services that the City may consider forimplementation, subject to available funding, over the next ten years.Note that the study area does not include Downtown Los Angeles (the area generally bounded bythe 101 Freeway/Los Angeles RRver/lO Freeway/110 Freeway). A Downtown DASHRestructuing Study is to be caried out by the Deparment during FY 2005/06
DISCUSSIONStudy MethodologyThe consultant team produced a methodology to identify areas within Los Angeles (outside ofDowntown) of potential transit need/demand and to predict the Performance Index (PI) score ofany new proposed or restructured Community DASH service. The PI score is a composite ofthree factors (passengers per revenue hour; subsidy per passenger mile; operating ratio) which,per City Council-adopted policy (CF 98-1121), are utilized by this Deparment to evaluate transitservice performance on an annual basis. This predictive performance evaluation methodologyfollows a four step sequence:(1) Predict Community DASH Performance: For each existing Community DASH route,analyze the characteristics of the community or communities it operates in and develop a modelbased on those characteristics which predict each route s PI score.(2) Critical Factors Analysis: Identify bariers to performance success and other transitoperational factors to be considered for remedy as a condition of service implementation.3) Transit Service Supply and Unmet Transit Need/Demand: Identify areas of Los Angeles with
an under-supply of transit service which therefore present potential unmet transit need/demand.Note that areas of Los Angeles with population densities of 5 persons or fewer per acre and/oremployment densities of 5 jobs or fewer per acre were excluded from the analysis; public fixedroute transit simply canot be provided in a cost-effective manner in those areas.(4) Community DASH Potential: Analyze areas with high levels ofunmet transit need/demandwhich also present higher predicted PI scores, resulting in a combined score which reflects anarea s potential for community-based transit (i.e., Community DASH-type service).
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
4/81
The Honorable City Council -4- April 1,2005
A more detailed discussion of the steps in this sequence is presented on pp. 22 - 28 ofAttachment II.The resultant predictive model was then translated into a performance analysis for the screeningand evaluation of proposed new Community DASH routes as well as for evaluation of remedialmeasures for under-performing existing Community DASH routes. For this Study, proposals fornew DASH service were collected from City Council offices, residents and transit riders viapublic meetings and via our project website (ww.tmdinc.net/clients/LADOT). LADOT TransitBureau and MTA staff, previous (mid- to late 1990 s) transit restructuring studies (i.e.recommendations from those studies which have not been implemented to-date), earlier (1999/200112003 Biennial MT A Call for Projects Transit Capital project proposals, and from theconsultant team based on the findings of the Study analysis.There were over 100 route/service suggestions collected through this Study process. Out of theseapproximately 100 DASH route suggestions, 85 potentially viable proposed new service/modified curent routes were analyzed, along with several route/service modifications for anumber of curent Community DASH routes which are under-performing (annual PI scores .(0.70 . The complete list of potentially viable routes, in alphabetical order with commentary, ispresented in Attachment II. Our analysis has produced a list of 20 recommended viable new, orenhanced existing, Communty DASH service routes. These recommended new and enhancedDASH routes, scored and raned, are attached as Exhibit E-1.Public Participation
A first round of public meetings was conducted during July 2004 at each of the seven City AreaPlaning Commission venues. Notification was provided through the numerous certifiedNeighborhood Councils (via e-mail) as well as through direct mail/e-mail/telephone contactswith interested individual or groups identified through previous transit planning exercises and byCouncil offces. Notices were also posted on our existing DASH bus fleet. Briefings, withsolicitation of input, were also presented to each of the three MT A Sector Governance Councilswhose territories are located in whole or in part within City boundaries in July and August of2004.A second round of six public meetings, and briefings to MT A Sector Governance Councils, wasconducted in Februar and early March 2005 to present preliminary Study findings. In addition tothe public meetings and briefings, the project website referenced above was established toprovide both information and downloadable Study maps/reports, as well as to provide anadditional opportunity for public input. For the under-performing current Community DASHroutes, focus group meetings with riders and community representatives were conducted;interviews were also conducted with bus operators assigned to the under-performing routes. Amore detailed discussion of the public outreach effort is found on pp. i 0 - 12 of Attachment III.
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
5/81
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
6/81
The Honorable City Council -6- April 1,2005
DASH routes discussed in Exhibit E-3 attached), the Deparment wil pursue reasonableavailable steps to improve the performance of these services. Depending on the success of theseadditional remedial actions in improving performance, the Deparment may recommend in aseparate report) the cancellation of these and any other mature marginal performing transitservices with the objective of freeing up transit resources which could be re-allocated tofacilitate implementation of one or more of the new higher-scoring recommended DASH routes.This may involve an amendment to the existing Council adopted transit performance guidelinesto improve marginal services; these guidelines identify steps to improve service performance butdo not provide direction to cancel marginal services in the event that performance is notenhanced over time).Note that during the Study period, 2004 performance data became available which indicatedsignificant improvement for the DASH San Pedro and DASH Hollywood/Wilshire routes incomparison with their 2003 PI scores. DASH San Pedro improved from a 0.61 score to 0.82;DASH Hollywood /Wilshire improved from 0.47 to 0.71 - in both cases, sufficient improvementto move these routes up out of the marginal or poor performance range. Thus, substantialremedial actions for these two routes are no longer required. A sumar of the key findings forall existing marginal or poor performing DASH routes is provided in Exhibit E-3.Warer Center DASH / Orange Line Interface: A Special Case - DASH Warer Center, from itsinception, has performed poorly based on the anual transit service performance evaluations.However, DASH Warer Center iias never been truly comparable to the other Community DASHroutes in that it is a weekday, mid-day service only unlike the standard Community DASHservice span which is 7 am til 7 pm weekdays plus weekend service). The existing DASHWarer Center service utilizes Commuter Express Line 575 Simi Valley to Warner Center)vehicles which would otherwise simply be laying over through the mid-day awaiting earlyevening retur trips to Simi Valley from Warer Center.The commencement of Metro Orange Line busway service in September 2005 connectingWarer Center to the North Hollywood Red Line station) could create an effective demand forDASH service within and around Warer Center; and a local circulator appears to be essential forOrange Line riders to complete their trips to or from the Warner Center Transit Hub the westerlyterminus ofthe Orange Line). With a restructuring of Commuter Express Line 575 service, itwould be possible to establish standard Community DASH service for Warer Center to coincidewith the opening of the Orange Line if additional operating funds can be appropriated.The Department is currently evaluating the possibility of utilizing Warer Center Trust Fundmonies to help fund the enhanced DASH Warer Center service. A private development-fudedstudy is also planned subject to LADOT review) which wil expand upon the efforts of thisStudy to fuher refine the design of the DASH Warer Center route.
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
7/81
The Honorable City Council -7- April 1, 2005
Critical BarriersThe Study also provides findings relative to critical performance bariers for Community DASHservice, takng into account past and current performance as well as projected performance.These critical bariers can be sumarized into three tyes:1) Fare Integration with MT A : Currently only five of our 27 Community DASH routes honorMT A passes, for which the City receives reimbursement from MT A. (Downtown DASH honorsMT A passes, but the City receives no reimbursement.) This lack of fare integration is a barier toincreased transit ridership. The Community DASH family of routes functions as a local circulatorsystem and a feeder system to regional MT A transit services (bus and rail). Due to its highercost, and the price sensitivity of Community DASH riders (over 70 of whom have anualincomes of less than 20,000), the Metro EZ Pass has not proven to be an effective fareintegration alternative for Community DASH. Unlike other municipal operators (Santa MonicaBlue Bus, Culver Citybus, Foothil Transit, etc.) with defined service areas distinct from MTAservice areas, the City's Community DASH operates wholly within the MTA service area andcomplements MTA bus and rail service. Fare integration (wherein Communty DASH honorsMT A passes, and MT A reimburses the City) has the potential to boost ridership on both systemsby facilitating transfers. This fare integration seems especially appropriate for those CommunityDASH routes which serve MT A rail or busway stations.(2) Transfer of Service from MT A to LADOT without Provision of Operating Funds: Based onthe performance records of those former failing SCR TD routes which were taken over byLADOT at the request of City Council (Beachwood Canyon (formerly RTD Line 208); Los Feliz(formerly RTD Line 203); San Pedro (formerly RTD Line 147)), poor-performing RTD/MTAroutes or segments of routes typically become poor-performing Community DASH routes,despite fare integration and a reduced fare (although DASH San Pedro has just recently climbedup above the marginal performance level). Therefore, the Department recommends that, if andwhen the MTA proposes to eliminate service due to low ridership (and/or due to MetroConnections transit restructuring), the City should not agree to inherit the service responsibilitywithout also assuming operating fuds from MTA. Cost savings which accrue to MTA fromelimination of its service should be shared with the City if LADOT is to provide replacement bustransit service; the City wil otherwise be locked in to utilizing our heavily-committedProposition A fuds toward replacement service (and thus no net gain in transit service to Cityresidents) rather than investing in expansion of the Community DASH system through thisStudy's recommended routes.(3) Operational Barriers: This Study concludes that certain operational factors have criticalimpact on the performance of a Community DASH route. Route length is one of these; if a routeis shorter in length than five miles, it typically canot connect enough desired destinations toattract sufficient ridership. A route may also be too long (in excess of 10 miles), traversing low
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
8/81
The Honorable City Council -8- April 1, 2005
density neighborhoods, to perform well. Also, to the extent that Community DASH serviceduplicates other available bus service, this tends to negatively impact DASH performance. Theseoperational bariers can be compounded by land use/demographic factors.Note that based on 2004 data, the average DASH ridership is 47 passengers per hour per bus,with an average passenger trip length of slightly less than one mile. This fits the DASH profieof local circulator/feeder service characterized by short passenger trips and relatively rapidturnover in passenger load.Implementation Context / Funding ConstraintsAs previously reported to the Transportation Committee in November 2004, the Deparment hasprepared a 10-year projection of the City's Proposition A Local Transit Assistance (PALTA)transit fuds which indicates that identification of additional fuding sources and/or increasedcost savings wil be required for expansion of Community DASH program. The City's share ofProposition A fuds is the primar fuding source for the City s public transit program, includingits Community DASH services. Based on the conservative revenue projections utilized in ouranalysis, the continuing operation costs of our current family of transit services, along withscheduled vehicle replacement costs for our fleet of over 380 transit vehicles, wil leave minimalremaining Proposition A fuding for any expansion of the Community DASH system. TheDeparment estimated that only one or two new Community DASH routes could be implementedover the next ten years utilizing existing revenue sources. This assumes that curently unallocatedCity Proposition A funds are not utilized for other new projects. The Deparment estimates thateach new DASH route would require $1.5 milion in vehicle acquisition costs (four buses andone spare), and approximately $725,000 per year in ongoing annual operating expenses.Unlike the period between 1993 - 2001, it appears that the MTA Biennial Call for Projects wilnot be a reliable source of star-up (vehicle acquisition) funding for new DASH routes given thecancellation of the 2003 and 2005 Calls. Furher, implementing new DASH servicesimmediately based on the recommendations of this Study, would mean that the City would likelybe foregoing the possibility of obtaining capital grant fuding for these routes when it becomesavailable as the fuding is not reimbursable retroactively. The City needs to identify potentialnew revenue sources, whether it be from grant funding, City local Proposition C fuds, bonding,assessment districts, etc., in order to be able to substantially expand the Community DASHprogram.The curent MT A Metro Connections transit restructuring exercise must also be taken intoaccount. Metro Connections (formerly called hub-and-spoke ) wil tend to orient MTA busservice away from local (Tier 3) service to more narowly focus on hub-to-hub line haul (Tiers1 and 2) routes, with a resultant elimination of lower ridership local service and redeployment ofthese resources elsewhere. Elimination of MT A service within City boundaries has typically led
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
9/81
The Honorable City Council -9- April 1,2005
to pressure for LADOT to fill the void by replacing the canceled MT A local service with DASH.As previously discussed, to the extent that the City Council chooses this option without securingadditional funding from the MT A the limited City Proposition A funding available for newDASH routes wil be further eroded.In recognition of the fiscal challenges the City is facing in order to expand the CommuntyDASH program, the Deparment is forwarding a number of policy recommendations related toaggressively pursuing additional transit funding from MT A and to exploration ofalternative/additional City funding for DASH transit services. These potential alternative sourcesinclude grant fuding Proposition C local retur and assessment districts - sources which havebeen suggested during previous Transportation Committee discussions of City transit fuding.
COORDINATIONAs previously discussed the Deparment conducted a total of three rounds of Study briefings forCity Council Offce staff (June 2004; November 2004; January 2005). In addition, briefing/discussion sessions were conducted with individual Council offces by request. A Study update/status report was presented to the Transportation Committee at its Januar 26 2005 meeting.
IMP ACT ON THE BUDGETThe recommendations in this report do not result in an increase in City costs relative to the FY2004-05 Budget. Therefore, there is no impact on the Budget. Funding for expanded DASHservice would require approval in the City s FY 2005-06 Budget.
Exhibits:Exhibit E-1 - Recommended New and Expanded Community DASH RoutesExhibit E-2 - Cost Neutral Recommendations for Remedial ActionsExhibit E-3 - Remedial Actions to Improve Performance on Existing RoutesAttachments:Attachment I - Individual Recommended Route Maps (20)Attachment II - List of Route Proposals Evaluated (85)Attachment II - Study Executive Summar
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
10/81
Cmy
C
Re
DH
Ta
PredictedP
OWa
P
Cms
Dsc
Pea
Sy
ReMeVce
Se
25
VNWhs
12Mum
15
65
4Aenvdone
oP
2PcMn
7
SmSFn
12Mum
15
88
4Mnenmsereoomoao
111
EeRGaPk
12Mum
14
78
4Mnenmsereoomoao
89
NhUvyPk
11
Hg
18
46
3Reeh5membos
1
SPo7hSe
11
Lw
11
40
2Reeh5memboshRamSvc-
Aenv2b
pooMRe5o7hSea
6
SVeCrcao
11Mum
12
72
4RnmopeoNSVepo
oceewsae
roe
41
HywLFz(b
11
Lw
10
17
6Eooesnoeern2aovce
1
WeWasAenv2
10Mum
12
74
4RnmdoboP2PcMn
7
SmAea
10
Hg
13
51
3PaaenvohVNLeC
po
oewc
isoo
9
PodRo
10Mum
11
56
3Eooesnoeern2aovceenmo
Aenv2b
remnCyoLAesmoognpo
111
EyaVeCePk
10Mum
11
78
4RnmdoboP2PcMn
LnnHgs
EbE1(P1o2
RMNDNWEXADCM
TYDHR
aMbmemeseoMsvcaunc
bMcooesnCm
yDsvcernaoepmaec
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
11/81
Cmy
C
Re
DH
Ta
PredictedP
OWa
P
Cms
Dsc
Pea
Sy
ReMeVce
Se
11
HgaPkGaPk
10
Hg
11
66
3RnmdoboP2PcMn
11
MWano
10Mum
10
73
4RamSvcpooMRe1
Aenv3
1
Ano
10Mum
09
41
3Rembosh(05merenroefooaofao
7
HdSe
10
Hg
11
50
3RamSvcpooMRe2a
o
.0
0
o
0
0
00
LFz
McooesnsvcnvneamsvcoM
41
Aenv2b
09Mum
09
57
2Re2oVrgere1aovceo
bM
GewCeSvcSoa
1
PmRsAenv2
09Hg
11
68
4RnmcdeboP2PcMn
3
WanCe
09Mum
08
61
4RnmdoboP2PcMn
Aenv2b
1
HbCy
09Mum
08
59
4DcooGdRe2mbaswhG
26
NhHywCrcao
09Mum
07
62
4RnmopeoNSVepo
oceewsae
roe
EbE1(P2o2
RMNDNWEXADCM
TYDHR
aMbmemeseoMsvcaunc
bMcooesnCm
yDsvcernaoepmaec
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
12/81
ExhibitE2
CONRRO
OFORMAAO
C
CmyTa
OWa
P
RuueRe
DPea
PredictedPI
Cms
Dsc
Se
Sy
ReMeVce
SuoCy1Nh
R
cnaenmoesnVNSuo
24
10Hg
11
34
2CyoeboP1aP2PcMn
Hyw
mbmemeosdhoeanpo*
VNWe1
R
cnaenmoesnVNSuo
26
09Lw
07
59
3CyoeboP1aP2PcMn
Ke
mbmemeosdhoeanpo*
BwC
1
R
cnaoooeanBwa
45
08Hg
08
74
5Hyw
WeHywoembmeme
FmsMk
osdhoeanpo*
*RuueesnVN
SuoCyoeomopom
nhnpovSuoCyoesmsno1vce
fomh6ceyree
*RuueBwFraaHyw1W.Hywoewcceyere9vcenoa
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
13/81
Exhibit E-3 (Page 1 of 2)REMEDIAL ACTIONS TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE ONEXISTING ROUTESVan Nuys/Studio City (200~erformance ndex of 0.70; peak vehic es: 6). Resource neutral refinement of existing route to improve performance onthe non-productive Studio City route segment is shown in Exhibit E-2 intwo parts:
-- Studio City/North Hollywood Route Predicted Performance 1.12; 2peak vehicles)-- Van Nuys/Kester Route (Predicted Performance 0.77; 3 peak vehicles). Savings of 1 vehicle may be used on the new Van NuyslWhitsettRoute previously shown on Exhibit E-1), which serves, in part, some
of the area previously served by the existing Van Nuys/Studio Cityroute
Pueblo del Rio (2004 Performance Index of 0.61; peak vehicles: 1)Existing route is very short due to its origin; alternative to lengthen routeis included in new service recommendations in Exhibit E-1Rail connection requires fare integration
Fairfax Route (2004 Performance Index of 0.60; peak vehicles: 4). Alternative route alignments requiring additional vehicles are included in
Attachment II, but do little to improve overall performance. Option of expanding the existing shuttle route operated under the CityRideProgram for Park La Brea residents and replacing the remainder of theFairfax service with a new route alternative
HollvwoodlWest Hollvwood (2004 Performance Index of 0.57: peak vehicles: 4). Seek operating funds from West Hollywood. Rail connection requires fare integration with the MTA. Alternative route alignments were evaluated but do little to improve
performance. If the first two actions are not implemented and/or do not result inimproved performance, then consider route restructuring
. Cancel route and use resources to implement the BeachwoodCanyon/Farmers Market route alternative
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
14/81
EXHIBIT E- 3 page 2 of 2)Los Feliz 2004 Performance Index of 0.54; peak vehicle: 1)
. Alternatives to lengthen route are included in new service alternativespreviously shown in Exhibit E-1
. Modification involves replacement of MT A Route 26 on Virgil
. MT A Gateway Cities Service Sector has expressed opposition to thisalternative.Beachwood Canyon 2004 Performance Index of 0.40: peak vehicle: 1)
. Seek MTA approval to include service in the Formula Allocation Programfor regional subsidies
. Alternatives to combine with other routes and to serve new locations wereevaluated but do little to improve performance with one possibleexception:-- Restructure Beachwood Fairfax and Hollywood/West Hollywoodservices into a new Beachwood Canyon/Farmers Market route-- Currently, these three services require 9 peak vehicles compared to 5for the new alternative-- Predicted Performance Index of 0.80
. Cancel route if the above alternatives are not feasible or fail to improveperformanceWarner Center 2004 Performance Index of 0.04: mid-day off-peak vehicle 1)
. Various route alternatives are included in the routes evaluatedAttachment II), with one of the options showing some promise aspreviously listed in Exhibit E-1
. Seek MTA funding for expansion to feed the new Orange Line and fareintegration
. Seek funding from the Warner Center TMO / Trust Fund
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
15/81
ATTACHMENT I
Individual Route Maps of the Recommended Routesin rank order - 20 maps)
TT CHMENT I
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
16/81
iIU,j".c-~I\\r\rI"\/
:
i"
..
F
.n__.-__n_"_."."""-_.J4C1J1-=
.
1.i\yHa-
.cCe
~ ~ ~
._
-~~
---
--
--0-n~VW~N
) _L
iIi~-~H
=I~D
1,
-__-
1I--.~".-II-C~
Fc ~
i
~' ,,iB -~~~
IE-
I
"O
.
,.n.
s
~_
lu
__e ~: ~~_
mT-
B~===
I
c___
;
1we l : ~
-
if
-TIrM :cYE-~--
~
i
:
-T_-__+
-~_HYWO
C T
,_m
I ,
.~i~=~+
"
-0Wu
I
,~
\ "unc
~=
, JJJn~
__m
\
.
-_-
-
-
'm
-
lM
A
r
,
"
-~
I
-
__
_
VnN-Whse
Re
VNWhs
C
Dsc
2
C
In
12
TaDc
Y
PecePom
15
OWaReMe
66
PVce
4
. --__ ."Sms
DLACyB
y
-
MoSao
MoGeLn
MoBuLn
MoRLn
MoGdLn
MoOaLn
MonLn
(1
. . . .pa
S SCe
PcFy
(BMonSao
~
1
DaSc
LAMASC
USC
2
TmBohsM
DePee
Mc2
05
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
17/81
(~
l;:,,---,/'
:_1I
SmSFn
Re
SmSFn
C
Dsc
7
CommunityDASHPotentialIn
12
TaDc
N
PecePm
15
OWaReMe
88
PVce
4
Sms
i--LACityBoundary
-FeaturedRoute
.Hospital
.ShoppingCenter
.School/College
.PublicFacility
f1MetroStation
-MetroGreenLine
-MetroBlueLine
-MetroRedLine
~MetroGoldLine
-MetroOrangeLine
~MetrolinkLine
(BMeonSao
~MetrolinkLine
DaSc
LA
MSG
uSC
2
TmBohsM
DePee
Mc2
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
18/81
EgeRkGaePk
r~\_
lMf
_
~
CO
-
EgeRkGaePk
Re
EeR
GlassenPark
CouncilDistrct
111
CommunitDASHPotential
In
12
TaDc
N
PecePn
14
OWaReMe
79
PVce
4
,
.Sms
DLACyB
y
~MeoSao
-ueRe
MoGeLn
.pa
MoBuLn
.hoppingCenter
MoRLn
.Ue
MetrGoldLine
.cFy
MetrOrangeLine
MetrlinkLine
0MonSao
MeonLn
DaSc
LAOTMTASCAG
USC
2
TmBohsM
DePee
Mc2
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
19/81
~ ~-=~J~~~
i
t=-1
-_____1
~__
zo: i
-w
-
-_____
'-____
==,__ .
JI
._~
~~
-
-1
.__""""~- l-
_
E
.
-
_mMaAs
-~
__~
I
- - =
I
i
~""
.,~M~
f-""I"~V
''-"-
'-/~L"
i"~\~
~-"~"-
Z1"-~",
/""r-
L--",-"~,
j--Y-
/-"-"1~
0\
-
-____
,-~-f,
o
-
~_~--m
-____
NhUvsyPk
Re
NhUvvPk
C
Dsc
89
C
In
11
TaDc
N
PecePm
18
OWaReMe
46
PVce
3
Sms
DLACyB
y
-
~MoSao
M MeoBun
M M M Monn
. . . .pa
SnCe
SCe
PcFy
IBMonSao
Monn
DaSc
LA
MSG
uSCu2
TmBohsM
DePee
Mac2
05
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
20/81
/
D /"/
/ /y
-SPo-7hSre
A
W~___1
f rn ~
\--_
fn~___
.1-1,~E~~
.,u~~c-=J&
J ~=~1=~i~~+
i~-"-(-
o-~rH
~-'-"
r -~
\L.L,L",7---~-_
.
,,"_-"""-H
\\' ' ~
~-"""
""""""""""
"
.10
___
__
"_1__
"1
"
-
'.,LJ--H-L-om,--J
/v
\
i t\ 1 .y \ \ i i \, \
\/~i i
\
SPo-7hSre
A Re
SPo7hSe
Aenv2
C
Dsc
1
C
In
11
TaDc
Y
PecePom
11
OWaReMe
40
PVce
2
Sms
-
~MoSao
MoGeLn
MoBuLn
MoRLn
MoGdLn
MoOaLn
MonLn
. . . .pa
S SCe
PcFy
0MonSao
~
\DaSc
L
MS
USC
2
TmBohsM
DePee
Mc2
\ ,
02
05
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
21/81l"A"--(
~SVeCrcuao""V
~~~--~~))~
~-~"--""V)1(
'-~-~?-
:~ '~'1-")."
,";"x
.
~TT~
~
\-"~ -~
JF
I~n_
,~
~ ~~3
\J \ / 1 f I~
~- lf I(~-~." Jl~T ~L_ i ~0
i
o~1
0
i -_ - z ~z. o- wc : :
r-L
-~
-__
H~- '-~~-_ i
- _- ,o
: : ( cw" z :
-_ ,-,. i
-~__-
~_-
VWE
~~"/"D-
"J")
l .~Y///~~
~X--=
/~,-Vj
.r
; .ir-IT:
i~
i~-__---~~-
L
i
__T1~~ii~iiI
-:I
- -.-MCeo"I..II
. ~IS
J
: i- , ~i i "~
1__
~VWE
SVeyCrcuao
Re
SVeCcao
C
Dsc
6
Cm
yDPean
11
TaDc
N
PecePm
12
OWaReMe
73
PVce
4
-_Sms
L -
~ -
MoBuLn
MoRLn
~
MoOaLn
=
. . . .
(BMonSao
=
DaSc
L
MS
u TmBohsM
DePee
Mc2
02
05
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
22/81
/tt'fJ.
-~-~-
Hyw-LFz.r)~1I
'-V'\Jt . j-
/~ / i" ) r
wi
-
~
."-z .i~
Hyw-LFz
Re
HvwLFz
C
Dsc
41
Cm
yDPeaSe
11
TaSy
Lw
PeceP
10
OWaReMe
18
PVce
6
Sms
DLACyB
y
-FeaturedRoute
~MeoSao
MoGeLn
MoBuLn
MoRLn
MoGdLn
MoOaLn
MeonLn
. . . .pa
SnCe
SCe
PcFy
(8MonSao
MeonLn
DaSc
L
MS
USC
2
TmBohsM
DePee
Mac2
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
23/811-=__Y__L_LT
tWeWas-Aenv2-~--
"U"~--=-
I~~~
~5-T~e=r~~~-~-"r~~E-I~=+
Irrc1tf-n--=-1~~=
L
L--IT~--==---~=
~~=rT=J~)c~=--~-~~-1-
-1
- ~r~il=~~~:I;r~ir~cir~-=S~
- -Y1PTH\Li"-e~-
n
i-~~o=-~:~~
J-
-
=~01EJ~--._-iiN
-L-~is1SH-iIii
i~-p~LG-Y
i
\
~=-+\-
i
-~-~~IIr-~~=~=F
--~-=JT
-==-+=
-I-----r-
-
--
I1 ~--
._-
'
._
-1R -
'-
-
,GmN-~-
i i
.
.
:
c
-__-
WeWas
A Re
WeWa
Aenv2
C
Dsc
1
Cm
yDPean
10
TaDc
N
PecePom
12
OWaReMe
74
P
4
_
Sms
DLACyB
y
- . . . . DaSc
LA
MSG
USC
2
TmBohsM
_
~
M MoBun
M M M
~Monn
0MonSao
~Monn
DePee
Mc2
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
24/81
SmAea
Re
SmAea
C
Dsc
7
CommunityDASHPotentialIn
10
TaDc
N
PecePom
13
OWaReMe
51
PVce
3
Sms
DLACyB
y
FeaturedRoute
aiMetroSlaUon
MoGeLn
MoBuLn
MoRLn
MoGdLn
MoOaLn
=MetrolinkLine
. . . .pa
S
nCe
S
Ce
PcFy
MonSao
=MetrolinkLine
DaSc
LA
MTASC
USC
2
TmBohsM
DePee
Mac2
02
05
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
25/81
;
PodRoHnoPk
-Aenv2
I=
~~~
-
I. "i-8
- =1~T~~
1 -
~~
-
-c=~E-c"
i
~~~ --
-____-
.-~~-~-_
o
-~O
-_Z~-
-______-_2-~
-__"__~~
-=~-~
-
_n
____
-__
~-
- c______-
-1-___-___
___
_
.___~
.___ - -
._
-_-~
-__ -_n_-+~
-
__
_
___
-
-__e
-
__
I-D=
\ , 1
=~~1
-+__
_.____
-____ ~_
-lT-+H
-L-Hi I
---
.__ ~-5 --_-1_
._-1
-_-1
F ( '-
-~~
_~_~~_
i-____
i i
i i AN
;-~
3
3
._~__~_~
'---~--"-"-~T-
I~-~__+~_~
I
n_J
\ I I
/__~ i
_
C_
_
_-__~
i I
-++
L
S
,_____
~m0--
_
;
n_
i
o t I
i
F
I-~~-+=~
~~
-
I \-H~~1
,
-
ro?~~_~~-
--H~~=-,-~
ii
II I-: 'i
- \
.
I
-i
.- -__
\
J~
PodRo
H A Re
PodRoAenv2
C
Dsc
9
C
In
10
TaDc
Y
PecePm
11
OWaReMe
57
PVce
3
Sms
o - . . . .
t
MoGeLn
MoBuLn
MoRLn
MoGdLn
MoOaLn
= 0MonSao
~
DaSc
LA
MSG
uSC
2
TmBohsM
DePee
Mac2
02
05
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
26/81
.
,
A~
/
l-
EyaVeCpePkLnonHgs
~,-~
,.....,-~o
-~D_
IV
EyaVe
CpePk
LnonHgs
-
Re
EyaVeCePk
/LnnHgs
CouncilDistrct
111
CommunitDASHPotential
In
10
TaDc
N
PecePm
11
OWaReMe
78
PVce
4
-Sms
DLACyB
y
-FeaturedRoute
. . . .pa
ShoppingCenter
SVe
PcF
DaSc
LA
MSG
USC
2
TmBohsM
MeSa
MetrGreenUne
MoBuLn
MetrRedLine
MoGdLn
MoOaLn
MetrlinkLine
0MonSao
MeonLn
DePee
Marc2005
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
27/81
.-
\
:
GaePkHgaPk
'~:~-
D~
GaePk
HganPk
Re
GaPk
HgaPk
CouncilDistrct
11
CommunityDASHPotentialIn
10
TaDc
N
PreictePerfnnance
11
OWaReMe
67
PeakVehicles
3
Sms
)
DLACyB
y
~MeSa
w.C
-ueRe
MoGeLn
f
MoBuLn
z.pa
0:.hoppingCenter
MetrRedLine
.Ue
MoGdLn
.
.cFy
MetrOrangeLine
'-
MetrlinkLine
(MetrlinkStation
MeonLn
.~R
-~
,-
,DaSc
LA
MSG
USC
2
TmBohsM
DePee
Marc25
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
28/81
i:o- .,.s ~-;:;v~~;~v~ ~ ~ ~ ;o::
Q).5: CD.. C C :: ~ ~CI C) m,gg,gQ) Q) Q): : :
Q)CQ) CD::.S: :. ~ ~ :E ::Q) 0 i. ..II C) 0 . :o g g g~ Q) tV CD: : : :
Co.. Q)' Ci ::.5 .5a :gt Q): :
-tIHII~I~ ~ ~
"GI~i: Lt 0D. :;GI .s1i ~c :)(Q)".5~CQ) Q) ~ ~:: E::t ~-~;~t;~~:'&1~-g:':;~:=~g~fo~i00 I- ii
Lci
$::oII
~ ~\ Q) .& CD"g"" ~~5~ c;=s"gC)~'~~~~:J a.Q.O=UU (lO.cD:: ~~....In- c.C) '"0: -:II 08 ~Go C/ a CD~ .c~~:1 i- :: i-
~ ~-g~nn6~.. C . 0~ :)~t:
:(ci
~
.. . .C'Vc:'Vi::o:Er-m_T- i 1-
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
29/81
Ano
5
1MAno
6
w z. : oz
Re
Ano
CouncilDistrct
1
CommunitDASHPotential
In
10
TaDc
Y
PecePo
09
OWaReMe
42
PVce
3
,i/i/I/1../
\'''''~'/f/'/
.~
g
ii/../.--'7('--'-'-;
i GaecPa
.
ILHR
.
-n_
_
-_
__
WiemTe
'.-___U-
.____
zW-1I W :
8
o oQ
.-"'-'.....,:
.___
-
.KowPa
._
w z. : oz
Sms
DLACyB
y
-FeaturedRoute
GMoSao
MetrGreenLine
MoBuLn
MetrRedLine
MetroGoldLine
MetrOrangeLine
MetrlinkLine
-_
.
. . . .pa
ShoppingCenter
SCe
PcFy
IMetrolinkStation
=-MetrolinkLine
-~_
-
-
-__
-___
DaSc
DePee
LA
MSG
Mc2
USC
2
TmBohsM
.
,
t5
i -~
_8H
ou
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
30/81
:\0'~-
~_1__n~
~-~
,/
;H
drSe
H
dISye
Re
H
dSe
C
Dsc
7
Cm
yDPean
10
TaDc
N
PecePom
07
OWaReMe
51
PVce
3
Sms
DLACyB
y
-FeaturedRoute
.Hospital
.ShoppingCenter
.School/College
.PublicFacility
iMetroStation
~MetroGreenLine
-MetroBlueLine
-MetroRedLine
=-MetroGoldLine
~MetroOrangeLine
=-MetrolinkLine
(&MeonSao
=-MetrolinkLine
DaSc
LA
MSG
u.s.Census2000,
TmBohsM
DePee
Mc2
02
05
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
31/81
;))~"--.)~-T~~o-0"J~"~
~LFz-Atenve271r1J---_
0-?wD~
r ~T7-~
_-1,7""-~""
i ~-J=-_-~-\-~~.rE?-._(h~
~--1c\V1\0
-~
~\\\~"2\\\)-
~11-~~---_-7.p-
~
- ~
,"","_HPta.~.r_(Lr~J-~~
~"Q
-d-0"7(N
f
-~~~_L.I~~"-~-"-~"-
-_-~".1,~-y1-J/J)0-":
-_r~A~
1"t~~z~
.
?~.-"-1
(i;1r
-___--L"_--r~"-(~)"
-n
.~-~~--I~-~T-~-_-~IJ~~-XC7--
~"rT-~6--~("JY\y~~
."MLRO0-~-(ji\0IIil--
- -L-~(f"
-~.~1H1.--~"~J~rt~~~
, z~"cnf)-J
="~"f-~,---
~s+-V~~O~--L"-"0
j
:1II:-""1N~)
-
I1-L-+_-1,-~
I:III~iI:
3RO~--7-1
-f.
-:\ , .
,
\
iI
i1L_111-/)--,--
S-
~
a00~-
z
zoI .ii '-T
, ~1
T
.
WILHR
'/m
LFz-Aenv2
Re
LFzAenv2
C
Dsc
41
Cm
yDPeaSe
09
TaSy
Mum
P
09
OWaReMe
58
PVce
2
Sms
DLACyB
y
-
~MoSao
MoGeLn
MoBuLn
MoRLn
MoGdLn
MoOaLn
MonLn
. . . .paSnCe
SCe
PcFy
( =
DaSc
LA
MSG
uSC
2
TmBohsM
DePee
Mc2
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
32/81
.PmRso
Re
PmRo
Aenv2
C
Dsc
1
CommunityDASHPotentialIn
09
TaDc
N
PecePom
11
OWaReMe
68
PVce
4
Sms
DLACyB
y
-FeaturedRoute
~MoSao
MoGeLn
MoBuLn
MoRLn
MoGdLn
MoOaLn
MeonLn
pa
SnCe
S
Ce
PcFy
0MonSao
=-MetrolinkLine
DaSc
LA
MTASC
u.s.Census2000
TmBohnM
DePee
Mac2
02
05
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
33/81
W
. //
0o -0 t? z-0Do-c
T Pa
L
.
VC
iE
.V
-0 t? oz-0oEWIN
Pom
a
W
.
O
~__-
-
~_-, f~-
--WanPa
r
r ~
i
I__
__L_
_~
.______
r
r_~_
-~~_L~-
f -V_
-
--~((-_7
'\_
-~-"-7~L~
-
, i\
--
~-\i
Pec2e_J
"-___
, \
-__.-__
'~_r,~C~~~
-_HgSh/
.-_-_Z
.
/"ff,
:Ks
F
o/HPa
~_
/WanCne
A Re
WanCeAenv2
C
Dsc
3
C
In
09
TaDc
Y
PecePom
08
OWaReMe
62
PVce
4
Sms
o - . . . .pa
SnCe
SCe
PcFy
DaSc
LA
MSG
u TmBohsM
~MoSao
MoGeLn
MoBuLn
MoRLn
MoGdLn
MoOaLn
MonLn
(BMonSao
= DePee
Mc2
02
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
34/81
-__
-__
HbCy-_
-1_
-
____
~
Df
.
H__
2R
' ocw
--
zo: c ~
C
-
_ 2
~)
- --~=
- iT-~~~~~~~
~
, -_1z .~1 ~-~__
c .0a c ' :
-
_
'-
.
.
-_
_u_
-
t_
.-__
_
_~n_
-__-
~
.___
z ~-1uwu_ : ew
-_1_
--____n
un : Z ~
I
rPACC
-~~_
__~_ ~._
_-_-__
-_u
--___
___-
'-
__-u_
HbCty
Re
H
C
1
C
In
09
TaDc
N
PecePn
08
OWaReMe
60
PVce
4
Sms
DLACyB
y
-
~MeSao
M MoBuLn
M M MoOaLn
MeonLn
. . . .pa
S SVe
PcF
0MonSao
=
DaSc
LA
MSG
uSC
2
TmBohsM
DePee
Mac2
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
35/81
NhHywCrcuao
iII
-T-LIVANOWEII,
VcoyPa
VWE
-___
-
VC \ ~
._~__~___
--
~--
-~~__
z z ( ~ :5
-_L. I
Ceo
NrO"lOOd
-_______~
'B
IM o : wz 5 C\ i
'-NhHyw
Crcuao
Re
NhHyw
Ccao
C
Dsc
26
CommunityDASHPotentialIn
09
TaDc
Y
PecePom
07
OWaReMe
63
PVce
4
Sms
DLCyB
y
-FeaturedRoute
~MoSao
MoGeLn
MoBuLn
MoRLn
MoGdLn
MoOaLn
MonLn
. . . .pa
ShoppingCenter
SCe
PcFy
(BMonSao
=-MetrolinkLine
DaSc
LDMASC
u.s.Census2000,
TmBohsM
DePee
Mc2
05
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
36/81
ATTACHMENT II
List of Route Proposals valuated
in alphabetical order - 85 route proposals)
ATTACHMENT II
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
37/81
Aam
P1o7
C
TDR
EU
Cmy
C
Re
DH
Ta
PredictedP
OWa
P
Cms
Dsc
Pea
Sy
ReMeVce
Se
7
AeaPmCrcao
09Hg
09
89
5PeaaenvohVNLeC
oepo
1
Ano
10Mum
09
41
3Rnoeooaoaos
45
BwC
By
08Mum
06
74
5FsCyceapecePom
n
07
Ce
45
BwC
Fms
08Hg
08
74
5R
cnaoooeanHyw
WeHywoem
Mk
bmemeosdhoeanpo
4
BwC
Lcm
08Mum
05
49
3FsCyceapecePom
n
07
4
BwC
Wisre
07Hg
06
57
4FsCyceapecePom
n
07
Ce
1
BeHgsRwSe
08Hg
05
57
4FsCyceapecePom
n
07
31
CswhWanCe
11Mum
12
93
6Nem
bMobpcdodcooesnsvc
CePkLnnHgs
Nwaenvoaeoaopoemoeeh5mem
1
11Mum
12
38
2bosdcooMRe4a2aenvdon
Aenv2
re
oP2PcMn
1
CePkLnnHgs
11Mum
12
48
3Oaopoemoeeh5membos
111
EeRGaPk
12Mum
14
78
4Rnmsereoseoao
41
EPkBePk
08Hg
09
50
3RnmdoboP2PcMn
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
38/81
Aame
P
2o7
CMMUTD
RU
EU
Cmy
C
Re
DH
Ta
PredictedPI
OWa
P
Cms
Dsc
Pea
Sy
ReMieVce
Se
1
EyaVeAweVa
08Hg
07
46
3Reeh5miemabos
11
EyaVeCe
09Mum
09
12
6Rnmedob
oP
2PcMen
PkHgaPkA
4
11
EyaVeCe
09Mum
09
13
7Rnmedob
oP
2PcMenoesoo
PkHgaPkA
5
1me
111
EyaVeCePkLnn
10Mum
11
78
4Rnmedob
oP
2PcMen
Hgs
111
EyaVeGla
PkCe
09Hg
09
70
4Rnmedob
oP
2PcMen
PkL
11
EyaVeNhL
10Mum
10
13
5Rnmecdeb
oP
2PcMen
Ae
45
Fairfax
Alternative1
06Hg
04
75
5FsCyceapecePomInc07
45
FaLBe
07Hg
05
15
7FsCyceapecePoma
nc07oeere6
vce
45
FaMdCy
06Hg
07
66
4Rnmedob
oP
2PcMen
1
HbCy
09Mum
08
59
4DcooGadRe2mabas
11
HgaPkGla
Pk
10Hg
11
66
3Rnmedob
oP
2PcMen
11HgaPkMoeeHsGod
09Mum
08
37
2Resosc5mieereaeneaowhMT
LnC
o
1
HgaPkLnnHgsL
10Mum
10
55
3Rnmecdeb
oP
2PcMen
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
39/81
Aam
P3o7
C
TDR
EU
Cmy
C
Re
DH
Ta
PredictedP
OWa
P
Cms
Dsc
Pea
Sy
ReMeVce
Se
45
Hyw
W.Hywva
07Hg
05
60
5FsCyceapecePomInc07
Hyw
45
Hyw
W.Hywva
07Hg
05
61
5FsCyceapecePomInc07
S
41
HywLFz
11Lw
10
17
6E
ooesnoeern2aovceoembo
lo RnmdoboP2PcMnoesoo~
41
HywSvL
09Mum
09
15
81mee
ooesnoeern4aovceoe
rere~6vce
7
HdSe
10Hg
11
50
3RamSvcpooMRe2
Nn
yLFzAenv2hahganmco
41
LFz-Aenv1
09Hg
09
36
2invsvceamoMRe2oVrgMGewCe
SvcSoheeo
oohsaenv
M
cooesnsvcnvneamsvcoMRe
41
LFzAenv2
09Mum
09
57
22oVrgMGewCeSvcSoheeo
oo
thsaenv
1
Mdow-Aenv1
09Hg
09
86
3Epmnambmemeosdhroeranpo
11MWahno-Aenv1
10Mum
10
60
4RamSvcpooMARe1
11MWanoAenv2
09Hg
09
69
4RamSvcpooMARe1
11MWanoAenv3
10Mum
10
73
4RamSvcpooMARe1
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
40/81
Aame
P
4o7
CMMUTD
RU
EU
Cmy
C
Re
DH
Ta
OWa
P
Dsc
Pea
SyPecePReMieVce
Cms
Se
26
N
SVe
12Lw
11
12
6RnmesereoseoaoswoeNhHyw
CrcaoaSVeCrcaoaenvwh4vcepoe
26
NhHyw-Aenv1
09Lw
04
59
4FsCyceapecePoma
n
07
26
NhHyw
Aenv2
09Lw
07
18
6SseoeaenvsaN
SVeahNh
Hyw
Crcao
26
NhHyw
Crcao
09Mum
07
62
4RnmeohN
SVeaenvoceewsaeoe
89
NhUvyPk
11Hg
18
46
3Reeh5miemabos
1
Nh
LAe
11Mum
11
61
4Reaenvs
enP
2PcMensoaoymoe
ece
31
Nhd-Aenv1
09Mum
08
18
6OraLnF
o
uynemme
bMTobpcd
todcooesnsvcoesoo1mie
31
Nhd-Aenv2
11Mum
13
17
6Nemme
bMTobpcdodcooesnsvc
Rnmesereoseoaocdoeaenv
1
PmsCvCy
11Mum
12
67
4s
enP
2PcMencdaenvwhnhCyo
LAe
1
PmsR
s
Aenv2
09Hg
11
68
4Rnmecdeb
oP
2P
cMensey
c
daoaCyoLAeaeb
e
9PoDRoHnoPk
12Mum
13
66
4E
ooesnoeern3aovcesse
Alternative
aenvwhnhCyoLAe
9
PodRoAenv2
10Mum
11
56
3E
ooesnoeern2aovceenmeo
remonCyoLAesmeoognpo
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
41/81
Aame
P
5o7
CMMUTD
RU
EU
Cmy
C
Re
DH
Ta
PredictedPI
OWa
P
Cms
Dsc
Pea
Sy
ReMieVce
Se
2
RvdSe
07Hg
02
87
5FsCyceapecePoma
n
07
1
SPo2
11Lw
09
52
2No
n
ygvmpopomaoesnoe
1
SPoA
11Lw
10
44
2No
n
ygvmpopomaoesnoe
1
SanPedroB
11Lw
08
49
2No
n
ygvmpopomaoesnoe
1
SPoC
09Lw
04
33
2FsCyceapecePoma
n
07
1
SPoD
09Lw
07
48
2No
n
ygvmpopomaoesnoe
1
SPo7hSe
10Mum
09
44
2RameSvcpooMTRe5o7hSe
Alternative
1
SPo7hSe
11Lw
11
40
2Reeh5miemabos
RameSvcpoo
Aenv2
MTRe5o7hSe
1
SPoHbVaCe
10Lw
08
42
2No
n
ygvmpopomaoesnoe
41
SvL-Aenv1
08Hg
07
13
7Rnmesereooaoaosoeere6vce
41SvLShAenv2
09Mum
07
54
3Aenveueahe
oC
OfcJ0
41
SvLBePk
08Hg
08
78
4Rnmedob
oP
2PcMen
25
SuoCy
09Mum
08
95
4Eooesnoenpo
vSuoCysmeern1
aovce
24
SuoCyNhHyw
10Hg
11
34
2Rcnaenmeoesnoeb
oP
1aP
2
PcMn
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
42/81
Aam
P6o7
C
TDR
EU
Cmy
C
Re
DH
Ta
PredictedPI
OWa
P
Cms
Dsc
Pea
Sy
ReMeVce
Se
6
SVe
10Hg
12
66
4Nn
yhNSVeoeowoeaenvae
imeme
6
SVeCrcao
11Mum
12
72
4RnmohNSVeaenvoceewsaeoe
7
SmSFn
12Mum
15
88
4Oaorenmsreefoseyavceshw
7
SmCrcao
09Hg
06
74
4FsCyceapecePom
n
07
7
Sylmarlrleta
10Hg
13
51
3PaaenvohVNLeC
oewcsoo
7
SmSFn
09Mum
10
14
6RnmohVNLeC
roe
Aenv2
45TGoLcmWeen
07Mum
05
79
5FsCyceapecePom
n
07
31
TopangaCanyon
09Mum
04
62
4FsCyceapecePom
n
07
25
VN-Aenv1
11Lw
10
86
4E
ooesnoeeunnpovSuoCysm
ren1aovce
25VNHnAenv3
06Mum
04
45
2FsCyceapecePom
n
07
26
VNwKe
09Lw
07
59
3R
cnaenmoesnoeboP1aP2
Aenv2
PcMn
25
VNeWhs
12Mum
15
65
4Aenvdone
oP2PcMn
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
43/81
Aam
P7o7
C
TDR
EU
Cmy
C
Re
DH
Ta
PredictedPI
OWa
P
Cms
Dsc
Pea
Sy
ReMeVce
Se
7
VNILeC
10Hg
11
18
1Resoo1meSmSaAeaPmroepod
thsmcaoeere6vce
7
VNBvL
10Hg
11
45
3Nem
bpcdodcooMsvcoVN
Bv
1
Vc
06Hg
05
42
3FsCyceapecePom
n
07
3
WanCeAenv1
07Mum
04
58
3FsCyceapecePom
n
07
3
WanCeAenv2
09Mum
08
61
4RnmoAenv1boaysofuuedom
3
WanCeCa
05Hg
00
62
4FsCyceapecePom
n
07
3
WanCeMha
08Mum
07
19
9Resoo1meRamSvcMRe2oe
requires:.6vehicles
3
WanCeIPecCe
09Lw
08
47
3RouteproposedbyMTAstaffaspartofBusRail
IneaPaoh
OaLn
1
WeWasAenv1
11Mum
12
58
4RnmdoboP
2PcMn
1
WeWasAenv2
10Mum
12
74
4RnmdoboP2PcMn
1
WimnoIHbCe
12Lw
14
61
4Rcnaenmoesnsvcmbmemeosd
thoeanpo
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
44/81
TT CHMENT III
Community D SH Transit Need ssessment StudySummary Report Findings Rankings
TT CHMENT III
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
45/81
COMMUNITYDATRANSIT
NDA
MENSU
EuvSmy
FnnR
n
R
oh
CtyoLA
e
TapaoCmmite
LAX
ITRANSPORTATION
MA
MEN
IIII&DESIGN,INC.
CTYOFLOSANGEE
D
RMEOFTA
ORTON Ma
ch22
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
46/81
-tnCI==.-~catn c:- -CI CI.- ~- -CI .. - c((. (. ca oo..- ca m c: 0~ 0 ~ ~ 0CI - :: .- C)
c. c. ~ c:U) tn (.C. c: .-c: .- .J:: c( - -c(. 0 CI c:U) .- ca~ .- ~ -c( - .- ii a:c -cC tn :: c: CI ~~ ca ii 0 (.In ~ 0 ~ 0 c: c:- C) ca 0. c: C) E .-c: :: - ~ tn.- c: caE (. (. - ~CD .- 0 :: .-CI c: ~ -c. E tn t -1I :: ca CIc: 0 .-0 - 0 )( CI == - 111111 1o 0 ii 0 w ii w 0 t III-fo I --. . . . . . . . I r11111. ~iiiiiii ~
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
47/81
CmmuyDHSvcDnd
.Cmmutybexeroeshesevce
oann2commuteopod
.Aeocommutynghavtycees
.
.aeeoveoh2CmmutyDH
roe.maoyoroeoanevy2mine
.Taearoeehsveoegmie
bhaearpsehomie
s=.-MonSAeFwd
2
I
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
48/81
CmmuyDHSvcDnd
.CmtyDHroemseverasao
ifpoaadcomtybesevce
.Wedphoyraesevcedn
mhCmtyDHsevcepoe
.Deomoraesevcembme
aoaeoMAOao
.CmtyDHroeshdndcae
MAoohmcpoaosevce
.CmtyDHroecareaesh
.rapaosevce
= MnLAeFwd
3
I
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
49/81
StuoAys
.TLADOTueC
aoeGudnoeaue
aCtyratsevce
.Annualevaluationsareconductedbasedonperformance
r
knohencaos
.PassengersPerHour
.SubsidyPerPassengerMile
.OperatingRatio
.Rewhacomescoeu07aecasfeda
Magn
.Routesbelow0.50areconsideredPoor-Performingand
aesueocaeaofpomaednmpoe
.GuidelinesforestablishingnewDASHserviceconsider
faossuhanapoeerdshp
.TLADOTsnhpmaypodoratsevceo
Ctyreds
.Amapofperformance,basedon2003data,follows
-_--..-----
-_---
---.---
_-----~-
MonLAeFwd
4
I
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
50/81
/myD
o iJPMm~
l ILUod
~ ~ ~S
CT
lHymJea
ih~~m11~H
IMWIIP
i l lLeSn
IWICe1
iV
oeoT
fGKnF1uUCy
iL1uH
I. ifadno
S1Pu
ra
Lh
AhwC
. .DQLHV
.W-TrCn
. . ~~ ~VHdU1
,~A3Dn~
4
.1~1yV
~ : U8
S
RN
1H1 11
1 1 1
5 i 7 i R 'u I ,~ 1 ,'" ,U 1H 1U 1 UU 0 U "A UU n7 01 0 U 0 U
I ' 1 1 1 1U 2 'J
n
nu~-40 0 Nw
Svc
tUHLUy
BmdP1~
- ~)M1dWI
: : G11r~A
_1AoU1VmYJJ
1SJcH
MMoR
-~L- ~ - .
.qAn
c
DoL)OMnn(1
uCTTm"B
.euUG
h~Mp
0
iM .
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
51/81
tn-caoC)~(.CD.~o..D.
CD ~.~ 0) ~.. c: tn.- c:. s- cuo 0 s-- tJ.. ... CD tn -c.U) ~.s'~ ~ :8~ CD tT .-C) tJ f :g.2:: ~ cuo en c: 32i:.A cu ~o ~ E J: C 0) .. .. tnG) .c.. tnE.~ 0) . ~.. .. 0)cu .-.= o~o E cu .: ~.. E ~ 0- .-a 0 0) .. ~~ 0 0cu- 0 .. tn .. 0):~b~~E~ ~ ~.~ ~ 8ca i: .. m .~ ~c. CD ):: :: tn.2 tJo .u) ~ s-gtn "" tn ~D c. c: c w ..~ e. .C c..
o..tJCDL.~tJ Ica ~~ .2- i:a c:c caCD -E ~D .~ tJ- t:' CD-g caE ~ca 0C L.J 0 C)S c..5- .- ..
.. J: tJg ~ ')(i: CD CDc i: C)CD .t: c ~ 'o e 0U c.t~.5 &.
Eo..enc::s tnS- 0)o c:(J =(J 0)cu '~ .~~C)cu 0)~ (J: c:c: cucu E' s-O) 0~ 't: 0)E c."' ~c: tncu c:' E0) l-..cu '~ 0)~cu 0~ s-O) 0-0) 0-s- cucu -tn .-0) (J.. c:~ ~o 0~u.
U)
11111 L. 1111 ~. III ~Iii' ~inu i ~IIIIIII j
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
52/81
l/..~--caI...l/~ooC)~--"~::LL
tn s..- .pCI tn.~ -c~ c:CI ~tn c:l- c:o 0c .-c: ~.. tn~ 8-CI 0c: s.~ a. tnc: CI c:CI - 0E .c .-a ~CI == ca- ca s.c. :: CIEcaC..- ~ 0o .c C)~ c:~ -c .-~ .., 0- \I PP- ~ WI_.- ..cEc:c: == 0.
tn-cc:~'Ica-~Es.o'I- c:ca l-5 :E.. CI.- .tc ~-c .tca ~C) .-c: ~.S; -c.- CICI tn(. tn ~'I (.no .-c: -co C).. c:c. .-o~.
tn iiI ~:; C) iio .= ~s.~ 0~ ~ ii gCI CI CD 0c: c. c. ..- 0 0 gca ~ Co ('c: tn 0 ~Os. It ..- ca ~ 0~ CI ~ CD-c~ CD -0-c c: 10 :Eca CI E CDCI ~ .;( ~.~ )( e ~I CI c. c.o c: g. . - CI .. 0;.t 0 (Jc: ~ .. (i9 ~ ~:: (J cotn 0 -- C) (JCI ~ - c: CDtn CI c:;; C)ca-co E E(. . - CD tn CD~~~ c.~~tn ~ c: o~ c:CI~~. .00'1.
-
to
1~lIl 1t 111 ~, I ~ ri111m: l1.11.11 ~
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
53/81
PoeAoh
C
LPUCINU
ESNC
TOBE
.Pome
.Id
Rkn
C
Oce
In Pc
Mn
WePn
Tan
Rruun
Sue
LSTO
C
DRO
EUOA
R
NO
AR
V
..
..
--.----
=i=~=
-_-
MnLAeFwd
8
POM
PCO
CQmmuy
DH
Poman
CmmuyDf
Pea
Inx
I
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
54/81
C
Pcn
C
L&PUCINU
ESNC
TOBE
POM
PCO
C
Oce
L
Poman
FuGo
Tan
Cmmuy
In
.
Inx
Pc
Svc
DH
Rnn
Cmmen
Sy
Poman
Pc
I
i
Mn
. .
WePn
CcBes
CmtyDH
Tan
Ays
Pean
Rruun
. .
Sue
,LSTO
L
C
D
-
.
.
RO"
EUOA
R
NO
AT
TV 9
.-~----i=-=
._-
MnLAeFwd
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
55/81
C .Ju2
-Tw2C
SaBen
.JuyA
2-Svn(7Cm
y
Men
.NghC
saOthsdfeb
C
OcAendCm
yMen
.-EmnfcohoAePannC
san
NghC
DreMaaoEma
-Tep(4csfo1coas
-
.GoeneBdMen
-------=- MonLA
eFwd
1
I
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
56/81
C .CmsWith5WrteS
oReve
..Te3CmtyGo
..
NwSvceaoC
oEsn
CmmuyDHSvc
.Nem
2-Tw2C
SaBen
RgdnPcPcpoRusan
PmePecoMho
=----- MnLAeFwd
1
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
57/81
NCIl/co.ca.
i..::C.c:-(.---.c::ii~--(.c:::oo
tnCICJ.-..oZc-..CICI:Ell.ECIcaD..cCI~..CJCI. ..ollD.CIJ:....oCI tntn ..~ ;"C ECI E~ 0; 0C "Co Co ca.
mc:.-"C'-comCI'-en..c:CIEEoU
"Cc:COenc: "C.2 CI.. "Cen .-CI ::m 0m '-~ a.en CI
;: ;CI ;:c: eno CIIt U~.~CI CI10 enE "C.- CI)( eno 0'- a.a. 0a. '-c: a..
"CCcatnc-..CICI:E~..-c~EE tno o .=...- CICD CI~:E.- lltn 0I 0it CIo tno CIN CJ~.~CIll tn.c CCCI l-u. :Eof .-
~~ca CI~ CIC llca J:., l-.
en ..= en -- "CU m CI CIc: c: en "C~.- co .-o ; .. ~ c:U CI a. '- 0"C:E E a.;;ON 0 ClCOo CI '- ;-=ten; ;:~o CO CI en CI.c.. c: .. '-.. a. '- c: 0m "C CO CI "l.- CI CI E en~ "C .. E CIm c: en o.~CI c: ",...::: 0 - COcc: ~-gECI .. CI CO 2en --.. -CI CI "C en COo.~ CI 52CI.. "C ;; ~r: a. ~ en 0- CI '-t. : g m-c:"" - mCOo - ~ c:en.~ 5 en.2'- "I ..1;; ;; It.-a. c: CO 00 "Co CI .~ ~ ~00 "C ~- .. 2 It-- en 0 CO NC:'-z Emco ~ m.- c:.... c: )(.-:: 0 .- 0 "C- ; 0.-=o-g CI a.U:E co :E c: . :. . .
tn~ ca .=.. ~tn CCI = caJ: CJ 0:.. C ..o ~ ~.. 0 tncO o.-c- N .-.. --"Cca C.. 0 .-c ~ u.= l- ~e "C caD. c ca .-I CI Eit CI =o .. CIo : llNED.~ E ggca 0 .-~ O"Cll C ca.c 0 CI .- CIu. 1 0:of ~ tn~o
c. cca tn .-~ C ..C ca .ca ll ll.,l-a:.
II
N--
111111 1t 111' ~iii1 ~, ..'U' n: .1111111 i
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
58/81
EsnCtoBes
C
L&PUCINU
ESNC
TOBE
POM
PCO
Tan
Rruun
Sue
Tan
Svc
Sy
Cmmuy
DH
Pnman
C
Oce
In Pc
Mn
WePn
CmtyDH
Pea
Inx
LSTO
C
DRO
EUOA
R
NO
AR
V
I=~-~~----
l=---
i-=-..-=
MnLAeFwd
1
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
59/81
lnL-ei.-L-L-eam~lnc:o-..--cc:ooC)c:.-..ln.-)(w
enc-ucQ)~-clI'-o..ucaLL. .lI.-lI~ca Q)c uc( ca~ EQ) '-.- 01: 'tca Q)m ii.
'(1+'(J(1-(1UJc:o~c:o~'c:(1IIII~UicI-:E.c+'.-~c:o
Q): rol- t:E~o ~ ~l- ~ .-0: +'- COs. 0 IIQ) c: (1E Q) c.. s. 0g~ \le w 00 0 c:Q) c: 0a. ro c: ~ .-ro .: ;:CJ ro 0~ a. II.N 0 a.Q) .. +'LL ~(J w 0O -- .c: +'.. 0 .- c: ~o :J (1~o) (J: Q) .-(30. :0 0 Q) (1o c: 0 UJo ro ~ ..~_c: 0-5~~ IIro 5 c: (1Q) 0 0 .. tnco 0: 9~ tn 'c: c:E ~I- LL.
.-+'coIIC)(1+' ..c: tn- (1~ ~co 0LL a:.
-tn(1.~ tn: 0(1 +'UJ ~C) LL.= (J+' .-(1 .cc. c.E Eo C)U 0' Ec: (1co C.c '+' c:C) coc: (1(1 tn.. :J(1+' '~ c:o coa: ... .
oo--
11111 1t IIllt ~iii l -jIiun: ~iiiidt f
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
60/81
lns.CD.-s.s.COm
o
lnc:o-..--cc:ooC)c:.-..ln.-)(w
Cl"lao--"0CD~oI-ClE
..~aaC'tn c(I T" .. ('.. (0 ~ a:: a a aa C'o .8 C' ci: "0 . C CDCD a I-C) C (0 8s: a en.- CD 0 aE ~ ; ~~ a CD -o a ~ "C't C' e 0Cl 0(I CD .E ~D. 0 (' ~.. a -" en a -i: l C' 0o ~ .c ::o - ~ 1D. 0 0 Q)-c2~~s: ei ~ "Cns "C a 0- 0e.2=~s: .c 't ~ ...- Q) = ~C)~OO~ D. LL :: ~~ . . ..
~ ~0~ 0C N- ..a ~ -c~ 8a C' 0 s:.. .8 C .. ns~"O~eM~ .~ ~ .= gC ~ .8 C)N~ "0 "0 ~ s:l (' CD nsa a .c Eo a ~~ ~ ~ Ec~80(( 0 a ~ .cCD C' -"0 en C -c (I(' ~ CD (I (.8 e. 0 == s:~c:~ons.- 0 (0 E E~ ~ a ~8 c: e. ~ 't0en CO ~ -'l (J Q) ns ~,l .. ~ ~a "C c: -- C.-OQ)tnNO (J (i..~~~...cLL 0 Q) :: ns: 0'"(/ CO m ~ c.S~~ 0(1... ~8I- ns.
..~aaC'CT"l".. a~o 0-aC' "0C ~C' eco Cla E.8 ('"0 aCD a~ C'e CCl CDE I-oM ~a l"~ ~C a- -
CD Q)I- ~o .- .cn tJT" -(0 .-8 ~o "C~ 0"" 0~ ~c: =CO 0en ::. .
-
I/--
11111 1101 ~tiil~l~iC f
I g-iiiiii i
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
61/81
22PmeEauoRuts
==..
.------_---
..
-_~-
MnLAeFwd
2
2
2
2
Cm
yDHRePom
Pom
P
SubsidyPer
Oan
P
Ro
InSeInSePH
Me
PcUoEPk
18
16
8$
01
4%
Wimno
16
15
7$
01
3%
PamCyVN
13
16
6$
02
3%
CeedSQe
13
10
6$
03
3%
ESe_CyTa
12
11
5$
02
2%
Sh
11
12
5$
03
2%
Mdow
10
10
5$
03
2%
Was
10
10
4$
03
2%
Vm
Mn
10
07
4$
04
2%
Cehw
10
10
5$
05
2%
KinaEast
09
08
4$
05
2%
HaaPkEeR
09
11
4$
03
1%
LmSa
09
09
4$
04
1%
Nhd
08
10
3$
03
1%
SanPedro
08
06
4$
06
1%
Hyw
07
07
3$
05
1%
LnnHgsCnow
07
08
3$
06
1%
WisheCe-Keow
07
08
3$
09
1%
Hvw-Wishe
07
04
3$
07
1%
VN
SuoCY
07
08
2$
05
1%
PodRo
06
06
3$
13
1%
BeHasELA2
06NotAvailable
2$
12
1%
Fa
06
05
3$
08
1%
Hyw
WeHvw
05
05
2$
08
1%
LFz
05
05
2$
12
1%
BeachwoodCanyon
04
05
2$
19
1%
WanCe
00
00
2$29
1%Aa
DyRds
17 37 50 31 33 44 16 27 24 11 22 28 19 15 13 20 30 20 8 18 3 7 13 14 2 22
Pom
seboaaanop
sphsdpp
meaoanao
P
sphoe
svcm
epovyOansdsoaoancseaee
Sdpp
mesaceevm
eubSGnhRoTa
aoPaOanao
isaeaohe
gaeomoaoegasne
dvdboancsToanao
mececeTkopom
sesswbow 1
GPm
=07
MgnPm06o05
LwPm
005
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
62/81
l/G)..~oD:c:--..l/-)(w..oU.l/G)--G)..ca....tJ..c:G)EG)::o..c.E-
~~co.o-o-0:-G)-co.cG):1D..
Q)(..-t=Q)tI~Q)c:c:.- C c:Q) 0 C ~.:: CO- ~(. mc: Q). - ..tI .=.-Q) Q).. ~:: ~e tic: eQ) .:;;; e-m Q)c: ~Q) c:- 0o .-. .. ~Q) c: ~ 0.~ 0 c: C'...- c: 0co 1; 0 '-E :: (. )(Q) (i = CU~~~'t-. . ~.
Q).~ Q)
t= gQ) coti E~ ~Q) 0c: 'tc: Q).- a.C =Q) co C ~: Q)- ~(. 0.= Q)Q) ~0co c.J Ec: .-Q) 0E ..c: ~m=- .---o 0Q) C..:: ..o ::~ .cQ) .-~ c:.- 0.. .-co ..c: co~ ::Q) -.. co- ~c: Q).
-oC ti ..S .. ..
co c: .-~ Q) ~Q) "Ca..- Q)ti (.o Q) .-Q) ~ t=.. co Q):: Q) tio ~ v~ OJ ~co~co't= .. .-: ~ co.. ~ U-ti co Q)m a. ..c: ~ ...- 0 'I.. 'I 0ti.;( E ;Q) co "C~ c:Q) m.-.. 0 co.. ~ Epp a. Q)I Q) ~c: Q) ~ .-. - .."C "C Q) coc: .- .. c:co 0: .. ~a.Z'mS)( .- c: -Q) 0 .- co'I Q) (. Q)o .. ~ 'Sc: .. a. 0o ~ e ~- Q) ::.. "C "C ;:a. c: c: Q)o :: co c:.
..
lllli 1111' ~ID ~~diU. r11.2
I :r11ii1i ~
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
63/81
ImpomenSraegeFEsnRe
.HollywoodlWestHollywood(0.57)
.SeekoperatingfundsfromWestHollywood
.RailconnectionrequiresfareintegrationwiththeMTA
.Atenveroeagmesweeauebdteo
impopoman
.hrswaoaenmpemeeaodn
reutnmpoepomaehcodroe
reruun
-C
eroeauereoceompemehBhw
Hyw
FmesMakeroeatenveoohnwsevce
.LosFeliz(0.54)
.Alternativestolengthenrouteareincludedinnewservice
evuo
.SMTAaoaonusevcenhFmua
AoaoPoamoreosude
~==-..-
-.-.---
-------
--.----
~--i-~~-
MonLAeFwd
1
I
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
64/81
InCD..::o0:c:.-..In.-)(WI-oLLInCD.-
CD..nsI-..en..c:CDECD::ol-e.E-
~o~o.r:o~r:COo-coo~.r(JCOQ)m.
Q)~ i:Q) Q)E tn ~I 0 0o +JQ.LL "CEQ) c: .-.c ns 0+J tn tn +Jc:.~ Q) Q).- C +J-Q).- ~ ~o tn 0 =.-.c IIi: ~ II 0Q) tn Q)"Ctn- .c+JQ) ns 0 ~"C c: .c.c ...- +J"C- C' .- Q)o Q) 3=+Jc: II "".- Q) ,,,o II C:.=+J ~ .- ns(iEE~~ ns 0 Q)o II 0 IIII C' ""0- 0 0 ,,,0- ii +J tnns a. tn c: Q)c: c: ~.2 gI- 0 .- 1; ns:E~1;gE~oE-oQ) 0 Q) ~ ..Q) - +J ;: S-en e: e: ~ ~. .
en iiCD 0't Q)- .- -co .. .cu. CD .-;: tn"0$ ~ ns0CD co ~~c ~ O+J.. co .- CD co 0OOCDO);:o c:co -- -- --.- .c 6 .00 ~en L. .- L. 2 nsCD CD -- C CD :J "'~ . 0 ~ CD:: 0 VI-- (: i= L. "' L. c:g Q) ro . :J :; :; .2L. en ~ 0- CD CD +J 0 en ~ ceO-CD 0 L. en CD \f 0L. 0 CD CD.. 0 Q)
.8 $ E .0 ~ ~ ~ Q)en ~co (:-- 00 0
.c o : Q) .:; ~ .c i:oI"' 00 X CI CI- -- 0 CD.- CD Q) E0. en 0 CD en g .c iiCD CD :; L. L. co +J 0:: ~ ; 0 E ..x 2: = CD CD ~ s-CD "0 0 en ;: 0 Q) Q)CD 0 I CD t+ 't +J 0-.. 2 =c .. 0 CD ~ Q).- ;: 0 -- -- 0. 0 ~~ ~ 0 ~ O 0 ii 000$ c~ CD Q) ii0. I .. CO 1: .c 0-", 0 CD 0..- +J E.. "0 CO t: E "0I- c Q) :J 0 Q) i .-OCJoa: 00i I I c: +JO =(J ~.
II
111111 1tiul~~l.~11111111
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
65/81
ImpomenSraegeFEsnRe
..
eauopoewthoohooshwn
sompomse
.SMAunoepoaaeneao
.SunromhWanCeTM
.OhReWithAeaePme
.nwroesg
mkenanwbe
.HywWishre(07Rco
orereae
ineaowthhMA
.BeHgsELA(06Pmeepeo
imoeahsnwroememen2
maue
-==------
MnLAeFwd
2
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
66/81
PmePeco
C
LPUCINU
ESNC
TOBE
POM
PCO
C
Oce
In
Pnman
Inx
Rnn
FuGoPc
Cmmen
Cnuy
DH
Pman
Pc
Mn
WePn
Tan
Rruun
Sue
CcBes
Ays
CmmuyD
Pea
Inx
LSO
C
DRO
EUOA
R
NO
AR
V
-_~=-----
= MnLAeFwd
2
I
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
67/81
EauoMo
.TheoreticalModel
.Pomaesauoordshpasevceees
.Rdhpsauoosevceees
.Svceeesaeauoodmoacaub
eromechaesc
.Four-StepPredictiveModel
.Se1-PecCmmutyDHPomae.e
Pomaen
.Se2-Pecratsevceeesacompeo
exsnsevc
.Sep3Cmbnthfrstwseptoaepena
fonwep
areruueCmmutyDH
.
sevc
.Sep4Aybestopomansuan
otheroperationalfactors
-----..-
=----
===:====
-----
2
I
MogLAgeFMwd
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
68/81
AysoFosAenSe
.Rewo2VaeodfyP
mae
Pedcosamothm:
.Population
.Ethnicity
.AgeGroup
.Household
.Income/Poverty
.AutoAvailability
.Commute-to-Work
.Employment
.LandUse
.RegionalTransitServicecompetition,coordination)
==-----
-------
=-..-==
---l-~-
MonLAeFwd
2
I
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
69/81
TatSvceS
yM
.ExcludedareasCensusBlocks):Populationand
Emomdteo5oepae
.Ceeesoratsevcesuycomeo
pecesevceees
.U
suedaehvhgeenddman
.Currentlevelsofserviceinclude:
.Allmunicipalbusoperatorsallbusservicemodes)
.MetroRail
.Campusshuttles
.Predictedservicelevelafunctionof:
.Empomendnypae
.Zovecehed(pceooahed
.Pecs7ohvaaonratsevcesuywth
95kconfidence
--..-..-
==.=.---
==:1===
-----
--~~-.-
MnLAeFwd
2
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
70/81
1 ~
I i
.
.(~
~2 \,
-..-.--i
..r-~
~.
~-
rJ-"
l;...........~..
...L,'
.-
t........i
. .A.
. 1
...Ir
.
1:
~1--~~
=&--..
=_~=-=
===--==
M-onLAeFw
2
TaSvcUS
orUnmetTransitNer.upply,
eAe
RelativeTra-
PecdSvSvcSy
-cepppy.ExstingServiceSupply
USy
ExpecteSupply
OSy
ExlsbngDASHServic-MfA~eR -RedUne -BlueLine --GreenLine ::GodLine. -.-.~CraagLn
UCco
Meon DC
yoLAe
.AeSBbD
aeeCuTynowDH
omuSWd
DLAMfAT
uCLT&nM
Mi 4
I
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
71/81
-CD-co:Et:o-..(..--cCD'-a.CD(.t:caE'-~CDa.:Ienc:c~..-t:::EEoo
"Cr:lUr:o- CD.. L.lU U- lU~a. L.o CDii a... l/.- l/l/ CD~-U L.o 0m Itl/ ..0l/ l/r: .CD ::o l/-- r:l/ CDlU "CCD ..L. r:lU CD"C ECD ~C 0~-- a.~ Eww.
CD CD~ U.. r:~ lU.c EC L.= .g~ CDCD a.L. CDo ~u ..l/ ~)( r:CD lUC L.r: CD.- ~CD ..U "Cr: r:lU lUE CDL. ...g ~CD -a. ~CD CD CDC) ~ UlU = .- lU ::: ~ CDlU r: l/~" r: ..~ lU .-~ 0 l/. r:l/ .. lU.. l- L..~ 0 =-ggeL. .. ..ii~o.
CD)( UI r:"' CD~ "C-CI ..l/ r: . 8E.g ~.: Itt lU )CI:: ~. ..CI CD .-u ~r: - r:lU ~ -0== E i - CI .-m CI L. Ci == tn tn SCI 0 0 .. 0 "' :: .-.1.- 't ~ c." "' .. ~ CD .1 r: ..CI CI ii ~.~ CI ~ ".. tn '" tn CD C ~tn::' U. ~ CD tn 5 0 .. r:'t A 1: .co tn .1 r: lUVL...- .. "I CI ECI C "C :, CI 0 0 L.o~ CD ~c... ~ 0.... L. .. "I r: 't"'.t: ii 0 CI .. CD~::J: ~c ~ CI a. E en "' CI tn...- E c( .. ~ .. :: 0~ 0 C r: CI ~ ~ ..0"' 0 CI C. 0 .. 0""~E~r.~)~ '.- ~ ~ CI - It; CI r: 0 t: "' 0 l/"'"" ~ C. ~ .s ~ 1:o 8 E E 0 :: 0 .-: tn E W Q. c: tn -g888888:. .
E
(N
11111 Lt 111' ~.11.~.u'ui. fU i..
I g-11111 ~
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
72/81
~-.
. .1~./
.-----.-----
--------
=-==--=
_---
MonLAeFwd
~j .r-..
-II.1.lI"I
ISA-k_~,
~.~.~~
.-~
,~I:Jt2~
L
~.,\i~
\C-r.- t- \-
2
CmmuyD
Po
Peco
CmmuyD
Poma
n
CmmuyD
AoSePeco
-Aa A* BaAa EsgDSmic MTAMloRa -RedlJne -BBu~Line -GreenLine --GodLLnen."..,.".CrengeLine(UndeCan.trccan)
Men oyo
LAe
.AesvbDcwD
ae
om1w
OibD,MTAh
5&
nUP
uCUG
a
M 4
I
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
73/81
C
Inx
.
InxoRnan
EaueSvcePoas
.
In
sBeoh
CmndRusfomTw2SpaeMos
.TatSvceSyMoUeodfyAeo
PenaNd
.Cm
yDHPomnMo-UedoPedc
PomaeoCmmutyDHAtenve
---:___
MonLAeFwd
2
I
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
74/81
EauoRnoCdeRe
C
LPUCINU
EXSNC
TO
ID
FUMETR
TN
C
Ofce
.
Pnmn
FuGro
Tan
Cmy
In
.
Inx
Pc
Svc
DH
Rnn
Cmn
Sy
Dmn
Pc
I
I
Mn
l
l
.
WebPgIn
CcBes
CmmutyDH
Tan
Ays
Pea
In
Rruun
. .
Sue
,LSTO
.C
D
~
.
.
RO.r
EUONA
R
NO
AT
TV 2
I
--------_--
=- MonLAeFwd
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
75/81
EauoR
noC
deRe
RemedialActions
.RnbeoCmmutyDHPea
Inx
.OtherCriticalFactorsEvaluated
.BarrierstoSuccess--NoCriticalFlaws
-FareIntegration
-ServiceDuplicationandOverlap(Lessthan75singleroute
dco
-O
aoFos(egsrenwkunradugad
.ProvisionofOn-GoingOperatingSubsidy
-FmuaF
foRruuedSvc
-ParticipationbyOtherJurisdictionsand/orEntities
==--.--
-.-.---
-------
---.---
-----
_-_---
MonLA
eFwd
3
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
76/81
l~S
r~
~\'~
'V.~
--~-I=i-_-_
3
MonLAeFwd
RePosa
D
Pea
In
Cm
yDHPea
HgCm
yDHBBse+
Tasvcu
s
ae
-Aa A BowAa EsnDSvPoDSvc
MfAMeoR
- -- - ~ Men D
CyoLge
.AesebOccwD
eee
omSsd
O.aLAMfAT
&
uCnAUG
.p 4
o
3
I
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
77/81
CommunityDASHPotential
InxRnn
Cmy
C
Re
DH
Ta
PredictedPI
OWa
P
Dsc
Pea
Sy
ReMeVce
Se
25
VNWhs
12Mum
15
65
4
7
SmSFn
12Mum
15
88
4
111
EeRGaPk
12Mum
14
78
4
89
NhUvyPk
11
Hg
18
46
3
1
SPo1hSe
11
Lw
11
40
2
Aenv2b
.
.
6
SVeCrcao
11Mum
12
72
4
41
HywILFzb
11
Lw
10
17
6
1
WeWasAenv2
10Mum
12
74
4
7
SmAea
10
Hg
13
51
3
9
PodRo
10Mum
11
56
3
Aenv2b
111
EyaVeCePk
10Mum
11
78
4
LnnHgs
==~..
..
....---MnLAeFDwd
aMbmemeseoMsvcaunc
bMcooesnCm
yDsvcernaoepmaec
3
I
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
78/81
~.-~~ca~)((1-c~--ca.-..~(1..oD.:Eenc:c~..-~~EEo(J
UI.. aa10 Ucc .-Q. .ccc;:UI:: aa10 ::
3: ==, cccc -c: ;:o 0a:II'tcc'6eQ.
~ ;;UI -c: Co10 Co.. ;:I- in~' :: ; eEinc:oEc(. uoooino Q.
cc'S&
1i tc: ..;: ..o ,00
('
ioccCD
co"'T'
...2Ji-.aT'
.:L-COc.Q)enenCO
IIc:.8 ('gg Q):: ~en COCO c:S Q5-1: :::Jo:2
--.:L-COc."0c:CO::.2'I-.T'--T'
-.
o('f'oaT'E,~"0Q):2('aT'
-.T'--T'
('
CDT'-.
-.Q)oE,~"0Q):2NaT'
c:o-C).:i:c:
oT'
(' N
Q)aio cof'toCD"'T'
..,2Ji E:J'6Q):2NaT'
Q)L-;:COC/--"0L-CO.Q.Q:JI:i ~'N,~ Q);:Q) ,-u. -COen c:o L-.. 2::
f'
oQ)
coCJo
('T'---.
-.
T'cxCD
o"'T'
..,2Jif'CJo
NQ);::Oc:L-2:: II ~L- .cQ) ~- Nc: Q)Q) ;: :L- COQ) c:c: L-L- Q)CO ::S ccc:oen-eQ).Qo0:--enEroc.T'T'
v
Q)..CD
ioco
E:J'6Q):2CDCJo
('
-.
coCJio
Q)cxoE.~"0Q):2
C"CJo
;:-o.QL-COIioT'
-.
CDC'CD
ior-oE.~"0Q):2
1:Q)Ea.:;CTQ)ic:/J 0Q) :.gg '6
~ -go ooQ) '2.5 ':;-g i:: .."C is .~is ii~ ::ii ~c: 0~ ~:o :::: E.~ .g /J cc~ :. uui .~~ i5 E +:; ~.c i;=- '6cu 0:E :E
NCJo
L-o-CO"SU. :"0ooloI..-eozCD--N ~ e:
II
ui::o'"i
"Cc:cu
MM
11111 1~ 111' ofII . -i
Iiuii: ~I ggiiiii ~
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
79/81
InInCI(.(.::enCI..::o~::enc(c~CIzo..In..CI--....cam
J:C):Jos.J:..oC) ts:nJ-. nJ .. -.en Q) J: en~ .=.~ Q)- -- ~ .-E C'.~ EQ) Q) ~ s:: s. nJ.- t s. ~t ...-s: s: nJ s:nJ nJ~ 0-"' J:.. Q) :J ..en Q)o Q)en .. J: s.Q) en~ 0 ..- 0 ~ E .2:' 0 0 .. ""(1 ..._. w. ..~ CD CI:. ~ nJ ... ..~ e z; ~ .5~~m~sengo en s: nJ - nJ a:U OO~O~,. 00 OnJ ..0'v .. .. 0 ..LL Q) CD ' Q) ~- s. s. CD s..-ca nJ nJ.. nJ enC en en nJ en s:.2 ~ ) ~ ~ ~
.. :J CD :J ~ca OZ;O o~) et (/ E et.g .. .
o..s:.-s:s.:J..=CD
.
--caa:caC)C.-'=CIUJCI..::oa:~Cc:
.-..ca..C)CI
.. C.E 0CI ;:.. caca ..LL UJ.
ens.CD t
.L:I ~s: +:o en- .-.. )(nJ CD..s: 0CD Q) ..E.~ ~CD ~ 0c. CD nJE en 0-tn .-:: .. .5e .s (/ ; CDtno s. c: E .~.2 C CD Ea. s."t 0 .-o 0- s: nJ s:D: Q) nJ C. .e).. CDCI s: ' s. 0.. nJ l- s. ..:: J::E 0 s:o 0 s. 't 0a: Q) 0 C) +:o 't s: nJ~.~~:g~.a ~o~cQ)UJ .- 0C)~.s ~ ~.~C :E.~ :E ~ CD.- en.. .~ -g .~ .~ c:(. :J nJ :J :J l-:: C' E C' C':E.. CD CD CD Q) 't1; et t et et 0~. ...
-
--M
II.... 1t ...1' ofmii~IIII ~iq.-
I g-.111 I ~
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
80/81
Ceds LA
CITYOFLosANGE.LES
D
RMENOFTRNORAON
.WayneK.Tanda,GeneralManager
.JamesOkazaki,AssistantGeneral
Ma
OfceoTapao
DeomeTatSvce
.JimLefton,ChiefofTransitPrograms,
BeoTatSvce
.PAeTatPan
DeomeDvso
DHN
AemeSuPoe
Mangmn
.MichaelF.Davies
.KeyvanShahrouz
. -~===.---
=----\.=
-----~-
MogLAgeFwd
.TransportationManagement
Dgn
.RussChisholm,Principal
In
Cg
.ManuelSoto,DeputyProject
Mang
.MarySueO'Melia,Project
Manager,O'MeliaConsulting
.TrishaMurakawa,Public
OurehCutaC
um
Aoae
.KeithKillough,KLKConsulting
.UCLADepartmentofUrban
Pann
3
-
8/12/2019 LADOT Community DASH Restructuring Study
81/81
~zEEoo