Jeff Dombroski, Lauren Gutlohn, Bernard Marger
Making the task of shopping for clothes online more efficient.
Existing System
Our System
User Study Conditions● Our user study conditions involved our participants
trying out each interface (traditional vs. Shopregate) for a week at a timeo In order to allow for equal, unbiased representation
of each interface and to aid in data collection
● We received 16 participants for our user study
Results and Analysis
From the results of the p-values, we can see a significant difference in the efficiency of the two interfaces and the ease of clothing comparison with each. There was not a significant difference in the ease of use between the two interfaces.
Question Mean and Std. Dev (Traditional)
Mean and Std. Dev (Shopregate)
p-/t-values
Efficiency Mean: 5.94Std. Dev: 2.05
Mean: 7.81Std. Dev: 2.71
p-value: 0.034587t-value: 1.9682
Ease of Use Mean: 7.19Std. Dev: 1.97
Mean: 7.63Std. Dev: 3.46
p-value: 0.33262t-value: 0.4420
Easy to Compare Mean: 5.19Std. Dev: 2.69
Mean: 7.81Std. Dev: 3.02
p-value: 0.010668t-value: 2.5913
ConclusionFrom the results of the study, we can reject the
null hypothesis due to there being a significant difference in efficiency and ease of comparison between Shopregate and the standard interfaces.
Recommend to a friend: 6.5/10Common feedback: There needs to be
more stores and filters.