ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 1
ITEP Meeting on the future of heavy flavour physicsJuly 24-25,2006
Marcello A. GiorgiUniversità di Pisa and INFN Pisa
SuperB Flavor Factory
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 2
Outline
• So far…
• Status of SuperB activity
• Status of Machine Effort
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 3
SuperB International Study Group
THE GROUP IS OPEN TO CONTRIBUTORS AND PARTICIPANTS !!
Goals of SuperB International Study Group :• Study the physics case, machine and detector for a Super Flavor Factory
with a luminosity higher than 1036, to study physics in b, c and sectors.• Prepare by the beginning of 2007 a Report “CDR” to be delivered to the
President of INFN , it will be submitted to an International Review Committee and presented to the International Community.
Events: 3 Workshops: LNF (November 2005 and March 2006), SLAC (June 2006)UK meeting on SuperB in Daresbury 26-26 April Round table in Elba on Future Machines 23 May :• presentation of Suzuki containing SuperKEKB possibilty (4 1035 and 40-50
ab-1 by 2020)• INFN President R.Petronzio presented SuperB as one of priorities of INFN
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 4
On physics case
On the physics case many documents are available they are the result of three years of Physics workshops in Slac ,in KEK and Joint meetings in Hawaii .
Three years of Physics Workshops have produced heavy documents . See for example:
The Discovery Potential of a Super B Factory (Slac-R-709)
Letter of Intent for KEK Super B Factory ( KEK Report 2004-4 )
Physics at Super B Factory ( hep-ex/0406071 )At the URL :www.pi.infn.it/SuperByou can find documents and links to documents
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 5
On physics case
The physics case for a Super Flavour Factory is solid if :See
•The sample of data available in a few years of running would be bigger than 50 ab -1 and approaching 100 ab -1 (10 11 B Bbar, tau and charm pairs) .
•The running period is overlapped to LHC. (Results from Super Flavour Factory and LHC are largely complementary).
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 6
On physics case..
This issue has been widely presented and discussed in Topical Conferences (as DIF06 in Frascati, 28/2/2006-3/3/2006) and in workshops as the CERN series
Flavour Physics in the era of LHC(So far 3 workshops : Nov 2006, Feb 2006 and May 2006)The May workshop included a special session devoted to
High intensity, High luminosity flavour experiments and a round table chaired by I.Bigi to compare expected performance and physics expectation from SuperB, SuperKEKB and LHCb .
.
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 7
On physics case
The physics case is continuing to be refined with the solid contribution of theorists.
An ad-hoc subgroup was set up to study the physics reach on and charm and the possible impact on the machine and detector design of the possibility of one polarized beam and special runs at low cms Energies ( 4.0 and 5.0 GeV) still with a luminosity higher than 10 35cm-2 s -1.
Contiguous to the 4th SuperB workshop to be held Nov 16-18 2006 in Rome, a theory meeting is also planned for an updated physics assessment.
On this subject today I will only show few vignettes
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 8
UNIVERSAL UT fit with 50 ab-1
Universal fit makes only use of quantities independent of NP contributions within MFV
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 9
bsl+l- precision measurements
New Physics – K(*) l+l-, sl+l- e+e- Precision
Measurement Goal 3/ab 10/ab 50/ab 100/ab
(BK/(BKe+e-) SM: 1 ~8% ~4% ~2% ~1.5%
ACP(BK* l+l-) (all) (high mass)
SM: < 0.05%
~6%
~12%
~3%
~6%
~1.5%
~3%
~1.1%
~2%
AFB(BK*l+l-) : ŝ0SM: ±5% ~20% ~9% 9%
AFB(Bsl+l-) : ŝ0 27% 15% 6.7% 5.0%
AFB (Bsl+l-) : C9 , C10 36-55% 20-30% 9-13% 7-10%
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 10
Extrapolation at high Lumi
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 11
Rare Decays
MEASUREMENT Goal 3/ab 10/ab 50/ab 100/ab
BD*) SM: : 8x10-3 10.2% 5.6% 2.5%
Bs)K,K* SM:Theory ~5%1 excl: 4x10-6
~1 >3 >4 >5
Binvisible) <2x10-6 <1x10-6 <4x10-7 <2.5x10-7
Bd ) ~8x10-11 <3x10-8 <1.6x10-8 <7x10-9 <5x10-9
Bd ) ~1x10-8 <1x10-3 O(10-4) ? ?
) now< 6.8 10-8 <3.410-9
Ks) now < 5.10-8 <1.2510-10
Ldt1
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 12
Report on SuperB Accelerator Effort
SuperB Contributors (Accelerator):BINP: Koop, Levichev, ShatilovKEKB: OhmiLNF: Biagini, Raimondi, ZobovPisa: M.G., PaoloniSLAC: Novokhatski, Seeman, Seryi, Sullivan, Wienands
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 13
A Comment!
SuperB is commonly named “Linearly colliding Super B Factory”
to avoid confusion and misinterpretation:SuperB is not a linear collider. It is instead a machine that is based on several
concepts of linear collider as:Damping rings to get very low emittance, the final
focus as in linear collider and in general the characteristics of very small size of the bunches for the high luminosity.
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 14
SuperB effort
• Strong interest of SLAC PEP-II staff to collaborate and possibly contribute with hardware (PEP-II magnets, vacuum pumps, power supplies, RF)
• Interest from other major Laboratories (SLAC, KEK, BINP) to collaborate on proof-of-principle simulations
• Before the IV SuperB Workshop in Rome (16-18 November 2006) there will be at the end of september 2006 an “Accelerator only” retreat week .
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 15
Summary from Oide’s talk at 2005 2nd Hawaii SuperBF Workshop
• Present design of SuperKEKB hits fundamental limits in the beam-beam effect and the bunch length (HOM & CSR)
• Higher current is the only way to increase the luminosity
• Many technical and cost issues are expected with a new RF system
• We need a completely different collider scheme.....
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 16
Issues
• HIGH CURRENT and HIGH BACKGROUND IS AN ISSUE FOR :
• DETECTOR DESIGN
• WALL POWER NEEDED
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 17
ILC rings & ILC FF
Simplified SuperB layout
Crossing angle = 2*25 mrad
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 18
Present parameter set based on ILCDR-like parameters:
• Same DR emittances
• Same DR bunch length
• 1.5 times DR bunch charges
• PEP-KEK DR damping time
• Same ILC-IP betas
• Crossing angle and “crab waist” to minimize bb blowup
Machine parameters
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 19
High luminosity requires:
- short bunches
- small vertical emittance
- large horizontal size and emittance to mimimize beam-beam
For a ring:- easy to achieve small horizontal emittance and horizontal size
- Hard to make short bunches
Crossing angle swaps X with Z, so the high luminosity requirements are naturally met: Luminosity goes with 1/x and is weakly dependent by z
REQUIREMENTS
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 20
Crossing angle concepts
With large crossing angle X and Z
quantities are swapped: Very important!!!
Both cases have the same luminosity,but (2) has longer bunch and smaller x
1) Standardshort bunches
2) Crossing angle
z
x
Overlapping region
x
z
Overlapping region
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 21
Vertical waist has to be a function of x:
Z=0 for particles at –x (- x/2 at low current)
Z= x/ for particles at +x (x/2 at low current) Crabbed waist realized with a sextupole in phase with the IP in X and
at /2 in Y
“Crab waist” removes beam-beam betratron couplingIntroduced by the crossing angle
“Crab waist” (P. Raimondi)
2z
x
2x
2x/
2z*
Y
z
e-e+
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 22
Crab waist properties
• Large Piwinski's (not only crossing) angle: P=*z/x • Low y comparable with the 'overlap area' • Low x and long bunch length • Crab focus eliminates the betatron resonances introduced by the
Piwinski's angle• Synchrotron resonances are not suppressed but damped horizontally • Partial compensation of the hourglass effect due to the y shift along
the 'overlap' area. y is shifted not only with x, but also along the longitudinal axis
For a fixed longitudinal position, y does not depend on the horizontal motion anymore !
No vertical modulation due to the horizontal oscillations !
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 23
Crab-waist simulations
• The new idea is being checked by several beam-beam codes:– Guinea-Pig: strong-strong , ILC centered– BBC (Hirata): weak-strong – Lifetrack (Shatilov): weak-strong with tails
growths calculation– Ohmi: weak-strong (strong-strong to be modified
for long bunches and large angles)
Storage
rings
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 24
Collisions with uncompressed beamsCrossing angle = 2*25 mrad
Relative Emittance growth per collision: yout/yin=1. 5x10-3
Horizontal Plane Vertical Plane
BB simulations with ILC code
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 25
Ohmi’s weak-strong code
K2 is the strength of the sextupolar nonlinearity introduced to have crab waist
Luminosity Vertical blow-up
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 26
Conclusions on bb simulations
• The “crossing angle with crab waist” scheme has shown big potentiality and exciting results LNF, Pisa, BINP and KEKB physicists are working on bb simulations with different codes to find the best set of parameters
• This scheme is promising also for increasing luminosity at existing factories, as DANE, KEKB and possibly PEP-II
• Crab waist scheme is planned to be tested in 2007 in DANE
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 27
SuperB ILC-like rings
• ILC OCS (Baseline) lattice used• Scaled to 4 and 7 GeV• 3.0 Km long rings studied• Lattice symmetry respected• Fewer and lower field wigglers used (pm )• Preliminary Final Focus (ILC-like) included• Design based on recycling all PEP hardware,
Bends, Quads and Sexts, and RF system• Maximize Luminosity keeping low DE and
wall power.
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 28
O 1.0Km O 0.7Km
Possible site: Tor Vergata campusRing circumference: 3. to 2.2 Km
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 29
Ring Parameters
Energy (GeV) 4 7
C (m) 2985 2985
Bw (T) 1.4 1.
Lbend(m) 2.1 11.2
N. bends 96 96
Bbend (T) 0.439 0.144
Uo (MeV/turn) 2.3 4.1
N. wigg. cells 4 4
x (ms) 34 34.
s (ms) 17 17
x (nm) 0.70 0.73
E 1.0x10-3 1.1x10-3
Ibeam (A) 3.0 1.73
Pbeam(MW) 6.9 7.1
Pwall (MW) (50% eff) x2 rings 28.0
Sigx* m 2.67Sigy nm 16.1Betx mm 9.0Bety mm 0.130Sigz mm 6.0Sige_Lum MeV 8.3Emix nm 0.8Emiy nm 0.002Emiz m 13.2Cross_angle mrad 2*15Sigz_DR mm 6.0Sige_DR 1.1e-3Np 10e10 3.0Nbunches 4741DR_length km 3.0s msec 17Collision freq MHz 476Lgeometric 1e36 1.2Lmultiturn 1e36 1.0
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 30
0
5 1036
1 1037
1,5 1037
2 1037
2,5 1037
0 2,5 1010 5 1010 7,5 1010 1 1011 1,25 1011 1,5 1011
Luminosity [cm-2 s-1]
N
M. Zobov, D. Shatilov
1036
Upgradeable
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 31
EXERCISE 1 :4x7 GeV rings with PEP-II dipoles & quadrupoles in a 3.0Km ring
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 32
SuperB-ILC synergy
• Potential size and cost reduction of the ILC complex
• Potential decrease of the ILC commissioning time
• Potential increase of the ILC performances
• Could the ILC community benefit by having an operating
positron DR just 3 Km long delivering 4741 bunches with
3x1010 particles/bunch?
• Could the ILC community benefit by having an operating
Beam Delivery System with ILC-IP beams sizes and
betas?
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 33
Conclusions on machine
• Solution with ILC DR + ILC FF seems extremely promising
• Uses all the work done for ILC (DR and FF) 100% synergy with ILC
• Beam Currents around 3.0/1.7 A, and backgrounds should be better than PEP and KEKB
• Possibly to operate at the energy with L=1035
• Needs the standard injector system, probably a C-band 7GeV linac like in KEKB upgrade
• Possibility to simultaneously boost the performances of the existing machines and do SuperB R&D.
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 34
Beam Pipe Radius and Detector Issues
• Small beam pipe radius possible because of small beam size– Studied impact of boost on vertex separation (B)– Rest of tracking is Babar– Beam pipe needs to be cooled.Study is in progress to
keep total thickness low in the order of % of rad
Separationsignificance Proper time
differenceresolution
7+4GeV
Boost =.28
Instead of 0.56
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 35
Pipe Inner Radius 1 cm“Uniform” water gap(8 flat channels)
Single channel area = 2.35 mm2
Channel width = 300 m
Flow: 4.2 m/s (OK)
To dissipate 1KW with waterspecific heat and thermal conductivity
Requires channel 1-side coating to prevent erosion
(7m Ni or BerylcoatD)
Possibly a Peek (plastic) jacket
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 36
Detector comments
Background should be lower than in Babar. Occupancy would be OK in Vertex Detector even with a smaller radius beam pipe. (from 3cm of Babar down to 1.cm). Simulations are currently run for interaction region and Bgkd.
Apparatus would be more hermetic than Babar and Belle (7+4 GeV).Detectors don’t require a major R&DPID would be needed also in forward/backward direction.By reducing Lorentz boost higher resolution vertex is needed (MAPS?)
R&D on EMC (Babar Caltech..)R&D on PID (Babar: Slac) (Belle :KeK ,Lubijana
x5 scale with 10mm radius BP, 6mm pixel chip
R&D on Maps within Belle (Hawaii group)and Babar (Pisa+Slac)Two monolithic active pixel layers glued on beam pipe
Since active region is only ~10m, silicon can be thinned down to ~50m.Good resolution O(5m).Improves pattern recognition robustness and safety against background
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 37
MAPS R&D
• SLIM chip (Babar collabor.)
PRE SHAPER DISC LATCH
=105 mV =12 mV
Landau peak 80 mV saturation
due to low energy particle.
1250
2200 3000 (e-)
1640
threshold
threshold
90Sr electrons
Noise only (no source)
55Fe X-rays
Charge sharing
ST 0.13um triple well technologySingle pixels tested with sourceFull signal processing chain
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 38
FINAL Conclusion
Either BaBar or Belle can be reused in SuperB with a moderate upgrade. Trigger and DAQ must be updated.
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 39
• BACKUP
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 40
SuperB-Factories Parameters before SuperB activity (may05)
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi
SuperKEKB (K. Ohmi)SuperKE
KBCrab waist
x 9.x10-9 6. x10-9 6. x10-9 6. x10-9 6. x10-9
y 4.5x10-11 6. x10-11 6. x10-11 6. x10-11 6. x10-11
x (mm) 200 100 50 100 50
y (mm) 3 1 0.5 1 0.5
z (mm) 3 6 6 4 4
s 0.025 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Ne 5.5x1010 5.5x1010 5.5x1010 3.5 x1010 3.5 x1010
Np 1.26x1011 1.27x1011
1.27x101
1 8. x1010 8. x1010
/2 (mrad)
0 15 15 15 15
x 0.397 0.0418 0.022 0.0547 0.0298
y 0.794-
>0.240.1985 0.179 0.178 0.154
Lum (W.S.)
8.x1035 6.7x1035 1. x1036 3.95 x1035 4.8 x1035
Lum (S.S.)
8.25x1035 4.77x103
5 9x1035 3.94x1035 4.27x1035
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 42
Flange detail
O-ring insertion
F.Raffaelli
+
=
Be wall
Outer peek wall
Hybrid Cooling Chamber
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 43
Gold foil 4 um 0.121 % X0 Berillium 300 um 0.142 % X0Peek layer 500 um 0.330 % X0Water 300 um 0.083 % X0Ni coating 7 um 0.050 % X0
Total 0.726 % X0
Power dissipation 1 KWT Inlet 8 CT MAX raise 3 CWater speed < 5m/sNegative pressure
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 44
EXERCISE 2 : 7 GeV ring, 2.2 Km as PEPII
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 45
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
0 3 1010 6 1010 9 1010 1,2 1011 1,5 1011
N
Vertical Emittance Blow Up
Gaussian Fit
rms
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 46
0,95
1
1,05
1,1
1,15
0 3 1010 6 1010 9 1010 1,2 1011 1,5 1011
N
Horizontal Emiittance Blow Up
Gaussian Fitrms
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 47
0,96
0,98
1
1,02
1,04
1,06
0 3 1010 6 1010 9 1010 1,2 1011 1,5 1011
N
Longitudinal Emittance Blow Up
Gaussian Fit
rms
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 48
Nominal damping2.5 times longer
5 times longer
N = 2.5 x 1010
Ax x Ay = 15 x x 20 y
N = 5.0 x 1010
Ax x Ay = 25 x x 80 y
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 49
SuperSuperB with ILC Damping Ring Parameters
Working Point (0.53,0.57); Nb = 7.5 x1010; 6000 Bunches
D.N.Shatilov, M.ZobovL = 1.22 x 1037 cm-2 s-1
0.6/ 0.8/ 1.0/
ITEP Meeting07.25,2006 Moscow
Marcello A Giorgi 50
Detector Issues
As the present parameters for 1036 machine show a running condition not substantially different from the present PEPII/BaBar. One of the present detectors running at BFactories (BaBar or Belle) could be used as is without major modifications (Trigger,DaQ…).
However, mainly due to the reduced asymmetry (7x4 GeV) in the present parameter choice of SuperB a new beam pipe with a small radius and an improved SVT are needed.
An improvement in Detector acceptance and in PID performance are welcome .Detector Effort under coordination of F.Forti and A. Roodman, is currently
carried mainly from Caltech,Pisa and Slac.