Introduction to Title I Fiscal Requirements
Presented by Kristen Tosh Cowan, Esq.
Brustein & Manasevit, [email protected]
Spring Forum 2011
Overview
1) LEA-to-School allocations2) Set asides3) Equitable Services allocation 4) Carryover 5) Comparability6) Reauthorization Predictions
2
Resources -- Allocations
Statute Section 1113
Regulations 34 CFR §200.77-78
Non-regulatory Guidance August 2003
3
Resources – Cross-cutting
“Title I Fiscal Issues” Feb 2008www.ed.gov/programs/titleiparta/ fiscalguid.doc
Consolidating funds in schoolwide
programs, MOE, SNS, Comparability, Grantbacks, Carryover
4
LEA-to-School Allocations
“Ranking and Serving” Rules 1) Identify Eligible Schools 2) Rank Schools in Order of
Poverty 3) Serve Schools Strictly in
Accordance with Rank
5
STEP 1: IDENTIFY ELIGIBLE SCHOOLS
6
Eligible School Attendance Areas
Percentage of children from low-income families who reside in area . . . .
AT LEAST AS HIGH AS . . . .
percentage of children from low-income families in LEA
7
LEA Discretion: Eligibility
“35 Percent Rule” May designate as eligible Must still serve in order
8
LEA Discretion: Eligibility
“Grandfathering” option Continue if served last year But, only continue for one year
9
5 Poverty Measures:
1. Census data2. Free and reduced lunch3. TANF4. Medicaid eligibility5. Composite of above
10
STEP 2: RANK ELIGIBLE SCHOOLS IN ORDER OF POVERTY
11
Ranking and Serving Exceeding 75% poverty
Strictly by poverty Without regard to gradespan
At or below 75% poverty May rank by gradespan
12
Exception: NO Rank & Serve if
Small LEA exclusion If <1000 students
One school at each gradespan
13
STEP 3: SERVE SCHOOLS STRICTLY IN ORDER OF RANK
14
Allocation to Schools BUT first, calculate set-asides Allocate to schools based on total
# of students from low income families residing in area (including nonpublic)
Discretion on amount of PPA Higher PPAs must be in higher schools
on ranked list
15
Allocations given without regard to schoolwide or
targeted assistance model
Title I funding . . . . . . To school based on poverty
. . . To student based on academics
“125 Percent” Rule
If serve any school <35% Then PPAs for all schools must be
at least 125% of LEA’s PPA under Title I allocation Entire LEA Title I-A Grant # of low income on census
17
EXAMPLE:
$1,000,000 total Title I grant 2,000 poverty students
= $500/ student PPA
If serve school <35% poverty, $500 x 1.25 = $625 PPA
18
Exception: Rank & Serve “Skip” school, if:
1. Comparability met2. Receiving supplemental state/local
funds used in Title I-like program3. Supp. State/local funds meet or exceed
amount would be received under Title I
Still count and serve nonpublic in area
19
Title I Set-Asides
LEA MUST reserve specific percentage:
20% choice transportation and SES 1% parental involvement 10% professional dev (if LEA ID)
21
LEA MUST reserve but not specific percentage: Administration (public and private) Homeless Neglected & delinquent
22
LEA MAY reserve:
Incentives to teachers in ID schools (<5%)
Professional development “other authorized activities”
Summer school Preschool Districtwide program
23
CAUTION:
DON’T CIRCUMVENT “RANKING AND
SERVING” RULES!
Calculating % set asides
Take off entire LEA grant Transferability:
Includes transferred amounts Carryover:
Does not include carry over (apply % only in first year available)
25
Example
Title I, Part A = $500,000 Transferred $30,000 from Title II Carried over $50,000 from prior
year
Each % set aside applies to $530,000
26
Funds for Supp Ed Services and Choice Transportation
Amount equal to 20% of LEA allocation
(unless lesser amount needed) To pay transportation for choice To satisfy all requests for SES
services Both
27
If no SES, then 20% on choice
If no choice, then 20% on SES
If both, then minimum of 5% for choice, 5% for supp services, and 10% for either
28
Credit for “Parent Outreach”
Allow limited amount of funds for “parent outreach” to count toward 20%
Capped at 0.2% of LEA Part A grant May spend more for outreach, but only
0.2% counts toward 20% EX - $1 million LEA grant;
20% = $200,000 0.2% = $2,000 can count toward $200,000
29
What costs count as “parent outreach”?
Parent notices, communication through the media, internet, and community, displaying information on LEA’s website, and parent fairs
Allowance, not a requirement
30
“Amount equal to 20%” May use Title I, Part A; school
improvement (sect. 1003); ARRA transferability
State, local, or private funds
31
If use Title I Funds, from where?
Off the top of LEA allocation OR from individual school allocations? Both permitted If school in corrective action or
restruct, <15%
32
Use 20% “unless a lesser amount is needed”
How do you know if less is needed?
33
To spend less than 20%, LEA must: 200.48(d)(2)(i)
1. Partner, to extent practicable, with outside groups (CBO, FBO, etc.)
2. Send timely, accurate notice to parents
3. Ensure SES sign-up forms given directly to all eligible students/ parents
4. Ensure SES sign-up forms made widely available through broad dissemination (Internet, other media, public agencies)
34
5. Provide (at a minimum) two enrollment windows at separate points in school year of sufficient length
6. Ensure SES providers are given access to school facilities, using a fair, open and objective process, on same basis as others
35
Does LEA need SEA’s permission before reallocating the 20%?
NO!
36
LEA must document and notify SEA!
Before reallocating remainder of 20%, LEA must:
Maintain records demonstrating it has met criteria
Notify the SEA that it met criteria Notify SEA of amount of remainder
it intends to spend on other allowable activities
37
SEA monitors 20% compliance through: (200.48(d)(3))
Regular monitoring (on multi-year cycles) Ensure 6 criteria are met
More frequent monitoring For LEAs that have spent “significant portion” of
20% on other activities AND subject of “multiple complaints, supported by credible evidence,” regarding implementation of choice or SES
SEA must complete its review by the beginning of the next school year
38
Consequences for non-compliance200.48(d)(4)
If SEA finds LEA did not meet all 6 criteria, then LEA must in the subsequent year: Spend amount equal to the remainder
of 20% in the subsequent year on choice/ SES, in addition to new 20%, OR
Meet all 6 criteria and obtain permission from the SEA before spending less than full 20% in subsequent year.
39
How to reallocate?
If took school allocations, then reallocated to those schools
Subject to equitable participation of private school students
40
Set Aside for Parent Involvement
For LEAs with Part A allocations >$500,000
1% minimum reserved Proportional amount to private
students 95% of remainder to schools 5% of remainder kept at LEA
41
Equitable Services for Private School Students
43
Equitable Services:Deriving Allocation
General Formula: Based on number of:
1. Private school students 2. From low-income families3. Who reside in Title I-participating
public school attendance areas
44
Calculate Allocation for Instruction:
1. Identify eligible school attendance areas2. Rank in order of poverty3. Strictly serve in rank order (i.e., ID who is
“Participating Public School”)4. Calculate PPA for each area5. Derive allocation amount for each area
must include nonpublic low-income #
6. Reserve nonpublic amount PPA x # of nonpublic low-income students who
reside in participating public sch area
45
Reservation for districtwide instruction
If LEA reserves for “districtwide instructional programs for public elementary and secondary”
Then proportional amount goes to nonpublic
34 CFR sect 200.64(a)(2)(i)(A)
46
Example
LEA reserves $500,000 for districtwide reading initiative
Of all low-income in LEA residing in participating attend areas, 5% are private
5% of $500,000 to private allocation
47
Applies to: Summer school After school programs Reading coaches
DOES NOT APPLY TO: SES/ Choice (20%) Preschool
48
Reservation for teachers and families
If LEA reserves funds for parental involvement or professional development
Then proportional amount to nonpublic
34 CFR sect 200.65(a)
49
Example LEA reserves 1% of $500,000
allocation for parental involvement, or $5,000.
Of all low-income families residing in participating attend area, 6% are private. Then 6% of $5,000 used for families of participating private school students.
Carryover
General Rule: May carryover up to 15% of Title I, Part A
Reallocated by state if exceeds
Waiver
50
Use of Carryover Funds
Flexible 3 Options:
1. Put back in LEA formula & redistribute2. Designate for particular LEA activities3. (Allow school to retain)
Cannot use in ineligible school
51
3 Pillars of Fiscal Accountability
1. Maintenance of Effort2. Supplement not
Supplant3. Comparability
Heightened Federal Scrutiny on Comparability!!
Common finding of USDE Program Reviewers
Many serious findings in OIG Audits Focus of “equity” initiatives
53
General Rule - §1120A(c) An LEA may receive Title I, Part A
funds only if it uses state and local funds to provide services in Title I schools that, taken as a whole, are at least comparable to the services provided in non-Title I schools.
Reasonable variance is ok (10%)
54
If all are Title I schools, all must be “substantially comparable.”
Reasonable variance ok (>10%)
55
Timing
Common Finding!
Guidance: Must be annual determination
Review for current year and make adjustments for current year
56
Written Assurances
LEA must file with SEA written assurances of policies for equivalence: LEA-wide salary schedule Teachers, administrators, and other staff Curriculum materials and instructional
supplies Must keep records to document
implemented and “equivalence achieved”
57
Demonstrate “equivalence achieved” through:
Student/instructional staff ratios; Student/instructional staff salary ratios; Expenditures per pupil; or A resource allocation plan based on
student characteristics such as poverty, LEP, disability, etc. (i.e., by formula)
Need only meet under 1 approach
58
How to measure??
Compare: Average of all non-Title I schoolsto Each Title I school
59
For example: Using student/ instructional staff ratios Average of all
non-Title I schools = 10:1
Title I schools: Lincoln: 10:1 Washington: 9:1 Madison: 11:1 Jefferson: 12:1
60
Basis for evaluation: Compare: Grade-spans Large schools Small schools
61
Does not apply if LEA has:
Only 1 school Only 1 school at each gradespan
62
Exclusions:
Federal Funds Private Funds
63
Exclusions:
Need not include unpredictable changes in students enrollment or personnel assignments that occur after the start of a school year
64
Exclusions: LEA may exclude state/ local funds expended for:
Language instruction for LEP students
Excess costs of providing services to students with disabilities
Supplemental programs that meet the intent and purposes of Title I
Staff salary differentials for years of employment
65
Who is “instructional staff”? Consistent between Title I and
non-Title I
Teachers (art, music, phys ed), guidance counselors, speech therapists, librarians, social workers, psychologists
Paraprofessionals – ED: up to SEA/ LEA
66
How to calculate in a SWP?
Problem (theoretically): Cannot exclude state and local funds Cannot identify teachers paid with
state and local funds Use (non-federal) expenditures per
student
67
How to calculate with charter schools?
Charters must be included (if not independent LEAs)
Problem: No LEA control over staffing
Use (non-federal) expenditures per student
68
How will Reauthorization impact Title I Fiscal Requirements?
Reauthorization Predictions
Comparability Close loophole of excluding salary
differential to reflect seniority Move to measuring non-federal
expenditures/ student Supplement not Supplant
Change to reviewing total amount of funding, not individual expenditure?
70
Reauthorization Predictions
Choice/ SES – Unlikely 20% minimum mandate One option of many Target to underperforming subgroup
Financial incentives for teachers and students
71
Reauthorization Predictions
No significant changes to: Ranking & serving rules Equitable services Consolidating funds in schoolwides Time & effort
72
This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice or a legal service. This presentation does not create a client-lawyer relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC and, therefore, carries none of the protections under the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct. Attendance at this presentation, a later review of any printed or electronic materials, or any follow-up questions or communications arising out of this presentation with any attorney at Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC. You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances.
73