Download - Introduction to the Niobrara
![Page 1: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Niobrara Chalk Beds, South Dakota, Yankton CountyPhoto Credit: Samuel Calvin, 1873-1911 uiowa.edu
Introduction to the Niobrara
Brief Geologic Overview and Impact on
Completion Strategy
![Page 2: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• Development History• Geology• Variety of Current Completion Strategies• Completion Challenges We Must Address
Outline
![Page 3: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• History & variety of fields associated with the Niobrara– 1876: Florence Field near Canyon City CO (associated Pierre Shale)– Boulder Field. McKenzie #1-21 produced from 1902 to ~2005 (Pierre)– Salt Creek– Tow Creek– Teapot Dome– Twin Buttes & Shell Creek (13,000 to 15,000 ft gas)– Shallow biogenic gas - W KS, W NE, and E CO >3,000 wells– DJ Basin (comingle Niobrara, J Sand and Codell) >20,000 active wells– 2009: EOG’s Jake horizontal well, 1750 bopd; 680 bopd month 2
• 20 to >2000 ft thick. Found at surface to 24,000 ft deep• Thermal maturity varies
– Oil, thermogenic gas, condensate, or biogenic gas• We need to be specific when talking about “the Niobrara”
Niobrara Background
![Page 4: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Late Cretaceous, 90 Ma
Ron Blakely, Northern Arizona University http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~rcb7/90moll.jpg
![Page 5: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Late Cretaceous, 100 Ma
Ron Blakely, Northern Arizona University http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~rcb7/90moll.jpg
Finn, USGS, DDS-69-D
Oscillating sea levelsCritical to understanding
Niobrara deposition
![Page 6: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Sample Strat Column
Showing Benches
DJ: Wattenberg Field
200 ft thick at 7,000 ft depth
Sonnenberg 2002, CSM
Western Colorado
>2000 ft thick at 11,000 ft depth
![Page 7: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Relative extent and locationplus some recent Niobrara activity
Base Map:ArcGIS
Bakken
Niobrara
Fluid Types & Depth RangeOil, gas/condensate, biogenic gas
Surface (outcrop) to 24,000 ft
Whiting (Cody Shale)
True Oil, Barrett
Samson, Termo, Cypress, Quicksilver
Delta, Laramie, Antero, EnCana
EOG, Chesapeake, Baytex, Helis, Resolute
DJ Basin:EnCana, EOG, Noble, Slawson,
Chesapeake, SM, Anadarko, Pine Ridge, Lario, Carrizo, PDC, Marathon, Voyager,
Rubicon, Whiting, Cirque
El Paso
Pioneer, El Paso, Manzano
St Mary, RKI, QEP , Noble, MDU, Rexx, East(Shell), TARC,CHK,MBI(Anadarko)
Laramie, EOG, Bonanza Creek, Wellstar
At least 60 different operators in Niobrara
play
Age equivalent to Austin Chalk
UnderlyingSecond White Specks ~
Favel ~ Greenhorn
Medicine Hat, First White Specks
Age equivalent to Mancos Shale
![Page 8: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Examine Outcrops!
Watney, Kansas Geological Survey
Next image near Lyons
![Page 9: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Examine Outcrops!
From PTTC/RMAG field trip flyer, Gustason, Deacon
Photo from the Portland Cement Quarry near Lyons, CO
![Page 10: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Outcrop of “A” bench. • Typically considered a brittle
formation, sandwiched between ductile shales
• Even minor structure can lead to natural fracturing
AAPG Explorer, Nov 2010, Durham
• Outcrop of “C” bench between Boulder and Lyons.
![Page 11: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Noble Analyst Day June 3 2010
![Page 12: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Variation of Reservoir Conditions
Watney, Kansas Geological Survey and Pollastro
• Kansas– 40-50% porosity– 0.2 to 3 mD. >0.5 mD at shallow depths– Biogenic gas from thermally immature chalk
• Wattenberg– Four 20-30 ft thick chalk benches– <10% porosity in some areas – Fractures mineralized with calcite, quartz, or gypsum– <<0.1 mD at 3000 – 8000 ft depth– Thermogenic gas and condensate
• Silo– Five chalk benches; develop the “B”, 25-35 ft thick– <6-8% porosity but open vertical natural fissures– <0.01 mD matrix perm at 7800 ft depth– Oil, 35-38 API, 500-1000 scf/bbl GOR
![Page 13: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Why are refracs necessary in vertical DJ wells?
Pagano, 2006. See also 134330 for discussion of refrac mechanisms
– Gas Condensate wells in DJ Basin – up to 5 restimulations– Initial fracs used low concentrations of sand
![Page 14: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Increase in Horizontal Drilling
Tom Bratton, SLB
![Page 15: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Challenge:Limited Intersection between Wellbore and Fracture
Horizontal Well with Transversely Intersecting Frac: Enormous fluid velocity and near-wellbore connection is key!
![Page 16: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Woodford Shale Outcrop
Some reservoirs pose challenges to effectively breach and prop through
all laminations
Our understanding of frac barriers and kv should
influence everything from lateral depth to frac fluid type, to implementation
Narrower aperture plus significantly higher stress in
horizontal steps?
Failure to breach all lamina?
Will I lose this connection due to
crushing or embedment of proppant?
Challenge: Effective Frac Design
![Page 17: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
• Design issues– Role of bentonite layers– Degree of proppant embedment– Fluid sensitivity
• Development near urban and residential areas– Increased scrutiny regarding completions and wellsite stewardship
• Water availability– In SE Wyoming, may govern development pace
Some Additional Challenges
![Page 18: Introduction to the Niobrara](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022102710/54705d0fb4af9fa90a8b4718/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
• Extensive play, long history– Many different challenges across play
• Historic Completion Strategies– Notorious “low cost” development with minimal data gathering– More than 5000 refracs have been necessary in the DJ– Horizontal well completion strategy/optimization is equally poor
• Opportunities– Transverse fractures require different optimization approaches
• Must accommodate flow convergence near wellbore• Horizontal wells depend on durable vertical fracs to drain laminated reservoirs
– Reduce or eliminate need for frequent restimulation– Enormous opportunities for improvement
Niobrara Summary