Innovation Portfolio Management
Philip RussellWeyerhaeuser Company
Alan FusfeldThe Fusfeld Group
May 21, 2009www.iriinc.org
Innovation Portfolio ManagementROR 07-2
Phil Russell – WeyerhaeuserRob Williams – BoeingAlan Fusfeld – Fusfeld Group
May 21, 2009
IRI Annual MeetingBoston, MA 2May 21, 2009 2
AgendaBackground & Problem StatementGeneral Structure of “Portfolio of Portfolios”Project Focus and Data GatheringEarly Findings
Previous Work and Existing Software ToolsMajor Findings
Summary of September RoundtableHypotheses (“Rules and Tools”)
ReviewConclusions
IRI Annual MeetingBoston, MA 3May 21, 2009
Background & Problem StatementHistory of project:
2007 RoR: Challenges in R&D Portfolio ManagementMindmap: Tools, Metrics, External Resources, & Allocations Among Multiple PortfoliosDiscussion & Iteration with RoR Chairs – narrow the focus
Problem statement: Portfolio of Portfolios practices less well developed than for a single portfolio
Focus: Determine best practices in Portfolio of Portfolios
General Structure of “Portfolio of Portfolios”
… One or more semi-independent portfolios funded with some degree of shared resources
IRI Annual MeetingBoston, MA 5May 21, 2009 5
Structure of a “Portfolio of Portfolios”
Corporation
Business Unit 1 Business Unit 2 Business Unit 3
Central R&D orNew Product Dvmt
BU1 Portfolio• Project 1-1• Project 1-2• Project 1-3
BU2 Portfolio• Project 2-1• Project 2-2• Project 2-3
BU3 Portfolio• Project 3-1• Project 3-2• Project 3-3
Corp Portfolio• Project Corp 1• Project Corp 2• Project Corp 3
NPD Portfolio• Project NPD 1• Project NPD 2• Project NPD 3
IRI Annual MeetingBoston, MAMay 21, 2009
Portfolio of PortfoliosThe Management Challenge:
Multiple portfolios have different:ObjectivesTime horizonsStakeholders
Typical of large corporations with several autonomous business units Applicable to short vs. long term portfolios!
6
Project Focus and Data Gathering
IRI Annual MeetingBoston, MA 8May 21, 2009 8
Project Focus and Data Gathering
Collection of examples of Multiple Portfolios Literature SearchReview of Software ToolsManagement Framework for Portfolio of Portfolios (PoP)
Governance of portfolio of portfolios Practitioners Roundtable in St. Louis on 9/18/08
Early Findings
Early Findings
Literature SoftwareR&D Portfolio Management (PM) borrows from financial PM conceptsLarge existing literature on Portfolio Management. Lots of theory. Divided into two classes of portfolios
R&D and product line portfolios – purpose is investment allocationProject portfolios – IT project bias; purpose is resource balancing
Less journal literature on:Experience using portfolios in R&D companiesManaging multiple portfolios and layers of portfolios within the firm
Sources: IRI online bibliography is extensive, but dated
IRI Annual MeetingBoston, MA 10May 21, 2009
http://www.iriinc.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Knowledge_Center/ResearchTechnology_Management/RTM_Bibliography/Project_Portfolio_Management.htm
Best book: Portfolio Management For New Products: 2nd ed., by Robert G. Cooper, Scott J. Edgett, Elko J. Kleinschmidt
Focus on R&D with surveys of company usage in mid-90sSurveys and vignettes from IRI ROR studiesMost findings first published in IRI RTM articles
Working group originally had interest in Portfolio Management software tools
Sought to catalog, describe and categorize all tools, and possibly make the catalog accessible and interactive on the IRI web siteConsidered an IRI online tool allowing practioners to begin with a “problem” or “challenge” and navigate to a recommended tool list However, considering IRI practitioners’ problems and challenges, the working group did not find enough established and validated tools
Working group attention shifted to actual experiences, practices and utility of companies using portfolio management for R&DAn online catalog of portfolio management problems and navigation to recommended solutions (including tools) remains a good idea
Possible future ROR working group topic
Major Findings- Conceptual Framework- Summary of Roundtable
IRI Annual MeetingBoston, MA 12May 21, 2009
PoP Conceptual FrameworkMaturity Model is the “Z” Dimension (Immature, Intermediate, Mature)
Governance
Attributes
Autonomous(Governance
Model 1)
Hybrid(Governance
Model 2)
Centralized(Governance
Model 3)
Strategic Purpose & Alignment of PoP
Financial Valuation of PoP
Transparency (Leverage & Duplication Avoidance)
Line Organization Appreciation / Ownership
IRI Annual MeetingBoston, MA 13May 21, 2009 13
ROR Roundtable Outline – Sept., 2008Each participant provides an overview of their company’s approach to R&D portfolio of portfolios management. Each company should use the following outline to degree possible
1. Define the Set of R&D Portfolios That Are Relevant - What Are The Characteristics of Each
2. Share the Goals for the Portfolio of Portfolios and Individual Portfolios
3. Define the Rules for Making Portfolio Resource and Selection Choices, i.e. What is to be Achieved and with what constraints and trade-offs - and what variation over time?
4. Define the Annual Process of Funding, Associated Schedules and Frequency of Reviews
5. Define the Key Roles of Managers and Executives (individually orin groups), Metrics and Purpose/Frequency of Involvement
.
IRI Annual MeetingBoston, MA 14May 21, 2009 14
ROR Roundtable Agenda – Sept. 18 2008Overview of Project-Statement of Problem, Intent of Roundtable and Introductions (30 min)Individual Presentations (30 min each)
1. Unilever Mehmood Khan2. IBM Mercy Bodarky3. Boeing Pam SanfordBreak4. Weyerhaeuser Phil Russell5. SABIC Elizabeth Jordan6. Argonne National Labs Diane GrazianoLunch - working7. Shell Global Solutions Joe Machado 8. ADM Research Tom Binder9. ConocoPhillips Bruce Randolph
Synthesis of Views, Hypotheses, Best Practices/Rationales (1-2 hours)Adjourn by 3 pm
8:00 am Central
8:30 am
10:00 am
11:45 am
1:30 pm
10:15 am
12:00 pm
IRI Annual MeetingBoston, MA 15May 21, 2009 15
Significant Participant Comments Biggest opportunity is in tradeoffs between portfoliosAnnual planning with mid-year interdivision reallocation. Monthly allocations within divisionMixed metrics – coverage, 5 year returns, productivity, gates on time, pass ratioXYZ appears to have a good transparency systemPlatforms and New Product Introductions have differing measuresEmphasis on resource allocation to themes / strategic allocation
Hypotheses -“Rules and Tools”
IRI Annual MeetingBoston, MA 17May 21, 2009
Overview of HypothesesCommon Denominators
Transparency and taxonomiesCharacterization
Trade-Offs Are Complex Executive judgmentOptimizationInterdependencies
Uncertainties and RiskUpdate frequencyFunding
IRI Annual MeetingBoston, MA 18May 21, 2009 18
PoP HypothesesTransparency is paramount; taxonomies help
PoP Management starts with sharing informationCommon terms/structures ease comparisons
Characterization is critical in key areas of risk, benefit, costs, and timing; metrics important
PoP Mgt is about maximization & trade-offs described in key areas aboveSummary metrics (portfolio level) assist comparisons
IRI Annual MeetingBoston, MA 19May 21, 2009 19
PoP HypothesesBlending of quantitative and qualitative trade-offs is best implemented through executive judgment
Trade-off analyses exceed pure quantitative inputs Some critical data are judgmentalBlending all factors is best done by executive debate
‘Step-wise’ optimization is best general process
Maximization of benefits subject to constraintsIterative pattern of PoP optimization/executive review
IRI Annual MeetingBoston, MA 20May 21, 2009 20
PoP HypothesesInterdependence ‘trumps’ unit ‘sub-optimums’
Synergy strengthens PoPsMay be exceptions identified in iterations
Uncertainties require multiple updates per year Re-balancing driven by natural cycles of knowledge development Re-balancing driven by new externalities
Discretionary funding sources offset risk aversionGroups avoid risk – multiples multiply (.9)x(.9)…Only individual ‘pools’ with discretion offset risk aversion
Venture capital model
Thank you
What questions may we answer?
IRI Annual MeetingBoston, MA 21May 21, 2009
IRI Annual MeetingBoston, MA
07-2 Innovation Portfolio ManagementThe Original Mindmap – Feb 2007
Mind Map – Portfolio Management Tools
Mgmt. Tools for Execs vs. Project Leaders?
“Normal” vs. High-Risk,
High-Return
Metrics: Retrospective and Prospective; Process and Results
Software Tools; IT Support and Application Development
External Resources and Existing
Literature
Culture of Innovation; Support Organizational Goals; Define “Ideal” Organization
ID Best-in-Class Companies Efficiently Managing Project Portfolios
May 21, 2009 22