Download - Innovation, inequality, and social mobility
![Page 1: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Innovation, inequality,and social mobility
Philippe Aghion
![Page 2: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction
• What did (top) income inequality accelerate over the past three decades?
• In this presentation we argue that innovation is part of the explanation
![Page 3: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Outline
–Part 1: Innovation and top income inequality using aggregate cross US state panel data
–Part 2: Innovation and between‐firm wage inequality using UK individual and firm‐level data
–Part 3: Innovation, inequality and social mobility using Finnish individual and firm‐level data
![Page 5: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Part 1: Innovation and top income inequality using aggregate US
cross state panel data
5
![Page 6: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• Joint work with U. Akcigit, A. Bergeaud, R. Blundell and D. Hemous
![Page 7: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Top income inequality and innovation
• Our core empirical analysis is carried out at the US state level
• Our dataset covers the period 1975‐2014, a time range imposed upon us by the availability of patent data
• Regressing top income inequality on innovativeness:
log
![Page 8: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
IV regressions – Main results with Appropriation Committee
![Page 9: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
OLS regressions – CZ – Innovation on Mobility
![Page 11: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Conclusions from Part 1
• Innovation is a source of top income inequality
• Innovation does not increase broad inequality• Innovation enhances social mobility
![Page 13: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
By contrast, lobbying…
• Increases top income inequality• Increases inequality at large• Reduces social mobility• Does not enhance growth
![Page 14: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Part 2: Innovation and between‐firm wage inequality using UK individual
and firm‐level data
14
![Page 15: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• Joint ongoing work with A. Bergeaud, R. Blundell and R. Griffith
![Page 16: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Questions
• Recent work by Bloom et al (2016) suggests that increased wage inequality is more between firms than within firms
• Here we look at relationship between innovativeness and between‐firm wage inequality
![Page 17: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Data sample
• We use ONS data on R&D by all UK firms with more than 400 employees between 2004 and 2010
• We match these data with detailed individual information on skill (occupation), wage and hours worked for 1% of UK population randomly selected
![Page 18: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
A first regression
18
•
log_w (1) (2)
RD_intensity 0.187***(0.0102)
0.133***(0.00913)
Age 0.122***(0.0009)
0.084***(0.00077)
Age2 ‐0.0013***(‐0.00001)
‐0.00088***(‐0.0000)
Size ‐0.0243***(‐0.00093)
0.00013(0.00084)
Gender 0.222***(0.0032)
0.182***(0.0029)
N 509,281 509,281
Fixed effects Year Labour Mkt
OLS regression with robust standard errors clustered at the enterprise level
![Page 19: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Average log of wage for R&D firms versus non R&D firms
19
![Page 20: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Share of R&D firms workers
Note: each percentile aggregates around 5100 observations20
![Page 21: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Average log of wage by age and skill Level
Low Skill workers High Skill workers
21
![Page 22: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Conclusions from Part 2
• Average wage higher in more R&D intensive firms• Surprisingly, firm‐level R&D intensity affects low‐skill wages more than high‐skill wages
• Potential explanations:– Innovative firms become more selective (more O‐Ring organizational forms?) and thus only keep the more experienced workers among the low‐skill
– Higher bargaining power of low skill workers in more innovative/O‐Ring firms
![Page 23: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Part 3: Innovation, inequality and social mobility using Finnish individual and firm‐level data
23
![Page 24: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
motivation• “American Dream” implies that everybody in the society should
have an equal opportunity to achieve success and upward social mobility.
• However, the data shows some striking patterns:
![Page 25: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
data• We merge four Finnish datasets, 1988‐2012:1. Individual data on income, education and other characteristics,
from Statistics Finland (SF)2. Firm‐level data (inventors' co‐workers, senior/junior managers,
entrepreneurs), from Statistics Finland (SF)3. Patent data from European Patent Oce (EPO)4. IQ data from the Finnish Defence Force (FDF)
![Page 26: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Who Becomes an Inventor?
![Page 27: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Who Becomes an Inventor? Visual Representation
![Page 28: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Who Becomes an Inventor?
![Page 29: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Who Becomes an Inventor?
![Page 30: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Returns to Innovation
• Fact: Inventor gains around 1% for 10 years.
![Page 31: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Returns to Innovation
• Fact: Coworkers gain in the short run.
![Page 32: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Returns to Innovation
• Fact: Coworkers lose in the long run.
![Page 33: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Returns to Innovation
• Fact: Entrepreneur gains almost 10 times in the long‐run.
![Page 34: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Returns to Innovation
• entrepreneur > senior manager > inventor > coworker
![Page 35: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Additional Analysis• Income Mobility: For non‐inventors the wage at age 35 is a main
determinant of wage at age 45, but conditional on inventing by age 33, initial wage at age 35 matters very little for wage at age 45 (inventor dummy is paramount)
• Social Mobility: For non‐inventors, father's income percentile has a determinant effect on individual's income percentile (at age 35), but this correlation between father income and son income disappears for inventors (inventor dummy is paramount)
![Page 36: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Conclusions from Part 3
• Credit constraints are not an impediment to become an inventor. What matters is education and IQ.
• Inventing is a social elevator for both the inventor and her co‐workers
• Return is much higher for the entrepreneur than the inventor. Important implications for tax policy
![Page 37: Innovation, inequality, and social mobility](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020702/61f9e491561c4f05b446db47/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Overall conclusion
• Innovation is one important factor behind the observed acceleration in wage and top‐income inequality
• Innovation induces social mobility• Implications for tax policy