Download - Indept fgd kelembagaan bbptp (yuti)
1
Wawancara Mendalam (In-Depth Interview )
2
= a qualitative research technique that involves conducting intensive
individual interviews
…. to explore their perspectives on a particular idea, program, or situation.
Kapan In-Depth Interviews sesuai digunakan? when you want detailed information about a person’s
thoughts and behaviors want to explore new issues in depth. to provide context to other data (such as outcome
data), offering a more complete picture of what happened in
the program and why. in place of focus groups if the potential participants may
not be included or comfortable talking openly in a group,
distinguish individual (as opposed to group) opinions about the program
to refine questions for future surveys of a particular group.
3
Keuntungan In-Depth Interviews =
provide much more detailed informationprovide a more relaxed atmosphere in
which to collect information Kelemahan In-Depth Interviews = Kemungkinan biasButuh waktu : conduct interviews,
transcribe, and analyze the resultsHarus peneliti yang mampu Not generalizable
4
Process In-Depth Interviews:
1. Plan (siapa yang akan terlibat, apa info yg mau
dikumpulkan, dll)2. Develop Instruments (untuk menjaga konsistensi
wawancara, bagaimana urutannya, apa yang akan dilakukan selama wawancara, penerjemah,
3. Train Data Collectors (speak the local language).4. Collect Data (be sure to explain the purpose of
the interview, why the stakeholder has been chosen, and the expected duration of the interview).
5. Analyze Data (transcribe, review data, analyze all interview data).
6. Disseminate Findings (write report and see “How are In-Depth Interviews Presented?.
5
Interview QuestionTips:
Questions should be open-ended
Ask factual question before opinion questions.
Use probes as needed (example, elaborate, jelaskan lebih jauh, apa ada yang lain ?, …)
6
Focus Group Discussion:
7
Focus Group Discussion:
= is a rapid assessment, semi‐structured data gathering method in which a purposively selected set of participants gather to discuss issues and concerns based on a list of key themes drawn up by the researcher/facilitator (Kumar, 1987).
Focus group discussion guide
1. Specify the objectives and information needs of the focus group discussion (misal; bagaimana penyuluh dan pengamat hama membuat keputusan dala merespon meledaknya serangan hama)
2. Break down the major topics into discussion points or themes.
3. Prepare probe questions (mari kita bicara tentang …..., apa informasi yang didapat dari lapang?,…..bagaimana respon pihak …..?
4. Review the guide and eliminate any irrelevant questions.
8
Syarat untuk menjadi Facilitator FGD:
1. familiarity with the discussion topic2. ability to speak the language spoken
of the area3. cultural sensitivity.4. genuine interest in people5. sensitivity to men and women6. Politeness7. Empathy8. Respect for participants
9
Langkah-langkah kegiatan FGD:
1. Pembukaan, jelaskan tujuan dan skop2. Tanyakan nama dan background peserta.3. Gunakan panduan pertanyaan yg telah
disiapkan4. Beri kesempatan yg sama untuk peserta
berpartisipasi.5. Gunakan beragam teknik untuk menggali
data, misalnya: biarkan peserta saling berbicara secara langsung tanpa melalui moderator, yg malu-malu di dorong bicara, kendalikan yg dominan, dst.
10
Pedoman menyusun pedoman wawancara:
1. FGD adalah untuk listen and learn, bukan mengajar
2. bagi kerja antar anggota tim 3. semua anggota tim pegang FGD guide. 4. pahami dan gunakan bahasa dan istilah lokal 5. open mind and listen more. 6. hindari Yes or No answers.7. hindari leading questions. 8. perhatikan local norms and customs.9. Ingat, waktu bagi peserta juga penting 10. Ucapkan terima kasih
11
Laporan FGD disusun dengan cara:
1. reviewing the notes 2. listening again to the cassettes from the session 3. grouping research findings according to key themes4. identifying the different positions that emerged
under each key theme5. summarizing each of the different positions and
assess the extent to which each6. position was held by participants7. pulling out verbatim phrases that represent each
position.8. identifying the recurrent ideas that came out during
the discussion9. interpreting these recurrent ideas based upon other
findings that emerged in the groups
12
Analisis Kelembagaan (Institutional Analysis)
Syahyuti, 16 Mei 2012 @BBPTP
13
In English Biasa diterjemahkan menjadi
Terminologi semestinya
Batasan dan materinya
1. institution Kelembagaan, institusi
Lembaga Berisi norma, nilai, regulasi, pengetahuan, dll. Menjadi pedoman dalam berperilaku aktor (individu dan organisasi)
2. institutional Kelembagaan, institusi
Kelembagaan Hal-hal berkenaan dengan lembaga.
3. organization Organisasi, lembaga Organisasi Adalah social group, aktor sosial, yg sengaja dibentuk, punya anggota, utk mencapai tujuan tertentu, aturan dinyatakan tegas. Misal: koperasi, kelompok tani, kantor pemerintah.
4. organizational
Keorganisasian, kelembagaan
Keorganisasian Hal-hal berkenaan dengan organisasi. Misal: kepemimpinan, keanggotaan, manajemen, keuangan organisasi, kapasitas organisasi, relasi dgn organisasi lain.
Rekonseptualisasi “Lembaga” dan “Organisasi”
14
Institutions. Lembaga = norma + aturan + cultural cognitive
Organization = organisasi
Social Network = jaringan sosial
= individu
Apa itu Lembaga? Apa itu Organisasi?
Definsi menurut ahli ekonomi kelembagaan:
Douglass C. North:
“institutions = the long-standing rules and rights governing social and productive behavior, atau “the rules of the game”
organizations = the 'players' and structures, or "groups of individuals bound together by some common purpose to achieve objectives", atau their entrepreneurs are the players.
kelembagaan ekonomi dibentuk oleh aturan-aturan formal (formal constraints) berupa rules, laws, dan constitutions; dan aturan informal (informal constraints) berupa norma, kesepakatan, dan lain-lain. Seluruhnya merupakan penentu bagaimana terbentuknya struktur masyarakat dan kinerja ekonominya yang spesifik.
15
Di bidang sosiologi:
W. Richard Scott. 2001. Institutions and Organizations, Second Edition. Sage Publications, Inc. California.
Arti institution:
1. are composed of cultured-cognitive, normative, and regulative elements that, together with associated activities and resources, provide stability and meaning of social live.
2. are social structures that have attained a high degree of resilience. 3. are transmitted by various types of carriers, including symbolic
systems, relational systems, routines, and artifacts. 4. operate at multiple levels of jurisdiction, from the world system to
localized interpersonal relationships. 5. connote stabiliy but are subject to change processes, both
incremental and discontinuous.
unsur-unsur utama institusi: rules, norms, and cultural beliefs institusi ditentukan oleh batasan legal, prosedural, moral dan
kultural yang memiliki legitimasi. 16
Paham kelembagaan baru:
“institution are comprised of regulative, normative and cultural-cognitive elements that, together with associated activities and resources, provide stability and meaning to social life” (Richard Scott, 2008: 48):
Ada 3 pilar dalam institution:
1. Regulative pillar2. Normative pillar3. Cultural-cognitive pillar
17
(1) Regulative pillar:
rule setting, monitoring, sanksikapasitas untuk menegakkan aturanreward and punishmentcaranya: melalui mekanisme informal
(folkways) dan formal (polisi, pengeadilan)
represi dan constraintinstitution memberikan constraint dan
juga empower aktor
18
(2) Normative pillar:
Tokohnya: Durkheim, Parson, Selznicknorma menghasilkan preskripsi (=lebih
dari antisipasi dan prediksi), evaluatif, dan tanggung jawab dalam kehidupan
mencakup: value (= prefered and desirable) dan norm (how things should be done)
Gunanya: agar tahu apa goal dan objectives kita, dan bagaimana cara mencapainya
Juga meng-constraint dan meng-empower aktor
“rules define relationship among role”
19
(3) Cultural-cognitive pillar:
Tokohnya: Geertz, Douglass, Berger, Goffman, Meyer, DiMaggio, Powel, Scott
Intinya: MEANINGKonsep bersama tentang kehidupan sosial dan
kerangka dimana makna-makna diproduksiSedmintasi makna dan kristalisasi makna dalam
bentuk objektifBerisi proses interpretatif internal yang dibentuk
oleh kerangka kultural eksternalSituation shared secara kolektifBersifat indivdual (individu dan ’individual
organization’) dan variatifCulture = what is and what should be
20
Pedoman singkat untuk menilai sebuah organisasi (Short Guide for Organizational Assessment
1. Kinerja organisasi (Organizational Performance)
2. Kemampuan organisasi tumbuh di lingkungannya (The Enabling Environment and Organizational Performance)
3. Motivasi organisasi (Organizational Motivation)
4. Kapasitas Organisasi (Organizational Capacity)
21
22