Il cielo dei Raggi Gamma(o meglio: alcune sue sfaccettature, con un occhio particolare a Pisa)
FISICA 2013–2020, Congressino di Dipartimento, Pisa, 17 aprile 2013
Luca Baldini (Universita di Pisa e INFN-Sezione di Pisa)
Gamma-ray astronomy: motivationsNote: gamma-ray is a generic term covering ∼ 1/2 of the EM spectrum
I S. Hayakawa, Prog. Theor. Phys., 8 (1952), pp. 571–572I Gamma rays produced by decay of neutral pions produced by
cosmic-ray (CR) interactions with the interstellar medium (ISM).
I P. Morrison, Il Nuovo Cimento, 7 (1958), pp. 858–865I Production mechanisms: synchrotron radiation, bremsstrahlung,π0 decay, radioactive decays, e+ e− annihilation.
I Possible sources: the active sun1, the Crab Nebula2, anomalousextragalactic sources (M 873), Galactic diffuse emission4, isotropicdiffuse emission5.
I (Sstrangely enough, dark matter is not mentioned at this time.)I Straight from the abstract: “. . . γ-rays arise rather directly in nuclear
or high-energy processes, and yet travel in straight line.”
1ApJ, 745 (2012), pp. 1442ApJ, 674 (2008), pp. 1037; ApJ, 708 (2010), pp. 1254–1267 and many others3ApJ, 707 (2009), pp. 55; Science, 325 (2009), pp. 444–4484ApJ, 750 (2012), pp. 35PRL, 104 (2010), pp. 101101
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 2 / 28
Gamma-ray astronomers have two big problemsCredits: T. Weeks, Fermi Summer School 2012
Wavelength [m]
103 1 10−3 10−6 10−9 10−12 10−15
Frequency [Hz]
106 109 1012 1015 1018 1021 1024
100%
50%
0% Atm
osp
her
ic
op
aci
ty
I Problem #1: no optics (i.e., collection area = detector area).I Gamma rays cannot be focused nor reflected (yet).I Solution: make the detectors bigger.
I Problem #2: the Earth’s atmosphere is equivalent to ∼ 1 m of lead.I Or ∼ 28 X0: no primaries above 10 eV reach the Earth’s surface.I Solution #1: go up in space (space-based γ-ray astronomy);I Solution #2: look at secondaries (ground-based γ-ray astronomy).
Note: this talk does not cover at all the Compton regime and the extensiveair showers (EAS) detectors.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 3 / 28
Space-based gamma-ray astronomyDetection principle (in the pair-production regime)
Photon Energy
1 Mb
1 kb
1 b
10 mb10 eV 1 keV 1 MeV 1 GeV 100 GeV
(b) Lead (Z = 82)
- experimental σtot
σp.e.
κe
Cro
ss s
ecti
on
(b
arn
s/a
tom
)C
ross
sec
tio
n
(bar
ns/a
tom
)
10 mb
1 b
1 kb
1 Mb
(a) Carbon (Z = 6)
σRayleigh
σg.d.r.
σCompton
σCompton
σRayleigh
κnuc
κnuc
κe
σp.e.
- experimental σtot
γ ray
e+ e−
Tracker/converter
Calorimeter
Anti-coincidence shield
Tracking plane
Conversion plane
I Pair production is the dominant interactionprocess for photons above ∼ 10 MeV;
I e+e− pair provides the information aboutthe γ-ray direction/energy;
I e+e− pair provides a clear signature forbackground rejection (charged particlesoutnumber gamma rays by 103–104).
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 4 / 28
Space-based gamma-ray astronomyHistorical overview
— First generation: counters
I OSO-III (1968)I First full-sky survey, 621 photons above 50 MeV.
— Second generation: spark chambers
I SAS-2 (1972–1973)I Detection of diffuse emission and a few point sources.
I COS-B (1975–1982)I Comparable to SAS-2 in performance, much longer duration.
I EGRET (1991–2000)I First detailed full sky survey, hundreds of point sources discovered.
— Third generation: silicon-strip detectors
I AGILE (2007–?)I Comparable to EGRET in terms of effective area, limited to
∼ 20 GeV by its mini-calorimeter.
I Fermi/GLAST (2008–?)I ×50 EGRET in acceptance.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 5 / 28
The Fermi Large Area Telescope
Large Area telescope
I Numerology: 1.8 × 1.8 m2 footprint, 3000 kg weight, 650 W power, ∼ 1.2 Mb/s bandwidth.
I Observing 20% of the sky at any time, or the entire sky for 30 minutes every 3 hours.
1.8 m
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 6 / 28
The LAT silicon tracker
The LAT silicon-strip tracker
I 12k sensors, 90 m2 of silicon active area, 1M readout channels, built and tested right here!
I After ∼ 5 years in space: 99.9% average hit efficiency ∼ 500 (∼ 5 × 10−4) strips masked.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 7 / 28
Ground-based gamma-ray astronomyDetection principle
I Simple technique, simple detectors(but only in principle!).
I The atmosphere is part of thedetector.
I Good: free and limitless.I Bad: no control over its conditions,
source of variable background light.
I Physics of EM showers wellunderstood.
I Detailed and realistic Monte Carlosimulations possible.
I Fundamental difference in the showertopology between EM and hadronicinteractions.
I Key to background rejection.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 8 / 28
Ground-based gamma-ray astronomyHistorical overview
— First generation: various materials (including a trash bin)I Crimea, Dublin, Whipple, Narrabri. . . (1960–1985)
I No imaging capabilities, weak or no background discrimination.
— Second generation: Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes(IACTs)
I Whipple, Crimea, CAT, HEGRA, Durham. . . (1985–2003)I A source, at last: the Whipple 10 m reflector, with a 37-pixel
camera, detects the Crab at 9σ6, ApJ, 342 (1989), pp. 379–395.I In 1992 Whipple detects the first extra-Galactic source (Mkr 421).
— Third generation: small arrays of large IACTsI MAGIC-2, HESS-5, CANGAROO-III, VERITAS-4 (2003–present)
I Stereo-operation enhances the background rejection capabilities.
6. . . Prof. A.E. Chudakov suggested that the acceptable standard of credibility for anew VHE γ-ray source should be 5σ. [. . . ] At that stage we had managed toaccumulate a 3σ result. . .Years later [. . . ] I reminded him of his 5σ credibility criterion [. . . ] and proudlyannounced that [. . . ] we now had a 9σ signal from the Crab. He paused for a momentand then said drolly: “I think I should have said 10σ.” —T. Weeks (9910394v1)
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 9 / 28
The MAGIC telescope. . .
MAGIC
I Operating at Canary Island La Palma, 2200 m above the sea level.
I Stereoscopic system composed of two 17 m-diameter telescopes, record-breaking low-energy threshold.
The secret contribution to thesuccess of the experiment!
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 10 / 28
. . . But first came CLUE!
A. Menzione, Italian Phys. Soc. Conf. Proc., 8 (1987), pp. 352
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 11 / 28
Space- vs. ground-based gamma-ray astronomy
Parameter Space-based Ground-based
Effective area ∼ 1 m2 ∼ 105 m2
Field of view ∼ 2.5 sr ∼ 2.5 × 10−2 sr
Angular resolution 0.1–5◦, depending on E ∼ 0.1◦ at all E
Duty cycle ∼ 85% ∼ 10%
Energy range ∼ 20 MeV–300 GeV ∼ 50 GeV–50 TeV
I Operative summary: space-based and ground-based instrumentlargely complementary.
I Space-based instruments: act as all-sky monitors (source catalogs,transients, study of the diffuse emission).
I Ground-based instruments: pointing, best for source studies(especially extended sources).
I Moreover, they are sensitive in different energy ranges, withdemonstrated overlap.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 12 / 28
Dissecting the gamma-ray sky
I The Fermi γ-ray skyI Rate map (exposure corrected) of γ-candidates above 200 MeV
collected by Fermi during the first year of data taking.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 13 / 28
Dissecting the gamma-ray sky
=
I Fermi: Galactic diffuse emission (accounts for 80–90% of γ rays).I The cosmic-ray/gamma-ray connection (Hayakawa, Morrison).I Also: direct CR measurements and imaging of the acceleration sites.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 13 / 28
Dissecting the gamma-ray sky
= +
I Fermi: resolved point sources (a.k.a. the source catalog).I 2FGL: 24 months of data, ∼ 36 M events in 100 MeV–100 GeV.I 1873 sources (575 of which are unassociated).
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 13 / 28
Dissecting the gamma-ray sky
= + +
I Fermi: isotropic diffuse (a.k.a. extragalactic diffuse emission)I Unresolved sources, residual CRs and truly diffuse emission.I This would be very hard (impossible?) for IACTs.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 13 / 28
The TeV source cataloghttp://tevcat.uchicago.edu/
143 sources,20 discovered by MAGIC
(Fermi skymap overlaid)
I About an order of magnitude less than the 2FGL.I Remember: IACTs are pointing instruments, while Fermi looks at the
entire sky ∼ continuously.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 14 / 28
Zooming in. . .
MAGIC 0.3–1 TeV
MAGIC > 1 TeV
Fermi 2–10 GeV
I IACTs definitely have betterimaging capabilities forextended sources:
I better PSF;I larger effective area.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 15 / 28
And now a spectrum
I Combined Fermi-MAGIC spectrum of the Crab Nebula.I Note the overlap between ∼ 50 and 300 GeV.I Remarkable agreement between two completely different techniques.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 16 / 28
Looking back to just a few years ago. . .
I TeV gamma rays from the Galactic Center, ApJ, 619 (2005),pp. 306–313:
I Significant discrepancies between different IACTs: miscalibration ofdetectors or time variability?
I Spectral gap between EGRET and IACTs.
I Crucial to have good and simultaneous coverage, possibly fromdifferent instruments.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 17 / 28
More on point-sources: gamma-ray pulsars
I Second Fermi-LAT pulsar catalog about to be submitted:I based on three years of data, 117 pulsars above 100 MeV;I unprecedented sample: clarify emission mechanisms, allows for
population studies.I Fermi public list of 125 discovered gamma-ray pulsars, already.
I Only 7 gamma-ray pulsars were known before Fermi.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 18 / 28
IACTs see pulsation, too!
I MAGIC detects pulsation from the Crabpulsar above 25 GeV:
I Science, 322 (2008), pp. 1221–1224I Relatively high cutoff energy in the
phase-averaged spectrum.
I VERITAS detects pulsation above 100GeV:
I Science, 334, 2011 (69), pp. :I “The detection cannot be explained on
the basis of present pulsar models.”
I MAGIC confirms the VHE pulsation:I A&A, 540 (2012), pp. A69
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 19 / 28
Transient sources: Gamma-Ray Bursts
I The Fermi low-energy instrument (GBM) detects ∼ 250 GRBs/yearI ∼ 1/2 in the LAT field of view, ∼ 10% detected by the LAT.
I First Fermi-LAT GRB catalog just submitted (arXiv:1303.2908v1):I Based on three years of data, 35 GRBs detected above 20 MeV.
I Modern IACTs equipped to react to real-time alerts and repoint.I But no positive detection, so far.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 20 / 28
GRBs and tests of Lorentz invariance
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Cou
nts/
bin
0
50
100
150
Cou
nts/
s
0
5000
10000
15000
-0.0
3
GBM NaIs
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Cou
nts/
bin
050
100150200
Cou
nts/
s05000100001500020000GBM BGOs
Cou
nts/
bin
0
20
40
Cou
nts/
s
0
2000
4000LAT(All events)
Cou
nts/
bin
0
2
4
Cou
nts/
s
0
200
400LAT(> 100 MeV)
Time since GBM trigger (May 10, 2009, 00:22:59.97 UT) (s)-0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Cou
nts/
bin
0
1
2
3
Ener
gy [G
eV]
21
51020LAT
(> 1 GeV)
0.63
0.73
Ener
gy (M
eV)
10
210
310
410
(0.26–5 MeV)
(8–260 keV)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
0.53
I GRBs make for perfect objects fortime-delay experiments:
I Test for deviation of the standarddispersion relation in the form:
v(E) = c
[1 ±
(E
mQG ,n
)n]I Need large ∆E and large distances.
I GRB 090510: a 31 GeV photondetected 0.829 s after the trigger fromz ∼ 0.9:
I Nature, 462 (2009), pp. 331I mQG ,1 larger than the Plank mass,
i.e. rules out models with n = 1.
I IACTs rule for n = 2!I Physically more interesting if CPT is
not violated.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 21 / 28
More transient sources: the Sunhttp://apod.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 22 / 28
Even more transient sources: two surprises!
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 23 / 28
Indirect searches for Dark Matter
Galactic center
Good statistics but sourceconfusion and diffuse backgroundSatellites
Low background and goodsource id, but low statistics
Milky Way halo
Large statistics but diffusebackground
Galaxy clusters
Low background but low statistics
Spectral lines
No astrophysicaluncertainties, good source idbut small branching ratio
Extra-galactic γ radiation
Large statistics, butastrophysics and galacticdiffuse background
And electrons/positrons!
Complementary to γs
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 24 / 28
A gamma-ray line in the diffuse emission?
I C. Weniger, JCAP, 1208 (2012), pp. 007 and many, many othersI Yes: Fermi-LAT data are public. . .
I The LAT collaboration has a line-search paper on preparation:I Significance slightly lower with updated instrument calibration and
better energy dispersion model;I feature seems to be narrower than the energy resolution;I (smaller) feature at the same E in the Earth limb control sample.
I Too early to draw any definitive conclusion.I But substantial chances to answer the question in the mid term.I (Substantial rework of the event-level analysis in progress.)
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 25 / 28
Looking at the future: the clear part
I The Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA):I Large array of telescopes (three different mirror sizes, layout and site
choice to be frozen).
I Exciting prospectives for studying γ-ray sources above 10 GeV:I Large flexibility in optimizing the observation strategy;I all-sky survey not unfeasible.
I Would still definitely benefit from a large-FOV space observatoryoperating at the same time.
I e.g., GRB alerts, flaring sources, multi-wavelength coverage.I (And also: how about the study of the diffuse emission?)
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 26 / 28
Looking at the future: the foggy part
I Proposing a new space mission? Need to do an order of magnitudebetter than the previous one.
I Fermi already saturates the space available on the typical launcherfor a mid-size mission (hard to scale ×10).
I New concepts being explored but no clear plans for the near future.I A relatively low-energy detector with no converters?I Or rather a high-energy7 instrument with emphasis on energy
resolution (CALET, Gamma-400, DAMPE, HERD)?
I Maybe even another Fermi would be a useful thing to have?I Surely it would for CTA.I And the gamma-ray sky is highly variable (i.e., always new).I In passing: Fermi is about to finish its prime (5-years) phase and
missions extensions are decided every other year—the currentbaseline is to operate through 2016.
7But remember: there is only about 1 celestial gamma-ray per week above 1 TeVtraversing an instrument as big as the Fermi LAT!
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 27 / 28
Conclusions
I This is a very exciting time for gamma-ray astronomy.I Huge leap over the last decade, both theoretically and
observationally.I Gamma-ray astronomy: no more an “order-of-magnitude” type of
science.
I Pisa is at the forefront of all this:I with a multi-faceted, well-rounded contribution.
I Much more has to come on the horizon of the next ∼ 5 years.I Fermi will continue collecting data and will go through a major
upgrade of the event reconstruction.I Several IACTs (MAGIC, H.E.S.S., VERITAS) taking data.
I Beyond that. . .I The path is more or less clear for the ground-based community;I not that much for the space-based instruments.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 28 / 28
LAT IRFs
Energy [MeV]210 310 410 510
]2 [m
eff
On-
axis
A
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
P7SOURCE_V6 TotalP7SOURCE_V6 FrontP7SOURCE_V6 Back
(a)
]° [θ0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
]2 a
t 10
GeV
[mef
fA
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
P7SOURCE_V6 TotalP7SOURCE_V6 FrontP7SOURCE_V6 Back
(b)
Energy [MeV]210 310 410 510
]°C
onta
inm
ent a
ngle
[
-110
1
10
P7SOURCE_V6 Back 95%P7SOURCE_V6 Combined 95%P7SOURCE_V6 Front 95%P7SOURCE_V6 Back 68%P7SOURCE_V6 Combined 68%P7SOURCE_V6 Front 68%
Energy [MeV]210 310 410 510
On-
axis
ene
rgy
reso
lutio
n
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
P7SOURCE_V6 FrontP7SOURCE_V6 CombinedP7SOURCE_V6 Back
(a)
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 Spare slides
The Fermi Large Area Telescope
Large Area telescope
I Numerology: 1.8 × 1.8 m2 footprint, 3000 kg weight, 650 W power, ∼ 1.2 Mb/s bandwidth.
I Large field of view (∼ 2.4 sr): observing 20% of the sky at any time, or the entire sky for 30 minutesevery 3 hours.
I 85% duty cycle (dictated by the SAA), long observation time (10 years goal).
“It uses less power than a toaster and we talk to it over a telephone line.” (Bill Atwood)
Silicon Tracker
I Silicon strip detectors, Wconversion foils; 1.5 radiationlengths on-axis.
I 10k sensors, 73 m2 of siliconactive area, 1M readoutchannels.
I High-precision tracking, shortinstrumental dead time.
Anti-Coincidence Detector
I Segmented (89 tiles) tominimize self-veto at highenergy.
I 0.9997 average efficiency(8 fiber ribbons coveringgaps between tiles).
Calorimeter
I 1536 CsI(Tl) crystal; 8.6 radiationlengths on-axis.
I Hodoscopic, 3D shower profilereconstruction for leakage correction.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 Spare slides
Looking at the future: the foggy part
sr)2Acceptance (m
-310 -210 -110 1 10
Live
time
(s)
410
510
610
710
810
910
= 1 monthobsT
= 1 yearobsT
= 1 dayobsT
= 10 yearsobsT
sr s2 m
5 = 10
fE
sr s2 m
6 = 10
fE
sr s2 m
7 = 10
fE
sr s2 m
8 = 10
fE
AGILE
AMS01
AMS02 AMS02 (CAL only)
ATIC
BESS
BESS-Polar
BETS
Buffington 1972-73
CALET (planned 2013)
CAPRICE94
COS-B
DAMPE (planned 2015)
Daugherty 1972
EGRET
Nishimura 1968-79
Fanselow 1965-66
Fermi LAT
Gamma 400 (planned 2018)
Golden 1976 Hartman 1977
HEAT
HERD (planned 2020)
H.E.S.S.
MASS
Meegan 1969-73
Muller 1984
PAMELA
PPB-BETS
Silverberg 1969-72
Tang 1980TS93
CalorimetricSpace-based
Balloon
SpectrometersSpace-based
Balloon
I Most of the forthcoming instruments focus on energy resolution.I And do it for good reasons. . .I . . . but keep in mind: there’s a trade-off with the acceptance.
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 Spare slides
How many high-energy gamma rays out there?
Rigidity (GV) or Energy (GeV)-110 1 10 210 310
)-1
sr
-1 s
-2In
tegr
al fl
ux a
bove
a g
iven
ene
rgy
(m
-610
-510
-410
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410Primary protonsAMS01 (Aguilar et al. 2002)Pamela (Adriani et al. 2011)ATIC-2 (Panov et al. 2006)CREAM (Yoon et al. 2011)
Primary electronsAMS01 (Aguilar et al. 2002)Pamela (Adriani et al. 2011)Fermi LAT (Abdo et al. 2010)H.E.S.S. (Aharonian et al. 2008)
Primary positronsPamela (Adriani et al. 2008)
Gamma-ray all-sky intensityFermi LAT (unpublished)
Gamma-ray extragalactic diffuseFermi LAT (Abdo et al. 2010)
Inte
gral
rat
e of
par
ticle
s cr
ossi
ng th
e LA
T (
Hz)
-610
-510
-410
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
510
1 particle/hour
1 particle/day
1 particle/month
I ∼ 1 γ ray/week (from anywhere in the sky) traversing Fermi.I You really need as much acceptance as possible to study high-energy
gamma rays in space!
Luca Baldini (Unipi and INFN) Pisa, April 17, 2013 Spare slides